BEST VALUE BID #BVB0002-15
(2) Refurbished/New Ultrasound Machine for Medical Imaging Student Classroom
Vendor Ranking Form
Criteria For Ranking
Points
Vendor
No. 1
Vendor
No. 2
Vendor No.
3
Vendor
No. 4
1) Financial – Sixty percent of the total evaluation shall be based on points assigned
according to the methodology described under CALCULATING THE LOW BID clause
above.
1-60
59
N/A
60
60
2) Technology and Innovation being offered with equipment –
Twenty percent of the total evaluation score shall be based on the panel’s review of
the Ultrasound machine being offered as it relates to the various applications, design
features, advanced performance options and ease of use
1-20
20
N/A
18
20
3) Equipment – Twenty percent of the total evaluation score shall be based on the
panel’s review of the age, performance history and overall condition of equipment to
insure that the general quality and condition will meet the Colleges’ expectations while
performing in a training classroom environment.
1-20
10
N/A
18
18
100
89
N/A
96
98
TOTAL
Vendor 1: National Ultrasound Inc.
Name: Dianna Cecala, Procurement Manager
Vendor 2: Advanced Ultrasound Electronics – Determined to be Non-Responsive
Date: August 12, 2015
Vendor 3: GE Healthcare
Vendor 4: Toshiba