C.M.1993/B:19 Ref.H A THREE LEVEL PELAGIC TRAWL FOR NEAR SURFACE SAMPLING OF JUVENILE FISH by Olav Rune God~ and John Wl1ly Valdemarsen Institute of Marine Research, P.O. Box 1870 N-5024 Bergen, Norway ABSTRACf In the northeast Atlantic Ocean catch rates ofjuvenile fish from pelagic trawls are used io calculate indices ofrelative abundance which are applied as a first indicatlon of year class strength. A major constraint for a reliable time series of these indices may arise from a varying vertical fish distribution, particularly near the surface due to sampling geai behaviour. In this paper a new three level trawl, whieh sampIes three separate depths simultaneously, is described in detail and catches are compared with catehes from a standard juvenile survey . trawl. The new trawl was highly more effieient in eatehing smalljuveniles in the near surfaee layers than the standard trawl. We eoneluded that changes in densities in this layer eould signifieantly affect the reliability of the eatch data from the standard trawl. • INTRODUCfION In the northeast Arctic, estimation of recruitment of demersal fish has been derived from standardized pelagic trawl surveys run during different phases of the pelagic stage (ANON 1992). TIme series of abundance indices for northeast Arctie eod and haddock have been used to tune recruitment estirilates in the assessment (ANON 1993). God~ et al. (1993) suggested th'at variation in fish size, vertical distribution and migration may stiongly affect the effideney ofthe standard sampling trawl used in these surveys, and consequendy, reduce the reliability of estimated abundance indices of the pelagic. stages of larval gadoids. In this paper we preseni the design of a trawl for detailed studies of vertical distribution of juvenile fish, and some of the results from the first experiments. - MATERIAL AND METHODS Experiments with the staridaTd sampling trawl and a new trawl were canied out onboal"d RN "Michael Sars" (47 m LOA - 15OOhp) during the period May 19-23 1992 at two locatioris off the NOlWegian coast (Fig. 1). Tbe standard sampling trawl (S1') is a four panel. 16 fathoms capeliri trawl with 200 mm mesh size in front and 20 mm in the 40 in long codend (GOd~ ei al. 1993). A 10 mm liner was inserted as cover in 4 rii of the rear pari of the cOderid. Doors and rlgging were the same as presented by Godp et ai. (1993). Tbe experimental trawl (ET) consists of thre6 equal n-il\vls (Fig. 2). mounted ori the top of each other (Fig. 3) to facilitate sampling of tfuee equal voiumes of water at different water depths.Tbe headline of the tipper trawl was equipped with 80 kg flotation whereas 40 kg weights were attached along the lower ground rope. Iri addition 35 kg weights were attached to the lower wingtips of the lowest trawl (Fig. 3). trawl was rigged with 2 m2 Suberkruh doors connected to the wing tips by 50 m bridles. which wem extended with 0.5 for the very upper and Iower pairs (Fig. 3). The m Tbe experiments started with 14 experimental hauls towed alternativeIy with the headline of the upper trawl at surface and at 20 m~ The iows were camed out iri a limited ärea and were followed by 4hauls using the standard ~wi. alternatlvely sarnpling with the headline at surface and 20 m. trials where th~m continuoo with 8 hauls with ST at surface position in the southern Iocation followed by 11 hauls with the ET. 9 ai stirface and 2 with upper heat!1ine at 20 m. A standard tow with both arrangements consisted of the trawl bCing towed for 30 riiinutes at a speed of 2.8-3 knots. Those hauls taken between SUMSe and sunset were considered day hauis and all others night hauis. Due to the shon durarlon of darkness at the Iatitudes cf the experiments in end of May. oniy 4 nighi liauls (2 at sWface arid 2 at 20 m) were taken in northern location and 2 night hauls at surface in the southem location. The Trawl geometry was obserVed with acoustic trawl instrumentation (SCANMAR and Simrad FS3300). The experiments were canied out under favourable weather conditions. RESULTS Trawl geometry and performance Trawl geometry measurements at surface position showed that the ST trawl mouth filters an area of about 300 m2• from 0-30 m depth. When trawling with the headline at 20 m. the area filtered is unchanged but the depth range is