Chabot College
Program Review Report
Check one:
__X_ SLO Portion of Upcoming ’16-’17
Program Review
(Submitted May 2015 in Preparation for Oct 2015)
___ Revision to ’15-’16 Program Review
(Originally Submitted Oct 2014)
___ Revision to ’14-’15 Program Review
(Originally Submitted Oct 2013)
Submitted on
Contact:
1
Appendix B: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
Art 3 B,C,D
SPR 2015
1
1
100%
fall 2014
Thiel, Mendenhall
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
75%
100%
(CLO) 2: DRAW THE HUMAN FORM ACCURATELY AND IN AN
ANATOMICALLY CORRECT WAY.
75%
100%
(CLO) 3: DRAW A FIGURE COMPOSITION BASED ON A CLEAR
AND PRECISE DESIGN.
75%
100%
(CLO) 4: COORDINATE EYE AND HAND SKILLS.
75%
100%
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: DRAW THE HUMAN FORM ACCURATELY AND IN AN
ANATOMICALLY CORRECT WAY.
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
2
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
A. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Target exceeded
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed
B. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Target exceeded
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed
3
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Target exceeded
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Target exceeded
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
4
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
1. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
The success rate percentages for the advanced levels of art 3 B, C, D were well above
campus averages , often 100%. In discussions with other faculty, everyone agreed that this
is more due to the nature of all the advanced courses in the studio art discipline than the
individual courses. When asked what actions the art discipline might take, it was decided
that the target percentage 75% might be raised to 100%.
2. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
Full-time and part-time art instructors met and discussed what course level and
programmatic strengths were revealed by the assessment totals. The success rate
percentages were well above campus averages , often 100%. Everyone agreed that this is
more due to the nature of the discipline than the individual courses. When asked what
actions the art discipline might take, it was decided that the target percentage 75% might be
raised to 100%.
3. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:_change to the objective of the
rubric________________________________________________________________
5
Appendix B: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
art 16 B, C, D
spring 2015
2
1
50%
fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar, Esquierido
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3-4 75%
100%
(CLO) 2: ACHIEVE TRIMMING SKILLS WHICH EXHIBIT
CRAFTMENTSHIP.
3-4 75%
100%
(CLO) 3: ACHIEVE GLAZING SKILLS, WHICH EXHIBIT A
KNOWLEDGE OF GLAZE AND ITS REACTION TO FIRE.
3-4 75%
100%
(CLO) 4: ACHIEVE BASIC TECHNICAL SKILLS IN HAND BUILDING
FORMS.
3-4 75%
100%
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1:
ACHIEVE BASIC SKILLS OF WHEEL-THROWN FORMS.
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
6
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
7
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
A. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Exceeded target.
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The success rate percentages for the advanced levels of art 16 B, C, D were well above
campus averages , often 100%. In discussions with other faculty, everyone agreed that this
is more due to the nature of all the advanced courses in the studio art discipline than the
individual courses. When asked what actions the art discipline might take, it was decided
that the target percentage 75% might be raised to 100%.
B. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Exceeded target scores
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
There are any number of glaze combinations that require repeated experimentation to
master glazing pottery. The more sections of ART16 offered, the more frequently the
kiln gets fired, the more changes to experiment. One section per semester is not
enough.
8
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Exceeded target scores
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Advanced students score consistently by because by this time they have mastered the
basics and are dedicated to improving with practice.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Exceeded target stores
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Advanced students score consistently by because by this time they have mastered the
basics and are dedicated to improving with practice.
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
9
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
4. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
None.
5. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
See response to question A2 above
6. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other: Change to the objective of the
rubric______________________________________________________________
10
Appendix B: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
ART24
SPR 2015
1
1
100%
FALL 2014
THIEL, , Golojich,
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
 Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 1:THREE-DIMENSIONAL AWARENESS AND REQUIRE
EXPLORATION AND MANIPULATION OF THE BASIC THREE-
3-4 75%
90.66%
(CLO) 2: STUDIO PROJECTS THAT EXPLORE THE ELEMENTS AND
ORGANIZING PRINCIPLES OF THREE-DIMENSIONAL DESIGNS
3-4 75%
90.66%
(CLO) 3: DEVELOPMENT OF SKILLS AND PROCESSES USING A
VARIETY OF ARTISTIC MATERIALS, TECHNIQUES, AND TOOLS,
APPROPRIATE TO AN INTRODUCTORY STUDY IN DESIGN, WHICH
MAY INCLUDE PAPER, WOOD PLASTER, WIRE, METAL, CLAY,
FIBER, MIXED MEDIA ETC.
3-4 75%
90.66%
DIMENSIONAL MATERIALS
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
11
* Defined Target Scores: What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this
CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
12
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
A. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Exceeds target scores
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The success rate percentages for the advanced levels of Art 24 were well above campus
averages , often 100%. In discussions with other faculty, everyone agreed that this is more
due to the nature of all the advanced courses in the studio art discipline than the individual
courses. When asked what actions the art discipline might take, it was decided that the
target percentage 75% might be raised to 100%
B. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Exceeds target towards
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
See response to question A2 appendix B
13
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Exceeds target scores
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
See response to question A2 appendix B
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED.
14
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
7. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
There were no changes needed in the last cycle.
8. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
None
9. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 Other:_________________________________________________________________
15