Texas Tech University
Mean Comparisons
August 2007
Interpreting the Mean Comparisons Report
Sample
The Mean Comparisons report is based on information from all randomly selected students
for both your institution and your comparison institutions. Targeted oversamples and other
non-randomly selected students are not included in this report.
Statistical Significance
Items with mean differences that are larger than would be expected by chance
alone are noted with one, two, or three asterisks, referring to three significance
levels (p<.05, p< .01, and p<.001). The smaller the significance level, the
smaller the likelihood that the difference is due to chance. Statistical
significance does not guarantee the result is substantive or important. Large
sample sizes (like those produced by NSSE) tend to generate more statistically
significant results even though the magnitude of mean differences may be
inconsequential. It is recommended to consult effect sizes (see below) to
judge the practical meaning of the results.
Variables
The items from the NSSE survey appear in the left column in the same order and wording as
they appear on the instrument. The name of each variable appears in the second column for
easy reference to your data file and the summary statistics at the end of this section. Response
options are also provided to help you interpret the statistics.
Benchmark
Items that comprise the five “Benchmarks of Effective
Educational Practice” are indicated by the following:
LAC=Level of Academic
Challenge
ACL=Active and
Collaborative Learning
SFI=Student-Faculty
Interaction
EEE=Enriching Educational 1. Academic and Intellectual Experiences
Asked questions in class or contributed to class
Experiences
a.
discussions
SCE=Supportive Campus
b. Made a class presentation
Environment
c.
Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or
assignment before turning it in
Variable
Benchmark
CLQUEST
ACL
CLPRESEN
ACL
Effect
Class
FY
SR
FY
SR
REWROPAP
Mean
Worked on a paper or project that required
The mean is the weighted
d. integrating ideas or information from
INTEGRAT
various sources
arithmetic average of student
diverse perspectives (different races,
responses on a particular item. e. Included
DIVCLASS
religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.) in class
discussions or writing assignments
Means are provided for your
to class without completing readings or
CLUNPREP
institution and all comparison f. Come
assignments
groups. For more information
about weighting go to:
www.nsse.iub.edu/2007_Institutional_Report/NSSE_2007_Weighting.cfm
Class
Results are reported separately for first-year students (FY) and seniors (SR).
Institution-reported class ranks are used.
Effect Size
Effect size indicates the
“practical significance” of
NSSE 2007 Mean Comparisons
the mean difference. It is
NSSEville State University
calculated by dividing the
NSSEville State compared with:
mean difference by the
NSSE 2007
NSSEville State
Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
standard deviation of the
In your experience at your institution during the current school year, about how often have you done each of
group with which the
the following? 1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=very often
institution is being
2.94
2.76 *** .22
2.88
.07
2.78 *** .19
3.28
3.08 *** .24
3.20
.10
3.06 *** .26
compared. In practice, an
2.27
2.24
.04
2.34
-.09
2.23
.05
effect size of .2 is often
2.82
2.77
.07
2.87
-.06
2.80
.03
considered small, .5
2.85
2.61 *** .25
2.77
.09
2.65 *** .21
2.45
2.43
.02
2.58
*
-.14
2.49
-.04
moderate, and .8 large. A
positive sign indicates that
3.13
3.01
**
.15
3.05
.11
3.03
*
.13
3.26
3.31
-.07
3.32
-.08
3.30
-.05
your institution's mean was
2.76
2.75
.01
2.71
.06
2.76
.00
greater, thus showing an
2.88
2.83
.06
2.78
.12
2.78
.11
affirmative result for your
1.86
2.07 *** -.28
1.93
-.10
2.03 *** -.23
institution. A negative sign
1.89
2.14 *** -.32
1.98
-.12
2.12 *** -.30
indicates the institution
lags behind the comparison group, suggesting that the student behavior or institutional
practice represented by the item may warrant attention. An exception to this interpretation
is the “coming to class unprepared” item (item 1f.) where a negative sign is preferred (i.e.,
meaning fewer students reporting coming to class unprepared).
FY
SR
FY
SR
FY
SR
FY
SR
Mean
a
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
NSSE 2007 Mean Comparisons
Texas Tech University
Texas Tech compared with:
Texas Tech
Variable
1.
Benchmark
b.
Class
CLQUEST
Made a class presentation
CLPRESEN
Worked on a paper or project that required
d. integrating ideas or information from
various sources
Included diverse perspectives (different races,
e. religions, genders, political beliefs, etc.) in class
discussions or writing assignments
f.
g.
DIVCLASS
CLUNPREP
Worked with other students on projects during
class
CLASSGRP
Worked with classmates outside of class to
prepare class assignments
OCCGRP
i.
Put together ideas or concepts from different
courses when completing assignments or during
class discussions
INTIDEAS
Participated in a community-based project (e.g.
service learning) as part of a regular course
k.
ACL
INTEGRAT
Come to class without completing readings or
assignments
Tutored or taught other students
(paid or voluntary)
ACL
REWROPAP
h.
j.
Mean
a
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
NSSE 2007
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
TUTOR
COMMPROJ
ACL
ACL
ACL
ACL
FY
2.53
2.56
-.03
2.67
*
-.17
2.75
***
-.25
SR
2.87
2.92
-.06
2.98
*
-.13
3.04
***
-.20
FY
1.93
2.08
-.18
2.11
**
-.23
2.21
***
-.35
SR
2.71
2.70
.02
2.70
.01
2.77
FY
2.29
2.56
***
-.27
2.64
***
-.35
2.64
***
-.36
SR
2.33
2.53
***
-.21
2.46
*
-.13
2.47
**
-.15
FY
2.90
2.93
-.03
3.02
*
-.14
3.03
*
-.16
SR
3.18
3.24
-.07
3.27
*
-.11
3.30
**
-.15
FY
2.60
2.69
-.11
2.75
**
-.18
2.76
**
-.18
SR
2.64
2.78
-.14
2.75
-.11
2.80
**
-.17
FY
2.21
2.11
.13
2.06
*
.19
2.02
**
.24
SR
2.31
2.15
.19
2.14
***
.22
2.11
***
.25
FY
2.28
2.35
-.07
2.40
-.14
2.40
SR
2.42
2.52
-.10
2.50
-.09
2.52
FY
2.43
2.40
.04
2.36
.08
2.38
SR
2.93
2.78
.17
2.78
***
.17
2.75
***
.21
FY
2.46
2.51
-.07
2.57
*
-.14
2.57
*
-.14
SR
2.90
2.90
.01
2.91
-.01
2.90
.00
FY
1.78
1.75
.04
1.71
.08
1.69
.11
SR
1.94
1.92
.02
1.89
.05
1.88
.06
FY
1.52
1.47
.06
1.53
-.02
1.52
.00
SR
1.63
1.67
-.04
1.66
-.03
1.69
-.07
*
*
***
***
-.06
-.14
*
-.11
.06
a
Weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
* p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed).
c
Mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation.
c
In your experience at your institution during the current school year, about how often have you done each of
the following? 1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=very often
Asked questions in class or contributed to class
discussions
Prepared two or more drafts of a paper or
assignment before turning it in
c.
Carnegie Peers
Effect
Academic and Intellectual Experiences
a.
Selected Peers
b
3
NSSE 2007 Mean Comparisons
Texas Tech University
Texas Tech compared with:
Texas Tech
Used an electronic medium (listserv, chat group,
Internet, instant messaging, etc.) to discuss or
complete an assignment
l.
Used e-mail to communicate with an instructor
m.
Discussed grades or assignments with an instructor
n.
o.
p.
q.
v.
ITACADEM
EEE
FY
2.67
2.58
SR
2.62
2.87
FY
2.91
2.92
SR
3.39
3.24
FY
2.52
SR
FACGRADE
FACPLANS
Discussed ideas from your readings or classes
with faculty members outside of class
FACIDEAS
Received prompt written or oral feedback from
faculty on your academic performance
FACFEED
Worked with faculty members on activities other
s. than coursework (committees, orientation, student
life activities, etc.)
Discussed ideas from your readings or classes with
t. others outside of class (students, family members,
co-workers, etc.)
u.
Class
EMAIL
WORKHARD
FACOTHER
OOCIDEAS
Had serious conversations with students of a
different race or ethnicity than your own
DIVRSTUD
Had serious conversations with students who are
very different from you in terms of their religious
beliefs, political opinions, or personal values
DIFFSTU2
SFI
SFI
SFI
SFI
LAC
SFI
ACL
EEE
EEE
Carnegie Peers
Effect
Variable
Talked about career plans with a faculty member
or advisor
Worked harder than you thought you could to meet
an instructor's standards or expectations
r.
Selected Peers
Benchmark
Mean
a
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
NSSE 2007
Effect
Mean
a
.08
2.62
-.25
2.83
-.01
3.10
.19
2.50
2.84
FY
Sig
b
Size
c
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
.05
2.61
***
-.21
2.83
***
-.21
**
-.23
3.06
**
-.18
3.33
.08
3.33
.08
.02
2.56
-.04
2.57
-.05
2.75
.10
2.78
.07
2.79
.06
2.09
2.11
-.03
2.09
-.01
2.14
-.06
SR
2.41
2.32
.09
2.35
.06
2.39
.02
FY
1.76
1.79
-.03
1.80
-.04
1.84
-.08
SR
2.08
2.04
.04
2.04
.04
2.08
.00
FY
2.41
2.47
-.07
2.57
-.19
2.59
SR
2.68
2.70
-.04
2.74
-.08
2.76
-.10
FY
2.57
2.56
.01
2.57
.00
2.60
-.03
SR
2.60
2.70
-.12
2.66
-.07
2.69
FY
1.65
1.55
.13
1.56
.12
1.59
.08
SR
1.85
1.74
*
.13
1.78
.08
1.81
.05
FY
2.47
2.64
**
-.20
2.64
-.20
2.66
SR
2.77
2.84
-.08
2.83
-.07
2.83
-.07
FY
2.62
2.61
.01
2.59
.02
2.56
.05
SR
2.65
2.75
-.10
2.68
-.03
2.66
-.01
FY
2.53
2.68
-.15
2.70
-.18
2.68
SR
2.79
2.73
.06
2.71
.09
2.71
***
***
*
*
**
**
*
.06
**
-.21
*
-.11
**
-.22
*
-.16
.08
a
Weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
* p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed).
c
Mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation.
c
b
4
NSSE 2007 Mean Comparisons
Texas Tech University
Texas Tech compared with:
Texas Tech
Variable
2.
Mental Activities
Memorizing facts, ideas, or methods from your
a. courses and readings so you can repeat them in
pretty much the same form
Analyzing the basic elements of an idea,
experience, or theory, such as examining a
b.
particular case or situation in depth and considering
its components
Synthesizing and organizing ideas, information, or
c. experiences into new, more complex interpretations
and relationships
Making judgments about the value of
information, arguments, or methods, such as
d.
examining how others gathered and interpreted
data and assessing the soundness of their
Applying theories or concepts to practical
problems or in new situations
e.
3.
Benchmark
b.
c.
d.
e.
