Chabot College
Program Review Report
2015 -2016
Year 3 of
Program Review Cycle
Nursing
Submitted on 10/24/2014
Contact: Connie Telles
Nursing Program Director and Nursing
Faculty
Table of Contents
__X_ Year 3
Section A: What Have We Accomplished?
Section B: What’s Next?
Required Appendices:
A: Budget History
B1: Course Learning Outcomes Assessment Schedule
B2: “Closing the Loop” Assessment Reflections
C: Program Learning Outcomes
D: A Few Questions
E: New Initiatives
F1: New Faculty Requests
F2: Classified Staffing Requests
F3: FTEF Requests
F4: Academic Learning Support Requests
F5: Supplies and Services Requests
F6: Conference/Travel Requests
F7: Technology and Other Equipment Requests
F8: Facilities
X__ YEAR THREE
A. What Have We Accomplished?
Complete Appendices A (Budget History), B1 and B2 (CLO's), C (PLO's), and D (A few questions) prior to
writing your narrative. You should also review your most recent success, equity, course sequence, and
enrollment data at http://www.chabotcollege.edu/ProgramReview/Data2013.cfm.
In year one, you established goals and action plans for program improvement. This section asks
you to reflect on the progress you have made toward those goals. This analysis will be used by
the PRBC and Budget Committee to assess progress toward achievement of our Strategic Plan
and to inform future budget decisions. It will also be used by the SLOAC and Basic Skills
committees as input to their priority-setting process. In your narrative of two or less pages,
address the following questions:
1. What program improvement goals did you establish?
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Increase student retention
Replace Maternity Instructor
Evaluate and update the merit admission criteria
Evaluate existing curriculum-transfer to CSUEB streamlined
Open house and BBQ for new students
Use simulation lab as part of a community outreach for the hospitals and get funds to
maintain equipment
Provide counseling hours for students experiencing high levels of stress
2. Did you achieve the goals you established for the three years? Specifically describe
your progress on goals you set for student learning, program learning, and Strategic
Plan achievement.
•
•
•
•
Goal 1: Increase student retention
Achieved: Retention has increase from 40% attrition to 20-30%attrition. We
provided tutors, extra hours of skills lab, seminars for test taking skills and stress
reduction workshops.
Goal 2: Replace Maternity Instructor
• Achieved: Hired full-time tenure track content expert faculty member
Goal 3: Evaluate and update the merit admission criteria
• Achieved: Criteria for admission for fall 2015 has been reviewed and updated.
Goal 4: Evaluate existing curriculum-transfer to CSUEB streamlined
• Achieved: Roadmap for transition to CSUEB was updated in September 2014. The
information is posted on the nursing website
1
•
•
•
Goal 5: Open house and BBQ for new students
• Achieved annually in August
Goal 6: Use simulation lab as part of a community outreach for the hospitals and get
funds to maintain equipment
• Not achieved. Simulation lab is funded with grant money. Local hospitals are
going through dramatic changes.
Goal 7: Provide counseling hours for students experiencing high levels of stress
• Not achieved: Fall and spring of 2014 we did have a counselor. This semester is
half over and the program just recently got a counselor for nursing but she is
leaving the college in 2 weeks.
What best practices have you developed? Those could include pedagogical methods,
strategies to address Basic Skills needs of our students, methods of working within your
discipline, and more.
Our best practices are based on the requirements mandated by the California Board of
Registered Nursing (BRN). They include Quality, Safety and Education in Nursing, the Nurse
Practice Act and integration of a theoretical model (Roy) into our conceptual framework.
•
•
•
Are these best practices replicable in other disciplines or areas?
• NO
What were your greatest challenges?
• The ability to hire enough faculty as required by the BRN
• We continue to have overloads in teaching assignments
Were there institutional barriers to success?
• Difficult communication with administration(not division dean): emails not
returned
• Lack of responsiveness by administration to nursing program needs ( not division
dean)
• Difficulty getting purchase orders, supplies, disbursement of grant funds in a
timely manner
• Delay at the District Office in getting new faculty hired and new sites approved
• Low salary for nursing faculty does not meet what a nurse can make in the
hospital setting
Cite relevant data in your narrative (e.g., efficiency, persistence, success, FT/PT faculty ratios,
CLO/PLO assessment results, external accreditation demands, etc.).
