Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 1 of 13
DRAFT
MINUTES OF MEETING
1
BERKELEY DIVISION OF THE ACADEMIC SENATE
Thursday, May 1, 2014
The fall meeting of the Berkeley Division was called to order at 3:10 p.m. on Thursday,
May 1, 2014, in Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall, pursuant to call. Professor
Elizabeth Deakin, chair of the Berkeley Division, presided. More than 50 Senate
members needed for quorum were in attendance. The agenda was approved.
I.
Minutes (Enclosure 1)
ACTION: The minutes of the November 21, 2013 Division meeting were
approved without objection.
II.
Announcements by the President
UC President Janet Napolitano was unable to attend this meeting.
III.
Other Announcements
A.
Chancellor Nicholas Dirks
Chancellor Dirks recently attended the Association of American
Universities (AAU) meeting. The three top discussion topics there are also
issues of concern at Berkeley.
•
•
•
•
•
Intercollegiate athletics and academics: Berkeley’s efforts to
improve academic achievement for student athletes have had
results. It is expected that several teams will be recognized by the
National Collegiate Athletic Association for their academic
progress. A report from a campus task force on academics and
athletics is also expected.
Undergraduate education: The joint Senate-administrative
Undergraduate Education Initiative Planning Group has begun to
evaluate a wide range of issues affecting undergraduates. Berkeley
Connect has been expanded (see also Item IX of this meeting).
Initiatives: Other initiatives are underway in global education,
access to the arts, equity, diversity, and climate.
Sexual assault: The campus underwent a state audit of its policies
and practices pertaining to incidences of sexual assault. The
campus will create a new staff position and improve its response to
these cases.
Budget: The campus budget has been stabilized. New strategies
are needed to support the academic mission with the loss of so
much state funding; a new capital campaign is planned.
Recordings of Divisional Meetings are available online at http://academic-senate.berkeley.edu/division-meetings,
or by appointment at the Academic Senate Office. Contact <acad_sen@berkeley.edu> for more information.
1
1
Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 2 of 13
•
B.
Undergraduate admissions: The Senate will participate in a broad
evaluation of the admissions process.
Berkeley Division Chair Elizabeth Deakin
Division Chair Deakin reported on a number of current issues of concern
for the Senate:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Academic planning: The Senate applauds the plan for a new
strategic academic plan. This is timely and will help the University
adapt to its new environment and role.
Budget: With decreased state support, a new budget model is
needed. Greater investment in faculty is also needed. A new model
of capital planning has been established.
Retirement plan: Funding of the retirement plan is a high priority.
The state’s funding responsibility is still unresolved, but employee
contributions will increase as of July.
Health plan coverage: Open enrollment was rocky due to major
changes in health plan coverage. The Committee on Faculty
Welfare (FWEL) was commended for their leadership in protecting
faculty interests, although continued vigilance is needed. (See also
Item VI.C. for a report from FWEL on this issue).
Information technology (IT): Greater investment in support
systems is needed to improve the efficient delivery of services and
to help compensate for the loss of staff in recent years.
Improvements are being made to the student and budget process
systems.
Teaching: The Senate must ensure that the educational value
offered is appropriate to the amount of tuition charged. The
Committee on Teaching (COT) is developing recommendations for
the evaluation of teaching using a broadened definition of teaching.
(See also Item IX of this meeting).
Research funding: A new process for distributing research funding
to faculty will be piloted beginning in the fall.
Library: Funding for the Library must be increased and stabilized.
Senate committees: Chair Deakin called attention to the legislative
proposals on this meeting’s Consent Calendar, which would
change the Senate committee structure. It is proposed that the
committees on Faculty Welfare and University-Emeriti Relations
combine within the Committee on Faculty Welfare; leadership of
the reconfigured committee would serve on Divisional Council.
Another proposal would join the Committee on the Status of
Women and Ethnic Minorities and the Committee on Student
Diversity and Academic Development in a new committee on
Diversity, Equity, and Campus Climate, having a broader purview
over diversity and climate-related issues than previously.