Carnegie Peers
Effect
Class
Mean
a
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
NSSE 2007
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
MEMORIZE
ANALYZE
SYNTHESZ
EVALUATE
APPLYING
LAC
LAC
LAC
LAC
FY
2.91
2.88
.03
2.92
-.01
2.88
.04
SR
2.81
2.77
.05
2.77
.04
2.75
.07
FY
2.94
3.01
-.10
3.07
-.18
3.07
SR
3.24
3.19
.07
3.22
.02
3.23
.02
FY
2.82
2.79
.03
2.84
-.03
2.85
-.04
SR
2.97
3.00
-.03
3.01
-.04
3.03
-.07
FY
2.81
2.81
.00
2.83
-.02
2.84
-.04
SR
2.94
2.94
.00
2.94
.01
2.97
-.03
FY
2.96
2.95
.01
3.01
-.06
3.01
-.05
3.19
3.15
.05
3.18
.01
3.18
.01
SR
*
*
-.17
During the current school year, about how much reading and writing have you done?
1=none, 2=1-4, 3=5-10, 4=11-20, 5=more than 20
Number of assigned textbooks, books, or
book-length packs of course readings
READASGN
Number of books read on your own (not assigned)
for personal enjoyment or academic enrichment
READOWN
Number of written papers or reports of 20 pages or
more
WRITEMOR
Number of written papers or reports between 5
and 19 pages
WRITEMID
Number of written papers or reports of fewer than
5 pages
WRITESML
LAC
LAC
LAC
LAC
FY
2.84
3.05
SR
3.05
3.01
FY
1.80
2.00
SR
2.09
FY
**
-.24
3.19
.04
3.09
-.39
3.20
-.04
3.13
-.23
2.02
-.25
2.02
2.18
-.09
2.17
-.09
2.17
-.09
1.22
1.23
-.03
1.22
-.01
1.24
-.04
SR
1.55
1.59
-.05
1.59
-.07
1.62
-.10
FY
1.84
2.04
-.25
2.29
***
-.55
2.26
***
-.51
SR
2.36
2.37
-.02
2.50
**
-.15
2.55
***
-.21
FY
3.06
2.75
***
.31
3.02
.04
3.02
.04
SR
2.95
2.81
*
.13
2.94
.02
2.96
-.01
**
***
***
***
***
-.40
-.08
***
-.25
a
Weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
b
* p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed).
c
Mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation.
c
During the current school year, how much has your coursework emphasized the following mental activities?
1=very little, 2=some, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much
Reading and Writing
a.
Selected Peers
5
NSSE 2007 Mean Comparisons
Texas Tech University
Texas Tech compared with:
Texas Tech
Variable
4.
b.
6.
b.
PROBSETA
Number of problem sets that take you less than an
hour to complete
PROBSETB
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
Mean
a
Sig
b
c
Effect
a
Sig
.15
2.64
*
Size
Mean
b
Size
2.68
.10
2.62
SR
2.64
2.66
-.02
2.60
.03
2.58
.05
FY
2.87
2.62
.21
2.73
.12
2.72
.13
2.31
2.30
.01
2.33
-.02
2.32
-.01
SR
**
*
.14
5.40
5.40
.00
5.42
-.02
5.42
-.01
5.31
5.43
-.09
5.40
-.07
5.40
-.07
During the current school year, about how often have you done each of the following?
1=never, 2=sometimes, 3=often, 4=very often
Exercised or participated in physical fitness
activities
EXRCSE05
WORSHP05
Examined the strengths and weaknesses of your
d.
own views on a topic or issue
OWNVIEW
OTHRVIEW
FY
2.19
2.13
.06
2.20
-.01
2.19
.00
SR
2.02
2.01
.02
2.06
-.04
2.07
-.05
FY
3.01
2.73
***
.27
2.80
**
.21
2.77
***
.24
SR
2.84
2.54
***
.29
2.70
*
.14
2.66
**
.18
FY
2.37
2.06
***
.28
2.11
**
.23
2.06
***
.28
SR
2.26
2.17
.08
2.25
.01
2.14
*
.11
FY
2.59
2.54
.05
2.56
.03
2.56
.03
SR
2.73
2.67
.06
2.69
.04
2.68
.06
FY
2.67
2.72
-.06
2.72
-.06
2.72
-.06
SR
2.83
2.80
2.81
2.80
2.77
2.84
.03
.04
-.04
2.81
2.79
2.87
.03
.02
-.07
2.82
2.79
2.86
.02
.01
-.06
FY
CHNGVIEW
SR
Which of the following have you done or do you plan to do before you graduate from your institution?
(Recoded: 0=have not decided, do not plan to do, plan to do; 1=done. Thus, the mean is the proportion
responding "done" among all valid respondents.)
Enriching Educational Experiences
INTERN04
EEE
FY
.07
.08
-.04
.07
.01
.07
-.01
SR
.50
.46
.07
.52
-.04
.53
-.06
a
Weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
b
* p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed).
c
Mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation.
c
2.79
FY
EXAMS
ATDART07
Practicum, internship, field experience, co-op
experience, or clinical assignment
a
1=very little to 7=very much
Participated in activities to enhance your
c.
spirituality (worship, meditation, prayer, etc.)
a.
Mean
NSSE 2007
Effect
FY
SR
Attended an art exhibit, play, dance, music, theatre
or other performance
Tried to better understand someone else's views by
e. imagining how an issue looks from his or her
perspective
Learned something that changed the way you
f.
understand an issue or concept
7.
Class
Additional Collegiate Experiences
a.
Carnegie Peers
In a typical week, how many homework problem sets do you complete?
1=none, 2=1-2, 3=3-4, 4=5-6, 5=more than 6
Number of problem sets that take you more than an
hour to complete
Examinations
Mark the box that best represents the extent to
which your examinations during the current school
year challenged you to do your best work.
Selected Peers
Effect
Problem Sets
a.
5.
Benchmark
6
NSSE 2007 Mean Comparisons
Texas Tech University
Texas Tech compared with:
Texas Tech
Community service or volunteer work
b.
VOLNTR04
EEE
Participate in a learning community or some other
c. formal program where groups of students take two
or more classes together
LRNCOM04
Work on a research project with a faculty member
outside of course or program requirements
RESRCH04
Foreign language coursework
FORLNG04
d.
e.
Study abroad
f.
Independent study or self-designed major
g.
Culminating senior experience (capstone course,
senior project or thesis, comprehensive exam, etc.)
h.
8.
Variable
Benchmark
STDABR04
INDSTD04
SNRX04
EEE
SFI
EEE
EEE
EEE
EEE
Relationships with other students
Carnegie Peers
Effect
a
Class
Mean
FY
.40
.39
Mean
SR
.63
.57
FY
.18
SR
a
Sig
b
Size
c
NSSE 2007
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
.02
.39
.02
.38
.04
.14
.60
.08
.59
.09
.21
-.08
.18
.00
.17
.02
.26
.25
.03
.25
.03
.25
.02
FY
.07
.06
.05
.05
.12
.05
.11
SR
.20
.17
.10
.19
.03
.19
.03
FY
.16
.19
-.08
.23
-.16
.22
*
-.15
SR
.47
.37
.19
.43
.08
.41
*
.12
FY
.02
.03
-.04
.02
-.01
.03
-.03
SR
.11
.11
.03
.14
-.08
.14
-.08
FY
.02
.04
-.10
.03
-.06
.03
-.06
SR
.20
.14
.15
.17
.08
.17
.05
FY
.02
.02
.04
.02
.04
.02
.05
.28
.25
.09
.33
-.10
.32
-.08
SR
*
**
*
*
Mark the box that best represents the quality of your relationships with people at your institution.
1=unfriendly, unsupportive, sense of alienation to 7=friendly, supportive, sense of belonging
Quality of Relationships
a.
Selected Peers
ENVSTU
SCE
FY
SR
5.50
5.45
.03
5.51
-.01
5.53
-.02
5.66
5.58
.06
5.61
.04
5.62
.03
1=unavailable, unhelpful, unsympathetic to 7=available, helpful, sympathetic
Relationships with faculty members
b.
ENVFAC
SCE
FY
4.90
5.08
-.14
5.10
-.15
5.19
**
-.22
SR
5.21
5.31
-.08
5.35
-.10
5.41
**
-.15
1=unhelpful, inconsiderate, rigid to 7=helpful, considerate, flexible
Relationships with administrative personnel and
offices
c.
ENVADM
SCE
FY
4.57
4.60
-.02
4.56
.00
4.64
-.04
SR
4.36
4.54
-.10
4.47
-.06
4.54
-.10
a
Weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
* p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed).
c
Mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation.
b
7
NSSE 2007 Mean Comparisons
Texas Tech University
Texas Tech compared with:
Texas Tech
Variable
9.
Time Usage
Preparing for class (studying, reading, writing,
a. doing homework or lab work, analyzing data,
rehearsing, and other academic activities)
Working for pay on campus
b.
Working for pay off campus
c.
Participating in co-curricular activities
(organizations, campus publications, student
d.
government, fraternity or sorority, intercollegiate
or intramural sports, etc.)
e.
f.
g.
Benchmark
Class
b.
c.
Mean
a
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
NSSE 2007
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
ACADPR01
LAC
WORKON01
WORKOF01
COCURR01
Relaxing and socializing (watching TV,
partying, etc.)
SOCIAL05
Providing care for dependents living with you
(parents, children, spouse, etc.)
CAREDE01
Commuting to class (driving, walking, etc.)
COMMUTE
EEE
FY
3.72
3.95
-.14
4.00
*
-.18
4.01
*
-.18
SR
3.89
4.11
*
-.12
4.09
*
-.12
4.10
*
-.12
FY
1.79
1.54
*
.18
1.57
.17
1.57
.18
SR
1.96
1.83
.07
1.89
.04
1.84
.07
FY
1.96
2.52
***
-.24
2.19
-.11
2.41
SR
3.50
3.92
*
-.15
3.62
-.04
3.79
FY
2.51
2.25
*
.17
2.29
.14
2.24
SR
2.23
1.95
***
.20
2.04
.13
2.07
.11
FY
3.79
3.66
.08
3.87
-.05
3.78
.00
SR
3.67
3.38
***
.19
3.51
.11
3.49
*
.12
FY
1.30
1.73
***
-.27
1.54
***
-.18
1.72
***
-.26
SR
2.05
2.80
***
-.29
2.31
*
-.12
2.39
**
-.15
FY
2.27
2.40
-.12
2.26
.01
2.25
.02
2.33
2.50
-.16
2.36
-.03
2.38
-.06
***
*
**
-.20
-.10
*
.18
To what extent does your institution emphasize each of the following?
1=very little, 2=some, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much
Spending significant amounts of time studying and
on academic work
ENVSCHOL
Providing the support you need to help you
succeed academically
ENVSUPRT
Encouraging contact among students from different
economic, social, and racial or ethnic backgrounds
ENVDIVRS
LAC
SCE
EEE
FY
2.97
3.07
-.12
3.07
-.13
3.09
SR
3.03
3.04
-.01
3.07
-.05
3.08
-.07
FY
2.90
2.98
-.09
2.97
-.09
3.02
-.14
SR
2.78
2.82
-.06
2.83
-.07
2.87
-.11
FY
2.61
2.60
.01
2.58
.03
2.63
-.01
SR
2.28
2.46
-.18
2.41
-.13
2.44
**
*
*
-.15
**
-.16
a
Weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
* p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed).
c
Mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation.
c
About how many hours do you spend in a typical 7-day week doing each of the following?
