FAMILY HOUSING
1
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 12. DATE
Il. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
COMMAND:
5. AREA CONST
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
COST INDEX
WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE,
1.01
SUPPORTED
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
I
OFF 1 ENL
I CIV OFF1 ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF 1
ENL 1
CIV
TOTAL
Grength
AS OF 30 SEP 02
3580 375
422
0
1
0
13
45
67
4,503
END FY 2007
422
3580 375
0
1
0
13
45
67
4,503
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
5,214
Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
1,372,989
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
a
18,221
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
38,951
IPlanned in Next Three Years Program:
39,007
Remaining Deficiency:
cl
Grand Total:
1,469.168
I
I
Yl”“lII
#“I
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
CODE
711-142
PROJECT TITLE
Replace Family Housing
(FY 2004)
SCOPE
100 UN
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
711-142
711-142
Replace Family Housing
Replace Family Housing
(FY2005)
104 UN
113 UN
Replace Family Housing
Replace Family Housing
18,926
20,025
(FYO6-09)
9b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
711-142
711-142
COST DESIGN STATUS
$,OOO S T A R T C M P L
18,221 Jul-02
May-03
76 UN
128 UN
14,579
24,428
102,649
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
10. Mission or Major Functions: A bomber wing with two squadrons of B-2 aircraft; and an Air Force
Reserve fighter wing with one A/OA-10 squadron.
DD Form 1390.24 Jul 00
1
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE, MISSOURI
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
WITH LAND ACQUISITION PHASE 5
6. CATEGORY CODE
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
7. PROJECT NUMBER
YWHG029300
711-142
88741
6. PROJECT COST ($000)
18,221
.
9. COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
UTILITY MAINS
STREETS
LANDSCAPING
RECREATION
LAND ACQUISITION
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
TOTAL REQUEST
U/M
QUANTITY
UNIT COST
UN
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
100
117,280
COST
ww
11.728
4.689
(875)
(1,120)
(1,015)
(439)
(790)
(75)
(375)
16,417
&l
17,238
p3J
18,221
1.01
AREA COST FACTOR
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: Design and construct 100 JNCO single or duplex family
housing units with all necessary support. Includes: land acquisition. site development, utilities, roads, parking,
sidewalks, street lighting, garages, storage, force protection, patios. privacy fencing, air conditioning, appliances,
recreation facility and play areas, tot lots, landscaping. partial basements. and all other necessary support.
Payqrade Bedroom
El-E6
3
4
El-E6
Programmed
NSF
GSF
1,315
1,630
1,573
1,950
Maximum size: El-E6/3 Bedroom (1420 NSF/1760 GSF)
Maximum SIX: E I-E6I-l Bedroom (1790 NSF/2220 GSF)
11. REQUIREMENT: 2,013 UN
Project
Factor
1.010
1.010
GSM
151
181
Cost Per
GSM
$754
$754
No
Units
90
22
100
($000)
j&If
10,349
1.379
11,728
’
ADEQUATE: 1,298 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 693 UN
PROJECT: Replace Military Family Housing (Phase 5) and acquire necessary land to meet “whole-house” and new
housing SIX 3randards. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMfiNT: This project is required to provide modern. effictcnt housin,cv for military members and their
Families sturloncd ;11 WhIteman AFB. All units will meet “\vhole-house” standards and are programmed in accordance
with the Hou>~n~ C‘ommunlty Plan. This housing \\ ill pro\ I& ;I ufc. comfortable and appealing living environment
:omp;lrablc 10 the off-base clvilian community. Land acquislrlon \\ill be 25 acres 10 accommodate the increased
lousin; size \landarrlh.
MH 1 DE “3C” II-4 I C”lVHLL T
PAGE NO
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
361
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE, MISSOURI
5. PROJECT NUMBER
4. PROJECT TITLE
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING WITH LAND ACQUISITION
I
YWHG029300
CURRENT SITUATION: The rural community surrounding Whiteman AFB does not have sufficient, adequate
housing assets to support existing requirements. The latest Housin_r Market Analysis indicates a deficit of 129 housing
units. The deficit is significant for JNCO grades. These are the families that can least afford to live off-base. Off-base
housing is very difficult to find and expensive. No land is available within current base boundaries to support
construction of the larger sized replacement homes.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Air Force members and their families will be housed in unsatisfactory facilities, which
will contribute to lowered morale. Housing inventory will continue to deteriorate without capital improvements.
Without this project, the repair of these units will occur in a more costly. piecemeal fashion with little overall
improvement to the quality of living.
ADDITIONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part II of Military Handbook 1190, “Facility
Planning and Design Guide”. An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of construction,
leasing, and status quo operation. Based on the net present values and benefits of the respective alternatives,
construction was found to be the most effective over the life of the project. The SIOH is 5.7% since the Army Corp of
Engineers will be the construction agent. Base Civil Engineer. Major Richard Sloop, at DSN 97.53503.
DD FORM 1391 c, DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
362
L. UHlt
1. LUMt’UNtN I
AIR FORCE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
1 WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE. MISSOURI
5. PROJECT NUMBER
t 4. PROJECT TITLE
~REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING WITII LXND ACQUISITION
~PHASE 5
~12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
YWHG029300
(1) Status:
( a ), Date Design Started
( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs
( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002
( d ) Date 35% Designed
( e ) Date Design Complete
( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed;
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where design was most recently used -
Design/Bid/Build
02 Jul31
N
35
02 Dee 15
03 May 15
NO
N/A
(3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ):
( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications
( b ) All other Design Costs
( c ) Total
( d ) Contract
( e ) In-house
($835)
835
0
835
835
(4) Construction Start
04 Apr
(5) Construction Completion
05 Jun
b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A
DD FORM 1391c. DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
363
12.
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
3. DOD COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
5. DATA AS OF
1 1. DATE OF REPORT
act-01
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
a. NAME
WHITEMAN AIR FORCE BASE
FISCAL
YE A R
2004
IREPORT CONTROL
IDD-ABL(ARj1716
SYMBOL
b. LOCATION
Phase 5
MISSOURI
5. REMARKS
Item lZ.a.(l):
693 on-base units are inadequate.
364
3
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
I. COMPONENT
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
NSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND:
5. AREA CONST
vlALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE,
AIR FORCE SPACE
COST INDEX
vlONTANA
COMMAND
1.15
5. Personnel
STUDENTS
JT
SUPPORTED
1 CIV
OFF1 E N L 1 CIV
Strength
OFF 1
ENL 1
CIV
TQTAL
31 432
01
01
9s OF 30 SEP 02
0
01
01
0
3,996
:ND FY 2007
3 0 5 2 ) 4311
01
5111
01
01
01
01
3,99d
01
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
rotal Acreage:
3,701
nventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
1,247,51:
juthorization Not Yet in Inventory:
4,71:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
19,361
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
I
(FY 2005)
‘Ianned in Next Three Years Program:
36,38’
qemaining Deficiency:
(
brand Total:
1,307,971
3. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
>ATEGORY
PROJECT TITLE
ZODE
‘11-142
Replace Family Housing
(FY 2004)
SCOPE
94 UN
)a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program: None
COST DESIGN STATUS
$,OOO S T A R T C M P L
19,368 Sep-02
Jun-0:
(FY 2005)
none
*
lb. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
‘11-142
Replace Family Housing
‘11-142
Replace Family Housing
(FYO6-09)
70 UN
72 UN
17,848
18,533
76,54(
fc. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
0. Mission or Major Functions: AFSPC strategic missile base supporting the 341 st Space Wing and an
\NG/ACC Red Horse Squadron.
ID Form 1390,24 Jul 00
365
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2 DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
4. PROJECT TITLE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE, MONTANA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
7. PROJECT NUMBER
71 I-142
88741
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
NZAS994006N
19.368
9. COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENT
UTILITY MAINS
STREETS
LANDSCAPING
RECREATION
ENVIRONMENTAL
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
TOTAL REQUEST
U/M
QUANTIl-Y
UNIT COST
UN
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
94
172,649
COST
6ow)
16,229
1,222
(380)
wo
(182)
(180)
fl801
(100)
17,451
873
18,324
1,044
19,368
1.15
AREA COST FACTOR
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: Replace 93 existing military family housing units. Includes
construction, site preparation, utilities, streets. landscapin g. recreation. and environmental remediation (lead-based paint
and asbestos removal).
Programmed
Project
Cost Per
No
($000)
GSM
Factor
Units
Total
Pavqrade Bedroom
pl!3J
GSF
GSM
1,712
159
1.196
$754
36
5,162
2
1,381
El-E6
1.196
18
3,019
1,615
2,002
186
$754
El-E6
3
4
. 216
1.196
$754
779
4
1,873
2,322
El-E6
24
207
1.196
$754
4,480
3
1,800
2,232
01-03
4
$754
848
2,522
235
4
1.196
01-03
2,034
1.941
4
1.196
$754
269
2,332
2,892
06
s
94
16,229
Maximum size: El-E6/2 Bedroom (1210 NSF/1500 GSF). 3 Bedroom (1420 NSF11760 GSF). 4 Bedroom (1790 NSF/
2220 GSF); Ol-03/3 Bedroom (1650 NSF12050 GSF). 3 Bedroom (2020 NSF/2500 GSF); O-614 Bedroom (2350 NSF/
2920 GSF)
11. REQUIREMENT: 1,963 UN
ADEQUATE: 397 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 1,009 UN
PROJECT: Replace 94 family housing units. (Current Minion)
REQUIREMENT: Project will provide modern and efficient housing for military members and their families assigned
lt Maimstrom AFB. All units are required to meet “whole hou~e/neifhborhood” standards, current AF housing size
;tandards. and provide a safe. comfortable. and appealin,~1 Irvin?c environment comparable to the off-base civilian
Iommunity. Infrastructure items will be replaced. ah needed; 1.e. electrical wiring, gas piping. water piping and sanitary
Jrain lines.
-\n trl3PM ,203 nl=:r 7c
Dc2lz\,lnl I< ~:nlTlnhl~ A.,A” l2c I ICFrl INTI=C)klAI I ”
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE. hlONTANA
4. PROJECT TITLE
5. PROJECT NUMBER
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
NZAS994006N
CURRENT SITUATION: This project replaces 9-l military family housing units constructed in 1965. These units are
over 39 years old and none of the units meet current AF housing size standards or “whole house/neighborhood”
standards. The units show the effects of age and continuous heavy use. The houses have deteriorated to the point
where replacement is the most economical alternative. Wiring and fixtures have been identified as not meeting current
codes. Wiring is brittle and exposed in many units and IS a fire hazard. There are no Ground Fault Circuit Interrupter
protection, and outlets lack proper grounding protection. Lighting systems are inefficient and require replacement.