The Board of Registered Nursing made the five year accreditation visit in May 2014. We
have continued approval for the next five years. The BRN was very complimentary of our
nursing program; however the BRN requires that we have enough faculty and funding to
meet the needs of the students.
2
B. What’s Next?
This section may serve as the foundation for your next Program Review cycle, and will inform the
development of future strategic initiatives for the college. In your narrative of one page or less, address
the following questions. Please complete Appendices E (New Initiatives) and F1-8 (Resources Requested)
to further detail your narrative and to request resources.
Note: Chabot is in the process of creating our next Educational Master Plan, to last six years.
Educational Master Plans are generally large enough in scope to be flexible. They are used in
particular at the District Level to guide in facility and community planning.
Please take this moment to reflect on your program’s larger term vision(s) and goals (6 years),
and to incorporate them into Program Review under the section “The Difference We Hope to
Make” as a separate paragraph or otherwise. The drafters of the Educational Master Plan will
be mining Program Review for contributions to the plan, with a commitment to read what
programs have submitted. IR has offered to work with programs to determine future market
trends to be incorporated into this year’s program review in relation to long-term goals. Please
contact Carolyn Arnold for support. We will have other avenues to communicate with the
Educational Master Plan Consultants. This is simply one avenue.
•
What goals do you have for future program improvement?
o Continue with high student success on NCLEX-RN exam
o Continue with increased student success and retention
o Continue to develop nursing students into clinically competent RN’s
o Implement a pathway to a Bachelors Program. We need other schools as CSUEB
cannot absorb all the students from our program that want a BSN
•
What ideas do you have to achieve those goals?
o Hire sufficient faculty to meet the needs of the program and the BRN
requirements
o More access for our students to attend a program to continue on to a Bachelor’s
degree in nursing
o Continue with support in the clinical area with the medication pass instructors
o Continue with a ratio of 1:8 in the clinical area
o Collaborate with clinical facilities to ensure continued clinical placement of our
students
o Collaborate with the director of the nursing program at Ohlone College to
facilitate a pathway for students to get a BSN
•
What must change about the institution to enable you to make greater progress in
improving student learning and overall student success?
o Responsiveness from administration in a timely manner
o Funding to continue student success
o Dedicated counselor for the nursing students
3
o Funds from administration to pay for faculty educational conferences
•
What are your longer term vision(s) and goals for your program? (Educational Master
Plan)
o To keep the nursing program viable within the scope of the community college
o To make the salary for a nursing faculty member comparable to industry
standards.Currently, entry level RNs graduating from our program are making
more money than a new faculty member.
Appendix A: Budget History and Impact
Audience: Budget Committee, PRBC,and Administrators
Purpose: This analysis describes your history of budget requests from the previous two years and
the impacts of funds received and needs that were not met. This history of documented need
can both support your narrative in Section A and provide additional information for Budget
Committee recommendations.
Instructions: Please provide the requested information, and fully explain the impact of the budget
decisions.
Category
Classified Staffing (2 positions)
Supplies & Services (medication
pass instructors -6)
Technology/Equipment
(Computer testing room for 60
students)
TOTAL
2013-14
Budget
Requested
$15,000
$52,000
0
0
$30,000
97,000
2013-14
Budget
Received
2014-15
Budget
Requested
15,000
$52,000
0
0
0
$30,000
0
0
97,000
0
2014-15
Budget
Received
1. How has your investment of the budget monies you did receive improved student learning? When
you requested the funding, you provided a rationale. In this section, assess if the anticipated
positive impacts you projected have, in fact, been realized.
We have yet to receive money from the college and continue to use our grant funds. The grant funds
will run out in June, 2015. The use of the simulation lab helps us meet the hospital standards of 8 out of
10 students in a clinical group. The use of the simulation lab enhances student learning, critical thinking
and improves student abilities to respond in emergency or critical situations and provides safe
competent nursing care on the clinical unit. Although the college did not fund the medication pass
instructors, these were funded through grant monies. The clinical instructors were able to increase
patient safety during bedside care and provided more individualized attention to each student. Because
we are anticipating grant funds depleting, the college should absorb the cost to maintain the level of
safety and care for our clients in the community. In our 2014 accreditation review the Board of
Registered Nursing was adamant in their requirement that the college absorb this cost and not rely on
grant funding.
