Chabot College
Program Review Report
2014 -2015
Year ?of
Program Review CycleYear 1
“You are in the same cycle as last year!”
Academic Program: Disabled Students
Program & ServicesAdaptive Physical Education
Computer Application Systems
Learning Skills
Psychology Counseling
Submitted on 11/01/13
Contact: Kathleen R. Allen
Final Forms, 1/18/13
1
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” Discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
CAS 100
Spring 2012
1
1
100%
Fall 2012
Allison Golde
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: The student shall demonstrate keyboarding
technique by touch.
75%
75%
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL perform basic computer operations
75%
75%
(CLO) 3: Perform basic computer operations.
75%
75%
(CLO) 4: Students will demonstrate correct posture
and finger placement based on each students’
disability.
75%
75%
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
2
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
A. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
75% of the class scored a 3 or 4.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are making progress and meeting the goals of the course.
B. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
The majority of students were able to type up to 20 wpm by touch with less than 3
errors.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are making progress and meeting the course goal.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
75% of the class met or exceeded the abovegoal.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Most of the students had prior computer knowledge, however there were some
students who had no knowledge of the computer. These students needed instruction
on an individual basis.
3
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
They exceeded the above definition of success.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are making progress and meeting this outcome.
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
1. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
2. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
3. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
4
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
CAS 101
Spring 2012
1
1
100%
Spring 2012
Allison Golde
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: Student will be able to create and print a
word document.
75%
75%
(CLO) 2: Students will perform a spell and grammar check in Word.
(CLO) 3: Students will save, delete, and rename document files in
75%
75%
75%
75%
Word.
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
5
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
The current scores exceed the above definition, which lead me to believe the
majority of students were able to understand the subject matter. They were able to
effectively produce the material through adaptive learning examples.
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The scores that indicate success for me is a 3 or a 4, meaning more than 75% of
the class scored 3 or 4.
The data clearly shows many students are able to produce basic word
documents, when prompted. I feel that many of the students could benefit from
a year long course in Microsoft office. I also believe technology that is taught,
such as Kurzweil and Dragon, while effective, would benefit my students if they
were added to the computers my students use in my class.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
75% of the students met this goal.
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are meeting this CLO despite the fact that many students enter
the course with little or no computer knowledge.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
75% of the students scored a 3 or 4 which meets my target score.
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
6
Students are becoming more confident using word.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
4. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
5. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
6. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
7
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
CAS 102
Spring 2012
3
3
100%
Spring 2012
Kathleen R. Allen
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: Upon completion of the course the
student will be able to use screen reading, speech
recognition and screen enlargement software.
50%
18%
(CLO) 2: Use scan/read software.
60%
82%
(CLO) 3: Use assistive technology to access the
internet.
60%
82%
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
8
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Assessment revealed lower scores than expected at 18%.
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Assessment revealed lower scores than expected at 18%. The course learning
outcome needs to be changed. The student that scored 3 or 4, the form of
instruction and materials work for them. Change CLO to better reflect their
use of assistive technology.
F. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
82% of the students scored a 3or 4 which exceeded my expectations of 60%.
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
This CLO works for the majority of students since they are learning scan/read
programs.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
At 82% the students scored higher than expected.
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Even though the students scored higher the CLO needs to be reviewed.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
9
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
7. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
8. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
The course is unique in that the curriculum is structured on the assistive technology
required by the students disability. As a Result the curriculum includes; screen reader
(JAWS), scan/read (Kurzweil 3000/1000), screen enlargement )Magic) and speech
recognition (Dragon) programs. The student will utilize the assistive technology as they
continue their education, in employment and in their personal lives.
9. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other: CLO 1 and 2 must be changed to assess how the student will use the assistive
technology not which technology they will use.
10
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
CAS 103
Spring 2012
1
1
100%
Spring 2012
Kathleen R. Allen
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
(CLO) 1: Demonstrate proficiency with the basic
functions of his/her appropriate assistive technology,
keyboarding, word processing and internet access.
75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
76%
(CLO) 2:
(CLO) 3:
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
G. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
11
7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Assessment reveals higher scores than expected at 76%.
8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are making progress but they must be taught on an individual
basis according to their disability.
H. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
12
8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
10. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
11. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
12. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
13
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
English 116
Spring 2012
5
5
100%
Spring 2012
Jerry Egusa, Monica Munger,
Shirley Pejman
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: Students will demonstrate newly acquired
study skills.
