Dear I am writing to respond to your request December 2016. Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust can confirm that it holds the data that you requested. 1. How many members of staff are directly employed at the Trust at present as of 15 December 2015? The Trust employees over 12352 staff 2. What was your external legal advice expenditure from 01/04/2014 to 31/03/2015? £90,679 for external legal fees in 2014-2015 3. What is your budget for external legal advice for the current financial year? Budget for Legal Fees in 2015-2016 is £214,000 4. Please provide the list of the solicitors instructed for external Legal advice from 01/04/2014 to 31/03/2015 - DAC Beachcroft LLP, Weightmans LLP, Trethowans, 5. Please provide the full structure of your legal services team Refer to attached below. 6. Please provide qualifications of the members of the legal department. Solicitor x 1, Non-practicing solicitor x 2, Legal Executive x 1, All Advisors are graduates and have additional professional qualifications 7. How many active Coroner's Inquest cases are you managing at your Trust as of 15 December 2015? 220 8. Please provide numbers of: a) Active clinical negligence claims against your Trust as of 15 December 2015 (claims reported to the NHSLA)? See (b) b) Active clinical negligence claims against your Trust as of 15 December 2015 (claims not reported to the NHSLA)? 634 open clinical negligence claims (claims data not recorded in format to readily identify reported and non-reported) c) Active Employer's Liability claims against your Trust as of 15 December 2015 (claims reported to the NHSLA)? See (d) d)active Employer's Liability claims against your Trust as of 15December 2015 (claims not reported to the NHSLA)? 47 open employers liability claims (claims data not recorded in format to readily identify reported and non-reported) e)active Public Liability claims against your Trust as of 15 December 2015 (claims reported to the NHSLA)? See (f) f)active Public Liability claims against your Trust as of 15 December 2015 (claims not reported to the NHSLA)? 10 open public liability claims (claims data not recorded in format to readily identify reported and non-reported) 9.Please attach a relevant policy and a flowchart which describes the process of how your legal services department communicates the lessons learned from the claims and coroner's inquests to the relevant teams across the Trust, to ensure the effective risk management and prevention of similar incidents and to improve care provided. Refer to Claims Management Policy below. 10. Please provide two, most recent, claims management/ legal services reports. Refer to Legal report Please note that on 1 November 2011 the Oxford Radcliffe Hospitals NHS Trust (ORH) merged with the Nuffield Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust (NOC) to form the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (OUH). Our response reflects these changes. Therefore, we consider that Oxford University Hospitals Trust has released to you all of the information that it holds in relation to your request. Internal review If you are dissatisfied with the service or response to your request you can ask for an internal review by writing to: Director of Assurance, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headley Way, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU. If you remain dissatisfied with the handling of your request or complaint, you have a right to appeal to the Information Commissioner at: The Information Commissioner's Office, Wycliffe House, Water Lane, Wilmslow, Cheshire, SK9 5AF. Telephone: 0303 123 1113 Website: www.ico.gov.uk Provision of this information does not constitute permission for its commercial re-use in terms of the Re-Use of Public Sector Information Regulations 2005. You are free to use the information for your own use, including for non-commercial research purposes. The information may also be used for the purposes of news reporting. However, any other type of re-use will require permission from the Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust. Patient safety & Clinical Risk Committee Claims and Inquests Summary Q1 of 2015/16 New Claims - April - June - 2015 1. There were 61 new claims reported. Type of Claims 1. 55 new claims were clinical negligence 2. <5new claims were occupier liability (where there is 1 reported to avoid reidentification of the patient <> are used) 3. <5 new claims were employer liability (where there is 1 reported to avoid re- identification of the patient <> are used) Grade of New Claims The CNST grading tool is used for the following claims: 1. There were 11 red claims 2. There were 37 orange claims 3. There were 13 green claims Closed Claims in Q1 of 2015/16 1. 2. 3. 4. There were 37 claims closed in 01 2016/16 Of the closed claims 22 were withdrawn and 15 settled by NHSLA The total claims settled was £1,016,573.80 The total ex gratia payments by the Trust with no admission liability was £0. Closed Red Graded Claims April- June- 2015 They were <5 closed red graded claims in 01 were standard care resulted in patient death or permanent damage (where there is 1 reported to avoid re-identification of the patient <> are used). New Inquests- April- June- 2015 1. There were 48 new inquests opened in 01 Grade of New inquests- April- June- 2015 1. Inquests are graded on probability according to the key factual root of the harm. 2. There were <5 red inquests (where there is 1 reported to avoid reIdentification of the patient <> are used) 3. There were 11 orange inquests 4. There were 34 green inquests Inquest Conclusion- April- June 2015 1. 2. 3. 4. There were 19 inquests closed by Her Majesty's Coroner Her Majesty's coroner returned 8 accidental death conclusions Her Majesty's Coroner returned <5 narrative conclusions There were <5 drug related deaths returned and <5 industrial disease related deaths (where there is 1 reported to avoid re-identification of the patient <> are used) Prevention of future Deaths Reports (Schedule 5 Regulation 28) -April -June -2015 1. There was < 5 prevention of future deaths (where there is 1 reported to avoid re-identification of the patient <> are used) 2. Training initiatives were undertaken and in place to train all junior doctors on new initiatives as per Trust policies Organisational Learning and Actions from Inquest Conclusions From the 19 heard inquests, learning and actions were identified and shared with the various divisions and tabled at the PS & CRC. There no outstanding action plans for claims or inquests feedback forms requiring assistance from divisions. Patient safety & Clinical Risk Committee Claims and Inquests Summary Q2 of 2015/16 New Claims- July, August, September 2015 1. There were 66 new claims opened in Quarter 2 Type of New Claims 2. 3. 4. There were 57 new claims - clinical negligence <5 new claims were Occupier's Liability (OL) claims relating to alleged personal injury to visitors on Trust premises (where there is 1 death reported to avoid re-identification of the patient <> are used) 5 new claims were Employer's Liability (EL) claims relating to alleged personal injury to Trust staff. Grade of New Claims 5. 6. There were 11 red graded claims There were 37 orange graded claims 7. 8. There were 18 green graded claims Claims are graded using the CNST grading tool required by the NHSLA. New Red Graded Claims- July, August, September 2015 9. There were 13 new red graded claims Closed Claims in Quarter 2 of 2015-2016 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. There were 30 claims closed in Quarter 2 of 2015-2016 Of the closed claims 25 were withdrawn 5 were settled by the NHSLA The total amount of damages for settled claims was £249,771.96. The total ex gratia payments made by the Trust with no admission of liability in Quarter 2 was £0. Closed Red Graded Claims- July, August, September 2015 15. There were 0 closed red graded claims in Quarter 2 of 2015-2016 where substandard care resulted in patient death or permanent damage. New Inquests -July, August, September 2015 16. There were 52 new inquests opened in Quarter 2 of 2015- 2016. Grades of new inquests- July, August, September 2015 17. 18. 19. 20. Inquests are graded, on the balance of probability, according to the key factual root cause of harm relating to the Trust's patient care There were <5 red graded inquests (where there is 1 reported to avoid reIdentification of the patient <> are used) There were 16 orange graded new inquests There were 34 green graded new inquests New Red-Graded Inquests -July, August, September 2015 21. There were <5 new red graded inquests in Quarter 2 (where there is 1 reported to avoid re-identification of the patient <> are used) Inquest conclusions- July, August, September 2015 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. In Quarter 2 of 2015 - 2016 Her Majesty's Coroner for Oxfordshire heard and closed 24 inquests Her Majesty's Coroner for Oxfordshire returned 5 accidental death Conclusions Her Majesty's Coroner returned 6 narrative conclusions Her Majesty's Coroner returned 5 deaths by natural causes Her Majesty's Coroner returned <5 suicides, <5 drug related death and <5 Industrial disease ((where there is 1 reported to avoid re-identification of the patient <> is used) Oxford University Hospitals Prevention of Future Death Reports (Schedule 5 Regulation 28) -July, August, September 2015 27. There was <5 Prevention of Future Death (PFD) Report under Schedule 5 Regulation 28 issued by Her Majesty's Senior Coroner for Oxfordshire in Quarter 2 (where there is 1 reported to avoid re-identification of the patient <> are used). Organisational Learning and Actions from Inquest Conclusions 28. From the 24 heard inquests in Quarter 2 organisational learning and actions were identified in <5 closed inquests ((where there is 1 reported to avoid reidentification of the patient <> is used) Outstanding Action Plans in Claim and Inquest Feedback Forms There are no outstanding action plans for Claims or Inquests Feedback Forms requiring assistance from the Divisions Claims Management Policy Category: Summary: Policy Policy governing the management of all clinical negligence, personal injury (staff and third party) and property expenses claims that arise on Trust premises or involve Trust staff elsewhere while on official NHS Trust business. Equality Impact Assessment Undertaken: August 2011 Valid From: 21 June 2012 Date of Next Review: 30 June 2015 Approval Date/ Via: Distribution: 20th June 2012 via Clinical Governance Committee Via Legal Services Department to: Divisional Directors, General Managers and Divisional Nurses Safety Quality & Risk Intranet Site Oxford University Hospitals Related Documents: Being Open Policy Conduct-Disciplinary Action Procedure External Reviews Policy Health Records Management Policy Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy Information Governance Policy Management of Patient Comments, Concerns and Complaints Policy and Procedure Record Retention Policy Author(s): Head of Legal Services Further Information: Head of Legal Services Safety, Quality & Risk Intranet Site This Document replaces: Claims Policy, v 7.0 August 2011 Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Lead Director: Chief Nurse Issue Date: 21st June 2012 Page 1 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Contents Page Introduction……………………………………………………………………………....... 