Chair Deakin announced the incoming Divisional leadership for 2014-15:
Professor Panos Papadopoulos (Mechanical Engineering) will become
2
Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 3 of 13
Division chair and Professor Benjamin Hermalin
Administration/Economics) will become Division vice chair.
C.
(Business
Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost Claude Steele
Executive Vice Chancellor and Provost (EVCP) Steele spent his first month
in the position learning about the campus in a variety of ways including
participating in the campus budget process and through interactions with
students and the Office of the President. Key challenges he sees are faculty
recruitment and retention, and the quality of undergraduate life.
Berkeley’s national and international academic rankings are exceptional.
He notes that data show the number of low-income students served at
Berkeley is quite notable; Berkeley can indeed be proud.
D.
ASUC Academic Affairs Vice President Valerie Jameson
Vice President Jameson was unable to attend the meeting, so ASUC
President DJ Pepito read Vice President Jameson’s remarks on her behalf,
summarized here.
The ASUC supports and is participating in the undergraduate education
initiative and other efforts that improve the undergraduate experience.
Numerous programs on campus assist students in their academic goals
and provide community; these are valuable and should be funded into the
future. The ASUC also values diversity in the staff and faculty, and
mentoring. The ASUC has appreciated Division Chair Deakin’s support,
and hopes to continue a strong relationship with the Senate.
IV.
Special Orders-Consent Calendar
For proposed legislative amendments, additions to the current text are noted by an
underline; deletions to the current text are noted by a strikethrough line. Per Division
bylaws the consent calendar is approved in the absence of a quorum.
A.
Proposed amendments to Berkeley Division Bylaw 21 governing the
Committee on Faculty Welfare
Divisional Council proposes amendments to Berkeley Division Bylaw 21
to enhance the division’s response to faculty welfare issues by
incorporating the concerns of both regular and emeriti faculty into one
restructured committee.
21.
Faculty Welfare
A.
Membership
This committee has a chair and a co-chair, one of whom
should be an emerita/emeritus. The committee has at least
twelve voting members, of whom one-third should be
emeriti.
B.
Duties
This committee confers with campus administrators on
matters concerning the general welfare of both regular and
emeriti faculty, such as conditions of employment, office
space, salary policy, benefits, dependent care, housing, and
3
Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 4 of 13
other matters pertaining to either or both of the constituents.
It The committee reports and recommends to the division on
these issues.
B.
Proposed amendments to Berkeley Division Bylaw 25 governing the
Committee on Research
Divisional Council proposes amendments to Berkeley Division Bylaw 25
to reflect the current duties of the committee.
25.
Research
A.
Membership!
This Committee has a Chair, a Vice Chair, and at least fifteen
Senate members.
B.
C.
Duties
•
This Committee advises the Division in all matters
pertaining to the research mission of the Division and
the University;
•
Confers with and advises the Chancellor and the Vice
Chancellor-Research
on
faculty
perspectives
regarding research policy matters;
•
Maintains regular contact with other Committees of
the Division on matters relating to research policy
and allocations, such as the Committees on the
Library, Computing and Communications, and
Academic Planning and Resource Allocation;
•
Establishes policies and procedures governing
allocations to the Committee, and administers and
allocates funds designated for research according to
established policy; determines recipients of faculty
research and travel grants, and;
•
Makes recommendations to the VC-Research based
on review reports of Organized Research Units.
Proposed repeal of Berkeley Division Bylaw 28 governing the
Committee on University-Emeriti Relations
Divisional Council proposes the repeal of Bylaw 28 to reflect the inclusion
of emeriti in the membership and duties of the Committee on Faculty
Welfare.
