Page 1 of 16
Page 2 of 16
Page 3 of 16
Page 4 of 16
Page 5 of 16
Concepts and Definitions for the Growth/Restoration Funding Proposal
Adult Population: Population ages 18 to 54. The source of population data is the 2000 Decennial Census
or the American Community Survey (ACS).
American Community Survey (ACS): A continuous survey that, since 2010, has replaced the long form
of the decennial census and is the source of annual updates on educational attainment and population
for use in the LACCD growth allocation budget model. Since the ACS is based on an annual sample that is
smaller than the decennial census sample, the ACS data for the 5-year estimates are collected over a 60month period (2007-2011) and are combined to produce reliable numbers for small geographical areas,
such as zip codes. 2013 was the first year that the 5-year estimates were available at the zip code level
from the ACS. Collecting the data over 5 years smoothes out any spikes in the change in population.
Also, since there is substantial overlap in the data used for consecutive 5-year estimates (i.e., 4 years of
overlapping coverage), differences when comparing the data from consecutive 5-year ACS surveys are
driven by non-overlapping years.
Base Revenue: Within the LACCD budget model, revenue, with the exception of annual increments
derived from growth funding, that make up each college’s budget allocation.
Blended rate: Within the application of the State Growth Allocation Model (a.k.a., State Model), a
growth rate that is the average rate of adult population growth and the growth of high school
graduates, when these rates are weighted, respectively, by the proportion of each district’s FTES
generated by its students who are over age 21 and who are age 21 and younger.
College Service Area: A group of (mostly) mutually exclusive zip codes assigned to each college.
Assignment was principally based on college share of average 2000-2004 fall enrollment in a zip code
(the college with the largest share of community college enrollment within a zip code was assigned that
zip code). These zip codes were identified as those belonging to each college’s Central Study Area, a
grouping developed to accompany the External Scan developed by the Madrid Consulting Group in
2006-07.
Educational Attainment: For persons 25 years old and over, educational attainment is the highest level
of education that an individual has completed. These data are collected and reported by the U.S.
Census Bureau.
Growth Cap: An annual growth rate, determined by the budget of the State of California and which,
when applied to each district’s FTES and reimbursement rates, is an annual increment to its
apportionment funding.
Growth Revenue: An incremental amount of revenue available to California Community College
districts for operational funding, as determined by the California State Budget, provided that districts
achieve an increase in enrollments (FTES) at least equal to the annual growth cap. Currently, for each
college in the LACCD, growth revenue is determined by application of the growth cap to each college’s
FTES.
High School Graduates: The number of high school graduates in a given year (by high school) obtained
from the California Department of Education (DataQuest) website. When assembled for each college,
high school graduates were those from the top ten high schools assigned to each college based on each
college’s average fall enrollment in 2009‐2011.
Low Educational Attainment: Persons with low educational attainment are defined as those persons
age 25 years and over whose educational attainment is completion of a high school education (or
equivalency) or below.
Participation Rate: Enrollment divided by college age population, calculated for a particular area or
region.
SB 361: The current method used to allocate growth revenue to colleges within the LACCD which
Page 1 of 2
Page 6 of 16
Concepts and Definitions for the Growth/Restoration Funding Proposal
involves applying the growth cap (to each college’s base FTES) and multiplying this by reimbursement
rates for each type of FTES (credit, non-credit, and enhanced non-credit).
Share of Population: The population share is defined as the number of persons aged 18-54 in a
particular area or region divided by the total number of persons aged 18 to 54 (considering all areas or
regions).
Share of Underserved: The share of underserved is defined as the number of persons with low
educational attainment (in an area or region) divided by the total number of persons having low
educational attainment (considering all areas or regions).
State Model: The method used by the State of California to determine a district-specific growth rate
(growth cap). The model (also called the Growth Allotment Formula) is principally based on each
district’s change in adult population and change in high school graduates. It also includes augmentation
factors for underserved population and new facilities.