4
2. What has been the impact of not receiving some of your requested funding? How has student
learning been impacted, or safety compromised, or enrollment or retention negatively impacted?
The nursing program has received grant money to provide the medication pass instructor for 2
additional hours during the clinical rotations to assist the instructors. We have this additional help in 6
out of 8 clinical groups at this time. The medication pass instructor provides direct 1 to 1 instruction for
patient safety. Without the grant funding we will not be able to continue our high level of training to
students to meet Joint Commission (Hospital) and BRN standards. This is an important skill and assists
students when applying for positions after graduation.
Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes Assessment Reporting Schedule
I.
Course-Level Student Learning Outcomes & Assessment Reporting
(CLO-Closing the Loop).
A. Check One of the Following:
XNo CLO-CTL forms were completed during this PR year. No Appendix B2 needs to
be submitted with this Year’s Program Review. Note: All courses must be assessed
once at least once every three years.
Yes, CLO-CTL were completed for one or more courses during the current Year’s
Program Review. Complete Appendix B2 (CLO-CTL Form) for each course assessed
this year and include in this Program Review.
B. Calendar Instructions:
List all courses considered in this program review and indicate which year each course Closing
The Loop form was submitted in Program Review by marking submitted in the correct column.
Course
*List one course per line.
Add more rows as
needed.
NA
This Year’s Program
Review
*CTL forms must be
included with this PR.
Last Year’s Program
Review
2-Years Prior
*Note: These courses
must be assessed in the
next PR year.
Appendix B2: “Closing the Loop” Course-Level Assessment Reflections.
Course
Semester assessment data gathered
Number of sections offered in the semester
Number of sections assessed
Nursing Program Core Courses
NA year 3
5
Percentage of sections assessed
Semester held “Closing the Loop” discussion
Faculty members involved in “Closing the Loop” discussion
Form Instructions:
• Complete a separate Appendix B2 form for each Course-Level assessment reported in this
Program Review. These courses should be listed in Appendix B1: Student Learning Outcomes
Assessment Reporting Schedule.
• Part I: CLO Data Reporting. For each CLO, obtain Class Achievement data in aggregate for all
sections assessed in eLumen.
• Part II: CLO Reflections. Based on student success reported in Part I, reflect on the individual
CLO.
• Part III: Course Reflection. In reviewing all the CLOs and your findings, reflect on the course as
a whole.
PART I: COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES – DATA RESULTS
CONSIDER THE COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOMES INDIVIDUALLY (THE
NUMBER OF CLOS WILL DIFFER BY COURSE)
(CLO) 1: N55
Defined Target
Scores*
(CLO Goal)
Demonstration of fundamental concepts and practices
utilizing the nursing process across the life span.
100%
Application of the nursing process and evidence based practice
in the care of adults experiencing selected conditions requiring
treatment in medical-surgical and psychiatric care settings.
100%
(CLO) 2: N60A
(CLO) 3: N59
100%
(CLO) 4: N60B
100%
(CLO) 5: N60C
100%
Application of the nursing process and evidence based practice
in the nursing care of the childbearing and child rearing
families.
Application and analysis of the nursing process utilizing
evidence based practice for groups of clients in the
medical-surgical and critical care setting.
Actual Scores**
(eLumen data)
Application, synthesis, delegation, critical thinking and
analysis of the nursing process utilizing evidence based
practice for groups of clients in the medical-surgical and
critical care setting.
 If more CLOs are listed for the course, add another row to the table.
* Defined Target Scores:What scores in eLumen from your students would indicate success for this CLO?
(Example: 75% of the class scored either 3 or 4)
**Actual scores: What is the actual percent of students that meet defined target based on the eLumen
data collected in this assessment cycle?
6
PART II: COURSE- LEVEL OUTCOME REFLECTIONS
A. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 1:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Theory must be passed at 73%. In 2014 80% scored at or above 73%. We are satisfied with this rate
as some students leave the program for various personal reasons.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Although we have lost 20% over the past year, we understand some students do not have
the dedication to complete the rigors for the program. Some students discover the
profession of nursing does not meet their personal expectations and conflict with
unexpected life events.
B. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 2:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Excellent at 94%.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
We will continue to utilize the course methodology in teaching this course and enhancing
the student learning. We conduct a content review as required by the Board of Registered
Nursing.
7
C. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 3:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Success rate of 96%.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Continued enhancement of student clinical experiences including open lab time,
simulations and tutoring.
D. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 4:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Success at 84% in 2014.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
This is a very rigorous course. We provided weekly tutoring sessions for our theory
courses. Medication pass instructors were instrumental in assisting our students in
enhancing the clinical experience for our students. Without continued funding more
students will not be prepared to pass this course and continue in the program.
8
E. COURSE-LEVEL OUTCOME (CLO) 5:
1. How do your current scores match with your above target for student success in this course
level outcome?
Success at 98% in 2014.
2. Reflection: Based on the data gathered, and considering your teaching experiences and
your discussions with other faculty, what reflections and insights do you have?
Great outcome.
9
PART III: COURSE REFLECTIONS AND FUTURE PLANS
1. What changes were made to your course based on the previous assessment cycle, the prior
Closing the Loop reflections and other faculty discussions?
No changes.
2. Based on the current assessment and reflections, what course-level and programmatic
strengths have the assessment reflections revealed? What actions has your discipline
determined might be taken as a result of your reflections, discussions, and insights?
Last year 96% of the students who passed this class also passed the NCLEX. Over the past
five years the program has had a first time pass rate of 96% -100%. The California Board of
Registered Nursing requires nursing programs to have a pass rate of 85% for accreditation.
We exceed these standards.
Preceptorships are becoming extremely difficult to arrange. In the future we may need to
increase simulation experiences and as a substitute for preceptorships. This will require an
enlargement of our simulation lab to accommodate the 40-50 students along with a
simulation director. Other possibilities in clinical health care are being explored.
3. What is the nature of the planned actions (please check all that apply)?
 Curricular
 Pedagogical
 Resource based
 Change to CLO or rubric
 Change to assessment methods
 XX Other: Simulation_____________________________________
10
Appendix C: Program Learning Outcomes
Considering your feedback, findings, and/or information that has arisen from the course level
discussions, please reflect on each of your Program Level Outcomes.
Program: Nursing Program
PLO #1:Incorporate the core of knowledge unique to the nursing profession in the delivery of
health care in acute, chronic, or community health settings;
PLO#2: Utilize the nursing process to provide care for clients, families and significant others
with diverse health needs and practices;
PLO #3: Respond to the demands of rapidly changing information technology by incorporating
computer literacy in health care delivery and utilizing the internet for research;
PLO#4: Use critical thinking skills in decisions related to managing care for groups of clients;
PLO#5: Practice within the profession‘s ethical and legal framework;
PLO#6: Respond to the unique health needs of the culturally diverse and aging population.
What questions or investigations arose as a result of these reflections or discussions?
Explain: The nursing program is pleased with the current PLO’s
What program-level strengths have the assessment reflections revealed?
Strengths revealed: At this time the Chabot Nursing program is one of top 10 nursing programs
in California with a 96-100% pass rate on the licensing exam (NCLEX). Fall 2014, we have
received over 480 applications for the 40 spaces available.
What actions has your discipline determined might be taken to enhance the learning of
students completing your program?
Actions planned: Continued use of case manager through counseling, additional tutors,
medication pass instructors and increased hours in the skills lab using adjunct instructors all
paid through grant funds. The grant funds are through June 2015. We are looking to replace
two full time instructors we no longer have in medical surgical to meet Board of Registered
Nursing full time instructor requirements.
11
Appendix D: A Few Questions
Please answer the following questions with "yes" or "no". For any questions answered "no",
please provide an explanation. No explanation is required for "yes" answers :-)
1. Have all of your course outlines been updated within the past five years? YES
2. Have you deactivated all inactive courses? (courses that haven’t been taught in five years or
won’t be taught in three years should be deactivated)YES
3. Have all of your courses been offered within the past five years? If no, why should those
courses remain in our college catalog?NO, we are not offering foreign trained nursing individual
courses due to lack of available full time instructors and clinical placements
2
Do all of your courses have the required number of CLOs completed, with corresponding
rubrics? If no, identify the CLO work you still need to complete, and your timeline for
completing that work this semester. Yes, on our core nursing program courses.