28. University-Emeriti Relations
A. Membership
This Committee has at least five members, of whom at least three
are emeriti and one of whom will be a member of the Committee
on Faculty Welfare. (CC. 4.25.05)
B. Duties
The Committee:
4
Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 5 of 13
1. Represents the interests of emeriti and communicates their
needs to the appropriate bodies of the Division;
2. Works closely with the Retirement Center and the Berkeley
Emeriti Association to maintain communication with the
emeriti and assess their interests and needs;
3. Maintains liaison with Committee on Faculty Welfare and
appoints subcommittees to maintain liaison with other
academic bodies as deemed appropriate; and (CC 4.25.05)
4. Serves as a resource for the Retirement Center and assists the
Center in identifying and responding to the needs of emeriti
as appropriate.
D.
Proposed amendments to Berkeley Division Bylaw 45 governing the
Committee on Teaching
Divisional Council proposes amendments to Berkeley Division Bylaw 45
to reflect the current duties of the committee.
45.
Teaching
A.
Membership!
This Committee has at least five Senate members, of whom a
minimum of two should be past recipients of the
Distinguished Teaching Award, and two student members,
one undergraduate and one graduate student.
23
B.
E.
Duties
1.•
Encourage Stimulate and aid all departments to
strengthen their efforts to foster, recognize, and
reward good teaching;
2.•
Nominate members of the Faculty for approval by the
Divisional Council to receive Distinguished Teaching
Awards and other awards as appropriate. Upon
request from the Chancellor or members of the
Chancellor’s cabinet, solicit and submit nominations
of faculty members as potential recipients of external
awards for teaching;
3.•
Initiate, receive, and fund proposals for instructional
improvement and development. Advise the
administration on the allocation of resources for
instructional improvement and development;
4.•
Undertake special activities to improve teaching and
learning on campus;
5.•
Study issues all problems concerning improvement of
teaching on the campus and its recognition through
promotion and tenure and, from time to time, make
pertinent recommendations to the Berkeley Division.
Proposed enactment of a Berkeley Division bylaw to govern the
5
Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 6 of 13
Committee on Diversity, Equity, and Campus Climate
Divisional Council proposes enactment of Berkeley Division Bylaw
[number to be determined] to form the Committee on Diversity, Equity,
and Campus Climate, in conjunction with the rescission of the bylaws
governing the Committee on the Status of Women and Ethnic Minorities
and the Committee on Student Diversity and Academic Development. The
restructured committee will facilitate a more effective Senate voice on
issues of diversity, equity, and campus climate.
Committee on Diversity, Equity, and Campus Climate
A.
Membership
This Committee consists of at least twelve Senate members,
two student members, and, as ex officio non-voting members,
the Vice Chancellor for Equity and Inclusion and the
Associate Vice Provost for the Faculty.
19
B.
F.
Duties
•
To encourage and aid departments in strengthening
their efforts to foster and achieve equality of
opportunity for academic personnel, students, and
academic programs;
•
To review information on the status of affirmative
action, campus climate, and diversity provided by the
campus and University administrations and make
recommendations regarding said findings to the
Divisional Council;
•
To report to the Division annually on the progress of
the campus in achieving equality of opportunity and
a supportive campus climate for underrepresented
and otherwise excluded groups;
•
To advise, aid, and review academic preparation and
development programs (from pre-college to graduate
level) in order to help such programs encourage and
aid students who have encountered restricted
educational opportunities.
Proposed repeal of Berkeley Division Bylaw 42
Divisional Council proposes the repeal of Berkeley Division Bylaw 42 in
conjunction with the formation of the Committee on Diversity, Equity,
and Campus Climate.
42. Status of Women and Ethnic Minorities
A. Membership
This Committee consists of at least six Senate members, one of
whom is a Vice Chair, two student members, and, as ex officio nonvoting members, the Vice Chancellor for Equity and Inclusion and
the Associate Vice Provost for the Faculty.
19
B. Duties
6
Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 7 of 13
G.
o
To stimulate and aid all departments in strengthening their
efforts to foster and achieve equality of opportunity for
women and minorities;
o
To conduct continuous review of all problems concerning
the status of women and ethnic minorities on the Berkeley
Campus; and
o
To report to the Division annually on the progress of the
Campus in achieving equality of opportunity for women
and minorities.
