Course Form I. Summary of Proposed Changes Dept / Program Wildlife Biology Course Title Conducting strong inference science Prefix and Course # WBIO 545 Short Title (max. 26 characters incl. spaces) Strong inference science Summarize the change(s) proposed Switch from 595 to new course number II. Endorsement/Approvals Complete the form and obtain signatures before submitting to Faculty Senate Office Please type / print name Signature Requestor: Thomas E Martin Phone/ email : Tom.martin@umontana.edu Program Chair/Director: Daniel Pletscher Other affected programs Dean: Date Perry Brown Are other departments/programs affected by this Please obtain signature(s) from the modification because of Chair/Director of any such department/ (a) required courses incl. prerequisites or corequisites, program (above) before submission (b) perceived overlap in content areas (c) cross-listing of coursework III: To Add a New Course Syllabus and assessment information is required (paste syllabus into section V or attach). Course should have internal coherence and clear focus. NO Common Course Numbering Review: Does an equivalent course exist elsewhere YES X in the MUS? Do the proposed abbreviation, number, title and credits align with existing course(s)? Please indicate equivalent course/campus http://mus.edu/transfer/CCN/ccn_default.asp Exact entry to appear in the next catalog (Specify course abbreviation, level, number, title, credits, repeatability (if applicable), frequency of offering, prerequisites, and a brief description.) Offered every fall. Graduate level, or consent of instructor for advanced undergraduates. Teach principles and philosophy of conducting strong inference science. Practical application to student’s own thesis research. Justification: How does the course fit with the existing curriculum? Why is it needed? The course provides a graduate student education component that advances rigor of thesis research that is not provided in other courses. Are there curricular adjustments to accommodate teaching this course? No. Complete for UG courses. (UG courses should be assigned a 400 number). Describe graduate increment (Reference guidelines: http://www.umt.edu/facultysenate/Grad/UG.htm) Fees may be requested only for courses meeting specific conditions determined by the Board of Regents. Please indicate whether this course will be considered for a fee. If YES, what is the proposed amount of the fee? Justification: IV. To Delete or Change an Existing Course – check X all that apply Deletion Title Course Number Change From: Level U, UG, G To: Description Change Repeatability YES From: To: NO X Change in Credits From: To: Prerequisites 1. Current course information at it appears in catalog (http://www.umt.edu/catalog) Cross Listing (primary program initiates form) Is there a fee associated with the course? 2. Full and exact entry (as proposed) 3. If cross-listed course: secondary program & course number 4. Is this a course with MUS Common Course Numbering? If yes, then will this change eliminate the course’s common course status? Please explain below. 5. Graduate increment if level of course is changed to UG. Reference guidelines at: http://www.umt.edu/facultysenate/Grad/UG.htm (syllabus required in section V) Have you reviewed the graduate increment guidelines? Please check (X) space provided. 6. Other programs affected by the change 7. Justification for proposed change V. Syllabus/Assessment Information Required for new courses and course change from U to UG. Paste syllabus in field below or attach and send digital copy with form. See attached. VI Department Summary (Required if several forms are submitted) In a separate document list course number, title, and proposed change for all proposals. VII Copies and Electronic Submission. After approval, submit original, one copy, summary of proposals and electronic file to the Faculty Senate Office, UH 221, camie.foos@mso.umt.edu. Revised 11-2009 Conducting Strong Inference Science WBIO Fall 2010 Instructors: Thomas E Martin Natural Sciences 205; phone 243-4393; email: tom.martin@umontana.edu Office Hours: MF 9 – 10:00; 1-3:00 Objectives: The purpose of this course is to teach graduate students in natural resources and biological sciences to: 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Understand strong inference and hypothetico-deductive approaches to science. Induction vs deduction; statistical vs research hypotheses How to construct/develop alternative hypotheses and the predictions for falsifying them. Elucidate and make explicit assumptions and how to treat them. Learn how to identify and espouse major gaps in knowledge. Give presentations that incorporate these principles. Learn to evaluate and provide feedback on these principles for presentations. References: Platt, J.R. 1964. Strong inference. Science. 146:347-353. Popper, K. R. (1982), Realism and the Aim of Science, Hutchinson, London. Course Grades will be based on the following proportions: Active participation in discussion Presentations 0.50 0.50 University policies on drops, adds, changes of grade option, or change to audit status will be strictly enforced in this course. These policies are described on page 21 of the 2007-2008 Catalog. Students should specifically note that after the 30th day of the semester, such changes are NOT automatically approved. They may be requested by petition, but the petition MUST be accompanied by documentation of extenuating circumstances. Requests to drop a course or change the grade basis to benefit a student's grade point average will not be approved. All students must practice academic honesty. Academic misconduct is subject to an academic penalty by the course instructor and/or a disciplinary sanction by the University. All students should be familiar with the Student Conduct Code. The Code is available for review online. DATE SCHEDULED TOPIC 6 September Introduction to basic ideas and structure of the course 13 September Strong inference and hypothesis testing, predictions 20 September Deductive/inductive approaches, stating assumptions, developing gap in knowledge – example presentation on offspring size 27 September 5 min presentations of each student: integrating all principles above and critiques by other students – learning how to critique/interact 4 October Continued 5 min presentations and critiques 11 October Barton – full presentation and critique 18 October Heers – full presentation 25 October Crandell – full presentation 1 November Johnson – full presentation 8 November Majewska – full presentation 15 November Ton – full presentation 22 November Me – new full example presentation 29 November Boyce – full presentation 6 December Full presentation