reduced to about 20 (see also Godp et al. 1993). m 2 • f , The individual trawl mouths of the ET, observed wÜh the trawl sonar, had equal geomeny, which did not change between depths. Tbe mouths were almost circular with adiameter of 5.5 m (Fig. 3). Trawlirig deptb changed with warp iength as ilhistrilted in Fig. i Standard depths in th6 experiments where the alternatives 1 arid 3 iri Fig. 3; i.e. upper headÜrie at surface and at 20 m. " ., ,J . , vertiCiil distribUtion Mean catches from repeated hauls with ET at 0 and 20 m are assumed to retlect density distriDution of juveniles at 5.5 m intervals to about 35-40 m, from 0 to 16.5ni arid 20 to 35 In respectively (Fig. 3 and 4). Saithe: Saithe was the most abundant species in the trawl catches. In the riorthem iocation the highest concentrations appeared to be at 20-25 ni (Le. in the upper trawl ofthe deepest hauIs) during tbe day (Fig. 4a). Although the lowest numbers were recol'ded in the surface layer during the day, these experiments demonstrated that O-group ,saithe in the area lire distributed in corisiderable qulintities right up to sUrface. This is more obVious from the southerri Iocation (Moere) (Fig. 4a). Here the highest concentratio~s we,re.fourid at surface during both day arid nighi, arid gradtially decreasoo with depth. Ai; in nerthem experiment, catehes in general were lower at night; indicating that flsh were dispersed over wider deptb range at night or thai efficiency of the trawl was Iower at night. ' a Cod: Catehes of cod were much lower than saithe,parncularly in the riortbem Iocation. In the south, day catches indicated reduced densities towams siriface. whereas no such trend , appearect at night (Fig 4b). Catches in north are too Iow to draw ariy conClusion; although the ahnost complete absence cf cod above 11 m at day, underline the same tendency as in south, Le more fish in siiiface layers at night. .Standard trawl - experimental traWl cOmparisOri . " Thc catehes were first adjusted accordirig to volume filtered by the trawl openings, Le. the trawl cateh ofET was arrlved at by multiplying the iridividullI trairls efET by 10 beforo averaging thcm (Gcid~ ct al. (1993). Th6 results shOwed thai the emcieney of the ET exceeds the ST niany times <Fig.5). This is partlcuiarlY clear forsaithe in south (Moere Fig. Sa). Mean Ien~tb comparisÖns Thcre is a great deal of vanation in mean Iength 3.t the different stations and sarnples within the same haul of the ET <Fig. 6). No systematic difference in mean lerigth, iridicaiive cf a depth dependent size distribution; were fourid. For the ST hauls it should be mentioried that the substantial mop in mean length of saithe and the simultaneotisly peak iri coo in southem area, co-occurred during tbe orily night peiicid siüripled with ST (s1.nos. 252-254). 3 DISCUSSION Tb,e new three level sampling trawl furictioned according to expectatiori with only mirior adjustments during the initial trials. If avoidance is negligible problem for sanipling pelagic juveniles, as indicated by God~ et,al. (1993), then the sarnpling trawl and experimental design used in the presented experiment give resolved fish density and size distribution down to about 20 m. This depth range can of course be expanded by peiforming repeated hauls at different depths. The function tests indicated no difficulties by runnirig the upper headline down to depths of 50 m. a Godp et al. (1993) showedthat the low efficiency ofth6 ST would have the strongest eff~ct on indices of aburidance when fish were distributed in the very surface layer, and whe:m diurnal venical movements occurred. In addition to the function test with the new trawl, we wanted to study such effects on results from the standard post larvae survey conducted in April-May, which covered the locations in the present study just before the start of the experiments (Bakkeplass et al. 1992). The main aim of ihat survey has been to estimate year chiss strength of saithe, however, the correlation with reciuitI11ent estimates from VPA has been poor (ANON 1993). The experiments with ET demonstrate an area difference in venical distribution of saithe, i.e. in south ihe highest densides.were found at surface while fish were more evenly distributed in noIth. No systematic diurnal migration appeared, but the