3 Policy Statement…………………………………………………………………….......... 3 Scope………………………………………………………………………………….......... 3 Aim…………………………………………………………………………………………... 4 Definitions………………………………………………………………………………….. 5 Responsibilities…………………………………………….……………………………... 5 Chief Executive ……………………………………………………………………… 5 Chief Nurse and Medical Director…………………………………………………. 5 Director of Assurance……………………………………………………………….. 5 Head of Clinical Governance …………………………………………………....... 5 Divisional Directors………………………………………………………………….. 5 General Managers and Divisional Nurses………………………………………... 5 Head of Legal Services ………………………………………………………......... 5 Legal Advisors…………………………………………………………………......... 6 Head of Financial Accounting ……………………………………………………... 7 Matrons/ Clinical Leads/ Heads of Department/ Operational Managers/ General Managers………………………………………………………………….. 7 Individual Staff……………………………………………………………………….. 7 Organisational Arrangements…………………………………………………….......... 7 Principles and Objectives of Claims Management…………………………….… 9 Aggregation & Analysis…………………………………………………………….. 11 Learning Lessons from Claims and Inquests………………………………….… 11 Training……………………………………………………………………………………... 14 Monitoring Compliance……………………………….……………………………….… 14 Review…………………………………………………………………………………….… 16 References……….……………………………………………………………………....... 16 Equality Impact Assessment………………………………………………………….… 16 Document history……………………………………………………………………….… Appendix 1: Clinical Negligence Claims Pre Action Protocol………………………… 16 Appendix 2: Personal Injury Claims Pre Action Protocol……………………………… 18 Appendix 3: Civil Procedure Action Steps……………………………………………… 19 Appendix 4: Claim/Inquest Feedback Form……………………………………………. 20 Appendix 5: Protocol for Delegated Authority CNST Claims Purpose…………….... 21 Appendix 6: Potential Litigation Communication Group (Women’s Centre)………... 28 Appendix 7: Procedure for Supporting Staff Following an Adverse Incident, Claim or Complaint…. 29 Appendix 8: Procedure for learning from incidents, complaints and claims………… 33 Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 17 Page 2 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Introduction 1. This policy covers all clinical negligence, personal injury (staff and third party) and property expenses claims that arise against the Trust on Trust premises or involve Trust staff elsewhere while on official NHS Trust business. 2. NHS organisations are indemnified against different types of claims through membership of various risk pooling schemes. The Trust is a member of the Schemes as set out below. These are managed by the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) and include: 3. 2.1. The Existing Liabilities Scheme (ELS) for all clinical negligence claims arising before 1 April 1995; 2.2. The Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST) for all clinical negligence claims arising since 1 April 1995; 2.3. The Risk Pooling Schemes for Trusts (RPST) for all non-clinical claims arising since 1 April 1999. RPST is the collective term for two schemes: 2.4. Liabilities to Third Parties Scheme (LTPS) for all public and employers’ liability claims 2.5. Property Expenses Scheme (PES) for loss or damage to Trust property. The Trust is liable for claims that arise from events since its establishment on 1 April 1994. South Central Strategic Health Authority is liable for claims that arise from events prior to 31 March 1994. Policy statement 4. The Trust is committed to ensuring that legal claims are managed in a proactive, timely and effective manner. 5. The Trust will handle claims in accordance with protocols and reporting guidelines as set down by the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA), the Pre-Action Protocol for the Resolution of Clinical Disputes, the Pre-Action Protocol for Personal Injury Claims; the Civil Procedure Rules as updated and amended and linked Trust Policies. 6. The Legal Services Department has Delegated Authority from the NHSLA to manage and settle clinical negligence claims up to £25,000 (excluding defendant and claimant costs), although the Trust may choose not to exercise this Delegated Authority, depending upon constraints on available resources. For clinical negligence claims out with Delegated Authority, the Trust’s Legal Services Department reports as required to the NHSLA in accordance with the CNST and ELS schemes. 7. The Trust recognises that such effective and timely claims management is a fundamental tool of risk management, the aim of which is to collect information about claims and to use NHSLA Solicitors’ Risk Management Reports on Claims which will help to facilitate wider organisational learning. See Appendix 8 Procedure for learning from incidents, complaints and claims. 8. All claims will be thoroughly investigated regardless of the claimant’s age, disability, ethnicity, gender, religion, beliefs or sexual orientation. 9. No claimant will be discriminated against. Scope This document applies to all areas of the Trust, and all employees of the Trust, including individuals employed by a third party, by external contractors, as voluntary workers, as students, as locums or as agency staff. Claims Management Policy Page 3 of 35 Version 8.0 – June 2012 10. Oxford University Hospitals 11. This policy and the procedures and protocols contained herein apply to requests for the disclosure of records, made in contemplation of legal action against the Trust; clinical negligence claims; personal injury claims, incorporating employer’s liability and public liability matters, property expenses claims; and inquests. Aim 12. This policy sets out a framework of the principles of good claims management to ensure consistently high standards across all professional groups. 13. The aims of the policy are to ensure that: 13.1. The Trust complies with legislation, Civil Procedure Rules, Pre-Action Protocols and NHSLA Reporting Guidelines as set down under the Clinical Negligence Scheme for Trusts (CNST) and the Risk Pooling Scheme for Trusts (RPST). 13.2. Where appropriate a Root Cause Analysis of an incident is undertaken in order to identify what happened, how and why it happened, and thereafter, to analyse the issues and problems, and develop recommendations to help prevent or reduce the likelihood of another incident or recurrence 13.3. Lessons are learnt from claims to improve overall practice, patient care, and the safety of staff and patients. 13.4. Claims are managed in a proactive, timely and effective manner with due regard to legislation, Civil Procedure Rules; Pre-Action Protocols; and the NHSLA Member Rules and Reporting Guidelines under the CNST and RPST. 13.5. Thorough investigations are conducted in line with the principles set out in the Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy. This is in a methodical and consistent manner to ensure justified actions are settled efficiently, and unjustified claims are defended robustly. This approach to claims follows the recommendations of the NHSLA and Department of Health to achieve best possible practice and to act in the interest of both the patient and the NHS. 13.6. Trust Staff responsible for the management of claims are given training in investigation and root cause analysis, in line with the Trust training needs analysis. 13.7. Trust Staff are aware of their responsibilities as Trust employees, and of the inquest procedure, claims procedure and claims management process as they may be required to be involved in investigations and provide witness evidence. 13.8. Sufficient advice, guidance and support are provided to Trust Staff involved in investigations and providing witness evidence. See Appendix 7 for Supporting Staff guidance. 13.9. Trust Staff are supported throughout the claims process, particularly if the investigation is linked to a traumatic or stressful incident. 13.10. External organisations are appropriately involved in claims in accordance with the External Accreditation and Inspection Policy. 13.11. During the course of a claim, risk management issues are identified, monitored and managed in accordance with the Risk Management Strategy. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 4 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Definitions 14. The terms in use in this document are defined as follows: 14.1. A claim is defined as an allegation of negligence and/or a demand for compensation made following a complaint, an adverse clinical incident or an accident resulting in personal injury, or incident involving property/buildings. It includes any clinical incident that carries a significant litigation risk to the Trust. 14.2. A claim can include a complaint leading to a claim, notification of a Serious Adverse Event or Incident Report generated by Risk Management processes which represent a significant litigation risk, and request for the disclosure of health care records. 14.3. All potential clinical negligence cases must be reported to the NHSLA. The identification of a potential case may follow an inquest, complaint investigation, clinical incident/internal investigation or receipt of a Disclosure Request or Letter of Claim. Responsibilities 15. The Chief Executive has overall responsibility for quality and safety, including the proper management and resolution of claims. 16. The Chief Nurse and Medical Director have delegated overall responsibility for ensuring that the Trust has appropriate systems in place for assessing, reporting and managing risk. There is a joint executive responsibility, with the Medical Director, for Clinical Governance and to implement and manage systems for Risk Management (see Risk Management Strategy). As such, they should be briefed of any incident, risk management issues, serious untoward incident, never event, complaint, claim (clinical or non-clinical) or inquest that is likely to significantly impact on the Trust. 17. The Director of Assurance has delegated authority for the assurance of systems to ensure effective risk management within the Trust. 