Institutional Effectiveness Achievement Report
Engineering Technology: BS Engineering Technology Concentration in Computer ET 2014­2015 Institutional Effectiveness Achievements Report
Unit Head: Walter Boles
Reports to: College of Basic & Applied Sciences
Mission:
The Computer Engineering Technology Program will prepare graduates:
1. For careers in design, development, analysis, implementation, operation, and maintenance of electronic circuits, computer hardware, software, networking systems, and/or embedded computer systems
2. To lead teams as required, engage in self­directed continuing professional development, and join a professional society such as ASME, SAE, SME, ASEE, IEEE, etc.
Use of Prior Results : We provided tuturing for ENGR 1100 and ET 3601.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET, Inc. criteria A ­ a: an ability to select
and apply the knowledge, techniques, skills,
and modern tools of the discipline to broadly­
defined engineering technology activities.
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT)
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The average MFT results of this
outcome was 58%, above the 50%
threshold but less than what it was
last year. The reason might be that
many students do not take the MFT
seriously. We will monitor the trend
and will continue and build on the
strength of our program while
addressing any shortcoming.
Supporting Document(s):
CET­Major Field Test Assessment 7
21 2015.pdf
CET Assessment and Evaluation
Plan.pdf
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
We will look
into updating
courses,
improve
teaching and
hands­on
experience,
and add
tutoring.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
We will
revise the
assessment
instruments
as needed
and update
the
continuous
improvement
plan.
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The average result was 86%.
Students believe their education at
MTSU is excellent.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
The course­level assessment used is
ET 3601, Electrical Circuits Analysis
I. The results averaged 78.5%.
Although this is above the threshold,
however, we have established
tutoring to help students learn and
improve their scores.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Measure 3:
Course­Level Assessment Instruments
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : Assessment instruments and data collected were examined. No changes were required at this point.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET, Inc. criteria B­ b: an ability to select
and apply a knowledge of mathematics,
science, engineering, and technology to
engineering technology problems that require
the application of principles and applied
procedures or methodologies
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT)
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordiantor
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses): MFT­COEN­Survey Questions.pdf
The average MFT results of this
outcome was 56%, above the 50%
threshold but below the results from
last year. We will continue to monitor
the results and build on the strength
of our program while addressing any
shortcomings.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No changes
are needed
at this point.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Questionnaire.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordiantor
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The average result was 83%.
Students believe in their education at
MTSU.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : One of our program major strengths is in the hands­on experience. We will keep emphasizing lab activities and hands­on while using simulation when needed in all program courses involved.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET, Inc. criteria C­ c: an ability to conduct
standard tests and measurements; to
conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments;
and to apply experimental results to improve
processes;
Measure 1:
Laboratory experiments and exercises.
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties,
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses): 348431­4397206 ­ Jeremy Jackson­
The average results of this outcome Dec 10, 2014 306 PM ­ Lab7Final.pdf
was 83%. This is above the threshold
selected for this outcome. However,
emphasis on lab activities and hands­
on experience will continue to be our
top priority. Some students indicated
that computer simulation was used in
some of the labs instead of the actual
building of circuits. We will continue
to stress the importance of hands­on
lab exercises to all faculties.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
Laboratory
experince will
continue to
be our focus.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Results
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The results averaged 93%, students
believe that they are getting the
hands­on experience, which will give
them an edge in real­life and in
finding employment.
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The results averaged 61.4% for this
year, which is above the 50% set
threshold. The MFT questions come
from courses that students had one
to several semesters before they take
the exam. The results have improved
from last year and we will continue to
use means and measure to improve
student perofirmaces.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
We will more
emphasis
on using
systems
engineering
approach to
problem
solving.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : More emphasis is placed on systems engineering and design.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET, Inc. criteria D­ d: an ability to design
systems, components, or processes for
broadly­defined engineering technology
problems appropriate to program educational
objectives;
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT)
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Capstone Project
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties and
Coordinator
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Measure 3:
Survey Question are
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Results from this instrument
averaged 86%. This year we
had students who did overall
good jobs in their senior projects. A
few could not finish in time for
graduation.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
The survey reults averaged 74%.
