C.M.1993/B:19 Ref.H A THREE LEVEL PELAGIC TRAWL FOR NEAR SURFACE SAMPLING OF

advertisement
C.M.1993/B:19
Ref.H
A THREE LEVEL PELAGIC TRAWL FOR NEAR SURFACE SAMPLING OF
JUVENILE FISH
by
Olav Rune God~ and John Wl1ly Valdemarsen
Institute of Marine Research,
P.O. Box 1870 N-5024 Bergen,
Norway
ABSTRACf
In the northeast Atlantic Ocean catch rates ofjuvenile fish from pelagic trawls are used io
calculate indices ofrelative abundance which are applied as a first indicatlon of year class
strength. A major constraint for a reliable time series of these indices may arise from a varying vertical fish distribution, particularly near the surface due to sampling geai behaviour.
In this paper a new three level trawl, whieh sampIes three separate depths simultaneously, is
described in detail and catches are compared with catehes from a standard juvenile survey
. trawl. The new trawl was highly more effieient in eatehing smalljuveniles in the near surfaee
layers than the standard trawl. We eoneluded that changes in densities in this layer eould signifieantly affect the reliability of the eatch data from the standard trawl.
•
INTRODUCfION
In the northeast Arctic, estimation of recruitment of demersal fish has been derived from
standardized pelagic trawl surveys run during different phases of the pelagic stage (ANON
1992). TIme series of abundance indices for northeast Arctie eod and haddock have been
used to tune recruitment estirilates in the assessment (ANON 1993). God~ et al. (1993) suggested th'at variation in fish size, vertical distribution and migration may stiongly affect the
effideney ofthe standard sampling trawl used in these surveys, and consequendy, reduce the
reliability of estimated abundance indices of the pelagic. stages of larval gadoids.
In this paper we preseni the design of a trawl for detailed studies of vertical distribution of
juvenile fish, and some of the results from the first experiments.
-
MATERIAL AND METHODS
Experiments with the staridaTd sampling trawl and a new trawl were canied out onboal"d RN
"Michael Sars" (47 m LOA - 15OOhp) during the period May 19-23 1992 at two locatioris off
the NOlWegian coast (Fig. 1).
Tbe standard sampling trawl (S1') is a four panel. 16 fathoms capeliri trawl with 200 mm
mesh size in front and 20 mm in the 40 in long codend (GOd~ ei al. 1993). A 10 mm liner was
inserted as cover in 4 rii of the rear pari of the cOderid. Doors and rlgging were the same as
presented by Godp et ai. (1993).
Tbe experimental trawl (ET) consists of thre6 equal n-il\vls (Fig. 2). mounted ori the top of
each other (Fig. 3) to facilitate sampling of tfuee equal voiumes of water at different water
depths.Tbe headline of the tipper trawl was equipped with 80 kg flotation whereas 40 kg
weights were attached along the lower ground rope. Iri addition 35 kg weights were attached
to the lower wingtips of the lowest trawl (Fig. 3).
trawl was rigged with 2 m2 Suberkruh
doors connected to the wing tips by 50 m bridles. which wem extended with 0.5 for the
very upper and Iower pairs (Fig. 3).
The
m
Tbe experiments started with 14 experimental hauls towed alternativeIy with the headline of
the upper trawl at surface and at 20 m~ The iows were camed out iri a limited ärea and were
followed by 4hauls using the standard ~wi. alternatlvely sarnpling with the headline at surface and 20 m.
trials where th~m continuoo with 8 hauls with ST at surface position in the
southern Iocation followed by 11 hauls with the ET. 9 ai stirface and 2 with upper heat!1ine at
20 m. A standard tow with both arrangements consisted of the trawl bCing towed for 30 riiinutes at a speed of 2.8-3 knots. Those hauls taken between SUMSe and sunset were considered
day hauis and all others night hauis. Due to the shon durarlon of darkness at the Iatitudes cf
the experiments in end of May. oniy 4 nighi liauls (2 at sWface arid 2 at 20 m) were taken in
northern location and 2 night hauls at surface in the southem location.
The
Trawl geometry was obserVed with acoustic trawl instrumentation (SCANMAR and Simrad
FS3300).
The experiments were canied out under favourable weather conditions.
RESULTS
Trawl geometry and performance
Trawl geometry measurements at surface position showed that the ST trawl mouth filters an
area of about 300 m2• from 0-30 m depth. When trawling with the headline at 20 m. the area
filtered is unchanged but the depth range is reduced to about 20 (see also Godp et al.
1993).
m
2
•
f
,
The individual trawl mouths of the ET, observed wÜh the trawl sonar, had equal geomeny,
which did not change between depths. Tbe mouths were almost circular with adiameter of
5.5 m (Fig. 3). Trawlirig deptb changed with warp iength as ilhistrilted in Fig. i Standard
depths in th6 experiments where the alternatives 1 arid 3 iri Fig. 3; i.e. upper headÜrie at surface and at 20 m.