Underserved: A population or area that is not receiving adequate educational services as measured by
educational attainment or total adult population.
Page 2 of 2
Change in Adult Population (Ages 18-54) from 2000 Census to 2007-2011 5-Year ACS
2000 Census
2007-2011 5- Percent
Adult
Year ACS Adult Change in
Population
Population
Adult
Ages 18-54 (in Ages 18-54 (in Population
Central Zip
Central Zip
Ages 18-54
Codes for Each Codes for Each (from 2000 to
College)
College)
2007-2011)
College Service Area
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
Average
497,272
615,411
260,949
202,758
365,231
296,088
281,865
473,979
395,617
376,574
481,245
616,596
260,851
212,250
374,236
306,700
286,125
481,588
396,153
379,527
-3.22%
0.19%
-0.04%
4.68%
2.47%
3.58%
1.51%
1.61%
0.14%
1.21%
Change in High School Graduates
Sum of
Sum of
Sum of
Sum of
Graduates
Graduates
Graduates
Graduates
2007-2008
2008-2009
2009-2010
2010-2011
College
City
4,611
4,358
4,381
4,121
East
5,882
6,014
6,005
6,245
Harbor
5,204
5,252
5,428
5,388
Mission
5,981
5,673
5,423
5,625
Pierce
5,638
5,839
5,832
5,730
Southwest
3,535
3,821
3,914
3,712
Trade
4,085
3,985
4,401
4,048
Valley
6,090
5,876
5,525
5,696
West
4,240
4,498
4,482
4,383
Average
5,030
5,035
5,043
4,994
Fall 2011 FTES
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
Average
Page 7 of 16
Fall 2011 FTES Fall 2011 FTES Fall 2011 Total
Over the Age Age 21 and
FTES
of 21
Younger
4,952
1,628
6,580
6,431
4,191
10,622
2,012
1,616
3,628
1,849
1,316
3,165
3,608
3,245
6,853
1,420
586
2,006
4,514
1,351
5,865
3,594
2,307
5,901
2,300
1,166
3,466
3,409
1,934
5,343
% Change in HS
Graduates
2007-2008 to
2008-2009
-5.49%
2.24%
0.92%
-5.15%
3.57%
8.09%
-2.45%
-3.51%
6.08%
0.48%
% Change in
HS Graduates
2008-2009 to
2009-2010
0.53%
-0.15%
3.35%
-4.41%
-0.12%
2.43%
10.44%
-5.97%
-0.36%
0.64%
% Change in HS 3-Year Average
Graduates
% Change in HS
2009-2010 to Graduates
2010-2011
-5.93%
-3.63%
4.00%
2.03%
-0.74%
1.18%
3.72%
-1.94%
-1.75%
0.57%
-5.16%
1.79%
-8.02%
-0.01%
3.10%
-2.13%
-2.21%
1.17%
-1.44%
-0.11%
Educational Attainment Rates from 2007-2011 5-Year ACS for Adult Population Age 25 Years and Over
Less than 9th 9th to 12th
High school
Some college, Associate's
Bachelor's
grade
grade, no
graduate
no degree
degree
degree
diploma
(includes
equivalency)
College Service Area
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Service Area
Average
Page 8 of 16
Graduate or
professional
degree
Some college
and above
14.6%
28.1%
9.3%
18.5%
8.2%
20.4%
28.7%
14.4%
9.6%
9.4%
16.0%
8.5%
13.3%
6.6%
14.7%
17.3%
9.8%
7.8%
17.9%
24.0%
20.6%
23.7%
19.7%
25.4%
22.2%
20.1%
17.0%
15.9%
14.8%
19.9%
18.5%
20.7%
20.9%
13.4%
19.9%
20.2%
5.6%
5.1%
7.9%
6.7%
7.7%
6.3%
3.9%
6.5%
6.1%
25.7%
8.7%
22.0%
13.8%
24.0%
8.8%
10.3%
20.3%
24.0%
10.9%
3.3%
11.8%
5.5%
13.2%
3.5%
4.1%
8.9%
15.2%
58.0%
32.0%
61.6%
44.5%
65.5%
