Total Ship Systems Engineering
Program (TSSE)
Capstone
Design Project
Naval Postgraduate School
Team 2000
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
1
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
SEA LANCE
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
2
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Technical
Evaluation
TSSE Program
Summary
Operational
Scenario
Requirements
Documents
Alternative
Architectures
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Design
Enablers
Design
Drivers
Analysis
Of
Alternatives
Measures
Of
Effectiveness
3
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Navy After Next Potential CONOPS
DISTANCE
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Phase 2
Assured
Access
Power Protection
MPF (F)
O M F T S / S T O M
Phase 0
missiles, fuel, ordnance
POWER PROTECTION FORCES CVBG /
ATF
CONUS/ALB
Delivery Boys
SEA BASE SHIPS
Merchant
Marine
Phase 1
Submersible Caches:
Phase 1/2
4
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Who We Are
!
!
!
!
TSSE Staff
"
" Prof. Charles Calvano
"
" Prof. Dave Byers
"
" Prof. Robert Harney
"
" Prof. Fotis Papoulias
"
" Prof. John Ciezki
Other NPS Staff
"
" Prof. Wayne Hughes
"
" Prof. Phil Depoy
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
!
!
2000 Design Team
"
" LT Howard Markle
"
" LT Karl Eimers
"
" LT Rick Trevisan
"
" LT Tim Barney
"
" LTjg Ahmet Altekin
"
" LT Chris Nash
"
" LCDR Garrett Farman
"
" LT Ricardo Kompatzki
5
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Technical
Evaluation
TSSE Program
Summary
Operational
Scenario
Requirements
Documents
Alternative
Architectures
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Design
Enablers
Design
Drivers
Analysis
Of
Alternatives
Measures
Of
Effectiveness
6
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Program Content
!
!
In
In addition
addition to
to other
other degree
degree requirements,
requirements, including
including
thesis,
thesis, the
the TSSE
TSSE students
students take
take the
the following
following eight
eight core
core
courses,
courses, which
which are
are “the
“the program”.
program”.
!
!
!
!
TS3000
TS3000
TS3001
TS3001
!
!
TS3002
TS3002
!
!
TS3003
TS3003
TS4000
TS4000
TS4001
TS4001
TS4002
TS4002
TS4003
TS4003
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
14 December 2000
Shipboard
Shipboard Electrical
Electrical Power
Power Systems
Systems
Fundamental
Fundamental Principles
Principles of
of Naval
Naval
Architecture
Architecture
Principles
Principles of
of Ship
Ship Design
Design and
and Systems
Systems
Engineering
Engineering
Naval
Naval Combat
Combat Systems
Systems Elements
Elements
Naval
Naval Combat
Combat Systems
Systems Engineering
Engineering
Design
Design of
of Naval
Naval Engineering
Engineering Systems
Systems
Ship
Ship Systems
Systems Integration
Integration
Total
Total Ship
Ship Systems
Systems Engineering
Engineering
Sea Lance
7
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Design Project History
TEAM
TEAM
!
! AY92
AY92
!
! AY93
AY93
!
!
!
!
AY94
AY94
!
! AY95
AY95
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
AY96
AY96
AY97
AY97
AY98
AY98
AY99
AY99
AY00
AY00
DESIGN
DESIGN PROJECT
PROJECT
Regional
Regional Deterrence
Deterrence Ship
Ship
Large
Large Missile
Missile Carrier
Carrier
(“Arsenal”
(“Arsenal” Ship)
Ship)
Littoral
Littoral Warfare
Warfare “Mother
“Mother Ship”
Ship”
Combined
Combined (USN/USCG)
(USN/USCG)
Patrol
Patrol Corvette
Corvette
Arsenal
Arsenal Ship
Ship
S-CVX
S-CVX
MPF
MPF Ships
Ships for
for 2010
2010
Surf.
Surf. Warfare
Warfare Test
Test Ship
Ship
Small
Small Fast
Fast Networked
Networked combatant
combatant
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
TEAM
TEAM COMPOSITION
COMPOSITION
44 USN
USN
55 USN
USN
66 USN
USN
55 USN,
USN, 33 USCG
USCG
10
10 USN,
USN, 44 USCG,
USCG, 11 USMC
USMC
66 USN,
USN, 11 CIV
CIV
66 USN
USN
44 USN,
USN, 11 Hellenic
Hellenic Navy
Navy
66 USN,
USN, 11 Chilean,
Chilean, 11 Turkish
Turkish
8
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Sea Lance
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
9
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
TSSE Knowledge Scheme
TS4002,4003
TS3000,
3001, 3003
Capstone Design Project
Realistic, Team-based Application
TS3002, 4000,
4001
TSSE Courses
Systems Engineering Principles and Process
Integration Processes and Techniques
MS Degree (ME/Physics/ECE) — Foundation
Engineering Understanding of Major Elements
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
10
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Technical
Evaluation
TSSE Program
Summary
Operational
Scenario
Requirements
Documents
Alternative
Architectures
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Design
Enablers
Design
Drivers
Analysis
Of
Alternatives
Measures
Of
Effectiveness
11
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
SEA LANCE
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Seaborne
Expeditionary
Assets for
Littoral
Access
Necessary in
Contested
Environments
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
12
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Expeditionary Grid Gaming
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
13
Team 2000
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Sea Surface Units
Floating Weapons Buoy Canisters - Strike 2
TLAM:
Primary Function: Long-range subsonic cruise missile for
attacking land targets.
Contractor: Hughes Missile Systems Co., Tucson, Ariz.
Power Plant: Cruise turbo-fan engine; solid-fuel booster
Antenna: Array of 6 dipoles @ 150 Mhz VHF
Length: 18 feet 3 inches (5.56 meters); with booster: 20 feet 6
inches (6.25 meters)
Height of 6 meters
Weight: 2,650 pounds (1192.5 kg); 3,200 pounds (1440 kg) with
booster, 3800 pounds in capsule
Diameter of 6 to 12 inches
CM Radar Picket
Diameter: 20.4 inches (51.81 cm)
This section 4 to 6 meters
Wing Span: 8 feet 9 inches (2.67 meters)
20ft
Range: Land attack, conventional warhead: 600 nautical miles
(690 statute miles, 1104 km)
Water
Surface
Speed: Subsonic - about 550 mph (880 km/h)
Guidance System: Inertial, TERCOM, and GPS
Antenna covers 360° (omni-azimuth). Therefore, no angle info from a single sensor.
