Document 12084643

advertisement
West Los Angeles College
2013 Draft Facilities Master Plan Update
November 20, 2013
Facilities Master Planning and Oversight Committee
PURPOSE OF THE MASTER PLAN UPDATE
• Align College Facilities Planning with Needs Identified in the Educational
Master Planning Process
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Match Facility Performance to the Requirements of Identified Needs
Plan for Optimal Utilization Rates
Design for Flexible Teaching Space and Facilitate Diverse Pedagogies
Minimize Cost of Ownership by Limiting Footprint and Updating Existing
Facilities
Establish Infrastructure/Technology for the Future
Optimize Student Engagement and Provide Communal, Public Space
Advance Program Adjacencies and Reinforce Campus Academic Core
Integrate Accessibility into Design
Respond to Critiques of Construction Agenda
Page 2
PURPOSE OF THE MASTER PLAN UPDATE cont’d
• Build for 2026, Plan through 2036
• Maintain CEQA Compliance
• Support Growth Across College without Over-Building
• Support Projected Growth Rates Across Campus to 2026
• No Programs Underserved
• Projected 2036 Capacity Demands Not Provided “Too Early”
• Allows for Future State Funding
• Provide Foundation for Next Master-Planning Agenda
• Remain Consistent with a 45-Year History of Long Outlook, Pragmatic
Development
Page 3
MASTER PLAN UPDATE CRITERIA
Page 4
Reference Documents
Educational Master Plan
•
•
•
•
•
Required by California Community College Chancellor’s Office
Developed and Managed by the College
Current Plan for Period 2009-2014
“Growth Trends” are Phase 1 of the Educational Master Plan, 2014-19
Phase 2 of the Educational Master Plan in progress (2013-14): programs and
processes to implement Phase 1 and achieve educational attainment.
Page 5
Reference Documents
Short-Range Facilities Master Plan (Operations)
•
•
•
•
•
Required by California Community College Chancellor’s Office
Developed and Managed by the College
Required to Support the Educational Master Plan
Requires Facilities Master Plan & Oversight Committee Approval
Date Completed: October 2, 2013
Page 6
Reference Documents
Current/Approved 2009 Long-Range Facilities Master Plan
(Construction)
• Reasons to Update Long-Range Facilities Master Plan
• BOT rule 2605.1 / Admin Reg B-24 / Ed Code 70902
• Incorporates changes generated by Education Master Plan
• Updated to reflect Short-Range Facilities Master Plan
• Revised to include building name changes
• Date Approved by Board of Trustees – August 2010
• Planning up to 2022
Page 7
Current/Approved 2009 Long-Range Facilities Master Plan
On August 11, 2010, the LACCD Board of Trustees
1. Approved the 2009 WLAC Facilities Master Plan Update (as Revised June 2010)
2. Certified the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
Page 8
MASTER PLAN UPDATE CRITERIA
Page 9
GROWTH PROJECTION FACTORS
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Available Funding (vs. Demand)
Service Area Population Growth
Historic Enrollment Trends
Participation Rate (Enrollment ÷ Service Area Population)
Full-Time Students as % of Total Student Population (WSCH per Student)
Influence of Economic Conditions on Enrollment
Influence of UC and CSU System Changes
Success Rates of Area High Schools
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Page 13
Page 14
VS.
Page 15
Page 16
Page 17
Page 18
ADDITIONAL FACTORS CONSIDERED
• An increasing number of residents are returning to community colleges to
train for new careers as a result of job losses stemming from the Great
Recession. (Source: California Postsecondary Education Commission)
• UC and CSU are increasing fees, furloughing faculty, and limiting future
enrollments. (Source: California Postsecondary Education Commission)
• The top ten WLAC feeder schools have an average Academic
Performance Index (API) ranking of 701; the State goal for each school is
800. (Source: WLAC Office of Research & Planning; CA Department of Education)
• The College has met/exceeded funded enrollment capacity every year
since 2000.
• The inclusion of Beverly Hills and Marina del Rey in the College’s Service
Area affects demographic data—population change, educational
attainment, etc.—though the College serves 70% African American and
Latino students who do not come from these area.
• The high school graduation rate from 2008-2011 in the College’s Service
Area has increased 1.17%, compared to -0.11% District-wide. This
suggests that the number of likely students is increasing at a faster rate
than total population growth.
