STRATEGICPLAN
PROGRESSREPORT
Presentation to
LACCD Board of Trustees
Institutional Effectiveness Committee
June 26, 2013
Nabil Abu‐Ghazaleh, President
2
GOAL 1: ACCESS AND PREPARATION FOR SUCCESS
Objective 1: Ensure equitable access to education

West
District
0%
Baseline
Comparison
20%
40%
60%

80%
100%
3-Year Change
Comparison
0%
20%
40%
60%
Performance Measures
Est. % of eligible students
receiving any Financial
Aid
Est. % of eligible students
receiving Pell Grant
94%
89%
47%
51%
7%
9%
11%
15%
3
detail
GOAL 1: ACCESS AND PREPARATION FOR SUCCESS
Goal 1, Objective 1.2: Percentage of eligible students receiving financial aid
OVERALL
Harbor
Mission
8,697
11,016
12,764
3,122
4,000
4,327
2,604
3,663
4,073
2009-10
2010-11
2011-12
5,625
6,609
7,754
5,273
7,054
8,392
SL
Pell Grant (comes with BOGG)
Pierce
Southwest
E
East
TradeTech
Valley
3,910
5,594
6,257
4,921
6,779
7,478
3,314
4,111
4,121
40,796
52,460
58,546
ID
City
Cohort
3,330
3,634
3,380
All
West Colleges
EN
Total Students Receiving Any Financial Aid [Pell Grant (comes with BOGG) or BOGG Only]
11,516
20,409
5,284
5,740
10,011
6,503
11,639
11,579
8,018
90,699
2010-11
12,258
21,926
6,107
6,477
11,269
6,303
12,799
12,774
8,291
98,204
2011-12
13,023
23,406
6,651
6,686
12,519
5,727
12,602
13,242
8,160
102,016
ID
D
2009-10
Est. % of eligible students receiving Pell Grant (comes with BOGG)
37%
37%
45%
34%
43%
49%
25%
35%
36%
36%
2010-11
42%
46%
55%
46%
58%
55%
34%
48%
46%
46%
2011-12
47%
51%
60%
51%
61%
57%
41%
52%
47%
51%
H
2009-10
Est. % of eligible students receiving any Financial Aid [Pell Grant (comes with BOGG) or
BOGG Only]
2009-10
76%
86%
76%
75%
81%
95%
73%
82%
87%
81%
2010-11
78%
91%
84%
81%
92%
96%
79%
90%
92%
86%
2011-12
79%
94%
93%
84%
91%
97%
83%
92%
94%
89%
Est.% Eligible
4
(determined from Fall 2009 and Spring 2012 Student Surveys)
2009
71%
73%
56%
60%
49%
76%
78%
59%
58%
65%
2012
73%
74%
57%
65%
57%
74%
78%
64%
61%
67%
return
GOAL 1: ACCESS AND PREPARATION FOR SUCCESS
Objective 2: Increase the % of new students who complete the
matriculation process by the end of their first semester
 Baseline
 3-Year Change
Comparison
Comparison
Performance Measures
West
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
‐10%
10%
30%
50%
70%
District
% of new students
completing assessment‐
English
% of new students
completing assessment‐
Math
2%
63%
64%
55%
62%
‐1%
‐6%
‐5%
5
Detail
GOAL 1: ACCESS AND PREPARATION FOR SUCCESS
Pierce
64.7%
69.4%
73.9%
Southwest
77.2%
76.4%
78.2%
TradeTech
51.4%
37.4%
28.8%
Southwest
76.6%
76.0%
77.4%
TradeTech
54.5%
38.0%
31.4%
SL
East Harbor Mission
61.2% 74.5% 73.7%
63.9% 74.3% 72.5%
61.9% 71.4% 76.0%
Valley
73.4%
70.7%
72.7%
All
West Colleges
60.8%
64.8%
61.0%
64.7%
62.7%
63.6%
Valley
73.1%
72.6%
71.6%
All
Colleges
67.7%
64.0%
62.3%
D
2009
2010
2011
City
59.4%
63.1%
58.1%
EN
Cohort
ID
Percentage of new students completing assessment in English E
Goal 1, Objective 2.1: Percentage of new students completing assessment in English and Math (in the fall term or three years prior)
2009
2010
2011
City
60.1%
64.1%
60.2%
East Harbor Mission
81.5% 71.7% 51.8%
84.1% 71.7% 39.4%
79.5% 69.2% 38.4%
H
Cohort
ID
Percentage of new students completing assessment in Math
Pierce
65.4%
59.4%
62.9%
West
60.8%
57.2%
55.1%
6
return
GOAL 1: ACCESS AND PREPARATION FOR SUCCESS
Objective 3: Increase the % of new students successfully
completing at least one English and Math class in the first year

