Available
online
www.sciencedirect.com
at
LANDSCAPE
ScienceDirect
AND
URBAN PLANNING
________
ELSE\TIER
and
Landscape
Urban
2007
80
Planning
292
300
This
article
simulation study of thinning and fuel treatments
wildiandurban
Agera Andrew
Alan
USDA
INTECS
Forest
Service
International
Forestry
Forest
Inc
Mountain
Rocky
James
and Range
Lab
Sciences
Technology
District
Research
in eastern
McMahant
Health
Ranger
Sandpoint
interface
1500
Station
Lab
Sciences
Fire
Available
online
/50A
1/0
Suite
f/wy
5775
Hwy
Ave
10
West
USA
USA
USA
MT
Missoulu
on
CO 80526
Fort Collins
II 83864-9509
landurbplan
McHughd
OR 97850
La Grunde
Centre
Sandpoint
December
13
Lane
Gekeler
Team
at
online
locate
ier.com
USA
Oregon
Barrettc Charles
140
Enterprie
also available
is
w.else
59808
USA
2006
Abstract
We
The
simulated
is
wildfire
behavior
substantial
predicted
the
2006
B.V
Elsevier
Keywords
and
information
All
fire
and
other
time
for
specific
noted
forest
scenario
Fuels
Stand
treatment
density
FVS
index
and
the
terms
and
for
States
stand
show
structures
Omi
Omi 2002
of
sibility
many
rate
these
factors
and
resilient
to
1998
Negron
and
1998
Stephens
at
climate
disturbances
Although
can
create
Popp
scales
vegetation
is
and
considerations
key
insects
2004
Pollet
and
fea-
dependent
on
dynamics
operational
case
desired
and
wildfire
the effectiveness
larger
arrangement
spatial
financial
treatment
and
resource
resource
spp
management
values
must
E-mail
address
0169-2046/S
see
author
Tel
541
aager@fs.fed.us
front
matter
016/j.landurbplan.2006
278
3740
fax
541
278
3730
The
of surface
fuels
United
that
models
Fire
Substantial
provided
study
Western
the
potential
indicated
whole
as
treatment
in
models
simulation
of
template
States
2006
Elsevier
By
All
rights
he
also
as
forests
complex
is
et
and
fire
considered
hark
at 2004
and
Mitchell
forest
in
planning
problem
spatiotemporal
Interactions
Dendroctonus
beetles
1980
Martin
disturbance-prone
warrants
that
atten
tion
We
simulated
wildlandurhan
USA
The
with
of
by
high
Grande
loadings
treatment
national
issues
decades
rate
forest
density
at
ct
is
exclusion
We
at 2001
examined
required
density
them
over
scale
to
are
five
following
achieve
well
address
the
the
fuel
multiple
How
prescriptions
What
and
for the
time
in
ladder
simulated
guidelines
management
the stand
fire
and
The
initiated
areas
many
surface
homes
fires
was
project
Like
high
of
of
extreme
for
potential
OR
Mount
the
intermingling
treatment
have
on
Grande
identified
the
District
and
alternatives
used
the
Quigley
epidemics
widely
of
forests
from
resulting
management
Ranger
because
fuel
La
near
District
Ranger
the
scenarios
management
WUI
and
extensive
Mountains
insect
risk
vegetation
an
La
the
Blue
Grande
as
forest
design
forest
interface
La
Emily area
behavior
A.A Ager
such
The problem of long-term
maintain
Corresponding
10.1
issues
sustainability
time and examined
landscape
scenarios
disturbances
What
doi
and
of thinning
Grande Oregon
and
health
Wildfire
in
strategies
natural
treatments
and
exam-
closely
condition
forest
health
forest
management
from
Western
the
have
more
treatments
including
type
constraints
are
that
and
of
impacts
future
stand-scale
that
Kalabodkidis
and
the
of
studies
become
have
throughout
range
few
effectiveness
desired
achieving
studies
wide
However
mitigating
treatments
managers
address
to
tong-term
of
reduction
fuel
forest
issues
sustainability
med
and
thinning
priority
United
for the
guidelines
La
near
forest
through
area The
study
no-treatment
fuel
among
high
scenarios
the
result
as
to address
Finney and Cohen 2002 Schoennagel
Introduction
Forest
density
versus
thinning
forest
lands
management
over
Blue Mountains
the
in
managed
characteristics
weather
with
interface
Federally
benchmark
desired
for the
concerned
planners
of
forest
meet
to
and
private
number
were
activity
characteristics
for forest
both
modeled
over
wildiandurban
16000-ha
on
reserved
rights
simulation
Landscape
We
thinning
crown
in
on
treatments
composition
species
other
fuels
wildfire
repeated
and
structure
methods
modeling
require
reductions
significant
in stand
changes
structure
would
area
and
risk of severe
stand
activities
management
for thinning
targeted
and reduce
concerns
forest
long-term
area
study
net
and
do
fire
effects
reserved
10.009
00022
A.A Ager
of
treatments
long-term
on
fire
al
et
forest
behavior
and Urban
/Landscape
and
structure
grandis
larch
Materials
and
methods
area
Mountain
long
immediately
forested
to
the
For
slopes of
lands
6343
ha
ha
used
state
of
in
the
the
Plans Approximately
est
The
Service
ponderosa
the
in
pine
and
exceed
30 km
area
where
Oregon
ofdead
loading
ladder
accumulations
the
fuels
accelerated
budworm Choristoneura
Grande Ronde
Valley
Fig
extensive
was
established
breaks
natural
and
in
area
is
owned
Wallowa-Whitman
and
managed
by
forest
composition
ranges
Pinus
ponderosa
cold
and
the
forests
Engclmann
2.2
Fig
based
mortality within
the
stands
western
project
high
Fuel
spruce
caused
that
epidemic
in the
stands
fuel
area
andfuel data
Vegetation
GIS layers on
the
Forest
USDA
dry
side
For-
forests
dominated
density
by
using data
of
La Grande Ranger District Stands
by
and
species
aerial
We
2.5
database
built
cm
digitized
diameter
color
photos
taken
by using
consisting
class
for
each
out-
digital
of stand
stand
by
and photo-interpretation
from stand exams
obtained
2000
were
boundary
from 2000
orthophotos
from existing vegetation
were obtained
at the
file
the Forest Service
of
P/ecu
spruce
delineations
Stand
on
Umatilla
from
occidentalis
Lynx
with
areas
19801986
for
Surface
scenery
some
for
range
Lynx
for
number ofthe
alarge
the
managed
contained
lands
forested
in
are
western
the
vegetation
the area within
privately
is
around
and
tonnes/ha
in
and
and winter
habitat
elaphus
after
descend
Abies lasiocarpa
subalpine-fir
an
l4Ometric
ridges
study
9432 ha
is
Cervus
lands
summer
Abies
fir
grand
menziesii
growth recreation
adjacent
boundaries
of federal
12259
definitions
Grande
major drainages
following
interface
Emily and
boundary
purposes
land ownership
About
La
of
Mount
agricultural
analysis
area
and
north
urban
containing
Forest Service
including
elk
old
zone
Pseudotsuga
Larix occidentalis
canadensis
Emily wildland
293
transition
Douglas-fir
loadings
The Mount
and
number of resources
Rocky
Study
292300
2007
engelmannii
composition
species
80
Planning
in
1998
..