39.4%
31.7%
55.7%
65.6%
16.9%
11.5%
21.2%
18.2%
6.2%
17.5%
8.5%
50.5%
Ratio of Average
"Underserved"
Educational
Augmentation
Attainment Rate to
College's
Educational
Attainment Rate
0.87
1.58
0.58%
0.82
1.13
0.13%
0.77
1.28
0.28%
1.59
0.59%
0.91
0.77
1.00
Educational Attainment from 2007-2011 5-Year ACS for Adult Population Age 25 Years and Over
Less than 9th 9th to 12th
High school
Some college, Associate's
Bachelor's
Graduate or
High School
Some college and Total N
grade
grade, no
graduate
no degree
degree
degree
professional
Education or
above
diploma
(includes
degree
Lower
College Service Area
equivalency)
City
82,113
52,768
100,613
89,055
31,140
143,985
61,275
235,494
325,455
560,949
East
195,094
111,126
166,948
103,105
35,679
60,486
23,078
473,168
222,348
695,516
Harbor
31,833
28,962
70,170
67,824
27,068
75,085
40,262
130,965
210,239
341,204
Mission
45,934
32,915
58,812
46,025
16,673
34,220
13,606
137,661
110,524
248,185
Pierce
39,377
31,616
94,871
99,379
36,881
115,201
63,290
165,864
314,751
480,615
Southwest
69,260
49,965
86,285
70,809
21,214
29,853
11,849
205,510
133,725
339,235
Trade
86,122
51,947
66,620
40,133
11,632
30,913
12,393
204,689
95,071
299,760
Valley
81,684
55,843
113,921
113,147
37,103
115,514
50,655
251,448
316,419
567,867
West
47,716
38,639
84,192
100,227
30,402
119,130
75,615
170,547
325,374
495,921
TOTAL
679,133
453,781
842,432
729,704
247,792
724,387
352,023
1,975,346
2,053,906
4,029,252
Page 9 of 16
Application of the State Model
College
Service
Area
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
Average
(1) Percent
Change in
Adult
Population
Ages 18-54
(from 2000
Census to
2007-2011 5Year ACS)
-3.22%
0.19%
-0.04%
4.68%
2.47%
3.58%
1.51%
1.61%
0.14%
1.21%
(2) % Change
in High School
Graduates
2009-2010 to
2010-2011
(3) 3-Year
Average %
Change in High
School
Graduates
(4) Fall
2011 FTES
Over the
Age of 21
-5.93%
4.00%
-0.74%
3.72%
-1.75%
-5.16%
-8.02%
3.10%
-2.21%
-1.44%
-3.63%
2.03%
1.18%
-1.94%
0.57%
1.79%
-0.01%
-2.13%
1.17%
-0.11%
4,952
6,431
2,012
1,849
3,608
1,420
4,514
3,594
2,300
3,409
(5) Fall 2011 (6) Fall
FTES Age 21 2011 Total
and
FTES
Younger
1,628
4,191
1,616
1,316
3,245
586
1,351
2,307
1,166
1,934
6,580
10,622
3,628
3,165
6,853
2,006
5,865
5,901
3,466
5,343
(7) Percent
Change in
Adult
Population
Ages 18-54 X
Fall 2011 FTES
Over 21
12.38
86.56
88.96
50.89
68.22
57.70
3.12
(8) Change in
High School
Graduates X
Fall 2011 FTES
Age 21 and
Younger
167.50
19.05
49.02
18.35
10.48
71.40
13.68
(9)
"BLENDED
RATE"
[(7)+(8)]/(6)
0.00%
1.69%
0.53%
4.28%
1.57%
3.06%
1.16%
2.19%
0.48%
1.66%
(10) Higher
Rate of
Blended
Rate or
Percent
Change in
Adult
Population
0.00%
1.69%
0.53%
4.68%
2.47%
3.58%
1.51%
2.19%
0.48%
1.90%
(11) Educational
Attainment Rate:
Proportion of
Adult Population
Age 25+ with
Some College and
Above (20072011 5-Year ACS)
58.0%
32.0%
61.6%
44.5%
