Large Deviations for partition functions. (...and for other polymer related quantities) Nicos Georgiou Department of Mathematics, UW - Madison Joint work with Timo Seppäläinen Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Layout 1 Inroduction and Results. Quadrant directed polymers The Results Boundary log -gamma model Burke Property Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Layout 1 Inroduction and Results. Quadrant directed polymers The Results Boundary log -gamma model Burke Property 2 The proofs. Decomposition and Burke Estimation Thank you note ! Inversion Proofs for unconstrained endpoint model Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Directed polymer in space-time random environment Nearest neighbor, up-right path (x(u)), u ∈ N2 . “Space-time” environment {ω(u) : u ∈ N2 }. n Π(m, n) = Up-right paths (xm,n ) from (1, 1) to (m, n). Quenched probability measure on the paths m Qm,n {xm,n (·)} = 1 Zm,n n exp β X u∈xm,n (·) Inverse temperature β > 0 (set to be 1 for the majority of the talk) . The normalizing constant Zm,n is the partition function, given by n X o X Zm,n = exp β ω(u) x∈Π(m,n) u∈x(·) P is the probability distribution on the environment ω, {ω(u)} i.i.d. Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. o ω(u) Questions and previous results Question: Large deviations or Concentration Inequalities for the partition function. Concentration Inequalities: 1 2 3 Carmona - Hu: Order n concentration inequality (Gaussian environment) Comets - Shiga - Yoshida: Order n1/3 concentration inequality. Liu - Watbled: Order n concentration inequality. Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Questions and previous results Question: Large deviations or Concentration Inequalities for the partition function. Concentration Inequalities: 1 2 3 Carmona - Hu: Order n concentration inequality (Gaussian environment) Comets - Shiga - Yoshida: Order n1/3 concentration inequality. Liu - Watbled: Order n concentration inequality. Large deviations. 1 2 Carmona - Hu: Upper and lower tails normalizations (Gaussian environment) Ben-Ari: Lower tail large deviation regimes. Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Questions and previous results Question: Large deviations or Concentration Inequalities for the partition function. Concentration Inequalities: 1 2 3 Carmona - Hu: Order n concentration inequality (Gaussian environment) Comets - Shiga - Yoshida: Order n1/3 concentration inequality. Liu - Watbled: Order n concentration inequality. Large deviations. 1 2 Carmona - Hu: Upper and lower tails normalizations (Gaussian environment) Ben-Ari: Lower tail large deviation regimes. Explicit rate functions for partition functions ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Existence of Rate functions Assumptions: d-dimensional rectangle (only steps parallel to the positive axes are allowed). General i.i.d. weights, so that a ξ > 0 that depends on the distributions of the weights ω exists, such that E e ξ|ω(u)| < ∞. β < ξ. Theorem For t > 0, u ∈ Rd+ and r ∈ R there exists a nonnegative function that satisfies β Juβ (r ) = − lim n−1 log P{log Zbnuc ≥ nr }. n→∞ J is convex in the variable (u, r ). The rate function is continuous in (u, r ) where it is finite. Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Log-Gamma Model Dimension 1 + 1 I.i.d. weights, with distributions ω(i, j) ∼ log Yi,j , −1 where Yi,j ∼ Gamma(µ) Gamma density: Γ(µ)−1 x µ−1 e −x The partition function satisfies a law of large numbers: lim n−1 log Zbnsc,bntc = fµ (s, t). n→∞ Js,t (r ) = − lim n−1 log P{log Zbnsc,bntc ≥ nr }. n→∞ Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Results - The log-gamma rate function (fixed endpoint) Definitions: For 0 < ξ < (µ + ξ)/2 ≤ θ < µ, define hξ (θ) = log Γ(µ − θ) − log Γ(µ − θ + ξ). dξ (θ) = log Γ(θ − ξ) − log Γ(θ). Theorem Let r ∈ R, 0 ≤ s ≤ t. Then Js,t (r ) = sup sup ξ∈[0,µ) hξ ((µ+ξ)/2)≤v = sup ξ∈[0,µ) rξ − (r , −s) · (ξ, v ) − t(dξ ◦ hξ−1 )(v ) , inf {shξ (θ) + tdξ (θ)} , θ∈[(µ+ξ)/2,µ) The function Js,t (r ) is strictly positive for r > r0 = fµ (s, t). Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Results - The log-gamma rate function (free endpoint) Let s > 0. The free-endpoint directed polymer model has partition function n X o X tot = exp ω(u) Zbnsc x:bnsc-paths x u∈x(·) Theorem Let r ∈ R, s > 0. Then tot Jstot (r ) = − lim n−1 log P{log Zbnsc ≥ nr } n→∞ = Js/2,s/2 (r ). Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Results - Exit point and Path Chain Quenched LDP Theorem (Exit point LDP) Let 0 < t < 1 and consider (t, 1 − t) ∈ R2+ . For n ∈ N let [n(t, 1 − t)] = (bntc, n − bntc) and denote by xn the last point of the polymer chain x0,n . Then fµ (1/2, 1/2) − fµ (t, 1 − t) = − lim n−1 log Qnω {xn = [n(t, 1 − t)]}. n→∞ This readily leads to the following path large deviations. Theorem (Polymer chain LDP) Let γ(t) : [0, 1] 7→ R2+ be a non decreasing Lipschitz-1 curve with γ(0) = 0 and let ε > 0 and Nε (γ) an ε-neighborhood of γ. Let kγ(1)k1 = 1 . Then, Z fµ (1/2, 1/2) − 1 fµ (γ 0 (t)) dt = − lim lim n−1 log Qnω x0,n ∈ nNε (γ) . ε→0 n→∞ 0 Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Computational tool: Log-gamma polymer with boundary Define multiplicative weights Yi,j = e ω(i,j) independent. Environment (distribution P) Horizontal Weights U −1 −1 Yi,0 = Ui,0 ∼ Gamma(θ) Vertical Weights V −1 −1 Y0,j = V0,j ∼ Gamma(µ − θ) Gamma(µ) density: Γ(µ)−1 x µ−1 e −x . Bulk Weights Y −1 Yi,j ∼ Gamma(µ) This model allows specific calculations. Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Computational tool: Log-gamma polymer with boundary Define multiplicative weights Yi,j = e ω(i,j) independent. Environment (distribution P) Horizontal Weights U −1 −1 Yi,0 = Ui,0 ∼ Gamma(θ) Vertical Weights V −1 −1 Y0,j = V0,j ∼ Gamma(µ − θ) Gamma(µ) density: Γ(µ)−1 x µ−1 e −x . Bulk Weights Y −1 Yi,j ∼ Gamma(µ) This model allows specific calculations. Reason: Burke property. Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Burke Property for the boundary model. V0,j Yi,j Given initial weights (i, j ∈ N) −1 Ui,0 ∼ Gamma(θ) V0,−1j ∼ Gamma(µ − θ) 0 1 Ui,0 Yi,−1 j ∼ Gamma(µ) 0 Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Burke Property for the boundary model. V0,j Given initial weights (i, j ∈ N) Yi,j −1 Ui,0 ∼ Gamma(θ) V0,−1j ∼ Gamma(µ − θ) 0 1 Yi,−1 j ∼ Gamma(µ) Ui,0 0 Compute Zm,n for all (m, n) ∈ Z2+ and then define Um,n = Zm,n Zm−1,n Vm,n = Zm,n Zm,n−1 Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Xm,n = Z Zm,n −1 m,n + Zm+1,n Zm,n+1 Large Deviations for partition functions. Burke Property for the boundary model. V0,j Given initial weights (i, j ∈ N) Yi,j −1 Ui,0 ∼ Gamma(θ) V0,−1j ∼ Gamma(µ − θ) 0 1 Yi,−1 j ∼ Gamma(µ) Ui,0 0 Compute Zm,n for all (m, n) ∈ Z2+ and then define Um,n = Zm,n Zm−1,n Vm,n = Zm,n Zm,n−1 ( For an undirected edge f : Tf = Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Xm,n = Ux Vx Z Zm,n −1 m,n + Zm+1,n Zm,n+1 f = {x − e1 , x} f = {x − e2 , x} Large Deviations for partition functions. Burke Property down-right path (zk ) with edges fk = {zk−1 , zk }, k ∈ Z interior points I of path (zk ) Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Burke Property down-right path (zk ) with edges fk = {zk−1 , zk }, k ∈ Z interior points I of path (zk ) Theorem Variables {Tfk , Xz : k ∈ Z, z ∈ I } are independent with marginals U −1 ∼ Gamma(θ), V −1 ∼ Gamma(µ − θ), and X −1 ∼ Gamma(µ). Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Idea of Proof - Decomposition We start by decomposing Zbnsc,bntc according to the exit point of the polymer path from the boundary: The shaded part represents the partition function conditioned on (0, l) being the exit point of the polymer path from the boundary. bntc l Y l 1 0 0 1 bnsc Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison V0,j Z(1,l) (bnsc, bntc) j=1 Large Deviations for partition functions. Idea of Proof - Decomposition Zbnsc,bntc = X bnsc+bntc Y x· = Yxj j=1 bntc l X Y l=1 V0,j Z(1,l) (bnsc, bntc) + j=1 bnsc k X Y Ui,0 Z(k,1) (bnsc, bntc) . i=1 k=1 Consequence of the Burke Property: bntc Zbnsc,bntc = Y j=1 Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison bnsc V0,j Y Ui,bntc i=1 Large Deviations for partition functions. Idea of Proof - Burke Trick Divide both sides by bnsc Y Ui,bntc = i=1 Qbntc j=1 bntc bntc X Y l=1 V0,j : −1 V0,j Z(1,l) (bnsc, bntc) j=l+1 bnsc bntc + X Y k=1 j=1 −1 V0,j k Y Ui,0 (bnsc, bntc) Z(k,1) i=1 bnsc = X ηk Zk (bnsc, bntc). k=−bntc k6=0 Here we defined bntc Y −1 V0,j , j=−k ηk = η−1 , k Y η Ui,0 , 0 for − bntc ≤ k ≤ −1, k=0 for 0 < k ≤ bnsc, i=1 Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. . Idea of Proof - Estimation bnsc ( Rs (r ) = − lim n −1 n→∞ log P log ∼ −n ) Ui,bntc ≥ nr i=1 bnsc ( −1 Y log P log ) X ηk Zk (bnsc, bntc) ≥ nr k=−bntc k6=0 ∼ −n−1 log P{max log ηk Zk (bnsc, bntc) ≥ nr } k ∼ −n ∼ −1 inf max log P{log ηk + log Zk (bnsc, bntc) ≥ nr } k a inf {κa (x) + Js,t (r − x)} −t≤a≤s x∈R Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Thank You... Questions & Comments ? Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Idea of Proof - Inversion Rs∗ (ξ) = sup a ∗ κ∗a (ξ) + (Js,t ) (ξ) a ∗ au(θ) − (−(Js,t ) (ξ)) −t≤a≤s F s (θ, ξ) = sup −t≤a≤s magic F t (u −1 (v ), ξ) = sup 0≤a≤t t F (u −1 t −1 (v ), ξ) = sup a ∗ av − (−(Jt,t ) (ξ)) av − Gξ (a) 0≤a≤t F (u (v ), ξ) = Gξ∗ (v ) Then, a a ∗ Jt,t (r ) = sup {r ξ − (Jt,t ) (ξ)} ξ∈[0,µ) = sup {r ξ + Gξ (a)} ξ∈[0,µ) = sup sup{r ξ + av − Gξ∗ (v )}. ξ∈[0,µ) v ∈R Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions. Proof for unconstrained endpoint model tot log Zbn s c,bnsc−bn s c ≤ log Zbnsc ≤ 2 2 ≤ log(ns + 1) + log max Zk,bnsc−k . k bnsc After some estimates, this translates to the rate functions: inf Ja,s−a (r ) ≤ Jstot (r ) ≤ Js/2,s/2 (r ). bnsc − k 0≤a≤s k bnsc Use convexity of the point-to-point rate functions to get that Js/2,s/2 (r ) ≤ inf Ja,s−a (r ). 0≤a≤s Nicos Georgiou, UW -Madison Large Deviations for partition functions.