Institutional Effectiveness Achievement Report
Engineering Technology: BS Engineering Technology Concentration in Electromechanical ET 2014­2015 Institutional Effectiveness Achievements Report
Unit Head: Walter Boles
Reports to: College of Basic & Applied Sciences
Mission:
The Electromechanical Engineering Technology Program prepares graduates:
1. For careers in design, development, analysis, implementation, integration, maintenance, and operation of electrical and mechanical components and/or electromechanical systems.
2. To lead teams as required, engage in self­directed continuing professional development, and join a professional society such as ASME, SAE, SME, ASEE, IEEE, etc.
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes are implemented in course content by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET criteria A: an ability to select and
apply the knowledge, techniques, skills, and
modern tools of the discipline to broadly­
defined engineering technology activities.
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT) All ET majors are
assessed by the MFT, which measures
knowledge and application in the students​
major/concentration. The MFT consists of 100
conceptual and engineering calculations
questions with multiple choice answers. 50% is
the benchmark.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The average test score was 63% for
fall 2014 and 68% for spring 2015.
The goal was exceeded.
Supporting Document(s):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changes
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changes
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Course Exercises: May include tests, final
exam, homework, projects and lab reports.
Scores are Pass and Fail.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
Instructor
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Result: ET 3601 76%(fall) & 86%
(spring). Goal exceeded.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
The score was 4.4 (fall) & 4.1
(spring). The goal was met.
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Survey Questions: These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes are implemented in course content by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET criteria B: an ability to select and
apply a knowledge of mathematics, science,
engineering, and technology to engineering
technology problems that require the
application of principles and applied
procedures or methodologies.
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT) All ET majors are
assessed by the MFT, which measures
knowledge and application in the students​
major/concentration. The MFT consists of 100
conceptual and engineering calculations
questions with multiple choice answers. 50% is
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Result: 58%(fall) & 64%(spring). Goal exceeded.
Supporting Document(s):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
the benchmark.
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changes
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changes
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 2:
Survey Questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
4.3(fall) and 3.9(spring). Goal
exceeded.
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes are implemented in course content by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET criteria C: an ability to conduct
standard tests and measurements; to
conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments;
and to apply experimental results to improve
processes.
Measure 1:
Course exercises May include tests, final
exam, homework, projects and lab reports.
The scores are Pass and Fail.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
instructor
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Fall 2014 ET 3630 Lab score 89.6%
formal lab report
score is 75.77% Fall 2014 ET 3650
Project 4 score is
80.3% Project 11 score
is 83.63% Spring 2015 ET 3602 lab
score is 91.1% Goal exceeded
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changes
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Questions: These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
4.1(fall) and 4.2(spring) Goal
exceeded
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET criteria D: an ability to design
systems, components, or processes for
broadly­defined engineering technology
problems appropriate to program educational
objectives.
Measure 1:
Survey questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 4.3(fall) & 4.0(spring). Goal exceeded.
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Capstone course Benchmark 60.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
instructor
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
95% average on capstone
Benchmark exceeded
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET criteria E: an ability to function
effectively as a member or leader on a
technical team.
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT) All ET majors are
assessed by the MFT, which measures
knowledge and application in the students​
major/concentration. The MFT consists of 100
conceptual and engineering calculations
questions with multiple choice answers. 50% is
the benchmark.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
(include strengths & weaknesses):
87%(fall) & 70%(spring) Benchmark
exceeded.
Supporting Document(s):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
4.4(fall) & 4.5(spring). Goal
exceeded.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
95%(fall) & 94%(spring) average
score. Benchmark exceeded
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Capstone course Benchmark 60
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
instructor
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET criteria F: an ability to identify,
Measure 1:
Survey questions These questions are
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Supporting Document(s):
Future
Actions
analyze, and solve broadly­defined
engineering technology problems.
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher. Concentration 4.7(fall) & 4.1(spring) Goal exceeded
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 2:
Capstone course Benchmark is 60.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Course
94% average Benchmark exceeded.
instructor
Completion
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Exit Interview The exit interview questions use
scale of 1 to 5 with 5 points as the best.
Satisfying answer is 3.0 or higher. Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses)
Concentration 4.0 overall average Goal exceeded
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET criteria G: an ability to apply written,
oral, and graphical communication in both
technical and nontechnical environments; and
an ability to identify and use appropriate
technical literature.
Measure 1:
Survey questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 4.4(fall) & 4.0(spring) Goals exceeded
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Capstone course Benchmark is 60.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
instructor
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
95% capstone projects average
Benchmark exceeded
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
95%(fall) & 94%(spring) student
projects average. Goal met.
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Course exercises May include tests, final
exam, homework, projects and lab reports.
The result are Pass and Fail.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
instructor
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET criteria H: an understanding of the
need for and an ability to engage in self­
directed continuing professional development.
