Achieving Health Equity for Sexual Minorities AcademyHealth 2009 Annual Research Meeting

Achieving Health Equity for

Sexual Minorities

AcademyHealth

2009 Annual Research Meeting

June 29, 2009

Judith Bradford, PhD

Co-Chair, The Fenway Institute

Director, Center for Population Research in LGBT Health

2

Populations are groups of people who have certain characteristics in common. Traditionally, a

“population” is made up of people who live within a defined geographic area; and population research refers to data sets that adequately represent the population of interest, using randomized samples.

Increasingly, we think of populations (or population groups) as people who have certain cultural or behavioral characteristics in common. (Such as sexual and gender minorities). Range of qualitative and quantitative methods are used to develop representative samples.

3

4

5

Why the Increase?

 Larger portions of lesbians, gay men, and bisexuals may be choosing to couple with partners of the same sex.

 Larger numbers of same-sex couples may be willing to report the nature of their relationship to the Census Bureau.

6

How Many LGBs? NSFG 2002

“Do you think of yourself as heterosexual, homosexual, bisexual or something else?”

Men:

Heterosexual:

* Homosexual:

* Bisexual:

90%

2.3

1.8

Something else: 3.9

No answer: 1.8

* Total 4.1%

Women:

Heterosexual:

*Homosexual:

* Bisexual:

92%

1.3

2.8

Something else: 3.8

No answer: 1.8

* Total 4.1%

7

National Agenda for LGBT Health

Equity

8

9

How our health suffers:

Leading Health Indicators in the General US Population

Healthy People 2010 (US Surgeon General’s Office)

Physical Activity

Overweight and Obesity

Tobacco Use

Substance Abuse

Responsible Sexual Behavior

Mental Health

Injury and Violence

Environmental Quality

Immunization

Access to Care

Sexual and

Gender

Minorities

10

Ah ha!

In order to receive funding for LGBT research and services, we had to demonstrate need.

In order to demonstrate need, we had to make our case with sound data.

In order to get the data, we had to solve both political and scientific challenges.

To gain recognition, we had to strengthen ties across organizations, maximize our institutional and intellectual resources.

A full-court press was needed.

11

Critical Building Blocks

 Institute of Medicine report on lesbian health and research priorities (1997-1999) funded by CDC and

ORWH (NIH)

 Short paper

 White paper

 Persons defined by sexual orientation included as a disparities group in HP2010

 LGBT Community Health Centers broadened focus from

AIDS to LGBT health

 Incorporation of health concerns in LGBT community centers and other community-based programs

 National Coalition on LGBT Health (lgbthealth.net)

12

Coalition’s Initial Concerns

 HP2010 companion document

 Inclusion of sexual orientation measures in

Federal surveys

 Expanding coalition membership and diversity

 Communication within LGBT communities and with government agencies

 Representation on federal committees and advisory groups

 Consensus-building for advocacy efforts

13

Population Data Sets for LGBT Health?

 Population data with adequate samples of sexual and gender minorities is lacking.

 Measurement issues, samples too small to represent diversity.

 Measures utterly lacking, as for transgender.

 Reliance on national surveys as prevalence benchmarks for sexual and gender minorities is insufficient.

 Progress is being made, much left to do.

A review and description of data sets with measures of sexual orientation (LGB) or attitudes toward sexual minorities can be found at: www.gaydata.org

(regularly updated)

14

Population-based Studies with LGBT

Samples

1. Massachusetts BRFSS

2. Virginia Transgender Health Study

3. California Tobacco Survey

4. American Community Survey

15

Massachusetts BRFSS – Pooled

Data (Selected Findings)

 Substantial disparities for LGBs v. HETS, many bisexual rates higher than LGs

 Access to care, self-reported health status, anxiety, depression, suicide ideation, smoking, binge drinking, illicit drug use, sexual assault victimization, intimate partner violence, disability, obesity, heart disease

 E.g., gays and lesbians 2.5 times more likely than hets to report current smoking.

 Lesbians 2.2 times more likely than het women to be obese.

 Many disparities greater for bisexuals than LGs

 Bisexuals 3.1 times more likely than hets to report feeling tense or worried

 Bisexuals 4.4 times more likely than hets to report “poor” or “fair” health (LGs 1.5 times more likely).

16

Smoking (California Tobacco Survey)

 Gay men smoke at rates 50% higher than other men.

 Lesbians smoke at rates almost 70% higher than other women.

 LGBT women smoke at rates almost 200 percent higher than other women.