1=0 hrs/wk, 2=1-5 hrs/wk, 3=6-10 hrs/wk, 4=11-15 hrs/wk, 5=16-20 hrs/wk, 6=21-25 hrs/wk, 7=26-30 hrs/wk,
8=more than 30 hrs/wk
Institutional Environment
a.
Carnegie Peers
Effect
SR
10.
Selected Peers
b
8
NSSE 2007 Mean Comparisons
Texas Tech University
Texas Tech compared with:
Texas Tech
d.
e.
f.
g.
Variable
Benchmark
Helping you cope with your non-academic
responsibilities (work, family, etc.)
ENVNACAD
SCE
Providing the support you need to thrive socially
ENVSOCAL
Attending campus events and activities (special
speakers, cultural performances, athletic
events, etc.)
ENVEVENT
Using computers in academic work
ENVCOMPT
SCE
Class
Acquiring a broad general education
b.
c.
GNWRITE
Using computing and information technology
g.
Working effectively with others
h.
GNGENLED
Writing clearly and effectively
Analyzing quantitative problems
f.
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
2.14
.00
2.13
.01
2.16
-.02
SR
1.83
1.89
-.07
1.89
-.07
1.91
-.09
FY
2.50
2.40
.11
2.41
.10
2.41
.10
SR
2.16
2.16
.00
2.18
-.02
2.17
-.01
FY
2.85
2.62
3.20
3.40
2.76
2.54
3.30
3.48
.10
.09
-.12
-.10
2.83
2.62
3.32
3.48
.03
.01
-.15
-.11
2.79
2.58
3.32
3.47
.07
.05
-.15
-.09
FY
*
*
GNSPEAK
GNANALY
GNQUANT
GNCMPTS
GNOTHERS
FY
3.09
3.07
.03
3.11
-.03
3.13
-.04
SR
3.16
3.21
-.06
3.23
-.09
3.24
-.09
FY
2.83
2.68
.16
2.72
.12
2.73
.11
SR
2.98
3.00
-.02
3.03
-.05
3.02
-.05
FY
2.87
2.83
.04
2.92
-.05
2.95
-.10
SR
2.90
3.01
-.12
3.04
-.16
3.06
FY
2.67
2.68
-.01
2.68
-.01
2.76
-.10
SR
2.85
2.91
-.06
2.93
-.08
2.95
-.11
FY
3.03
3.14
-.13
3.15
-.15
3.17
SR
3.25
3.31
-.07
3.32
-.09
3.33
-.10
FY
2.90
2.90
.00
2.88
.03
2.89
.01
SR
3.09
3.04
.05
3.05
.04
3.04
.05
FY
3.04
3.01
.03
3.00
.05
3.01
.04
SR
3.19
3.23
-.05
3.21
-.03
3.20
-.01
FY
2.94
2.88
.07
2.89
.05
2.93
.01
SR
3.12
3.07
.06
3.11
.02
3.12
.00
*
*
**
***
-.19
*
-.18
a
Weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
* p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed).
c
Mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation.
c
To what extent has your experience at this institution contributed to your knowledge, skills, and personal
development in the following areas?
1=very little, 2=some, 3=quite a bit, 4=very much
GNWORK
Thinking critically and analytically
e.
a
2.14
SR
Acquiring job or work-related knowledge
and skills
Speaking clearly and effectively
d.
Mean
NSSE 2007
Effect
FY
Educational and Personal Growth
a.
Carnegie Peers
Effect
SR
11.
Selected Peers
b
9
NSSE 2007 Mean Comparisons
Texas Tech University
Texas Tech compared with:
Texas Tech
Variable
Voting in local, state, or national elections
i.
Learning effectively on your own
j.
Understanding yourself
k.
l.
m.
12.
13.
Solving complex real-world problems
GNPROBSV
Developing a deepened sense of spirituality
p.
GNSELF
GNDIVERS
Contributing to the welfare of your community
o.
GNINQ
Understanding people of other racial and ethnic
backgrounds
Developing a personal code of values and ethics
n.
GNCITIZN
Academic Advising
Overall, how would you evaluate the quality of
academic advising you have received at your
institution?
GNETHICS
GNCOMMUN
GNSPIRIT
Benchmark
Carnegie Peers
Effect
Class
Mean
a
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
NSSE 2007
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
*
FY
2.19
2.19
.00
2.02
SR
2.11
2.14
-.03
FY
2.85
2.89
SR
2.97
FY
b
Size
c
Effect
Mean
a
Sig
b
Size
c
.16
2.05
.13
2.02
.09
2.06
.06
-.04
2.86
-.01
2.88
-.04
2.98
-.02
2.99
-.02
3.00
-.04
2.69
2.71
-.02
2.70
-.01
2.73
-.04
SR
2.77
2.73
.03
2.74
.02
2.78
-.01
FY
2.58
2.61
-.03
2.56
.02
2.61
-.03
SR
2.40
2.62
-.23
2.55
-.15
2.59
FY
2.59
2.62
-.04
2.59
-.01
2.62
-.04
SR
2.75
2.74
.02
2.74
.01
2.74
.02
FY
2.65
2.59
.06
2.60
.05
2.62
.04
SR
2.63
2.63
.00
2.66
-.02
2.66
-.02
FY
2.42
2.34
.07
2.38
.04
2.39
.03
SR
2.31
2.39
-.08
2.42
*
-.11
2.43
*
-.12
FY
2.23
2.03
.19
2.07
*
.15
2.08
*
.15
SR
1.75
1.85
-.10
1.95
***
-.18
1.92
**
-.15
*
.13
2.98
.07
***
*
**
***
-.20
1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=excellent
ADVISE
FY
3.03
2.95
.09
2.92
SR
2.74
2.81
-.08
2.77
-.04
2.84
-.11
Satisfaction
How would you evaluate your entire educational
experience at this institution?
Selected Peers
1=poor, 2=fair, 3=good, 4=excellent
ENTIREXP
FY
SR
14.
3.21
3.14
.09
3.16
.06
3.18
.04
3.21
3.15
.07
3.18
.04
3.20
.01
.14
1=definitely no, 2=probably no, 3=probably yes, 4=definitely yes
If you could start over again, would you go to the
same institution you are now attending?
SAMECOLL
FY
3.33
3.22
.14
3.22
.14
3.22
SR
3.26
3.17
.10
3.18
.09
3.19
.08
IPEDS: 229115
a
Weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
* p<.05 ** p<.01 *** p<.001 (2-tailed).
c
Mean difference divided by comparison group standard deviation.
b
10
NSSE 2007 Detailed Statistics a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Standard Error of the Mean b
NSSE 2007
Texas Tech
Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
Selected
Peers
Carnegie
Peers
NSSE 2007
230
2.53
2.56
2.67
2.75
.06
.01
.01
.00
.87
.84
.83
.84
3,614
5,832
31,068
.658
.013
.000
-.03
-.17
-.25
CLPRESEN
230
1.93
2.08
2.11
2.21
.06
.01
.01
.00
.88
.81
.78
.80
256
244
31,065
.015
.002
.000
-.18
-.23
-.35
REWROPAP
230
2.29
2.56
2.64
2.64
.07
.02
.01
.01
1.02
1.02
.99
.98
3,611
5,828
31,049
.000
.000
.000
-.27
-.35
-.36
INTEGRAT
229
2.90
2.93
3.02
3.03
.05
.01
.01
.00
.82
.85
.80
.80
3,610
5,826
31,042
.611
.033
.015
-.03
-.14
-.16
DIVCLASS
229
2.60
2.69
2.75
2.76
.06
.02
.01
.01
.87
.91
.87
.88
3,609
5,826
31,023
.119
.008
.006
-.11
-.18
-.18
CLUNPREP
229
2.21
2.11
2.06
2.02
.06
.01
.01
.00
.85
.78
.76
.76
255
243
231
.082
.012
.001
.13
.19
.24
CLASSGRP
229
2.28
2.35
2.40
2.40
.06
.02
.01
.00
.93
.87
.82
.83
3,608
243
231
.277
.071
.055
-.07
-.14
-.14
OCCGRP
229
2.43
2.40
2.36
2.38
.06
.02
.01
.00
.93
.91
.88
.87
3,612
5,827
31,046
.589
.234
.337
.04
.08
.06
INTIDEAS
215
2.46
2.51
2.57
2.57
.06
.01
.01
.00
.81
.82
.81
.81
3,381
5,483
29,329
.314
.049
.039
-.07
-.14
-.14
TUTOR
215
1.78
1.75
1.71
1.69
.06
.02
.01
.00
.89
.86
.84
.84
3,382
5,485
29,334
.549
.239
.113
.04
.08
.11
COMMPROJ
215
1.52
1.47
1.53
1.52
.05
.01
.01
.00
.77
.78
.81
.80
3,380
5,482
29,321
.362
.798
.971
.06
-.02
.00
ITACADEM
214
2.67
2.58
2.62
2.61
.07
.02
.01
.01
1.06
1.05
1.03
1.03
3,380
5,483
29,329
.230
.484
.408
.08
.05
.06
EMAIL
215
2.91
2.92
3.10
3.06
.06
.02
.01
.00
.84
.87
.82
.84
3,379
5,482
29,327
.912
.001
.008
-.01
-.23
-.18
FACGRADE
215
2.52
2.50
2.56
2.57
.06
.02
.01
.01
.88
.87
.87
.87
3,382
5,483
29,326
.767
.566
.427
.02
-.04
-.05
FACPLANS
215
2.09
2.11
2.09
2.14
.06
.02
.01
.01
.92
.89
.88
.88
3,381
5,480
29,328
.645
.934
.376
-.03
-.01
-.06
FACIDEAS
215
1.76
1.79
1.80
1.84
.06
.02
.01
.01
.90
.87
.86
.87
3,381
5,483
29,325
.661
.519
.215
-.03
-.04
-.08
FACFEED
207
2.41
2.47
2.57
2.59
.06
.02
.01
.00
.81
.86
.82
.83
3,315
5,366
28,758
.336
.007
.003
-.07
-.19
-.21
WORKHARD
206
2.57
2.56
2.57
2.60
.06
.02
.01
.00
.87
.85
.84
.84
3,311
5,365
28,754
.875
.954
.650
.01
.00
-.03
Carnegie
Peers
NSSE 2007
Carnegie Peers
CLQUEST
Selected
Peers
Selected Peers
Texas Tech
compared with:
Texas Tech
Effect Size f
Texas Tech
compared with:
NSSE 2007
Significance e
Carnegie Peers
Degrees of Freedom d
Selected Peers
Standard Deviation c
Texas Tech
Mean
Texas Tech
N
FACOTHER
207
1.65
1.55
1.56
1.59
.06
.01
.01
.00
.90
.81
.80
.82
229
220
28,748
.105
.139
.248
.13
.12
.08
OOCIDEAS
207
2.47
2.64
2.64
2.66
.06
.02
.01
.01
.90
.90
.87
.87
3,311
5,366
28,740
.007
.005
.002
-.20
-.20
-.22
DIVRSTUD
207
2.62
2.61
2.59
2.56
.07
.02
.01
.01
1.03
1.03
1.01
1.01
3,311
5,366
28,740
.910
.745
.458
.01
.02
.05
DIFFSTU2
207
2.53
2.68
2.70
2.68
.07
.02
.01
.01
1.04
.99
.97
.98
3,312
221
28,736
.034
.019
.026
-.15
-.18
-.16
MEMORIZE
205
2.91
2.88
2.92
2.88
.06
.02
.01
.01
.86
.86
.85
.86
3,274
5,316
28,501
.674
.927
.579
.03
-.01
.04
ANALYZE
205
2.94
3.01
3.07
3.07
.06
.01
.01
.00
.83
.80
.78
.78
3,273
5,313
28,485
.176
.014
.013
-.10
-.18
-.17
SYNTHESZ
205
2.82
2.79
2.84
2.85
.06
.02
.01
.00
.82
.85
.84
.84
3,274
5,312
28,476
.655
.642
.586
.03
-.03
-.04
EVALUATE
205
2.81
2.81
2.83
2.84
.06
.02
.01
.01
.92
.88
.87
.86
3,272
5,312
28,478
.968
.765
.567
.00
-.02
-.04
APPLYING
205
2.96
2.95
3.01
3.01
.06
.02
.01
.01
.88
.86
.86
.85
3,274
5,314
28,485
.892
.391
.455
.01
-.06
-.05
READASGN
204
2.84
3.05
3.19
3.20
.06
.02
.01
.01
.91
.87
.90
.92
228
5,289
28,388
.002
.000
.000
-.24
-.39
-.40
a
All statistics are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
b
The 95% confidence interval for the population mean is equal to the sample mean plus/minus the product of 1.96 times the standard error of the mean.