18. The Head of Clinical Governance has responsibility for developing all aspects of clinical governance including appropriate strategies, policies and systems. 19. Divisional Directors are responsible for ensuring that the Claims Management Policy is implemented throughout their Division. 20. General Managers and Divisional Nurses are responsible for notifying the Head of Legal Services of adverse incidents and complaints which are likely to be the subject of a claim. They are responsible for giving due consideration to the need for appropriate professional support of staff involved in a claim; and for providing or facilitating such professional support as may appropriately be required, wherever possible. 21. The Head of Legal Services is responsible for: 21.1. Ensuring that risk is reduced through the effective management of claims in line with this policy and the dissemination of information arising from claims and investigations. S/he will monitor the application of this policy and provide monthly reports for the Clinical Risk Management Committee (CRMC); q u a r t e r l y integrated report with Risk and Complaints on Organisational Learning and Trends to Clinical Governance Committee; Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 5 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals annual report on claims and inquests to the Clinical Governance Committee and annual report on Coroners’ Rule 43 Letters to Clinical Governance Committee. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 6 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals 21.2. Ensuring that any present or former Trust staff member who may be adversely affected by either an adverse incident linked to a claim, the claims process itself, or an inquest receives support during the claim or inquest and in the long term, if necessary. 21.3. Providing advice to the Chief Executive and Directors in relation to claims management and reducing the risk of litigation. 21.4. Ensuring a coordinated case management approach is achieved between the Risk Management Department, the Complaints Department and the Legal Services Department in the investigation and reporting of cases, liaison with service delivery areas of the Trust; aggregated analysis and the implementation and monitoring of action plans. 21.5. Ensuring that claims management is integrated within clinical governance processes within the Trust so that action plans arising from claims investigations and NHSLA Solicitors’ Risk Management Reports are created and monitored in line with Trust standards. 21.6. The day to day running of the Legal Services Department. 21.7. Ensuring a proactive, timely and effective investigation of all claims in accordance with the Civil Procedure Rules, Pre-Action Protocols and NHSLA Reporting Guidelines. 21.8. Providing authority for admissions, responses, defences, settlement terms and offers for claims. 21.9. Maintaining the Safeguard Claims Database, ensuring integrity of data stored and used, in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Information Governance Policy. 21.10. Signing routine legal documents relating to claims including List of Documents, Consent Orders and Defences. 21.11. Conducting periodical audits of case files to ensure compliance with this policy, the Civil Procedure Rules, the Pre-Action Protocols and the NHSLA Reporting Guidelines; and taking necessary action to address any deficiencies, and monitoring the effectiveness of those actions. 21.12. Supervising the investigation of claims and providing advice and recommendations to the Legal Advisors and Trust Staff as required or necessary. 21.13. Providing advice and support to staff in the Legal Services Department and Trust Staff involved in claims or inquests. 22. Legal Advisors are responsible for: 22.1. Conducting proactive, timely and effective investigations into clinical and non- clinical claims in accordance with this Policy, Civil Procedure Rules, Pre-Action Protocols and NHS Reporting Guidelines. 22.2. Reporting the findings of investigations, liability and quantum to the Head of Legal Services and undertaking appropriate referrals for admissions, responses, defences, settlement terms and offers for claims and signing of official documents relating to claims. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 7 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals 22.3. Co-ordinating and collating statements and requests for information by the Coroner in respect of Inquests in a timely and effective manner. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 8 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals 22.4. Maintaining the Safeguard Claims Database and ensuring the integrity of data stored and used, in accordance with the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Information Governance Policy. 22.5. Informing the Head of Legal Services of any present or former Trust staff member who may have been adversely affected by either any adverse incident linked to a claim, or by the claims process itself, or inquest. 23. The Head of Financial Accounting is responsible for the reporting and handling of any property claims to the NHSLA under the Property Expenses Scheme. 24. Matrons/ Clinical Leads/ Heads of Department/ Operational Managers/ General Managers should ensure an investigation is undertaken as and when an incident occurs which requires referral to the Risk Management Department, or which may give rise to a complaint or claim against the Trust. 25. Individual staff are responsible for: 26. 25.1. Adhering to the procedures set down in this policy. 25.2. Referring to appropriate Matron/Clinical Lead/Heads of Department/Operational Manager/General Manager as soon as they are aware of any incident which may give rise to a complaint or claim against the Trust. 25.3. Assisting with the claims investigations and provide a response to requests for statements, comments and opinion within the time frame specified in correspondence from the Legal Services Department, so as to endure the Trust’s compliance with time scales set down by legislation, Civil Procedure Rules, Pre- Action Protocols and NHS Reporting Guidelines. Staff should refrain from providing opinion and comment to patients or their families regarding any legal liabilities of the Trust or indicate that compensation should be paid. Organisational Arrangements Trust Position on Records Management 27. Effective health care records management is integral to effective risk management, primarily since effective systems to ensure clinical staff have access to patients’ health care records, have been shown to reduce clinical risk. Health care records are also critical evidence in defending claims. 28. All health care records, x-rays, imaging, scans, and cardiotocography (CTGs) traces should be retained in accordance with the Health Records Management Policy. 29. Health care records should be clear and legible. Detailed notes are of significant importance to the claims investigation and can provide the basis for a robust defence. 30. Disclosable documents should be factual in content and avoid opinion or criticism. The documents can include complete health care records prepared a parts of a patient’s care and treatment; incident reports, root cause analysis reports and complaints responses. 31. Claims, complaints and incident investigation documents should not be stored in the patient’s health care records so as to ensure that clinical treatment is recorded separately and kept discrete from the claim, incident or complaint investigation Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 9 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals processes. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 10 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Letters of Apology 32. Trust Policy is to encourage openness and honesty with patients and families where there has been an adverse outcome and when appropriate to offer apologies, explanations and expressions of sympathy (see NHSLA Circular Number 02/02 Apologies and Explanations and the Being Open Policy). 33. Letters of Apology from the Medical Director are addressed to the Claimant or their family. Whilst every effort must be made to convey the apology to the Claimant or their family the letter should remain distinct from the legal claim. See the Being Open Policy. Statement/Report Writing 34. When Trust Staff are asked by the Legal Services Department to provide their written comments or report for a potential or actual claim, such documents are not disclosable to the claimant or their representatives, as their primary purpose is to assist the claims investigation. 35. Any response to a request from the Legal Services Department should specifically state that it has been prepared in response to an actual or contemplated/potential claim. 36. It is advisable that staff preparing comments or reports should retain a copy of their final document for their records. 37. Written comments or reports for a potential or actual claim should not be filed in the patient’s health care records and must be stored separately and securely in accordance with the Information Governance Policy. 38. Trust Staff should refer to the Legal Services Department directly for advice or the Safety Quality & Risk intranet site for guidance on How to Write a Statement. 39. If, during the course of a claim, a formal statement is required, Trust Staff will be assisted by the Legal Services Department and/or the NHSLA Panel Solicitors for the Trust. Documentation: Legal Privilege 40. Any documents created specifically for use in a potential or actual claim, or specifically for the purpose of seeking or obtaining legal advice, are protected by litigation and legal professional privilege. Such documents will be used by the Legal Services Department and/or the Trust's legal advisors but will not necessarily be disclosed to third parties. 41. Any correspondence or documents produced specifically for the purposes of litigation must not be filed in patient's health care records. 42. Due regard will be paid to the confidentiality of claims data relating to patients, Trust staff and third parties. The NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) 43. The NHS Litigation Authority is a Special Health Authority, responsible for handling negligence claims made against NHS bodies. The main functions of the NHSLA include administering schemes under which NHS bodies pool their clinical and non-clinical negligence liabilities, promoting high standards of risk management in the NHS, administering the risk management standards for non- Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 11 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals clinical liabilities, the provision of an information service for the NHS on Human Rights case law and advice and assistance to NHS bodies when handling equal pay litigation. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 12 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals 44. In addition to managing clinical and non-clinical claims against NHS organisations, the NHSLA has a responsibility to promote good risk management in the NHS. 45. The costs of the NHSLA schemes are met by membership contributions. The projected claim costs are assessed in advance each year by a professional actuary. Membership contributions are then calculated to meet the total forecast of expenditure for that year. Individual member contribution levels are influenced by a range of factors, including the type of Trust, the clinical specialties, the relevant NHSLA Risk Management Standards and those with a good claims history. 46. The NHSLA retains a panel of solicitors to represent the interests of the Trust and the NHSLA. 47. When a claim is issued against the Trust, it remains the named legal defendant. However, the NHSLA assumes responsibility for handling the claim and meets the associated costs. 48. Timescales for reporting to the NHSLA are to be found in Appendices 2, 3, 4 and 5. Principles and Objectives of Claims Management 49. Trust Staff need to be supported during the investigation process and to be advised of the developments and the progress of a claim. For further guidance see Appendix 7, Procedure for supporting staff following an adverse incident, claim or complaint. 50. Trust Staff undertake best endeavours to carry out their work in a safe and effective manner with due regard to patients and others and the avoidance of risks or hazards. 51. In the event of an adverse outcome or incident, and in line with the Being Open Policy, it is imperative that communication with the patient and others is consistent and honest. 52. An investigation following an adverse outcome or incident will address system failures as well as individual accountability, if applicable, and the results of these investigations will ensure lessons are learnt and safer practice is implemented locally, organisationally, and if appropriate within the local health community. Investigation 53. The Head of Legal Services, and all Legal Advisors, shall undertake timely and thorough investigation of allegations of clinical negligence, or staff and third party personal injury. The level of investigation undertaken will be determined by the severity of the event, and by reference to the CNST, RPST and PES Reporting Guidelines. In every case, a prompt Preliminary Assessment will be prepared detailing the merits of the claim; including recommendations for risk management implications and reference to action plans to reduce future risks, monitoring and lessons that can be learnt for the future given structured analysis of the events in question. 54. When undertaking their investigation, members of the Legal Services Department shall consult fully and with all due sensitivity with clinical, managerial and executive staff directly involved in the claim, and provide support to staff as Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 13 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals appropriate. 55. When undertaking investigation, members of the Legal Services Department shall endeavour to identify what have been the principal causal factors in accordance with the principles of root cause analysis for a red incident as defined in the Trust’s Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy, with a view to facilitating wider organisational learning. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 14 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals 56. The Head of Clinical Risk will liaise with the Legal Advisors on any investigations of claims that have previously been reported as incidents in accordance with the Trust’s Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy 57. The Complaints Operational Manager will liaise with the Legal Advisors for the investigation of any claims that have previously been reported as complaints, in accordance with the Trust’s Complaints Policy. Management, settlement and disposal of claims 58. 59. The Head of Legal Services, and all Legal Advisors, shall manage all claims in accordance with the CNST and RPST Guidelines, the Clinical Negligence Claims Pre- Action Protocol (Appendix 1), the Personal Injury Pre-Action Protocol (Appendix 2) and in compliance with the Civil Procedure Rules (Appendix 3). The Safeguard Claims Management System will be utilised by the Legal Services Department to ensure compliance and to ensure that claims are reviewed so as to effect proactive, timely and effective case management. In particular, they shall ensure: 58.1. prompt settlement of claims where an admission of liability is indicated; 58.2. repudiation of claims where there is no indication of negligence as currently defined in English law; 58.3. working in co-operation with the NHSLA and its appointed CNST and RPST panel solicitors under the Protocol For Delegated Authority; 58.4. working in co-operation with the NHSLA and its appointed CNST and RPST Panel Solicitors to obtain approval as required in respect of the management of claims falling out with Delegated Authority; 58.5. working in co-operation with the Trust’s Head of Financial Accounting and the NHSLA to refer at the earliest indication of a Property Expenses Scheme (PES) claim regarding theft or damage to Trust Property to the Head of Financial Accounting, who will report the claim if it exceeds the excess of £20,000 to the NHSLA together with relevant documentation and communicate with stakeholders as necessary to ensure the claim is concluded any claim below this level would be the Trusts liability. Key actions for PES claims are opening a file, instigating an investigation within 5 days of notifications of the loss or damage; once the report is compiled, notifying the Head of Financial Accounting (for claims that fall below excess level) or Director of Finance within 5 working days and once the decision has been made (by the Head of Financial Accounting) to pursue a claim, informing the NHSLA of this decision within 5 working days. 59.1. considering alternative means of dispute resolution (other than litigation) as appropriate; and learning from claims by making changes in clinical and organisational practice and procedure and facilitating education of staff as appropriate. Delegated Authority 60. Delegated Authority will only be granted by the NHSLA to named individuals, following compliance with its protocol. The exercise of Delegated Authority is subject to audit by the NHSLA, and the Trust may choose not to exercise same, depending upon constraints on resources. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 15 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Aggregation & Analysis 61. The Legal Services Database Administrator will provide data for the regular claims reports and quarterly overviews for the Trust Board as required. 62. Other reports can be provided on request submitted to the Head of Legal Services. 63. The Clinical Risk Management Committee [“CRMC”] helps executives, managers and clinicians review and manage incidents, complaints and claims. 64. Analysis of aggregated data on all claims and inquests will be submitted to CRMC, for aggregated analysis along with data on all serious incidents, complaints, and referrals to the Parliamentary Ombudsman or to the Care Quality Commission. 65. The aggregated data considered and reviewed by CRMC on a monthly basis will include the following breakdown: 66. 67. 65.1. total number of serious incidents reported within each division, including a summarised action plan in respect of those incidents graded ‘red’; 65.2. total number of serious complaints received within each division, including a summarised action plan in respect of those complaints graded ‘red’; 65.3. total number of claims and inquests received within each division, including a summary of the allegations received, and investigation undertaken to date; 65.4. A summary of any referrals to the Parliamentary Health Service Ombudsman. The CRMC meets on a monthly basis. In reviewing the aggregated data as stipulated above, it will: 66.1. monitor whether serious incidents, complaints, claims and inquests are being managed effectively; specifically, monitoring the development and delivery of action plans as appropriate; 66.2. identify any apparent trends, or clusters; and 66.3. Determine whether there are any underlying issues which may need to be addressed, relating to the delivery of care/staff safety and welfare. Given the particularly high level of potential financial liability in the area of obstetric care, the functions of the CRMC in relation to obstetric incidents, complaints and claims will be supplemented by the operation of a dedicated sub-group, the Women’s Centre Potential Litigation Communications Group, see Appendix 6. Learning Lessons from Claims and Inquests 68. The Trust is committed to ensuring that Risk Management issues are identified and lessons arising from clinical negligence and personal injury claims and inquests are identified, and necessary remedial action is taken to prevent or minimise the recurrence of the risk and to improve practice. 69. Action Plans based on Risk Management issues and lessons arising from claims will be developed, implemented and monitored in the Claim/Inquest Feedback Form (Appendix 4) By the Divisions and by CRMC, to effectively improve practice. 70. Any recommendations or actions issued by HM Coroners under Rule 43 of the Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 16 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Coroners Rules will be handled in accordance with the Trust Policy on External Accreditation and Investigation. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 17 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals 71. An aggregate analysis of outcomes will be reported in the monthly report to CRMC; quarterly reports to the Clinical Governance Committee on behalf of the Board of Directors and in the annual audit return to the NHSLA of Panel Solicitor’s Risk Management Reports. 72. Claim/Inquest Feedback Forms will be completed by Legal Advisors at the conclusion of each claim and copied to the Lead Consultant, the appropriate Divisional Manager(s), the Head of Clinical Risk, the Safety Risk Manager and Divisional Risk and Governance Coordinators, to identify the outcome of the claim/inquest and any organisational, clinical or other risk management lessons to be learned. 