Warheads: Conventional: 1,000 pounds Bullpup, or
Conventional submunitions dispenser with combined effect
bomblets, or WDU-36 warhead w/ PBXN-107 explosive & FMU148 fuze
Plays as: Regular Thawk with characteristics
noted above; launched from standalone capsule
vice platform.
Electronics
However, range and Doppler info on a target can be ascertained through an appropriate
spacing of multiple sensors in a barrier configuration. The normal spacing between
sensors would be 2 km, resulting in 1.5 sensors per kilometer of barrier length.
Barrier Geometry
21”
!
Ref: FAS Web Site
Unit Cell
!
2 km
!
!
!
!
3 sensors
99-NUWC/0594U.M4
0160-MS
!
!
!
!
!
2 km !
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Ref: MITRE (R. Evans)
Anchor Chain
99-NUWC/0594U.M2
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
0160-BL
14
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
1
Heavyweight Torpedo Batteries
Primary Function ASW and ASUW Heavyweight torpedo for
submarines
Power Plant Liquid (Otto) monopropellant fueled swash plate
engine with pumpjet propulsor.
Length 19 feet (5.79 meters)
Weight 3,695 lbs (1662.75 kg) (MK-48 ADCAP)
Diameter 21 inches (53.34 centimeters)
Range Officially "Greater than 5 miles (8 km)"
Claimed
40 kt
55 kt
MK-48 ADCAP
54,685 yd 42,530 yd
Weapon acquisition range 1600 yards
Speed Officially "Greater than 28 knots (32.2
mph, 51.52 kph)"
Reportedly - 40 - 55 kt.
Actual 55 knots
Depth Officially "Greater than 1,200 ft
(365.76 meters)"
Reportedly 3,000 ft
Guidance System Wire guided and passive/active
acoustic homing
Warhead 650 lbs (292.5 kg) high explosive
TAMDA/LFAS Sources
Surface Buoy
Assumed: 4 ADCAP-like units per launcher.
Size of total package: 4ft x 4 ft x 20 ft;
20,000 lbs (See Bunker Estimation Technique,
previous slide).
Probe Pulse
Tactical
Acoutics
Measurement
and Decision
Aid (TAMDA)
Note: These units are assumed to be able to
communicate directly with undersea sensor nets
(IUSS, ADS, and DADS).
Plays as: Torpedo Launch from point in space, vice
submarine or surface platform.
Ref: FAS Web Site
99-NUWC/0594U.M6
TAMDA (surface, roughly sonobuoy size) provides, via
a combination of probes, acoustic projections, and
receivers acoustic environmental information on Bottom
Reflection Loss, Reverberation, Bottom Depth, Bottom
Type, Bottom Scattering Strength, sound velocity profile
and ambient noise monitoring.
BT Sensor
0160-JR
Float
Transceiver
Elements
TAMDA or a similar environmental monitoring system
will be necessary to plan and place bottom acoustic
sensors effectively in the real world. An active source
LF Xmitter will also be necessary to mount an effective acoustic
ASW campaign against modern SSs.
Anchor
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
LFAS (bottom, roughly 21” dia and 10 ft long in
capsule), acting in conjunction with other receiver
sources or LFAS units, can act as an illuminator and
receiver for multi-static targeting. It can also provide
limited insitu environmental data, particularly direct
measurement of propagation loss.
For Loop 3; TAMDA is assumed to be employed as a
data-gathering device prior to the planning and placement
of any acoustic fields. LFAS is presumed to be placed
with each 100x100nmi DADS array, four to a field.
15
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Notional Adversary
!
!
!
!
!
Population 5 times U.S.
GDP Comparable to U.S.
Defense Budget ½ of U.S.
Coast Line over ½ of it’s borders
Continental shelves extend to a maximum
of 100 km offshore
Weapon Totals
AAW:
ASUW (Large):
ASUW (Small):
ASW:
STRIKE (Long):
STRIKE (Short):
Carried
3,000
340
1,000
160
300
700
Required
3,000
400
1,000
100
300
700
NOTE: The 60 extra ASW weapons were applied to the
ASUW (large) weapons requirement.
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
16
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Weight and Volume
!
!
!
170,000 ft33
6,000 LT
??????
Total Volume
Total Weight
Total Cost
CNAN Distributed Grid and Craft Payload
CM Radar Picket
DADS
TAMDA
LFAS
UC V Small
RSTA
IR SAM
Air Mines
Tomahawk
SubBAT
FSAM
SM-3/TBMD
NTACM
TORP BATT
H RPOON
Number
Elements
1337
4160
20
20
15
12
2000
800
300
500
500
1000
700
40
340
Total Volume
Total Weight
(ft^3/element)
(Tons/element)
23,610
1,602
8
480
525
4,944
53,000
3,601
13,959
1,200
625
19,360
21,889
12,783
10,540
668
208
1
18
4
148
400
200
570
48
37
2,000
1,575
399
432
168,126
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Total ft^3
5,989
Total LT
17
Team 2000
Total Ship Systems Engineering
CNAN Geography
90,000 ft
Land
Land Littoral
Littoral
200
200 Nm
Nm
Cul de sac
< 400 Nm deep
Refueling
Refueling Ops.
Ops.
600
600 Nm
Nm
Access
Access Assurance
Assurance
500
500 Nm
Nm
Forward
Forward Base
Base
1000
1000 Nm
Nm
1000
1000 ft
ft
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Trip Wire
800 Nm long
Grid packages
(total of 5)
100Nm X 100Nm
18
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Notional Adversary
!
!
!
!
!
Population 5 times U.S.
GDP Comparable to U.S.
Defense Budget ½ of U.S.