West
District
Baseline
Comparison

0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90%100%
‐10%
3-Year Change
Comparison
10%
30%
50%
70%
Performance Measures
% of new students successfully
completing at least one
English and Math
Fall to Spring Persistence
Fall to Fall Persistence
2%
17%
‐2%
16%
83%
87%
68%
75%
1%
2%
3%
3%
7
Detail
GOAL 1: ACCESS AND PREPARATION FOR SUCCESS
Goal 1, Objective 3.1: Percentage of new students successfully completing at least one English and Math class in their first year
EN
SL
ID
E
Percentage of new students successfully completing at least one English and Math class in their first year
South- TradeAll
Cohort
City
East Harbor Mission Pierce
west
Tech Valley
West Colleges
8.2% 20.8% 15.5%
18.1%
2009 14.8% 21.6% 21.4% 17.9% 22.2% 13.1%
9.8% 20.8% 14.6%
19.4%
2010 14.9% 23.1% 16.3% 19.5% 27.3% 13.5%
7.2% 19.9% 17.1%
16.1%
2011 14.7% 15.8% 12.6% 15.1% 23.0% 10.4%
Column1
Fall09‐Spring10
Fall10‐Spring11
Fall11‐Spring12
City
84.4
86.2
86.9
East Harbor Mission
88.3
88.1
83.8
91.1
88.2
83.3
91.0
89.0
83.8
South- TradeAll
Pierce
west Tech Valley West Colleges
86.6
80.5
80.8
84.8
82.7
85.4
88.3
79.1
79.4
85.0
81.2
86.2
90.2
83.2
79.2
85.6
83.3
87.2
East Harbor Mission
77.4
73.7
73.2
80.8
75.4
70.5
80.0
74.6
74.6
South- TradeAll
Pierce
west Tech Valley West Colleges
75.8
61.3
60.6
73.6
65.0
72.1
77.9
55.5
64.5
76.1
63.2
73.6
79.1
68.8
65.3
75.8
68.4
75.2
H
Fall to Spring Persistence
ID
D
Goal 1, Objective 3.2: Persistence (Fall to Spring and Fall to Fall) Fall to Fall Persistence
8
Column1
Fall09‐Fall10
Fall10‐Fall11
Fall11‐Fall12
City
68.1
70.0
72.3
return
GOAL 2: TEACHING & LEARNING FOR SUCCESS
Objective 1: Provide a learner-centered learning environment that
encourages active learning and student engagement

Baseline Comparison
0.0% 10.0% 20.0% 30.0% 40.0% 50.0% 60.0% 70.0% 80.0% 90.0% 100.0%
West
District
60.3%
63.1%
Active learning/project learning
Student engagement in and out of
class
Self‐efficacy/self‐directed learning
Whether/how technology is being used
to improve student learning and
engagement
9
16.2%
19.7%
64.8%
66.8%
72.3%
71.1%
GOAL 2: TEACHING & LEARNING FOR SUCCESS
Objective 2: Increase the percentage of new students who have
reached the following milestones within six years.

