PAYING FOR PERFORMANCE In PUBLIC HEALTH: Opportunities and Obstacles

advertisement

PAYING FOR PERFORMANCE

In PUBLIC HEALTH:

Opportunities and Obstacles

Glen P. Mays, Ph.D., M.P.H.

Department of Health Policy and Administration

UAMS College of Public Health

P4P in Health Care

Use of financial incentives to improve quality, efficiency, productivity

Not a new concept, but new applications are emerging post- managed care

Considerable experimentation by insurers, purchasers, providers

Considerable variation in methods

– Target populations

– Performance measures and criteria

– Type and strength of incentives

Why Consider P4P in Public Health

Wide variation in the performance of essential public health services

Persistent disparities in population health outcomes

Gaps in adoption of evidence-based public health interventions

Growing demands for accountability

P4P in Health Care

Inter-organizational

– Insurer contracts with hospitals & physicians

– Employer or government contracts with insurers

Intra-organizational

– Hospital compensation for employed physicians, nurses, other health professionals

– Medical group compensation for individual members

Potential Effects of Incentives

Improvement effects

– Service quality

– Cost/efficiency

– Service volume, output, productivity

Selection Effects

– Attract “better” providers, staff

– Attract a “better” patient population

Potential Advantages of Incentives

Align incentives of purchaser and provider

Promote accountability

Reduce need to monitor inputs/effort

Potential Disadvantages of Incentives

Higher payments required to attract risk-averse providers

Distortion of service mix away from activities not measured, rewarded

Reinforcement of disparities between high and low performing providers

Creation of stressful work environments that may reduce job satisfaction, increase turn-over

Design of Performance Incentives

Basing payments on health outcomes is problematic:

– Exogenous & random variation in outcomes

– Noisy measures

– Attribution

Alternatives: base pay on processes or outputs

– Adherence to evidence-based practices

– Service volume

– Cost

Challenges in Design and Implementation

Finding valid, reliable, relevant measures

Data availability and quality

Securing buy-in of providers

Finding “new dollars” for sufficiently strong incentives

Reducing opportunities for gaming

Unique Challenges for Public Health

Limited availability of off-the-shelf measures

Inflexible, categorical funding streams

Public-sector purchasing, hiring, compensation rules

Many areas of shared accountability

– Local and state agencies

– Public and private providers

– Individual and population health interventions

Time horizon for implementation and impact of community-based interventions

Building Blocks for Public Health P4P

Existing Performance Measurement Sets

– National PH Performance Standards

– State measurement sets

Available now

Process measures

Self-assessed

Attribution and accountability issues

? Linkage to desired outcomes

Building Blocks for Public Health P4P

Existing Population Health Measures

– Vital records: mortality and birth outcomes

– Notifiable disease surveillance data

Available now

Linkage to desired outcomes

Attribution and accountability issues

Time horizon

Building Blocks for Public Health P4P

Measures of Guideline Adherence

– Guide to Community Preventive Services

– Guide to Clinical Preventive Services

– Tobacco Control Program Guidelines

Guidelines available now

? Existing data on guideline adherence

Linkage to desired outcomes

Attribution and accountability issues

? Time horizon

Incentive Design Issues

Use of existing public health funding streams?

Handling pass-through funding?

Reward quality targets or quality improvement?

Economic feasibility: do rewards to offset the cost of improvement?

Include incentives and penalties?

Measurement Issues

Types of measures: structural, processes, outcomes

Risk adjusting performance measures for community need?

Including population/community perceptions of service?

Getting from Here to There

Small scale demonstrations and pilots

Engage the practice community in design, implementation, and evaluation

Use start-up strategies that reward measurement and reporting

Phase in gradually to avoid large-scale shifts in resources

Download