c
A measure of the average amount individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution.
d
Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values differ from the total Ns due to weighting and the equal variances assumption.
e
Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance.
f
Effect size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the comparison group.
11
NSSE 2007 Detailed Statistics a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Standard Error of the Mean b
NSSE 2007
Texas Tech
Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
Selected
Peers
Carnegie
Peers
NSSE 2007
204
1.80
2.00
2.02
2.02
.05
.02
.01
.01
.78
.90
.89
.90
3,260
5,290
28,391
.001
.000
.000
-.23
-.25
-.25
WRITEMOR
204
1.22
1.23
1.22
1.24
.04
.01
.01
.00
.61
.61
.59
.63
3,260
5,289
28,386
.714
.867
.547
-.03
-.01
-.04
WRITEMID
204
1.84
2.04
2.29
2.26
.05
.01
.01
.00
.69
.83
.83
.83
3,259
227
207
.001
.000
.000
-.25
-.55
-.51
WRITESML
204
3.06
2.75
3.02
3.02
.08
.02
.01
.01
1.13
1.00
1.03
1.04
224
217
205
.000
.580
.615
.31
.04
.04
PROBSETA
203
2.79
2.68
2.62
2.64
.08
.02
.02
.01
1.14
1.13
1.12
1.10
3,252
5,278
28,322
.173
.035
.047
.10
.15
.14
PROBSETB
203
2.87
2.62
2.73
2.72
.09
.02
.02
.01
1.22
1.19
1.18
1.19
3,251
5,272
28,298
.004
.086
.058
.21
.12
.13
EXAMS
202
5.40
5.40
5.42
5.42
.09
.02
.02
.01
1.27
1.18
1.16
1.17
3,249
214
203
.979
.827
.876
.00
-.02
-.01
ATDART07
201
2.19
2.13
2.20
2.19
.07
.02
.01
.01
.93
.91
.92
.91
3,216
5,238
28,099
.385
.889
.977
.06
-.01
.00
EXRCSE05
201
3.01
2.73
2.80
2.77
.07
.02
.01
.01
.94
1.03
1.02
1.04
233
219
203
.000
.002
.000
.27
.21
.24
WORSHP05
201
2.37
2.06
2.11
2.06
.08
.02
.02
.01
1.16
1.10
1.13
1.10
225
5,236
202
.000
.001
.000
.28
.23
.28
OWNVIEW
201
2.59
2.54
2.56
2.56
.06
.02
.01
.01
.90
.89
.88
.88
3,211
5,236
28,082
.456
.694
.653
.05
.03
.03
OTHRVIEW
199
2.67
2.72
2.72
2.72
.06
.02
.01
.01
.88
.87
.86
.86
3,214
5,236
28,090
.421
.430
.435
-.06
-.06
-.06
CHNGVIEW
201
2.80
2.77
2.79
2.79
.06
.02
.01
.01
.80
.85
.84
.84
231
5,233
28,086
.576
.757
.866
.04
.02
.01
INTERN04
197
.07
.08
.07
.07
.02
.01
.00
.00
.26
.28
.25
.26
3,155
5,172
27,658
.545
.872
.872
-.04
.01
-.01
VOLNTR04
197
.40
.39
.39
.38
.04
.01
.01
.00
.49
.49
.49
.48
3,154
5,169
27,649
.748
.802
.539
.02
.02
.04
LRNCOM04
197
.18
.21
.18
.17
.03
.01
.01
.00
.38
.41
.38
.37
226
5,168
27,644
.234
.981
.744
-.08
.00
.02
RESRCH04
196
.07
.06
.05
.05
.02
.00
.00
.00
.26
.24
.21
.22
3,152
205
197
.529
.180
.213
.05
.12
.11
FORLNG04
197
.16
.19
.23
.22
.03
.01
.01
.00
.37
.39
.42
.42
226
216
199
.250
.014
.021
-.08
-.16
-.15
STDABR04
196
.02
.03
.02
.03
.01
.00
.00
.00
.15
.17
.15
.16
3,153
5,167
27,635
.553
.926
.654
-.04
-.01
-.03
INDSTD04
195
.02
.04
.03
.03
.01
.00
.00
.00
.15
.20
.18
.18
243
5,166
27,636
.092
.379
.394
-.10
-.06
-.06
SNRX04
196
.02
.02
.02
.02
.01
.00
.00
.00
.15
.13
.13
.12
3,153
5,165
27,636
.612
.616
.462
.04
.04
.05
ENVSTU
194
5.50
5.45
5.51
5.53
.10
.03
.02
.01
1.43
1.40
1.38
1.37
3,144
5,150
27,568
.675
.926
.764
.03
-.01
-.02
ENVFAC
194
4.90
5.08
5.10
5.19
.10
.02
.02
.01
1.43
1.35
1.32
1.32
3,145
207
27,570
.067
.056
.002
-.14
-.15
-.22
ENVADM
194
4.57
4.60
4.56
4.64
.11
.03
.02
.01
1.56
1.59
1.55
1.55
3,141
5,146
27,551
.823
.956
.534
-.02
.00
-.04
-.18
Carnegie
Peers
NSSE 2007
Carnegie Peers
READOWN
Selected
Peers
Selected Peers
Texas Tech
compared with:
Texas Tech
Effect Size f
Texas Tech
compared with:
NSSE 2007
Significance e
Carnegie Peers
Degrees of Freedom d
Selected Peers
Standard Deviation c
Texas Tech
Mean
Texas Tech
N
ACADPR01
194
3.72
3.95
4.00
4.01
.11
.03
.02
.01
1.59
1.65
1.59
1.61
3,123
5,119
27,400
.060
.016
.013
-.14
-.18
WORKON01
194
1.79
1.54
1.57
1.57
.12
.03
.02
.01
1.64
1.36
1.31
1.27
211
203
195
.039
.064
.059
.18
.17
.18
WORKOF01
194
1.96
2.52
2.19
2.41
.14
.04
.03
.01
1.96
2.34
2.07
2.27
232
211
197
.000
.113
.002
-.24
-.11
-.20
COCURR01
194
2.51
2.25
2.29
2.24
.11
.03
.02
.01
1.57
1.55
1.56
1.53
3,124
5,117
27,400
.024
.054
.015
.17
.14
.18
a
All statistics are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
b
The 95% confidence interval for the population mean is equal to the sample mean plus/minus the product of 1.96 times the standard error of the mean.
c
A measure of the average amount individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution.
d
Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values differ from the total Ns due to weighting and the equal variances assumption.
e
Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance.
f
Effect size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the comparison group.