100%/59 act
96%%/54 act
(CLO) 2: Students will increase their
understanding of applying compensatory learning
strategies based on their individualized learning
styles.
100%/59act.
96%/49act
(CLO) 3: Students will increase their understanding
of their learning strengths and weaknesses.
100%/59 act
96%/54 act
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
14
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
I. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
The scores indicate that over 90% of the students are achieving the outcome.
10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress and achieving the outcome.
J. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Over 85% of the students assessed understands their learning style.
10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress and achieving the outcome.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Over 90% of the students are understanding their learning strengths and
weaknesses.
10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress and achieving the outcome.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
15
9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
13. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
14. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
15. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
16
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
English 117
Fall 2011
1
1
100%
Fall 2011
Monica Munger
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: An ability to articulate and demonstrate which reading
and compensatory strategies work for them.
23 act
22 act
(CLO) 2: An ability to visually recognize and
pronounce new and familiar words using a
multisensory approach.
9 act
8 act
(CLO) 3: An ability to write a simple summary.
23 act
19 act
(CLO) 4: Increase reading comprehension
23 act
22 act
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
17
K. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
11. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Well over 89% of students achieved this outcome.
12. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress and meeting this goal of the course.
L. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
11. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
The majority of students were able to complete this outcome.
12. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress and achieving the outcome.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
11. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Since the students are achieving this goal; no changes to the course are indicated.
12. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No changes are indicated, since students are making progress.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
18
11. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students are exceeding our expectations and achieving this outcome.
12. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress and meeting this outcome.
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
16. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
17. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
18. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
19
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
English 118A
Spring 2012
2
2
100%
Spring 2012
Jerry Egusa, Monica Munger
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: Students will identify support details and transition words
while distinguishing the differences between major and minor details.
100%/48 act
na/33 act
(CLO) 2: Students will increase their ability to identify the main
idea of presented passages.
100%/49 act
Na/34 act
(CLO) 3: Students will increase their receptive and expressive
vocabulary skills.
100%/49 act
Na/34 act
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
M. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
20
13. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
About 69% of the students met this goal.
14. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The majority of students are making progress and meeting this outcome.
N. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
13. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Over 69% of the students assessed, achieved this outcome.
14. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress and achieving this outcome.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
13. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students are making progress and meeting this outcome.
14. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are successfully meeting this outcome.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
13. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
21
14. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
19. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
20. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
21. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
22
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
English 118B
Fall 2011
1
1
100%
Fall 2011
Monica Munger
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: An ability to write a 500 word essay.
15 act
13 act
(CLO) 2: Improved ability to identify and apply grammar rules in
their own writing.
15 act
13 act
(CLO) 3: Increased confidence as a writer.
15 act
13 act
(CLO) 4: Increased reading comprehension.
15 act
13 act
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
O. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
23
15. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Over 87% of the students met this outcome.
16. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
It is great that 87% of the students showed ability to write a 500 word essay. It is
great that 87% of the students showed ability to write a 500 word essay.
P. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
15. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Over 87% of the students achieved this outcome.
16. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The data reveals that the students are making progress with their writing.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
15. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
87% of the students are becoming more confident as writers.
16. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress and meeting this outcome.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
15. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students are making progress with their reading comprehension.
24
16. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Student are making progress at 87% of the class.
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
22. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
23. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
24. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
25
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
English 119
Spring 2012
3
3
100%
Spring 2012
Jerry Egusa
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: Students will increase their ability to perform (addition,
subtraction, multiplication, division, fractions, decimals, percents,
algebra and linear equations.
100%
NA
(CLO) 2: Students will increase their ability to problem solve basic
arithmetic word problems.
100%
NA
(CLO) 3: Students will increase their ability to utilize assistive
technology while performing mathematical problems.
100%
NA
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
26
Q. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
17. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Since this course is taught on an extremely individualized basis, it is difficult to
assess the class as a whole; but students are making progress with their mathematic
skills.
18. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Since this course is difficult to accurately assess but students are going on to be
successful in Math 103 and 104.
R. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
17. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
As shown by the students making progress in Math 103 and 104; it is clear that
students are meeting this outcome.
18. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are meeting this goal; since they are successful in Math 103 and 104.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
17. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Since the curriculum is extremely individualized; this CLO is very difficult to
assess.
18. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress as shown through their success in higher level math
courses.