"
.,
,J
.
,
vertiCiil distribUtion
Mean catches from repeated hauls with ET at 0 and 20 m are assumed to retlect density distriDution of juveniles at 5.5 m intervals to about 35-40 m, from 0 to 16.5ni arid 20 to 35 In
respectively (Fig. 3 and 4).
Saithe: Saithe was the most abundant species in the trawl catches. In the riorthem iocation the
highest concentrations appeared to be at 20-25 ni (Le. in the upper trawl ofthe deepest hauIs)
during tbe day (Fig. 4a). Although the lowest numbers were recol'ded in the surface layer during the day, these experiments demonstrated that O-group ,saithe in the area lire distributed in
corisiderable qulintities right up to sUrface. This is more obVious from the southerri Iocation
(Moere) (Fig. 4a). Here the highest concentratio~s we,re.fourid at surface during both day arid
nighi, arid gradtially decreasoo with depth. Ai; in nerthem experiment, catehes in general
were lower at night; indicating that flsh were dispersed over wider deptb range at night or
thai efficiency of the trawl was Iower at night.
'
a
Cod: Catehes of cod were much lower than saithe,parncularly in the riortbem Iocation. In the
south, day catches indicated reduced densities towams siriface. whereas no such trend ,
appearect at night (Fig 4b). Catches in north are too Iow to draw ariy conClusion; although the
ahnost complete absence cf cod above 11 m at day, underline the same tendency as in south,
Le more fish in siiiface layers at night.
.Standard trawl - experimental traWl cOmparisOri
.
"
Thc catehes were first adjusted accordirig to volume filtered by the trawl openings, Le. the
trawl cateh ofET was arrlved at by multiplying the iridividullI trairls efET by 10 beforo
averaging thcm (Gcid~ ct al. (1993). Th6 results shOwed thai the emcieney of the ET exceeds
the ST niany times <Fig.5). This is partlcuiarlY clear forsaithe in south (Moere Fig. Sa).
Mean Ien~tb comparisÖns
Thcre is a great deal of vanation in mean Iength 3.t the different stations and sarnples within
the same haul of the ET <Fig. 6). No systematic difference in mean lerigth, iridicaiive cf a
depth dependent size distribution; were fourid. For the ST hauls it should be mentioried that
the substantial mop in mean length of saithe and the simultaneotisly peak iri coo in southem
area, co-occurred during tbe orily night peiicid siüripled with ST (s1.nos. 252-254).
3
DISCUSSION
Tb,e new three level sampling trawl furictioned according to expectatiori with only mirior
adjustments during the initial trials. If avoidance is negligible problem for sanipling pelagic
juveniles, as indicated by God~ et,al. (1993), then the sarnpling trawl and experimental
design used in the presented experiment give resolved fish density and size distribution down
to about 20 m. This depth range can of course be expanded by peiforming repeated hauls at
different depths. The function tests indicated no difficulties by runnirig the upper headline
down to depths of 50 m.
a
Godp et al. (1993) showedthat the low efficiency ofth6 ST would have the strongest eff~ct
on indices of aburidance when fish were distributed in the very surface layer, and whe:m diurnal venical movements occurred. In addition to the function test with the new trawl, we
wanted to study such effects on results from the standard post larvae survey conducted in
April-May, which covered the locations in the present study just before the start of the experiments (Bakkeplass et al. 1992). The main aim of ihat survey has been to estimate year chiss
strength of saithe, however, the correlation with reciuitI11ent estimates from VPA has been
poor (ANON 1993). The experiments with ET demonstrate an area difference in venical distribution of saithe, i.e. in south ihe highest densides.were found at surface while fish were
more evenly distributed in noIth. No systematic diurnal migration appeared, but the saithe
seemed to be more dispersed at nighL With the expected lower efficiency of ST at surface
due to its bigger mesh sizes and consiruction. compared to that estiinated at deeper water
(Godp et al. 1993), the recorded vanability in verucal distribution may thus strongly reduce
reliability of the estimated indices. Possibly geogniphic difTerences iather than diurnal, may
represent the more important source of vari~bility. Due to ~e de~ign of th6 experiment, Le.
the ST hauls were performed either äfter 01' before the ET ha.uls, the catch companson represent a poor basis from which to do accurate coinparison of efficieney. Tbe daia, however,
underline the results from previous experiments that ihe ST has a very low erflciency (Godp
et al. 1993). Since no systemätle size differences,with depth was observed, then tbis indicates
that the low and variable efficiency of 51' will have a less effect on size distribution of the .
indices. Tbe day-night difTererices in size indicated for ST in southem area. however, suggest
that behavioural factors may affect ST catches. Although the material presented here is riot
extensive enough io draw firiri eonciusions on the effect of vertlcaI distribution and migration
on abundance indices, the new sampling trawl was found to represerit a useful tool fOf such
studies.