West
District
Baseline
Comparison
0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%
100.0%

‐10.0% 10.0% 30.0% 50.0% 70.0%
Performance Measures
% cohort completing 30
units within six years
% of cohort completing 60
units within six years
0.4%
1.5%
56.1%
65.9%
30.4%
42.1%
3-Year Change
Comparison
‐0.9%
1.1%
% of cohort completing
English 101 and Math 125
within six years
20.3%
32.9%
‐1.5%
‐1.9%
Completion Rate within six
years
28.5%
34.0%
‐2.4%
‐1.9%
10
Detail
GOAL 2: Teaching and Learning for Success
Six Year Outcomes
SL
ID
E
Goal 2, Objective 2.1: Percentage of new student cohort completing 30 units within six years
South- TradeAll
Cohort
City
East Harbor Mission Pierce west
Tech Valley West Colleges
64.4%
2004 64.3% 69.2% 61.8% 61.3% 68.4% 50.1% 58.6% 65.6% 55.7%
65.1%
2005 63.8% 69.4% 64.8% 65.0% 71.5% 42.3% 56.8% 66.6% 49.2%
65.9%
2006 63.5% 69.3% 63.9% 62.1% 72.6% 46.2% 62.6% 66.1% 56.1%
ID
D
EN
Goal 2, Objective 2.1: Percentage of new student cohort completing 60 units within six years
South- TradeAll
Cohort
City
East Harbor Mission Pierce west
Tech Valley West Colleges
41.0%
2004 41.6% 46.0% 40.3% 36.0% 44.7% 27.1% 35.9% 41.9% 31.3%
40.9%
2005 38.7% 45.5% 39.1% 37.6% 47.5% 22.1% 37.3% 41.1% 27.4%
42.1%
2006 41.7% 45.8% 38.8% 37.9% 48.4% 26.1% 38.7% 41.4% 30.4%
H
Goal 2, Objective 2.2: Percentage of new student cohort completing English 101 and Math 125 (or above) within six years
South- TradeAll
Cohort
City
East Harbor Mission Pierce west
Tech Valley West Colleges
30.6%
2004 27.6% 33.5% 24.1% 29.6% 38.9% 16.4% 15.7% 36.7% 21.8%
30.1%
2005 27.7% 31.9% 23.3% 32.5% 39.6% 10.9% 13.1% 35.6% 17.0%
32.9%
2006 29.7% 35.7% 24.2% 31.4% 44.4% 15.3% 17.8% 36.1% 20.3%
11
Goal 2, Objective 2.3: Completion Rate (i.e., certificate, degree, or transfer) within six years
South- TradeAll
Cohort
City
East Harbor Mission Pierce west
Tech Valley West Colleges
35.9%
2004 32.3% 35.5% 35.0% 30.3% 45.3% 21.0% 27.7% 39.0% 30.9%
35.1%
2005 30.4% 33.3% 33.9% 29.6% 45.9% 16.3% 29.4% 38.6% 27.6%
34.0%
2006 29.2% 33.2% 34.5% 26.3% 44.3% 18.4% 28.7% 35.2% 28.5%
return
GOAL 2: TEACHING & LEARNING FOR SUCCESS
Objective 2: Increase the percentage of new students who have
reached the following milestones within three years.

Performance Measures
12

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%
% of new student cohort
completing 30 units within
three years
% of new student cohort
completing 60 units within
three years
% of new student cohort
completing English 101 and
Math 125 (or above) within…
Completion Rate within three
years
Baseline
Comparison
3-Year Change
Comparison
‐6.0%
3.6%
1.5%
53.2%
61.0%
‐4.3%
‐0.8%
16.9%
27.8%
1.3%
14.0%
23.4%
11.8%
11.5%
West
44.0%
‐0.5%
District
‐4.1%
‐4.9%
GOAL 2: TEACHING & LEARNING FOR SUCCESS
Objective 4: Increase equity in successful outcomes by identifying
achievement gaps and increasing performance of under-performing groups.
Performance Measures
2006 Cohort
Gap in percentage of new
student cohorts completing 30
units within six years
Gap in percentage of new
student cohorts completing 60
units within six years
Gap percentage of new student
cohorts completing English 101
and Math 125 (or above)…
Gap in completion Rate (i.e.,
certificate, degree, or transfer)
13within six years