4. Have you assessed all of your courses and completed "closing the loop" forms for all of your
courses within the past three years? If no, identify which courses still require this work, and
your timeline for completing that work this semester.YES
5. Have you developed and assessed PLOs for all of your programs? If no, identify programs which
still require this work, and your timeline to complete that work this semester.YES
6. If you have course sequences, is success in the first course a good predictor of success in the
subsequent course(s)?YES
7. Does successful completion of College-level Math and/or English correlate positively with
success in your courses? If not, explain why you think this may be.YES
12
Appendix E: Proposal for New Initiatives (Complete for each new initiative)
Audience: Deans/Unit Administrators, PRBC, Foundation, Grants Committee, College Budget Committee
Purpose: A “New Initiative” is a new project or expansion of a current project that supports our Strategic Plan. The project will require the support
of additional and/or outside funding. The information you provide will facilitate and focus the research and development process for finding both
internal and external funding.
How does your initiative address the college's Strategic Plan goal, or significantly improve student learning?
The nursing program needs a designated computer lab that will be available for testing (all courses use Blackboard for
exams), electronic charting, and student learning activities (50 computers)
What is your specific goal and measurable outcome?
Enhance and maintain student learning, virtual clinical experiences and achieve student individual educational goals.
Measureable outcomes are to include but are not limited to passing ATI computerized assessments at the end of each
course with a composite score of level 2 or above. NCLEX exam is a computerized test and data suggests that each
student should do at least 6000 computerized practice questions to be successful.
What is your action plan to achieve your goal?
Target
Activity (brief description)
Completion
Date
Rewire room 2256 with a new internet server.
August
2015
Request combining room 2256 and 2254 to a large computer August
room for nursing, dental and medical assisting students. Place 2016
a door between rooms or remove wall. The rooms could then
be used by other depts.
Update 2200 upstairs (4) classrooms to meet smart classroom August
standards.
2016
Update 3100 with smart classroom technology. Add additional August
storage and classrooms.
2017
How will you manage the personnel needs?
13
Required Budget (Split out personnel,
supplies, other categories)
Approximately $50,000 wiring and server
Additional 40 computers =$45,000
Tables = $ 85,000
Construction = $50,000
???$500,000
????$2M
x
New Hires:
xx Faculty # of positions 3 XX Classified staff # of positions 1
Reassigning existing employee(s) to the project; employee(s) current workload will be:
Covered by overload or part-time employee(s)
Covered by hiring temporary replacement(s)
Other, explain
At the end of the project period, the proposed project will:
Be completed (onetime only effort)
xx
Require additional funding to continue and/or institutionalize the project (obtained by/from):
Will the proposed project require facility modifications, additional space, or program relocation?
No
xx explain additional space requiredYes, explain:
Will the proposed project involve subcontractors, collaborative partners, or cooperative agreements?
No
xxYes, explain: building upgrade requires construction contracts
Do you know of any grant funding sources that would meet the needs of the proposed project?
xxNo
Yes, list potential funding sources:
14
Appendix F1: Full-Time Faculty/Adjunct Staffing Request(s) [Acct. Category 1000]
Audience: Faculty Prioritization Committeeand Administrators
Purpose: Providing explanation and justification for new and replacement positions for full-time faculty and adjuncts
Instructions: Please justify the need for your request. Discussanticipated improvements in student learning and contribution to the Strategic
Plangoal. Cite evidence and data to support your request, including enrollment management data (EM Summary by Term) for the most recent
three years, student success and retention data, and any other pertinent information. Data is available at
http://www.chabotcollege.edu/ProgramReview/Data2013.cfm.
