Demand Driven Research: The HIV Research Network Kelly A. Gebo MD MPH

advertisement

Demand Driven Research:

The HIV Research Network

Kelly A. Gebo MD MPH for the HIV Research Network

June 8, 2004

Objectives

 Focus on health services delivery to persons with HIV infection

 Key issues concern:

 Frequency of use of inpatient and outpatient care, and the costs of providing these services

 Use of and adherence to antiretroviral medications

 Access to care and socioeconomic disparities in utilization

 Quality of care and patient safety

HCSUS

 HIV Costs and Services Utilization Study

 Preceded HIVRN

 Collected data in 1996-1998

 Obtained nationally representative sample of

2,864 HIV+ patients in care

 Probability sample permits strong inferences to national population

 Unique data on utilization, clinical symptoms, outcomes in HIV patients

HCSUS-- Limitations

 Recruiting a nationally representative sample is extremely expensive and time-consuming

 Over 1 year to accrue baseline sample

 Sample becomes unrepresentative of population over time, unless refreshed.

 Difficult to obtain medical records from providers not linked to study

HIV Research Network (HIVRN)

 Trade-off representativeness for efficiency and large sample size.

 From HCSUS: Most HIV+ seen by providers with relatively large HIV caseloads.

 Recruit providers of HIV care and extract information from medical records.

 Supplement records data with personal interviews.

HIV Research Network

 Network of HIV care providers who can collect and transmit clinical and health services utilization for aggregate analyses to a coordinating center

 Provide up-to-date data on:

 Resource use and costs of care

 Clinical outcomes of care

 Linked clinical/resource use outcomes

HIV Research Network

21 HIV primary and specialty care sites CY 2004

Site Population

 13 Adult, 2 Pediatric only, 3 Adult and Pediatric

<500 500-1000 >1000

Alameda, Oakland*

Alliance, Boston *

Nemecheck, Kansas

City*

CHOP-Peds

St. Judes-Peds

St. Lukes-Peds

UCSD-Peds

CORE-Peds

Phoenix, AZ *

Drexel

Henry Ford

Montefiore*

OHSU

Rochester *

CORE-Chicago

Johns Hopkins

Montefiore

Parkland

St. Lukes-

Roosevelt

UCSD

Wayne State

*Community-based

Sample Size

1999 2000 2001

10,852 19,410 17,582

7,887

12,345

4,342

Operations

Sites individually collect information electronically and by chart abstraction

De-identified information sent to Central Data

Coordinating Center (DCC)

Data cleaned, quality assured

Reports sent back to sites for confirmation of data

Compatible, multisite database created

Preliminary data analysis at DCC

Data Dissemination

Data disseminated to investigators after research question proposed, data analysis approved by data subcommittee

Interactive data querying system on the internet

Public use data available

Operations

 Feedback

 Project officers meeting monthly

 Data Subcommittee calls 6x per year

 Full Committee calls quarterly

 Intranet website

 Abstracts, posters, papers

 Submission of research ideas, ideas for new variables

 Interview questions

 All contact information

Resource Utilization Data

 Acute/chronic hospital care

 Admission/Discharge dates

 Diagnoses

 Outpatient Visits

 Dates of service

Diagnoses

CPT Coding

 Emergency Department

 Substance Abuse/Mental Health Visits

 Insurance

Demographic Characteristics of

CY 2001 Sample (N=10,556)

Median Age (Range) 40 (18 – 89)

Male

Race

African-American

Caucasian

Hispanic

Other/Unknown

HIV Risk Factor

MSM

Heterosexual

IDU

MSM IDU

Heterosexual IDU

Other/UK

7,571 (71.7%)

5,070 (48.0%)

3,282 (31.1%)

2,017 (19.1%)

187 (1.8%)

4,021 (38.1%)

3,432 (32.5%)

1,383 (13.1%)

344 (3.3%)

544 (5.2%)

832 (7.9%)

Clinical Characteristics

CD4 Median

<50 cells/mm 3

51-200

201-500

>500

327

1,076 (10.2%)

2,076 (19.7%)

4,370 (41.4%)

3,034 (28.8%)

Viral Load

Median

<10K

10-100,000K

>100K

1,311 copies/ml

6,774 (64.2%)

2,386 (22.6%)

1,396 (13.2%)

Insurance Coverage

Medicaid

Uninsured

Medicare

Private/HMO

Other

31.9%

31.4%

16.3%

11.4%

9.1%

Utilization in CY 2001

Overall

Blacks

Whites

Women

Men

Age>40

Age<40

OP Utilization

(Visits/year)

5.15

4.58

5.37

IP Utilization

(Admissions/100 PY)

35.8

40.5

28.8

4.80

5.28

5.57

4.64

42.5

33.1

38.4

32.6

Changes from HIVRN utilization data

“We are currently utilizing data from E.R. visits to ascertain various modes which patients use to access care:

(1) those who use E.R. and

(2) those who use the [urgent care] clinic for primary care.

With this data we will be able to identify clients who need help in obtaining primary care in our clinic”

Kathleen Clanon, M.D., Alameda County Medical Center

“ Our monthly collection of CD4 count, viral load values, and missing values has encouraged clinicians to more closely track both the patients in the clinic, and patients who have missed appointments and are late for quarterly clinical and lab monitoring. This has resulted in additional efforts to track patients who have missed visits.”

James Hellinger, M.D.