27
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
17. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
18. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
25. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
26. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
27. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
28
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
English 120
Fall 2011
1
1
100%
Fall 2011
Monica Munger
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: ABILITY TO APPLY SELF -ADVOCACY
TECHNIQUES WITH INSTRUCTORS.
17 act
15 act
(CLO) 2:FAMILIARITY WITH SERVICES AVAILABLE TO
HIM/HER
18 act
17 act
(CLO) 3: THE ABILITY TO USE COMPENSATORY
STRATEGIES TO THEIR SPECIFIC LEARNING DISABILITY
AND LEARNING STYLE.
18 act
17 act
(CLO) 4: THE ABILITY TO USE STUDY SKILLS
APPROPRIATE TO THE MATERIALS BEING USED.
18 act
16 act
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
29
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
S. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
19. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
88% of the students are making progress by meeting this outcome.
20. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
For many persons this is very difficult to achieve; but the students are making
great progress.
T. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
19. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students are meeting this outcome at 94%.
20. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are becoming more familiar with the services needed for their
disability.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
19. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students are making significant progress by meeting this outcome at 94%.
20. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress by meeting this outcome.
30
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
19. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students are meeting this outcome by 89%
20. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress and meeting this goal.
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
28. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
29. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
30. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
31
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
English 121
Spring 2012
1
1
100%
Spring 2012
Jerry Egusa
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: STUDENTS WILL INCREASE THEIR ABILITY
TO APPLY SELF-ADVOCACY TECHNIQUES WITH
INSTRUCTORS AND STAFF.
100%
NA
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL INCREASE THEIR ABILITY
TO USE COMPENSATORY ARITHMATIC STRATEGIES.
100%
NA
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL INCREASE THEIR ABILITY
TO USE QUANTATATIVE BASED STUDY SKILLS
APPROPRIATE TO THE ARITHMATIC MATERIALS
BEING USED.
100%
NA
(CLO) 4: STUDENTS WILL INCREASE THEIR
AWARENESS OF ON AND OFF CAMPUS AND ONLINE
SERVICES AVAILABLE.
100%
NA
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
32
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
U. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
21. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
This outcome is very difficult to assess but students are becoming better self
advocates as they communicate their needs to Math 103, 104, 65, 55, 43 instructors.
22. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress by passing their higher level math courses.
V. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
21. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students are making progress by improving their compensatory strategies in
mathematics.
22. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are performing better in their higher level math courses.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
21. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students are meeting this outcome, since they show improved quantitative based
study skills.
33
22. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are making progress, since they are understanding quantitative study skills
in their higher level math courses.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
21. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
With the increasing number of students utilizing PATH, Math Lab and online math
tutorials; it is apparent they are meeting this outcome.
22. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
It is clear that students are making progress in their math courses by meeting this
outcome.
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
31. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
32. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
33. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
34
35
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
Felicia Tripp
PSCN 20
Fall 2011
2
2
100%
Spring 2012
Kathleen R. Allen,
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: Students will be able to identify what level of GPA would
place a student on Academic Probation
75%
78.4%
(CLO) 2: Students will be able to identify four resources on campus
that will assist them in becoming successful students.
70%
73.9%
(CLO) 3:
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
W. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
36
23. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Assessment reflected higher scores than expected.
24. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have successfully met this outcome.
X. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
23. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students met this outcome at a higher level than expected.
24. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have met this outcome at a higher level than expected.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
23. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
24. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
23. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
37
24. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
34. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
35. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
36. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
38
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
PSCN 901
Fall 2011
1
1
100%
Spring 2012
Kathleen R. Allen, Felicia Tripp
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: A student will become comfortable
advocating for the academic accommodations they are
eligible to utilize based on their disabilities with their
instructors.
75%
92.3%
(CLO) 2: A student will become comfortable
communicating their needs to persons employed at
state and community agencies.
75%
92.3%
(CLO) 3: A student will obtain the skills to
effectively communicate with their family and
friends in an assertive manner.
75%
92.3%
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
39
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
Y. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
25. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students scored higher than expected at 92%.
26. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have successfully met this outcome.
Z. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
25. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students have successfully met this outcome at a level higher than expected.
26. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are successfully communicating their needs to State and community
agencies.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
25. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students made progress by meeting this outcome as reflected in their scores.
26. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have made progress by becoming more assertive with their family and
friends.
40
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
25. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
26. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
37. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
38. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
39. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
41
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
PSCN 902
Fall 2011
1
1
100%
Spring 2012
Kathleen R. Allen, Felicia Tripp
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: A student will become comfortable
advocating for the academic accommodations they are
eligible to utilize based on their disabilities with their
instructors.