1. Number of new faculty requested in this discipline: ___
PLEASE LIST IN RANK
ORDER
STAFFING REQUESTS (1000) FACULTY
Position
Medical Surgical full time tenure
tract faculty
Pediatric Instructor half time
Full time tenure tract faculty
Part-Time Non-Tenure Adjunct
Faculty (6)
Part-Time Non-Tenure Faculty (1)
Description
Faculty (1000)
Program/Unit
Medical-Surgical
Instructor (open)
Pediatric Instructor (preretirement reduction)
Skills Lab
Coordinator/Instructor
(Retirement)
Medication pass
instructor 4 hours
clinical/weekly
Assist in Skills lab check
offs
Division/Area
Nursing
Health/Nursing
Nursing
Health/Nursing
Nursing
Health/Nursing
Nursing
Health/Nursing
Nursing
Health/Nursing
Rationale for your proposal. Please use the enrollment management data. Data that will strengthen your rationale include FTES trends over
the last 5 years,FT/PT faculty ratios,recent retirements in your division, total number of full time and part-time faculty in the division, total
number of students served by your division, FTEF in your division, CLO and PLO assessment results and external accreditation demands.
15
We are short one medical surgical position since the resignation of the MS instructor in Fall 2014 three weeks after the semester began.
Currently we have 6 part-time clinical instructors to help with medication administration in the clinical setting. These six positions are grant
funded and which will end in June 2015. The reason for the medication pass instructor is to allow students to administer more medications,
safely in hospital setting.
The Pediatric instructor currently on load reduction, semi-retirement. . Skills lab coordinator will be retiring in Spring 2015.
2. Statements about the alignment with the strategic plan and your student learning goals are required. Indicate here any information from
advisory committees or outside accreditation reviews that is pertinent to the proposal.
Program must meet BRN requirements to maintain accreditation.
16
Appendix F2: Classified Staffing Request(s) including Student Assistants [Acct. Category 2000]
Audience: Administrators, PRBC
Purpose: Providing explanation and justification for new and replacement positions for full-time and part-time regular (permanent) classified
professional positions(new, augmented and replacement positions).Remember, student assistants are not to replace Classified Professional staff.
Instructions: Please justify the need for your request. Discuss anticipated improvements in student learning and contribution to the Strategic Plan
goal, safety, mandates, and accreditation issues. Please cite any evidence or data to support your request. If this position is categorically funded,
include and designate the funding source of new categorically-funded position where continuation is contingent upon available funding.
1. Number of positions requested: _____
STAFFING REQUESTS (2000) CLASSIFIED PROFESSIONALS
Position
1. Simulation lab technician-8
hours/week
2.Simulation lab helper-8
hours/week
Tutors (4)
Classified Professional Staff (2000)
Description
Program/Unit
Simulation lab technician
Nursing
Simulation lab helper
Nursing
Nursing tutors in skills and
theory
Nursing
17
PLEASE LIST IN RANK
ORDER
Division/Area
Health/Nursing
Health/Nursing
Health/Nursing
2. Rationale for your proposal.
1. This position is necessary to run and maintain the manikins in the simulation lab. It is currently funded with grant monies for only 8
hours per week. This limits the use of the simulation lab.
2. This position would require an RN license and medical knowledge to create and implement nursing simulation scenarios.
3. Statements about the alignment with the strategic plan and program review are required. Indicate here any information from advisory
committees or outside accreditation reviews that is pertinent to the proposal.
Advisory committee members from area hospitals have advised the program that alternative clinical sites will be required in the future to accommodate the
number of nursing students per unit. Simulation lab will be a viable/acceptable alternative as per BRN guidelines.
18
Appendix F3: FTEF Requests
Audience: Administrators, CEMC, PRBC
Purpose: To recommend changes in FTEF allocations for subsequent academic year and guide Deans and
CEMC in the allocation of FTEF to disciplines. For more information, see Article 29 (CEMC) of the Faculty
Contract.
Instructions: In the area below, please list your requested changes in course offerings (and
corresponding request in FTEF) and provide your rationale for these changes. Be sure to analyze
enrollment trends and other relevant data
athttp://www.chabotcollege.edu/ProgramReview/Data2013.cfm.
COURSE
CURRENT
FTEF
(2014-15)
ADDITIONAL
FTEF
NEEDED
CURRENT
SECTIONS
19
ADDITIONAL
SECTIONS
NEEDED
CURRENT
STUDENT #
SERVED
ADDITIONAL
STUDENT #
SERVED
Appendix F4: Academic Learning Support Requests [Acct. Category 2000]
Audience: Administrators, PRBC, Learning Connection
Purpose: Providing explanation and justification for new and replacement student assistants (tutors, learning assistants, lab assistants,
supplemental instruction, etc.).