Coast Line over ½ of it’s borders
Continental shelves extend to a maximum
of 100 km offshore
Weapon Totals
AAW:
ASUW (Large):
ASUW (Small):
ASW:
STRIKE (Long):
STRIKE (Short):
Carried
3,000
340
1,000
160
300
700
Required
3,000
400
1,000
100
300
700
NOTE: The 60 extra ASW weapons were applied to the
ASUW (large) weapons requirement.
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
19
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Tripwire Architecture
800 Nm
long
Tripwire
Tripwire
Sensor
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
20
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Grid Architecture
100 Nm
100 Nm
Grid packages
Sensor
Weapon
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
21
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Technical
Evaluation
TSSE Program
Summary
Operational
Scenario
Requirements
Documents
Alternative
Architectures
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Design
Enablers
Design
Drivers
Analysis
Of
Alternatives
Measures
Of
Effectiveness
22
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Combatant and GDM
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
23
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Required Operational
Capabilities (ROC)
Sea Lance
Grid
Operations
Independent
Operations
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Special
Operations
Escort
Operations
Network
Centric
Warfare
24
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Required Operational Capabilities
Sea Lance
Grid
Operations
Independent
Operations
Special
Operations
Escort
Operations
Network
Centric
Warfare
Space
Very High Altitude “Safe Zone”
(> 90kft)
High Altitude
90,000ft
Medium Altitude
Inland Littoral
(~400 Km)
Seaward Littoral
(~1000 Km)
40,000ft
“Coastal Zone”
<<“Inland”
Beach
150ft
Surf Zone
120ft
Underground
Weapon
Canister
Floating
Sensor
UAV
USV
Ground
Sensor
Botto m
Sensor
Undersea Comms
14 December 2000
Low Altitude
1200ft
1000ft
Botto m
Master Node
Aerial Comms
Sea Lance
Very Low Altitude
Surface
Near-Surface Depth
Deep Depth
UUV
Crawler
Bottom
25
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Required Operational Capabilities
Sea Lance
Grid
Operations
Independent
Operations
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Special
Operations
Escort
Operations
Network
Centric
Warfare
26
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Required Operational Capabilities
Sea Lance
Grid
Operations
Independent
Operations
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Special
Operations
Escort
Operations
Network
Centric
Warfare
27
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Required Operational Capabilities
Sea Lance
Grid
Operations
Independent
Operations
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Special
Operations
Escort
Operations
Network
Centric
Warfare
28
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Required Operational Capabilities
Sea Lance
Grid
Operations
Independent
Operations
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Special
Operations
Escort
Operations
Network
Centric
Warfare
29
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Required Operational Capabilities
Sea Lance
Grid
Operations
Deploy
Grid
Independent
Operations
Monitor
Grid
14 December 2000
Protect
Grid
Sea Lance
Special
Operations
Escort
Operations
Network
Centric
Warfare
Control
Grid
30
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Required Operational Capabilities
Sea Lance
Grid
Operations
Indep. Ops
Deploy
Grid
Monitor
Grid
Deploy
Sensor
Grid
Deploy
Weapons
Grid
14 December 2000
Protect
Grid
Deploy
Tripwire
Sea Lance
Spec Ops
Escort Ops
NCW
Control
Grid
Deploy
Weapons and
Sensor Grid
31
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Functional Groupings
!
!
Similarities throughout branches of the
capabilities breakdown
Created Functional Groupings
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
32
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Functional Groupings
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Combatant
Maximum Speed 38 knots
Range 3000 Nm at 13 knots
Max crew size of 20
Under $100 Million dollars
Max displacement 1000 LT
Transit in sea state 6,
deployment in sea state 4
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Sea Lance/Grid System
Anti-ship missile defense
Area air defense
Interoperable with any
Joint/Combined Task Force
Operate in mined waters
Perform precision strike
33
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Technical
Evaluation
TSSE Program
Operational
Scenario
Summary
Requirements
Documents
Alternative
Architectures
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Design
Enablers
Design
Drivers
Analysis
Of
Alternatives
Measures
Of
Effectiveness
34
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Alternative Architectures
!
Medium Combatant (450 LT)
with Tow (450 LT)
!
All Medium Combatants (600 LT)
!
A Mixture of Medium (800 LT)
and Small (250 LT) Combatants
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
35
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Technical
Evaluation
TSSE Program
Summary
Operational
Scenario
Requirements
Documents
Alternative
Architectures
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Design
Enablers
Design
Drivers
Analysis
Of
Alternatives
Measures
Of
Effectiveness
36
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Measures Of
Effectiveness/Performance
Flexibility
Versatility
Analysis of
Alternatives
Lethality
Survivability
Deployability
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
37
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
!
!
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Range
Speed
Grid Deployment Order
Payload Capacity
Sea Keeping
Organic Sensor Capacity
Cost
a. Total Fuel Consumed
b. Number of personnel at risk
c. Procurement
d. Maintenance/Upkeep
8. Multiple Mission Capability
9. Modularity
10. Craft Organic Weapons
11. Weapons Load Out
12. Stealth
13. Suceptability
a. Speed
b. Stealth
c. Point Defense
14. Vulnerability
a. Armor
b. Redundancy
c. Egress Capability
d. Arrangement of Equipment/Spaces
15. Endurance
16. Habitability
17. Logistic Support
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
X
Deployability
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Survivability
Determine Factors
which affect each
MOE/MOP
Recurring Factors
"
" Cost
"
" Organic Weapon
& Sensor
Capability
"
" Seakeeping
"
" Speed
Lethality
!
!
Versatility
Measures Of Effectiveness/Performance
Flexibility
Measures Of
Effectiveness/Performance
X
X
X
X
X
X
38
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Technical
Evaluation
TSSE Program
Summary
Operational
Scenario
Requirements
Documents
Alternative
Architectures
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Design
Enablers
Design
Drivers
Analysis
Of
Alternatives
Measures
Of
Effectiveness
39
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Cost Analysis
!
!