Baseline
Comparison

0.0% 10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%100.0%
West
11.5%
26.7%
District
3-Year Change
Comparison
‐20.0%
30.0%
‐10.7%
3.9%
10.9%
3.6%
29.3%
28.7%
‐14.5%
13.9%
4.8%
33.3%
22.8%
25.0%
‐2.2%
0.0%
Detail
GOAL 2: TEACHING AND LEARNING FOR SUCCESS
Six Year Outcomes ‐ 2006 Cohort
Goal 2, Objective 2.1: Percentage of new student cohort completing 30 units within six years
2006
Cohort
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
TradeTech
Valley
West
All
Colleges
74.6%
82.0%
69.7%
72.7%
81.6%
50.0%
82.8%
73.5%
64.5%
77.6%
Black
52.4%
75.0%
56.5%
35.7%
61.9%
42.5%
52.2%
51.1%
53.0%
51.0%
Hispanic
54.5%
66.9%
63.8%
62.3%
64.2%
56.6%
65.5%
62.1%
59.9%
63.3%
White
75.5%
76.2%
65.9%
55.2%
76.4%
100.0%
80.0%
72.8%
56.8%
73.6%
Total
63.5%
69.3%
63.9%
62.1%
72.6%
46.2%
62.6%
66.1%
56.1%
65.9%
SL
ID
E
Asian
Goal 2, Objective 2.1: Percentage of new student cohort completing 60 units within six years
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
EN
2006
Cohort
Southwest
TradeTech
Valley
West
All
Colleges
49.8%
63.1%
43.7%
63.6%
58.7%
50.0%
55.2%
48.3%
54.8%
55.4%
Black
29.8%
40.0%
25.9%
14.3%
34.3%
23.1%
27.9%
26.7%
25.6%
26.7%
Hispanic
32.9%
42.4%
38.9%
37.5%
40.0%
31.3%
41.8%
37.0%
33.8%
39.0%
White
55.5%
47.6%
43.5%
34.5%
51.2%
100.0%
50.0%
48.3%
29.7%
49.6%
Total
41.7%
45.8%
38.8%
37.9%
48.4%
26.1%
38.7%
41.4%
30.4%
42.1%
H
ID
D
Asian
Goal 2, Objective 2.2: Percentage of new student cohort completing English 101 and Math 125 (or above) within six years
2006
Cohort
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
TradeTech
Valley
West
All
Colleges
Asian
41.9%
53.4%
32.8%
48.5%
53.9%
16.7%
30.0%
44.2%
22.6%
Black
12.0%
13.6%
9.2%
7.1%
24.5%
13.1%
10.5%
18.9%
15.5%
47.2%
13.9%
Hispanic
23.8%
32.1%
22.4%
31.9%
38.7%
18.9%
20.6%
32.7%
29.4%
30.3%
White
35.6%
47.8%
32.6%
20.7%
47.4%
100.0%
27.3%
40.6%
16.2%
41.0%
Total
29.7%
35.7%
24.2%
31.4%
44.4%
15.3%
17.8%
36.1%
20.3%
32.9%
Goal 2, Objective 2.3: Completion Rate (i.e., certificate, degree, or transfer) within six years
2006
Cohort
14
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
TradeTech
Valley
West
All
Colleges
Asian
32.3%
56.4%
36.1%
45.5%
53.9%
50.0%
58.6%
44.9%
45.2%
47.1%
Black
23.4%
30.0%
29.6%
21.4%
33.3%
16.9%
21.7%
28.9%
22.4%
23.1%
Hispanic
23.5%
28.5%
32.3%
24.1%
30.0%
18.1%
29.6%
26.1%
27.5%
27.7%
White
37.0%
42.9%
44.9%
41.4%
55.2%
100.0%
55.0%
45.5%
43.2%
48.1%
Total
29.2%
33.2%
34.5%
26.3%
44.3%
18.4%
28.7%
35.2%
28.5%
34.0%
return
LACCD
West
1. Access and Preparation for Success: Improve equitable access; help students attain important early educational momentum points.
•Enhance, develop, and strengthen self‐service options (Student Services Plan)
•Students declare majors by end of first year at West (SSP)
2. Teaching and Learning for Success: Provide a learner‐
centered educational environment; student goal attainment; increase equity.
•Student Learning (Ed Master Plan)
•Transfer (EMP & SSP)
•Career Technical Education (EMP)
•Foundation Skills Program (EMP)
•Diversified Modes of Instructional Delivery (EMP)
15
LACCD
West
3. Organizational Effectiveness: Data‐informed planning and decision‐making, process assessment, and professional development.
• Promote fiscal transparency (Budget Committee Charge)
• Provide updated information to all constituency groups on major maintenance and construction projects (Facilities Committee Charge)
•Oversee enrollment to achieve and maintain target levels (Enrollment Management Committee)
4. Resources and Collaboration: Increase and diversify sources of revenue; enhance, strengthen and maintain partnerships.
• Encourage and facilitate a campus culture that supports resource development activities as vital to the intellectual and scholastic vitality of the college (Resource Development Committee Charge)
16
SLO Resources
17
SLO Development & Assessment
Fall 2012 ‐ Spring 2013
100%
100% 100%
97%
100% 100%
100%
100% 100%
80%
60%
Developed
43%
Assessed
40%
33%
20%
0%
Course SLOs
Target Completion
18
July 29, 2013
Program SLOs
Institutional SLOs
Student Services | Administrative Services |
Service Level Outcomes Service Level Outcomes
June 30, 2013 Institutional SLO Assessment

