Chabot College
Academic Program Review Report
Year Two of
Program Review Cycle
[Discipline or Cluster or Program Name]
Submitted on [Date]
[Name of Contact Person/Preparer]
Draft #2, 11/28/12
1
Table of Contents
Section A: What Progress Have We Made? .............................. X
Section B: What Changes Do We Suggest? ................................ X
Required Appendices:
A: Budget History ........................................................................................ X
B1: Course Learning Outcomes Assessment Schedule ................................ X
B2: “Closing the Loop” Assessment Reflections ......................................... X
C: Program Learning Outcomes................................................................... X
D: A Few Questions .................................................................................... X
E: New Initiatives ....................................................................................... X
F1: New Faculty Requests ........................................................................... X
F2: Classified Staffing Requests ................................................................... X
F3: FTEF Requests ....................................................................................... X
F4: Academic Learning Support Requests .................................................. X
F5: Supplies and Services Requests ............................................................. X
F6: Conference/Travel Requests ................................................................. X
F7: Technology and Other Equipment Requests ......................................... X
2
A. What Progress Have We Made?
Complete Appendices A (Budget History), B1 and B2 (CLO's), C (PLO's), and D (A few questions) prior to
writing your narrative. You should also review your most recent success, equity, course sequence,
and enrollment data at http://www.chabotcollege.edu/ProgramReview/Data2012.cfm.
In year one, you established goals and action plans for program improvement. This section asks
you to reflect on the progress you have made toward those goals. This analysis will be used by
the PRBC and Budget Committee to assess progress toward achievement of our Strategic Plan
and to inform future budget decisions. It will also be used by the SLOAC and Basic Skills
committees as input to their priority-setting process. In your narrative of two or less pages,
address the following questions:





What were your year one Program Review goals?
Did you achieve those goals? Specifically describe your progress on the goals you set for
student learning, program learning, and Strategic Plan achievement.
What are you most proud of?
What challenges did you face that may have prevented achieving your goals?
Cite relevant data in your narrative (e.g., efficiency, persistence, success, FT/PT faculty
ratios, CLO/PLO assessment results, external accreditation demands, etc.).
B. What Changes Do We Suggest?
Review the Strategic Plan goal and key strategies at XX prior to completing your narrative.
Please complete Appendices E (New Initiatives) and F1-7 (Resources Requested) to further detail
your narrative. Limit your narrative to two pages, and be very specific about what you hope to
achieve, why, and how.
Given your experiences and student achievement results over the past year, what changes do
you suggest to your course/program improvement plan? What new initiatives might you begin to
support the achievement of our Strategic Plan goal? Do you have new ideas to improve student
learning? What are your specific, measurable goals? How will you achieve them? Would any of these
require collaboration with other disciplines or areas of the college? How will make that collaboration
occur?