– Community Medical Alliance, Boston, MA

Pharmacy Utilization

HAART Usage (CD4<350)

PI Backbone

NNRTI Backbone

 PCP (2 or more CD4<200):

 MAC (2 or more CD4<50)

91%

68%

63%

88%

87%

Factors Associated with

PCP Prophylaxis

Male

Age ≥ 40

Blacks

Hispanics

IDU’s

> 4 OP visits

AOR (95% CI)*

(N=2,533)

1.35 (1.00, 1.83)

1.28 (0.89, 1.85)

0.99 (0.71, 1.39)

1.03 (0.70, 1.52)

1.28 (0.89, 1.85)

2.39 (1.76, 3.24)

*Adjusted for site of care, insurance

Factors Associated with

MAC Prophylaxis

Male

Age ≥ 40

Blacks

Hispanics

IDU’s

> 4 OP visits

AOR (95% CI)

(N=754)

1.10 (0.63, 1.92)

0.85 (0.54, 1.36)

0.90 (0.49, 1.63)

1.44 (0.69, 3.03)

0.68 (0.37, 1.23)

1.85 (1.02, 3.35)

*Adjusted for site of care, insurance

Clinical Changes from PCP/MAC Project

“ Projects in the works now include a red flag letter that notifies docs of particular deficiencies (such as lack of PCP or MAI prophylaxis, patients on triple nuke therapy and regimens that have incorrect dosing or contains meds that shouldn't be used together).”

Robert Beil, MD- Montefiore Medical Center

“ 'The data obtained.…has been helpful in identifying other opportunities to improve and comply with HIV/AIDS national guidelines. Tracking the

CD4 and meds listed on the same page is a reminder to start the patient on prophylaxis as needed.”

John Jovanovitch, MD - Henry Ford Hospital System, Detroit, MI

“ Participation in the HIV Research Network has been a major stimulus driving our data collection into the clinical realm. It is incredibly productive to reflect upon our own experience, as measured against our peers and national guidelines, as we strive to improve the care we deliver both at systemic and individual levels”

Peter Sklar, MD - Drexel University, Philadelphia, PA

Interview

 950 adult and 300 pediatric

 Topics assessed include

 HIV related symptoms and quality of life

 Adherence to ART

 Mental Health and Substance Abuse treatment

 Adverse Drug Events

 More detailed utilization data:

Case management, home care, pharmacy

 Insurance Coverage

Safety

 Drug Interactions

 Variations in care across sites

 Intranet error reporting system

Manuscripts

2002 JAIDS Manuscript on Utilization

2004 JAIDS Disparities in Access to HAART

(in press)

Under Review

2000/2001 IP/OP Utilization

2001 IP Diagnoses

High rates of OI prophylaxis

Variations in Quality of Care

Pediatric IP/OP Utilization

Pediatric VL suppression

Conclusions

 Near real time data collection with quick feedback to sites

 Addresses disparities in care and safety issues

 Data from the HIVRN may be useful for:

 Allocation of healthcare resources

 Improvement of HIV prevention and treatment strategies

Future Directions

Longitudinal Data Analysis

 Link treatment to clinical outcomes

Evaluate complications of HAART

Impact of hepatitis co-infection

Impact of SA/MH diagnoses

Pediatric Issues

 Growth and development

Reproduction

Disclosure

Interview Data

 Evaluate QOL, HIV symptoms

 Assess adherence

HIVRN Collaborators

Adult Sites

 Victoria Sharp-

St. Luke’s Roosevelt, NY

W. Christopher Mathews- UCSD, San Diego

Philip Keiser- Parkland Hospital, Dallas

James Hellinger- Community Medical Alliance, Boston

Patrick Nemecheck- Nemecheck Health Renewal,

Kansas City

P. Todd Korthuis- OHSU, Portland

Jeff Nadler- Tampa General Health Care, Tampa

Robert Beil- Montefiore Medical Center, NY

Lawrence Hanau- Montefiore Medical Center, NY

John Post- McDowell Health Care Center, Phoenix

Lawrence Crane- Wayne State University, Detroit

John Jovanovitch- Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit

Kathlen Clanon- Alameda County Consortium, Oakland

Kathye Gorosh- CORE Foundation Chicago

Steven Fine- Community Health Network, Rochester

Peter Sklar- Drexel University, Philadelphia

Pediatric Sites

Stephen Spector-UCSD,

San Diego

Patricia Flynn-

St. Jude’s,

Memphis

Richard Rutstein- CHOP,

Philadelphia

Data Coordinating Center

 Richard Moore

Jeanne Keruly

Haya Rubin

Kelly Gebo

Erin Reilly

Liming Zhou

George Siberry

Funding Sources

 AHRQ

SAMHSA

HRSA

OAR

Hospitalization Rates

6

5

8

7

4

3

2

1

0

A

ID

S-R e la te d

AIDS-Related: Pneumonia, PCP

GI: Pancreatic diseases, liver diseases

Mental Health: Substance-related, affective disorders

Circulatory: Carditis, hypertension

GI

M e n ta l

C irc u la to ry

In fe c ti o u s to ry

R e s p ira

N e rv o u s

Sy s t.

In ju ry

G e n it o u ri n a ry

Bl o o d

Sk in

O th e

H

IV

d r ia g n o s is

N e o p la s m in g

M is s

M u s c u lo s ke l.

Pre g n a n c y

Hospitalization Rates

6

5

8

7

4

3

2

1

0

A

ID

S-R e la te d

GI

M e n ta l

C irc u la to ry

In fe c ti o u s to ry

R e s p ira

N e rv o u s

Sy s t.

In ju ry

G e n it o u ri n a ry

Bl o o d

Sk in

O th e

H

IV

d r ia g n o s is

N e o p la s m in g

M is s

M u s c u lo s ke l.

Pre g n a n c y

Related documents
Download