Doubling displacement increases cost by a factor of 1.5
Cost = (1.8066 ) ( Displacement 0.585 )
800 LT Option = (1.8066)(8000.585 ) = $90,192,000 ≈ $90 Million
600 LT Option = (1.8066)(6000.585 ) = $76,222,000 ≈ $76 Million
450 LT Option = (1.8066)(4500.585 ) = $64,416,000 ≈ $64 Million
250 LT Option = (1.8066)(2500.585 ) = $45,672,000 ≈ $46 Million
Option I (450 LT with 450 LT Tow):
50 Craft (400 LT)
50 GDM (400 LT)
$4.17 Billion
Option II (600 LT):
60 Craft
$4.57 Billion
Option III (250 LT and 800 LT):
45 Craft (250 LT)
45 Craft (800 LT)
$6.11 Billion
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
40
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Cost Analysis
!
!
Equalize option costs based on most expensive
option
Option I (450 LT Combatant):
$64 Million per craft
Additional $1.94 Billion
30 Additional Craft
Option II (600 LT):
$76 Million per craft
Additional $1.54 Billion
20 Additional Craft
Option III (250 LT and 800 LT): Additional $0 Billion
0 Additional Craft
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
41
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Analysis of Alternatives
250 LT and 800 LT
Advantages
Disadvantages
Fighter and Freighter
Combatant Capabilities
Plenty of Volume/Weight
800 LT Utility
No Tow Speed Limitations
800 LT Liability
Relative Stealth
Expensive
Deployability Survivability Lethality
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Versatility Flexibility
42
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Analysis of Alternatives
450 LT with 450 LT Tow
Advantages
Disadvantages
Good Payload Fraction
High risk
Plenty of Volume
Combatant/Tow Motions
Genuine Combatant
Reduced Speed
Increased Range
Commonality of Hull Forms
Deployability Survivability Lethality
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Versatility Flexibility
43
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Analysis of Alternatives
600 LT
Advantages
Disadvantages
Only one Hull Design
Limited after Deployment
No Tow Speed Restriction
Weight/Volume Limitations
Smaller RCS than 800LT
Fighter and Freighter
Relative Stealth
Expensive
Deployability Survivability Lethality
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Versatility Flexibility
44
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Analysis of Alternatives
Catamaran
Advantages
Disadvantages
Proven Technology
Higher risk
Stability/Deployability
Weight Limitations
High Speed Performance
Accelerations
Increased Volume/Deck Area
Stealth Attributes
Deployability Survivability Lethality
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Versatility Flexibility
45
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Analysis of Alternatives
Diesels
Vs.
Water Jets
14 December 2000
Vs.
Sea Lance
Gas Turbine
Propellers
46
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Technical
Evaluation
TSSE Program
Summary
Operational
Scenario
Requirements
Documents
Alternative
Architectures
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Design
Enablers
Design
Drivers
Analysis
Of
Alternatives
Measures
Of
Effectiveness
47
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Matching Enablers to Drivers
Design
Drivers
Capability
Requirements
Weight &
Functionally
VolumeDrivers
of Grid
Group
Ship
Weight
the
Endurance
Drivers
Draft
Review Driver
ETC.
Interactions
14 December 2000
Functionally
Sea Lance
Group the
Enablers
Catamaran
Map Drivers
Tow
To Enablers
Provide
Access
Assurance ...
Grid Ops
Deploy
Grid
Monitor
Grid
Sea Lance
Protect
Grid
Design
Enablers
Control
Grid
Evaluate
ETC.
Results
48
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Technical
Evaluation
TSSE Program
Summary
Operational
Scenario
Requirements
Documents
Alternative
Architectures
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Design
Enablers
Design
Drivers
Analysis
Of
Alternatives
Measures
Of
Effectiveness
49
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Technology to Capability
Propulsion/Electrical
Network-centric Link
SWAN
Hull type/material
Capability
Organic Weapons/Sensors
Human factors/Habitability
Expeditionary Grid Systems
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
50
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Technology to Capability
Propulsion/Electrical
Network-centric Link
SWAN
Hull type/Material
Capability
Organic Weapons/Sensors
Human factors/Habitability
Expeditionary Grid Systems
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
51
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Diesel Vs. Gas Turbine
!
!
!
!
!
!
14 December 2000
Fuel Consumption
Weight
Reduction Gear
Intakes / Exhaust
Maintenance
GT Break-through?
Sea Lance
52
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Conventional Vs. Electric Drive
# Fuel Efficiency
7% Transmission loss
"
" 5% Best Case SFC bonus
$ Weight
"
" Extra Electric Motors
"
" Larger Generators and Rectifiers
$ Cost & Risk
% Dovetail DD21
"
"
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
53
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Propulsors
!
!
!
14 December 2000
Propeller
"
" Size & Reduction Gear
"
" Performance while planing
Conventional Waterjet
"
" 15 knot efficiency
Bird-Johnson AWJ21
"
" Efficiency / Cavitation
"
" Risk
Sea Lance
54
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Bird-Johnson AWJ21
Bird-Johnson
Proprietary
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
55
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Bird-Johnson AWJ21
Patents Approved & Pending
Bird-Johnson
Proprietary
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
56
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Engine Room
Rectifier
FW Syncro
Machine
Power
Take-Off
Prime Movers
AWJ-21
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
57
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Electric Power System
!
!
!
14 December 2000
TOSA
"
" Flexibility & Upgrades
PTO Power Generation
"
" Simplicity & Weight savings
DC Zonal Distribution
"
" Simplicity & DD 21 Dovetail
Sea Lance
58
Team 2000
Total Ship Systems Engineering
DC Zonal Distribution
Propulsion
Cross Connect
Port
Prime
Mover
PTO
PTO
Step Up
Gear
DC-DC
DC-AC Buffer
Inverter
Inport/
Emergency
Genset
DC-AC
DC-DC Inverter
Buffer
Propulsion
14 December 2000
FW
SM
Starboard
Prime
Mover
PTO
Step Up
Gear
Sea Lance
DC
DC
AC
AC
Rectifier
DC-DC
DC-AC Buffer
Inverter
DC-AC
DC-DC Inverter
Buffer
FW
SM
Rectifier
59
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Technology to Capability
Propulsion/Electrical
Network-centric Link
SWAN
Hull type/material
Capability
Organic Weapons/Sensors
Human factors/Habitability
Expeditionary Grid Systems
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
60
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Sea Lance C4ISR
!
!
!