Instructions: Please justify the need for your request. Discuss anticipated improvements in student learning and contribution to the Strategic Plan
goal. Please cite any evidence or data to support your request. If this position is categorically funded, include and designate the funding source of
new categorically-funded position where continuation is contingent upon available funding.
1. Number of positions requested:
2. If you are requesting more than one position, please rank order the positions.
Position
Description
1. Counseling part-time
Case manager for retention grant
2.
3.
4.
3. Rationale for your proposal based on your program review conclusions. Include anticipated impact on student learning outcomes and
alignment with the strategic plan goal. Indicate if this request is for the same, more, or fewer academic learning support positions.
Due to the high stress nature of the nursing program we need a case manager to support student success. This is the plan to increase retention
and decrease attrition. Currently this is funded with grant monies.
20
Appendix F5: Supplies & Services Requests [Acct. Category 4000 and 5000]
Audience: Administrators, Budget Committee, PRBC
Purpose: To request funding for supplies and service, and to guide the Budget Committee in allocation of funds.
Instructions: In the area below, please list both your current and requested budgets for categories 4000 and 5000 in priority order. Do NOT
include conferences and travel, which are submitted on Appendix M6. Justify your request and explain in detail any requested funds beyond
those you received this year. Please also look for opportunities to reduce spending, as funds are very limited.
Supplies Requests [Acct. Category 4000]
Instructions:
1. There should be a separate line item for supplies needed and an amount.
For items purchased in bulk, list the unit cost and provide the total in the "Amount" column.
2. Make sure you include the cost of tax and shipping for items purchased.
Priority 1: Are criticalrequests required to sustain a program (if not acquired, program may be in peril) or to meet mandated requirements of local,
state or federal regulations or those regulations of an accrediting body for a program.
Priority 2: Are needed requests that will enhance a program but are not so critical as to jeopardize the life of a program if not
received in the requested academic year.
Priority 3: Are requests that are enhancements, non-critical resource requeststhat would be nice to have and would bring additional benefit to the program.
Description
Centralized Clinical
Placement Services
(CCPS)
ATI TEAS V incoming
students
General Office Supplies
Simulation lab/Skills Lab
Supplies
2014-15
Request
$1000.00
Receive
d
0
$3,500
($35/stude
nt X 100)
$3,000.00
0
$5,000
0
0
2015-16
Request
Vendor
Division
Unit
Priority
#1
$1000
CINHC
Health
Nursing
X
$3,500
ATI
$1500
$5,000
Staples
Health
Nursing
Health
Nursing
X
McKesson
Health
Nursing
X
21
Priority
#2
x
Priority
#3
Simulation Lab Manikin
Replacement
na
130,000
Laerdal
Health
Nursing
x
Contracts and Services Requests [Acct. Category 5000]
Instructions:
1. There should be a separate line item for each contract or service.
2. Travel costs should be broken out and then totaled (e.g., airfare, mileage, hotel, etc.)
Priority 1: Are criticalrequests required to sustain a program (if not acquired, program may be in peril) or to meet mandated
requirements of local,
state or federal regulations or those regulations of a accrediting body for a program.
Priority 2: Are needed requests that w ill enhance a program but are not so critical as to jeopardize the life of a program if not received in
the requested academic year.
Priority 3: Are requests that are enhancem ents, non-critical resource requests that would be nice to have and would bring additional
benefit to the program.
augm entations only
Description
Amount
Vendor
Division/Unit
Manikin warranty
3,000
Laerdal
Health Nursing
22
Priority #1
x
Priority
#2
Priority #3
Appendix F6: Conference and Travel Requests [ Acct. Category 5000]
Audience: Staff Development Committee,Administrators, Budget Committee, PRBC
Purpose: To request funding for conference attendance, and to guide the Budget and Staff Development Committees in allocation of funds.