OeJ
kho
4Ur%aIIJati6iaI
Jj
.-
S%
.
J.FS
..
I-
VV
atioW
_--Fig
Vicinity
managed
by
map
ofthe
the Forest
Mount
Service
PV
F.n1ily
denotes
aica
hm
privately
ing study
owned
ari
land
MIes
aiid
and
Seeral
oncrhip
snuU
tracts
hoLlildarks
owned
by
the
Hold
State
hi
inc
indiiies
ofOregon
within
lII1y
the
area
study
boundary FS
area
are
not
denotes
lands
shown
00023
294
A.A Ager
data
Stand-specific
several
ways The
were estimated
area
for
opment
stand
data
local
six
on
stands
to
aerial
within
stand
this
transect
series
TPH
SDI
to
where TPH1
well
We
simulated
fuel
high
the
1992
65%
the
and
Fire
Simulator
FVS-PPE
Fuels
The FVS-PPE
2003
by using the Blue
dynamics
Extension
Processing
and
stand
Forest Vegetation
Mountains
to
the
we
in
i.e
before
simulation
the
to
cycling
Upper Grande Ronde
State
Oregon
OR
lis
was used
from
obtained
We
steps
fuel
1991
FFE
Maguire
as
2000
year
and
were simulated
the
we
decades
regeneration
in
ending
with
Fire
the
We
for
2002
year
reported
the
for the
data
decadal
2070
the
in
initial
For
the
the
over
selected output
for
averages
summing
variables
decadal
postthin
as
other
year of
first
SDI
in
dividing
by
70
tive
simulated
thinning
fling
with
repeated
thereafter
on
private
included
extensive
these
burns
only
lands
scenarios
use of
The thinning
1933
the
the
THNP
with
fire
on
wildland
five
with
decade
relative
removal
of
the stand
Warm
2.5
pine
of
thinning
at
max-
the
efficiency
each
in
The thinning
thinned
prescriptions
like
species
seral
early
and
larch
grand
defined
The
Douglas-fir
which
group
by
species
are
1998
Hall
such
species
aggre
Preferred
are
larch
Englcmann
larch
fir
spruce grand
pine Douglas-fir
ponderosa
dryponderosa pine
larch
western
Douglas-fir
and fuels modeling
Fire
Crookston
2003
and
of
1976
by
ter
mechanical
ists
only
NOTRT
because
the
on
index
the
moisture
fuel
40%
and
diameter
the
fuel
fuel
Emily
site
of
the
guidelines
for
fall
scrutinized
alization
then
mortality
years
after
System
averaged
Station
the
the
351314
than
for
commu
1997
of
by
fuel
Table
following
in
special-
Johnson
burning
thinning
model
hundred
the
ensure
Stand
that
was
stands
Visu
overstory
trees/ha
simulating
Station
Black
list
90%
cm diame
underburn
to
the
by using weather
in several
about
J-Ridge
and
year
The
tree
postburn
McGaughey
less
the
underburns
by simulating
examining
were derived from
tam
for
each
reduction
of
2.57.6
provided
District
onset
by using
fuel
removal
was simulated
removal
the underhurning
the
SDI
of surface
Mount
simulated
La Grande Ranger
scheduled
and
stands
we
fuels Underburning
the
the
for
database
vegetation
La Grande Ranger District personal communication
We
subject
as
the
by
Scott
the
FFE
in
La Grande Ranger District personal
cm
and
in
data
and
and
behavior
fire
initialized
treatment
Specifically
surface
fuel
developed
1986
Andrews
were
parameters
Wallace
conditions
relationships
model surface
to
surface
the
using
7.614.8
uses
and
dynamics
fuel
FVS FFE Reinhardt and
the
1977
Fuel loadings
fires
simulated
FFE
The
down
and
with
Van Wagner
2001
Reinhardt
crown
nication
and
and
dead
effects
fire
were simulated
the
thin-
implemented
measure of density where
small-
effective
35%
trees
fire-intolerant
associations
plant
Potential
and
is
the
favoring
western
underburns
no treatments
density
crop
trees
stands
Weather conditions
used
10% of
late-seral
Cold drywestern
We
interface
that
differed by plant association
species
debate
prescription
for
leave
THNBRN
underburning
urban
were retained
gates
the
scenarios
the
with
scenario
next
the
underburning
no treatment
without
selec-
underburning
until
THNBRN
THN
of
followed
scenario
years
first
and
and
consisted
that
we modeled
thinning
THNBRN
of considerable
Reineke
for
10
10 years
every
the
SO
same operational
treatment
every
treatments
simulated
on
fuel
THN
thinning
maintenance
scenario
mechanical
underburns
Using
treatments
and depending
thinning
maintenance
stand-level
FVS
an
from
were
to
exceeded
SDI
stands
treatments
used
Clausnitzer
was ordered
trees
were thinned
We
stand
the
of
ponderosa
project
We
fuels Stands
90%
of
We
and prescriptions
scenarios
of
and
La Grande Ranger
the
on
FVS when
in
the thinning
that
mixed-species
stand
Treatment
for
2003
class
Albini
years
2.4
so
Johnson
1998
guidelines
thin
triggered
preferences
prethin
all
were calculated by
and
outputs
Blue
association
plant
time
eachdecadeFVSexecutesthinninginthefirstyearofthecycle
Yearly
Hall
and
species
Surface
annual
2000
condition
postthin
time
and Fuels Extension
year
class
in the
model
survey
on
both
reported
conditions
postthin
1994
Cool moistwestern
dynamics
tree
thinning
ladder
Dixon
Corval
This regeneration
forest
vegetation
and reported by decade
well
model
Report
FVS Reinhardt and Crookston 2003 on
to
model
regeneration
Unpublished
DBH
ith
established
period
of Forest Sciences
simulations
the
extensive
each
regeneration
Department
forest
in
starting
forest
period
the
been
Lash-
parallel
stands
all
have
target
Crookston
La Grande Ranger District
the
simulated
dynamics
steps
for