Plumbing systems have succumbed to the effects of hard water and corrosion, resulting in severe constriction and pipe
leakage. Plumbing fixtures are worn and discolored and require replacing with new items. Housing interiors are
inadequate. Bedrooms are outdated and units are energy-Inefficient. Kitchens lack sufficient storage and counterspace,
cabinets are old, and countertops and sinks are badly worn. Flooring throughout the units is outdated. Housing also
lacks the arctic area that is authorized for northern tier installations.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Air Force members and their families will continue to be housed in inadequate housing
units. Low morale and retention problems can be expected since suitable. affordable off-base housing is not readily
available. Without the replacement, housing units will continue to deteriorate resulting in escalating operations,
maintenance, and repair costs to the Government.
ADDITIONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part II of Military Handbook 1190, “Facilities
Planning and Design Guide.” An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of replacement
construction. improvement. and status quo. Based on the net present values and benefit of this respective alternative,
replacement construction was found to be most COSI effective over the life of the project. Since this is replacement
ilousing. there will be no increase in the student population or impact on the ability of the local school district to
support base dependents. The improvement cost represents more than 70% of the replacement cost. U.S. Army Corps
If Engineers will be the construction agent. Resulting the SIOH of 5.7%. Base Civil Engineer: PHILIP E.
RAINFORTH, Lt Col. USAF (commercial 406-73 I-6188).
ID FORM 1391c, DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
tiNTlL EXHAUSTED
367
1. COMPONENT
.4IR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE. MONTANA
4. PROJECT TITLE
5. PROJECT NUMBER
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
NZAS993006N
( 1) status:
( a ) Date Design Started
( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs
( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002
( d ) Date 35% Designed
( e ) Date Design Complete
( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed;
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where design was most recently used (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or (d ) + ( e ):
( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications
( b ) All other Design Costs
( c ) Total
( d ) Contract
( e ) In-house
Design/Bid/Build
02 Sep 06
N
35
02 Dee 30
03 Jun 30
NO
N/A
W390)
890
0
890
890
(-I) Construction Start
04 May
(5) Construction Completion
05 Sep
1. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A
DD FORM 1391 c, DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
3643
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
1 1. DATE OF REPORT
Ott-02
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
a. NAME
3. DOD COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
I 2.
!
YEAR
SYMBOL
b. LOCATION
MONTANA
CURRENT
ANALYSIS
IREPORT CONTROL
IDD-ABL(AR)1716
2004
Phase 4
MALMSTROM AIR FORCE BASE
5. DATA AS OF
2002
FlscAL
PROJECTED
c. UNACCEPTABLE HOUSED IN COMMUNITY
0
0
0
0
3
1
65
69
3
1
59
63
347
200
1.474
2.021
345
196
1,422
1.963
311
200
1.416
1.927
309
196
1.364
1,669
222
136
954
1,312
222
136
954
1.312
36
0
56
94
36
0
59
94
IO. VOLUNTARY SEPARATIONS
I
I
I
Il. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS (a + b)
a. UNDER MILITARY CONTROL
(1) HOUSED IN EXISTING DOD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED
(3) VACANT
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATE HOUSING
(1) ACCEPTABLY HOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLE VACANT RENTAL
4. PROPOSED PROJECT
5. REMARKS
Item 12.a.(l):
1,009 On-base units are inadequate.
369
I
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND:
5. AREA CONST
SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE,
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
COST INDEX
0.82
NORTH CAROLINA
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF 1 ENL
1 CIV OFF\ ENL 1 CIV
OFF 1
ENL 1
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 02
5321
43441 385
51
11
0
01
01
170
END FY 2007
5321
43441 3851
5)
11
01
01
01
1701
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
4,107
Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
B. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
CODE
711-142
PROJECT TITLE
Replace Family Housing
Replace Family Housing
Replace Family Housing
SCOPE
138 UN
Replace Family Housing
Replace Family Housing
904,31
COST DESIGN STATUI
$,OOO S T A R T C M P L
18,336 Jul-02
May-O:
(FY2005)
150 UN
150 UN
ab. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
711-142
71 l-142
791,71
lo,60
18,33
4184
41,821
(FY 2004)
3a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
711-142
711-142
TOTA
5.4:
5,43
20,331
21,511
(FYO6-09)
150 UN
150 UN
20,716
21,110
)c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
116,13’
IO. Mission or Major Functions: A fighter wing with 4 F-l 5E squadrons, including 2 which conduct all initial
qualification training, and an Air Force Reserve KC-135 air refueling wing.
COMPONENl
AIR FORCE
1 2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
1 4. PROJECTTITLE
SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE. NORTII
CAROLINA
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
( 6. CATEGORY CODE
1 7. PROJECTNUMBER
\
71 l-132
88741
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING PHASE 7
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
4G036002
.
18.336
9. COST E TIMAl
ITEM
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
UTILITY MAINS
STREETS
LANDSCAPING
RECREATION
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (5.5%)
TOTAL REQUEST
U/M
OUANTITY
UNIT COST
UN
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
13s
85.862
COST
($OW
11.849
4,703
(1,493)
( 1,020)
(645)
(190)
cmo)
(1,155)
16.552
828
17,380
956
18,336
o.s:!
AREA COST FACTOR
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: Replace S housing units. Includes den ition, site
clearing, replacement/upgrade of utility systems and roads. and construction of new town house and duplex housing
units. Provides normal amenities to include parkin g. air conditioning. single garages, exterior patios and privacy
Fencing. neighborhood playgrounds and recreational areas. and landscaping. Includes asbestos and lead based paint
-emoval.
Pavqrade Bedroom
El-E6
2
El-E6
3
Programmed
pl!sJ
GSF
1,081
1,340
1,315
1,630
GSM
124
151
Project
Factor
0.820
0.820
Cost Per
GSM
$754
$754
No
Units
62
E
138
($000)
m
4,764
7.095
11,849
Maximum size: El-E6/2 Bedroom (1210 NSF/I500 GSF)
Maximum size: E I-E6/3 Bedroom ( 1420 NSF/l 760 GSF)
Il. REQUIREMENT: 2,532 UN
ADEQUATE: 1,400 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 1 ,132 UN
(1 Phase 7. (Current Mission)
‘ROJECT: Replace Military Family Housin,.
IEQUIREhlENT: This project is required to provide modern and efficient housing for military members and their
iependents stationed at Seymour Johnson AFB. All units \vill meet “whole house” standards and are programmed in
accordance with the Housing Community Profile. Replacement housing will provide a safe, comfortable, and
appealing living environment comparable to the off-base civilian community. This is the seventh of multiple phases to
jrovide adequate housing for base personnel. The replacement housing will provide a modern kitchen. living room.
jedroom and bath configuration. with ample interior and exterior storage and a single car garage. Exterior parking will
re provided for :I second occupant vehicle and guests. The basic neighborhood support infrastructure will be upgraded
I) meet modern housina needs.
)D FORM 1391, DEC 76
F‘AGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
371
2. UAlt
1. LUMVUNtN I
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE. NORTlI CAROLINA
4. PROJECT TITLE
5. PROJECT NUMBER
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING PHASE 7
VKAG036002
CURRENT SITUATION: This project replaces 13s housin g units. which were constructed in 1958. These 44 year-old
houses are showing the effects of age and continuous heavy use. They have had no major upgrades since construction
and do not meet the needs of today’s families. nor do thev provide a modern home environment. Roofs and exterior
walls require major repair or replacement owing to the effects of age and the environment. Ceiling and wall insulation
are inadequate. Foundations and pavements are showing signs of failure due to settlement. Plumbing and electrical
systems are antiquated and do not meet current standards for efficiency or safety. Housing interiors are inadequate by
any modem criteria. Bedrooms are small and lack adequate closet space. Bathrooms are small and fixtures are
outdated. Kitchens have insufficient cabinets. countertops. and storage space. Cabinets are old and unsightly. and
countertops and sinks are worn. Flooring throughout the house is outdated. and contains evidence of asbestos.
Plumbing and electrical systems are outdated and require abnormal maintenance and repair. Lighting systems
throughout the house are inefficient and do not meet modern needs. Heating and air conditioning systems require
upgrade or replacement.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Air Force members and their families will continue to live in extremely outdated and
unsatisfactory housing. The housing units will continue to deteriorate with age, resulting in increased maintenance and
repair costs, increased inconvenience to the occupants. and will ultimately become uninhabitable. Piecemeal repairs
will continue to be accomplished with little or no substantial improvement in occupant’s quality of life. These
conditions will have an adverse impact on morale and degrade mission execution.
ADDITIONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part II of the Military Handbook 1190, “Facility
Planning and Design Guide”. An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of new construction,
improvements. and status quo operation. Based on the net present values and benefits of the respective alternatives,
replacement construction was found to be the most cost effective over the life of the project. Since this is replacement
housing. there will be no increase in the student population or impact on the ability of the local school district to
support base dependents. The cost to improve this housing is 74% of the replacement cost. Base Civil Engineer: Lt
Co1 Kevin E. Rumsey. DSN 722-5 142.
.
DD FORM 1391 c, DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
372
2. DATE
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE. NORTlI CAROLIN.-\
4. PROJECT TITLE
5. PROJECT NUMBER
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING PHASE 7
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
( a ) Date Design Started
( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs
( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002
( d ) Date 35% Designed
( e ) Date Design Complete
( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed:
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where design was most recently used (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ):
( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications
( b ) All other Design Costs
( c ) Total
( d ) Contract
( e ) In-house
(4) Construction Start
VKAG036002
Design/Bid/Build
02 Jul 15
N
35
02 Dee 07
03 May 15
NO
N/A
($840)
840
0
840
840
04 Mar
(5) Construction Completion
05 Jul
3. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A
)D FORM 1391c, DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
373
1. DATE OF REPORT
Ott-00
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
a. NAME
SEYMOUR JOHNSON AIR FORCE BASE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
3. DOD COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
5. DATA AS OF
Jul-00
I
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
2. FISCAL YEAR
2004
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
DD-ABL(AR)1716
b. LOCATION
Phase 7
NORTH CAROLINA
I
CURRENT
OFFICER
E9-E7
1
lb)
(a)
5
7. PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL
5
6
374
j
TOTAL
‘I?
(d)
3.644
4,574
PROJECTED
OFFICER
E9-E7
(e)
(f)
547
368
E6-El
(9)
TOTAL
(h)
3,582
4,497
I
5. REMARKS
Item 12.a.(l):
1132 on-base units are inadequate.