REFERENCES
ANON 1992. Preliminary repon orthe inteinati.onal ~7grouP survey in the Barents Sea arid
adjacent waters in August-September 1992. ICES C.M: 1992/G:82: 1-33.
ANON 1993. Report of the Aretie fisheries working group. Copenhagen, 25 August - 3 Sep-
4
.
e
tember 1992. lCES C.M./Assess:l: 1-169.
Bakkeplass, K., Nedreaas, K.R., Senneset, R and Smedstad, O.M. 1992. Intern toktrapport.
IT 53/92: 1-25.
O.R., Valdemarse, I.W. and Engäs, A. 1993. Comparison of efficiency of standard and
experimental juvenile gadoid sampling trawls. ICES Mar. symp., 196: 196-201.
God~,
5
e
0400
6 600
o 500 o 600 o 7 00 o 800 o 900
1 000 1 1 00 1 200
6 600
MAT
RTEX
IOP-BOnO!,1-::J[![
mm
PMJEL
#
2
13.7m
,~
23 ~/2
PA
1242
4 • 1f48
4 • 1T28
1 • I Tl8
\
z
«
40
200
19 \/2
14
94
(l)
('l
::\
,.)
7~_
~
.HO
6 500
6 500
PA
414
PA
414
40
14812
:::4
::55 ~/2
6 400
6400
PA
191: 1;2
414
24
130
PA
6 300 -
552
9 Q... 1.~
/ ~
PA
300
130
.300
6 300
...
~
414
10
6200
6200
040005000600070008000900100011001200
Fig. 1. Northern and southem experimental areas.
Fig. 2. The experimental trawl.
2
A
•
5m
1__ I
- -=.31: .:m.:-.
_
BOkg!
to vessel
.~~~=10m'=~~~~~;=::====JI
14mm'
20
SUberl<rUb
2
Aluminium 2 m
75 kg
40kg
B
01l~1~r---__;;:2=----~3------=4­
~
........ 20
E
'-"
80
r-,
~----,.____..____r_-.-......,..----.-..____._..."-..---.....----.--....--.-..---.....----.--....--.,-,...--.--.--.---.-.---..----r--.--.,,
100
200
14mme warp
300
24mmfl warp
400
Warp length (m)
Fig. 3. Rigging of the experimental trawl and and sampling depth versus warp length at 2.8
kn..
a
,,
-. -.
l1li
TDU:-. AIl&A-1hIroI
TDIB-. AR&A-K-.
.
DEPnI
~ tz#lCthr~\:&""'''':'"''
o
III
III
40
I
'10
10
l1li
• I I • 4 I • , I •
~
D
~
DM. M
--
n mD
III
CATCBCol
CA:l'CBCol
b
.~~
.•
I
•
o I
.
I
n......
•
•
I
•
CA:l'CBCol
,
I
......••..J .
• n
. . .S&"...
•
D
~
DM.
~
CA:l'CBCol
TtJ(E-. AR.EA .......
I
o
•
I
•
,
I
•
M
D
~
CArCIlCol
Fig. 4. Vertical distribution of cod in the nonhem (Helge!.) and southem (Moere) area at day
(TIme=d) and night (1ime=n), a) Saithe arid b) Cod.
SAlTHE TIME=d AREA .. Moere
COD TIME=d AREA-Moere
CA'l'CH(o) .---,
CATCH(n) .--liOO
140
---,
J30
12D
110
100
00
81
'10
60
60
40
1IO
m
10
o
IJEI'11I
IJEI'1'11
o
o
COD llME=d AREA= IIc1gcl
CATClI(n) ...----,
liO
DEPTII
DEPTIl
o
o
Fig. 5. Comparison of ST and ET catches of cod and saithe after standardization to~lume
filtered by the trawl openings.
e
•
3Ji
3.4
NORrH
3.3
32
8.1
~ 3.0
~2.9
..J
~2.8
~2.7
2.6
2.li
U
2.3
2.2
230
250
240
260
270
2!10
STATION NO.
COD
6
er··.
i ••••
NOIlTB
j
ii
i
80trrH
~
"'<
J\
= ....
"
1 •.•. , ,
····1 \
.
i
,".'.J,
:
:
,
I
."J
1
I
t ......
"'",
...,-""-
:,
:I
t\
8
e--?,-.. i~
•
r
\
230
__... -
\ U _-----
'li:> \
I ",.. ~'..-J--,
-,
,:1='
I
,~
I
,I
l
2"'r-......
;,
-.-~_~
...
\
'-'\
\ :
J,
~ .\1
\ :0
-
~
........._ ......--~ _ _.....,....--~_ _.....,....----_ _._
260
200
270
STATION NO.
Fig. 6. Comparison of mean length in the individual trawl hauls and samples within the ET
hauls (1) upper, 2)middel,3) lower sample) and ST (4).
Download