Measuring Consumer Access to Medication Information Online AcademyHealth Annual Research Meeting Sarah J. Shoemaker, PhD, PharmD June 28, 2010 Background • There have been advances in the availability of Personal ), which are available via health care Health Records ((PHRs), providers, health care systems or independent platforms. • California Healthcare Foundation national survey of 1,849 adults found that 7% have used a PHR [1] • However, the extent to which people access and use medication information in PHRs is unknown • In order to measure impact of PHRs on outcomes, must first assess: – the extent to which patients have access to PHRs, – whether various functionalities are offered on PHRs PHRs, and – the degree to which consumers use these functionalities. Abt Associates Objective • Support of AHRQ's Measurement of Health IT progress • Measurement Objective – To develop and field a survey to obtain a national estimate of the number of U.S. adults who have access to their medication information online. • We did not field the survey • Therefore, this presentation will: – Describe the process used to develop the survey – Cog Cognitive t e testing test g results esu ts – Conceptual issues that had to be addressed Abt Associates Next Steps: Consumer Access to their Medication Information Online Adoption Setting N/A (Public) and Technology of Interest Online medication records (personal health records) Abt Associates Use// U Meaningful Use Operational definition Operational definition # of U.S. Adults who have used a patient portal or PHR to obtain online info about their prescribed medications Use of various functionalities of online medication records (e.g. refills, check drug-drug interactions, etc.) Data Source Data Source Develop or expand existing survey Develop or expand existing survey Analysis Method Analysis Method Sample proportions adjusted for sampling weights & nonresponse Averages adjusted for non-response plus p arithmetic simple Outcomes Operational definition Medication errors TBD Data Source Secondary data Medical records A l i M Analysis Method th d TBD Survey Development Process • Construct clarification • Determine survey domains • Developp surveyy items for each domain • Cognitively test survey with adults • Revise survey items based on cognitive testing • Field Fi ld survey Abt Associates Construct Clarification • Original Measure: The proportion of persons in the U.S. who can access their medication information online online. – Persons: Any adult (over age 18) residing in the United States. States – Access: availability and use (of patient portal or PHR) – Medication Information: A personal record the patient has access to that contains the past and present prescribed medications. (Synonyms: medication list or medication record). • Medication: prescription medication or a medication that has been prescribed Abt Associates Construct Clarification • Online: via a patient portal or personal health record accessed remotely through an electronic device with internet or intranet access (e.g., computer, PDA, Smartphone). – Patient p portal: An internet or intranet site that offers p patients services such as Web links to reliable sources of medical information, and the ability to make appointments, obtain managed care referrals, and request medication renewals.”[2] renewals. [2] – Personal health record (PHR): Electronic summaries of a patient’s medical record that are often portable and easily accessed by the patient.”[3] • Operational Definition: Definition The n number mber of U U.S. S ad adults lts who ho have used a patient portal or PHR to obtain information online about their past or present prescribed medications medications. Abt Associates Survey Domains • PHR or patient portal – A Availability il bilit i) IInternet t t and d ii) PHR or patient ti t portal t l – Use – Functionality (e.g., schedule appointment) – Source ((i.e., who maintains the PHR/portal) p ) • Medication therapy information – Availability – Use – Functionality (e.g., refills, check drug-drug interactions, etc.) • Respondent socio-demographics Abt Associates Survey Design • Survey Attributes – Mode: telephone random-digit dial (RDD) – Languages: English and Spanish – Length: 10-minutes – Domains: 3 – Items: 14 items Abt Associates Cognitive Testing • Cognitive testing was performed to assess: – how well respondents understood each question as intended – how readily they could recall relevant information – whether they could use that information to come up with an answer – whether they could report that answer in the format required by the questionnaire • Two T rounds d off cognitive iti testing t ti with ith 16 di diverse patients ti t Abt Associates Cognitive Testing Participants Round 1 Round 2 Total 6 2 6 2 12 4 46 26 65 26-65 42 27 56 27-56 44 26 65 26-65 Education More than high school High school or less 2 6 5 3 7 9 Race/ethnicity Non-Hispanic White Non-Hispanic Black Hispanic 3 3 2 3 2 3 6 5 5 Gender Male Female 3 5 5 3 8 8 PHR or p patient p portal access PHR only Portal only PHR and portal None 0 4 2 2 1 3 3 1 1 7 5 3 8 8 16 Primary language E li h English Spanish Age Mean age A Age range N Abt Associates Issues Identified & Solutions Proposed • Survey Question: Do you have access to an on-line on line record of your personal health information? Yes No Don't know • Cognitive Testing Finding: – When asked this qquestion,, several women defined the term as including their personal information plus their family members’. • Solution: Clarified in a statement before the survey question that we were only asking about the respondent's information and not his/her family's information. Abt Associates Issues Identified & Solutions Proposed • Survey Question: Does your online health record include information about the medications you are currently taking or have been prescribed? Yes No Don't know I don don’tt take medications or have never taken medications • Cognitive Testing Findings: – There is no one accepted term to refer to online records that might include medication information. – Wording needs to include patient entering information. • Solution (revised Q): Is there a place in your on-line on line personal health record for information about the medications prescribed for you? Abt Associates Issues Identified & Solutions Proposed • Survey Question: Which of the following people or organizations maintain this on-line on line record for you? Please answer yes or no for each of the following: Your doctor, nurse or other health care provider Your health plan or health insurance company Your employer Your Y pharmacy h Other (please specify) • Cognitive Testing Findings: – Respondents thought government agency should be included. – Respondents were alarmed by employer as an option. • Solution: S l ti Add d ""governmentt agency"" & removed Added d ""employer" l " options ti Abt Associates Issues Identified & Solutions Proposed • Survey Question: In several survey questions we referred to "on-line on line record" record • Cognitive Testing Findings for Spanish-speakers: – While "record" is recognized by younger persons, "expediente" is recognized by older persons. – Also, "en línea" (online) is used primarily by younger persons • Solutions: – Used "record or expediente” – Replaced “en línea” by “en el internet” (on the internet), which is an older term recognized by younger and older persons. Abt Associates Discussion • Our two rounds of cognitive testing results demonstrate: – challenges for respondents to understand certain Health IT terms (e.g., on-line record) – difficulty of surveying respondents on a HIT technology that many of them have not seen or used (e.g., PHRs) – importance of using different terms for different languages to ensure comprehension and cultural appropriateness – importance of thoughtfully assessing respondents’ understanding and interpretation of Health IT in consumer surveys. surveys Abt Associates Implications for Health IT Measurement • While it is critical to assess the outcomes of HIT like PHRs, we first must understand and measure the extent PHRs to which consumers have access to and use these technologies. • We have demonstrated,, from our experience, p , that in order to obtain valid & reliable estimates of HIT adoption & use: – Carefullyy clarifyy constructs since manyy HIT constructs are likely to be interpreted differently – Cognitive g testing g with consumers is valuable to clarify y the understanding and interpretation of specific items Abt Associates Abt Associates References 1. California Healthcare Foundation (April 2010). Consumers and Health Information Technology: A National Survey 2. Weingart SN, Rind D, Tofias Z, Sands DZ. (2006). Who uses the patient ti t internet i t t portal? t l? The Th PatientSite P ti tSit Experience. E i JA Am M Med d IInform f Assoc. 13(1):91-95. 3. Endsley et al. An introduction to personal health records. Family Practice Management, May 2006;57-62. Abt Associates