374
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
COMMAND:
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
5. AREA CONST
AIR MOBILITY COMMAND
COST INDEX
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE
1 .Ol
NORTH DAKOTA
STUDENTS
PERMANENT
SUPPORTED
6. Personnel
I
I
1 CIV 1 OFF1 ENL 1 CIV 1 OFF 1
ENL 1
CIV
TOTAL
OFF ENL
Strength
AS OF 30 SEP 02
319
2405
326
0
0
0
1
1
END FY 2007
319
2405 324
0
0
0
1
1
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
5,422
Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
1,316,163
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
55,461
Authorization Requested in this Program:
29,550
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
18,966
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
59,828
Remaining Deficiency:
0
Grand Total:
1,479,968
r
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
PROJECT TITLE
CODE
711-142
Replace Family Housing
I
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
711-142
Replace Family Housing
Typical Planned Next Three Years:
Replace Family Housing
Replace Family Housing
(FY2004)
SCOPE
144 UN
COST DESIGN STATUS
$,OOO S T A R T C M P L
29,550 Jul-02
May-03
(FY 2005)
88 UN
18,966
(FYO6-09)
180 UN
90 UN
40,135
19,693
9c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This lnstallatron
10. Mission and Major Functions: An air refueling wing with four KC-l 35 squadrons.
I
I
110,433
1
DD Form 1390,24 Jul 00
375
r 1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE. NORTlI DAKOT.-\
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING PHASE G
7. PROJECT NUMBER
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
JFSD990079
711-132
29.550
9 COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
UTILITY MAINS
STREETS
SPECIAL FOUNDATIONS
RECREATION
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (5.7’;;)
TOTAL REQUEST
U/M
QUANTITY
UNIT COST
UN
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
144
155,95 1
COST
ww
22,457
4,168
(558)
(668)
(572)
(900)
(670)
(800)
26,625
1.331
27,956
1.594
29,550
AREA COST FACTOR
1.01
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: Replace 141 housing units. Site improvements include
underground utilities. parkin e, landscaping, patios, privacy fencin,,
v and community improvements. Amenities include
Energy efficiency. heating. air conditioning, floor coverings. attached garages, storage, and at least 6 units constructed
as handicapped adaptable. Includes demolition of 14-l existing units and environmental hazard remediation.
Pavqrade Bedroom
El-E6
3
4
El-E6
E7-E9
3
4
E7-E9
Programmed
pJsJ
GSF
1,615
2,002
1,873
2,322
1,800
2,232
2,034
2,522
GSM
186
216
207
235
Project
Factor
1.010
1.010
1.010
1.010
Cost Per
GSM
$754
$754
$754
$754
No
Units
64
58
4
18
144
($000)
w
9,066
9,540
630
3.221
22,457
Maximum size: E I -E6/3 Bedroom ( 1720 NSF/3 133 GSF)
Maximum size: El-EO/J Bedroom (2090 NSF/2592 GSF)
Maximum size: E7-E9/3 Bedroom (1950 NSF/24 18 GSF)
Maximum size: E7-E9/4 Bedroom (2320 NSF/2877 GSF)
11. REQUIREMENT: 1,585 UN
ADEQUATE: 788 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 797 UN
?ROJECT: Replace Military Family Housing Phase G (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT: Prqject will provide modern and efficient housing for military members and their families assigned
it Grand Forks AFB. All units will meet “whole house/ neighborhood” standards and provide a safe, comfortable. and
lppealinf living environment comparable to the off-base civilian community. Pro.iect is programmed in accordance
Nith the HousIng Community Plan and Family Housing Master Plan. At least 6 units will be constructed as
landicapped adaptable. Each unit includes additional 300 net square feet (NSF) authorized for recreation space at
larsh climate baseh.
L
D
PAGE NO
I.
b"NIl-"NtlY
I
AIR FORCE
ii. IJAlt
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE. NORTH DAKOTA
4. PROJECT TITLE
5. PROJECT NUMBER
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING PHASE G
I
JFSD990079
’
CURRENT SITUATION: This project replaces houses constructed 19581959. The units are undersized, meet few of
the “whole house/neighborhood” standards. and show the effects of age and continuous heavy use. They have had no
major upgrades since construction and do not meet the needs of today‘s families. Roofs. walls, foundations. and
exterior pavements require major repair or replacement owing to the effects of age. Roof structures show signs of rot.
Plumbing and electrical systems are antiquated and do not meet current standards for efficiency or safety. Housing
interiors are inadequate by any modern criteria. Bedrooms are small and lack closet space. Bathrooms are small, and
fixtures are outdated and energy-inefficient. Kitchens lack sufficient storage and counter space, cabinets are old and
unsightly, and countertops and sinks are badly worn. Flooring throughout the house is outdated and contains asbestos.
Outlets lack grounding protection, and there is no Ground Fault Interrupter circuit protection. Lighting systems are
inefficient and require replacement, and units have no air conditioning. The units have no patio or backyard privacy.
Housing lacks additional 300 net square feet for indoor recreation space authorized at harsh climate bases.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Air Force members and families will continue to be inadequately housed. Low morale
and retention problems can be expected since comparable. affordable off-base housing is not available. Units will
continue to deteriorate resulting in escalating operations, maintenance, and repair costs to the Government.
ADDITIONAL.: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part II of Military Handbook 1190, “Facilities
Planning and Design Guide”. Since this is replacement housin,.
(1 there will be no increase in the student population or
impact on the ability of the local school district to support base dependents. An economic analysis has been prepared
comparing the alternatives of new construction. revitalization. leasing and status quo operation. Based on the net
present values and benefits of the respective alternatives. new construction was found to be the most cost efficient over
the life of the project. The cost to improve this housing is 85% of the replacement cost. ,The construction agent for this
project is the Army Corps of Engineers resulting in SIOH costs of 5.7%. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Col Douglas Tarbett,
(701) 7374768.
DD FORM 1391 c, DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1. COMPONENr
Z.lJAlt
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE. NORTH D.AKOTA
5. PROJECT NUMBER
4. PROJECT TITLE
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING PHASE G
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
JFSD990079
(1) Status:
( a ) Date Design Started
( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs
( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002
( d ) Date 35% Designed
( e ) Date Design Complete
( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed;
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where design was most recently used -
Design/Bid/Build
02 Jul31
N
35
02 Dee 15
03 May 30
NO
N/A
(3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ):
( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications
( b ) All other Design Costs
( c ) Total
( d ) Contract
( e ) In-house
($1,350)
1.350
0
1,350
1,350
(4) Construction Start
04 May
(5) Construction Completion
05 Aug
b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A
.
DD FORM 1391c, DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
378
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
3. DOD COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
5. DATA AS OF
Jul-01
1. DATE OF REPORT
Dee-01
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
a. NAME
GRAND FORKS AIR FORCE BASE
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
2. FISCAL YEAR
2004
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
DD-ABL(AR)1716
b. LOCATION
Phase G
CURRENT
OFFICER
E9-E7
(a)
(b)
NORTH DAKOTA
E6-El
(cl
TOTAL
(d)
PROJECTED
OFFICER
E9-E7
(d
(0
E6-El
(9)
TOTAL
W
312
245
2.152
2,709
307
236
2,093
2,636
312
245
2.152
2.709
307
236
2,093
2,636
185
218
1,241
1.644
0
22
122
144
0
0
0
0
0
22
122
144
n
n
n
n
7. PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL
6. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
9. TOTAL UNACCEPTABLY HOUSED (a + b + c)
a. INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED
b. IN MILITARY HOUSING TO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
c. UNACCEPTABLE HOUSED IN COMMUNITY
Il. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS (a + b)
a. UNDER MILITARY CONTROL
(1) HOUSED IN EXISTING DOD
Item 12.a.(l):
797 on-base units are inadequate.
289 surplus units (241 Officer, 48 SNCO) will be demolished when useful life ends.
379
AIR FORCE
COMMAND:
5. AREA CONST
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
COST INDEX
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE,
NORTH DAKOTA
1.10
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
6. Personnel
TOTAL
ENL
ENL
CIV OFF ENL
CIV
OFF
CIV
Strength
OFF
AS OF 30 SEP 02
596
4112 498
0
0
0
0
1
54
5,26’
END FY 2007
596
4113 498
0
0
0
0
1
54
5,26:
7: INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
5,383
1,202,67:
Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
18,00(
Authorization Requested in this Program:
41,11;
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
40,66(
215,22(
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
(
1,517,68f
Grand Total:
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
CODE
711-142
PROJECT TITLE
Replace Family Housing
(FY 2004)
SCOPE
200 UN
COST DESl,GN STATUS
$.OOO S T A R T C M P L
41 ,117 Jul-02
May-O:
9a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
(FY2005)
711-142
Replace Family Housing
(FYO6-09)
3b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
71 l-142
711-142
711-142
711-142
711-142
Replace
Replace
Replace
Replace
Replace
Family
Family
Family
Family
Family
Housing
Housing
Housing
Housing
Housing
40,668
170 UN
198
186
178
190
178
UN
UN
UN
UN
UN
41,440
42,227
43,030
43,848
44,681
332,258
3c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
IO. Mission or Major Functions: A host bomb wing with B-52H aircraft, and an AF Space Command space
Ning with Mrnuteman III missiles.
ID Form 1390. 24 Jul 00
380
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
-I PROJECT TITLE
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE. NORTH DAKOTA
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
PHASE 10
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
7 PROJECT NUMBER
QJ L’F0.4900 1
71 I-142
88731
8. PROJECT COST.(SOOO)
41.117
9. COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
UTILITY MAINS
STREETS
LANDSCAPING
RECREATION
SEPCIAL CONSTRUCTION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%-)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (5.75 )
TOTAL REQUEST
U/M
QUANTITY
UNIT COST
UN
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
200
149.255
COST
ww
29.85 1
7,197
(1,800)
(1,707)
(295)
(995)
(2,400)
37,048
1.852
38,900
2.217
41,117
AREA COST FACTOR
1.10
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: Rephi.CL’ NO housing units with all necessary supporting
facilities including: garages, patios, fencin g, utiltties. air conditiomnf. appliances. exterior storage, roads, parking,
sidewalks. playground. landscapin,,0 and all other necessary support facilities. Units will be new construction to replace
units removed by the Walking Shield program.