saithe seemed to be more dispersed at nighL With the expected lower efficiency of ST at surface due to its bigger mesh sizes and consiruction. compared to that estiinated at deeper water (Godp et al. 1993), the recorded vanability in verucal distribution may thus strongly reduce reliability of the estimated indices. Possibly geogniphic difTerences iather than diurnal, may represent the more important source of vari~bility. Due to ~e de~ign of th6 experiment, Le. the ST hauls were performed either äfter 01' before the ET ha.uls, the catch companson represent a poor basis from which to do accurate coinparison of efficieney. Tbe daia, however, underline the results from previous experiments that ihe ST has a very low erflciency (Godp et al. 1993). Since no systemätle size differences,with depth was observed, then tbis indicates that the low and variable efficiency of 51' will have a less effect on size distribution of the . indices. Tbe day-night difTererices in size indicated for ST in southem area. however, suggest that behavioural factors may affect ST catches. Although the material presented here is riot extensive enough io draw firiri eonciusions on the effect of vertlcaI distribution and migration on abundance indices, the new sampling trawl was found to represerit a useful tool fOf such studies. REFERENCES ANON 1992. Preliminary repon orthe inteinati.onal ~7grouP survey in the Barents Sea arid adjacent waters in August-September 1992. ICES C.M: 1992/G:82: 1-33. ANON 1993. Report of the Aretie fisheries working group. Copenhagen, 25 August - 3 Sep- 4 . e tember 1992. lCES C.M./Assess:l: 1-169. Bakkeplass, K., Nedreaas, K.R., Senneset, R and Smedstad, O.M. 1992. Intern toktrapport. IT 53/92: 1-25. O.R., Valdemarse, I.W. and Engäs, A. 1993. Comparison of efficiency of standard and experimental juvenile gadoid sampling trawls. ICES Mar. symp., 196: 196-201. God~, 5 e 0400 6 600 o 500 o 600 o 7 00 o 800 o 900 1 000 1 1 00 1 200 6 600 MAT RTEX IOP-BOnO!,1-::J[![ mm PMJEL # 2 13.7m ,~ 23 ~/2 PA 1242 4 • 1f48 4 • 1T28 1 • I Tl8 \ z « 40 200 19 \/2 14 94 (l) ('l ::\ ,.) 7~_ ~ .HO 6 500 6 500 PA 414 PA 414 40 14812 :::4 ::55 ~/2 6 400 6400 PA 191: 1;2 414 24 130 PA 6 300 - 552 9 Q... 1.~ / ~ PA 300 130 .300 6 300 ... ~ 414 10 6200 6200 040005000600070008000900100011001200 Fig. 1. Northern and southem experimental areas. Fig. 2. The experimental trawl. 2 A • 5m 1__ I - -=.31: .:m.:-. _ BOkg! to vessel .~~~=10m'=~~~~~;=::====JI 14mm' 20 SUberl<rUb 2 Aluminium 2 m 75 kg 40kg B 01l~1~r---__;;:2=----~3------=4­ ~ ........ 20 E '-" 80 r-, ~----,.____..____r_-.-......,..----.-..____._..."-..---.....----.--....--.-..---.....----.--....--.,-,...--.--.--.---.-.---..----r--.--.,, 100 200 14mme warp 300 24mmfl warp 400 Warp length (m) Fig. 3. Rigging of the experimental trawl and and sampling depth versus warp length at 2.8 kn.. a ,, -. -. l1li TDU:-. AIl&A-1hIroI TDIB-. AR&A-K-. . DEPnI ~ tz#lCthr~\:&""'''':'"'' o III III 40 I '10 10 l1li • I I • 4 I • , I • ~ D ~ DM. M -- n mD III CATCBCol CA:l'CBCol b .~~ .• I • o I . I n...... • • I • CA:l'CBCol , I ......••..J . • n . . .S&"... • D ~ DM. ~ CA:l'CBCol TtJ(E-. AR.EA ....... I o • I • , I • M D ~ CArCIlCol Fig. 4. Vertical distribution of cod in the nonhem (Helge!.) and southem (Moere) area at day (TIme=d) and night (1ime=n), a) Saithe arid b) Cod. SAlTHE TIME=d AREA .. Moere COD TIME=d AREA-Moere CA'l'CH(o) .---, CATCH(n) .--liOO 140 ---, J30 12D 110 100 00 81 '10 60 60 40 1IO m 10 o IJEI'11I IJEI'1'11 o o COD llME=d AREA= IIc1gcl CATClI(n) ...----, liO DEPTII DEPTIl o o Fig. 5. Comparison of ST and ET catches of cod and saithe after standardization to~lume filtered by the trawl openings. e • 3Ji 3.4 NORrH 3.3 32 8.1 ~ 3.0 ~2.9 ..J ~2.8 ~2.7 2.6 2.li U 2.3 2.2 230 250 240 260 270 2!10 STATION NO. COD 6 er··. i •••• NOIlTB j ii i 80trrH ~ "'< J\ = .... " 1 •.•. , , ····1 \ . i ,".'.J, : : , I ."J 1 I t ...... "'", ...,-""- :, :I t\ 8 e--?,-.. i~ • r \ 230 __... - \ U _----- 'li:> \ I ",.. ~'..-J--, -, ,:1=' I ,~ I ,I l 2"'r-...... ;, -.-~_~ ... \ '-'\ \ : J, ~ .\1 \ :0 - ~ ........._ ......--~ _ _.....,....--~_ _.....,....----_ _._ 260 200 270 STATION NO. Fig. 6. Comparison of mean length in the individual trawl hauls and samples within the ET hauls (1) upper, 2)middel,3) lower sample) and ST (4).