12
NSSE 2007 Detailed Statistics a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
NSSE 2007
Selected
Peers
Carnegie
Peers
NSSE 2007
.03
.02
.01
1.69
1.65
1.67
1.67
3,113
5,108
27,348
.279
.533
.973
.08
-.05
.00
.07
.03
.02
.01
.91
1.55
1.36
1.61
275
229
202
.000
.001
.000
-.27
-.18
-.26
COMMUTE
194
2.27
2.40
2.26
2.25
.07
.02
.01
.01
1.04
1.05
.98
1.04
3,119
5,108
27,357
.112
.848
.819
-.12
.01
.02
ENVSCHOL
190
2.97
3.07
3.07
3.09
.06
.01
.01
.00
.80
.78
.75
.76
3,080
5,047
27,072
.107
.071
.035
-.12
-.13
-.15
ENVSUPRT
190
2.90
2.98
2.97
3.02
.06
.02
.01
.00
.85
.82
.80
.80
3,080
5,049
27,070
.209
.240
.056
-.09
-.09
-.14
Carnegie
Peers
NSSE 2007
Carnegie Peers
.12
1.72
Selected
Peers
Selected Peers
3.78
1.54
Selected Peers
3.87
1.73
Texas Tech
3.66
1.30
NSSE 2007
3.79
194
Selected Peers
194
CAREDE01
Texas Tech
NSSE 2007
Texas Tech
compared with:
Carnegie Peers
Effect Size f
Texas Tech
compared with:
Selected Peers
Significance e
Texas Tech
Degrees of Freedom d
NSSE 2007
Standard Deviation c
SOCIAL05
Texas Tech
Carnegie Peers
Standard Error of the Mean b
Mean
Carnegie Peers
N
ENVDIVRS
190
2.61
2.60
2.58
2.63
.07
.02
.01
.01
.99
.97
.97
.97
3,077
5,046
27,048
.846
.661
.842
.01
.03
-.01
ENVNACAD
190
2.14
2.14
2.13
2.16
.07
.02
.01
.01
.99
.95
.94
.94
3,077
5,045
27,045
.978
.889
.775
.00
.01
-.02
ENVSOCAL
190
2.50
2.40
2.41
2.41
.07
.02
.01
.01
.98
.93
.93
.92
3,078
5,045
27,036
.150
.184
.174
.11
.10
.10
ENVEVENT
190
2.85
2.76
2.83
2.79
.07
.02
.01
.01
.93
.94
.91
.93
3,078
5,048
27,052
.203
.715
.357
.10
.03
.07
ENVCOMPT
190
3.20
3.30
3.32
3.32
.06
.01
.01
.00
.84
.79
.77
.78
3,079
5,050
27,065
.099
.038
.045
-.12
-.15
-.15
GNGENLED
185
3.09
3.07
3.11
3.13
.06
.01
.01
.00
.82
.80
.77
.78
3,022
4,975
26,665
.703
.724
.587
.03
-.03
-.04
GNWORK
185
2.83
2.68
2.72
2.73
.07
.02
.01
.01
.96
.97
.95
.94
3,020
4,974
26,653
.032
.111
.149
.16
.12
.11
GNWRITE
185
2.87
2.83
2.92
2.95
.06
.02
.01
.01
.86
.90
.88
.87
3,023
4,972
26,658
.563
.471
.198
.04
-.05
-.10
GNSPEAK
185
2.67
2.68
2.68
2.76
.07
.02
.01
.01
.91
.95
.94
.92
3,022
4,972
26,657
.845
.888
.189
-.01
-.01
-.10
GNANALY
185
3.03
3.14
3.15
3.17
.06
.02
.01
.00
.84
.81
.80
.79
3,022
4,974
26,662
.087
.050
.016
-.13
-.15
-.18
GNQUANT
185
2.90
2.90
2.88
2.89
.07
.02
.01
.01
.88
.89
.88
.88
3,021
4,970
26,639
.949
.729
.918
.00
.03
.01
GNCMPTS
185
3.04
3.01
3.00
3.01
.06
.02
.01
.01
.88
.90
.91
.89
3,022
4,974
26,659
.657
.512
.607
.03
.05
.04
GNOTHERS
185
2.94
2.88
2.89
2.93
.07
.02
.01
.01
.91
.91
.90
.88
3,022
4,974
26,655
.375
.480
.862
.07
.05
.01
GNCITIZN
183
2.19
2.19
2.02
2.05
.08
.02
.01
.01
1.03
1.02
1.00
1.01
2,981
4,922
26,353
.970
.029
.071
.00
.16
.13
GNINQ
183
2.85
2.89
2.86
2.88
.06
.02
.01
.01
.83
.87
.86
.85
2,983
4,921
26,361
.617
.886
.634
-.04
-.01
-.04
GNSELF
183
2.69
2.71
2.70
2.73
.07
.02
.01
.01
.96
.98
.97
.96
2,983
4,922
26,356
.778
.878
.562
-.02
-.01
-.04
GNDIVERS
183
2.58
2.61
2.56
2.61
.07
.02
.01
.01
.95
.97
.97
.96
2,979
4,920
26,349
.695
.761
.715
-.03
.02
-.03
GNPROBSV
183
2.59
2.62
2.59
2.62
.07
.02
.01
.01
.93
.94
.93
.92
2,981
4,920
26,353
.618
.903
.619
-.04
-.01
-.04
GNETHICS
183
2.65
2.59
2.60
2.62
.07
.02
.01
.01
.94
1.01
1.00
.99
210
4,918
26,353
.370
.490
.635
.06
.05
.04
GNCOMMUN
183
2.42
2.34
2.38
2.39
.07
.02
.01
.01
.99
.99
.98
.97
2,979
4,920
26,349
.327
.612
.699
.07
.04
.03
GNSPIRIT
183
2.23
2.03
2.07
2.08
.08
.02
.02
.01
1.08
1.06
1.09
1.07
2,981
4,918
26,345
.014
.049
.049
.19
.15
.15
ADVISE
182
3.03
2.95
2.92
2.98
.06
.02
.01
.01
.77
.85
.87
.85
2,979
199
26,397
.217
.047
.358
.09
.13
.07
ENTIREXP
182
3.21
3.14
3.16
3.18
.05
.01
.01
.00
.73
.73
.73
.72
2,979
4,931
26,408
.252
.443
.626
.09
.06
.04
SAMECOLL
182
3.33
3.22
3.22
3.22
.06
.02
.01
.01
.79
.83
.83
.82
2,979
4,932
26,404
.075
.064
.069
.14
.14
.14
a
All statistics are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
b
The 95% confidence interval for the population mean is equal to the sample mean plus/minus the product of 1.96 times the standard error of the mean.
c
A measure of the average amount individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution.
d
Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values differ from the total Ns due to weighting and the equal variances assumption.
e
Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance.
f
Effect size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the comparison group.
IPEDS: 229115
13
NSSE 2007 Detailed Statistics a
Texas Tech University
Seniors
Standard Error of the Mean b
Mean
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
Texas Tech
Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
Selected
Peers
Carnegie
Peers
NSSE 2007
358
2.87
2.92
2.98
3.04
.05
.01
.01
.00
.85
.88
.86
.86
5,556
8,142
40,303
.239
.013
.000
-.06
-.13
-.20
CLPRESEN
358
2.71
2.70
2.70
2.77
.04
.01
.01
.00
.84
.90
.86
.87
415
8,140
40,294
.758
.815
.250
.02
.01
-.06
REWROPAP
357
2.33
2.53
2.46
2.47
.05
.01
.01
.00
.97
.98
.97
.98
5,552
8,138
40,281
.000
.013
.005
-.21
-.13
-.15
INTEGRAT
358
3.18
3.24
3.27
3.30
.04
.01
.01
.00
.75
.77
.75
.74
5,548
8,137
40,276
.196
.038
.005
-.07
-.11
-.15
DIVCLASS
358
2.64
2.78
2.75
2.80
.05
.01
.01
.00
.97
.94
.92
.92
5,541
387
363
.011
.052
.003
-.14
-.11
-.17
CLUNPREP
358
2.31
2.15
2.14
2.11
.04
.01
.01
.00
.84
.80
.78
.78
402
385
363
.001
.000
.000
.19
.22
.25
CLASSGRP
358
2.42
2.52
2.50
2.52
.05
.01
.01
.00
.88
.91
.88
.88
5,550
8,136
40,271
.057
.082
.039
-.10
-.09
-.11
OCCGRP
358
2.93
2.78
2.78
2.75
.05
.01
.01
.00
.87
.92
.91
.91
414
394
364
.001
.001
.000
.17
.17
.21
INTIDEAS
343
2.90
2.90
2.91
2.90
.05
.01
.01
.00
.83
.82
.80
.81
5,369
7,870
39,039
.914
.884
.980
.01
-.01
.00
TUTOR
343
1.94
1.92
1.89
1.88
.05
.01
.01
.00
1.00
.96
.95
.95
5,369
7,871
39,048
.687
.348
.260
.02
.05
.06
COMMPROJ
342
1.63
1.67
1.66
1.69
.05
.01
.01
.00
.85
.90
.88
.89
5,361
7,866
39,027
.450
.570
.221
-.04
-.03
-.07
ITACADEM
343
2.62
2.87
2.83
2.83
.06
.01
.01
.01
1.04
1.02
1.03
1.02
5,369
7,872
39,050
.000
.000
.000
-.25
-.21
-.21
EMAIL
343
3.39
3.24
3.33
3.33
.04
.01
.01
.00
.74
.80
.76
.77
5,370
7,872
39,051
.001
.148
.139
.19
.08
.08
FACGRADE
343
2.84
2.75
2.78
2.79
.05
.01
.01
.00
.83
.88
.87
.88
397
7,865
349
.067
.205
.244
.10
.07
.06
FACPLANS
343
2.41
2.32
2.35
2.39
.05
.01
.01
.00
1.01
.95
.94
.95
385
370
348
.127
.315
.777
.09
.06
.02
FACIDEAS
343
2.08
2.04
2.04
2.08
.05
.01
.01
.00
.92
.93
.90
.92
5,368
7,869
39,044
.424
.442
.970
.04
.04
.00
FACFEED
339
2.68
2.70
2.74
2.76
.05
.01
.01
.00
.84
.83
.80
.81
5,313
7,794
38,615
.526
.142
.069
-.04
-.08
-.10
WORKHARD
339
2.60
2.70
2.66
2.69
.05
.01
.01
.00
.88
.86
.85
.86
5,310
7,790
38,595
.039
.219
.046
-.12
-.07
-.11
FACOTHER
339
1.85
1.74
1.78
1.81
.05
.01
.01
.00
.95
.91
.92
.94
5,311
7,790
38,596
.025
.149
.376
.13
.08
.05
OOCIDEAS
339
2.77
2.84
2.83
2.83
.05
.01
.01
.00
.84
.87
.85
.86
5,311
7,793
38,599
.168
.194
.201
-.08
-.07
-.07
DIVRSTUD
339
2.65
2.75
2.68
2.66
.05
.01
.01
.01
1.01
.99
.98
.99
5,305
7,785
38,569
.088
.649
.921
-.10
-.03
-.01
DIFFSTU2
339
2.79
2.73
2.71
2.71
.05
.01
.01
.00
.99
.97
.96
.96
5,307
7,787
38,573
.328
.126
.138
.06
.09
.08
MEMORIZE
334
2.81
2.77
2.77
2.75
.05
.01
.01
.00
.88
.91
.91
.91
5,264
7,735
340
.410
.465
.191
.05
.04
.07
ANALYZE
334
3.24
3.19
3.22
3.23
.04
.01
.01
.00
.75
.77
.74
.75
5,261
7,733
38,328
.210
.670
.723
.07
.02
.02
SYNTHESZ
334
2.97
3.00
3.01
3.03
.05
.01
.01
.00
.86
.84
.83
.83
5,255
7,729
38,307
.624
.447
.200
-.03
-.04
-.07
Carnegie
Peers
NSSE 2007
Selected Peers
CLQUEST
Selected
Peers
Texas Tech
Texas Tech
compared with:
NSSE 2007
Effect Size f
Texas Tech
compared with:
Carnegie Peers
Significance e
Selected Peers
Degrees of Freedom d
Texas Tech
Standard Deviation c
Texas Tech
N
EVALUATE
334
2.94
2.94
2.94
2.97
.05
.01
.01
.00
.90
.88
.88
.87
5,259
7,731
38,318
.986
.915
.644
.00
.01
-.03
APPLYING
334
3.19
3.15
3.18
3.18
.05
.01
.01
.00
.85
.85
.83
.83
5,262
7,733
38,328
.410
.847
.847
.05
.01
.01
READASGN
334
3.05
3.01
3.09
3.13
.06
.01
.01
.01
1.02
.98
.98
1.00
5,245
7,715
38,192
.491
.505
.142
.04
-.04
-.08
a
All statistics are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
b
The 95% confidence interval for the population mean is equal to the sample mean plus/minus the product of 1.96 times the standard error of the mean.
c
A measure of the average amount individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution.
d
Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values differ from the total Ns due to weighting and the equal variances assumption.
e
Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance.
f
Effect size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the comparison group.