Page 19
SUMMARY OF COLLEGE-WIDE GROWTH PROJECTION
On-Campus CREDIT CENSUS ENROLLMENT (i.e. Headcount)
• Fall 2012: 8,233
• 2036: 15,300
• 186% Total Growth @ 2.6% per Year
On-Campus STUDENT CONTACT HOURS (per Semester)
• Fall 2012: 1,293,933
• 2036: 2,731,636
• 211% Total Growth @ 3.2% per Year
Note: Projections determined through Phase I of the Educational Master
Plan process and approved by the WLAC Academic Senate and College
Council.
Page 20
EDUCATIONAL MASTER PLAN, 2014-19, PHASE 1
Approved by the WLAC Academic Senate and College Council
Page 21
MASTER PLAN UPDATE CRITERIA
Page 22
CURRENT & PROJECTED
INSTRUCTIONAL FACILITY UTILIZATION
Page 23
Page 24
MASTER PLAN UPDATE CRITERIA
Page 25
GEOGRAPHIC AREAS SERVED BY CAMPUS
Geographic Areas
Served
• Hills
• Westside
• Central City
• South Los Angeles
Peer Institutions
• City College
• Southwest College
• Santa Monica
College
• Trade Tech College
• El Camino College
Core Service Area
Extended Service Area
Page 26
MASTER PLAN UPDATE CRITERIA
Page 27
PRIORITIES
Toward 2026 Instructional Space Needs
Page 28
PRIORITIES (Unfunded)
Toward 2036 Instructional / Support Space Needs
Page 29
Page 30
Page 31
Page 32
Page 33
Page 34
Page 35
Page 36
Page 37
Page 38
Page 39
Page 40
Page 41
Page 42
Page 43
Page 44
Page 45
Page 46
Page 47
MASTER PLAN UPDATE CRITERIA
Page 48
Current Campus Map (2013)
Page 49
Proposed 2013 Construction Master Plan Update (Bond Funded)
Page 50
Projected Required Future Facilities (Beyond Current Bond Program)
Page 51
West Los Angeles College
2013 Draft Facilities Master Plan Update
Supplemental Materials
November 20, 2013
Facilities Master Planning and Oversight Committee
SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS
CONTENTS
1. Additional Reference Documents………………………….......…pg. 3
2. Space Inventory & Facilities Assessment………………………....pg. 8
3. Proposed Facilities Master Plan: Strategies & Budget……....….pg. 12
Additional Reference Documents
Page 3
Page 4
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
• The approved 2009 Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR)
studied and defined the mitigation measures required for a CEQAcompliant, maximum 15,300 On-Campus Student Headcount.
• The SEIR specifies a minimum parking count of 2,487.
Page 5
2003 Campus Map
Page 6
2005 Master Plan
Page 7
2009 Master Plan (Approved Drawing)
Page 8
Space Inventory & Facility Assessment
Page 9
SUMMARY OF FACILITIES ASSESSMENT
• A large number of instructional spaces are currently under-utilized
because the size, configuration, and technology capabilities do not match
the facilities requirements established through Program Review and the
Educational Master Plan:
• 28 General Lecture Rooms
• 5 General Laboratory Rooms
• 3 Specialized Laboratory Rooms
• The majority of existing under-utilized spaces may be readily remodeled
into “needed” spaces but may not be suitable for conversion to highly
specialized labs.
• Original campus buildings are substandard in a number of areas, including:
• IT/AV Capabilities
• Wear and Tear
Page 10
Page 11
Page 12
Proposed Facilities Master Plan
Strategies & Budget
Page 13
SUMMARY OF MASTER PLAN STRATEGIES
• Remodel Under-Utilized or Inactive Spaces
• Limit New Construction to Unique, Specialized Spaces
• Locate Programs to Improve Departmental Cohesion and Inter-Departmental
Synergies
• Provide a Student-centric Campus Environment
• Eliminate Temporary Modular Buildings and 1969 Bungalow Buildings
• Eliminate the Need for Swing Space
• Design within Budget and Prioritize Projects to Guard Against Contingencies
Page 14
Page 15
Proposed Master
Plan – STUDENT
Proposed
Master PlanACTIVITY
– STUDENT ACTIVITY
Page 16
Proposed 2013 Construction Master Plan Update
View of Campus Core (East to West)
Page 17
Download