65.5%
39.4%
31.7%
55.7%
65.6%
50.5%
(12) Ratio of
Average
Educational
Attainment
Rate to
College's
Educational
Attainment
Rate
0.87
1.58
0.82
1.13
0.77
1.28
1.59
0.91
0.77
1.00
(13)
"Underserved"
Augmentation
0.58%
0.13%
0.28%
0.59%
(14) FINAL
GROWTH
RATE
[(10)+(13)]
0.00%
2.27%
0.53%
4.81%
2.47%
3.86%
2.10%
2.19%
0.48%
2.08%
Page 10 of 16
Data Used in Allocation Model Simulations
Updated Data from 2007-2011 5-Year ACS
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
Adult Final Growth
Rate (based on Population from 2007‐2011 5‐
2007-2011 5Year ACS
Year ACS)
0.00%
481,245
2.27%
616,596
0.53%
260,851
4.81%
212,250
2.47%
374,236
3.86%
306,700
2.10%
286,125
2.19%
481,588
0.48%
396,153
3,415,744
% Population
(P)
14.1%
18.1%
7.6%
6.2%
11.0%
9.0%
8.4%
14.1%
11.6%
100.0%
*Number of individuals over age 25 having a high school education or lower
Underserved
Population*
from 2007-2011
% District
5-Year ACS Underserved (U)
235,494
11.9%
473,168
24.0%
130,965
6.6%
137,661
7.0%
165,864
8.4%
205,510
10.4%
204,689
10.4%
251,448
12.7%
170,547
8.6%
1,975,346
100.0%
Page 11 of 16
Funding Simulations Using
Population or Underserved, SB361, and State Model
Based on Updated Data from 2007-2011 5-year ACS and 4% Cap
Scenario I: 80% SB 361; 20% State Model
Percent Weight==>
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
Population or
Underserved
0.0%
SB 361
80.0%
State Model with
Educ Attainment
20.0%
$0 $1,974,548
$0 $3,050,455
$0
$950,606
$0
$854,200
$0 $2,040,196
$0
$712,337
$0 $1,697,973
$0 $1,812,232
$0
$987,752
$0 $14,080,299
$0
$892,328
$64,274
$529,545
$647,720
$354,424
$459,626
$510,514
$61,644
$3,520,075
Effective
100% Current Funding
Total Method (SB361)
Rate
100%
$1,974,548
$3,942,783
$1,014,880
$1,383,745
$2,687,916
$1,066,761
$2,157,599
$2,322,746
$1,049,397
$17,600,374
$2,468,185
$3,813,069
$1,188,258
$1,067,750
$2,550,245
$890,421
$2,122,466
$2,265,290
$1,234,691
$17,600,374
3.20%
4.14%
3.42%
5.18%
4.22%
4.79%
4.07%
4.10%
3.40%
4.00%
Scenario II: 80% SB 361; 10% Adult Population Share; 10% State Model
Percent Weight==>
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
SB 361
80.0%
State Model with
Educ Attainment
10.0%
$247,972 $1,974,548
$317,715 $3,050,455
$134,409
$950,606
$109,366
$854,200
$192,833 $2,040,196
$158,034
$712,337
$147,432 $1,697,973
$248,149 $1,812,232
$204,127
$987,752
$1,760,037 $14,080,299
$0
$446,164
$32,137
$264,772
$323,860
$177,212
$229,813
$255,257
$30,822
$1,760,037
Population
10.0%
Effective
100% Current Funding
Total Method (SB361)
Rate
100%
$2,222,520
$3,814,334
$1,117,152
$1,228,339
$2,556,890
$1,047,583
$2,075,218
$2,315,638
$1,222,701
$17,600,374
$2,468,185
$3,813,069
$1,188,258
$1,067,750
$2,550,245
$890,421
$2,122,466
$2,265,290
$1,234,691
$17,600,374
3.60%
4.00%
3.76%
4.60%
4.01%
4.71%
3.91%
4.09%
3.96%
4.00%
Scenario III: 80% SB 361; 10% Underserved Population Share; 10% State
