course evaluations
University of Utah
Course and Instructor Evaluation Report
Spring 2005
College/School:
College of Science
Instructor:
ZHANG,DALI;
Subject:
Mathematics
Accel Eng Calc II
Course:
Print Date: 03-Nov-05
Course #:
1280 - 001
8
Evaluations processed: 5
Enrollment:
UU Standard Demographic
Items
1. Class Standing:
High
School
4 0.0%
N
2. Number of credit hours I am
N
completing this semester:
5
3. Number of hours I work for
N
pay each week:
5
4. Approximate number of
hours per week I spent
N
studying/preparing for this
class:
5
5. Percentage of course
meetings (class, lab) I
N
attended:
5
Freshman
Sophomore Junior
Senior Graduate
75.0%
0.0%
0.0%
25.0%
1-4
5-8
9-12
13-16
17+
0.0%
I do not
work
40.0%
0.0%
20.0%
60.0%
Fewer than 10
10 to 20
21 to 30
20.0%
20.0%
0.0%
20.0%
31 to
39
0.0%
0.0%
40+
20.0%
0
1-2
3-4
5-6
7-8
9-10
0.0%
40.0%
20.0%
40.0%
0.0%
0.0%
less than
50%
50% - 74%
75% - 90%
greater
than 90%
0.0%
general
major/minor
N
education/graduation
requirement
requirement
5 100.0%
0.0%
0.0%
80.0%
0.0%
0.0%
7. My Cumulative GPA:
N 0 - 1.99
2.0 - 2.49
2.5 - 2.99
3.0 - 3.49
8. My expected course grade:
5 0.0%
NA
5 80.0%
20.0%
B
0.0%
0.0%
C
20.0%
0.0%
D
0.0%
6. My PRIMARY reason for
taking this class:
20.0%
UU Standard Course Items
1. The course objectives were clearly stated.
2. The course objectives were met.
3. The course content was well organized.
4. The course materials were helpful in meeting course objectives.
5. Assignments and exams reflected what was covered in the course.
6. I learned a great deal in this course.
7. Overall, this was an effective course.
Composite score: 5.31 Subject composite score: 5.00
UU Standard Instructor Items Zhang,Dali
more
than
10
hours
0.0%
professional major/minor general personal
certification elective
elective interest/other
N
5
5
5
5
5
5
5
SD
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
N SD
D
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
D
MD
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
MD
0.0%
3.5 4.0
80.0%
E
0.0%
MA
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
20.0%
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
MA
0.0%
A
60.0%
80.0%
80.0%
40.0%
40.0%
60.0%
80.0%
A
SA
40.0%
20.0%
20.0%
40.0%
60.0%
40.0%
20.0%
SA
Avg
5.40
5.20
5.20
5.20
5.60
5.40
5.20
S.Avg
5.12
5.05
5.00
4.94
5.09
4.89
4.88
Avg S.Avg
1. The instructor was organized.
2. The instructor demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject.
3. The instructor presented course content effectively.
4. The instructor created/supported a classroom environment that was
respectful.
5. As appropriate, the instructor encouraged questions and opinions.
6. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
7. Overall, this was an effective instructor.
Composite score: 5.30 Subject composite score: 5.09
5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 40.0% 5.40 5.06
5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 40.0% 5.40 5.29
5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 40.0% 40.0% 20.0% 4.80 4.85
4 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 50.0% 50.0% 5.50 5.15
5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 40.0% 5.40 5.13
5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 60.0% 40.0% 5.40 5.14
5 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 80.0% 20.0% 5.20 5.00
N = number of responses
SD = Strongly Disagree (response value 1)
D = Disagree (response value 2)
MD = Mildly Disagree (response value 3)
MA = Mildly Agree (response value 4)
A = Agree (response value 5)
SA = Strongly Agree (response value 6)
S.Avg = Subject-wide Average for this question
Get Written Comments Report
DISCLAIMER: Department composite scores are current as of the date of this report, but may be revised if
additional evaluations are processed.