from
for
watershed
University
was developed
as
next
the
by Wilson and
developed
the
completed
is
of
trees/ha
SDI
maximum Removal
largest
reducing
fir
ion
of the
targeted
multiple stands
al
et
Following
to
size
and
Reinhardt
SDI
Parallel
and Stage
Crookston
Extension
simulates
linked
for
each
for
Cochran
imurri
of
number of
values
procedure
est
variant
tree
The
25
the
is
Mountains
overview
Modeling
DBH
hole height
of
sampling
District
2.3
reference
at
density
cm
as
stands
forest
into
137
at
FVS Stage 1968 as
by
Maximum
forextremely
old
the
calculated
is
diameter
stand
as
1992
and Wordell
cm
of 25
converted
is
existing density
size
292300
2007
80
Planning
process
the photo
to
structure
Line
series
of
many
In
were then extrapolated
conditions
the photo
devel-
prescription
project
in
of the study
photo-interpretation
and
Hilbruner
the
of
part
loadings
by using
calibrate
1500 ha
were matched
fuel
of stand
found
loadings
as
and Urban
/Landscape
were derived
loadings
reduction
association
plant
by using
used
field
fuel
These
stands
knowledge
was
the
conditions
fuel
1981
the remaining
exam
in
fuel
on about
loadings
proposed
surface
of Fischer
on surface
fuel
al
et
potential
351414
Mountain
wildfire
effects
Black
Moun
Station
351317
00024
A.A Ager
al
et
and Urban
Landscape
Table
default
Weather
and
moisture
fuel
used
parameters
in
and
wildfire
potential
292300
2007
80
Planning
cation
Wildfire
Underburn
canopy
322
21.1
used
an
in
parameters
prescribed
295
to
attempt
structural
replicate
Mountains
the Blue
in
classifi
we
Specifically
adjusted
simulations
fire
the
_______________________________________________________
Variable
TemperatureC
I-h
10-h
1000-h
Live
cm
cm
7.62 cm
et
2.547.62
fuel
fuel
woody
above
Values
from
for
local
not
20
are
station
calculation
weather
percentile
data
Underburn
of
See
conditions
conditions
Section
and
details
from
on
of wind
velocity
3.1
calculated
were
obtained
additional
for
values
percentile
and
were
tions
40km
weather
16km
located
south
of
the
September from
Plus
Family
upper
Table
Plus
by
National
to
model
the
and
to
10
J-Ridge
2002
NA
data
windspeed
Oceanic
and
gust
http//www.wrh
Atmospheric
windspeed
in
than
noaa.gov/sew/fire/olm/fire/
in
and
Forest structure
We
narios
forest
analyzed
by using canopy
FVS Crookston
into
and
and
Stage
thinning
in
NOAA
THNBRN
extensive
underburn
decade
Table
declined
The
THN
m3
in the
THNBRNI
removed
scenarios
wood compared
SDI
to
et
structure
al 1996
for the
see-
classification
built
were made
1999 Changes
off
tapered
periods
in
which
small
vol
thin
THNP
The
amounts of
other scenarios
the
stabilized
at
87%
about
Fig
decreased
to
at
each
amount of
large
relatively
second
the
decade
per
to
scenario
treatment
after
thinning
first
after
removed
scenario
main-
was reduced
burning
114307469982m3
to
and
of
ha/year
Table
area
THNBRN
The
treatments
most of the study area received
471
and decadal
area thinned
the
that
treatment
treated
forested
the
stands
all
in the
by underburning
decade
and
Otogust.htm
3.8% of
or
period
3648%
of
the
THN and THNBRN alternatives
Fig
NOTRT scenario increased until about
OHara
stand
for
1.4% of the forested area
or
ha/year
umes
composition
structure
called
was followed
underburns
Average
2.6
FVS
basal
average
development
and on average
decade
first
wood 1099203
velocities
average
the
simulation
resulted
mois-
developed
Administration
rather
177
Fire-
generated
tables
which
scenario
thinning
tenance
to
in
the
When
generate
fuel
ha
over
sta-
June
to
and
windspeed
average
for
2000
were adjusted upward by using
actual
in tree
Changes
for
exceeded 65% of the maximum SDI resulted
located
is
were analyzed
McCormick
mm
station
and stand
areas
THN
The
weather
gusts
Mountain
Black
Weather
area
temperature
The
FireFamily
and
years 1986
Bradshaw
The
stations
east
project
the
97th-percentile
ture
1990
to
Wales
in
by creating
analyzed
Crookston
class
by species
Treatment
8090
automated
are
tree
2007
al
et
was
time
from 63.5
structure
large
fuel
applicable
remote
variables
the
Results
Mountains
Blue
m2
area
over
forest
to
NA
10.7
97th
wildfire
data and
station
125
20
old
as
the threshold
decreasing
at
weather
in the
specialists
64
kmlh
gusts
Monitor
Event
kmlh
ground
qualify
composition
species
windspeed
Maximum wind
to
This corresponds
minimum
the
increasing
and
volume and Hemstrom
al this
20
fuel
average
6.1
stratum
21 in
20%
to
10
Duff%
10-mm
of
layer by
canopy
from
closure
53.3cm
0.642.54
fuel
100-h
DBH
00.64 cm
fuel
of
definition
Stand
of
the
to
response
thinning
the
for
in
year
SDI
2020
year
maximum
index
density
maximum
Average
for
the
for
the
and
then
the remaining
for
THNBRNI
2000 and
scenario
thereafter
Table
Area
wood
total
treated
volume
harvested
Variable
area underburned
and
ha
thinned
Area
ha
underburned
Volume
m3
removed
stand
2760
THN
8090
THNBRN1
8090
THNBRN
8090
THNBRNI
7963
THNBRN
7963
THNP
Stand
basal area
70-year
and
basal area
is
for
postthin
simulation
burning
m2/ha
NOTRT
period
no
the
for
scenarios
management
simulated
for
278640
1099203