Pavorade Bedroom
El-E6
3
4
El-E6
Programmed
p&J
GSF
1.615
2,002
1,873
2,322
GSM
186
216
ProJect
Factor
Cost Per
GSM
$754
$754
1.023
1.023
No
Units
150
32
200
($000)
m
21,521
8.330
29,851
Maximum size: E 1 -Eb/i Bedroom (1720 NSF/2 I33 GSF)
Maximum size: E 1 -Eb/-t Bedroom (2090 NSF/3592 GSF)
11. REQUIREMENT: 2,591 UN
ADEQUATE: 1,265 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 1,326 UN
~1 Phase 10. (Current Mission).
PROJECT: Replace hlilitary Family Housin,.
REQUIRE~XIENT: This project is required to provide modern and efficient housin,0 for military members and their
dependents stnttoncd at hlinot AFB. Units will bc new construction to replace units removed by the Walking Shield
program and will provide a safe, comfortable, and appealm,(1 living environment comparable to the off-base civilian
zommuntty. This project IS programmed in accordance with the f lousing Community Plan. The new housing units will
provide a modern kitchen. livin,(7 room. and bath configuration with ample interior and exterior storage plus an
additional 700 SF per unit to provide an indoor “Arctic” recreation room as authorized for harsh climate bases. Single
Jr double car parages 1, ill be provided. Off street parking will be provided for a second vehicle if a double car garage
IS not provided.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
381
COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
1 2. DATE
I
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE. NORTH DAKOTA
5. PROJECT NUMBER
4. PROJECT TITLE
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING PHASE IO
QJVFO49001
CURRENT SITUATION: This project was originally programmed to replace the relocatable units that were put at
Minot AFB in the late 1960s to support the Space Win,0 mission. The relocatables are currently being removed through
the Walking Shield program and moved to various Indian reservations at no expense to the Air Force. The Walking
shield program is saving Minot AFB approximately S2.1 million in demolition costs. This also provides a clean site to
build on. With the shortened construction season at MAFB and the scope of the MFH program it is imperative that we
have a clean site to build on. Therefore, the demolition costs saved on this phase can then be used for demolition of
176 units on phase 11 and the conveying of 24 units to Walking Shield.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Air Force members and their families will be housed in unsatisfactory facilities. which
will contribute to lowered morale. Housing inventory will continue to deteriorate without capital improvements.
Without this project, the repair of these units will occur in a more costly, piecemeal fashion with little overall
improvement to the quality of living.
ADDITIONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part II of the Military Handbook 1190, Facility
Planning Design Guide. The improvement cost represents 7 1.3% of the replacement cost. Since this is replacement
housing, there will be no increase in the student population or impact on the local school district to support base
dependents. 5.7% Supervision, Inspection, and Overhead (SIOH) is being programmed for Army Corps of Engineers.
The neighborhood support infrastructure will be upgraded to meet modern housing needs, to include landscaping,
playgrounds and recreation areas. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1 Les Martin. (701) 723-3895.
3D FORM 1391c. DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
382
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
f=Y 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE. NORTH DAKOTA
5. PROJECT NUMBER
4. PROJECT TITLE
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING PHASE 10
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
QJVFO49001
(1) Status:
( a ) Date Design Started
( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs
( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002
( d ) Date 35% Designed
( e ) Date Design Complete
( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed;
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where design was most recently used (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ):
( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications
( b ) All other Design Costs
( c ) Total
( d ) Contract
( e ) In-house
.
Design/Bid/Build
02 Jul31
N
35
02 Dee 20
03 May 30
NO
N/A
($1.880)
1,880
0
1,880
1,880
(4) Construction Start
04 Mar
(5) Construction Completion
05 Jun
). Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A
ID FORM 1391~. DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
383
3. DOD COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
5. DATA AS OF
May-01
,.
._......_.
-
-
.~
b. LOCATION
NORTH DAKOTA
PRO.lFCTFll
CURRENT
E9-E7
OFFICER
lb)
(a)
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
5. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
DD-ABL(AR)1716
2. FISCAL YEAR
2004
1. DATE OF REPORT
Aug-01
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
a. NAME
Phase 10
MINOT AIR FORCE BASE
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
EG-El
w
TOTAL
(d)
OFFICER
(e)
E9-E7
(0
E~-EI
(9)
TOTAL
0’0
580
334
3,753
4,667
570
341
3.677
4.588
580
334
3.753
4,667
570
341
3,677
4,588
~~
7 PFRMANFNT PARTY PERSONNEL
3. GROSS FAMILY HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
a. INVOLUNTARILY SEPARATED
b. IN MILITARY HOUSING TO BE
DISPOSED/REPLACED
c. UNACCEPTABLE HOUSED IN COMMUNITY
0. VOLUNTARY SEPARATIONS
1
I
IIDFUENTC
” Dcnl
r\LY”II\LI.ILI.
I”
1. EFFECTIVE HOUSlh.IC
5
1
I
6
1
I
22
)
I
33
1
I
5
6
1
I
I
22
I
i
2. ,.lnl
h\
. - -IPINC
-. . _ - ,ASSFTS
.-- - . - la
\ - + -,
479
326
1.959
2,764
476
333
1,939
2.748
474
254
1.459
2,187
474
254
1,459
2.187
2.187 i
4:,
a. UNDER MILITARY CONTROL
II1 HOUSED IN EXISTING DOD
_....__.__
-
I FD
.-----
I
’ ’ ~WNFI-VCONTRC-H
474
1
240
1
1.459
1
/
29
/
1,~
/
2.b”
I
i
(2) UNDER CONTRACT/APPROVED
I
(3) VACANT
0
0
0
0
5
72
500
577
(4) INACTIVE
-.h
PRIVATE
- - HOUSING
- (I) ACCEPTABLY HOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLE VACANT RENTAL
3. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
5. REMARKS
.
Item 12.a.(l):
1326 on-base units are inadequate.
157 surplus units (84 Officer, 18 SNCO, 55 JNCO) will be demolished when useful life ends.
384
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
COMMAND:
5. AREA CONST
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE,
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
COST INDEX
SOUTH DAKOTA
0.91
6. Personnel
PERNIANENT
1
STUDENTS [
SUPPORTED
I
I
Strength
OFF
ENL
CIV OFF ENL CIV
ENL
CIV
TOTAL
OFF
AS OF 30 SEP 02
336
3066 377
0
5
2
1
1
54
3,842
END FY 2007
336
3065 377
0
5
2
1
1
54
3,841
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
6,395
Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
1,749,801 8 I
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
24,441
Authorization Requested in this Program:
16,24r
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
14,89
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
46,101
Remaining Deficiency:
I
Grand Total:
1,851,49!
3. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
CODE
711-142
PROJECT TITLE
Replace Family Housing
(FY 2004)
SCOPE
75 UN
3a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
711-142
Replace Family Housing
(FY2005)
83 UN
3b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
‘1 l-142
‘11-142
‘11-142
Replace Family Housing
Replace Family Housing
Replace Family Housing
COST DESIGN STATUS
$.OOO S T A R T C M P L
16,240 Jul-02
May-O:
14,897
(FYO6-09)
98 UN
93 UN
64 UN
)c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
IO. Mission or Major Functions: A wing with two B-l squadrons.
17,188
17,515
11,401
64,176
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2 DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4 PROJECT TITLE
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE. SOUTH DAKOT.+\
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
8874 1
REPLACE FAhlILY HOUSING PHASE 3
7 PROJECT NUMBER
71 l-142
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
IXBh199350-t
16.740
0 COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
UTILITY MAINS
STREETS
LANDSCAPING
RECREATION
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (5.75)
TOTAL REQUEST
U/M
LIN
OUANTIN
UNIT COST
75
126.440
COST
6000)
.
9.483
5,149
(1.973)
(672)
(793)
(497)
(314)
(900)
14,632
732
15,364
876
16,240
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
0.91
AREA COST FACTOR
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: Replace - houslng umts. includes demc ion, site
zlearinf. replacement/upgrade of utility systems and roads. and dcslfn/construction of single and duplex housing units
Nith basements. Provides normal amenities, to include appliances. garapes, parking. air conditioning, patios, privacy
renting. neighborhood playgrounds. and recreation areas. Provides fire detection.
Pavqrade Bedroom
El-E6
3
El-E6
4
E7-E9
3
E7-E9
4
Programmed
@J
pK3.J
1,315
1,630
1,573
1,950
1,500
1,860
1,734
2,150
GSM
151
181
172
200
Project
Factor
0.946
0.946
0.946
0.946
Cost Per
GSM
$754
$754
$754
$754
No
Units
8
25
30
12
75
($000)
w
862
3,228
3,681
1.712
9,483
Maximum size: El-E6/3 Bedroom (1370 NSF11760 GSF)
Waximum size: El-E6/J Bedroom (1790 NSF/2XO GSF)
Maximum size: E7-E9/3 Bedroom (1650 NSF/3050 GSF)
Maximum size: E7-EO/J Bedroom (3020 NSF/X00 GSF)
Il. REQUIREMENT: 2.108 UN
ADEQUATE: 1,605 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 503 UN
~1 Phase 3. (Current Mission).
‘ROJECT: Replace hlllltary Farnil!, Housin,.
IEOUIREMENT: This project is required to provide modern and efticient housin,(7 for military members and their
dependents stationed at Ellsworth AFB. All units will meet “whole house” standards and are programmed in
Iccordancc \\ith the Housing Communitv Plan. Replacement housing will provide a safe. comfortable. and appealing
ivinf environment comparable to the off base civilian community. This is the second phase of an initiative to provide
Idequate housing for base personnel. The replacement housin,(1 uill provide a modern kitchen. IlvlnE room, family
oom and bath configuration. \b Ith ample Intcrlor and cuterior storafc. A double car garage will be provided. The basic
leishborh<,od support Infrastructure will be upcraded 10 meet modern housirw needs. Neiehborhood enhancements
ID FORM 1391, DEC 76
‘AGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
. .
--....
-..-...
AIR FORCE
L.
Y”IL
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE. SOUTH DAKOTA
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING PHASE 3
I
FXBM994504
I
will include landscaping. playgrounds. and recreation areas. Proper drsposal of asbestos and lead-based paint is
included. The expansive clay soils require special foundation consrdcrations. Antiterrorism/force protection measures
are included.
