Chabot College
Program Review Report
2015 -2016
Year three of
Program Review Cycle
ART
Submitted on Oct.2014
Contact: Clayton Thiel
REVISED 5/1/15
Final Forms, 1/18/13
1
UPDATE 5/1/15
Full-time and part-time art instructors met and discussed what course
level and programmatic strengths were revealed by the assessment
totals. The success rate percentages were well above campus averages —
often 100%. Everyone agreed that this is more due to the nature of the
discipline than the individual courses. When asked what actions the art
discipline might take, it was decided that the target percentage 75%
might be raised to 100%.
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 7A
Fall 2013
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
Form Instructions:
 Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning
Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule.
 Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
 Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the
individual CLO.

Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course
as a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: STUDENT WILL POINT AND MANIPULATE
MATERIALS, BASIC METHODS, AND BEGINNING
TECHNIQUES UNIQUE TO TRANSPARENT WATERCOLOR
2
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3 & 4 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
60.7 3
39.3 4
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL UNDERSTAND COLOR AND
COMPOSITION THROUGH THE USE OF WATERCOLOR
3 & 4 75%
3.6 2
53.6 3
42.9 4
(CLO) 3:STUDENTS WILL DEMONSTRATE THE BASIC
3 & 4 75%
53.6 3
42.9 4
WATERCOLOR VALUE CONTRASTS NECESSARY FOR A
SUCCESSFUL PAINTING
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
3
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
A. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Art 7A scores reach and exceed target score.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
ART 7A is very successful assisting the beginning students reach their artistic
goals.
B. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Scores reach and exceed target score.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Composition skills set for the student successfully assisted the students to reach
their goals.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Scores reflect successful achievement by the students for CLO3
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
A high number of students achieve the target for the CLO.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
1. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
4
No changes were necessary, because the students’ high scores reflect success in their
achievements.
2. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
The assessment revealed success in all CLOs and no actions are necessary.
3. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:_Continue with successful course and program strengths.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 7B
Fall 2013
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1:STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO PAINT DIFFERENT
PICTURES USING DIFFERENT WATERCOLOR TECHNIQUE
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL COMPOSE COMPLEX
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3&4 75%
COLOR THAT EMPHASIZES VALUE AS A BASIS FOR COLOR
CONTRAST
36.4 3
64.6 4
3&4 75%
45.4 3
56.6 4
3&4 75%
27.3 3
72.7 4
WATERCOLOR PAINTING COMPOSITIONS
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL DEMONSTRATE THE USE OF
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
(CLO) 4
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
5
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The scores reflect success in students’ level in watercolor techniques.
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students should continue with successful CLO.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The scores reflect success by the student in understanding and creating compositions.
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students are successful in composing designs in their work, which reflect
success in this CLO.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
The students have achieved high scores in this CLO; therefore, the students are
successful.
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students have grasped the idea of value and color in their work; therefore,
they have achieved this CLO.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
4. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
No changes were made.
5. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
The assessments revealed success in all CLOs and no actions are necessary.
6
6. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:__Continue with successful course and program strengths.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 7C
Fall 2013
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
WHILE THERE WERE NO STUDENTS, THIS COURSE IS A PART OF A FOUR-LEVEL
SEQUENCE, IN THIS CASE, THREE OF THE FOUR LEVELS WERE OFFERED AND
ASSESSED.
NORMALLY, THESE ARE ALL FOUR TAUGHT AT THE SAME TIME.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3&4 75%
N/A
(CLO) 2: STUDENT WILL BE CONTINUE TO IMPROVE
3&4 75%
N/A
& 7B
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL REINTERPRET HISTORICAL
3&4
N/A
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO SOLVE ADVANCED
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
COMPOSITIONAL PROBLEMS USING WATERCOLOR
WATERCOLOR SKILLS AND TECHNIQUES DEVELOPED IN 7A
INFLUENCES AS A BASIS FOR THEIR WORKS
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
7
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
N/A There are no students in 7C
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
N/A No students in 7C
F. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
N/A There are no students in 7C
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
N/A There are no students in 7C.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
N/A There are no students in 7C
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
N/A There are no students in 7C.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
7. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
There are no students in 7C.
8. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
N/A
9. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
8
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:___ No students enrolled in this semester._____
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 7D
Fall 2013
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: THE STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO PAINT
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3 & 4 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
100% 4
ADVANCED WATERCOLOR PAINTINGS BASED ON SKILLS
DEVELOPED IN 7A, 7B, AND 7C.