THNBRNI
1099203
THNBRN
1099203
2020
878
2040
2030
2050
1963
1096
1301
2036
11723
167
5380
3699
4064
5354
32938
471
1911
1326
9842
11154
681
254
11794
121
11968
12038
8090
116
34
12418
177
7963
114
12072
76831
47677
77879
182188
63025
113998
179106
274646
469982
264475
317674
407750
2948037
1099203
15703
112810
64476
35252
17377
9378
2340
1340837
19155
34.9
36.5
37.8
38.8
39.4
31.5
32.1
33.5
33.8
33.6
21.1
22.7
22.3
23.5
23.7
23.1
23.6
27.8
31.2
33.9
35.8
THN
17.7
THNBRNI
17.7
19.0
THNBRN
17.7
17.4
Table
on1y
shows
on
private
1098
114307
30.3
thin
per year
Total
1689
27.2
scenarios
area
study
4386
31.5
Tl-INP
Emily
1963
THNP
treatment
Mount
2060
NOTRT
20002070
the
Average
2010
THNP
THN
Average
time
Decade
Scenario
2000
Area
basal area over
average
outputs
lands
17.3
for
the
THN
decade
17.4
label
repeated
17.7
following
thinning
the
specified
thin
year
and
13464
42115
39.8
9.1
18.3
THNBRN
942513
Average
burn
once
per year
is
THNBRN
calculated
repeated
by
using
thinning
treatment
00025
A.A Ager
296
et
al
and Urban
/Landscape
time
through
stem
2007
80
Planning
292300
60%
About
Fig
SE
exclusion
class
for
of the landscape
NOTRT
the
scenario
in
was
in
year
2060
the
0.7
treatment
06
than
scenarios created
NOTRT
the
6iRT
Average
scenarios
thin
on
only
Mount
for the
THNmN1.....iHNBi
and
thin
stand density
Emily
THN
lands
private
bum once THNBRN
and
maximum
of
proportion
simuated
study
index
SD
on
over time
relative
increased
2030 compared
THN
THN
repeated
no
for the
maximum
of the
by
and 45%
management
over
the
stand
m2/ha
area
for
The
Table
increased
basal
the
lower
than
Stand
THN
scenarios
Fig
Fig
for
The
NOTRT
by
and
After the
Table
rapid
in
stand
the
scenarios
scenario
old
forest
time
over
the
in
InS
ce
mm
HZZZZ
01111
ZHHHH
old
the
OS
stratum
single
the
equaled
values
4700
hulk
densities
and
for
ha
of
the
in
year
In
but
still
2060
scenario
THN
The
YM
over
in
remained
THN
of
OOS
kg/m3
see
2000 and
hulk
by
showed
densities
crown
postthin
were clustered
spread
over
scenario
the
see
in the
0.13 kg/m3
2000
to
density
scenario
The
year
hulk
NOTRT
year
crown
had
the
majority
range
distribution
study area
had
crown
0.020.06 kg/m3
range
the simulation
scenario
in
scenario
Fig
scenario
year
large
in the
densities
2000
0.20
THNBRNI
the
NOTRT
the
area
study
THN
for the
Fig
for
and
0.09
treatment
NOTRT
the
distribution
kg/m3
for
density
thinning
from
Although
crown
about
the
instance
Fig
thinning
averaged
hulk
the
the
char
stand
hulk density
Average crown base height decreased
forest
increased
slightly
from
period
crown
3.7
base
for the
to
height
2.7
by
NOTRT
Fig
1.7
on
OM
aa
mm tra mm
ml o. ma
Hzzzz HZZZZ
HZZZZ
HZZZZ
01111 01111 Oiiii Oiiia
ZHIHH ZH---- ZHH-- Z--H
tXcl
JI
120CC
and
0.060.08 kg/rn3
values
hulk
OUR
fir
species
on
For
decreasing
between
crown
was narrower and
structure
yj
The
effect
treatment
thinning
showed
Fig
2040 Area
0.20
stand
uSE
40%
composition
other
behavior
crown
average
difference
after
above
of
thinning
of
loss
to
of grand
species
for
marked
wildfire
first
increased
around
all
was
structure
initial
increase
for
the
persisted
over
that
scenarios
the
initiation
gradual
slight
nearly
year
reduced
scenario
the
decades
nario
treat-
first
from 19
percentage
Tree
constant
had
treatments
after
time
later
was consistently
among
after
showed
and
and
changes
differences
large
structure
OM
multistratum
time
treatment
the
SI
initiation
after
the
THNBRN scenario
about 46 m2/ha
increase
large
observed
reduced
substantially
for
for the
showed
structure
thinning
m2/ha
1.5
over
slightly
the
was
area
NOTRT scenario to
the
THN THNBRN and THNBRNI scenarios
difference
between the NOTRT and THN basal
from
basal area
ment
scenario
NOTRT
the
year
for
20%
to
nearly
determine
that
kg/rn3
narios
thinning
first
17.7
70%
about
equal
87%
scenario
Average
the
to
to
was
basis
The thinning
acteristics
0.09
rapidly
Conversely
from 39
the
basal area
the
period
scenario increased
scenarios
for
NOTRT no treatment
THNBRNI
thin
thinning
area
repeated
pine
basal area
total
simulation
the
THN
in the
basal area decreased
________________
---- THN
-THNP
of the
2030204020502060
20102020
___________
THNP
OM OS
structure
Fig
Over
Fig
composition
of ponderosa
five
forest
Thethinningtreatmentsresultedinmodestchangesinspecies
04
Fig
more old
scenario
na
cY
ml ma mm ta mcn
HZZzz ZZZZ
zzzz
Zr-H
lLLI
Z-
UHU
1001
80C
2CC
2000
2q00
PreThin
Post
720
2010
ThIn
Year
Fig
Area
Crookston
no
in
and
treatment
different
Stage
THNP
forest
1999
thin
structure
OM
only
on
old
classes
forest
private
by
decade
multistrata
lands
THN
OS
for
old
repeated
five
management
forest
single
thinning
scenarios
story
SI
THNBRNI
simulated
stand
thin
for
initialitation
and
burn
once
the
SE
Mount
Emily
stem
exclusion
THNBRN
thin
study
and
UR
area
Structure
understory
modeling
reinitiation
follows
NOTRT
repeated
00026
A.A Ager
et
al
and Urban
Landscape
aPP aDF aWL aGF ULP
Ot
zi-t--i-
aa
I-
00
tZZZZ
01111
-zzzz
Zi--I--
Zi-i--i-i-
-I--i-
297
DES DAF
ft
OQ
Oirri -zzzz
01111
-zzzz
Oiiii IZzzz
01111
i-zzzz
100%
