English Language Learners: Exploring Connections to the School Emily Gorski, M.S.Ed. & Jocelyn Newton, Ph.D., NCSP School Psychology Program, University of Wisconsin-La Crosse Introduction Introduction, cont. Abstract: Study purpose: School connectedness leads to positive outcomes for students in terms of academics, behaviors, and general well-being. Little research has focused specifically on the school connectedness of English Language Learners despite the increasing ELL student population. The current study investigated differences in students’ school connectedness as a function of English language proficiency and grade level. Results indicated that there were no differences in level of school connectedness based on English proficiency status or grade level. Background: • • • • • • • English Language Learners (ELL’s) presently comprise 10.8% of the total public school enrollment in the U.S. (equivalent to over 5 million ELL students), and their population is projected to continue to increase (NCELA, 2011). ELL students face a variety of challenges when compared to their native English-speaking peers, including being at a higher risk for academic failure and dropping out of school (Genesee, Lindholm-Leary, Saunders, & Christan, 2005; Janzen, 2008; Verdugo & Flores, 2007). Research also suggests that racial minority groups may experience lower levels of school connectedness and engagement than Caucasian students (Bonny, Britto, Klostermann, Hornung, & Slap, 2000). Therefore, some ELL students may experience lower levels of school connectedness than their native English-speaking peers. School connectedness has been defined by Goodenow (1993) as being “the extent to which students feel personally accepted, respected, included, and supported by others in the school social environment” (p. 80). Research has consistently demonstrated that higher levels of school connectedness are related to positive academic, behavioral, and psychological outcomes. Students with higher school connectedness tend to have higher levels of academic achievement, are less likely to drop out of school, and have greater academic motivation (Waters, Cross, & Runions, 2009). Additionally, school connectedness is an important factor in protecting against grade retention, dropout, delinquency, violence, and substance abuse (Neumark-Sztainer, Story, French, & Resnick, 1997; Resnick et al., 1997, Wehlage, Rutter, Smith, Lesko, & Fernandez, 1989). TEMPLATE DESIGN © 2007 www.PosterPresentations.com Cronbach’s Alpha for the “Hemingway: Measure of Adolescent Connectedness” was .823. Therefore, the survey used for this study was found to be a reliable measure of students’ school connectedness. As important as school connectedness appears to be for student success, little research currently exists that examines this construct relative to English Language Learners. To address this gap in the literature base, this study examined the differences between ELL students and native English-speaking students and middle-school and high-school students in the area of school connectedness. By identifying student groups with low levels of reported school connectedness, school psychologists can help to develop programming and supports that promote school connectedness. Method Results: Univariate Analysis of Variance • Results of the ANOVA revealed that students did not differ significantly in their reported level of school connectedness as a function of their grade level or English proficiency status as determined by the results of this study, F (1, 211) = 0.96, p = .328, partial eta² = .005. Figure 1 Mean School Connectedness Ratings for Middle School and High School ELL and non-ELL Students Participants: • 215 middle- and high-school students from a small Midwestern school district were administered a school connectedness survey and a demographics questionnaire. Instrumentation: • • • The school connectedness survey was an adapted version of Michael Karcher’s “Hemingway: Measure of Adolescent Connectedness” (Karcher, 1999). A demographics questionnaire was used to obtain information about grade level and ELL status. Students also had the option of responding to some additional qualitative questions. Data Analyses: • Reliability analyses were conducted to assess the current adaptation of the adolescent connectedness survey. • A Univariate Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) was conducted to determine if there were differences between the groups as a function of their reported levels of school connectedness. Table 1 Demographics of participants (N=215) Middle School High School • • • • ELL Status ELL Student Non-ELL Student ELL Student Non-ELL Student 58 57 • 56 55 54 52 51 M.S. Non-ELL H.S. ELL H.S. Non-ELL Student Type Results: Qualitative Responses An analysis of students’ responses to the open-ended qualitative questions revealed distinct themes about their attitudes toward school. Both ELL students and native English-speaking students had similar opinions about what would make school a better place: • • The results of this study indicate that ELL students/native English-speaking students and middle-school/high-school students do not differ in their reported levels of school connectedness. These results suggest that, in this school district, students report relatively similar levels of school connectedness regardless of their level of English proficiency or grade level, and that school connectedness is relatively stable between the middle and high school years. These findings are inconsistent with previous research, which has shown that minority students tend to report lower levels of school connectedness. Based on the findings of this study, ELL and native English-speaking students in middle and high school are equally likely to feel connected to their school. However, there are several other factors that contribute to adolescents’ overall connectedness (e.g., family, community) that should also be acknowledged when considering students’ overall well-being. Both ELL and native English-speaking students would likely benefit from school-wide campus climate initiatives, better resources, and improved instruction and classroom management. 53 M.S. ELL • N 25 73 16 101 59 50 Demographics Grade Level Discussion 60 Mean School Connectedness Ratings • Results: Reliability Analysis Improved School Climate • “A bully-free school, be nice to everyone” • “Teachers should be handling bullying problems” • “Less racism” • “Having the kids get along more with other students that are new” Better School Resources, Supports, & Opportunities • “Help students who cannot do their homework” • “More computers, more extracurricular options” • “Healthier meals” Changes to Staff & Administrator Practices • “If teachers actually were into what they teach” • “Better controlled, organized teachers” Directions for Future Research • Investigate student connectedness in districts with smaller populations of ELL students and with fewer supports and programming in place. • Compare connectedness of recently-immigrated ELL students to that of more acclimated ELL students. • Explore and compare the connectedness of additional ELL student populations • Expand the study to include elementary school students, as younger ELL students may have a different school experience than older adolescents. References Bonny, A. E., Britto, M. T., Klostermann, B. K., Hornung, R. W., & Slap, G. B. (2000, November). School disconnectedness: Identifying adolescents at risk. Pediatrics, 106(5), 1017-1021. Genesee, F., Lindholm-Leary, K., Saunders, W., & Christian, D. (2005). English language learners in U.S. schools: An overview of research findings. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10(4), 363385. Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools, 30(1), 79-90. Janzen, J. (2008). Teaching English language learners in the content areas. Review of Educational Research, 78(4), 1010-1038. Karcher, M.J. (1999). The Hemingway – Measure of Adolescent Connectedness: A manual for interpretation and scoring. Unpublished manual, University of Wisconsin – Madison. National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition (NCELA). (2011, February). The growing number of English learner students. In National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition & Language Instruction Educational Programs. Retrieved June 1, 2011 Neumark-Sztainer, D., Story, M., French, S., & Resnick, M. (1997). Psychosocial correlates of health compromising behaviors among adolescents. Health Education Research, 12(1), 37-52. Resnick, M., Bearman, P., Blum, R., Bauman, K., Harris, K., Jones, J., et al. (1997). Protecting adolescents from harm: Findings from the national longitudinal study on adolescent health. Journal of the American Medical Association, 278(10), 823-832.