Proposed repeal of Berkeley Division Bylaw 44 governing the
Committee on Student Diversity and Academic Development
Divisional Council proposes the repeal of Berkeley Division Bylaw 44 in
conjunction with the formation of the Committee on Diversity, Equity,
and Campus Climate.
44. Student Diversity and Academic Development
A. Membership
o
This Committee consists of at least ten Senate members and
of two student members.
22
o
The Committee may nominate as non-voting members, for
approval by the Committee on Committees, such nonmembers of the Academic Senate, to a maximum of five, as it
deems advisable.
B. Duties
This committee advises, aids, and reviews academic preparation
and development programs (from pre-college to graduate level) in
order to help such programs encourage and aid students of the
highest academic promise who have encountered restricted
educational opportunities due to racial, ethnic, and/or gender
preferences or other social or economic conditions.
This committee seeks to aid the development of the full potential of
such students, particularly in those areas of study and work in
which students who have encountered restricted educational
opportunities are poorly represented, and thereby to promote
student diversity on campus and in the professions.
This committee encourages and aids members of the Berkeley
faculty to participate in achieving the goals outlined above.
H.
Proposed amendments to Berkeley Division Regulation 952 governing
the Master of Public Health Degree (M.P.H.)
The School of Public Health Faculty Advisory Council has recommended
the proposed revision to reflect the importance it places on the grades
earned in core courses. Divisional Council and the Committee on Rules
and Elections approved the proposed amendments.
952.
MASTER OF PUBLIC HEALTH DEGREE (M.P.H.) (Am. 11.13.08,
7
Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 8 of 13
3.83, 11.2.11)
A.
B.
C.
Unit Requirements
•
The candidate must have completed at least 42 units
of course work acceptable to the Faculty of the School
of Public Health.
•
With approval of the Executive Committee of the
Faculty of the School, a candidate may be authorized
to present an acceptable thesis in lieu of four of the 42
units required.
Grades
•
Only courses in which the candidate is assigned
grades A, B, C (including plus or minus grades), or
Satisfactory may be counted in satisfaction of
requirements for the Master's Degree, except for
core courses specified by the Faculty of the School of
Public Health. The candidate must receive a letter
grade of B- or higher in core courses.
•
The candidate must maintain an average of not less
than three grade points per unit in all courses
required or elected while enrolled as a graduate
student at the University of California.
Final Examination
A comprehensive final examination either in the field of
specialization or in the general field of public health, as
determined by the supervisory faculty committee, is
required of each candidate.
D.
Field Training
The candidate must have complete at least twelve weeks of
field training in an approved public health agency. This
requirement may be met by previous qualifying experience.
I.
Regulations 751, 754 and 755 of the Berkeley Division, regarding the
LL.M. (Master of Laws) and J.S.D. (Doctor of the Science of Law)
degrees
The School of Law faculty proposes amendments to Berkeley Division
Regulations 751, 754, and 755 to reflect changes in requirements.
Divisional Council, Graduate Council and the Committee on Rules and
Elections approved the proposed amendments.
751. ADMISSION TO GRADUATE CURRICULUM
There may be admitted to the graduate curriculum in law:
8
Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 9 of 13
A.
LL.M. Degree
As a candidate for the degree of Master of Laws (L..L.M.),
any applicant who has had at least six four years of resident
study at approved colleges and law schools, who holds a
professional degree from a law school approved by the
American Bar Association or foreign equivalent, and who, in
the opinion of the Faculty of the School, gives evidence of
capacity to complete the requirements for the LL.M. Degree
degree; except that an applicant who has not received the
A.B., B.S.,LL.B., J.D., or equivalent degree may be admitted
only if the Faculty of the School of Law concludes that the
applicant’s otherwise meets the requirements for practicing
law in the applicant’s home jurisdiction preparation in social
sciences other than law has not been unreasonably limited;
or
B.