102 Institutional SLO Rubrics
completed by 16 faculty evaluating
Student Posters
19
Third Annual Student Poster Showcase
May 16, 2013
Next SLO Cycle
20
SLO Assessment Calendars
21
Accreditation Update
Evaluation Report on the April 2013 Follow-Up Visit:
“The College has fully addressed the recommendations, corrected the deficiencies, and is now in compliance (or ‘now is in accord’) with Accreditation Standards and Commission policies.”
and
“The District has fully addressed the recommendation, corrected the deficiencies, and now is in compliance with the Eligibility Requirements, Accreditation Standards and Commission policies.”
22
Detail
Accreditation Update
H
ID
D
EN
SL
ID
E
2012 College Accreditation Recommendations met:
 Recommendation 1: “…specify goals on all master plans and annual plans in measurable terms…”
 Recommendation 2: “develop and implement a formal, organized process that is regularly evaluated
for assuring quality of data and assessment definitions, interpretation, and application…. develop a
process where decisions are based on a culture of evidence….”
 Recommendation 3: “identify student learning outcomes that are related to course objectives for all
courses; evaluate all courses and programs through and on-going systematic review of the
relevance, appropriateness and achievement of student learning outcomes….”
 Recommendation 4: “review and revise as necessary its developed student learning and service level
outcomes to assure that they are measured in both quantitative and qualitative terms.”
 Recommendation 5: “include both an academic freedom statement, as well as a statement on the
acceptance of transfer credit in its next catalog.”
 Recommendation 6: “develop a consistent, sustainable and sufficient funding stream to develop
quantity, quality, depth and currency in Library resources and services…”
 Recommendation 7: “integrate planning, evaluation and resource allocation decision making in order
to systematically assess the effective use of its financial resources…”
2006 College Accreditation Recommendations met:
 Recommendation 6 : “periodically review staffing priorities, hours of operations, and counseling
priorities to ensure that what is delivered is consistent with program review, of acceptable quality,
and aligns with the mission and values of the college.”
 Recommendation 13: “identify ways to increase participation in governance and develop trust
throughout the institution…”
23
Return
College Plans/Outcomes and
Achieving the Dream
Intervention Strategy
Activities
Semester Kickoff
Discipline Advising
NAVIGATING WEST
ATD Scholarship Recipients
24
College Priorities
Successful achievement of degrees and certificates
(Increasing by 1.5 (low) ‐ 3 (high)% (from 40.5% to 42‐
43.5%) the number of West students obtaining
degrees and certificates)
College Plans/Outcomes and
Achieving the Dream
Activities
Intervention Strategy
College Priorities
Successful completion of the English sequence from English 21 through English 101
•
Discipline Advising Training
Faculty‐Student Dialogues
Faculty/Staff Inquiry Groups
3CSN‐Funded Activities
Faculty/Tutor Training
Communities of Practice
Five‐Day Experiential Learning Institute (FELI)
25
PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT
Increasing by 3% (low) ‐ 6% (high) (from 18% to 21%‐24%) the number of West students who, within