73. At the settlement or closure of a claim, the Claim/Inquest Feedback Form together with the associated NHSLA Solicitor’s Risk Management Report, will be tabled at CRMC for its consideration, and any wider dissemination as appropriate, and recommendations actioned. 74. The Claim/Inquest Feedback Form be tabled at CRMC until there is written assurance that the Action Plan has been completed by the Division. 75. The Head of Legal Services and all Legal Advisors, with the support of the CRMC, shall identify lessons to be learned; both specific to the area in which the claim has arisen, and across the organisation. If there are any lessons which may be relevant to other health care organisations, the Head of Legal Services shall notify the NHSLA as appropriate, and may liaise with the Head of Clinical Governance to determine whether notification to an external agency is appropriate. 76. Dissemination of the lessons learned throughout the organisation shall be through feedback from the Divisional Risk and Governance Coordinators to the lead clinicians, matrons, divisional managers or via the Trust Clinical Risk Management Committee or Health and Safety Committee, where appropriate. 77. The Head of Legal Services and Legal Advisors will support Divisions in the development of an action plan for the delivery of any appropriate risk reduction measures identified. The development and delivery of such action plans will be monitored by CRMC. Where possible and appropriate, in accordance with the Trust’s Risk Management Strategy, local management should initiate implementation of appropriate risk reduction measures identified. In all cases, consideration should be given to whether a risk has been identified which should be referred for inclusion in the relevant risk register. 78. Aggregation, analysis and learning from incidents, complaints, claims and inquests will also occur in accordance with Appendix 8. How the organisation communicates with relevant stakeholders 79. At the outset of a claim, Legal Advisors will notify the appropriate Trust Staff and Divisional Managers of any allegations received, and will keep them informed of any significant developments as the investigation proceeds. 80. Legal Advisors will identify any other individuals with whom it may be appropriate that they communicate during the conduct of their investigation, within or out with the Trust, and shall ensure that they are kept informed as appropriate. 81. Reference to external organisations may be necessary following an adverse incident, complaint or claim. The following list of external organisations is not exhaustive: Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 18 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals • NHSLA Panel Solicitors • HM Coroner Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 19 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals • GP/GP Surgeries • Health and Safety Executive • National Patient Safety Agency • NHSLA • Primary Care Trusts, NHS Trusts • Police • Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Authority • Social Services (including Child Protection Services) • Supervisory Authority for Deprivation Of Liberty (DOLs) Liaison with Risk Management 82. When a serious incident is under investigation and a claim or inquest is received relating to the same event, then the Head of Legal Services will liaise with the Head of Clinical Risk or the Safety Risk Manager as appropriate, to ensure that the issues will be handled in accordance with both the Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy, and the Claims Management Policy. 83. If during the management of a claim, it becomes clear that the issues raised require investigation in accordance with the Trust's Serious Incident Procedure, then the Head of Legal Services will inform the Head of Clinical Risk or the Safety Risk Manager as appropriate. They will decide whether to investigate under the Serious Incident Procedure, in liaison with the Medical Director, Chief Nurse or the Head of Clinical Governance. The Head of Clinical Governance will decide if an appropriate external agency needs to be informed. 84. If health and safety issues are identified through management of a claim, and the matter has not previously been reported, the Safety Risk Manager will investigate the matter and if necessary report it to the Health and Safety Executive. Interface with Complaints Policy and Procedure 85. In accordance with the Parliamentary and Health Service Ombudsman’s Principles for remedy1, there is a range of appropriate responses to a complaint that is upheld, and these may include financial as well as non-financial remedies. Appropriate consideration will be given to the full range of remedies that may be offered to compensate for injustice and hardship where a complaint of poor service or maladministration is upheld. 86. In particular, if a complaint includes an allegation of clinical negligence or a request for compensation, or if it is identified as a significant litigation risk, then the Head of Legal Services, in liaison with the Complaints Operational Manager and relevant Divisional Managers, will consider how best to address the issues raised, and will determine the most appropriate means of delivering any redress due. Publicity and Liaison with Media & Communications Team 87. At the earliest indication of any media interest a brief synopsis of the circumstances of the case and present position should be provided to the Head of Media & Communications by email. The Media & Communications Team may request further information or specifics regarding the case, which will be provided by the Legal Advisor. 88. A pre-inquest and post-inquest brief will be circulated by Legal Advisors to the Executive Team, Divisional Managers and Media & Communications which will contain information Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 13 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals 1 Ref http://www.ombudsman.org.uk/improving services/principles/remedy/index.html Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 13 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals about the inquest, post mortem, issues raised by the family and likely media attention. Where required a media statement will be prepared for press release. 89. Where claims are likely to generate media interest, the NHSLA will liaise with the Trust to agree the content of a press release. Performance and Conduct Policy and Procedures 90. If a decision is taken to instigate the Conduct-Disciplinary Action Procedure following the receipt of a claim, the investigation of the civil claim will continue irrespective of the disciplinary action. Divisional Managers should seek advice from Human Resources regarding disciplinary procedures. 91. The Medical Director and Chief Nurse will report to the General Medical Council (GMC) and Nursing and Midwifery Council (NMC) in suspected cases of gross professional negligence where appropriate. 92. In cases of criminal misconduct the police will be informed. Training 93. Claims are only investigated by the Trust’s Head of Legal Services and Legal Advisors, for which they have specialist training. This is role specific training (not part of statutory, mandatory and essential training). Monitoring Compliance 94. The Trust Board has overall responsibility for ensuring that the claims management system is working effectively. 95. The Clinical Risk Management Committee (CRMC) will have operational responsibility for monitoring the effectiveness of claims management. 96. The Head of Legal Services will conduct regular file reviews with the Legal Advisors, to monitor the effectiveness of each Legal Advisor’s individual performance. 97. Information about claims, stored on the Legal Services Safeguard Claims Database, will be subject to regular interrogation and review by the Head of Legal Services 98. The Trust is subject to audit by the NHSLA generally, to check compliance with the protocols and reporting guidelines as set down by the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA) and the Civil Procedure Rules (see Appendices 1, 2 and 3). Any NHSLA audit will take place in accordance with the Trust’s Policy on External Accreditation and Inspection. 99. The Trust is further subject to audit by the NHSLA specifically to monitor the exercise of Delegated Authority. 100. Key monitoring arrangements are outlined in the table overleaf. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 14 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Measurable Policy Objective Monitoring/Audit Method Duties To be addressed by the monitoring activities below. Claims will be managed and recorded in Trust Safeguard Litigation Database System Retrospective random audit of claims files and Safeguard Database System Annually Head of Legal Services Clinical Risk Management Committee Risk Issues arising from litigation recorded in local, Divisional Corporate Risk Registers Retrospective review of Risk Registers Annually Divisions or Head of Clinical Governance Clinical Risk Management Committee Compliance with time scales for investigation and Preliminary Analysis Report Retrospective random audit of time scales Annually Head of Legal Services Clinical Risk Management Committee NHSLA schemes relevant to the organisation (i.e. CNST, LTPS and PES) Review of policy and membership Annually Head of Legal Services Clinical Risk Management Committee The action to be taken, including timescales Audit of cases Annually Head of Legal Services Clinical Risk Management Committee Communication with relevant stakeholders Audit of cases Annually Head of Legal Services Clinical Risk Management Committee Investigation and analysis of incidents, complaints, claims and inquests (including aggregation). Monitoring of this process will occur in line with the Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy. Learning from and implementing changes as a result of incidents, complaints, claims and inquests including implementation of risk reduction measures. Monitoring of this process will occur in line with the Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy. Supporting staff involved in an incident, complaint, claim or inquest. Monitoring of this process will occur in line with the Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy. Claims Investigation Training This is not applicable for Claims since investigations are only undertaken by the Head of Legal Services and Legal Advisors. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Frequency of Monitoring Responsibility for performing the monitoring Responsibility for review of monitoring report Page 15 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Appendix 3: Civil Procedure Action Steps CLAIMANT ISSUES CLAIM FORM Within 4 months SERVE CLAIM FORM AND PARTICULARS OF CLAIM SERVE CLAIM FORM OR Within 14 days (and no later than 4 months after issue of claim form) SERVE PARTICULARS OF CLAIM Within 7 days FILE AT COURT DEFENDANT Within 14 days of service FILE AND SERVE DEFENCE OR FILE ACKNOW LEDGEMENT OF SERVICE Within 14 days, extension by agreement limited to 28 days otherwise Application to Court FILE AND SERVE DEFENCE COURT OFFICE SEND OUT ALLOCATION QUESTIONNAIRE TO BOTH PARTIES ON FILING OF DEFENCE CLAIM ANT AND DEFENDANT Within time specified by Court COURT OFFICE Small Track (up to £5,000) Otherwise according to Standard Civil Procedure Rules *Standard Directions *Service of documents 14 days before hearing Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 REPLY TO ALLOCATION QUESTIONNAIRE (AND CLAIMANT FILE REPLY TO STATEMENT OF DEFENCE IF DESIRED) TRACK ALLOCATION Fast Track (£5,000 - £15,000 Multi Track (above £15,000) * Standard directions * Standard disclosure, exchange witness statements, joint expert * Listing questionnaire *One day trial within 30 weeks of allocation to track *Case management conference pro-active management by Judge *Special Directions *Listing questionnaire *Pre-trial review *Trial Page 19 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Appendix 4: Claim/Inquest Feedback Form Legal Services, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust Claim Reference: NHSLA Reference: Trust: Division: Clinical Area: Claim Summary: Outcome Incident Date: Complaint made: Incident Report Form: SIRI: Settlement/Closed Date: Cost of Claim Damages Claimant costs Defendant Costs CRU Amount Paid by Trust: Reason for Outcome Risk Management Lessons Division Action Action: Responsibility: Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Evidence: Date Completed: Page 20 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Appendix 5: Protocol for Delegated Authority CNST Claims Purpose 1. This document sets out the process by which delegated authority can be requested from the NHS Litigation Authority (NHSLA). Trusts are not obliged to seek a delegated authority, although many may, particularly those with experienced claims managers in post. 2. For the avoidance of doubt, a delegated authority will only be granted following compliance with the pre-audit procedure and audit visit and only then to nominated individuals within the Trust. 3. In the event of a delegated authority being granted, the Trust will need to utilise the services of their own internal auditors to provide verification that acceptable practice continues to exist or alternatively submit to further audit visits by the NHSLA. An audit checklist for use by internal auditors appears as Annex 4. General Principles 4. The audit process breaks down into two stages. Pre-audit requirements 5. Annex 1 sets out the areas within which the NHSLA will need to be satisfied prior to a visit to the Trust. 6. The pre-audit requirements break down into two distinct areas: 6.1. The personnel involved in the claims unit within the Trust, their experience and qualifications. 6.2. The protocols for the investigation of cases and handling interest from exterior parties (local or national media for example) and the administrative support systems (information technology and liaison with other administrative areas within the Trust). 7. The letter of support required from the Trust Chief Executive or Director of Finance is a free format letter wherein a positive recommendation must be made and attention can be drawn to any features of the unit by way of systems or personnel which the Trust consider to be of particular value to the NHSLA. 8. Upon satisfactory compliance with the pre-audit documentation, the NHSLA will audit a selection of ten cases referred to the Authority by the Trust against the criteria set out in annex 2. 9. The criteria concentrate on proactive claims handling and seek reassurance on the quality and timeliness of investigation, decision making on breach of duty and causation and active quantum assessment and resolution (if appropriate). Audit Visit 10. Annex 3 shows a sample NHSLA audit form which will be completed in respect of files reviewed during a visit to the Trust claims unit. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 21 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals 11. Each category is scored on a scale of 1 to 5 as follows: 5 = Excellent Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 22 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals 4 = Good 3 = Satisfactory 2 = Poor 1 = Very Poor 12. The minimum acceptable score is 21 out of a possible 35 for each file audited. Decision/Appeal 13. The NHSLA will produce an analysis of the audit exercise with a recommendation for the granting of a delegated authority. In the event of a request for delegated authority being denied, reasons for the denial will be provided. 14. Should the Trust wish to appeal the decision of the audit exercise, appeals will be to the Chief Executive of the NHSLA whose decision as Accountable Officer for all clinical negligence claims within the NHS in England will be final. Reporting 15. In the event of a delegated authority being granted, Trusts must continue to notify the NHSLA of circumstances and claims as detailed in the CNST Reporting Guidelines. Those Trusts granted delegated authority will also be required to prepare a quarterly update of all claims subject to the delegation. Exclusions 16. The NHSLA will continue to handle all claims (regardless of value) where there is involvement: • Of a Member of Parliament • Allegations or pleadings alleging breaches of the Human Rights Act • The case is one of a number of similar cases or part of a Group Litigation Order. • For Provisional Damages • Any claim which could be constituted as novel, contentious or repercussive. Defence Solicitors 17. Authority will be required from the Litigation Authority before solicitors are instructed on behalf of the Defendants. 18. If a claim should become subject of legal proceedings, the file must immediately be forwarded to the Litigation Authority to assume conduct of the matter. Payments 19. All payments, irrespective of type or value will be made by the Litigation Authority. 20. The form found at Annex 5 should be used for this purpose. Follow-up Audits 21. The NHSLA reserves the right to audit any Trust with a delegated authority at any time. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 23 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals 22. Trusts are expected to seek independent verification of the pre-audit requirements annually and Annex 4 provides a local auditors checklist. 23. Should you have any queries or wish to discuss an application for delegated authority with the NHSLA please refer all queries to the NHS Litigation Authority. Annex 1: Documentary Evidence Required to Meet Pre-Audit Criteria 24. This documentation should be forwarded to the CNST Scheme Manager, when the Trust feels it is ready to apply for Delegated Authority. • Evidence of achievement of Level 1 CNST Risk Management Standards. This would assure the NHSLA of clinical reporting systems etc. • Time Claims Manager in post (minimum requirement - 6 months) • CV for individual(s) proposed • Job description • Evidence of new claims process i.e. post system within Trust, registration system, allocation of new claims (where applicable), response times, system for disclosure of records etc. • Investigation protocol • Diary system • Internal Claims Committee • Evidence of relationship with local Claimant Solicitors/community • Use of information technology, particularly claims management system • Evidence of support team i.e. medical records, admin etc. • Policy for dealing with serial offenders/multi-party actions • Trust media policy • Evidence of keeping up to date with changes in law, training etc. • Evidence of proactive local claims handling over past 6 months, to include sample successful settlements/repudiations • Evidence of liaison between claims and risk management • Letter of support from Chief Executive/Director of Finance Annex 2: Pre-Audit Sample Criteria 25. Upon satisfactory compliance of pre-audit documentation, an audit of 10 files, selected at random referred to the Authority, will be undertaken. Criteria to be considered: Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 24 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals • Notification of new claims. Timely, in line with CNST Reporting Guidelines, enclosures etc. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 25 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals • Preliminary analysis. Quality, investigations, quantum assessment etc. • Ongoing input into claims management with the NHSLA Case Manager, communication etc. • Proactivity • Factual/expert witness management • CRU • FRS12 data • Quantum assessment/settlement negotiation Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 24 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Annex 3: NHSLA Claim Audit Form (for use when visiting Trust Claims offices) NHSLA Claim Number _ Defence Solicitors (if appointed) _ Office (if more than one) Trust Case Manager 1. _ Please score the following factors from nil to five: Communication Score Includes prompt and systematic reporting to NHSLA; use of the telephone where necessary; sensible tone. 2. Investigation Identification of key issues and prompt/thorough pursuit of them; appropriate and timely liaison with CRU; avoidance of unnecessary minor points. 3. W itness Management Proper management of both expert and lay witnesses. 4. Proactivity Is the case being managed “hard and fast”? Effective use of diary and negotiation> Shelflife of file. 5. FRS12 Data Accuracy. Prompt reassessment as required. 6. Administration/File Management Is file handled at the right level? Evidence of supervision and review; file presentation; Management of costs. 7. Quantum Negotiation/Settlement Early quantification and negotiation TOTAL SCORE: (out of 35) _ Comments (especially regarding very high or low scores) Audited By Date Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 _ _ Page 25 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Annex 4: Auditors’ Checklist Evidence of the following procedures/practices is required: • Cases logged within IT system. • Cases reviewed not less than quarterly. • Establishment and maintenance of FRS12 data. • System for reporting to NHSLA. • System for payment requests from NHSLA. • Risk management feedback within the Trust. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 26 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Annex 5: Payment form TO: NHSLA – FAX NO: FROM: PAYMENT REQUEST DELEGATED AUTHORITY CLAIM NO: We have agreed an interim/settlement of Claimant’s damages/costs. We have received a Disbursement Invoice for ………………………….. Attached is correspondence confirming the position Please forward a cheque to: PAYEE Addressee: Address: Ref: Date Required: Sign Print Date For NHSLA only Signed………………………………………………… …. Name………………………………………………… …... Date…………………………………………………… Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 27 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals …. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 28 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Appendix Centre) 6: Potential Litigation Communication Group (Women’s Terms of Reference Membership Chairman: Legal Advisor for Children’s & W omen’s Division Members: Perinatal Risk Co-ordinator Frequency of Meetings: Monthly Role and Purpose To highlight any incidents taken place in the Women’s Centre, which may result in future litigation. To enable Legal Services Department to take steps in preparing evidence as close in time to the incident as possible to maximise accuracy. To highlight information of interest to other parties i.e. health and safety and non-clinical risk where appropriate, in the prevention of future litigation. Any notes taken of these meetings will attract legal/professional privilege. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 29 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Appendix 7: Procedure for Supporting Staff Following an Adverse Incident, Claim or Complaint Introduction 1. Research shows that healthcare staff who are involved in incidents, complaints, inquests or claims have an increased probability of being traumatised by the event both professionally and on a personal level. Incidents for the purpose of this process are any event or circumstance arising that could have or did lead to unintended or unexpected harm, loss or damage, fire, theft, violence, abuse, accidents, ill health, infection, near misses and hazards and may be identified through an incident, complaint or claim. 2. Therefore, it is important that the Trust recognises this and has systems in place that support staff to reduce the effects of these often traumatic events, and in doing this, it is hoped that it will reduce the incidences of stress related sickness. The number of incidents, complaints, inquests and claims is unfortunately on the increase meaning that staff are more likely than ever to encounter an experience that may cause distress. 3. The Trust believes in a fair and just culture, one in which staff feel supported and cared for. 4. For the purposes of this guidance the term ‘incident’ encompasses incidents, complaints and claims. Duties 5. Depending on the category of investigation to be undertaken, the responsibility of accessing the effects of an incident on an individual(s) will be different. 6. The main aim is that an individual asked to investigate an incident, claim, inquest or complaint ensures that as part of this investigation a review of how staff involved are coping is undertaken and noted within the records of the investigation and to advise staff, what support is available or make appropriate arrangements for the member of staff. 7. Initial support may be required when the incident occurs or when the claim or complaint is received however, consideration should also be given to providing support in the intermediate and long-term. Support may be required on an ad-hoc basis as events unfold or may need to be continuous depending on the needs of the staff member. Managers 8. After an incident has occurred or a claim or complaint received it may be necessary to provide support for any of the staff involved. It will be the role of the line manager to be alert to those factors, and make the necessary arrangements to support the member of staff in the short and longer term. Operational Site Managers 9. Out of normal working hours and at weekends or bank holidays the Operational Site mangers will assess whether any individual(s) involved in an incident need support and in what form. The Duty Executive on call should also make sure that this Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 30 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals has been assessed. Serious Incident Investigation Team 10. The welfare of any staff involved in a serious incident must be considered particularly in relation to psychological trauma or stress. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 31 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals 11. The SIRI investigation team as part of their investigation should make sure that all staff involved in the incident, are aware of the support available within the Trust. This should form part of the records of the SIRI. Trust Staff 12. Stress can have adverse effects on both mental and physical wellbeing leading to illness anxiety and feelings of inability to cope. An individual’s response to stress is dependent on various factors, including personal and health problems that may impact on the work situation. The individual has responsibility to inform their manager if they feel that following the incident they are no longer able to continue in their present role this may only be temporary and support should be given for this request. Individuals must not feel a failure in not being able to continue. 13. Employees of the Trust have a responsibility to support their colleagues who have been involved in an incident. Not just at the time of the incident but thereafter. Staff involved in incidents must not feel that they are victims of the incident and suffer any harassment or bullying from colleagues. Immediate support offered to staff (internally and if necessary externally) 14. Being involved in a serious incident, inquest, claim and complaint can precipitate stress and anxiety and can lead to a loss of confidence. The trust has a duty to support staff through this period. 15. Immediately following a serious incident or inquest or following receipt of a claim or complaint the lead of the investigation with the support of the line manager will need to assess whether the individual(s) involved are able to continue in their role. It is sometimes good practice to offer some time off. Staying in the area where the incident happened can add to the individuals stress. It may be that by just taking them off their present duties and doing another task will be sufficient. 16. Debriefs and line management support can be a very effective way of helping staff cope with the effects of the incident. The person facilitating this should be an experienced senior member of staff who has good communication and interpersonal skills, de-briefs can be one-to-one or for a group of staff. 17. Following any incident, inquest, claim or complaint the line manager should provide or ensure that staff are aware of the options available to support them through the consequences of the incident, this may include all or some of the following: Debrief discussion with the manager Pastoral support from the Trust team Time to meet their mentor or another colleague for support Self-referral to GP Professional body or Union How to access the confidential support and counselling available to all Trust staff. Working in an alternative area Time off/special leave. 18. For further advice and support the manager can contact the Occupational Health team, Human Resources or the Trust’s Risk Management Team. Any support provided to an individual should be documented and a record kept in their personal folder held by their department manager. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 32 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Intermediate and Ongoing support offered to staff (internally and if necessary externally) 19. Support is often given immediately after an incident but staff may be affected by the incident for a long time afterwards and intermediate and ongoing support should be provided (in the same way as paragraph 17 above). It is important that the support given is not a one-off and staff can be offered on-going or further ad-hoc support as required to help them regain their confidence. 20. It may be appropriate to arrange a period of supervised practice, undertake some additional training or possible relocation to another area whilst the individual regains their confidence. Careful monitoring of the situation must be put in place by an identified member of staff or other that the individual has access to. A record of any actions taken must be recorded by the line manager in the staff member’s personal file held locally. Action for managers or individuals to take if the staff member is experiencing difficulties associated with the event. 21. If an individual is not performing as well as prior to the incident, inquest, claim or complaint managers should first consider revisiting the principles outlined in paragraphs 13-17. If the situation persists, advice can be sought from the HR department. Staff can be referred to Occupational Health for an assessment of their fitness to practice. It will be necessary for there to be evidence within the staff member’s personal file held by their manager detailing support given/ offered to date and information concerning the difficulties that the staff member has experienced. Occupational Health and GP Support 22. The role of Occupational Health is to provide specialist support to staff who self-refer or to those who are referred by their line managers due to concerns about their wellbeing and their fitness to work. Staff members should also be informed that they can self- refer and obtain support from their GP. Further information and guidance on stress is available within the “Policy on the Prevention and Management of Occupational Stress”. 23. If a member of staff is referred to Occupational Health for support it will be necessary for a record of and reason for this referral to be kept within the staff member’s file. Occupational health records are confidential and any support offered by occupational health will remain confidential. Advice available to staff in the event of their being called as a witness (internally and if necessary externally) 24. Staff may be asked to give their comments or in some cases a written statement on an incident, inquest, claim or complaint in order for the Trust to undertake a robust investigation. Guidance on this can be obtained from Legal Services or the Risk Management Department. Individuals may approach their own professional body or union for advice and support during this process. 