Model
Percent Weight==>
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
SB 361
80.0%
State Model with
Educ Attainment
10.0%
$209,826 $1,974,548
$421,594 $3,050,455
$116,690
$950,606
$122,656
$854,200
$147,785 $2,040,196
$183,110
$712,337
$182,378 $1,697,973
$224,041 $1,812,232
$151,958
$987,752
$1,760,037 $14,080,299
$0
$446,164
$32,137
$264,772
$323,860
$177,212
$229,813
$255,257
$30,822
$1,760,037
Underserved
10.0%
Effective
100% Current Funding
Total Method (SB361)
Rate
100%
$2,184,374
$3,918,213
$1,099,433
$1,241,628
$2,511,841
$1,072,659
$2,110,164
$2,291,530
$1,170,532
$17,600,374
$2,468,185
$3,813,069
$1,188,258
$1,067,750
$2,550,245
$890,421
$2,122,466
$2,265,290
$1,234,691
$17,600,374
3.54%
4.11%
3.70%
4.65%
3.94%
4.82%
3.98%
4.05%
3.79%
4.00%
Page 12 of 16
Funding Simulations Using
Population or Underserved, SB361, and State Model
Based on Updated Data from 2007-2011 5-year ACS and 4% Cap
Scenario IV: 80% SB 361; 20% Underserved Population Share
Percent Weight==>
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
SB 361
80.0%
State Model with
Educ Attainment
0.0%
$419,651 $1,974,548
$843,187 $3,050,455
$233,380
$950,606
$245,312
$854,200
$295,570 $2,040,196
$366,220
$712,337
$364,757 $1,697,973
$448,081 $1,812,232
$303,915
$987,752
$3,520,075 $14,080,299
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Underserved
20.0%
Effective
100% Current Funding
Total Method (SB361)
Rate
100%
$2,394,199
$3,893,642
$1,183,986
$1,099,512
$2,335,767
$1,078,557
$2,062,729
$2,260,313
$1,291,668
$17,600,374
$2,468,185
$3,813,069
$1,188,258
$1,067,750
$2,550,245
$890,421
$2,122,466
$2,265,290
$1,234,691
$17,600,374
3.88%
4.08%
3.99%
4.12%
3.66%
4.85%
3.89%
3.99%
4.18%
4.00%
Page 13 of 16
Funding Simulations Using
Population or Underserved, SB361, and State Model
Based on Updated Data from 2007-2011 5-year ACS and 2% Cap
Scenario I: 80% SB 361; 20% State Model
Percent Weight==>
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
Population or
Underserved
0.0%
SB 361
80.0%
State Model with
Educ Attainment
20.0%
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$987,274
$1,525,228
$475,303
$427,100
$1,020,098
$356,168
$848,986
$906,116
$493,876
$7,040,150
$0
$446,164
$32,137
$264,772
$323,860
$177,212
$229,813
$255,257
$30,822
$1,760,037
Effective
100% Current Funding
Total Method (SB361)
Rate
100%
$987,274
$1,971,391
$507,440
$691,872
$1,343,958
$533,380
$1,078,800
$1,161,373
$524,698
$8,800,187
$1,234,093
$1,906,534
$594,129
$533,875
$1,275,123
$445,211
$1,061,233
$1,132,645
$617,345
$8,800,187
1.60%
2.07%
1.71%
2.59%
2.11%
2.40%
2.03%
2.05%
1.70%
2.00%
Scenario II: 80% SB 361; 10% Adult Population Share; 10% State Model
Percent Weight==>
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
Population
10.0%
SB 361
80.0%
State Model with
Educ Attainment
10.0%
$123,986