(CLO) 2: THE STUDENT WILL PRESENT THEIR WORKS IN
A PROFESSIONAL MANNER.
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL DEVELOP PERSONAL
VIEWPOINTS SO THEIR WORKS REFLECT THEIR OWN
EMOTIONAL PHILOSOPHIES.
3 & 4 75%
3 & 4 75%
75%
25%
25%
75%
3
4
3
4
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
9
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
G. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Students have achieved high scores in the CLO; therefore, students are successful.
8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students are successful in creating skilled paintings based on this CLO.
H. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Students success in this CLO is based on work exhibited professionally.
8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
This CLO was successfully achieved by the students.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Students have achieved high scores in this CLO; therefore the students are successful.
8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students have achieved and painted this idea of individual philosophy
extremely well.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
10. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
No changes were made.
11. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
The assessments revealed success in all CLOs and no actions are necessary.
12. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
10
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:__ Continue with successful course and program strengths.________
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 12A
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: THE STUDENT WILL BE ABLE TO CONTROL THE
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3 & 4 75%
FUNDAMENTALS OF BOTH DIRECT AND INDIRECT PAINTING
TECHNIQUES, INCLUDING GLAZING.
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL SHOW UNDERSTANDING BOTH
3 & 4 75%
IN ASSIGNMENTS AND THEIR PAINTINGS THE PRINCIPLES
OF COLOR THEORY AND PRACTICAL COLOR MIXING.
(CLO) 3: THE STUDENT WILL EXPERIENCE AND LEARN
HISTORICAL MASTER PAINTERS AND HOW THEY RELATE TO
THEIR WORK.
3 & 4 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
NS 8.3%
1
2
3 33.6%
4 54.6%
NS 8.3%
1
2 9.1%
3 45.4%
4 45.4 %
NS 8.3%
1
2 9.1%
3 63.65
4 36.4%
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
11
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
I. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 12A scores for student reach and pass the target score to exhibit success for this
CLO.
10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
12A Students exhibit high success, which reflects an excellent level of achieved
goals.
J. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 12A scores for students reach and surpass the target score.
10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
12A students successfully reached the goals set for this CLO.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Students have reached or surpassed the expected scores for this CLO.
10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have successful attained the goals in this CLO.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
13. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
No changes were necessary due to success in the CLOs.
14. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
The assessment revealed success in all 3 CLOs and no actions are necessary.
15. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
12
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:_ Continue with successful course and program strengths. __
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 12B
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO USE SOME OF THE
LESS OBVIOUS DYNAMICS OF COMPOSITION
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO INTERPRET THE
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3&4
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
100% 4
3&4
100% 4
VARIOUS WAYS ART HAS BEEN USED AS A VEHICLE OF
EXPRESSION.
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL DEVELOP AND BUILD UPON THE 3 & 4 75%
VISUAL DIALOGUE LEARNED FROM THE MASTER PAINTERS.
(CLO) 4:
100% 4
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
13
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
K. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
11. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 12B scores in this CLO pass the target score to exhibit success for this class.
12. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
12B students exhibit very high success, which reflects an excellent level of
achieved goals.
L. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
11. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 12B CLO2 scores for students surpassed the target scores.
12. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
12B students successfully reached the goals set for this CLO.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
11. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Students have surpassed the expected scores for this CLO.
12. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
That the student have successfully attained the goals in this CLO.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
16. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
No changes were necessary due to success in these CLOs.
17. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
The assessment revealed success in all 3 CLOs and no actions or changes are
necessary.
18. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
14
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other: Continue with existing 3 CLOs due to students’ success.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 12C
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thielr, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
THIS COURSE IS PART OF A FOUR-LEVEL SEQUENCE. IN THIS CASE, THERE WERE
NO STUDENTS IN THIS LEVEL.
THE LEVELS ARE NORMALLY TAUGHT
CONCURRENTLY.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO BEGIN THE
PROCESS OF COMBINING THE PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT OF
SOCIETY WITH THEIR OWN PAINTING.
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO BEGIN TO
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3 & 4 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
N/A
3 & 4 75%
N/A
3 & 4 75%
N/A
REPLICATE SPECIFIC PERSPECTIVAL STRATEGIES TO ALTER
2-DIMENSIONAL PICTURES PLANE INTO AN
ILLUSTRATIONAL DIMENSIONAL SPACE.
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY ONE’S
OWN DEVELOPING ARTISTIC ASSUMPTIONS.
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
15
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
M. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
13. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 12C had no students during Spring 2014.
14. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
N/A
N. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
13. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 12C had no students during Spring 2014.
14. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
N/A
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
13. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 12C had no students during the Spring 2014.
14. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
N/A
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
19. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
No changes were necessary.
20. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
N/A
21. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
16




Resource based
Change to CLO or rubric
Change to assessment methods
Other:_________________________________________________________________
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 12D
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3 & 4 75%
N/A
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO PAINT SUBJECTS OF
SEVERAL GENRE.
3 & 4 75%
N/A
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO DEMONSTRATE A
3 & 4 75%
N/A
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1:STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO GRASP AND
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
PRODUCE WORKS OF ART THAT COMBINE THE
PSYCHOLOGICAL IMPACT OF SOCIETY WITH THEIR OWN
PAINTINGS.
THOROUGH APPRECIATION OF THE VALUE OF THE
CONCEPTUAL AND EMOTIONAL IDEAS OF THEIR PAINTINGS.
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
This course is part of a 4-level sequence, normally taught concurrently.
17
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
O. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
15. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 12D had no students during Spring 2014.
16. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
N/A
P. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
15. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 12D had no students during the Spring 2014.
16. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
N/A
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
15. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 12D had no students during Spring 2014.
16. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
N/A
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
22. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
ART 12D had no students during Spring 2014.
23. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
N/A
24. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
18





Pedagogical
Resource based
Change to CLO or rubric
Change to assessment methods
Other:_________________________________________________________________
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 13A
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: STUDENTS WILL KNOW COLOR THEORY AND ITS
APPLICATION TO PRACTICAL COLOR MIXING AND COLOR
SCHEMES.
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3 & 4 75%
3 & 4 75%
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL KNOW ELEMENTS OF
COMPOSITION.
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL LEARN AND MASTER THE BASIC 3 & 4 75%
PAINTING TECHNIQUES, SUCH AS LAYERING, GLAZING,
ABSTRACT, AND PHOTO REALISM.
(CLO) 4:
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
2 9.1%
3 45.4%
4 45.4%
3
4
3
4
72.7%
27.3 %
54.6%
45.4%
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
19
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
Q. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
17. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 13A scores for student reach surpass the target scores for this CLO.
18. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
13A students exhibit high success which reflects an excellent level of achieved
goals.
R. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
17. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 13A scores for students reach & surpass the target scores to exhibit success.
18. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
13A students successfully reached the goals set for this CLO.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
17. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Students have reached or surpassed the expected scores for this CLO.
18. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
That the students have successfully attained the goals in this CLO.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
25. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
No changes were necessary due to success by the students in these CLOs.
26. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
The assessments revealed success in all three CLOs and no actions are changes
are necessary.
27. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
20
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:__ No changes__
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 13B
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO IMPLEMENT COLOR
RELATION BEYOND SIMPLE THEORETICAL MODELS.
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO INTERPRET THE
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3 & 4 75%
100% 4
3 & 4 75%
33.3 %
66.7%
3 & 4 75%
100% 4
VARIOUS WAYS ART HAS BEEN USED AS A VEHICLE OF
EXPRESSION.
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL APPLY ALL THE BASIC
PAINTING TECHNIQUES DEVELOPED FROM 13A AND APPLY
THESE SKILLS IN A MORE PERSONAL, INDIVIDUAL
OUTLOOK.
(CLO) 4:
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
3
4
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
21
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
S. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
19. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 13B scores in this CLO surpass the target score.
20. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
13B students exhibit very high success. Which reflects an excellent level of
achieved goals.
T. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
19. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 13B CLOs scores for students surpassed the target scores.
20. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
13B students successfully reached the goals set for this CLO.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
19. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Students in 13B have reached or surpassed the expected scores for this CLO.
20. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students have successfully attained the goals in this CLO.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
28. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
No changes are necessary due to success in these three CLOs.
29. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
The assessments revealed success in all three CLOs and no action or change are
necessary.
30. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
22
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other: Continue with the existing three CLOs due to success by students.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 13C
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO USE TERMINOLOGY,
TOOLS, TECHNIQUES, SUPPORT, AND GROUNDS FOR
ACRYLIC PAINTING WITH COMPETENCE.
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL COMPLETE PAINTINGS IN ALL
GENRE.
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO BEGIN THE
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3-4 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
100% 3
3-4 75%
100% 3
3-4 75%
100% 3
PROCESS OF USING PERSONNEL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL
VIEWPOINTS TO CREATE THEIR PAINTINGS.