CURRENT SITUATION: This project replaces housing that was constructed in 1961-1964. They have had no major
upgrades or renovation since construction, and do not meet the needs of today’s families, nor do they provide a modern
home environment. Kitchens are undersized and do not provide adequate cabinet and countertop space. The bathrooms
are small and in poor condition. Bathroom fixtures and lighting thrclughout the houses are outdated and energy
inefficient. The exterior of these units lack landscaping and recreation space. There are no garages, and vehicles are
subjected to extremely cold winters with no protection from the elements. There is inadequate exterior storage. There
is no ground fault circuit interrupter protection as required by current National Electrical building codes. There is no
air conditioning. The current Housing Market Analysrs recommends no reduction in military family houses. Ellsworth
has a vision of walkable neighborhoods as an investment In a qualtty of life initiative. This initiative is a commitment
to the Air Force (AF) mission and an improved sense of community or social cohesion among AF personnel and their
families.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: AF members and their families will continue to live in extremely outdated, unsuitable
and unsatisfactory housing. This 40 to 43 year old housin=(* neighborhood will continue to deteriorate with age,
resulting in increasing and unacceptable maintenance and repair costs. and extreme inconvenience to the occupants.
Without this and subsequent phases of this initiative. repairs will continue in a costly, piecemeal fashion with little or
no improvement in occupant quality of life. These deticiencres will continue to adversely affect the morale of all
personnel assigned to Ellsworth AFB.
ADDJTIONAL: An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of new construction,
revitalization. leasing and status quo operation. Based on the net present values and benefits of the respective
alternatives. the status quo operatron was found to be the most cost efficient over the life of the project. However. this
alternative is unacceptable because it does not repair the deteriorated structures and would force Air Force personnel to
continue to live in inadequate housing. Since this is replacement housing there will be no increase in the student
population or impact on the ability of the local school to support base dependents. The improvement cost is 120% of
the replacement cost. The SIOH is 5.7% since the Army Corp of Engineers will be the construction agent. Base Civil
Engineer: Lt Col Richard (605) 385-2658
DD FORM 1391 c, DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
387
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE. SOUTH DAK0T.A
5. PROJECT NUMBER
4. PROJECT TITLE
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING PHASE 3
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
FXBM993504
(1) Status:
( a ) Date Design Started
( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs
( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002
( d ) Date 35% Designed
( e ) Date Design Complete
( f) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed;
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where design was most recently used (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ):
( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications
( b ) All other Design Costs
( c ) Total
( d ) Contract
( e ) In-house
03 Jul31
N
35
02 Dee 15
03 May 15
NO
N/A
($745)
745
0
745
745
04 May
(4) Construction Start
05 Jul
(5) Construction Completion
). Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A
ID FORM 1391~. DEC 76
PAGE NO
Design/Bid/Build
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
Sep-00
(DD-ABL(AR)1716
b. LOCATION
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE
5. DATA AS OF
2000
2004
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
a. NAME
3. DOD COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
Phase 3
SOUTH DAKOTA
I
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
CURRENT
OFFICER
E9-E7
(b)
(a)
395
283
E6-El
w
TOTAL
W
2.591
3,269
PROJECTED
OFFICER
E9-E7
(e)
(0
376
205
E6-El
(9)
TOTAL
(h)
,
2,631
3,292
7. PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL
5. REMARKS
Item 12.a.(l):
503 on-base units are inadequate.
392 surplus units (198 Officer, 133 SNCO, 61 JNCO) will be demolished when useful life ends.
389
1. COMPONENT
1 FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 12. DATE
AIR FORCE
COMMAND:
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
5. AREA CONST
DYE!% AIR FORCE, TEXAS
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
COST INDEX
0.97
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF ENL CIV
OFF ENL CIV
OFF
ENL
CIV
TOTAL
60
5,49! 3
1
9
0
10
332
394
289 4400
AS OF 30 SEP 02
60
1
9
5,48;7
0
10
332
394
289 4392
END FY 2007
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
6,342
Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
1,345,45 I2
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
28,65 ‘4
Authorization Requested in this Program:
19,97 3
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
42,69 5
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
65,04 7
Remaining Deficiency:
0
Grand Total:
1,501,82 1
3. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
ZATEGORY
ZODE
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Family Housing
(FY 2004)
SCOPE
116 UN
COST DESIGN STATUI;
$,OOO S T A R T C M P L
19,973 Jul-02
May-O 3
(FY 2005)
)a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
‘1 l-142
Replace Family Housing
‘1 l-142
Replace Family Housing
84 UN
110 UN
)b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
‘11-142
Replace Family Housing
‘11-142
Replace Family Housing
.
‘11-142
Replace Family Housing
110UN
110 UN
96 UN
20,745
21,950
(FYO6-09)
21,139
21,541
22,367
118,481 3
#c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
0. Mission or Major Functions: A wing with three B-l bomber squadrons, one of which is responsible
or training all B-l aircrews, and two C-l 30 airlift squadrons in an AMC airlift group.
330
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
.I PROJECT TITLE
DYESS AIR FORCE BASE. TEXAS
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING PHASE 4
6. CATEGORY CODE
8874 1
7 PROJECT NUMBER
71 I-141
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
FNWZ01300 1
19,973
9 COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
UTILITY MAINS
STREETS
LANDSCAPING
RECREATION
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
ZONTINGENCY (5%)
I-OTAL CONTRACT COST
,
SUPERVISION INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (5.7% )
rOTAL REQUEST
U/M
QUANTITY
UNIT COST
UN
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
116
113,845
COST
ww
13,206
4.790
(610)
( 1.430)
(1.150)
(400)
(320)
(880)
17.996
900
18,896
1.077
19,973
WA COST FACTOR
0.97
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: Replacc 116 single and multiplex family housing units with
;III necessary amenities including sound reduction as needed and supporting facilities. Project includes site preparation,
;attached garages. air conditioning. vehicle parkin=.
0 exterior patios and privacy fencing, support infrastructure of roads
2md utilities. neighborhood playgrounds, recreation areas. and all landscaping. Includes demolition of 116 single and
Inultiplex housing units. site demolition and asbestos removal.
1
I
Pavorade Bedroom
El-E6
3
4
El-E6
Programmed
pJsJ
GSF
1,315
1,630
1,573
1,950
GSM
151
181
Project
Factor
0.970
0.970
Cost Per
GSM
$754
$754
No
Units
98
18
116
($000)
m
10,823
2,383
13,206
Ylaximum size: E I -E6/3 Bedroom (1420 NSF/1760 GSF)
vlaximum size: E 1 -Ebl-l Bedroom ( 1790 NSF/7210 GSF)
b
b
1 1. REQUIREMENT: 2,489 UN
ADEQUATE: 1,766 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 723 UN
0 Phase 4. (Current Mission).
z‘ROJECT: Replace Military Family Housin,.
EREQUIREMENT: This project is required tO provide modern and efficient housing for military members and their
dlependents stationed at Dyess AFB. All units will meet modern housin g standards and are programmed in accordance
vvith the Housing Community Profile. The housing will provide safe, comfortable, and appealing living environment
C omparable to the off-base civilian community. The design will provide a modern kitchen. living room, family room,
bledroom and bath configuration. with ample interior and exterior storage. The number of bedrooms will range from
11Iree to four. as identified in the most recent housing market analysis. Units will be provided with an attached garage
a nd exterior parklng for a second vehicle. Land area will be used for adequate infrastructure requirements (roads,
I-(xreatmns areas. utilities). This is the fourth phase of a multiphase initiative to replace all substandard housing units at
I:)yess AFB. Replacement of all supportin g facilities is required. To support the whole neighborhood concept, new
r(Dads. utility systems. neirhborhood playcrounds. recreation areas and area landscapin? must be installed.
DD FORM 1391, DEC 76,
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
391
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
DYESS AIR FORCE BASE. TEXAS
4. PROJECT TITLE
5. PROJECT NUMBER
REPLACE FAhlILY HOUSING PHASE 4
FNW~OLII~K)I
CURRENT SITUATION: Existing family housing units were constructed in 1957. They show the effects of age and
heavy use. These units have had no comprehensive up+c program since construction, and they do not meet the
needs of today’s military families, nor do they provide ;I modern home environment. Budget constraints have limited
Dyess AFB’s ability to maintain and repair these housln F units to mlnlmallv acceptable occupancy standards.
Interiors are inadequate by modern criteria. The existing Jnlousle Lvlndows-are those originally installed when the
housing units were constructed. These windows are dlfticult to open and drafty. with broken latches and cranks. These
Capehart units were constructed with one bathroom. \k hlch is small and lacks adequate closet space. Kitchens have
insufficient cabinets. storage and counter space.
Lighting. heating and air-conditioning systems require upgrade and replacement. Plumbing and electrical systems
are antiquated and do not meet current standards for efficiency and safety. Original aged electrical wiring is causing
increased faults and potential for fire and safety problcmh. The eslstlnp under-slab piping systems are old and
deteriorated. Frequency of leaking pipes under the concrete tloor slab IS increasing.
Roof, walls. foundations, and exterior pavements require maJor repalr or replacement due to age. Severe summer
heat. extreme winter freezing ice and snow storms, routine high \\ Inds and dust storms, frequent turbulent hail/
thunderstorms. occasional tornados and highly expansive clay soil conditions have an adverse aging effect on the
family housing units. The built-up roofing system on most housIng untt carports is old and deteriorated. The
membrane felts are cracking, blistering, and wrinkltng. Carport support structure and decking are experiencing
structural deterioration due to chronic leaks. Termtte damape to farnlly housing units is encountered frequently. The
existing concrete sidewalks and driveways are cracking and liftIn,.
(I- the potential for a tripping hazard exists. The
soffits and fascia on the family housing units are deterloratlng and need resurfacing. The shingle roofs are experiencing
serious loss of surfacing
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Air Force members and thclr famllles will be housed in unsatisfactory facilities, which
will contribute to lowered morale. Housing inventory will contlnuc to deteriorate without capital improvements.
Without this project. the repair of these units Lvill occur In a more costly. piecemeal fashion with little overall
improvement to the qualitv of living.
ADDITIONAL: A rate of 5.7% will be used for supervision. inspection, and overhead for using the Army Corps of
Engineers. This project meets the criteria/scope specified in part II of Military Handbook 1190. Facility Planning and
Design Guide. The local school authority indicates a capability exists to accept the increase in the student population
generated by this proJect. No additIona school construction kvill be required. An economic analysis has been prepared
comparing the alternatives of new construction and improvement. New construction was found to be most cost
effecti\,e over the life of the project. The cost to improve this housin,(7 is 113% of the replacement cost. Commander,
71h Ci\,il Engineer Squadron: Lt CoI Darren R. Danlels. (915) 696-2150.