14 December 2000
Grid “Teamnet”
Notional Idea
"
" Acoustic Modems
"
" RF Gateways
Exterior Net
"
" Tadil J/Link 16
Sea Lance
61
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Sea Lance C4ISR
!
Combatant Comms
"
" Ship to Ship/Air
VHF
&
& UHF
&
&
"
"
Satellite
EHF (MILSTAR)
&
& Global Broadcast System
&
&
"
"
Data Links
Teamnet
&
& Tadil J/Link 16
&
&
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
62
Team 2000
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Combatant Onboard Network
Network
Hub
Hub
Network
User
Hub
Hub
User
Hub
14 December 2000
User
Sea Lance
User
Hub
User
User
Hub
User
User
User
Hub
Hub
User
User
User
Hub
User
Hub
User
Hub
63
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Combatant Onboard Network
!
!
Fast Ethernet Mesh LAN
"
" Reliable & Inexpensive
Functional Separation
"
" Flexibility & Up-gradable
Total Integration
LPD 17
C4I
Engineering
C4I
SWAN
Combat Systems
!
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
"
Operational systems
Engineering control & sensing
Combat Systems
Administrative
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Administration
DD 21
64
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Combatant Onboard Network
CO/TAO Console
Console
Console
Console
Antennas
Xcvr
Training System
Fast Ethernet
Backbone
Comms Computer
Crypto
Entertainment System
Combat Systems
Computer
Auxiliary Systems
Weapon Systems
Engineering Control
Computer
Sensor Systems
DC System
Propulsion System
Electrical System
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Nav System
65
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Control Spaces
!
!
14 December 2000
Control Center/Bridge
"
" All watchstanding
Engineering Station
"
" Maintenance/Diagnostic Station
Sea Lance
66
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Control Center/Bridge
OOD
CO/TAO
CO/TAO
OOD
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
67
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Engineering Station
!
!
!
!
!
!
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
One per Engine Room
Battery back-up &
Alternate data paths
for “no power” ops.
Maintenance only (not
manned)
68
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Technology to Capability
Propulsion/Electrical
Network-centric Link
SWAN
Hull type/material
Capability
Organic Weapons/Sensors
Human factors/Habitability
Expeditionary Grid Systems
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
69
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Combatant/GDM
Characteristics
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
Combatant
Wave-Piercing
Catamaran
Full Load Disp.: 450 LT
Light Ship Disp.: 283 LT
LCB/LCG: 16’ aft CL
VCG: 10’ above keel
Submerged Length: 158’
Length at Waterline: 146’
Length Overall: 167’
CBB : 0.625
CPP : 0.857 CXX : 0.729
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
GDM
Wave-Piercing
Catamaran
Full Load Disp.: 450 LT
Light Ship Disp.: 146 LT
Other characteristics
similar to combatant
70
Team 2000
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Table of Offsets/Body Plan
Sea Lance Table of Offsets for B=10' T=8'
Water Line (feet)
Station
0
7.9
15.8
23.7
31.6
39.5
47.4
55.3
63.2
71.1
79
86.9
94.8
102.7
110.6
118.5
126.4
134.3
142.2
150.1
158
0
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
1.6
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
16
15.69
15.24
14.74
14.28
14.14
13.52
13.13
12.40
12.40
12.40
12.40
12.75
12.75
16
16
14 December 2000
3.2
16
16
16
16
16
16
16.27
16.30
16.31
19.12
19.71
19.71
19.71
19.71
19.71
19.71
19.71
19.71
19.71
16
16
16
15.52
15.52
15.23
14.48
13.90
13.43
13.05
12.37
12.12
11.13
10.78
10.78
10.78
10.78
10.78
10.78
10.78
10.78
10.78
10.78
4.8
16
16.33
16.33
16.68
17.37
18.07
18.53
18.71
18.90
19.28
20.81
20.87
20.87
20.87
20.87
20.87
20.87
20.87
20.87
20.87
20.87
Sea Lance
16
15.52
14.59
13.96
12.74
12.04
11.81
11.47
11.02
10.80
10.90
10.66
10.66
10.66
10.66
10.66
10.66
10.66
10.66
10.66
10.66
6.4
16
16.39
17.32
17.95
19.11
19.92
20.16
20.21
20.29
20.31
20.76
20.76
20.76
20.76
20.76
20.76
20.76
20.76
20.76
20.76
20.76
16
15.06
13.96
13.43
12.74
12.16
11.81
11.47
11.02
10.80
10.66
10.43
10.43
10.43
10.43
10.43
10.43
10.43
10.43
10.43
10.43
8
16
16.85
18.01
18.53
19.23
19.81
20.11
20.16
20.23
20.25
20.64
20.64
20.64
20.64
20.64
20.64
20.64
20.64
20.64
20.64
20.64
16
15.52
14.59
13.67
12.97
12.28
11.81
11.47
10.91
10.69
10.49
10.32
10.32
10.32
10.32
10.32
10.32
10.32
10.32
10.32
10.32
16
16.45
17.37
18.19
19.00
19.69
20.06
20.11
20.18
20.20
20.52
20.52
20.52
20.52
20.52
20.52
20.52
20.52
20.52
20.52
20.52
71
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Motions Summary
!
Vertical Accelerations are an issue
"
" Above NAVSEA requirements
Utilize wave piercing catamaran
Utilize ride stabilization system
Anticipate results similar to other
commercial designs
Other vertical and lateral motions are
within reasonable limits
&
&
&
&
&
&
!
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
72
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Bridge Accelerations
Accelerations at the Bridge
Acceleration (g's)
1.40
1.20
1.00
0.80
0.60
0.40
0.20
0.00
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Wave/Ship Length
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
73
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Stress/Structures Summary
!
!
Hogging and Sagging conditions computed to
determine the maximum longitudinal and
transverse bending stress
"
" Aluminum (5086-H34) used for the majority of
design
"
" Composites used in the central control station
and the mast
"
" Steel used for reinforcement where necessary
"
" Hull structural weight validation performed
against similar catamaran ferry designs
&
& 125 LT structure vice 128 LT
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
74
Team 2000
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Longitudinal Weight Dist.
