Course: Accelerated Engineering Calculus I Instructor: Michael Medvinsky 9 Limits Involving Infinity ∞ (2.5) Consider following limit: lim x →0 1 . The graph and table (use x2 15 convenient values like f (10− n ) = 102 n ) suggests that there’s no 10 number that the function reach as x approach 0. However one can see that the closer x to the zero (from either side) the 5 0 -5 -4 larger values the function takes. We’ll denote such situation as lim x →0 -3 -1 -2 0 2 1 3 4 5 1 = ∞ . The x2 symbol ∞ doesn’t represent a number, but express a particular sort of non-existing limit. Def: The line x=a called a vertical asymptote of the curve y=f(x) if at least one of the following statements is true: lim = ∞, lim = ∞, lim = −∞, lim = −∞ x→a± Ex 1. Ex 2. Ex 3. x→a x→a± x→a lim ln x = −∞ x →0 lim tan x = ∞ x →π /2− lim+ x →−1 x −1 x −1 1 cos 2 x = lim+ cos 2 x = lim cos 2 x = ∞ near x=-1 2 x →−1 x + 1+ x →−1 ( x + 1)( x − 1) x −1 , cos 2 x < 1 therefore cos 2 x 1 ≤ → ∞ . Another reason inf*bounded function. x +1 x +1 Def: Let f(x) be defined on ( a, ∞ ) , then lim f ( x ) = L means that f(x) gets close to L as x →±∞ x (or –x) gets sufficiently large. We denote the line y=L as horizontal asymptote to y=f(x). 2 1.5 1 Ex 4. y= e − x ⇒ lim y = 0 Ex 5. y= arctan x ⇒ lim y= π / 2 Ex 6. y =1/ x ⇒ lim y =0 Ex 7. a) Let f ( x) = 0.5 x →∞ 0 x →∞ n x →±∞ -0.5 -1 -1.5 -2 -20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15 20 x x∈ , lim f ( x ) = NA, lim f ( n ) = ∞, lim f ( n / π ) = 1 n →∞ n →∞ 1 x ∈ \ x →∞ 1 x ∈ b) Let g ( x) = x 2 x∈ \ , again lim g ( x ) = NA , but lim f ( x ) g ( x ) = ∞ , not that x →∞ x →∞ neither f(x) or g(x) tends to infinite, but their multiplication does. Ex 8. lim x sin x = ∞ since sin x ≤ 1 ⇒ x= sin x x sin x ≤ x → ∞ x →∞ Course: Accelerated Engineering Calculus I Instructor: Michael Medvinsky 9.1 The arithmetic of Infinite Limits 1. Consider that lim f ( x) = x→a ∞ and lim g ( x ) = ∞ x→a and, then the following is true: lim ( f ( x ) + g ( x ) ) = ∞ x→a but lim ( f ( x ) − g ( x ) ) = ??? need more work x→a lim f ( x ) g ( x ) = ∞ x→a lim f ( x ) x→a but lim x→a g( x) = ∞ f ( x) = ??? need more work g ( x) lim ( ± p ) f ( x ) = ±∞, p > 0 x→a lim ( f ( x ) ) = ∞, q > 0 q x→a 2. Consider that lim f ( x) = x→a ∞ and lim h ( x ) = ± L, L > 0 , ∞ and lim h ( x ) = 0 x→a true: lim ( f ( x ) + h ( x ) ) = ∞ x→a lim f ( x ) h ( x ) = ±∞ x→a 3. Consider that lim f ( x) = x→a lim f ( x ) h ( x ) = ??? need more work x→a lim f ( x ) x→a but lim x→a h ( x ) = ??? need more work f ( x) = ??? need more work h ( x ) x→a then then the following is