J.S.D. Degree
As a candidate for the degree of Doctor of the Science of Law
(J.S.D.), any applicant who has had at least six five years of
resident study at approved colleges and law schools, who
holds an advanced law professional degree from a law
school approved by the American Bar Association or foreign
equivalent, and who, in the opinion of the Faculty of the
School, gives evidence of capacity to complete requirements
for the J.S.D. degree; except that an applicant who has not
received the A.B., B.S., or equivalent an advanced law
degree may be admitted only if the Faculty of the School of
Law concludes that the applicant’s preparation in social
sciences other than law has not been unreasonably limited
gives evidence of capacity of complete the requirements for
the J.S.D. degree.
C.
Non-Degree
•
There may also be admitted to the graduate curriculum
in law, though not as a candidate for a degree, any
applicant who holds a professional degree from a law
school approved by the American Bar Association or
foreign equivalent, and who, in the opinion of the
Faculty of the School, gives evidence of capacity to
continue advanced legal study successfully.
•
An applicant so admitted may, after completion of one
academic year of resident study, depending on his or her
achievement and proved ability, be admitted as a
candidate for the degree of Master of Laws or Doctor of
the Science of Law.
9
Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 10 of 13
754. LL.M. DEGREE
The degree of Master of Laws (LL.M.) will be granted on the following
conditions:
A.
Prior to the completion of the candidate’s resident study, the
candidate must have been admitted to the graduate
curriculum in law as a candidate for the decree degree of
Master of Laws or Doctor of the Science of Law.
B.
The candidate must have completed with distinction, under
the direction of an advisory committee appointed by the
Faculty of the School, a program of resident study including
no fewer than 16 20 units of approved courses or seminars,
or an equivalent program in research.
C.
The candidate must have completed a research project
demonstrating a capacity for legal scholarship.
755. J.S.D. DEGREE
The degree of Doctor of the Science of Law (J.S.D.) will be granted on the
following conditions:
A.
Prior to completion of the candidate’s resident study, the
candidate must have been admitted to the graduate
curriculum in Law law as a candidate for this degree.
B.
The candidate must have completed with high distinction,
under the direction of an advisory committee appointed by
the Faculty of the School, a program of resident study
including no fewer than 20 24 units of approved courses or
seminars coursework, or an equivalent program of and
independent research.
C.
Before advancement to candidacy for the degree, the The
candidate must have passed an oral examination, in such
field or fields of study as he or she may select, with approval
of the advisory committee.
D.
The candidate must have presented, not earlier than six
months after completion of his or her resident study
coursework requirement, a dissertation suitable for
publication which, in the opinion the advisory committee,
constitutes a useful contribution in the field with which it
deals.
ACTION: The consent calendar was approved as noticed.
10
Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 11 of 13
VI.
Reports of Standing Committees
A.
Faculty Awards (Written report only – Enclosure 2)
The committee’s award activities this year have included the following
actions:
•
Two nominations for the Edward A. Dickson Emeriti Professorship
and one for the Constantine Panunzio Distinguished Emeriti
Award have been recommended and are pending.
•
The committee made a recommendation for the 2014 Clark Kerr
Award which was approved by Divisional Council. A formal
presentation of the award was made to Dr. Marye Anne Fox,
chancellor emerita of UC San Diego.
•
The committee solicited nominations for the 2014 Berkeley Faculty
Service Award.
B.
Faculty Research Lectures (Written report only – Enclosure 3)
Two outstanding faculty have been selected to present the 2015 Martin
Meyerson Berkeley Faculty Research Lectures: Professor Jennifer Doudna
(Molecular & Cell Biology) and Professor Montgomery Slatkin (Integrative
Biology).
C.
Faculty Welfare
Professor Calvin Moore, chair of the Committee on Faculty Welfare
(FWEL), reported on new options in UC health coverage. In particular, the
benefits for one group of retirees have raised much concern. Out-of-state
Medicare emeriti are now given a stipend with which to purchase
Medigap policies through a third party that has proven so far to be much
less than satisfactory. FWEL is concerned that this process could
potentially be applied to all Medicare retirees in the future.
