Buildings, Infrastructure & Land: Toward a Capital Vision www.usask.ca University Council

advertisement
Buildings, Infrastructure & Land:
Toward a Capital Vision
University Council
October 20, 2011
www.usask.ca
Major Capital Project Planning Process
& Project Governance Model
www.usask.ca
Mind Map - Capital Vision
www.usask.ca
Capital Vision
• Create an overarching, principle-based
document to manage all U of S owned
urban lands
• Provide framework for considering
decisions pertaining to strategic directions
• Create structure for a long-range
development plan, defined by precincts
www.usask.ca
Categories of Development
•Infrastructure
•Buildings
•Land Development
www.usask.ca
Infrastructure:
www.usask.ca
Buildings:
1999 to 2005
www.usask.ca
Buildings:
2006 to current
www.usask.ca
Future Buildings
• Beef Cattle Research & Teaching Unit
• Cyclotron
• Dairy Research Facility
• Gordon Oakes Red-Bear Student Centre
• RenewUS – Potential Scope:
• Arts, Biology, Murray Building, Physics
• Infrastructure Renewal (utilities, municipal, ICT and eMAP)
• Children’s Hospital of Saskatchewan at RUH
www.usask.ca
RenewUS: Context



Nearing the end of an historic decade ~$1B capital
expansion, with some renewal
Growing deferred maintenance backlog in existing
buildings and infrastructure
Mixed success in securing funding for deferred
maintenance and infrastructure
•
•
Positives: e.g., KIP rooftops; Health Sciences A and B Wings;
Place Riel; Marquis Hall; Feedwater Expansion
Negatives: decline in grant amidst construction inflation;
DM funding bottom quartile vs. peer universities
www.usask.ca
Peer funding comparison
www.usask.ca
Source: APPA Facility Performance Indicators Report (2009-10); FMD analysis
Sustaining Capital Grant
(SCG)
Flat/declining funding amidst
doubling of construction costs
www.usask.ca
In search of “Best Practices”: Case Studies
 Institutional priority
 Major campaigns
($100M-$1B; 5 to 20+
years)
 Multiple funding sources
 Comprehensive building
renovation with
programmatic renewal vs.
priority systems
 Tackle DM, but continue
to invest in regular
maintenance
www.usask.ca
www.usask.ca
Source: FMD ReCAPP database
Notes: Facility Condition Index (FCI) is deferred maintenance relative to current replacement value. FCI figures are based on
assessments completed between 2001 and 2006, escalated to reflect an estimate of current market costs.
RenewUS
 After a decade of growth, renew our focus on
the core campus
 Stem – or reverse - the DM tide
 $250M+ over 5 years
 Multiple funding sources (gov’t, donors,
students, university)
 Focus on high priority academic programs
and buildings, and critical infrastructure
www.usask.ca
Land Development:
www.usask.ca
Download