as
IQ
1X0
292300
2007
80
Planning
Z---
li-i-I--i-
QO am
ZZZZ
Oiiii ZZZZ
01111
Qo
cna
Zi-i.-
Z.-i----I--
J1J
2000
Pie
2000
Thin
Post
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2060
Thin
Year
Fig
Average
lands
TI-IN
of basal
percentage
WL
Douglas-fir
western
repeated
GF
larch
area by
grand
THNBRN1
thinning
species
LP
fir
and
thin
over
time
for
lodgepole
burn
five
pine
once
management
ES Engelmann
THNBRN
thin
and
scenarios
simulated
AF
spruce
for
subalpine
the
Mount
Emily
fir
NOTRT
no
study
area
treatment
PP
ponderosa
THNP
DF
pine
only
thin
on
private
repeated
025
12
015
------
005
_____________
2000
2010
2020
2030
2040
2050
2010
2000
2060
2020
2030
NOTRTFig
only
on
for
the
private
THNBRN
thin
bulk
Mount
density
Emily
lands
THN
and
repeated
study
repeated
over
time
2050
2060
EOTRT_THNPTHN_THNi..ThNBRN
THNP--THN----THNBRN1-TH
crown
Average
simulated
2040
Year
Year
for
five
management
scenarios
Fig
NOTRT no treatment THNP thin
THNBRNI thin and burn once
thinning
the
area
lands
and
crown
Average
Mount
Emily
THN
base
repeated
height
over
time
for
five
management
scenarios
in
NOTRT no treatment THNP thin only on private
THNBRN1 thin and burn once THNBRN thin
thinning
study
area
repeated
7000
6000
3000
2000
1000
Crown
2000-NOTRT
Fig
year
Distribution
2000
are
of crown
bulk
density
values
for
the
no
treatment
bulk
density
2060-NOTRT
2000-THN
NOTRT
and
kg/rn3
thin
repeatedly
THN
2060-THN
scenarios
in
years
2000
and
2060
Values
for
the
THN
in
postthinning
00027
298
eta /Landscape
A.A Ager
THNBRN
The
nario
the simulation
over
average
crown
base
showed
an
to
response
the
crown
than
in
scenario
NOTRT
the
height
in
2020
year
140
..
in
scenario
2010
year
and rapidly decreased
1.6
in
80
there
Interestingly
601
THNBRNI
the
in
292300
802007
Planning
see
increases
2010 The THNBRN1
of
for
height
to
dramatic
in
crown base
treatment
minimum
base
NOTRT
the
year
thinning
after reaching
the
after
increase
height
initial
relative
period
scenario resulted
and Urban
scenario
was
lower
2020
after
20
2000
3.2
Potentialfire
2010
2020
HNP
NOTR
For
height
ued
THN
the
volume
and
then
Potential
scenario
after
mortality
the
increased
steadily
tree
the
in
from
time
in
for
that
will
THNRRN
ning
crown
active
THNP
treatment
and
thin
over
time
burn
only
given
on
sustain
for
constant
Fig
were
initial
between
11
THN
treatments
and
in
windspeed
weather
THN
and
conditions
thin
repeated
repeated
poten-
2000
4000
year
3000
at
the
NOTRT
index
2000 most
year
40km/h
The
higher
steadily
for
crowning
of
the
area
had
thinning
for
primarily
that
versus
the
after
until
for
treatment
that
the
initial
an
initial
year 2040
Fig 10
Area
and
repeatedly
thin
NOTRT
the
the
index
crowning
scenarios
in
for
2000
years
for
40km/h
the
scenario
indices
in
year
was highly
values
exceeded
the
most
70
area
much
in
60
and
representative
is
30
ing Blue
20
show
the
20502060
iF6T-THNP----THNTHNBRN1
to
long
Average
in
every
Weather
Wildfire
FVS
thinning
was
of
percentage
stand
for
conditions
wood
volume consumed
management
five
for
the
wildfire
agement
scenarios
simulation
in
the
are
by
simulated
Mount
Emily
described
in
the
at
the
stand
scale
with
the
Fire
NOTRT no treatment THNP thin only on private
THNBRNI thin and burn once THNBRN thin
and
Fuels
arca
wildstudy
text
our
TI-IN
and
repeated
index
values
networks
management
lynx
benchmarks
the
repeated
density
goals on
stand-level
potential
habitat
for
simulations
the
infeasible
entire
crown
tire
analysis
and
1992
trcatmcnt
over
density
man
area
Emily
national
on
implement
concerns
simulations
including
and
serve
finan
as
useful
planning
strategic
indicated
al
of east
surround
the
constraints
visual
the
Mount
of
Mount
to
et
Mountains
long-term
resource
Nevertheless
Cochran
repcated
the
show
results
al 2001 Wickman
like
condi
forest
more detailed
maintain
and
scenarios
Blue
assessments
rcquircs
and
landscapes
considerations
cial
et
of
desired
provide
Quigley
achieve
on
the
broad-scale
Extension
lands
area had
sample
in the
density
simulations
to
goals
make
Overall
simulated
stand
previous
term
between
gap
significant
old-growth
Fig
the
Mountains
that
forests
THNBRN
-- __
----------
crowning
and thus the
Mountains
wide array of operational
Year
------
of
The
Oregon
em
Blue
the
current
compared
10
of
magnitude
1994
2040
of
the
Discussion
the
2030
ot
km/h
100
Our study
2020
NOTRT
treatment
2060
to
less
tions
2010
no
the
and
distribution
and
asymmetrical
in
that
2060
100-
2000
km/hr
NORTa206J
2060
thin
distribution
crowning
THN
2000 THN
where
between 10 and
index
of
distribution
Class
Index
Crowning
NOTRI
2000
than
shifted
had
in
distributions
the
crowning
areas
crowning
was
Area
Fig
values
time
index
resulted
index
thereafter
seenar
over
THNBRN
the
-i
___._
44km/h
THNBRN
increased
the
1000
was
2001
around
at
and
scenario
Fig 10 showed
initial
values
and
higher
the
in
scenario
to
required
Reinhardt
THN
year 2000
in
and decreased
treatment
crowning
area
thin
the
is
7000
year
windspeed
the
THNBRNI
km/h
increase of 24
equaled
km/h
23
The
scenario
ning
higher