I
DD FORM 1391 c, DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
392
2. DATE
1. COMPONEN r
AIR FORCE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
DYESS AIR FORCE BASE. TEXAS
5. PROJECT NUMBER
4. PROJECT TITLE
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING PHASE 4
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
FNWz04300 1
(1) Status:
( a ) Date Design Started
( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs
( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002
( d ) Date 35% Designed
( e ) Date Design Complete
( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed;
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where design was most recently used -
Design/Bid/Build
02 Ju126
N
35
62 Dee 13
03 May 30
NO
N/A
(3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e J:
( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications
( b ) All other Design Costs
( c ) Total
( d ) Contract
( e ) In-house
($910)
910
0
910
910
(4) Construction Start
04 Mar
(5) Construction Completion
05 Jun
b. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A
DD FORM 1391~. DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
393
DYES AIR FORCE BASE
OF
Item 12.a.41):
723 on-base units are inadequate.
394
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
2. DATE
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
COMMAND:
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
5. AREA CONST
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE,
AIR EDUCATION AND
COST INDEX
TRAINING
COMMAND
TEXAS
0.83
PERMANENT
5. Personnel
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF 1 ENL 1 CIV
OFF] ENL 1 CIV
OFF 1
ENL 1
CIV
TOTAI
4s OF 30 SEP 02
9601
21481 5079
4781
01
0
161
321
7
8,72
21251 53161 478)
7)
END FY 2007
9601
01
01
161
321
8,93
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
3,129
nventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
1,059,53r
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
19,31
Authorization Requested in this Program:
13,75
I
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
‘Ianned in Next Three Years Program:
22,15
I
qemaining Deficiency:
Zrand Total:
1,114,75:
3. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
ZATEGORY
PROJECT TITLE
;ODE
‘11-142
Replace Family Housing
(FY 2004)
SCOPE
96 UN
)a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program:
COST DESIGN STATUS
$,OOO S T A R T C M P L
13,754 Jul-02
May-O:
(FY 2005)
none
)b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
Replace Family Housing
‘11-142
Replace Family Housing
‘11-142
109 UN
64 UN
(FY 06-09)
14,557
7,600
tc. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
40,73:
0. Mission or Major Functions: Headquarters Air Education and Training Command, a flying training wing
vhich conducts navigator training and AETC instructor pilot training and the AF Personnel Center, the AF
services Agency, Hq AF Recruiting Service, the AF Manpower and Innovation Center, and an AMC airlift
light operating C-21 s.
L
)D Form 1390,24 Jul 00
395
I. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
4. PROJECT TITLE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE. TEXAS
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING PHASE 2
6. CATEGORY CODE
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
88741
71 l-142
7. PROJECT NUMBER
8. PROJECT COST (SOOO)
TYMX030004
13.754
9 COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
UTILITY MAINS
STREETS
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (5.7%)
TOTAL REQUEST
U/M
QUANTITY
UNIT COST
UN
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
96
98.260
COST
(SOOO)
9.433
2.959
(420)
( 1.039)
GW
(1,000)
12,392
620
13,012
742
13,754
AREA COST FACTOR
0.83
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: Replace 96 Wherry housing units. Includes demolition, site
clearing, replacement/upgrade/relocation of utility systems and roads. and construction of new multiplex housing.
Provides parking. exterior patios, and privacy fencin g. neighborhood playgrounds, recreation areas. Includes clean-up
of asbestos and lead based paint.
Project
Cost Per No
($000)
Bedroom
pJ!sJ
Units
Pavurade
GSF
GSM
Factor
Total
GSM
754
3
1,315
1,630
151
El-E6
0.863
9.433
!z
96
9,433
Maximum size: El-E6/3 Bedroom (1420 NSF/I760 GSF)
11. REQUIREMENT: 2,860 UN
ADEQUATE: 2,170 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 690 UN
?ROJECT: Replace Wherry Housing (Current Mission).
REQUIREMENT: This project is required to provide modern and efficient housing for military members and their
dependents stationed at Randolph AFB, TX. All units will meet whole house standards and are programmed in
accordance with the Housing Community Profile. Replacement housing will provide a safe, comfortable, and
appealing living environment comparable to the off base civilian community. This is the second phase of an initiative
o provide adequate housing for base personnel. The replacement housing will provide a modern kitchen, living room,
hmily room, three bedroom, and bath configuration. with ample interior and exterior storage and a single car garage.
Exterior parking will be provided for a second vehicle. The basic neighborhood support infrastructure will be upgraded
o meet modern housing needs. Neighborhood improvement include landscaping and recreation areas.
CURRENT SITUATION: The East and West Wherry units, constructed in 1962, are showing the effects of age and
:ontinuous heavy use. They have had no major upgrades since construction, and do not meet the needs of today’s
amilies. nor do they provide a modern home envtronment. Walls and exterior pavements require major replacement
lue to the effects of age and weather. Wall insulation IS inadequate. Plumbing and electrical systems are antiquated and
lo not meet current standard for efficiency or safety. There are no GFI circuits, and the number of outlets is minimal
vhich results in haphazard usage of extension cords. Housing interiors are inadequate by any modern criteria.
bedrooms are small and lack adequate closet space. Bathrooms are small, and fixtures are outdated and energy
nefficient. Kitchens have inadequate storage and counter space. cabinets are old and unsightly,
“L”
PAGE NO
l”lrn 1 “L UdLV
II” I L”lY,-tLL 1
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
1 2. DATE
AIR FORCE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE, TEXAS
4. PROJECT TITLE
5. PROJECT NUMBER
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING, PHASE 2
TYMX030004
countertops and sinks are badly worn. Flooring throughout the house is outdated. Lighting throughout the houses is
inefficient and does not meet modern needs. Heating and air conditioning systems require upgrade or replacement.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: AF personnel will continue to occupy substandard housing. The housing will continue
to be occupied until it becomes uninhabitable because adequate, affordable off-base housing is not available. The
current Housing Market for the base shows an on-base deficit. Without this project and subsequent phases of this
initiative, repairs of these units will be in a costly, piecemeal fashion, with no improvement in living quality.
ADDITIONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part II of Military Handbook 1190, Facility Planning
and Design Guide. An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of status quo operation,
replacement, and direct compensation. Based on the net present values and benefits of the respective alternatives, new
construction was found to be the most cost efficient over the life of the project. The cost to improve this housing is
72% of the replacement cost. The SIOH is 5.7% since the Army Corp of Engineers will be the construction agent.
Base Civil Engineer: Lt Col Allen J. Benefield. (210) 652-2301.
LID FORM 1391c. DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
2. DATE
AIR FORCE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE. TEXAS
4. PROJECT TITLE
5. PROJECT NUMBER
REPLACE FAMILY HOUSING, PHASE 2
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
(1) status:
( a ) Date Design Started
( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs
( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002
( d ) Date 35% Designed
( e ) Date Design Complete
( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where design was most recently used (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e J:
( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications
( b ) All other Design Costs
( c ) Total
( d ) Contract
( e ) In-house
TYMX030004
Design/Bid/Build
02 Jul20
N
35
02 Dee 20
03 May 20
\
NO
N/A
($630)
630
0
630
630
04 Mar
(4) Construction Start
05 Jul
(5) Construction Completion
3. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A
)D FORM 1391c. DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UhTIL EXHAUSTED
398
1. DATE OF REPORT
act-00
4. REPORTING INSTALLATION
a. NAME
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING JUSTIFICATION
3. DOD COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. FISCAL YEAR
2004
b. LOCATION
Phase 2
RANDOLPH AIR FORCE BASE
5. DATA AS OF
2000
ANALYSIS
OF
REQUIREMENTS AND ASSETS
6. TOTAL PERSONNEL STRENGTH
REPORT CONTROL SYMBOL
DD-A&L(AR)1716
CURRENT
O F F I C E R I E9-E7
(a)
1
(bJ
TEXAS
E6-El
(Cl
TOTAL
VU
PROJECTED
OFFICER
E9-E7
W
(0
E6-El
(9)
TOTAL
P)
1,379
775
1.236
3,390
1,439
a32
1.680
3,951
1,379
775
1.236
3,390
1,439
a32
1,690
3,951
7. PERMANENT PARTY PERSONNEL
a . GROSS FAMILY HOUSING
Item 12.a.(l):
REQUIREMENTS
690 on-base units are inadequate.
1. COMPONENT
1
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
12. DATE
AIR FORCE
COMMAND:
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
5. AREA CONST
LAJES AIR BASE, PORTUGAL
U.S. AIR FORCES IN EUROPE COST INDEX
1.28
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
SUPPORTED
Strength
OFF ENL
OFF ENL CIV
CIV
OFF
ENL
CIV
AS OF 30 SEP 02
96
853
692
20
69
6
4
6
45
END FY 2007
96
853
693
20
69
6
4
6
45
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
944
Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
TOTAL
1,79 11
1,79‘2
732,16 0
0
13,42 8
0
/0
I0
745,58( 8
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
/C ATEGORY
ICODE
PROJECT TITLE
71 l-142
Replace Family Housing
(FY 2004)
COST DESIGN STATUS;
SCOPE
$.OOO S T A R T C M P L
42 UN
13,428 Jul-02
May-O:3
,3a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
Replace Family Housing
711-142
none
I3b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
711-142
Replace Family Housing
none
(FY 2005)
(FYO6-09)
(3c. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
19,93: 3
10. Mission or Major Functions: The host air base wing provides en route support to transiting aircraft and
tcosts Headquarters US Forces Azores. Lajes Field serves as a logistical bridge to Europe, Africa, and
,Southwest Asia by providing a ground refueling and stop-over capability, functioning as a tanker staging
;ocation for in-flight refueling and serving as a primary divert base for deploying aircraft.
400
1. COMPONENT
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. PROJECT TITLE
LAJES FIELD. PORTUGAL
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
PHASE 3
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
8. PROJECT COST (SOOO)
7. PROJECT NUMBER
711.112
13,428
MQNA023005
9. COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
UTILITY MAINS
STREETS
LANDSCAPING
RECREATION
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (6.5%)
TOTAL REQUEST
U/M
QUANTITY
UNIT COST
UN
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
42
186,976
COST
ww
7.853
4.155
(880)
6-w
(920)
(340)
(235)
(955)
12,008
600
12,608
820
13,428
AREA COST FACTOR
1.28
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: Replace 42 housing units. Includes demolition, site
clearing, replacement/upgrade of utility systems and roads, and construction of new multiplex family housing units.
Provides normal amenities to include appliances, storage. off-street parking, patios, privacy fencing, landscaping, and
neighborhood playgrounds. Includes asbestos and lead based paint removal.
