Chabot College Program Review Report 2015 ‐2016 Year One of Architecture & Interior Design Program Review Cycle One Submitted on October 21, 2014 Contact: Adrian W. Huang 1 Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course‐Level Assessment Reflections. Course INTD 50 Semester assessment data gathered Fall 2013 Number of sections offered in the semester 1 Number of sections assessed 1 Percentage of sections assessed 100% Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion Fall 2014 Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion Adrian Huang, Marilena Williams Form Instructions:  Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course‐Level assessment reported in this Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule.  Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen.  Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual CLO.  Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole. PART I: COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS CONSIDER THE COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE) (CLO) 1: Actual Scores** (eLumen data) Defined Target Scores* (CLO Goal) 75% 66% 75% 66% 75% 66% Explain the principles of space as it relates to the utility, economy, beauty and character of living environments. (CLO) 2: Design group and private spaces and explain the demands that group activities place on space relationships. (CLO) 3: Draw floor plans and elevations. (CLO) 4:  If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table. * Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4) **Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle? 2 3 PART II: COURSE‐ LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS A. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1: 1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 66% success. The lower rate of achievement was due to lack of drafting skills. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. We positively need to add a hand‐drafting course. 2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. B. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2: 1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 66% success. The lower rate of achievement was due to lack of drafting skills. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. We positively need to add a hand‐drafting course. 2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. 4 C. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3: 1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 66% success. The lower rate of achievement was due to lack of drafting skills. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. 2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. D. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4: 1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? 2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? E. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED. 5 PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS 1. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions? We will continue to request the additional resources necessary to offer this essential core course. 2. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course‐level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights? Students with strong drafting skills will be able to work on projects that are more complex. 3. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?  Curricular  Pedagogical Resource based  Change to CLO or rubric  Change to assessment methods Other: We need to offer a Hand Drafting because students with strong drafting skills will be able to work on projects that are more complex. Course Semester assessment data gathered Number of sections offered in the semester Number of sections assessed INTD 52 Spring 2014 1 1 6 Percentage of sections assessed 100% Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion Fall 2014 Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion Adrian Huang, Marilena Williams Form Instructions:  Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course‐Level assessment reported in this Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule.  Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen.  Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual CLO.  Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole. PART I: COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS CONSIDER THE COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE) (CLO) 1: Actual Scores** (eLumen data) Defined Target Scores* (CLO Goal) 75% 85% 75% 85% 75% 85% Describe dates, styles, and art monuments as related to furnishings. (CLO) 2: Explain the relationship between European and American furniture design (CLO) 3: On average, students achieved 85% success. The lower rate of achievement was due to lack of drafting skills. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. We positively need to add a hand‐drafting course. (CLO) 4:  If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table. * Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4) **Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle? 7 PART II: COURSE‐ LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS C. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1: 3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 85% success. 4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? This reflected the course materials and learning outcome would be continuing to offer. D. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2: 3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 85% success. 4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? This reflected the course materials and learning outcome would be continuing to offer. 8 C. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3: 3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 85% success. 4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? This reflected the course materials and learning outcome would be continuing to offer. D. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4: 3. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? 4. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? E. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED. 9 PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS 4. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions? We will continue to request the additional resources necessary to offer this essential core course. 5. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course‐level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights? Students with strong drafting skills will be able to work on projects that are more complex. 6. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?  Curricular  Pedagogical Resource based  Change to CLO or rubric  Change to assessment methods ☐Other: 10 Course INTD 54 Semester assessment data gathered Fall 2013 Number of sections offered in the semester 1 Number of sections assessed 1 Percentage of sections assessed 100% Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion Fall 2014 Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion Adrian Huang, Debbie Norris Form Instructions:  Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course‐Level assessment reported in this Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule.  Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen.  Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual CLO.  Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole. PART I: COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS CONSIDER THE COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE) (CLO) 1: Actual Scores** (eLumen data) Defined Target Scores* (CLO Goal) 75% 61.5% 75% 64% 75% 86% Students will learn about the professionof Interior Design, through an Interview process
(CLO) 2: Students will become proficient in major periods of Interior Design (CLO) 3: Students will use their learned knowledge of the color wheel to create their version of the colorwheel.. (ie: Analogous,complementary, triad) (CLO) 4:  If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table. 11 * Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4) **Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle? PART II: COURSE‐ LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS E. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1: 5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 61.5% success. The lower rate of achievement was due to lack of drafting skills. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. We positively need to add a hand‐drafting course. 6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. F. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2: 5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 64% success. The lower rate of achievement was due to lack of drafting skills. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. We positively need to add a hand‐drafting course. 6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. 12 C. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3: 5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 86% success. 6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? Successful course materials and presentations. D. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4: 5. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? 6. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? E. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED. 13 PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS 7. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions? We will continue to request the additional resources necessary to offer this essential core course. 8. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course‐level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights? Students with strong drafting skills will be able to work on projects that are more complex. 9. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?  Curricular  Pedagogical Resource based  Change to CLO or rubric  Change to assessment methods ☐Other: Course INTD 55 Semester assessment data gathered Fall 2013 Number of sections offered in the semester 1 Number of sections assessed 1 Percentage of sections assessed 100% 14 Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion Fall 2014 Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion Adrian Huang, Gus Vouchilas Form Instructions:  Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course‐Level assessment reported in this Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule.  Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen.  Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual CLO.  Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole. PART I: COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS CONSIDER THE COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE) (CLO) 1: Defined Target Scores* (CLO Goal) 75% Actual Scores** (eLumen data) 78% 75% 88% 75% 34% 75% 100% Identify specific fiber characteristics, structure, and properties. (CLO) 2: Explain the expected performance of natural and synthetic fibers and their properties and the necessity of labeling; identify fabric weaves and other construction; explain legal constraint on textile and apparel manufacturers. (CLO) 3: Describe the problems relating to the use and care of fabric finishes;describe how designs are applied through dyeing and printing; (CLO) 4: Identify the important fabric resources and the role they plan in the total fashion manufacturing process and in fashion merchandising  If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table. * Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4) **Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle? 15 PART II: COURSE‐ LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS G. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1: 7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 78% success. 8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? Continue to offer Introduction to Textiles in this program. H. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2: 7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 88% success. 8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? Successful course materials and presentations. 16 C. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3: 7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 34% success. The lower rate of achievement was due to lack of reference material book in the library. 8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? Will order more reference books and make them available to students for more reading references. D. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4: 7. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 100% success. 8. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? Successful course lecture materials. E. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED. 17 PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS 10. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions? We will continue to request the additional resources necessary to offer this essential core course. 11. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course‐level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights? Students with more reference books will be able to enhance on the presentations. 12. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?  Curricular  Pedagogical Resource based  Change to CLO or rubric  Change to assessment methods ☐Other 18 Course INTD 62 Semester assessment data gathered Fall 2013 Number of sections offered in the semester 1 Number of sections assessed 1 Percentage of sections assessed 100% Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion Fall 2014 Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion Adrian Huang, Debbie Norris Form Instructions:  Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course‐Level assessment reported in this Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule.  Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen.  Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual CLO.  Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole. PART I: COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS CONSIDER THE COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE) (CLO) 1: Actual Scores** (eLumen data) Defined Target Scores* (CLO Goal) 75% 100% 75% 100% 75% 56.25% 75% 62.5% Student will learn & understand the NKBAPlanning Guidelines & graphic standards
(CLO) 2: Student will become proficient at measuring and reporting existing measurements (CLO) 3: Student will design & produce working drawings of a Kitchen space
(CLO) 4: Student will design & produce working drawings of a Bath space
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table. 19 
Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4) **Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle? PART II: COURSE‐ LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS I. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1: 9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 100% success. 10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? Continue to offer NKBA guidelines and design in this course. J. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2: 9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 100% success.. 10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? Reflects the good programmatic strengths with this course level. 20 C. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3: 9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 56.25% success. The lower rate of achievement was due to lack of drafting skills. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. 10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. D. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4: 9. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 62.5% success. The lower rate of achievement was due to lack of drafting skills. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. 10. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. E. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED. 21 PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS 13. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions? We will continue to request the additional resources necessary to offer this essential core course. 14. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course‐level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights? Students with strong drafting skills will be able to work on projects that are more complex. 15. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?  Curricular  Pedagogical Resource based  Change to CLO or rubric  Change to assessment methods Other: We need to offer a Hand Drafting because students with strong drafting skills will be able to work on projects that are more complex. 22 Course INTD 66 Semester assessment data gathered Fall 2013 Number of sections offered in the semester 1 Number of sections assessed 1 Percentage of sections assessed 100% Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion Fall 2014 Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion Adrian Huang, Marilena Williams Form Instructions:  Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course‐Level assessment reported in this Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule.  Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen.  Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual CLO.  Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole. PART I: COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS CONSIDER THE COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE) (CLO) 1: Actual Scores** (eLumen data) Defined Target Scores* (CLO Goal) 75% 88% 75% 88% 75% 88% Evaluate a building and make concrete suggestions about how it could be retrofitted to provide access for a physically disabled or elderly person. (CLO) 2: Design a dwelling for a person with limited access or with some type of physical impairment (CLO) 3: Design a dwelling, which will enable an aging individual to live independently in the home. (CLO) 4:  If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table. * Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4) **Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle? 23 PART II: COURSE‐ LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS K. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1: 11. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 88% success. Even thought this is a great achievement but the drafting skills are still a concern. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. We positively need to add a hand‐drafting course. 12. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. L. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2: 11. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 88% success. Even thought this is a great achievement but the drafting skills are still a concern. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. We positively need to add a hand‐drafting course. 12. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. 24 C. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3: 11. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 88% success. Even thought this is a great achievement but the drafting skills are still a concern. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. We positively need to add a hand‐drafting course. 12. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. D. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4: 11. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? 12. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? E. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED. 25 PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS 16. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions? We will continue to request the additional resources necessary to offer this essential core course. 17. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course‐level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights? Students with strong drafting skills will be able to work on projects that are more complex. 18. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?  Curricular  Pedagogical Resource based  Change to CLO or rubric  Change to assessment methods Other: We need to offer a Hand Drafting because students with strong drafting skills will be able to work on projects that are more complex. 26 Course INTD 70 Semester assessment data gathered Fall 2013 Number of sections offered in the semester 1 Number of sections assessed 1 Percentage of sections assessed 100% Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion Fall 2014 Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion Adrian Huang, Debbie Norris Form Instructions:  Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course‐Level assessment reported in this Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule.  Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen.  Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual CLO.  Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole. PART I: COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS CONSIDER THE COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE) (CLO) 1: Actual Scores** (eLumen data) Defined Target Scores* (CLO Goal) 75% 80% 75% 80% 75% 40% Student will design & produce working drawings for a Kitchen project, using NKBA standards
(CLO) 2: Student will design & produce working drawings for a Bathproject, using NKBA standards (CLO) 3: D Student will apply their knowledge of the NKBA Planning Guidelines, Graphics & Professional Resource Library & prep for AKBD (CLO) 4:  If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table. * Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4) **Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle? 27 PART II: COURSE‐ LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS M. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1: 13. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 80% success. Even thought this is a great achievement but the drafting skills are still a concern. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. We positively need to add a hand‐drafting course. 14. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. N. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2: 13. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 80% success. Even thought this is a great achievement but the drafting skills are still a concern. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. We positively need to add a hand‐drafting course. 14. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. 28 C. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3: 13. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 40% success. The lower rate of achievement was due to lack of drafting skills. The Interior Design Program offers a variety of classes, none of which gives the student a solid base in drafting that is necessary to their success. 14. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? If we will offer a Hand Drafting class, students will develop the necessary drafting skills to successfully complete any certification/degree offered by Chabot College. In addition, completion of this new course would greatly enhance each student's ability to meet the requirements of transfer to a four‐year college. D. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4: 13. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? 14. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? E. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED. 29 PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS 19. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions? We will continue to request the additional resources necessary to offer this essential core course. 20. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course‐level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights? Students with strong drafting skills will be able to work on projects that are more complex. 21. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?  Curricular  Pedagogical Resource based  Change to CLO or rubric  Change to assessment methods Other: We need to offer a Hand Drafting because students with strong drafting skills will be able to work on projects that are more complex. 30 Course INTD 72 Semester assessment data gathered Fall 2013 Number of sections offered in the semester 1 Number of sections assessed 1 Percentage of sections assessed 100% Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion Fall 2014 Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion Adrian Huang, Marilena Williams Form Instructions:  Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course‐Level assessment reported in this Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule.  Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all sections assessed in eLumen.  Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual CLO.  Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as a whole. PART I: COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS CONSIDER THE COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE) (CLO) 1: Actual Scores** (eLumen data) Defined Target Scores* (CLO Goal) 75% 100% 75% 100% 75% 100% Develop floor plans, electrical plans and interior elevations of a commercial space (CLO) 2: Use space planning to develop furniture layouts of a commercial space (CLO) 3: Explain how to specify commercial materials and furnishings (CLO) 4:  If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table. * Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO? (Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4) **Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen data collected in this assessment cycle? 31 PART II: COURSE‐ LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS O. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1: 15. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 100% success. 16. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? Continue to offer NKBA guidelines and design in this course. P. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2: 15. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 100% success. 16. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? Reflects the good programmatic strengths with this course level. 32 C. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3: 15. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? On average, students achieved 100% success. 16. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? Reflects the good programmatic strengths with this course level. D. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4: 15. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course level outcome? 16. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have? E. COURSE‐LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5: ADD IF NEEDED. 33 PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS 22. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions? We will continue to request the additional resources necessary to offer this essential core course. 23. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course‐level and programmatic strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights? Students with strong drafting skills will be able to work on projects that are more complex. 24. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?  Curricular  Pedagogical Resource based  Change to CLO or rubric  Change to assessment methods ☐Other 34 Appendix C: Program Learning Outcomes Considering your feedback, findings, and/or information that has arisen from the course level discussions, please reflect on each of your Program Level Outcomes. Program: _AS in Interior Design_____  PLO #1: Develop functional interior spaces

PLO #2: Draw appropriate floor plans

PLO #3: 
PLO #4: What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions? A needs to offer fundamental hand‐drafting class for Interior Design program and it is recommended by NKBA accreditation team. What program‐level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? Students will be able to take on more complex project with a new hand‐drafting class. What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of students completing your program? Will propose and offer a new hand‐drafting class (INTD 46). Program: _____  PLO #1: 
PLO #2: 
PLO #3: 
PLO #4: 35 What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions? What program‐level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of students completing your program? 36