Longitudinal Weight Distribution
45.0
40.0
35.0
Weight (LT)
30.0
25.0
20.0
15.0
10.0
5.0
15
8
15
0
14
2
13
4
12
6
11
9
11
1
10
3
95
87
79
71
63
55
47
40
32
24
16
8
0
0.0
Length from Bow (ft)
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
75
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Floodable Length
Comparment Center vs. Floodable Length
with Draft = 8 ft, VCG = 10.59 ft, Permeability = 0.95
and Margin set at 3 inches below Main Deck (14 ft)
100
90
80
Floodable Length (ft)
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
Compartment Center (ft)
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
76
Team 2000
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Stability Assessment
Righting Arm vs. Heel Angle
for Displacement = 450 LT, VCG = 10.59 ft and
Trim = 0
14
Righting Arm (ft)
12
10
8
6
4
2
0
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Heel Angle (degrees)
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
77
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Combatant Weight
Breakdown
SWBS
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
Description
SHELL + SUPPORTS
HULL STRUCTURAL BULKHEADS
HULL DECKS
HULL PLATFORMS/FLATS
DECK HOUSE STRUCTURE
SPECIAL STRUCTURES
MASTS+KINGPOSTS+SERV PLATFORM
FOUNDATIONS
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
Weight
64.1
20.0
12.0
3.2
2.4
4.0
3.0
1.0
15.0
124.8
230
240
250
260
290
PROPULSION UNITS
TRANSMISSION+PROPULSOR SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SYSTEMS
PROPUL SUP SYS - FUEL, LUBE OIL
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
50.8
8.0
1.3
1.0
1.0
62.1
310
320
330
340
390
ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION
POWER DISTRIBUTION SYS
LIGHTING SYSTEMS
POWER GENERATION SUPPORT SYS
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
4.5
3.0
1.0
0.5
2.0
11.0
410
420
430
440
450
460
470
480
490
COMMAND+CONTROL SYSTEMS
NAVIGATION SYSTEMS
INTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS
EXTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS
SURF SURV SYS (RADAR)
UNDERWATER SURV SYS
COUNTERMEASURES
FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
3.0
0.1
0.1
1.5
0.7
0.3
0.1
2.8
1.2
9.8
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
SWBS
510
520
530
540
550
560
570
580
590
Description
CLIMATE CONTROL
SEA WATER SYSTEMS
FRESH WATER SYSTEMS
FUEL/LUBRICANTS, HANDELING+STORAGE
AIR, GAS+MISC FLUID SYSTEMS
SHIP CNTL SYSTEMS
UNDERWAY REPLENISHMENT SYSTEMS
MECHANICAL HANDELING SYSTEMS
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
Weight
4.5
1.9
0.9
3.0
4.4
6.9
1.9
2.0
9.9
35.4
610
620
630
640
650
660
670
690
SHIP FITTINGS
HULL COMPARTMENTATION
PRESERVATIVES+COVERINGS
LIVING SPACES
SERVICE SPACES
WORKING SPACES
STOWAGE SPACES
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
0.7
0.2
1.8
2.2
1.5
0.3
0.4
1.5
8.6
710
720
730
740
750
760
770
780
790
GUNS+AMMUNITION
MISSLES+ROCKETS
MINES
DEPTH CHARGES
TORPEDOES
SMALL ARMS+PYROTECHNICS
CARGO MUNITIONS
AIRCRAFT RELATED WEAPONS
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
5.3
25.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
31.7
78
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Combatant Weight
Breakdown
SWBS
F10
F20
F30
F40
F50
F60
!
!
!
!
14 December 2000
Description
SHIPS FORCE+EFFECTS
MISSION RELATED EXPENDABLES+SYS
STORES
FUELS+LUBRICANTS
LIQUIDS, NON-PETRO BASED
CARGO
Full Load (LT):
Margin:
Full Load Displacement (LT):
Light Ship (LT):
Dead Weight (LT):
Payload Fraction:
Design Margin
Full Load Disp.
Light Ship
Payload Fraction
Sea Lance
Weight
4.7
24.7
0.8
104.0
16.1
0.0
433.6
6.5%
449.9
283.2
150.3
35%
6.5 %
449.9 LT
283.2 LT
35 %
79
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
GDM Weight Breakdown
SWBS
110
120
130
140
150
160
170
180
190
Description
SHELL + SUPPORTS
HULL STRUCTURAL BULKHEADS
HULL DECKS
HULL PLATFORMS/FLATS
DECK HOUSE STRUCTURE
SPECIAL STRUCTURES
MASTS+KINGPOSTS+SERV PLATFORM
FOUNDATIONS
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
Weight
64.1
20.0
12.0
3.2
2.4
13.0
3.0
1.0
10.0
128.8
230
240
250
260
290
PROPULSION UNITS
TRANSMISSION+PROPULSOR SYSTEMS
SUPPORT SYSTEMS
PROPUL SUP SYS - FUEL, LUBE OIL
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
310
320
330
340
390
ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION
POWER DISTRIBUTION SYS
LIGHTING SYSTEMS
POWER GENERATION SUPPORT SYS
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
1.5
1.5
1.0
0.5
1.0
5.5
410
420
430
440
450
460
470
480
490
COMMAND+CONTROL SYSTEMS
NAVIGATION SYSTEMS
INTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS
EXTERIOR COMMUNICATIONS
SURF SURV SYS (RADAR)
UNDERWATER SURV SYS
COUNTERMEASURES
FIRE CONTROL SYSTEMS
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
0.0
0.0
0.1
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
1.2
2.4
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
SWBS
510
520
530
540
550
560
570
580
590
Description
CLIMATE CONTROL
SEA WATER SYSTEMS
FRESH WATER SYSTEMS
FUEL/LUBRICANTS, HANDELING+STORAGE
AIR, GAS+MISC FLUID SYSTEMS
SHIP CNTL SYSTEMS
UNDERWAY REPLENISHMENT SYSTEMS
MECHANICAL HANDELING SYSTEMS
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
Weight
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.0
0.0
0.0
1.0
0.8
0.8
5.6
610
620
630
640
650
660
670
690
SHIP FITTINGS
HULL COMPARTMENTATION
PRESERVATIVES+COVERINGS
LIVING SPACES
SERVICE SPACES
WORKING SPACES
STOWAGE SPACES
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
0.7
0.2
1.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
4.2
710
720
730
740
750
760
770
780
790
GUNS+AMMUNITION
MISSLES+ROCKETS
MINES
DEPTH CHARGES
TORPEDOES
SMALL ARMS+PYROTECHNICS
CARGO MUNITIONS
AIRCRAFT RELATED WEAPONS
SPECIAL PURPOSE SYSTEMS
Group Total:
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
80
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
GDM Weight Breakdown
SWBS
F10
F20
F30
F40
F50
F60
!