14
NSSE 2007 Detailed Statistics a
Texas Tech University
Seniors
Standard Error of the Mean b
NSSE 2007
Texas Tech
Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
Selected
Peers
Carnegie
Peers
NSSE 2007
334
2.09
2.18
2.17
2.17
.05
.01
.01
.00
1.00
.97
.96
.97
5,247
7,715
38,207
.109
.121
.110
-.09
-.09
-.09
WRITEMOR
334
1.55
1.59
1.59
1.62
.04
.01
.01
.00
.68
.79
.74
.77
397
7,714
38,195
.309
.237
.076
-.05
-.07
-.10
WRITEMID
334
2.36
2.37
2.50
2.55
.05
.01
.01
.00
.87
.92
.94
.94
5,245
369
340
.721
.004
.000
-.02
-.15
-.21
WRITESML
334
2.95
2.81
2.94
2.96
.06
.02
.01
.01
1.14
1.14
1.15
1.16
5,246
7,716
38,204
.023
.766
.866
.13
.02
-.01
PROBSETA
334
2.64
2.66
2.60
2.58
.07
.02
.01
.01
1.25
1.20
1.21
1.20
5,231
7,696
38,055
.787
.564
.392
-.02
.03
.05
Carnegie
Peers
NSSE 2007
Carnegie Peers
READOWN
Selected
Peers
Selected Peers
Texas Tech
compared with:
Texas Tech
Effect Size f
Texas Tech
compared with:
NSSE 2007
Significance e
Carnegie Peers
Degrees of Freedom d
Selected Peers
Standard Deviation c
Texas Tech
Mean
Texas Tech
N
PROBSETB
333
2.31
2.30
2.33
2.32
.06
.02
.01
.01
1.11
1.18
1.19
1.19
5,225
367
339
.881
.695
.825
.01
-.02
-.01
EXAMS
335
5.31
5.43
5.40
5.40
.07
.02
.01
.01
1.24
1.28
1.26
1.27
5,229
7,698
38,100
.099
.202
.219
-.09
-.07
-.07
ATDART07
331
2.02
2.01
2.06
2.07
.05
.01
.01
.00
.92
.90
.90
.90
5,206
7,664
37,907
.728
.438
.397
.02
-.04
-.05
EXRCSE05
331
2.84
2.54
2.70
2.66
.06
.01
.01
.01
1.00
1.04
1.04
1.05
380
363
336
.000
.010
.001
.29
.14
.18
WORSHP05
331
2.26
2.17
2.25
2.14
.06
.02
.01
.01
1.10
1.14
1.17
1.13
5,203
365
37,893
.139
.862
.047
.08
.01
.11
OWNVIEW
331
2.73
2.67
2.69
2.68
.05
.01
.01
.00
.86
.89
.89
.89
5,204
7,662
37,897
.274
.459
.299
.06
.04
.06
OTHRVIEW
331
2.83
2.80
2.81
2.82
.05
.01
.01
.00
.85
.86
.85
.85
5,205
7,663
37,899
.549
.624
.736
.03
.03
.02
CHNGVIEW
331
2.81
2.84
2.87
2.86
.05
.01
.01
.00
.84
.84
.82
.82
5,204
7,662
37,899
.533
.236
.250
-.04
-.07
-.06
INTERN04
329
.50
.46
.52
.53
.03
.01
.01
.00
.50
.50
.50
.50
5,142
7,601
37,524
.241
.529
.274
.07
-.04
-.06
VOLNTR04
329
.63
.57
.60
.59
.03
.01
.01
.00
.48
.50
.49
.49
376
359
334
.013
.158
.096
.14
.08
.09
LRNCOM04
329
.26
.25
.25
.25
.02
.01
.01
.00
.44
.43
.43
.43
5,141
7,598
37,501
.650
.563
.686
.03
.03
.02
RESRCH04
329
.20
.17
.19
.19
.02
.01
.00
.00
.40
.37
.39
.39
366
7,594
37,507
.094
.594
.579
.10
.03
.03
FORLNG04
329
.47
.37
.43
.41
.03
.01
.01
.00
.50
.48
.50
.49
371
357
333
.001
.186
.034
.19
.08
.12
STDABR04
329
.11
.11
.14
.14
.02
.00
.00
.00
.32
.31
.35
.35
5,138
364
335
.633
.141
.102
.03
-.08
-.08
INDSTD04
329
.20
.14
.17
.17
.02
.01
.00
.00
.40
.35
.37
.38
363
354
37,502
.018
.201
.323
.15
.08
.05
SNRX04
329
.28
.25
.33
.32
.02
.01
.01
.00
.45
.43
.47
.47
369
360
334
.134
.071
.124
.09
-.10
-.08
ENVSTU
327
5.66
5.58
5.61
5.62
.07
.02
.02
.01
1.33
1.38
1.35
1.34
5,124
7,579
37,435
.322
.526
.617
.06
.04
.03
ENVFAC
327
5.21
5.31
5.35
5.41
.08
.02
.02
.01
1.37
1.38
1.33
1.35
5,128
7,578
37,446
.181
.065
.006
-.08
-.10
-.15
ENVADM
327
4.36
4.54
4.47
4.54
.10
.02
.02
.01
1.72
1.71
1.68
1.68
5,128
7,582
37,427
.078
.282
.061
-.10
-.06
-.10
ACADPR01
326
3.89
4.11
4.09
4.10
.09
.03
.02
.01
1.69
1.78
1.75
1.74
376
358
331
.028
.035
.030
-.12
-.12
-.12
WORKON01
326
1.96
1.83
1.89
1.84
.11
.02
.02
.01
1.90
1.72
1.68
1.61
363
349
329
.243
.554
.254
.07
.04
.07
WORKOF01
326
3.50
3.92
3.62
3.79
.15
.04
.03
.01
2.76
2.88
2.77
2.80
5,099
7,551
37,272
.011
.450
.062
-.15
-.04
-.10
COCURR01
326
2.23
1.95
2.04
2.07
.08
.02
.02
.01
1.38
1.42
1.44
1.50
5,104
7,549
37,272
.000
.020
.051
.20
.13
.11
a
All statistics are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
b
The 95% confidence interval for the population mean is equal to the sample mean plus/minus the product of 1.96 times the standard error of the mean.
c
A measure of the average amount individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution.
d
Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values differ from the total Ns due to weighting and the equal variances assumption.
e
Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance.
f
Effect size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the comparison group.
15
NSSE 2007 Detailed Statistics a
Texas Tech University
Seniors
Standard Error of the Mean b
NSSE 2007
Texas Tech
Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
Selected
Peers
Carnegie
Peers
NSSE 2007
324
3.67
3.38
3.51
3.49
.09
.02
.02
.01
1.61
1.55
1.56
1.55
5,097
7,539
37,229
.001
.064
.030
.19
.11
.12
CAREDE01
324
2.05
2.80
2.31
2.39
.12
.04
.03
.01
2.09
2.56
2.23
2.31
392
357
330
.000
.032
.004
-.29
-.12
-.15
COMMUTE
324
2.33
2.50
2.36
2.38
.04
.02
.01
.01
.80
1.07
.97
1.03
405
367
333
.000
.467
.203
-.16
-.03
-.06
ENVSCHOL
321
3.03
3.04
3.07
3.08
.04
.01
.01
.00
.79
.80
.78
.78
5,057
7,496
36,976
.812
.345
.225
-.01
-.05
-.07
ENVSUPRT
321
2.78
2.82
2.83
2.87
.05
.01
.01
.00
.84
.86
.84
.85
5,057
7,495
36,973
.337
.235
.053
-.06
-.07
-.11
ENVDIVRS
321
2.28
2.46
2.41
2.44
.05
.01
.01
.01
.93
.99
.98
.99
372
353
327
.001
.014
.002
-.18
-.13
-.16
ENVNACAD
321
1.83
1.89
1.89
1.91
.05
.01
.01
.00
.88
.92
.91
.91
5,052
7,491
36,935
.224
.210
.097
-.07
-.07
-.09
ENVSOCAL
320
2.16
2.16
2.18
2.17
.05
.01
.01
.00
.92
.93
.92
.92
5,048
7,487
36,917
.952
.704
.812
.00
-.02
-.01
ENVEVENT
321
2.62
2.54
2.62
2.58
.05
.01
.01
.00
.92
.96
.94
.95
5,051
7,490
36,935
.117
.895
.364
.09
.01
.05
ENVCOMPT
321
3.40
3.48
3.48
3.47
.04
.01
.01
.00
.80
.73
.72
.74
358
344
325
.098
.077
.157
-.10
-.11
-.09
GNGENLED
318
3.16
3.21
3.23
3.24
.04
.01
.01
.00
.72
.80
.79
.80
373
352
324
.263
.104
.070
-.06
-.09
-.09
GNWORK
318
2.98
3.00
3.03
3.02
.05
.01
.01
.00
.95
.95
.94
.94
5,001
7,426
36,605
.684
.379
.389
-.02
-.05
-.05
GNWRITE
318
2.90
3.01
3.04
3.06
.05
.01
.01
.00
.87
.89
.86
.87
5,000
7,421
36,605
.036
.007
.001
-.12
-.16
-.19
GNSPEAK
318
2.85
2.91
2.93
2.95
.05
.01
.01
.00
.86
.93
.91
.91
5,001
7,423
36,606
.267
.163
.056
-.06
-.08
-.11
GNANALY
318
3.25
3.31
3.32
3.33
.04
.01
.01
.00
.78
.79
.77
.77
5,002
7,423
36,608
.248
.118
.068
-.07
-.09
-.10
GNQUANT
318
3.09
3.04
3.05
3.04
.05
.01
.01
.00
.84
.90
.88
.89
5,000
7,421
36,589
.413
.467
.336
.05
.04
.05
GNCMPTS
318
3.19
3.23
3.21
3.20
.04
.01
.01
.00
.79
.86
.85
.86
370
351
324
.336
.611
.813
-.05
-.03
-.01
GNOTHERS
318
3.12
3.07
3.11
3.12
.05
.01
.01
.00
.84
.90
.87
.87
5,002
7,424
36,597
.319
.707
.980
.06
.02
.00
GNCITIZN
315
2.11
2.14
2.02
2.06
.06
.02
.01
.01
1.00
1.04
1.01
1.02
4,963
7,372
36,340
.657
.105
.330
-.03
.09
.06
GNINQ
315
2.97
2.98
2.99
3.00
.05
.01
.01
.00
.87
.91
.89
.89
4,969
7,373
36,355
.765
.692
.514
-.02
-.02
-.04
GNSELF
315
2.77
2.73
2.74
2.78
.06
.02
.01
.01
.98
1.03
1.01
1.00
4,969
7,374
36,352
.607
.722
.804
.03
.02
-.01
GNDIVERS
315
2.40
2.62
2.55
2.59
.06
.01
.01
.01
.99
.99
.98
.99
4,964
7,368
36,336
.000
.007
.000
-.23
-.15
-.20
GNPROBSV
315
2.75
2.74
2.74
2.74
.05
.01
.01
.01
.94
.97
.95
.95
4,968
7,374
36,356
.764
.856
.772
.02
.01
.02
GNETHICS
315
2.63
2.63
2.66
2.66
.06
.02
.01
.01
.98
1.06
1.05
1.04
365
347
36,351
.934
.643
.693
.00
-.02
-.02
Carnegie
Peers
NSSE 2007
Carnegie Peers
SOCIAL05
Selected
Peers
Selected Peers
Texas Tech
compared with:
Texas Tech
Effect Size f
Texas Tech
compared with:
NSSE 2007
Significance e
Carnegie Peers
Degrees of Freedom d
Selected Peers
Standard Deviation c
Texas Tech
Mean
Texas Tech
N
GNCOMMUN
315
2.31
2.39
2.42
2.43
.05
.02
.01
.01
.97
1.03
1.02
1.02
363
346
320
.130
.037
.024
-.08
-.11
-.12
GNSPIRIT
315
1.75
1.85
1.95
1.92
.05
.02
.01
.01
.96
1.05
1.12
1.07
367
353
321
.071
.000
.003
-.10
-.18
-.15
ADVISE
314
2.74
2.81
2.77
2.84
.05
.01
.01
.01
.95
.96
.95
.95
4,977
7,380
36,410
.197
.514
.057
-.08
-.04
-.11
ENTIREXP
315
3.21
3.15
3.18
3.20
.04
.01
.01
.00
.75
.75
.74
.74
4,980
7,382
36,418
.217
.487
.799
.07
.04
.01
SAMECOLL
315
3.26
3.17
3.18
3.19
.05
.01
.01
.00
.90
.86
.86
.86
4,976
7,380
36,403
.095
.130
.164
.10
.09
.08
a
All statistics are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size.
b
The 95% confidence interval for the population mean is equal to the sample mean plus/minus the product of 1.96 times the standard error of the mean.
c
A measure of the average amount individual scores deviate from the mean of all the scores in the distribution.
d
Degrees of freedom used to compute the t-tests. Values differ from the total Ns due to weighting and the equal variances assumption.
e
Statistical significance represents the probability that the difference between the mean of your institution and that of the comparison group occurred by chance.
f
Effect size is calculated by subtracting the comparison group mean from the school mean, and dividing the result by the standard deviation of the comparison group.