$158,857
$67,205
$54,683
$96,417
$79,017
$73,716
$124,074
$102,063
$880,019
$987,274
$1,525,228
$475,303
$427,100
$1,020,098
$356,168
$848,986
$906,116
$493,876
$7,040,150
$0
$223,082
$16,068
$132,386
$161,930
$88,606
$114,907
$127,629
$15,411
$880,019
Effective
100% Current Funding
Total Method (SB361)
Rate
100%
$1,111,260
$1,907,167
$558,576
$614,169
$1,278,445
$523,791
$1,037,609
$1,157,819
$611,351
$8,800,187
$1,234,093
$1,906,534
$594,129
$533,875
$1,275,123
$445,211
$1,061,233
$1,132,645
$617,345
$8,800,187
1.80%
2.00%
1.88%
2.30%
2.01%
2.35%
1.96%
2.04%
1.98%
2.00%
Scenario III: 80% SB 361; 10% Underserved Population Share; 10% State
Model
Percent Weight==>
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
Underserved
10.0%
SB 361
80.0%
State Model with
Educ Attainment
10.0%
$104,913
$210,797
$58,345
$61,328
$73,893
$91,555
$91,189
$112,020
$75,979
$880,019
$987,274
$1,525,228
$475,303
$427,100
$1,020,098
$356,168
$848,986
$906,116
$493,876
$7,040,150
$0
$223,082
$16,068
$132,386
$161,930
$88,606
$114,907
$127,629
$15,411
$880,019
Effective
100% Current Funding
Total Method (SB361)
Rate
100%
$1,092,187
$1,959,106
$549,716
$620,814
$1,255,921
$536,329
$1,055,082
$1,145,765
$585,266
$8,800,187
$1,234,093
$1,906,534
$594,129
$533,875
$1,275,123
$445,211
$1,061,233
$1,132,645
$617,345
$8,800,187
1.77%
2.06%
1.85%
2.33%
1.97%
2.41%
1.99%
2.02%
1.90%
2.00%
Page 14 of 16
Funding Simulations Using
Population or Underserved, SB361, and State Model
Based on Updated Data from 2007-2011 5-year ACS and 2% Cap
Scenario IV: 80% SB 361; 20% Underserved Population Share
Percent Weight==>
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
Underserved
20.0%
SB 361
80.0%
State Model with
Educ Attainment
0.0%
$209,826
$421,594
$116,690
$122,656
$147,785
$183,110
$182,378
$224,041
$151,958
$1,760,037
$987,274
$1,525,228
$475,303
$427,100
$1,020,098
$356,168
$848,986
$906,116
$493,876
$7,040,150
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Effective
100% Current Funding
Total Method (SB361)
Rate
100%
$1,197,100
$1,946,821
$591,993
$549,756
$1,167,883
$539,278
$1,031,365
$1,130,157
$645,834
$8,800,187
$1,234,093
$1,906,534
$594,129
$533,875
$1,275,123
$445,211
$1,061,233
$1,132,645
$617,345
$8,800,187
1.94%
2.04%
1.99%
2.06%
1.83%
2.42%
1.94%
2.00%
2.09%
2.00%
Page 15 of 16
Funding Simulations Using
Population or Underserved, SB361, and State Model
Based on Updated Data from 2007-2011 5-year ACS and 1.63% Cap
Scenario I: 80% SB 361; 20% State Model
Percent Weight==>
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
Population or
Underserved
0.0%
SB 361
80.0%
State Model with
Educ Attainment
20.0%
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$804,628
$1,243,060
$387,372
$348,086
$831,380
$290,277
$691,924
$738,484
$402,509
$5,737,722
$0
$363,623
$26,191
$215,789
$263,946
$144,428
$187,298