!
!
!
Description
SHIPS FORCE+EFFECTS
MISSION RELATED EXPENDABLES+SYS
STORES
FUELS+LUBRICANTS
LIQUIDS, NON-PETRO BASED
CARGO
Full Load (LT):
Margin:
Full Load Displacement (LT):
Light Ship (LT):
Dead Weight (LT):
Payload Fraction:
Design Margin
Full Load Disp.
Light Ship
Payload Fraction
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Weight
0.0
0.5
0.0
103.0
0.0
190.0
440.0
6.5%
449.5
146.5
293.5
67%
6.5 %
449.5 LT
146.5 LT
67 %
81
Team 2000
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Cost Estimation (in 2000 $)
Total 2000 Acquisition Cost
Non-recurring Engineering Cost:
Lead Ship:
Second Ship:
Third Ship:
Fourth Ship:
Fifth Ship:
Sixth Ship:
Seventh Ship:
Eight Ship:
Ninth Ship:
Tenth Ship:
;
R
y
q
$82.9
$64.5
$64.2
$64.1
$64.0
$63.9
$63.9
$63.8
$63.8
$63.8
$63.7
”X y
R
q
$0
$19.4
$19.3
$19.2
$19.1
$19.1
$19.1
$19.0
$19.0
$19.0
$19.0
Price of First Squadron:
$914 (Delivered)
$1,090 (Deployed)
Price of Following Squadrons:
$827 (Delivered)
$1,004 (Deployed)
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
yf y” X y ;
;
X
yf y” X y
X
$82.9
$83.9
$83.5
$83.3
$83.1
$83.0
$82.9
$82.9
$82.8
$82.7
$82.7
$82.9
$101.5
$101.1
$100.9
$100.8
$100.7
$100.6
$100.5
$100.5
$100.4
$100.4
82
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Sea Lance Exterior
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
83
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Interior Spaces
Cleats
Tow Equipment
Room
Boat Deck
Decoy Launcher
Habitability
Spaces
Line Locker
Central
Control Station
51-cell SA/SS
Electronics
Space
Potable Water
Main Engine
Room
30 mm Gun
30 mm Gun
Inport/Emergency
Generator
Auxiliary Machinery
Room
Line Locker
4-Cell Harpoon/SLAM
Decoy Launcher
Chain Locker
14 December 2000
Fuel Tanks
Refueling Probe
Sea Lance
84
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Sea Lance Exterior
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
85
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Interior Spaces
RHIB
Boat/Davit
25-Person
Life Raft
Oily Waste
Holding Tanks
Gray/Black Water
Storage/Treatment
Tanks
14 December 2000
Mine Detection
Sonar/Acoustic Modem
Sea Lance
86
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Technology to Capability
Propulsion/Electrical
Network-centric Link
SWAN
Hull type/material
Capability
Organic Weapons/Sensors
Human factors/Habitability
Expeditionary Grid Systems
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
87
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Weapons and Sensor Data
W e a pon
Ra n g e
G u id a n ce
M edium Range S S M
Dual P urpos e S A M /S S M
30 m m Gun (fore)
67 nm
15 nm
2 nm
A ctive
A ctive/S em i-active/IR
S e nsor
Ra nge
Ba nd
A ir/S urfac e/M is s ile detec tion
54 nm
2-4 GHz
Fire Control (fore)
20 nm
27-40 Ghz
Fire Control (aft)
20 nm
27-40 Ghz
IRS T
20 nm
3-5 & 8-12 um
E O S uite (s tarboard)
10 nm
TV /IR 8-12 um /LRF 1.064 um
E O S uite (port)
10 nm
TV /IR 8-12 um /LRF 1.064 um
ESM
----2-18 GHz
Navigation Radar
25 nm
8-10 Ghz
M ine A voidanc e S onar
> 350 y ds
250 K Hz
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
88
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Combatant Weapons
51-cell SS/SA
4-Cell Harpoon/SLAM
30 mm Gun
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
89
Team 2000
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Enclosed Mast
TACAN
Infrared Search
and Track (IRST)
ESM Suite
(2) ElectroOptical Sensors
Phased
Array
Comms.
Antennae
Air and Surface
Search Radar
Navigation
Radar
Forward
(2) Fire Control
Radars
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
90
Team 2000
Total Ship Systems Engineering
RCS Analysis
Comparison of Average RCS
SEA LANCE TOTAL
24.7
SEA LANCE (=0)
SEA LANCE (<45 & >0)
20.7
-13.1
SEA LANCE (=45)
5.4
SEA LANCE (>45 & <90)
-1.3
SEA LANCE (=90)
SEA LANCE (>90 & <180)
24.0
-8.0
SEA LANCE (=180)
38.7
450 LT combatant
32.0
Large bomber aircraft
16.0
Large fighter aircraft
7.8
Small fighter aircraft
3.0
Small single engine aircraft
0.0
Missile
-3.0
Small open boat -17.0
-20.0
-10.0
0.0
10.0
20.0
30.0
40.0
50.0
RCS [dBsm]
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
91
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Technology to Capability
Propulsion/Electrical
Network-centric Link
SWAN
Hull type/material
Capability
Organic Weapons/Sensors
Human factors/Habitability
Expeditionary Grid Systems
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
92
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Crew
!
!
!
!
!
!
“SeaLanceman” Rate
"
" Applicants from other rates
"
" General & Specialized Training
Officers & Enlisted
"
" CO
"
" Officers (2)
"
" Enlisted (10)
Accomplished with 13 person crew
"
" Maximum use of automation technology
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
93
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Crew
!