75%
76.9%
(CLO) 2: A student will become comfortable
communicating their needs to persons employed at
state and community agencies.
75%
84.6%
(CLO) 3: A student will obtain the skills to
effectively communicate with their family and
friends in an assertive manner.
75%
83.3%
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
42
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
AA.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
27. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students scored higher than expected at 76.9%.
28. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have successfully met this outcome.
BB.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
27. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students have successfully met this outcome at a level higher than expected.
28. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are successfully communicating their needs to State and community
agencies.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
27. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students made progress by meeting this outcome as reflected in their scores.
28. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have made progress by becoming more assertive with their family and
friends.
43
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
27. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
28. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
40. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
41. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
42. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
44
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
PSCN 903
Fall 2011
1
1
100%
Spring 2012
Kathleen R. Allen, Felicia Tripp
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: A student will become comfortable
advocating for the academic accommodations they are
eligible to utilize based on their disabilities with their
instructors.
75%
83.4%
(CLO) 2: A student will become comfortable
communicating their needs to persons employed at
state and community agencies.
75%
88.9%
(CLO) 3: A student will obtain the skills to
effectively communicate with their family and
friends in an assertive manner.
75%
88.9%
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
45
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
CC.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
29. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students scored higher than expected at 83.4%
30. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have successfully met this outcome.
DD.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
29. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students have successfully met this outcome at a level higher than expected.
30. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are successfully communicating their needs to State and community
agencies.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
29. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students made progress by meeting this outcome as reflected in their scores.
30. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have made progress by becoming more assertive with their family and
friends.
46
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
29. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
30. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
43. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
44. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
45. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
47
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
PSCN 904
Fall 2011
1
1
100%
Spring 2012
Kathleen R. Allen, Felicia Tripp
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1: A student will become comfortable
advocating for the academic accommodations they are
eligible to utilize based on their disabilities with their
instructors.
75%
80%
(CLO) 2: A student will become comfortable
communicating their needs to persons employed at
state and community agencies.
75%
80%
(CLO) 3: A student will obtain the skills to
effectively communicate with their family and
friends in an assertive manner.
75%
80%
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
48
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
EE. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
31. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students scored higher than expected at 80%
32. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have successfully met this outcome.
FF. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
31. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students have successfully met this outcome at a level higher than expected.
32. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are successfully communicating their needs to State and community
agencies.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
31. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Students made progress by meeting this outcome as reflected in their scores.
32. : Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your
discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have made progress by becoming more assertive with their family and
49
friends.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
31. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
32. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
46. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
47. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
48. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
X Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
X Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
50
Appendix C: Program Learning Outcomes
Considering your feedback, findings, and/or information that has arisen from the course level
discussions, please reflect on each of your Program Level Outcomes.
Program: Disabled Students Programs & Services

PLO #1:
Interpret and apply compensatory learning strategies based on their individual learning style.
Engl. 116, 117, 120, 121
CAS 102
PLO #2:
 Demonstrate a Competency with increasing vocabulary skills, ability to identify main
idea and supported ideas in passages, computation of math problems and in computer
keyboarding.
CAS 100 and 103, English 118A and 119

PLO #3:
The ability to write a 500 word essay, create and edit Microsoft word documents, use assistive
technology to complete their research and course assignments, request and utilize academic
accommodations according to their individual needs to enhance their college success
CAS 101, English 118A, 118B and 119, PSCN 20 and DSRC

PLO #4:
Demonstrate an ability to communicate effectively for student success based on their individual
needs.
PSCN 20, 901-4, English 120, 121 and DSRC
What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions?
Explain:
How can we better serve evening students? Offer Learning Skills, CAS and PSCN courses in the
evening.
What program-level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed?
Strengths revealed:
Since DSPS Program courses are consistently filled over 100%, students are successfully
meeting these outcomes. We have an increasing number of students who are becoming more
aware of their individual needs and requesting accommodations through the DSRC. Therefore
DSPS students are passing higher level English and Math courses and completing their
educational goals of earning Certificates, AA/AS degrees and transferring to 4 year colleges.
What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of
students completing your program?
Actions planned:
51
Reinstate English 116 E72 in the Spring semester.
Program: _____
 PLO #1:

PLO #2:

PLO #3:

PLO #4:
What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions?
What program-level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed?
What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of
students completing your program?
52