25. Being a witness in either a Court of law or at an inquest can be a very frightening experience. The Trust Legal Services Department not only offers advice on how to prepare witness statements but also supports the member of staff by meeting with them prior to a Court appearance and attending the Court with them. Advice for staff being call as witnesses is available from the Legal Department on or on the intranet under Clinical Governance there is written detailed guidance on the following: Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 33 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Checklist for witness statements Checklist for witness statements for the Coroner Writing a witness statement Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 34 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals NPSA Decision Tree 35. In cases where an employees practice or decision making may be in question the Incident Decision Tree can be a useful tool to objectively decide on an individual’s level of involvement (see Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy). The tool when followed should lead those using it to a conclusion about whether the incident occurred as a result of individual failure or systems failure. In general there is usually more than one outcome when using this tool and it is advised that this exercise is carried out by more than one party. Other relevant documentation 36. Policy on the Prevention and Management of Occupational Stress. 37. Harassment and Bullying Policy 38. Writing a W itness Statement Legal Services Stable Block JR Monitoring Compliance 39. The monitoring arrangements for this procedure are outlined within the Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 35 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals Appendix 8: Procedure for Learning from Incidents, Complaints and Claims Introduction 1. The Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust (OUH) is committed to learning from untoward incidents, claims and complaints and has a robust process in place to enable the organisation to maximise learning for the future and reduce the likelihood of recurrence, thus improving the safety for patients, staff, visitors and contractors. 2. This appendix supports the detailed guidance on the investigation of incidents, claims and complaints outlined within the relevant policies to which this appendix is attached. Identification and implementation of changes in practice as a result of individual incidents, complaints and claims 3. All incidents, claims and complaints will be reviewed and action plans agreed locally by the relevant Clinical Service Unit, Directorate, Division, Clinical Governance/Risk Forums. Results of investigations into red and orange incidents, claims and complaints must be reviewed and action plans agreed with the senior Divisional team. 4. The divisions (or equivalent Senior Managers within non-clinical services) are responsible for the implementation of changes to practice and reviewing action plans arising from investigations, and for ensuring that Risk Management, Complaints and Legal Services are informed of all actions implemented. Process for aggregation and presentation of reports 5. The Head of Clinical Risk, the Head of Legal Services Department and the Complaints Operational Manager will be responsible for collating the qualitative and quantitative data required for a combined quarterly report of incidents, complaints and claims for each of their areas. This is presented to the Clinical Risk Management Committee on a monthly basis. Details of content is described in paragraphs 65-70 of the Claims Management Policy. 6. An aggregated report for the Trust is produced by the Safety; Quality and Risk team for review by the Clinical Governance Committee will be presented by the Head of Clinical Risk on a quarterly basis to the clinical Governance Committee. 7. The aggregated report will contain both qualitative and quantitative analysis including numbers of incidents, complaints and claims, key themes and trends, the grading of incidents and claims, performance relating to response times for complaints, a Divisional breakdown of where the complaints, claims and incidents occurred together with examples of actions taken as a result of incidents, complaints and claims. 8. The report will be available to all members of the Clinical Governance Committee and it is the responsibility of the Divisional representatives to communicate relevant information back to the Divisions. 9. An annual review of the minutes from the Clinical Governance Committee with regard to the frequency of the aggregated reports, together with a review of Divisional minutes will be completed by the Safety, Quality and Risk team. 10. An annual audit of the content of the aggregated report will be completed by the Safety, Quality and Risk team to ensure the minimum quantitative and qualitative analysis is incorporated. 11. Divisional quality reports are presented monthly by the Divisions to the Clinical Governance Committee for review. The reports include reactive risk data and illustrate incident, complaints, claims and inquest reporting. Particular reference is made in Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 36 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals the reports to cases graded red and orange which have been investigated using Root Cause Analysis Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 37 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals techniques, t o g e t h e r w i t h t r e n d a n a l y s i s h i g h l i g h t i n g e m e r g i n g t h e m e s . The C l i n i c a l Governance Committee may request further monitoring or reporting by the Divisions. 12. The reports produced by the Divisions are cascaded further throughout the relevant Directorates. Local staff managers are then responsible for ensuring that staff are made aware of required changes to practice shared through these reports. 13. A quarterly report detailing incident, complaints and claims activity across the organisation will be submitted to the Quality Committee. Maximising learning 14. The Trust is keen to maximise learning that results in changes in organisational practice through the sharing of lessons resulting from incidents, claims and complaints and their subsequent investigation findings and will liaise with partners such as contacts in commissioning PCTs, partner organisations and other relevant bodies such as the Strategic Health Authority (SHA), Health and Safety Executive (HSE), National Patient Safety Committee (NPSA), The Care Quality Commission (CQC) and the Department of Health (DoH). 15. Representatives from the PCT and the Trust’s Private Finance Initiative (PFI) Carillion attend monthly and quarterly Clinical Governance Committee and Health and Safety Meetings. Incidents reported and the outcome and learning from investigations is presented and discussed to ensure that learning is communicated. 16. The Trust is represented at various regional Patient Safety Forums hosted by the SHA. Data is shared on work undertaken on projects designed to target specific risk related issues. 17. Work is undertaken with health and safety forums outside the organisation such as LOXANG (London, Oxford, Anglian) Regional Risk Managers Forum and the Cherwell Health and Safety Forum. These groups receive information about incident rates, sharing best practice from local investigations and local and national initiatives. 18. Serious Health and Safety incidents are reported to and learning shared with the HSE via the RIDDOR database. This data is aggregated and forms the basis of national health and safety informing safety initiatives. The same process occurs for all patient safety incidents occurring with the Trust. These incidents are reported to the NPSA national Reporting and Learning database. Trends in reporting are then feedback to the Trust via quarterly reports and recommendations acted upon. This process is overseen by the PCT. 19. All red incidents requiring investigation are reported on the STEIS database administered by the SHA. The SHA use the data and learning generated from incidents that are reported to inform future patient safety work or take immediate action where an incident poses immediate regional risk. 20. The quarterly report produced by the Safety, Quality and Risk department highlights both local and organisational learning with regard to incidents, complaints and claims. The representatives from the Divisions communicate relevant information back to the Divisions. 21. The Divisional quality papers prepared by the Divisions and presented to the Clinical Governance Committee incorporate lessons learnt from incidents, complaints and claims within Divisions. The representatives from the Divisions communicate relevant information back to the Divisions. 22. The Clinical Risk Management meeting attended by representatives from the safety, Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 38 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals quality and risk Department and the Divisions identifies key areas for organisational learning. An ‘at a glance’ summary is produced from this meeting that captures key areas of organisational learning. The representatives from the Divisions communicate relevant information back to the Divisions. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 39 of 35 Oxford University Hospitals 23. Risk issues arising from incidents, claims and complaints will be also recorded on the appropriate Risk Register. This will normally be the local register. The management of risks identified on risk registers will occur according to the Trust risk management processes (see the Trust Risk Management Strategy and supporting procedures), thus promoting further changes in practice. 24. The process for implementing risk reduction measures as outlined in the incident reporting policy and the risk management strategy and supporting documents. 25. An annual audit relating to local and organisational learning of the quarterly report from the Clinical Governance Committee and the Divisional reports will be completed by the Safety, Quality and Risk team. 26. An annual audit of the minutes of the Clinical Risk Management meeting minutes and the at a glance document for organisational learning to be completed by the Safety, Quality and Risk team. Monitoring Compliance 27. The monitoring arrangements for this procedure are outlined within the Incident Reporting and Investigation Policy. Claims Management Policy Version 8.0 – June 2012 Page 40 of 35