Even though students knew how to
design and solve problems related to
systesm, they do not preceive they
have mastered this skill.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : No changes were needed, we will continue emphasizing teamwork in our courses.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET, Inc. criteria E­ e: an ability to function
effectively as a member or leader on a
technical team;
Measure 1:
Survey Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Results averaged 77%, students
believe in their abilities to function
effectively in teams because of their
academic preperation.
Supporting Document(s):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No changes
are needed
as we will
continue
emphasizing
teamwork.
We might,
however,
remove the
capstone
course as an
assessment
instrument
for this
outcome
since most
students do
their projects
individually.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Capstone Projects
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
This year, captone projects were
done individually. No group projects
and Dept.
Chair
were done this year.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Measure 3:
Course­Level Activties
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
The averaged results from this
instrument was 86%. Students
worked effectively in teams.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : No changes were needed for this outcome.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET, Inc. criteria F­ f:an ability to identify,
analyze, and solve broadly­defined
engineering technology problems;
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT)
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Results averaged 88.2% for this
instrument.
Supporting Document(s):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No changes
are needed
as all
thresholds
were met.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Capstone Projects
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The results from this instrument
averaged 83.5%. Some students
could not complete their projects
during the specified timeframe.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
86% was the average from this
instrument, very good results.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Measure 3:
Survey Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : Keep emphasizing communication skills intechnical courses.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET, Inc. criteria G­ g: an ability to apply
written, oral, and graphical communication
in both technical and nontechnical
environments; and an ability to identify and
use appropriate technical literature;
Measure 1:
Survey Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure
1.(include strengths &
weaknesses):
The resutls from this instrument
averaged 80%, very good overall.
Supporting Document(s):
1093776­4397241 ­ Christopher Humphries­
Dec 8, 2014 819 PM ­
Project_PCS_6812_Discharger_120814.pdf
1142508­4397241 ­ Teddy Brown­ Dec 6,
2014 716 PM ­ Coffee Maker Report.pdf
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
assignment,
project, etc.):
We will keep
stressing the
need to have
excellent
communication
skills in all
forms.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Capstone Projects Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure
2: (include strengths &
weaknesses):
84% was the average from this instrument, well above the threshold
but less than what we had
previously. Several students could not finish their work during the time
frame set.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Measure 3:
Corse Level Activities
Person(s)
Analysis of Results for Measure
Responsible: 3: (include strengths &
Program
Faculties,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
weaknesses)
The results from this instruments
averaged 82.5%, within the
expected range and above the
threshold.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : No changes were made based on prior results
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET, Inc. criteria H­ h: an understanding of
the need for and an ability to engage in self­
directed continuing professional development;
Measure 1:
Survey Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The resutls from this instrument
averaged 80%, showing that students
are confident to pursue life­long
learning.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
We will keep
emphasizing
the
importance
of continuous
professional
development.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Capestone Projects
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The results averaged 86% as
students showed that they can be
autonomous learners, using different
search tools and techniques. A few
pursued their higher ed as well.
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The results averaged 87.5% for this
assessment instrument indicating
that students have acquired adequate
instructions in ethics and diversity.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
We continue
to stress
ethics and
diversity in
our
curriculum.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : No changes were made, results were satisfactory.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET, Inc. criteria I­ i: an understanding of
and a commitment to address professional
and ethical responsibilities including a respect
for diversity;
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT)
Person(s)
Responsible:
Pogram
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The results averaged 88%, well
above the threshold.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
The average was 91.5%, well above
the threshold.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Measure 3:
Course­Level Activities
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : No changes were made based on the prior results.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET, Inc. criteria J­ j: a knowledge of the
impact of engineering technology solutions in
a societal and global context.
Measure 1:
Survey Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The results averaged 91% for this
instrument showing that students
understand the impact of engineering
solutions on society locally and
globally.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
As
enegineeing
tech
solutions are
more and
more
invloved in
our daily
lives, we will
continue to
stress the
impact of
such
solutions on
society.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Capstone Projects
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
90% was the average from this
instrument. Students understand the
impact of engineering solutions on
society.
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The results averaged 88%, showing
that students understand the
importance of timeliness, quality, and
continuous improvement.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
No future
actions are
needed at
this point.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : No changes were proposed.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET, Inc. criteria K­ k: a commitment to
quality, timeliness, and continuous
improvement.
