Numbers we have to report
AND Goals we have to set
•
14a. Successful student course completion rate for the fall 2012 semester
•
14b. Institution-set standard for student course completion rate
•
15a. Percent of students retained from fall 2011 to fall 2012 semesters
•
15b. Institution-set standard for student retention percentage
•
16a. Number of students who received a degree in the 2011-12 academic year
•
16b. Institution-set standard for student degree completion number
•
18a. Number of students who completed certificate requirements and received a
certificate in the 2011-12 academic year
•
18b. Institution-set standard for student certificate completion number
Proposed PRBC Agenda for the Spring
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
March 6th: Program Review Process, Accreditation goal setting, Title V presentation
March 13th: Initiative workgroups, Program review reading groups
March 20th: Strategic Plan Initiative Reports, feedback on program review
process/insights to date; shared governance effectiveness process proposal
March 27th: Initiative workgroups, program review reading groups
April 10th: Shared governance structure, document, Initiative workgroup reports
April 17th: Initiative workgroups, Program review reading groups
April 24th: Program review conclusions session, preparation for 4/30 Flex Day
May 1st: Flex feedback, connecting program review to resource allocation
May 8th: Environmental scan, Classified prioritization
May 15th: Assessing our effectiveness, planning for the future, summer retreat
•
Dates in bold are PRBC Meeting dates.
Good of the Order
• Jennifer: anything to say about April Flex Day
• Opportunity for BSILI, conference opportunity
and time to plan and develop projects with
support. We have been asked to “opt-in” early,
and we’d like to send teams—initiative groups
(e.g., pathways, college up, diversity, etc) are
possibles. This is a really great opportunity:
interest?
• SLOAC: noticed on the Flex day planning, a note
about impact of “outside changes.” Something
we need to know?
PRBC Process for Program Review
•
•
•
•
•
•
Deans review program reviews and summarize them. AND shared governance committees
review pertinent sections and dean's summary. Deans and committees generate
response. GOAL: INTEGRATION AND FEEDBACK
Deans' summary and committee responses will use templates (accreditation style, noting
excellence, good work, weaknesses, recommendations, and required action) AS WELL AS
prioritize:1) short term and doable, 2) possible action but with challenges, 3) documented
need, but no resources. GOAL: CONSISTENCY and PRIORITIZATION.
Aggregate deans' summaries and committee responses. PRBC reviews draft, available to
whole campus. DATE NEEDED: GOAL: TRANSPARENCY
In progress: online library of submissions, templates, and cues. Paper copy provided to each
shared governance committee. Deans and committees will work through April 24, with
Dean's summaries due to committees as soon as possible. Final responses from committees
will be due XXXXX. GOAL: PAPER TRAIL, INTEGRATION, FEEDBACK, TRANSPARENCY
Discussion of draft at April XXXX meetings includes prioritization and recommendations,
finalized on April 24 and made available. GOAL: COMPLETE IN TIMELY WAY, TRANSPARENCY
Background: a READING GROUP will commit to dividing up and reading ALL program review
documents. GOAL: ENSURE INTEGRATED PERSPECTIVE (Accreditation requirement)