IPEDS: 229115
16
Texas Tech University
Frequency Distributions
August 2007
Interpreting the Frequency Distributions Report
Sample
The Frequency Distributions report is based on information from all randomly selected
students for both your institution and your comparison institutions. Targeted oversamples and
other non-randomly selected students are not included in this report.
Weighting
Weights adjusting for gender, enrollment status, and institutional size are
applied to the percentage column (%) of this report. Weights are computed
separately for first-year students and seniors. Weighted results present a more
accurate representation of your institution and comparison group students.
Only the column percents are weighted. The counts are the actual number of
respondents. Because the counts are unweighted and the column percentages
are weighted, you will not be able to calculate the column percent directly
from the count numbers. For more information about weighting, please visit
the NSSE Web site at
www.nsse.iub.edu/2007_Institutional_Report/NSSE_2007_Weighting.cfm
Variables
The items from the NSSE survey appear in the left column in the same order and wording as
they appear on the instrument.
Variable Names
The name of each variable appears in the first column for easy reference to your raw data file
and the Mean Comparisons report.
Class
Benchmark
Frequency distributions are reported separately for first-year students and
Items that comprise the five “Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice” are indicated by
seniors. Institution-reported class ranks are used.
the following:
LAC=Level of Academic
Challenge
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions
ACL=Active and
NSSEville State University
Count
Collaborative Learning
First-Year Students
Seniors
The Count column
SFI=Student-Faculty
NSSEville State Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
NSSEville State Selected Peers
Carnegie Peers
NSSE 2007
represents the actual
Interaction
Asked questions in class or
CLQUEST
Never
7
1%
210
3%
202
2%
3,791
3%
1
0%
99
2%
89
1%
2,111
2%
contributed to class discussions
(ACL)
Sometimes
138
31%
2721 40%
3,083 33%
47,772 38%
58
17%
1570 27%
1,566 21%
32,172 27%
EEE=Enriching Educational
number of students who
Often
163
40%
2404 35%
3,290 38%
46,652 35%
118
37%
1958 32%
2,458 34%
42,486 33%
Very often
94
27%
1549 22%
2,158 26%
32,486 23%
154
46%
2465 39%
3,233 44%
51,477 37%
Experiences
responded to the particular
Total
402 100%
6884 100%
8,733 100%
130,701 100%
331 100%
6092 100%
7,346 100%
128,246 100%
Made a class presentation
CLPRESEN Never
43
11%
948 14%
955 12%
17,353 16%
8
3%
261
5%
274
4%
5,026
5%
option in each question.
SCE=Supportive Campus
(ACL)
Sometimes
244
57%
3768 54%
4,515 50%
71,227 53%
120
36%
2097 36%
2,153 31%
41,250 34%
Often
98
25%
1739 25%
2,529 28%
32,693 24%
124
37%
2334 38%
2,856 38%
49,222 37%
Counts are unweighted.
Environment
a
Variable
Response Options
Count
%
Count
%
Count
%
426
6881
988
2170
2195
1525
6878
157
1536
3174
2007
6874
422
2343
2613
1497
6875
7%
100%
14%
32%
32%
22%
100%
2%
22%
46%
29%
100%
6%
34%
38%
22%
100%
726
8,725
884
2,494
2,998
2,349
8,725
179
1,758
3,963
2,826
8,726
598
3,107
3,246
1,771
8,722
9%
100%
11%
29%
34%
27%
100%
3%
21%
45%
31%
100%
8%
34%
38%
21%
100%
Count
%
Count
%
Count
%
Count
%
1398
6090
982
2387
1620
1101
6090
52
716
2389
2934
6091
348
1926
2129
1683
6086
22%
100%
17%
40%
26%
17%
100%
1%
13%
40%
46%
100%
6%
32%
35%
27%
100%
2,061
7,344
1,065
2,702
2,024
1,556
7,347
78
869
2,913
3,485
7,345
507
2,470
2,489
1,870
7,336
27%
100%
14%
36%
28%
22%
100%
1%
12%
40%
47%
100%
7%
33%
34%
25%
100%
Count
%
1a.
b.
Very often
Total
c.
Prepared two or more drafts of
a paper or assignment before
turning it in
REWROPAP
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
Total
Response Options
Response options appear in
the second column just as they
appear on the instrument.
d.
Worked on a paper or project
that required integrating ideas
or information from various
sources
INTEGRAT
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
e.
Included diverse perspectives
(different races, religions,
genders, political beliefs, etc.)
in class discussions or
assignments
DIVCLASS
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
Total
Total
17
402
35
101
150
115
401
10
76
186
130
402
25
134
172
71
402
7%
100%
10%
23%
38%
29%
100%
3%
16%
46%
35%
100%
6%
33%
39%
22%
100%
9,340
130,613
17,251
41,938
42,107
29,281
130,577
2,737
28,128
58,796
40,907
130,568
7,741
42,685
49,846
30,252
130,524
7%
100%
13%
31%
32%
23%
100%
3%
22%
44%
31%
100%
7%
33%
38%
22%
100%
79
331
62
123
81
65
331
2
50
134
145
331
16
100
117
97
330
24%
100%
19%
36%
26%
19%
100%
1%
15%
41%
43%
100%
5%
30%
35%
29%
100%
32,693
128,191
20,747
49,272
34,025
24,132
128,176
1,210
15,432
49,980
61,533
128,155
8,164
40,724
44,705
34,484
128,077
24%
100%
16%
38%
27%
19%
100%
1%
13%
40%
46%
100%
8%
33%
34%
26%
100%
Column Percentage (%)
This column represents the
weighted percentage of
students responding to the
particular option in each
question.
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
1a. Asked questions in class or
contributed to class
discussions
Response Options
CLQUEST
(ACL)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
Count
Total
b.
Made a class presentation
CLPRESEN
(ACL)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
c.
Prepared two or more drafts of
a paper or assignment before
turning it in
REWROPAP
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
d.
Worked on a paper or project
that required integrating ideas
or information from various
sources
INTEGRAT
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
e.
Included diverse perspectives
(different races, religions,
genders, political beliefs, etc.)
in class discussions or writing
assignments
DIVCLASS
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
f.
Come to class without
completing readings or
assignments
CLUNPREP
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
g.
Worked with other students
on projects during class
CLASSGRP
(ACL)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
a
18
111
62
39
230
81
96
38
15
230
62
77
54
37
230
6
69
93
61
229
27
77
90
35
229
41
119
48
21
229
50
90
65
24
229
%
8%
48%
26%
17%
100%
36%
42%
16%
7%
100%
26%
34%
25%
15%
100%
3%
29%
42%
26%
100%
11%
32%
42%
14%
100%
19%
51%
21%
9%
100%
22%
39%
28%
11%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
547
3952
2747
1366
8612
1867
4533
1690
523
8613
1425
2567
2630
1986
8608
358
2199
3604
2443
8604
823
2821
3154
1803
8601
1628
5125
1302
552
8607
1282
3728
2598
994
8602
7%
46%
31%
16%
100%
23%
52%
18%
6%
100%
18%
30%
31%
22%
100%
5%
26%
41%
28%
100%
9%
33%
37%
21%
100%
19%
59%
16%
7%
100%
16%
44%
30%
11%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
851
8,894
7,274
4,090
21,109
3,914
11,965
4,127
1,092
21,098
3,122
6,562
6,666
4,745
21,095
497
4,818
9,464
6,310
21,089
1,336
6,806
8,237
4,707
21,086
4,302
12,609
2,959
1,203
21,073
2,597
9,858
6,627
2,007
21,089
%
4%
43%
34%
19%
100%
20%
55%
20%
6%
100%
15%
30%
33%
23%
100%
3%
23%
44%
30%
100%
7%
33%
38%
22%
100%
20%
60%
15%
6%
100%
12%
46%
32%
10%
100%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
4,832
55,738
52,804
34,900
148,274
20,307
80,898
36,388
10,647
148,240
19,489
46,847
47,545
34,305
148,186
2,949
31,660
66,498
47,043
148,150
8,965
48,652
56,783
33,663
148,063
34,781
87,536
18,231
7,514
148,062
17,758
68,928
46,599
14,837
148,122
%
4%
39%
35%
22%
100%
16%
54%
23%
7%
100%
14%
31%
32%
23%
100%
3%
23%
44%
31%
100%
7%
33%
38%
22%
100%
22%
59%
13%
6%
100%
12%
45%
32%
10%
100%
Texas Tech
Count
7
131
119
101
358
17
133
134
74
358
77
141
89
50
357
4
61
156
137
358
43
126
101
88
358
52
190
77
39
358
44
165
97
52
358
%
2%
37%
32%
28%
100%
5%
38%
37%
19%
100%
21%
40%
24%
15%
100%
1%
16%
45%
37%
100%
12%
35%
30%
23%
100%
14%
53%
22%
11%
100%
13%
46%
27%
14%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
339
3633
3849
3866
11687
790
4068
3970
2856
11684
1652
4144
3389
2496
11681
176
1666
4676
5157
11675
965
3577
3989
3132
11663
2236
6835
1761
836
11668
1374
4694
3529
2079
11676
%
3%
33%
32%
32%
100%
8%
37%
33%
22%
100%
15%
36%
28%
20%
100%
2%
15%
40%
43%
100%
9%
31%
34%
26%
100%
17%
58%
16%
8%
100%
12%
41%
29%
17%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
515
6,742
7,720
7,871
22,848
1,293
8,580
8,101
4,868
22,842
4,096
8,858
5,975
3,911
22,840
295
3,106
9,069
10,365
22,835
1,799
7,497
7,719
5,799
22,814
3,815
13,661
3,748
1,598
22,822
2,574
10,114
6,748
3,397
22,833
%
3%
30%
33%
34%
100%
6%
38%
35%
21%
100%
17%
38%
27%
18%
100%
1%
14%
40%
44%
100%
8%
34%
34%
25%
100%
17%
59%
17%
7%
100%
11%
44%
30%
15%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
2,710
38,478
49,142
57,735
148,065
6,694
48,991
55,631
36,710
148,026
24,481
56,933
39,328
27,250
147,992
1,473
18,239
57,639
70,630
147,981
9,426
46,552
51,385
40,503
147,866
28,923
87,577
21,753
9,661
147,914
15,395
63,932
45,705
22,915
147,947
19
%
2%
28%
33%
36%
100%
6%
35%
36%
23%
100%
17%
38%
27%
18%
100%
1%
14%
40%
46%
100%
7%
32%
34%
27%
100%
19%
59%
16%
7%
100%
11%
43%
31%
16%
100%
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
Response Options
h.