Measure 1:
Survey Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Course­Level Activities
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
Results averaged 91% showing that
students understand the need of
timeliness and quality in their work
and the importance of continually
improving.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
The results from this instrument
averaged 80%. Several students
could not finish their work on time
due to various reasons.
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The average form this instrument was
52.1%, although above the threshold,
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Measure 3:
Capstone Projects
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : Emphasis was placed on real­life applications as related to the above areas in all related courses.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET CET discipline­specific outcome 1:
The application of electric circuits, computer
programming, associated software
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT)
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
applications, analog and digital electronics,
microcomputers, operating systems, local
area networks, and engineering standards to
the building, testing, operation, and
maintenance of computer systems and
associated software systems.
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
however, it is lower than expected.
This could be attributed to students
not taking the MFT seriously or not
well prepared for it.
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
Students will
be prepped
for the MFT
and
emphasis will
be placed on
doing well in
the exam.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
88% of the students felt very
confident that they have mastered
this outcome.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Measure 3:
Course­Level Assessment
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculty,
Program
Coordinator,
Dept. Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
The assessment results averaged
92.5%, well above the threshold
showing strength in this outcome.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : No major changes in the curriculum were introduced. However, tutoring was provided.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET CET discipline­specific outcome 2:
The application of natural sciences and
mathematics at or above the level of algebra
and trigonometry to the building, testing,
operation, and maintenance of computer
systems and associated software systems.
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT)
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The average was 59.8%, above the
threshold but lacks the strength in
attaining this outcome.
Supporting Document(s):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
MFT prep will
be provided.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The average was 73%, most
students felt confident that they have
attained this outcome.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
The avergae was 87.6%, well above
the threshold.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Measure 3:
Course­level Assessment
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : Project­based learning was emphasized.
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET CET discipline­specific outcome 3:
The ability to analyze, design, and
implement hardware and software computer
systems.
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT)
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The average was 69.93%, very good
and above threshold Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project, etc.):
Curriculum will
be examined
for any
possible
improvements.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Survey Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The average was 93%, students felt
very confident that they have
mastered this outcome.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
The average of the results was
86.5%, well above the threshold.
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Measure 3:
Course­Level Assessment
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : Concepts of Project Management related to this outcome were stressed in the curriculum. Student Learning Outcome:
ABET CET discipline­specific outcome 4:
The ability to apply project management
techniques to computer systems.
Measure 1:
Major Field Test (MFT)
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculty,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1. Supporting Document(s):
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The results averaged 37.5%, well
below the threshold. We will examine
the cause of this as it could be in the
reporting or calculation of the results.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
We will
examine the
MFT part
related to
this outcome
very closely
since the
results from
that
instrument
contradict
course­level
assessment.
Problems will
be identifed
and
addressed.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Surevy Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
77% was the average from this
instrument.
Analysis of Results for Measure 3:
(include strengths & weaknesses)
The results averaged 90%, and this
is well above the threshold and
shows strength in attaining this
outcomes. Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Measure 3:
Course­Level Assessment
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Faculties,
Program
Coordinator,
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Use of Prior Results : None
Student Learning Outcome:
ABET CET discipline­specific outcome 5: The
ability to utilize statistics/probability,
transform methods, discrete mathematics, or
applied differential equations in support of
computer systems and networks.
Measure 1:
Survey Questionnaire
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Analysis of Results for Measure 1.
(include strengths & weaknesses):
82% of the students felt that they
have mastered this outcome.
Supporting Document(s):
Future
Actions
:Describe
Program
Changes
(adding a
course,
assignment,
project,
etc.):
Curriculum
will be
examined
closely to
make sure
that this
outcome is
attained.
Future
Actions
:Describe
Assessment
Changes
(measures
such as
rubrics,
exams,
diagnostic
instruments,
etc.):
Future
Actions
:Describe
any
additional
resources
needed
(Leave blank
if no
additional
resources
are
needed.):
Measure 2:
Course­Level Assessment
Person(s)
Responsible:
Program
Coordinator
and Dept.
Chair
Completion
Date:
05/30/2015
Report Date: Wed Aug 26 2015
11:51:20 CDT
Analysis of Results for Measure 2:
(include strengths & weaknesses):
The average was 76.7%, above the
threshold.
Close