!
!
!
!
!
Squadron
Squadron Staff
Staff
"
Commodore and
and Staff
Staff
" Commodore
Watchstanding
Watchstanding
"
TAO
" TAO
"
Ship Control/OOD
Control/OOD
" Ship
"
Assistant TAO
TAO &
& Engineer
Engineer as
as required
required
" Assistant
"
Embarked Staff
Staff
" Embarked
Ship
Ship Board
Board Operations
Operations
"
Sea &
& Anchor
Anchor
" Sea
"
UNREP
" UNREP
"
MIO
" MIO
"
SOF Insertion
Insertion
" SOF
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
94
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Habitability Spaces
Galley
Laundry
Gym
Refer/Freezer
Mess Decks
Male Head
Dry Stores
Common Sinks
Female Head
Multi-mission
Space
3-Person
Berthing
CO’s Cabin
Officer’s Stateroom
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
95
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Total Ship Information Systems
Architecture
Operations
Maintenance
Expanded
ICAS
(Integrated
Condition
Assessment
System)
Combat
Systems
Administrative
ShipWide
Supply
Area
Network
(SWAN)
Smart
Link
Equipment.
Sensors
Wireless
micro
sensors
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
96
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Maintenance
Communications Backbone
P
C
P
C
LAN
LAN
P
C
SWAN
CINCs,
TYCOMs
NAVICP,
Supply
Chain
ISEAs
P
C
LAN
LAN
Training
PC
R&D
Centers
Smart Link
LAN
Maint/Log
Managers
HQ, PEOs
LAN
OEMs
LAN
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
97
SWAN
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Technology to Capability
Propulsion/Electrical
Network-centric Link
SWAN
Hull type/material
Capability
Organic Weapons/Sensors
Human factors/Habitability
Expeditionary Grid Systems
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
98
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Grid Deployment Module
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
99
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Grid Deployment Module
Decoy Launcher
Cleats
Electronics
Space
Half Modules
Inport/Emergency
Generator
Fuel Tanks
Line Locker
Chain Locker
14 December 2000
Winch Rooms
Sea Lance
100
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Grid Component Distribution
Module
Size
Full 18' x 22' x 9'
Half 18' x 11' x 9'
14 December 2000
Item
Individual
Size
Module
Type
CM Pickett
Tomahawk
SM3
Torpedo
RSTA
Harpoon
NTACM
FSAM
LFAS
DADS
TAMDA
Air mines
UCAV small
1' x 20'
2' x 20'
2' x 21'
4' x 4' x 20'
4' x 5' x 20'
2' x 11'
2' x 11'
.5' x 10'
2' x 10'
.4' x 3'
.4' x 3'
1' x 1.5' x 3'
2.5' x 3' x 5'
Full
Full
Full
Full
Full
Half
Half
Half
Half
Half
Half
Half
Half
Sea Lance
Volume
3564
1782
Units per Weight of
module full module
128
32
32
8
6
32
32
288
32
864
864
240
30
64
60.8
64
80
73.8
40.6
72
21
32
43.2
43.2
60
7.5
101
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Notional Half Module
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
102
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Connection Force
!
Solve for
heave/pitch
amplitudes:
• Form the absolute
motion at the
connection points:
η 3 , S = µ 3, S + ν 3 , S f
ξ S = η3 , S − η 5 , S x S
η5 , S = µ 5 , S + ν 5 , S f
ξ K = η 3, K − η 5 , K x K
η3 , K = µ 3 , K + ν 3 , K f
η5 , K = µ 5 , K + ν 5 , K f
• Apply matching condition:
ξS −ξK
f =T
l
14 December 2000
f
T,l
ξS −ξK
Solve the linear equation for f
Sea Lance
103
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Tow Bar Forces
!
!
!
!
20 foot tow bar
5 knots
!
!
!
!
---- 50 tons
Tow Bar Force at 5 knots
90
---- 75 tons
60
150
---- 125 tons
20
30
150
30
---- 150 tons
10
180
0
330
210
300
180
0
330
210
240
270
14 December 2000
---- 100 tons
60
10
240
30
120
---- 100 tons
20
---- 75 tons
Tow Bar Force at 15 knots
90
30
120
20 foot tow bar
15 knots
300
270
Sea Lance
104
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Combatant and GDM
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
105
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Tow Assembly
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
106
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Tow System Findings
!
!
!
!
!
Tow length determined by geometry
Bar length used in strip theory
Maximum forces for given length dictate
thickness
Turn angle limited by moment cable
tension
Thickness is yield stress-limited to 2/3”
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
107
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Technical
Evaluation
TSSE Program
Summary
Operational
Scenario
Requirements
Documents
Alternative
Architectures
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
Design
Enablers
Design
Drivers
Analysis
Of
Alternatives
Measures
Of
Effectiveness
108
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Summary
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
In the team’s opinion, the design has fulfilled all
of the requirements set forth by the sponsor and
as specified in the requirements document.
We have completed a loop around the design
circle and in some specific instances several
iterations have been made.
The combatant could fill some essential gaps in
the current fleet and is a cheap, flexible and
capable alternative to large CRUDES ships.
The tow is a viable option which needs further
physical and computational experiments to
validate its utilization.
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
109
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Risk Assessment
!
!
!
!
!
The tow is at risk mostly due to lack of
good data to thoroughly evaluate the
alternative.
The AWJ-21 is currently in the design
phase at Bird-Johnson
Some catamaran data was extrapolated
from commercial designs
Validate the assumption that wave-piercer
and ride stabilization system will reduce
accelerations
Human Factors
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
110
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Recommendations
!
!
!
!
!
Test and evaluate wave-piercing
catamaran hull-forms
Test and evaluate short, semi-fixed tows
Continue composite structure analysis
Develop catamaran ASSET module
Replace CER data in ASSET
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
111
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Questions
!
The Technical
Review will
commence after
lunch at 1300 in the
ME Conference
Room
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
?
112
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
SEA LANCE
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
113
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Corsair and SEA LANCE
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
114
Total Ship Systems Engineering
Team 2000
Corsair and SEA LANCE
14 December 2000
Sea Lance
115