substantially
After the
for
the
and
Scott
NOTRT
the
index
Crowning
estimates
hre
crown
active
an
relatively
fire
of
set
lands
private
THNBRN
once
index
sim
scenarios
management
five
crowning
under
fire
thin
for
The
area
study
2000
index which
Crowning
it
no
Emily
an
sustain
NOTRT
index
crowning
Mount
the
wildfire
63%
reach
to
THNBTFFJ
ThN
2060 Fig
year
thinning
ulated
2060
ios
2060
through
decrease
rapid
volume
total
declined
steadily
initial
over
of
mortality
in
base
crown
mortality contin-
tree
91%
scenarios
resulted
and
density
16% respectively
34 and
THNBRN1
were consistent with
potential
time reaching
THNBRN
time and equaled
tial
scenario
Fig
and
2050
mortality revealed
tree
that
bulk
crown
in
NOTRT
by year 2060
scenarios
the
among
increase through
to
The
potential
changes
the
fire-caused
Average
differences
the observed
for
of
2040
Year
analysis
The simulation
large
2030
that
thinning
Emily landscape
behavior
and
to
meet stand
would
associated
reduce
mortal
00028
A.A Ager
increase the area of
ity
and
extent
some
to
earlier
seral
like
species
of thinning
effect
old
of
2001 Van Wagner
1977
the
tive
cited
crown
average
which
0.06kg/rn3
that
as
the
carried
years
the
scenario
Thus
ning
conditions
as
compared
because
ues
Barbour
long
not
all
we
because
of
fuels
is
treatments
the
in
over
difficult
THNBRNI
the
the
THNBRN
the
of old
large percentage
have
ment The
structure
adjacent
to
net
val-
and
land
of
forest
background
natural
structure
after
et
fire
al
et
can
increased
the
with
Mitchell
Many
such
Finney 2004
bances
et
Ager
al 2003
resources
the
and
needed
to
be
al
et
versus
in the
the
NOTRT
of
the
710%
The magnitude
we
et
al
simulanatural
active
fuel
scenario
and
inten-
projected
scenario
and
and
of
Blue Mountains
to
and elsewhere
in
need
harvesting
contribute
achieve
be
will
treatments
explicit
issues
how
that
to
long-
management
the intermountain
We
this
are
Tom Burry
Crookston Rob Seli and
Nick
including
mous reviewers
We
number of people
to
grateful
study
Linda Dillavou
thank
tance
This
Program
Mountains
Program
useful
provided
of
work
was
the
Pacific
to
who
Two
Wallace
Patricia
comments
Gary
help with
provided
Crippen Bob Clements
Popek
to
an
for
Program
and
anony
version
earlier
assis
editorial
by the Focused Science
Northwest Research
Demonstration
grant
and
funded
Willie
Station
Delivery
the
Blue
Joint Fire Science
Ager
the
References
predicted
more
study
Ager
of the observed
spatially
All of these
questions
reduction
active
of the respective
that
fuel
reflects
rate
Acknowledgements
the
present study
levels
comparison
the
that
costs
design
finance
to
treatment
Finney 2004
behavior
of investments
the kinds
other
Future analyses
how
examine
wildfire
Wallin
on
Johnson
productivity
al 2000
et
should
about
treatments
fuel
forest
other distur
al 2001
et
in
in
Hemstrom
and
in
and
affect
way
of
system
coarsely
background
scenarios
showed
rates
200-year
active-fuel-treatment
between our
West
2007
al
The
with
about
goals
agents
trees
treatments
fuel
and
wildfire
Quigley
effects
WUI
long term
in
manageliterature
as
simulation
of
pattern
volume
Tiedemann
questions
in the
is
and
fire-damaged
the
with
spatial
wildlife
Emily
addressed
to
concern
ponderosae
in
beetles
lead
density
Of
underburning
between
this
arrangement
spatial
stand
volume
this
At the
may
pine
fir
grand
brevicomis under
explored
optimal
including
Economic
al
et
as
insects
when
even
frequent
and secondary
Mount
other
disturbance
such
Dendroctonus
interactions
et
behavior
examine
to
major
ponderosa
by these
be
as
fire
1980
can
issues
used
Ager
activity
and Martin
needs
are
beetles
Dendroctonus
increased
suggests
sce
the treatment
from these
like
species
includes
that
may
adjacent
Torgersen 2001 and the thinning
mountain
pine beetle
ment regime
we
for
of
potential
overall
the impact
thinning
impacts
that
on
alternatives
from bark
impacts
controlled
are
reduce
selection
when
risk
removed host species
simulated
likely
same time
simula-
develop-
be
al scenarios fire suppression
disturbance
60 years
forest
suppression
were made
20%
the
growth
study
three scenarios
structure
two other Hemstrom
areas
model
However
treatments
this
watershed
treatment
assumptions
fuel
forest
in
insects wildfire
to the
tree
by Hemstrom
reported
The Hemstrom
area of old
old
would
and
land
private
indicated
defoliators
Blue Mountains
we
treatments
the
Insect
agents
in the
agent
used
effect
of
assessment
term landscape
generated
and disease
of old
rates
projections
Grande Ronde
comparable
different
sity
robust
on
struc
forest
behavior
wildfire
between
created
is
Forest
on
not treated
is
on
values
end of
the
at
insect
optimistic
unrealistic
and considered
period
treatments
as
to
scenarios
structure
endemic
of
state-and-transition
disturbances
not
led
those
Upper
study used
is
forest
and perhaps
our simulations
compared
THNBRN1
and
The omission
Fig
FVS may
tion
land
moderating
disturbance
fire
potential
of reducing
terms
in
Although the models
had
contrast
exten
of
treatments
composition Treatments