three years, successfully complete the English sequence from English 21 through English 101
• Successful completion of Elementary Algebra through Intermediate Algebra Increasing by 1.5% (low) ‐ 6% (high) (from 12% to 13.5%‐18%) the number of West students entering Elementary Algebra who, within 2.5 years, successfully complete Intermediate Algebra.
College Plans/Outcomes and
Achieving the Dream
Activities
Intervention Strategy
College Priorities
Successful completion of the English sequence from English 21 through English 101
•
English & math Faculty collaborate with LRC on tutor training
In‐class Tutor Coordinating and Training
Faculty/Tutor Training for In‐
class Tutor Effectiveness
ENHANCED Tutor‐Supported Study TUTORING
Groups
Develop Math Lab
26
Increasing by 3% (low) ‐ 6% (high) (from 18% to 21%‐24%) the number of West students who, within
three years, successfully complete the English sequence from English 21 through English 101
• Successful completion of Elementary Algebra through Intermediate Algebra Increasing by 1.5% (low) ‐ 6% (high) (from 12% to 13.5%‐18%) the number of West students entering Elementary Algebra who, within 2.5 years, successfully complete Intermediate Algebra.
College Plans/Outcomes and Achieving the Dream
West Goals
Achieving the Dream Priorities
Student Services Plan Goal 4:
• Successful achievement of degrees and certificates
Increasing by 1.5 (low) - 3 (high)% (from 40.5% to 42Increase the number of students
43.5%) the number of West students obtaining
who graduate with an AA/AS
degrees and certificates
degree, transfer or are prepared
to transfer.
Educational Master Plan Goal 2:
Support students in preparing
for transfer.
Educational Master Plan Goal 4:
Improve # students advancing
into transfer preparation &
Career Technology Education
programs by supporting the
college’s Foundation Skills
Program.
27
• Successful completion of the English sequence from English 21 through English 101
Increasing by 3% (low) ‐ 6% (high) (from 18% to 21%‐
24%) the number of West students who, within
three years, successfully complete the English sequence from English 21 through English 101
• Successful completion of Elementary Algebra through Intermediate Algebra Increasing by 1.5% (low) ‐ 6% (high) (from 12% to 13.5%‐
18%) the number of West students entering Elementary Algebra who, within 2.5 years, successfully complete Intermediate Algebra.

WLAC Educational Master Plan 2011-2014
•
•
•
Expressway (SB1456)
Enforcing prerequisites
Reading Apprenticeship
√ Commitment to
Student Learning
•
Transfer Pathway –
Partnership with CSUDH
STEM
Talent Search
√ Support
Students Preparing
for Transfer
•
•
•
•
28
POPP Partnership with LA √ Build on West’s
Success in CTE to
Police Dept.
Improve the Whole
Aviation award
College
29

WLAC Educational Master Plan 2011-2014
•
LEARN Boot Camp
•
•
•
Quality Matters
Digital Design Studio
FELI (Five-Day Experiential
Learning Institute
•
•
•
58 submitted proposals
√ Resources &
$1M NSF grant pending award
Collaboration
In development – 3 proposals
for $16.5M
√ Support the
College’s Foundation
Skills Program
√ Ensure the Highest
Levels of Educational
Quality within West’s
Diversified Modes of
Instructional Delivery
Integrated
Planning,
Budgeting and
Governance
Process
30
ThankYou
31