Measure 1:
Survey questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 4.6(fall) & 4.4(spring) Goal exceeded
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Supporting Document(s):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Person(s)
Capstone course Score 0 ­ 100. Benchmark is Responsible:
60,
Course
instructor
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
95% average on student capstone
projects Benchmark exceeded.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses)
Concentration 5.0 overall average Goal exceeded.
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Exit interview questions Scale 1 ​
5, with 5 as
the best. Satisfying score is 3.0.
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET criteria I: an understanding of and a
commitment to address professional and
ethical responsibilities including a respect for
diversity.
Measure 1:
Survey questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 4.1(fall) & 4.2(spring) Goal exceeded.
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Person(s)
Capstone course Score 0 ­ 100. Benchmark is Responsible:
60.
Course
instructor
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
95% capstone course average
Benchmark exceeded.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
ET 1100 average score 80% for
assessment tests.
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Course exercises May include tests, final
exam, homework, projects and lab reports.
Score: Pass or Fail.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
instructor
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET criteria J: a knowledge of the impact
of engineering technology solutions in a
societal and global context.
Measure 1:
Survey questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 4.3(fall) & 3.9(spring) Goal exceeded.
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Capstone course In the capstone course,
students are required to conduct research for
identifying a proper technical project to work
on. This project must be approved by the
instructor. The projects, which students
completed, were from broad areas of
engineering field. The projects involved
research, design, fabrication, troubleshooting,
and presentation. The score is 0 ­ 100.
Benchmark is 60.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
instructor
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
95% student projects average.
Benchmark exceeded.
Measure 3:
Exit interview questions Scale 1 ​
5, with 5 as
the best. Satisfying score is 3.0.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses)
Concentration 4.0 overall average Goal exceeded
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET criteria K: a commitment to quality,
timeliness, and continuous improvement.
Measure 1:
Survey Questions: These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 4.9(fall) & 4.3(spring) Goal exceeded
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Supporting Document(s):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No significant
changed
needed.
Continuous
improvement
is
accomplished
through
incremental
changes.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No significant
changed
needed.
Continuous
improvement
is
accomplished
through
incremental
changes.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are needed.):
Measure 2:
The exit interview questions use scale of 1 to
5 with 5 points as the best. Satisfying answer
is 3.0 or higher.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 4.4 overall average Goal exceeded.
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
May include tests, final exam, homework,
projects and lab reports. Scores are Pass and
Fail.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
Instructor
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
ENGR 3915 student project average
90%.
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET program specific criteria associate A:
use computer­aided drafting or design tools to
prepare graphical representations of
electromechanical systems.
Measure 1:
Major field test All ET majors are assessed by
the MFT, which measures knowledge and
application in the students​
major/concentration.
The MFT consists of 100 conceptual and
engineering calculations questions with multiple
choice answers. 50% is the benchmark.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
54(fall) & 59(spring) Benchmark
exceeded.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 4.3(fall) & 4.1(spring) Goal exceeded.
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Course exercises Include tests, final exam,
homework, projects and lab reports. The
scores are Pass and Fail.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
instructor
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
ET 3360 Fall 14 Assignments: 90
Test­1: 86 Test­2: 93 Test­3: 83
Spring 15 Spring overall average
85% Goal exceeded
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET program specific criteria associate B:
use circuit analysis analog and digital
electronics, basic instrumentation, and
computer to aid in the characterization,
analysis, and troubleshooting of
electromechanical systems.
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT) All ET majors are
assessed by the MFT, which measures
knowledge and application in the students​
major/concentration. The MFT consists of 100
conceptual and engineering calculations
questions with multiple choice answers. 50% is
the benchmark.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
69%(fall) & 59%(spring) Goal
exceeded.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 2:
Person(s)
Survey questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 4.4(fall) & 3.9(spring) Goal exceeded.
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Course exercises May include tests, final
exam, homework, projects and lab reports. The
scores are Pass and Fail.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
instructor
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
ET 4610 62%(fall) ET 3620 91%
(spring) Goal exceeded.
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET program specific criteria associate C:
use statics, dynamics (or applied
mechanics), strength of materials,
engineering materials, and manufacturing
processes to aid in the characterization,
analysis, and troubleshooting of
electromechanical systems.
Measure 1:
Major field test All ET majors are assessed by
the MFT, which measures knowledge and
application in the students​
major/concentration.
The MFT consists of 100 conceptual and
engineering calculations questions with multiple
choice answers. 50% is the benchmark.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
57(fall) & 61(spring) Benchmark
exceeded
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 3.7(fall) & 3.9(spring) Goal exceeded.
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Course exercises May include tests, final
exam, homework, projects and lab reports. The
scores are Pass and Fail.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
Instructor
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
ENGR 2110 85%(fall) ET 3860 78%
(spring) Goal exceeded.