$208,035
$25,120
$1,434,430
Effective
100% Current Funding
Total Method (SB361)
Rate
100%
$804,628
$1,606,684
$413,563
$563,876
$1,095,326
$434,705
$879,222
$946,519
$427,629
$7,172,152
$1,005,785
$1,553,826
$484,215
$435,108
$1,039,225
$362,847
$864,905
$923,106
$503,136
$7,172,152
1.30%
1.69%
1.39%
2.11%
1.72%
1.95%
1.66%
1.67%
1.39%
1.63%
Scenario II: 80% SB 361; 10% Adult Population Share; 10% State Model
Percent Weight==>
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
Population
10.0%
SB 361
80.0%
State Model with
Educ Attainment
10.0%
$101,049
$129,469
$54,772
$44,567
$78,580
$64,399
$60,079
$101,121
$83,182
$717,215
$804,628
$1,243,060
$387,372
$348,086
$831,380
$290,277
$691,924
$738,484
$402,509
$5,737,722
$0
$181,812
$13,096
$107,895
$131,973
$72,214
$93,649
$104,017
$12,560
$717,215
Effective
100% Current Funding
Total Method (SB361)
Rate
100%
$905,677
$1,554,341
$455,239
$500,548
$1,041,933
$426,890
$845,651
$943,622
$498,251
$7,172,152
$1,005,785
$1,553,826
$484,215
$435,108
$1,039,225
$362,847
$864,905
$923,106
$503,136
$7,172,152
1.47%
1.63%
1.53%
1.88%
1.63%
1.92%
1.59%
1.67%
1.61%
1.63%
Scenario III: 80% SB 361; 10% Underserved Population Share; 10% State
Model
Percent Weight==>
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
Underserved
10.0%
SB 361
80.0%
State Model with
Educ Attainment
10.0%
$85,504
$171,799
$47,551
$49,982
$60,222
$74,617
$74,319
$91,297
$61,923
$717,215
$804,628
$1,243,060
$387,372
$348,086
$831,380
$290,277
$691,924
$738,484
$402,509
$5,737,722
$0
$181,812
$13,096
$107,895
$131,973
$72,214
$93,649
$104,017
$12,560
$717,215
Effective
100% Current Funding
Total Method (SB361)
Rate
100%
$890,132
$1,596,672
$448,019
$505,964
$1,023,575
$437,108
$859,892
$933,798
$476,992
$7,172,152
$1,005,785
$1,553,826
$484,215
$435,108
$1,039,225
$362,847
$864,905
$923,106
$503,136
$7,172,152
1.44%
1.67%
1.51%
1.90%
1.61%
1.96%
1.62%
1.65%
1.55%
1.63%
Page 16 of 16
Funding Simulations Using
Population or Underserved, SB361, and State Model
Based on Updated Data from 2007-2011 5-year ACS and 1.63% Cap
Scenario IV: 80% SB 361; 20% Underserved Population Share
Percent Weight==>
College
City
East
Harbor
Mission
Pierce
Southwest
Trade
Valley
West
College Total
Underserved
20.0%
SB 361
80.0%
State Model with
Educ Attainment
0.0%
$171,008
$343,599
$95,102
$99,965
$120,445
$149,235
$148,638
$182,593
$123,846
$1,434,430
$804,628
$1,243,060
$387,372
$348,086
$831,380
$290,277
$691,924
$738,484
$402,509
$5,737,722
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
Effective
100% Current Funding
Total Method (SB361)
Rate
100%
$975,636
$1,586,659
$482,474
$448,051
$951,825
$439,512
$840,562
$921,078
$526,355
$7,172,152
$1,005,785
$1,553,826
$484,215
$435,108
$1,039,225
$362,847
$864,905
$923,106
$503,136
$7,172,152
1.58%
1.66%
1.62%
1.68%
1.49%
1.97%
1.58%
1.63%
1.71%
1.63%