The new UC Care health plan does not include the John Muir Medical
Group among its top tier providers. FWEL encourages all faculty to send
comments on the health plans to UC President Janet Napolitano and the
UC Committee on Faculty Welfare.
D.
Rules and Elections (Enclosure 4)
Professor Gary Holland, Division secretary and chair of the Committee on
Rules and Elections, presented the results of the Divisional election. There
were 488 valid ballots cast.
Senate members elected to the Divisional Council:
Suzanne Guerlac (French)
Kevin Padian (Integrative Biology)
Mary Ann Smart (Music)
Senate members elected to the Committee on Committees of the Berkeley
Division:
William Drummond (Journalism)
Sofia Villas-Boas (Agricultural and Resource Economics)
Ming Wu (Electrical Engineering and Computer Science)
Maciej Zworski (Mathematics)
11
Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 12 of 13
Chair Holland thanked all those who ran.
VII.
Petitions of Students
None
VIII. Unfinished Business
None
IX.
University and Faculty Welfare (Discussion only)
A.
Strengthening the Undergraduate Experience at UC Berkeley
A panel discussion was held on strengthening the undergraduate
experience at UC Berkeley. Division Vice Chair Panos Papadopoulos
moderated the panel which included Professor Eric Talley (Law), chair of
the Committee on Budget and Interdepartmental Relations (BIR);
Associate Professor Maura Nolan (English), director of Berkeley Connect;
and Professor Daniel Melia (Rhetoric/Celtic Studies), 2012-13 chair of the
Committee on Courses of Instruction and former associate dean for
student services in the College of Letters and Science.
Division Vice Chair Papadopoulos presented data on undergraduate
education and the student experience. While Berkeley’s undergraduate
application rate and enrollment have increased over the past decade, there
has been a slight decrease in undergraduate teaching by permanent
faculty. Overall, surveyed students were positive about their
undergraduate education at Berkeley. Time-to-degree has slightly
decreased for both 4-year students and junior transfers. Changes in
mentoring and student life could improve the student experience.
BIR Chair Talley discussed the evaluation of teaching in the merit review
process for advancement (and FTE allocation), in which BIR has a role.
The difficulty of teaching large undergraduate courses is acknowledged in
the review process. Faculty are encouraged to report their advising and
mentoring activities. Although one’s focus among the three arms of the
University’s mission (teaching, research, and service) may change, Chair
Talley stated that maintaining some activity in each area would present
the strongest case for merit reviews.
Berkeley Connect Director Nolan provided an update on the program,
which facilitates undergraduate advising, and mentoring with graduate
students and faculty on an on-going basis. It is thought that small group
contact and peer-to-peer contact, rooted in the academic mission, are the
most effective means of educating undergraduate students. Mentoring can
improve student engagement and increase students’ sense of belonging.
Professor Melia presented background on Bowles Hall, a residential living
program that had been run by students in the past. A proposal to revive
Bowles Hall as a co-educational residential program has recently been
approved by the UC Regents. It is hoped this model will be successful and
expand.
During an open discussion period, suggestions for expanding and
improving the advising process were offered. A need was voiced for
12
Draft Minutes
Berkeley Division of the Academic Senate
May 1, 2014, 3:00 to 5:00 p.m.
Banatao Auditorium, Sutardja Dai Hall
Page 13 of 13
better integration of advising from different areas (faculty, colleges and
departments, and student life) so that students receive a more complete
picture. There was also concern about advising services to meet the
unique needs of international students. The BIR chair responded to a
question about summer teaching and the merit review process. COT Chair
Glynda Hull commented briefly on the committee’s work regarding the
evaluation of teaching and a peer review pilot program.
X.
New Business
None
The meeting was adjourned at 5:03 p.m.
Gary Holland
Secretary, Berkeley Division
13