 9% of heterosexual female adolescents were smokers v. 42% of lesbian/bi female adolescents.

 8% of heterosexual adolescent males v. 17% of

“mostly heterosexual” males.

17

How do we explain these differences?

Social Determinants of Health

 Social organization, stress and health

 Early life

 The life course, the social gradient, and health

 Understanding the health consequences of unemployment

 Health and the psychosocial environment at work

 Social support and social cohesion

 Poverty, social exclusion and minorities

 Social patterning of individual health behaviors: the case of cigarette smoking

Marmot M, Wilkinson RG, Social Determinants of Health. NYC: Oxford University Press, 2003.

18

Summary of Census 2000 Data

Related to People of Color in Same-Sex Relationships

Gary J. Gates, Ph.D., the Williams Institute at UCLA School of Law

 “The number of same-sex couples is generally even across races.

 LG couples of color have equivalent education and income disparities as in their referent racial/ethnic groups.

 Disability rates are higher among LG couples of color, as they are for referent racial/ethnic groups.

 LG couples of color are more likely to be raising children than are White LG groups.

 Almost 30 percent of same-sex Black/African American male couples have a child in their household, versus 8 percent of same-sex White male couples.”

19

Using Geographically Coded Maps

(Gates)

 Black/African American and Latino/Hispanic same-sex couples cluster in distinct geographical areas, in different areas than White same-sex couples.

 Highest density same-sex couple neighborhoods are most like those where White same-sex couples live.

 Thus, same-sex couples of color will likely be underrepresented in research conducted in high-density

LGBT neighborhoods.

 Need attention to neighborhoods with higher clusters of same-sex couples of color.

20

Virginia Transgender Health Survey -

Sampling Challenges and Methods

 Population-based methods not feasible.

 Strong desire for representative sample – geographic regions and both gender vectors.

 Careful formative research, statewide, regional focus groups.

 Web-based survey, posted on comprehensive mix of websites and list servs.

 Regional network to distribute hard copy questionnaires.

 $15 incentive, blank money orders sent to name and address given by respondent.

 N=350 in analysis sample.

21

Survey Response Mode

140

(40%)

210

(60%)

Web

Paper

22

Response Mode X Region

30

20

10

0

60

50

40

90

80

70

90

10

Northern

32

68

Eastern

66

Central

34

85

15

61

39

Western Statewide

Web

Paper

23

Response Mode Differences

Paper

 58% African American; 28% white; 10% Hispanic

 56% urban, 28% suburban,

16% rural

 38% no health insurance

 23% not out to regular doc

 19% own their homes

 34% live alone

 6% live with spouse

Web

 3% African American; 85% white; 9% multiracial

 34% urban, 48% suburban,

19% rural

 21% no health insurance

 33% not out to regular doc

 40% own homes

 25% live alone

 22% live with spouse

LGBT Health is Not Just an Individual Matter

24

McElroy KR, Bibeau D, Steckler A, Glanz . An ecological perspective on health promotion programs. Health Education Quarterly 15:351-377, 1988.

25

A More Integrated Framework for LGBT Health

Greater awareness of and attention to demographic and cultural diversity within LGBT communities

More awareness of common concerns, such as measurement and methodological issues

More expansive, inclusive way of thinking, demonstrating increasing confidence

More balanced emphasis on all sexual and gender minorities - national policy frameworks apply to all

Focus on more rapid translation of research to practice

Increased understanding and focus on population-based data

26

27

References

 www.gaydata.org

 http://www.law.ucla.edu/williamsinstitute/home.html

 Gates GJ. 2006. Same-sex Couples and the Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual

Population: New Estimates from the American Community Survey . The

Williams Institute on Sexual Orientation Law and Public Policy, UCLA School of Law. (presented at national mtg, in next reference)

 Lesbians, Gays, Bisexuals, and Transgenders of Color Sampling Methodology:

Strategies for Collecting Data in Small, Hidden, or Hard-to-Reach Groups to

Reduce Tobacco-Related Health Disparities. Fall 2006 Meeting. (contact

Bradford if needed)

 Virginia Transgender Health Initiative Survey. Virginia Department of Health,

Department of Disease Prevention. http://www.vdh.virginia.gov/epidemiology/DiseasePrevention/documents/pdf/T

HISFINALREPORTVol1.pdf

 Healthy People 2010: Companion Document for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and

Transgender (LGBT) Health. http://www.lgbthealth.net/downloads/hp2010doc.pdf

28

Contact:

Judy Bradford, jbradford@fenwayhealth.org

(c) 804-304-2667

(o) 617-927-6015