effective
Forest Service
the implications
without
sharp
in
ownerships
species
run The
managed
Federally
time
and Miyanishi 1995
negative
of resource
variety
result
Over
and transportation
Both
in
less
land
private
behavior
Mountains
Blue
in the
thin-
may
fire
the long
have
generally
on
However
treatments
of
similar
base
tion
be
Crown-
after
terms
in
scenario
i.e
less
or
regeneration
later
2040
values
to
years
desirable
showed
examined
back
were
burning
time
long
without
less
al 2007 and
et
the
as
addition
simulation
the
decreased
seedling
once
are
of
40
within
must be considered
constraints
as
and
thinning
reverted
actually
of
fuel
In
mor-
crown base
higher
variables
the
no-treatment
to
The
seedling
treatments
for
of
all
height
result
many
where
variables
management
long-term
and
western
persist
scenario
that
in
threshold
the beginning
at
thinning
in
from wildfire
composition
scenario
thinning
base
land
different
ture
THN-
and
efficiency
other
canopy
average
the
scenario
once
and
THN
in significant
THN
thinning
effects
NOTRT
the
commonly
and
modeling approaches
different
demonstrated
also
on
treatment
Service
Keyes and
fires
mortality
species
resulting
the
in
in
most but not
index
to
the
thinning
tree
resulted
persisted
out only
for
The simulations
the
was
scenario
threshold
crown
between the
density
scenario
were removed
treatment
that
are
alterna-
measured variables crown
potential
burns
THNBRN1
The
THN
the
kg/m3
active
the
bulk
THNBRN
90%
used
of
index
was below
seedlings
the 0.10
which
of
THN
the
for
for
density
differences
crown
Seedlings
SDI
both
the
considering
large
299
study areas
sive
parameters
Scott and Reinhardt
activity
instance
sustain
some
maintenance
height
stand
to
large
for
crowning
in
tality
bulk
on
not
is
The
larch
western
effects
the
to
292300
2007
80
Planning
narios
but not others
decadal
fire
For
below
is
required
OHara 2002
We observed
BRN scenarios
height
crown
marked
crown height
live
structure
composition
pine and
had
and Urban
Landscape
single-story
species
ponderosa
treatments
strong determinants
ing
forest
crown bulk density and
like
with
forests
change
al
et
difference
A.A
restoration
Hayes
strategies
McMahan
on bark
Smith
beetle
EL
mortality
Simulating
Landscape
the
effect
Urban
of
forest
Plann
this
volume
00029
A.A Ager
300
F.A 1976
Albini
INT-30
U.S
Research
Andrews
of
92
Ogden
1986
systemBURN
and Urban
Landscape
Gen Tech
effects
Service
Rep
National
Johnson
behavior
and
prediction
Gen Tech
fuel
Rep INT-194
13.5
Depart-
in
UTl3opp
35
R.J
Urban
Plann
Bradshaw
Forest
1994
OR
21
Station
N.L
Crookston
of
the
from
U.S
Research
ulator
the
2003
M.A
In
Hayes
D.C
Powell
Research
of
Station
Portland
UT
OR
Rep INT-281 U.S
OHara
Forest
and
Range
Experiment
stand
Gen Tech
simulator
Forest
Service
Forest
the
of Agriculture
CO
simulation
Eds
and
193
Forest
for
Rep PNW-GTR-6I0
Northwest
Pacific
optimization
integrated
U.S
Forest and
Service
and
Treatments
Gen Tech
Rocky
Restoration
Ecological
Rep RMRS-P-29
Mountain
U.S
Grand
forests
western
Research
Station
Photo
F.C 1998
western
53
Rep INT-96 U.S
Forest
and
of
codes
for
Rep PNW-GTR-418
Northwest
Pacific
and
seral
U.S
Research
Station
pp
M.A
landscape
80
rial
U.S
Subbasin
2007
and
state
Integrated
USA
Oregon
analysis
models
transition
in
Urban
Landscape
From
R-6
Stand
Department
C.G
T.A
the
1992
Handbook
Examination
of Agriculture
Clausnitzer
Mountains
Tech
R.R
PubI
Planar
for
Program
Forest
1992
Intercept
Inventorying
Fuel
Downed
Plant
Portland
Mate-
U.S
of
Wales
in
the
Blue
and
of
G.E
clas
11.97102
on
burning
2001
crown
IIl
II
Fire
forest
Improving
Northwest
Washington
CO
Sci
Res
behavior
in
The
Fire
forests
even-aged
and
Extension
Fuels
to
the
RMRS-GTR- 116 U.S Depart
Mountain
Rocky
2004
Research
The
Station
crown
behavior
2001
Forest
Service
of
interaction
54
fire
Assessing
of
measure
site
INT-77
Note
Research
of the
Fort
fuels
fire
1675
66
by
potential
Res
linking
RMRS-RP-29
Pap
Mountain
Rocky
utilization
U.S
of
Nevada
for
Research
of
Moscow ID
and
silviculture
mixed
fir
grand
Department
Station
effects
Sierra
JO Bull FL
fire
related
Agriculture
Il
pp
treatment
fuels
Ecol
conifer forests For
forest
are
2000
Solution
and
productivity
of
health
forest
wildlife
at
risk
118
127
2001
Defoliators
in
and
eastern Oregon
Northwest
Washington
1977
Conditions
for
Ihe
start
and
of wildfire
spread
Can
2334
L.H
.Suring
wildlife
tree
on
1992
pine
Forest
tare Forest Service
16
Urban
fire
Plann
K.R.
Wagner
resistance
to
health
in the
Gen Tech Rep PNW
OR
Assessment
with
hark
of long-term
and
fuel
beetles
in
volume
this
MR.
trends
management
2003
in
of crown
Effects
northern
Arizona
32 652661
Entomol
disease
associated
Landscape
T.E Skov
ponderosa
M.A
Hemstrom
habitat
USA
Oregon
K.F Kolh
Portland
for
pp
tree
by
prescribed
CE
B.C
large
Environ
59
Evaluation
Manage
Res
scorch
index
forests BioScience
fire
Klemmedson
with
northeast
and
Department
191
1120
75
Wickman
vol
OR
Associations
R6-ERW-TP-036-92
Woody
Guide
Field Procedures
Service
Field
Inventory
by
Manage
2135
AR
T.R.