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET program specific criteria baccalaurate
A: use appropriate computer programming
languages for operating electromechanical
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT) All ET majors are
assessed by the MFT, which measures
knowledge and application in the students​
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
58(fall) & 64(spring) Benchmark
exceeded
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
systems.
major/concentration. The MFT consists of 100 and
conceptual and engineering calculations
department
questions with multiple choice answers. 50% is chair
the benchmark.
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher. Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Course
4.3(fall) & 3.9(spring) Goal exceeded
Instructor
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course exercises May include tests, final
exam, homework, projects and lab reports. The Instructor
scores are Pass and Fail.
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
ET 3650 80%(fall) student projects
average ET 4600 78%(spring) course
and project average
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET program specific criteria baccalaurate
B: use electrical/electronic devices such as
amplifiers, motors, relays, power systems,
and computer and instrumentation systems
for applied design, operation, or
troubleshooting of electromechanical
systems.
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT) All ET majors are
assessed by the MFT, which measures
knowledge and application in the students​
major/concentration. The MFT consists of 100
conceptual and engineering calculations
questions with multiple choice answers. 50%
is the benchmark.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
(include strengths & weaknesses):
65% (fall) & 76% (spring) Benchmark
exceeded.
Supporting Document(s):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Questions: These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
4.6 (fall) & 3.7 (spring) Goal
exceeded.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
Fall 2014 ET 3650 Project 4 score is
80.3% Project 11
score is 83.6% Spring 2015 ET 4640
lab/project scores average is 87%
Goal exceeded.
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Course Exercises May include tests, final
exam, homework, projects and lab reports. The
scores are Pass and Fail.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
Instructor
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET program specific criteria baccalaurate
C: use advanced topics in engineering
mechanics, engineering materials, and fluid
mechanics for applied design, operation, or
troubleshooting of electromechanical
systems.
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT) All ET majors are
assessed by the MFT, which measures
knowledge and application in the students​
major/concentration. The MFT consists of 100
conceptual and engineering calculations
questions with multiple choice answers. 50% is
the benchmark.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
56% (fall) & 59% (spring).
Benchmark exceeded.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 4.0(fall) & 3.9(spring) Goal exceeded
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Course Exercises May include tests, final
exam, homework, projects and lab reports. The
scores are Pass and Fail.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
Instructor
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
ENGR 1210 74%(fall) ET 3810 79%
(spring) Goal exceeded.
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET program specific criteria baccalaurate
D: use basic knowledge of control systems
for the applied design, operation, or
troubleshooting of electromechanical
systems.
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT) All ET majors are
assessed by the MFT, which measures
knowledge and application in the students​
major/concentration. The MFT consists of 100
conceptual and engineering calculations
questions with multiple choice answers. 50% is
the benchmark.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
62(fall) & 57(spring) Benchmark
exceeded.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher. Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
4.1(fall) & 4.2(spring). Goal
exceeded.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses)
Course
ET 4802 95%(fall) & 94%(spring) Instructor
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Course Exercises May include tests, final
exam, homework, projects and lab reports. The
scores are Pass and Fail. Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes in course content are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No
significant changes were necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET program specific criteria baccalaurate
E: use differential and integral calculus, as a
minimum, to characterize the static and
dynamic performance of electromechanical
systems.
Measure 1:
Survey Questions These questions are
designed to measure the graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting the student
outcomes after the completion of the program.
The score was from 1 to 5, with 5 as strongly
confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5 or higher.
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 3.0(fall) & 3.4(spring) Goal exceeded.
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Course Exercises May include tests, final
exam, homework, projects and lab reports.
The scores are Pass and Fail.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
Instructor
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
ET 4610 62%(fall) ET 3860 78%
(spring) Goal exceeded.
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Use of Prior Results : Incremental changes are made by continuing incremental improvements throughout the year to keep up with current technology in both knowledge and equipment. No significant changes were
necessary. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET program specific criteria baccalaurate
F: use appropriate management techniques in
the investigation, analysis, and design of
electromechanical systems.
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT) All ET majors are
assessed by the MFT, which measures
knowledge and application in the students​
major/concentration. The MFT consists of 100
conceptual and engineering calculations
questions with multiple choice answers. 50% is
the benchmark.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Concentration
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
N/A. No questions apply (0%). This
measure should be eliminated.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
No
significant
changed
needed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
These questions are designed to measure the
graduating seniors​
confidence level in meeting
the student outcomes after the completion of
the program. The score was from 1 to 5, with 5
as strongly confident. Satisfying answer is 2.5
or higher. Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
Responsible: (include strengths & weaknesses):
Concentration 4.3(fall) & 4.5(spring) Goal exceeded.
coordinator
and
department
chair
Completion
Date:
07/31/2015
Measure 3:
Course Exercises May include tests, final
exam, homework, projects and lab reports. The
scores are Pass and Fail.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Course
Instructor
Completion
Date:
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
ENGR 3915 90% student project
scores. Goal exceeded.
07/31/2015
Report Date: Mon Aug 17 2015
15:47:07 CDT
Close