Instructions:Please list specific conferences/training programs, including specific information on the name of the conference and location. Note
that the Staff Development Committee currently has no budget, so this data is primarily intended to identify areas of need that could perhaps be
fulfilled on campus, and to establish a historical record of need. Your rationale should discuss student learning goals and/or connection to the
Strategic Plan goal.
Description
COADN Director/Faculty
Conference (5)
Directors conferences (2)
Travel Preceptorships/clinical
site review
Continuing Education for
Nursing Faculty
Amount
$500 per
faculty X 5 =
$2,500
$2000
Priority Priority Priority
Division/Dept
#1
#2
#3
Vendor
Associate Degree
Directors in CA
Health
Nursing
Associate Degree
Directors in CA
Health
Nursing
$500
NA
Health
Nursing
2000
Various
Health
Nursing
23
Notes
x
Faculty have been
attending for the past 10
years
x
Mandatory for all
directors of nursing
programs.
x
X
Appendix F7: Technology and Other Equipment Requests [Acct. Category 6000]
Audience: Budget Committee, Technology Committee, Administrators
Purpose: To be read and responded to by Budget Committee and to inform priorities of the Technology Committee.
Instructions: Please fill in the following as needed to justify your requests.If you're requesting classroom technology, see
http://www.chabotcollege.edu/audiovisual/Chabot%20College%20Standard.pdf for the brands/model numbers that are our current standards.
If requesting multiple pieces of equipment, please rank order those requests. Include shipping cost and taxes in your request.
Instructions:
1. For each piece of equipment, there should be a separate line item for each piece and
an amount. Please note: Equipment requests are for equipment whose unit cost exceeds $200.
Items which are less expensive should be requested as supplies. Software licenses should also be
requested as supplies.
2.
For bulk items, list the unit cost and provide the total in the "Amount" column.
Make sure you include the cost of tax and shipping for items purchased.
Priority 1: Are criticalrequests required to sustain a program (if not acquired, program may be
in peril) or to meet mandated requirements of local,
state or federal regulations or those regulations of a accrediting body for a program.
Priority 2: Are needed requests that w ill enhance a program but are not so critical as to
jeopardize the life of a program if not received in the requested academic year.
Priority 3: Are requests that are enhancem ents, non-critical resource requests that would be
nice to have and would bring additional benefit to the program.
Description
Amount
Vendor
Division/Unit
Computers (40) and workstations room
2254
Internet server replaced room 2254
$45,000.00 HP
Health Nursing
$50,000
Health Nursing
Priority
#1
x
24
x
Priority #2
Priority #3
Appendix F8: Facilities Requests
Audience: Facilities Committee, Administrators
Purpose: To be read and responded to by Facilities Committee.
Background: Following the completion of the 2012 Chabot College Facility Master Plan, the Facilities Committee (FC) has begun the task of reprioritizing Measure B Bond budgets to better align with current needs. The FC has identified approximately $18M in budgets to be used to meet
capital improvement needs on the Chabot College campus. Discussion in the FC includes holding some funds for a year or two to be used as match
if and when the State again funds capital projects, and to fund smaller projects that will directly assist our strategic goal. The FC has determined
that although some of the college's greatest needs involving new facilities cannot be met with this limited amount of funding, there are many
smaller pressing needs that could be addressed. The kinds of projects that can be legally funded with bond dollars include the "repairing,
constructing, acquiring, and equipping of classrooms, labs, sites and facilities." Do NOT use this form for equipment or supply requests.
Instructions: Please fill in the following as needed to justify your requests.If requesting more than one facilities project, please rank order your
requests.
Brief Title of Request (Project Name): Remodel 2256 and 2254 2nd floor building 2200
Building/Location: Building 2200
Description of the facility project. Please be as specific as possible.
Revision of room 2256 and 2254 into a computer lab that will accommodate 65 students.
Also update the nursing workroom with new cabinets and counter tops
What educational programs or institutional purposes does this equipment support?
Revision of room 2256 and 2254 into a computer lab that will accommodate 65 students.
Also update the nursing workroom with new cabinets and counter tops
Briefly describe how your request relates specifically to meeting the Strategic Plan Goal and to enhancing student learning?
Increase the number of students that will achieve their educational goal within a reasonable time.
Please see the roadmap for our students to transfer to CSUEB.
25