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
23
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
U. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
21. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 13C scores in this CLO pass the target scores.
22. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
13C students exhibit very high success, which reflects an excellent level of
achieved goals.
V. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
21. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 13C CLO2 scores for students surpass the target score.
22. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
13C students successfully reached the goals set for this CLO.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
21. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Students in this CLO have reached or surpassed the expected scores for this CLO.
22. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Students have successfully attained the goals in this CLO.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
31. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
No changes were necessary.
32. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
The assessment revealed high success in all three CLOs and no actions or changes
are necessary.
33. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
24
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:_ Continue with the established CLOs, no changes necessary.
Course
Art 13D
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO ALTER A
PAINTINGS’ 2-DIMENSIONAL SURFACE TO REPRESENT AN
ILLUSIONISTIC 3-DIMENSIONAL SPACE.
(CLO) 2: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO EXPRESS AN
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3 & 4 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
100%
3 & 4 75%
100% 3
3 & 4 75%
100% 3
4
APPRECIATION OF THE VALUE OF CONCEPTIONAL AND
EMOTIONAL ASSUMPTIONS OF ONES’ SELF AND OTHER
PAINTERS.
(CLO) 3: STUDENTS WILL BE ABLE TO MASTER THE
PROCESS OF USING PERSONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL
VIEWPOINTS TO CREATE THEIR PAINTINGS.
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
25
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
W. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
23. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 13D scores were very high for this CLO.
24. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
13D students exhibit high scores and reflect excellent level of achieved goals.
X. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
23. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
ART 13D scores for student reach and surpass the target score.
24. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
13D students have successfully reached the goals set for this CLO.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
23. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Students have reached or surpassed the expected scores for this CLO.
24. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
The students have successfully attained the goals in this CLO.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
34. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
No changes were necessary due to success in these three CLOs.
35. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
The assessments revealed success in all three CDs and no actions or changes are
necessary.
36. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
26
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other: Continue with successful courses and program strengths. __
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 2A
Fall 2013
4
4
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: DRAW SUCCESSFULLY USING SKILL OF EYE TO
HAND COORDINATION USING THE ELEMENTS OF LINE,
SHAPE, VALUE, TEXTURE, AND SPACE CREATING A
REALISTIC DRAWING IN BLACK AND WHITE.
(CLO) 2: DEMONSTRATE THE SKILL OF HAND AND EYE
COORDINATION IN REALISM DRAWING.
(CLO) 3: ORGANIZE A WELL-COMPOSED COMPOSITION
THAT REFLECTS THE BASIC ELEMENTS.
(CLO) 4: CREATE THE ILLUSION OF A THREEDIMENSIONAL FORM AND SPACE ON A TWO-DIMENSIONAL
SURFACE IN BLACK AND WHITE.
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3 & 4s 75%
3 & 4s 75%
3 & 4s 75%
3 & 4s 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
35.7% 3
64.3% 4
35.7%
64.3%
28.6%
76.4%
21.4%
78.6%
3
4
3
4
3
4
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
27
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
Y. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
25. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Meet or exceed.
26. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We are doing a good job.
Z. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
25. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
They meet or exceed.
26. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We are doing a good job.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
25. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
They meet or exceed.
26. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We are doing a good job.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
They meet or exceed.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We are doing a good job.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
37. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
28
None needed.
38. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
We are doing a good job. No actions are needed.
39. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:_Keep things the same. No actions are needed.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 2B
Fall 2013
4
4
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: DRAW SUCCESSFULLY USING INTERMEDIATE
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3 & 4s 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
100% 4
3 & 4s 75%
100% 4
3 & 4s 75%
100% 4
3 & 4s 75%
100% 4
SKILL OF EYE TO HAND COORDINATION USING THE
ELEMENTS OF LINE, SHAPE, VALUE, TEXTURE, 2ND SPACE
CREATING A REALISTIC DRAWING IN BLACK AND WHITE
AND COLOR MEDIA.
(CLO) 2: DEMONSTRATE AN IMPROVED SKILL OF HAND
AND EYE COORDINATION.
(CLO) 3: CORRECTLY ARTICULATE COLOR THEORY AND
PICTORIAL USES OF COLOR IN DRAWING.
(CLO) 4: DEMONSTRATE SKILL IN USING GRAPHITE AND
PASTEL ART AT AN INTERMEDIATE LEVEL.
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
29
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
AA.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
27. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Meet or exceed.
28. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We are doing a great job.
BB.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
27. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
They meet or exceed.
28. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We are doing a great job.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
27. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
They meet or exceed.
28. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We are doing a great job.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
They meet or exceed.
4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We are doing a great job.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
40. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
30
None needed.
41. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
We are doing a great job. No actions are needed.
42. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:_Keep things the same. No actions are needed.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 2C
Spring 2014
3
3
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: CREATE A COHERENT BODY OF ACADEMIC
REALISM DRAWINGS.
(CLO) 2: DEVELOP WAYS TO CRITIQUE OWN WORK FOR
SELF-IMPROVEMENT.
(CLO) 3: DRAW SUCCESSFULLY USING ADVANCED SKILLS
OF EYE-TO-HAND COORDINATION USING THE ELEMENTS OF
LINE, SHAPE, TEXTURE, 2ND SPACE CREATING A REALISTIC
DRAWING IN BLACK AND WHITE AND/OR COLOR MEDIA.
(CLO) 4: ORGANIZE A PROFESSIONAL PRESENTATION
FOR SHOWCASING THE FINAL DRAWINGS. .
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3 & 4s 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
100% 4
3 & 4s 75%
100% 4
3 & 4s 75%
100% 4
3 & 4s 75%
100% 4
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
31
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
CC.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
29. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Meet or exceed.
30. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We are doing a great job.
DD.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
29. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
They meet or exceed.
30. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We are doing a great job.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
29. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
They meet or exceed.
30. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We are doing a great job.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
They meet or exceed.
6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We are doing a great job.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
32
43. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
None needed.
44. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
We are doing a great job. No actions are needed.
45. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:_Keep things the same. No actions are needed.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 3A
Fall 2013
2
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Mendenhall
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: DRAW THE HUMAN FORM ACCURATELY AND IN
AN ANATOMICALLY CORRECT WAY.
(CLO) 2: COORDINATE EYE AND HAND SKILLS, THEY
DESIGN A FIGURE COMPOSITION.
(CLO) 3: DRAW A FIGURE COMPOSITION BASED ON A
CLEAR AND PRECISE DESIGN.
(CLO) 4: COORDINATE EYE AND HAND SKILLS.
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3-4 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
89.5%
3-4 75%
89.5%
3-4 75%
89.5%
3-4 75%
89.5
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
33
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
EE.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
31. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
32. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
FF.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
31. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
32. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
31. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
32. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
46. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
34
No change required due to excellent student success.
47. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
Assessment reflections show a healthy understanding and a high success rate by a
large majority of students.
48. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:No changes made.__
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 17A
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: REDUCE THREE DIMENSIONAL SCULPTURES
USING HAND-BUILDING TECHNIQUES WITH SURFACE
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3-4 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
3 13.8%
4 82.8%
DECORATION THAT SHOWS AN UNDERSTANDING OF
CERAMIC GLAZE AND FIRING TECHNOLOGY.
(CLO) 2: CRITIQUE MASTERPIECES AND STUDENT
3-4 75%
3 36.4%
4 63.6%
3-4 75%
3 24.1%
4 72.4%
SCULPTURES INCORPORATING ELEMENTS AND PRINCIPLES
OF 3-DIMENSIONAL DESIGN USING CERAMIC
TERMINOLOGY.
(CLO) 3:EXPRESS CREATIVE CONCEPTS
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
35
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
GG.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
33. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
34. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
HH.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
33. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
34. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
33. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
34. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
49. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
An attempt to make critiques more quantifiable.
50. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
Critiques are an extremely important learning exercise.
51. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
36
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other: No change needed.____________
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 23
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: DEVELOP PAINTING, DRAWING, AND COLLAGE,
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3-4 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
100%
AND ASSEMBLY TECHNIQUES ALONG WITH INDIVIDUAL
STYLE AND CONTENT.
(CLO) 2: DESIGN UNIQUE COMPOSITIONS, USING THE
3-4 75%
3 36.8%
4 57.9%
3-4 75%
3 22.2%
4 55.6%
ELEMENTS AND PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN THAT SHOW
CRAFTSMANSHIP AND ATTENTION TO DETAIL.
(CLO) 3: WRITE A FORMAL ANALYSIS OF A WORK OF ART
THAT DESCRIBES ELEMENTS AND PRINCIPLES OF DESIGN
RELATED TO THE CONTENT INTENDED BY THE ARTIST.
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
37
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
II. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
35. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
36. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
JJ. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
35. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
36. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
35. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
36. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
52. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
There were no changes needed in the last cycle.
53. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
None.
54. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
38
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other: No change needed._____
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
ART 20
Spring 2013
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: CRITIQUE MASTERPIECES AND STUDENT
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3-4 75%
SCULPTURES INCORPORATING ELEMENTS AND PRINCIPLES
OF THREE DIMENSIONAL DESIGN AND USING SCULPTURE
TERMINOLOGY.
(CLO) 2: EXPRESS CREATIVE CONCEPTS
3-4 75%
(CLO) 3: FURTHER DEVELOP EXISTING SKILLS AND
3-4 75%
TECHNIQUES BY EXPLORING MATERIALS BEYOND
TRADITIONAL MEDIA SUCH AS WOOD, STONE, AND BRONZE.
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
3 25.0%
4 58.3%
3
4
3
4
8.3%
91.7%
25.0%
58.3%
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
39
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
KK.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
37. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
38. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
LL.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
37. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
38. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
37. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
38. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
55. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
During the last cycle, I recommended that beginners might do better if they took ART17
Beginning Sculpture first.
56. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
We added a prerequisite to this course with favorable impact.
57. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
40
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other: No new changes made_____________________________________
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art16A
Fall 2013
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: ACHIEVE BASIC SKILLS OF WHEEL-THROWN
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3-4 75%
FORMS.
(CLO) 2: ACHIEVE TRIMMING SKILLS WHICH EXHIBIT
CRAFTMENTSHIP.
(CLO) 3: ACHIEVE GLAZING SKILLS, WHICH EXHIBIT A
KNOWLEDGE OF GLAZE AND ITS REACTION TO FIRE.
(CLO) 4: ACHIEVE BASIC TECHNICAL SKILLS IN HAND
BUILDING FORMS.
3-4 75%
3-4 75%
3-4 75%
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
3 33.3%
4 46.7%
3
4
3
4
3
4
40.0%
40.0%
40.0%
33.3%
46.2%
30.8%
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
41
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
MM.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
39. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Exceeded target.
40. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
NN.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
39. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Exceeded target.
40. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
39. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Only 73% of students scored a 3 or 4.
40. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
There are any number of glaze combinations that require repeated
experimentation to master glazing pottery. The more sections of ART16 offered,
the more frequently the kiln gets fired, the more changes to experiment. One
section per semester is not enough.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
42
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
58. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
I was not teaching this course in the last cycle.
59. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
Offer more sections of ART16.
60. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other: No changes made.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop”
discussion
Art 18A
Spring 2014
1
1
100%
Fall 2014
Thiel, Golojich, Komisar,
Esquierido
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
3-4 75%
80%
(CLO) 2: PRODUCE 3 DIMENSIONAL SCULPTURES IN BASRELIEF SURFACE DECORATION.
3-4 75%
80%
(CLO) 3: CRITIQUE MASTERPIECES AND STUDENT
3-4 75%
80%
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY
(THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1:PRODUCE 3 DIMENSIONAL SCULPTURES USING
TRADITIONAL MEDIA, WOOD, AND STONE TO DEVELOP
CRAFTMANSHIP AND EXERCISE CREATIVITY AND PERSONAL
EXPRESSION.
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
SCULPTURES INCORPORATING ELEMENTS AND PRINCIPLES
OF 3-DIMENSIONAL DESIGN TERMINOLOGY.
(CLO) 4:
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for
this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the
eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle?
43
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
OO.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
41. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Exceeded target.
42. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
PP.
COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
41. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Exceeded target.
42. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
41. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this
course level outcome?
Target exceeded.
42. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
No change needed.
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
61. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the
prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
No change needed.
62. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
None.
63. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
44
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
X Other:__ No changes made.
Appendix C: Program Learning Outcomes
Considering your feedback, findings, and/or information that has arisen from the course level
discussions, please reflect on each of your Program Level Outcomes.
Program: Studio Art
Program: Art – Emphasis in Ceramics
Program: Art – Emphasis in Painting
Program: Art – Emphasis in Sculpture

PLO #1: Demonstrate visual literacy and explain it in terms of the elements and
principles of design.


PLO #2: Demonstrate an ability to work with the media (drawing, painting, clay, etc.)
of the discipline.

PLO #3:

PLO #4:
What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions?
What measures can be taken to improve student access to our program?
What program-level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed?
Both PLO’s are integrated in all of the Art classes offered. Students are very
successful when they have the access to the offered classes.
What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of
students completing your program?
We are asking for additional full time faculty and more classes so students have access to
courses to complete their programs.
45