Variation in Volume-Outcome
Relationships for Hospitals and
Surgeons Performing CABG Surgery
Christopher P. Gorton MD, MHSA
Jayne L. Jones MPH
Christopher S. Hollenbeak PhD
David B. Campbell MD
Diane L. Arke MS
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council
Research Objectives:
To describe the variation in risk-adjusted outcomes for individual surgeons and hospitals with similar case volumes
To examine the association between case volume and two outcomes, 30-day mortality rates and 7-day readmission rates, for surgeons and hospitals
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council
Methods
Isolated CABG surgeries, 2002:
16,435 patients; 62 non-federal Pennsylvania hospitals; 190 surgeons
Retrospective analysis of administrative and medical record abstracted data reflecting statewide experience. Generalized estimating equations (GEE) framework used to account for the correlations between patients treated by the same surgeons and at the same hospital.
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council
Principal Findings
Wide variation was seen between and within outcome measures at all volume levels
Extreme mortality observations were demonstrated across the entire volume spectrum.
Likelihood of patient death within thirty days decreased as surgeon case volume increased
(adjusted risk ratio [RR] for each 25 case increment, 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI],
0.87-0.99; P=0.031).
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council
Regression Coefficients
Outcome Measure
Hospital Case Volume Surgeon Case Volume
Model Parameters
Initial
Model
30-day
Mortality
7-day
Readmission
30-day
Mortality
7-day
Readmission
Coefficient -0.001 0.000 -0.003 -0.002 p-value 0.0706 0.3099 0.0314 0.0967
Revised
Model
Coefficient -0.001 p-value 0.0708
0.000
0.3047
-0.004
0.0045
-0.002
0.0424
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council
Hospital Annual CABG Volume, No. of Procedures
0 50 100 150 200
Surgeon Annual CABG Volume, No. of Procedures
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council
Results of Simulated Policy of Referral to Mid-High Volume Surgeons
Modeled outcomes of 1,000 simulated choices in each of 8 regions, in which patients of low volume surgeons were reassigned to surgeons with mid-high volumes in the same region
Statewide Mortality Risk Ratio, Observed vs.
Simulation: 1.080 (95% CI: 0.927 to 1.260)
With selective referral, predicted lives saved =
23, but 15.9% probability of increased lives lost
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council
Surgeon Mortality:
Actual vs. Simulated
All Surgeons High Volume Surgeons
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council
Probability Distribution of Predicted
Lives Saved by Simulated Policy
-100 -50 0 50
Predicted Lives Saved
100 150
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council
Conclusions
For individual consumers, surgeon volume is a weak predictor of mortality and re-admission
Large scale implementation of a selective CABG referral policy has non-trivial probability of negative public health impact
Lack of correlation among four studied outcome measures highlights need for multi-dimensional performance measurement
Pennsylvania Health Care Cost Containment Council