Pavorade Bedroom
El-E6
3
04-05
06
3
4
Programmed
pJsJ
GSF
GSM
1,630
151
1,315
1,629
2,032
2,020
2,520
Project
Factor
Cost Per
GSM
$764
$764
$764
1.408
1.408
187
234
1.408
No
Units
18
22
2
42
($000)
Total
2,924
4,425
504
7,853
vIaximum size: El-E613 Bedroom (1420 NSF/1760 GSF)
vIaximum size: 04-05/3 Bedroom ( 1850 NSF/2300 GSF)
vIaximum size: 0614 Bedroom
(2350 NSF/2930 GSF)
Il. REQUIREMENT: 561 UN
ADEQUATE: 369 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 192 UN
‘ROJECT: Replace Military Family Housin,.
(1 Phase 3. (Current Mission).
<EQUIREMENT: This project is required to provide modern and efficient replacement housing for military members
ind their dependents stationed at Lajes Field. Azores. All units will meet “whole house” standards and are programmed
n accordance with the Housing Community Plan and the Housing Master Plan. Replacement housing will provide a
afe, comfortable, and appealing living environment comparable to typical off-base civilian communities found in the
,ontinental United States. This is the third phase of multiple phases to provide adequate housing for base personnel
.ssigned to a remote location. The first two phases have been funded and are under construction providing 1 I4 new
eplacement units. This replacement project will provide a modern kitchen. livinr! room. dining room, and bathroom
Isln
PAGE NO
I
YL
“c)LY
II”
1
l-r
II”T)LL
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
I
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
LtUES FIELD. PORTUGAL
4. PROJECT TITLE
5. PROJECT NUMBER
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING PHASE 3
MQNA023005
configuration with ample interior and exterior storage and a single car garage. Exterior parking will be provided for a
second occupant vehicle and guests. The basic neighborhood support infrastructure will be upgraded.
CURRENT SITUATION: This project replaces housin,0 units constructed in 1952 and 1961. These 41-plus year old
homes have long been showing the effects of age, continuous heavy use. and the harsh climatic environment associated
with being located in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean. Heavy rains that are routinely driven by hurricane-force winds
subject the residents to poor drainage, leaking windows and doors. and infiltration. The units have had no major
upgrades since construction and do not meet the needs of today’s families. nor do they provide a modem home
environment. Roofs, floors, and pavements require extensive repairs and replacement. Plumbing, electrical, and
mechanical systems are antiquated, require excessive maintenance, and do not meet current standards for efficiency and
safety. Sinks, tubs, and sanitary lines drain exceptionally slow resultin,u in health hazards. Scaling in the sewer lines
has significantly reduced the systems capacity causing frequent backups. Electrical systems lack ground fault circuits
in bathrooms, kitchens, and on exterior outlets causing breakers to trip regularly. Interiors are generally inadequate by
modern standards. Bathrooms are small with outdated fixtures. kitchens have inadequate storage and counter space,
floors and counter tops are badly worn and cabinets are old and unsightly. Lead based paint and asbestos are present.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Air Force members and their families will continue to live in outdated and
unsatisfactory housing. As a result, major morale problems will continue to be an issue at this remote and isolated
location. The existing housing will continue to deteriorate with age, driving up maintenance and repair costs, as well as
impacting the quality of life of its occupants. Piecemeal repairs will continue with little or no substantive improvement
in the resident’s standards of living.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been programmed in accordance with the criteria and scope limitations outlined in
AFI 32-6003, Family Housing Plannin,,
u Programming. Design. and Construction. Since this is replacement housing,
there will be no impact on the student population at the local DOD school. An economic analysis has been prepared
comparing the alternatives of new construction, revitalization, leasin,0 and status quo operation. Based on the net
present values and benefits of the respective alternatives. new construction was found to be the most cost efficient over
the life of the project. The improvement cost is 80% of the replacement cost. This project is not eligible for NATO
funding. The Naval Facilities Command will be the construction agent. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Col Terry Watkins,
DSN 5356113.
The project will be solicited and awarded with US dollar.
ID FORM 1391c, DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
402
2. DATE
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
LAJES FIELD. PORTUGAL
5. PROJECT NUMBER
4. PROJECT TITLE
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING PHASE i
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
MQNA023005
(1) Status:
( a ) Date Design Started
( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs
( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002
( d ) Date 3.5%- Designed
( e ) Date Design Complete
( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed;
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where design was most recently used (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ):
( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications
( b ) All other Design Costs
( c ) Total
( d ) Contract
( e ) In-house
Design/Bid/Build
02 Jul29
N
35
02 Dee 14
03 May 30
NO
N/A
($615)
615
0
615
615
(4) Construction Start
04 Mar
(5) Construction Completion
05 Jun
1. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A
ID FORM 1391c, DEC 76
AGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
403
LAJES FIELD
OWNED/CONTROLLED
(3) VACANT
0
0
0
16
2
66
16
2
aa
0
(4) INACTIVE
b. PRIVATE HOUSING
106
(1) ACCEPTABLY HOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLEVACANTRENTAL
3. EFFECTIVE HOUSING DEFICIT
I
”
”
I
I
I
I
n
I
I
I
I
n
”
106
I
,
n
”
I
4. PROPOSED PROJECT
5. REMARKS
Item 12.a.(l):
192 on-base units are inadequate.
404
1. COMPONENT
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM 2. DATE
AIR FORCE
COMMAND:
INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
5. AREA CONST
INCIRLIK AIR BASE, TURKEY
AIR COMBAT COMMAND
COST INDEX
0.91
STUDENTS
8. Personnel
PERMANENT
SUPPORTED
ENL
CIV
Strength
OFF ENL CIV
OFF ENL CIV
OFF
89
229
0
0
0
1807
133 1246 255
4s OF 30 SEP 02
89
229
0
0
0
1807
133 1255 255
END FY 2007
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
3,328
Total Acreage:
nventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
4uthorization Not Yet in Inventory:
l\uthorization Requested in this Program:
4uthorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
‘Ianned in Next Three Years Program:
?emaining Deficiency:
Zrand Total:
I
3. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
ZATEGORY
PROJECT TITLE
ZODE
‘1 l-142
Replace Family Housing
TOTAL
3,759
3,768
779
8
17
I
I
806,251
(FY 2004)
SCOPE
100 UN
COST DESIGN STATUS
$,OOO S T A R T C M P L
May-O:
17,538 Jul-02
(FY 2005)
)a. Future Projects: Included in the Following Program
none
(FYO6-09)
lb. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years:
none
14,19I
Ic. Real Propery Maintenance Backlog This Installation
0. Mission or Major Functions: The 39th Wing provides host services to forces deployed in support
If Operation Northern Watch. It is also home to an AMC Air Mobility Squadron.
ID
Form 1390,24 Jul 00
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
AIR FORCE
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4 PROJECT TITLE
INCIRLIK AIR BASE, TURKEY
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
1 6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
1 7. PROJECT NUMBER
71 l-142
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
LJYCO34004
9 COSTE
ITEM
U/M
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
UTILITY MAINS
STREETS
LANDSCAPING
RECREATION
FORCE PROTECTION
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
CONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (6.5%)
TOTAL REQUEST
17.538
rIMATE
QUANTITY
100
UN
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
UNIT COST
137,410
COST
($000)
13.741
I.943
(300)
(350)
(300)
(140)
(113)
(450)
2%
‘784
16,468
1,070
17,538
0.91
AREA COST FACTOR
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: Rep~acc I VU nousmg untts. tnctudes, den70 lition, site
:learing. replacement/upgrade of utility systems and roads. and construction of new multiplex units. Provide normal
amenities to include vehicle parkin g. air conditioning. exterior patios. privacy fencing and playgrounds. Includes
Demolition. asbestos and lead-based paint removal.
..a
Paygrade Bedroom
4
El-E6
E7-E9 101-3 4
04-05
06
06+ SCP
07
4
4
4
4
Programmed
NSF
GSF
1,573
1.950
1,734
2,150
1,863
2,310
2,032
2,235
2,686
vlasimum size: E 1 -E6/4 Bedroom
tiaximum size: E7-E9/4 Bedroom
viaximum size: 04-05/4 Bedroom
vlaximum size: 0614 Bedroom
tiaximum size: 0614 Bedroom SCP
Ylaximum size: 07/4 Bedroom
Il. REQUIREMENT: 850 UN
2,520
2,772
3,330
GSM
181
200
Project
Factor
0.910
215
234
258
309
0.910
0.910
0.910
0.910
0.910
Cost Per
GSM
$764
$764
$764
$764
$764
$764
.
No
Units
50
($000)
Total
6,292
1
1
IOG
215
13,741
14
32
2
1,946
4.783
326
179
(1790 NSF/2220 GSF)
(2020 NSF/2500 GSF)
(2 I80 NSF/2700 GSF)
(3350 NSF/2920 GSF)
(2585 NSF/32 12 GSF)
(3270 NSF/4060 GSF)
ADEQUATE: 582 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 268 UN
‘ROJECT: Replace Military Family Housing. Project includes replacement of one General Officers Quarters.
Current Mission)
ID FORM 1391, DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
406
AIR FORCE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
INCIRLIK AIR BASE. TURKEY
5. PROJECT NUMBER
4. PROJECT TITLE
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
LJYCO33004
REQUIREMENT: The project is required to provide modern and efficient housing for military members and their
dependants stationed at Incirlik AB. All units will meet “whole-house” standards and are programmed in accordance
with the Family Housing Master Plan. Replacement housing will provide a safe, comfortable, and appealing living
environment. The new housing units will provide a modern kitchen. laundry room, family room. living room. bedroom
and bath configuration, with ample interior and exterior storage and a single car garage. Exterior parking will be
provided for a second occupant car or guests.
CURRENT SITUATION: The current MFH at Incirlik consists of 900 units; 750 units were constructed in 1983 thru
1985; 582 of these units are adequate facilities and I68 umts need improvements to meet acceptable living standards.
The remaining 1.50 units were constructed in 1961, which are in substandard condition and beyond economical
upgrade/improvement. These units were surplus and prefabricated buildings, which were constructed into housing.
Despite extensive maintenance and repair efforts and expenses. settlement and shifting of foundations continue to cause
structural damages. Electric. mechanical, and other utility systems are outdated and do not meet USAF code
regulations, energy capacity and efficiency requirements. The off-base housing is not a viable option at Incirlik due to
force protection requirements. Incirlik’s geographical location in relation to Iran, Iraq and other hot spots in the Middle
East makes it a primary target for terrorist activity endangering the llves of our military and U.S. Government civilian
personnel and their families.
[MPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: The assigned personnel and their families will continue to be housed in substandard
housing units, resulting in poorer quality of life. These unsatisfactory conditions will affect the morale and welfare of
3ur military personnel and their families. Also. the U.S. Government will continue to spend MFW funds conducting
3iecemeal maintenance and repair on outdated facilities.