2001
crown
Intermountain
1998
105
Wagner
WaIlin
Adapted
Jr
River
Wales
using
198211
Wordell
and
Ochoco
Ronde
M.W
Hilbruner
Guide
Reger
scenarios
Grande
upper
Plann
Merzenich
management
infestation
structural
prescribed
and
W.H.
of Agriculture
fire
Ecol
Sci
Van
ED
and
Collins
Service
S.L.
potential
For
Hemstrom
Mountain
tree
Torgersen
OR
Portland
Romme
index
Tiedemann
of Agri-
Department
T.T
Rocky
Fort
problems
natural
potential
Forest
182190
pp
For
AppI
.3
Wildland
density
Service
Veblen
1968
For
ecoclass
and
Oregon
2003
across
Department
Manage
Experiment
West
Gen Tech Rep
Forest
density
on
and
Department
Range
Pacific
pp
Reinhardt
Forest
Montana
redcedar
209
AR.
to
Missoula
in
hemlockwestern
Intermountain
Northwest
Service
fuels
Ecol
B.C. 1996
Smith
stand
N.L.
stand
Stage
pp
Gen Tech
Forest
Gen Tech
types
Service
UT
Pacific
communities
culture
cover
Forest
downed woody
forappraising
fir-larch-Douglas-fir
Ogden
Station
guide
DC
pine
For
the
and
Fire
on
ponderosa
Daterman
eastern
Simulator
of surface
Stephens
redcedar
Agriculture
J.H.
Station
of
Department
353366
1981
CO
models
man-
fuel
Starr
in
Crookston
Vegetation
climate
Scott
Experiment
of
evaluation
of
culture
pine
Range
forests Int
Perfecting
of Agriculture
U.S
and
Expectation
Fuel
Fire
Proceedings
FischerW.C
and
pp 117131
2002
of
of thinning
pine
J.L
1933
Schoennagel
of
in
46.627638
F.
ment
modeling
Department
Range
Annual
Photogrammetry
Washington
Front
vegetation
Effect
ponderosa
Hayes
Res
Forest
Forest
forest
productivity
L.H
Collins
treatment
fuel
Methods
of
stand
the
130
Agric
pp
in
and
Reineke
Sim-
Service
silvicultural
using
Conference
Probability
PA. Hessburg
2002
P.N.
T.M
75
Mountain
Vegetation
29
ACSMASPRS
Society
Foresters
Colorado
the
Northwest
for
severity
Quigley
RMRS-
Rep
2004
in
beetle
for
thin
1109
dynamics
insects
Sixth
the
Fire
248257
pp
and
Fire
of
of American
J.B
Popp
Omi
fire
structure
Rocky
1980
R.E
Society
pine
Reinhardt
to
guide
Fort Collins
fire
and
cover
canopy
American
MD
Proceedings
K.L. Latham
Pollet
of
Department
vol
through
targets
10
1997
the
hazard
1727
Rep
Intermountain
pp
Department
iD
Forest
Service
guidetotheparallelprocessingexten-
users
Gen Tech
objectives
Agriculture
II
FVS
Service
Cohen
Conference
pp
J.F
Negron
sification
Percent
Barbour
change
Portland
agement
1999
Landscape
Forest
MA
the
Meteorology
pp
Gen Tech
Center
Ager
Gen Tech
monitor
Forest
of Agriculture
Ogden
2004
21
vegetation
Rep U.S
Agriculture
Station
In
stand
of
Bethesda
Martin
Northwest
stand
forest
behavior
fire
Wildland
fire
AppI For 17
Proceedings
Exposition
in
tnt
Quantifying
of
3271278
interface
Visualizing
In
Sensing
R.G.
Mitchell
Oregon
Department
and
Remote
and
1997
system
Convention
pp
health
forest
Service
of landscape
Johnson
123
northeastern
13 U.S
event
the
Intermountain
AR
Essential
Internal
Management
Finney
R.J
visualization
pp
Department
Station
G.E
87
to
Agriculture
1991 Users
Service
UT
Stage
GTR-24
UT
model
Forest
statistics
of
R.R
of
PNW-RN-5
Northwest
guide
of
A.R
Stage
N.L
Crookston
Users
Ogden
Ogden
Station
290
stands
2.0
Agriculture
UT
Ogden
Clausnitzer
forest
Note
Pacific
Department
prognosis
Agriculture
Hall
D.L
for
Res
Service
1990
N.L
Research
MT
levels
of
Department
Station
version
guide
consideration
for
Ecol
Reductions
urban
West
fires
need
Restor
1998
the
K.L. 2002
of crown
prevention
The
burning
in
disposal
C.R OHara
Keyes
mountain
U.S
Finney
Clemens
Washington
INT-275
Dixon
product
Landscape
pp
Crookston
sion
J.M
Forest
U.S
Research
stocking
Geist
Suggested
Agriculture
treatments
plus users
FireFamily
Mountain
Rocky
southeastern
forest
Evaluating
McGaughey
2000
Rep RMRS-GTR-67WWW
Service
PH
Cochran
2007
restoration
ecological
237248
80
McCormick
Gen Tech
and
of planning
part
D.A
Maguire
Singleton
as
pp
164
1995
prescribed
Region Wallowa-Whitman
Northwest
Pacific
City
K.l Omi P.N
Kalabodkidis
ning/residue
potential
Baker
Miyanishi
effects
mentofAgricultureForestService.lntermountainResearchStationOgdcn
Barbour
Service
Forest
Forest
E.A
and
modeling
292300
2007
80
Planning
Agriculture
Intermountain
pp
fire
Part
subsystem
and
Forest
Agriculture
UT
BEHAVE
Station
P.L
behavior
wildfire
Estimating
Department
al
et
Pacific
Blue
Mountains
GTR-6l0
Northwest
U.S
Forest and
the
influence
Department
Range
of
insects
of Agricul
Experiment
Station
pp
00030