UCL DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL PHYSICS AND BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING
MPHYGB97: Medical Physics MSc Project
STUDENT ASSESSMENT FORM
Name of Student:________________________________
Name of Assessor: _________________________________
First Supervisor
Tick box:
Project Outline
(out of 100)
Progress Report
(out of 100)
Second Supervisor
Final Report
(out of 100)
Mark:
Marking Guidelines
Project Planning
Scientific
contribution and
understanding
Quality and
amount of work
Typographical
errors and tables
Demonstrates a
(descriptor)
understanding of
techniques and
methodology
applicable to their
project, including
(descriptor)
evidence of selfdirection.
Demonstrates a
(descriptor)
knowledge of the
relevant subject,
and its application,
showing(descriptor)
abilities in
evaluating new
lines of enquiry or
identifying practical
limitation.
The work shows a
(descriptor) ability
to critically
evaluating different
types of evidence
from literature
/experiment and a
(descriptor) quantity
and originality of
scientific work.
Grammar and
syntax, clarity of
scientific writing,
tables and figures
and referencing
are, overall, done to
a (descriptor)
standard.
Descriptors
40% - Poor
50% - Acceptable
60% - Good
70% - Strong
80% - Excellent
Assessment Guidelines




Marks may be deducted for late submission of the written components if these are submitted late
without sufficient reason (up to a maximum of 5 marks each).
Significant reports (about one side of A4) on the Final Report are expected from both supervisors.
The first and second supervisors must produce INDEPENDENT reports. A single report signed by
both supervisors is not acceptable.
The two completed student assessment forms and one copy of the Final Report should be handed to
Mohini in the Medical Physics & Bioengineering department office.
Malet Place Engineering Building, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7679 0200 Fax: +44 (0)20 7679 0255
www.ucl.ac.uk/medphys
Comments on Project Outline
Mark: __.out of 100.
The mark of the project outline counts for 5% of the total mark of the MSc project.
Please comment on the quality and content. Is the student engaging? Does the student understands the aims
and does the student has an understanding of the work involved?
Comments on Progress Report
Mark: __ out of 100.
The mark of the project outline counts for 10% of the total mark of the MSc project.
Please comment on the quality and content. Is the student engaging? Does the student understands the aims
and does the student has an understanding of the work involved?
Comments on MSc Final Report
Mark: __ out of 100.
The mark of the MSc Final Report counts for 60% of the total mark of the MSc project.
The marks awarded for the MSc Final Report should be broken down as follows:




Project planning: 10 marks
Scientific contribution by student and understanding of context: 40 marks
Quality and amount of work: 40 marks
Standard of presentation including referencing: 10 marks
Please provide an extensive report below on the quality and content of the student’s Final Report, and on the
student’s performance on the project in general. This needs to be a significant report (one side of A4).
(an indication of how the project was planned and executed; the level of supervision required; the significance
of the student’s contribution; the student’s experimental ability; etc)
Project planning:
/10
Scientific contribution:
/40
Quality and amount:
/40
Presentation:
/10
Malet Place Engineering Building, University College London, Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
Tel: +44 (0)20 7679 0200 Fax: +44 (0)20 7679 0255
www.ucl.ac.uk/medphys