4DDITIONAL: This project is not eligible for NATO funding. This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part
[I of Military Handbook 1190, “Facility Planning and Design Guide”. An Economic Analysis has been prepared
:omparing the alternatives of new construction and status quo operation. Based on the net present values and benefit of
he respective alternatives, new construction was found to be most cost effective over the life of the project.
:mprovement is not considered as a viable alternative because of the unrecoverable foundation problems. The cost to
mprove this housing is lOtI%+ of the replacement cost. There will be no increase in the student population generated
with this project. SIOH is 6.5% to fund U.S. Army Corps of Engineers execution agent and Air Force oversight. Base
3ivil Engineer: Larry L. Meinders, Civ., DSN 676-6898.
The project will be solicited and awarded with US dollar.
ID FORM 1391~. DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
407
AIR FORCE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
INCIRLIK AIR BASE. TURKEY
5. PROJECT NUMBER
4. PROJECT TITLE
LJYC03400-l
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
Design/Bid/Build
( 1) Status:
( a ) Date Design Started
( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs
( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002
( d ) Date 35% Designed
( e ) Date Design Complete
( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed;
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where design was most recently used -
03 Jul31
N
35
02 Dee 15
03 May 15
NO
N/A
(3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ):
( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications
( b ) All other Design Costs
( c ) Total
( d ) Contract
( e ) In-house
($730)
730
0
730
730
(4) Construction Start
04 Apr
(5) Construction Completion
05 Sep
1. Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A
PAGE NO
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
INCIRLIK AIR BASE
(2) ACCEPTABLE VACANT RENTAL
14. PROPOSED PROJECT
15. REMARKS
Item 12.a.(l):
268 on-base units are inadequate.
50 surplus units (18 Officer, 22 SNCO, 10 JNCO) will be demolished when useful life ends.
409
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
1
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM
COMMAND:
5. AREA CONST
RAF LAKENHEATH, GREAT BRITAIN
I
6. Personnel
PERMANENT
STUDENTS
OFF/ ENL 1 CIV
1 CIV
OFF 1 ENL
‘Strength
0
01
01
41831 652
5201
AS OF 30 SEP 02
01
01
01
41911 6581
5201
END FY 2007
7. INVENTORY DATA ($000)
Total Acreage:
2,004
Inventory Total as of : (30 Sep 02)
Authorization Not Yet in Inventory:
Authorization Requested in this Program:
Authorization Included in the Following Program:
(FY 2005)
Planned in Next Three Years Program:
Remaining Deficiency:
Grand Total:
8. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
711-142
Replace Family Housing
12. DATE
1.35
SUPPORTED
OFF 1
ENL 1
61
41
61
4)
CIV
45
45
TOTP
5.4
514:
1,234.2~
118.7;
23.6~
24,O;
loo,91
1.501.6:
(FY 2004)
COST DESIGN STATU
SCOPE
$,OOO S T A R T C M P L
89 UN
23,640 Jut-02
May-C
t3a. Future Projects: Included in the Followrng Program
711-142
Replace Family Housing
87 UN
!3b. Future Projects: Typical Planned Next Three Years.
/711-142
Replace Family Housing
1711-142
Replace Family Housing
;711-142
Replace Family Housing
i‘11-142
Replace Family Housing
87
87
87
87
(FY 2005)
24,073
(FYO6-09)
UN
UN
UN
UN
25,470
24,995
25,955
24,529
E)c. Real Proper-y Maintenance Backlog This lnstallatron
114.07
1IO. Mission or Major Functtons: A fighter wing equipped with two squadrons of F-l 5Es and one squadron c
FI-1 5C/Ds.
410
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4
RAF LAKENHEATH. UNITED KINGDOXI
5. PROGRAM ELEMENT
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
6. CATEGORY CODE
88741
PROJECT TITLE
7. PROJECT NUMBER
71 l-142
8. PROJECT COST ($000)
XlSET044034
23.640
9 COST ESTIMATE
ITEM
MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
SITE IMPROVEMENTS
UTILITY MAINS
STREETS’
LANDSCAPING
RECREATION
DEMOLITION
SUBTOTAL
ZONTINGENCY (5%)
TOTAL CONTRACT COST
SUPERVISION INSPECTION AND OVERHEAD (-lr;; j
TOTAL REQUEST
U/M
QUANTITY
UNIT COST
1:s
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
89
168,056
COST
ww
14,957
6.692
(2,065)
(2.290)
(749)
(170)
(330)
(1,088)
21,649
1.082
22.73 I
909
23,640
4REA COST FACTOR
1.35
10. DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRlrCTION. Replaic S9 housing units. Includes demolition, site
:learinf. replacement/up~rading utility systems. ne\v roads. and cc)nstruction of new single and multiplex units meeting
urrent size standards. Provide normal amenities including parhrng. farafes, patios, privacy fencing, support
nfrastructure of roads and utilities. neighborhood playgrounds. and recreation areas.
Payorade Bedroom
El-E6
3
E7-E9
3
Programmed
pK3J
GSF
1,315
1,630
1,500
1,860
GSM
151
172
Project
Factor
Cost Per
GSM
No
Units
-
($000)
u
1.404
1.404
$764
$764
65
24
89
10.529
4,428
14,957
lllaximum size: E I -E6/3 Bedroom ( 1420 NSF/l 760 GSF)
vlaximum SIZC: E7-E9/3 Bedroom (1650 NSF/2050 GSF)
1. REQUIREMENT: 5.094 UN
ADEQUATE: 4,528 UN
SUBSTANDARD: 566 UN
‘ROJECT: Replace 89 housing units. Includes demo. site clearing. replacement/upgrade of utilities, new roads, and
onstructk)n of new single and multiplex units meeting current size standards. Provide parking, garages, fencing,
kiyfrounds. and support infrastructure. (Current Mission)
!EQl~IKl:1IENT: This project is required to pro\,idc modern and cflicient housing for military members stationed at
:AF Lahcnheath and RAF Mildenhall. All units will meet “whole-house” standards and are programmed in
ccordance \vith the Housing Community Profile. Replacement housing will provide safe, comfortable, and appealing
lvinf en\ ironments comparable to the off-base civilian community. This project is one of multiple phases to provide
dequate housrns for hase personnel. The replacement housing \\111 provide a modern kitchen, laundry room, family
oom. Iivins room. bedroom and bath conft~urntion. with ample interior and exterior storage and a single car garage.
larking \\ill he provided for a second occupant vehicle and guests. Replacement construction includes reconfiguring
ei~hborh~~od to create sense of communitv and increase cfliciency. Neiphborhood support infrastructure will be
:placcd or upsradcd IO meet modern need;. Ne\r landscapin;. playgrounds. and recreation areas will enhance the
eichhorhood.
ru‘ylti I DC “3CU II” I C”lYHLL T
PAGE NO
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
AIR FORCE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
RAF LAKENHEATH. UNITED KINGDOhl
4. PROJECT TITLE
5. PROJECT NUMBER
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
MSET044024
CURRENT SITUATION: This project replaces 89 housmg units which were constructed in 1950. These 50-plus yearold houses are showing the effects of age and continuous heavy use. They have had no major upgrades since
construction and do not meet the needs of today’s families. nor do they provide a modem home environment.
Plumbing and electrical systems are antiquated and do not meet modem building codes. Electrical systems are
undersized and quantity of receptacles is inadequate. Llghtmg systems throughout the houses are inefficient and
require replacement. Existing house plans do not meet suitability standards. Three-bedroom units have only one
undersized bathroom per unit and do not have family rooms. Units have no covered entry. inadequate storage, and no
separate laundry rooms. Kitchens are undersized and galley shaped with old cabinets and badly worn countertops and
sinks. Flooring throughout the house is outdated.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED: Major morale problems bvill result if this replacement initiative is not supported. The
housing will continue to be occupied until it becomes uninhabitable because adequate, affordable off-base housing is
not available. The current Housing Market Analysis states a proJected housing deficit of 1,492 units. If units are not
replaced, costly piecemeal repairs will continue with no Improvement in the living quality.
ADDITIONAL: This project meets the criteria/scope specified in Part II of the Military Handbook 1190,
“Facility Planning and Design Guide”. An economic analysis has been prepared comparing the alternatives of new
:onstruction, acquisition. and status quo operation. Based on the net present values and benefit of this respective
alternative, new construction was found to be most cost effective over the life of the project. The cost to improve this
lousing is approximately 85% of the replacement cost. Since this IS replacement housing, there will be no increase in
.he student population or impact on the ability of the local school district to support base dependents. This project is
lot eligible for NATO funding. SIOH is 4% to fund United Kmgdom execution agent. Base Civil Engineer: Lt Co1
Thomas D. Quasney 44 1638 522 100.
:OREIGN CURRENCY: FCF Budget Rate Used: Brltlsh PoundUS S 0.6517
ID FORM 1391c; DEC 76
PAGE NO
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
412
1. COMPONENT
AIR FORCE
2. DATE
FY 2004 MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
RAF LAKENHEATH, UNITED KINGDOM
5. PROJECT NUMBER
4. PROJECT TITLE
MSET04-4024
REPLACE MILITARY FAMILY HOUSING
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
a. Estimated Design Data:
Design/Bid/Build
(1) Status:
( a ) Date Design Started
( b ) Parametric Cost Estimate used to develop costs
( c ) Percent Complete as of Jan 2002
( d ) Date 35% Designed
( e ) Date Design Complete
( f ) Energy Study/Life-Cycle analysis was performed;
(2) Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design (b) Where design was most recently used (3) Total Cost ( c ) = ( a ) + ( b ) or ( d ) + ( e ):
( a ) Production of Plans and Specifications
( b ) All other Design Costs
( c ) Total
( d ) Contract
( e ) In-house
02 Jul31
N
3.5
02 Dee 20
03 May 30
NO
N/A
($1,ow
1,060
0
1,060
1,060
(4) Construction Start
04 Mar
(5) Construction Completion
05 Aug
). Equipment associated with this project will be provided from other appropriations: N/A
PAGE NO
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
413
RAF LAKENHEATH
UNITED KINGDOM
19
3
107
129
la
3
107
128
977
597
3,502
5.076
972
600
3,522
5,094
664
473
2,417
3,554
679
488
2435
3,602
412
323
1,618
2,353
412
323
1,616
2353
11. EFFECTIVE HOUSING REQUIREMENTS
12. HOUSING ASSETS (a + b)
a. UNDER MILITARY CONTROL
(I) HOUSED IN EXISTING DOD
(1) ACCEPTABLY HOUSED
(2) ACCEPTABLEVACANTRENTAL
5. REMARKS
Item lZ.a.(l):
566 on-base units are inadequate.