Worked with classmates
outside of class to prepare
class assignments
OCCGRP
(ACL)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
i.
Put together ideas or concepts
from different courses when
completing assignments or
during class discussions
INTIDEAS
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
j.
Tutored or taught other
students (paid or voluntary)
TUTOR
(ACL)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
k.
Participated in a communitybased project (e.g. service
learning) as part of a regular
course
COMMPROJ Never
(ACL)
Sometimes
Often
Very often
l.
Used an electronic medium
(listserv, chat group, Internet,
instant messaging, etc.) to
discuss or complete an
assignment
ITACADEM
(EEE)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
EMAIL
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
FACGRADE
(SFI)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
Count
Total
Total
Total
Total
m. Used e-mail to communicate
Total
with an instructor
Total
n.
Discussed grades or
assignments with an instructor
Total
a
37
99
57
36
229
20
107
63
24
214
105
76
20
13
214
136
52
20
5
213
33
75
45
60
213
3
70
73
68
214
19
104
51
40
214
%
14%
44%
25%
16%
100%
8%
50%
30%
12%
100%
46%
37%
10%
7%
100%
63%
25%
9%
3%
100%
15%
33%
22%
30%
100%
2%
35%
34%
30%
100%
8%
49%
25%
18%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
1276
3656
2483
1195
8610
695
3496
2943
997
8131
3877
2920
939
399
8135
5338
1842
649
302
8131
1516
2543
2077
1998
8134
241
2418
2888
2582
8129
730
3599
2487
1320
8136
16%
42%
29%
14%
100%
9%
43%
36%
12%
100%
48%
36%
11%
5%
100%
68%
22%
7%
3%
100%
18%
31%
26%
25%
100%
4%
32%
34%
31%
100%
10%
45%
29%
16%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
2,988
9,607
6,061
2,441
21,097
1,335
8,418
7,565
2,607
19,925
9,684
7,049
2,349
856
19,938
12,390
4,900
1,854
785
19,929
3,208
6,296
5,461
4,967
19,932
298
4,545
7,424
7,658
19,925
1,677
8,826
6,014
3,412
19,929
%
15%
45%
28%
12%
100%
7%
42%
38%
13%
100%
49%
35%
12%
4%
100%
63%
24%
9%
4%
100%
16%
31%
28%
25%
100%
2%
24%
37%
37%
100%
8%
45%
30%
17%
100%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
18,604
66,200
45,487
17,872
148,163
8,750
59,242
53,638
19,162
140,792
71,457
48,128
14,908
6,344
140,837
85,936
36,631
12,820
5,383
140,770
23,150
44,475
38,658
34,518
140,801
2,178
31,722
52,582
54,320
140,802
10,558
60,518
44,658
25,065
140,799
%
15%
45%
29%
12%
100%
7%
42%
37%
13%
100%
51%
34%
11%
5%
100%
64%
24%
8%
4%
100%
16%
31%
27%
25%
100%
2%
25%
37%
36%
100%
8%
44%
31%
17%
100%
Texas Tech
Count
12
110
119
117
358
13
95
142
94
344
140
119
44
41
344
188
101
36
18
343
67
91
105
81
344
2
50
105
187
344
9
128
119
88
344
%
4%
31%
35%
31%
100%
4%
29%
41%
27%
100%
41%
35%
13%
12%
100%
56%
29%
10%
5%
100%
18%
26%
32%
24%
100%
1%
14%
31%
54%
100%
2%
37%
35%
26%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
859
3845
3888
3088
11680
406
3177
4825
2951
11359
4543
4240
1478
1098
11359
6085
3219
1256
796
11356
1181
3044
3024
4113
11362
101
2043
3713
5506
11363
511
4099
3698
3050
11358
%
7%
34%
33%
26%
100%
4%
29%
42%
26%
100%
41%
36%
13%
10%
100%
56%
27%
10%
6%
100%
11%
27%
27%
36%
100%
1%
20%
34%
46%
100%
5%
38%
32%
24%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
1,555
7,644
7,592
6,050
22,841
632
6,105
9,642
5,704
22,083
9,047
8,173
2,857
2,007
22,084
12,133
6,309
2,301
1,331
22,074
2,607
6,116
5,873
7,488
22,084
142
3,076
7,110
11,756
22,084
983
8,174
7,248
5,674
22,079
%
7%
34%
33%
26%
100%
3%
28%
44%
25%
100%
42%
37%
13%
9%
100%
56%
28%
10%
6%
100%
12%
28%
27%
34%
100%
1%
16%
33%
51%
100%
5%
38%
33%
25%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
9,966
50,744
50,996
36,276
147,982
4,096
39,876
62,694
37,144
143,810
59,923
51,447
18,422
14,046
143,838
73,225
44,407
16,575
9,578
143,785
16,500
40,717
38,319
48,297
143,833
865
19,962
45,574
77,437
143,838
6,013
50,975
48,028
38,803
143,819
20
%
7%
35%
34%
24%
100%
3%
28%
43%
25%
100%
43%
36%
13%
9%
100%
54%
29%
11%
6%
100%
11%
28%
27%
34%
100%
1%
16%
32%
51%
100%
5%
37%
33%
25%
100%
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
Response Options
o.
Talked about career plans
with a faculty member or
advisor
FACPLANS
(SFI)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
p.
Discussed ideas from your
readings or classes with
faculty members outside of
class
FACIDEAS
(SFI)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
q.
Received prompt written or
oral feedback from faculty on
your academic performance
FACFEED
(SFI)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
r.
Worked harder than you
thought you could to meet an
instructor's standards or
expectations
WORKHARD Never
(LAC)
Sometimes
Often
Very often
s.
Worked with faculty members
on activities other than
coursework (committees,
orientation, student life
activities, etc.)
FACOTHER
(SFI)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
t.
Discussed ideas from your
readings or classes with others
outside of class (students,
family members, co-workers,
etc.)
OOCIDEAS
(ACL)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
u.
Had serious conversations
with students of a different
race or ethnicity than your
own
DIVRSTUD
(EEE)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
Count
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
a
62
95
35
22
214
112
64
26
12
214
19
108
55
25
207
24
74
78
30
206
123
53
19
12
207
24
96
54
33
207
33
69
52
53
207
%
28%
46%
16%
10%
100%
49%
32%
13%
6%
100%
9%
53%
26%
12%
100%
12%
34%
40%
14%
100%
57%
26%
11%
6%
100%
12%
45%
27%
16%
100%
16%
32%
27%
25%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
1971
3794
1623
743
8131
3637
2975
1058
461
8131
890
3244
2802
1053
7989
669
3152
2949
1215
7985
4812
2073
763
337
7985
655
2995
2734
1600
7984
1263
2549
2165
2007
7984
26%
46%
20%
9%
100%
45%
36%
13%
5%
100%
12%
41%
34%
12%
100%
9%
40%
36%
14%
100%
62%
25%
9%
4%
100%
9%
38%
34%
20%
100%
16%
32%
27%
25%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
5,177
9,449
3,712
1,585
19,923
8,656
7,613
2,586
1,071
19,926
1,528
7,611
7,747
2,646
19,532
1,614
7,789
7,226
2,901
19,530
11,802
5,171
1,861
697
19,531
1,416
7,621
6,831
3,659
19,527
2,912
6,666
5,271
4,676
19,525
%
26%
47%
19%
8%
100%
44%
38%
13%
5%
100%
8%
39%
39%
13%
100%
9%
40%
36%
15%
100%
61%
26%
10%
3%
100%
8%
39%
35%
18%
100%
15%
34%
27%
24%
100%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
31,805
66,940
29,096
12,955
140,796
56,729
56,224
19,452
8,376
140,781
9,543
51,579
56,240
20,969
138,331
10,156
53,676
52,577
21,908
138,317
78,074
39,856
14,567
5,790
138,287
9,123
52,507
48,949
27,685
138,264
21,884
47,869
36,490
32,018
138,261
%
24%
47%
20%
9%
100%
42%
39%
14%
6%
100%
8%
39%
39%
14%
100%
8%
39%
37%
15%
100%
59%
27%
10%
4%
100%
8%
38%
35%
19%
100%
16%
34%
27%
23%
100%
Texas Tech
Count
65
127
85
67
344
103
140
68
33
344
23
117
139
60
339
35
117
131
56
339
154
106
52
27
339
18
118
126
77
339
43
124
85
87
339
%
20%
37%
24%
18%
100%
30%
41%
21%
9%
100%
7%
35%
41%
17%
100%
11%
35%
38%
16%
100%
46%
31%
16%
7%
100%
5%
34%
40%
21%
100%
13%
36%
25%
27%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
2009
4755
2773
1824
11361
3482
4826
1947
1103
11358
624
3700
4814
2122
11260
638
3872
4294
2451
11255
5636
3324
1446
849
11255
510
3557
4181
3006
11254
1408
3602
3255
2977
11242
%
20%
42%
23%
14%
100%
32%
42%
17%
9%
100%
6%
34%
43%
17%
100%
7%
36%
37%
20%
100%
52%
29%
13%
6%
100%
5%
32%
37%
26%
100%
11%
31%
30%
28%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
3,766
9,429
5,473
3,415
22,083
6,447
9,903
3,719
2,006
22,075
1,016
7,036
9,810
3,968
21,830
1,441
8,223
8,103
4,058
21,825
10,145
7,074
2,939
1,661
21,819
895
7,266
8,193
5,471
21,825
2,522
7,670
6,067
5,555
21,814
%
18%
43%
24%
14%
100%
30%
44%
17%
9%
100%
5%
33%
44%
18%
100%
7%
38%
37%
18%
100%
49%
31%
13%
7%
100%
4%
33%
38%
25%
100%
12%
35%
28%
26%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
21,704
58,624
37,335
26,166
143,829
38,551
64,126
26,247
14,889
143,813
5,964
43,379
64,700
28,326
142,369
8,500
50,868
54,096
28,855
142,319
62,675
46,032
21,006
12,594
142,307
5,708
46,459
53,464
36,680
142,311
18,043
51,171
38,128
34,880
142,222
21
%
17%
42%
24%
16%
100%
29%
44%
17%
10%
100%
5%
32%
44%
18%
100%
7%
37%
37%
19%
100%
48%
31%
13%
8%
100%
5%
33%
37%
25%
100%
12%
35%
28%
25%
100%
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
v.
Had serious conversations
with students who are very
different from you in terms of
their religious beliefs, political
opinions, or personal values
2a. Coursework emphasizes:
Response Options
DIFFSTU2
(EEE)
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
MEMORIZE
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
Count
Total
Memorizing facts, ideas, or
methods from your courses
and readings
Total
b.
Coursework emphasizes:
Analyzing the basic elements
of an idea, experience, or
theory
ANALYZE
(LAC)
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
c.
Coursework emphasizes:
Synthesizing and organizing
ideas, information, or
experiences
SYNTHESZ
(LAC)
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
d.
Coursework emphasizes:
Making judgments about the
value of information,
arguments, or methods
EVALUATE
(LAC)
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
e.
Coursework emphasizes:
Applying theories or concepts
to practical problems or in
new situations
APPLYING
(LAC)
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
READASGN
(LAC)
None
1-4
5-10
11-20
More than 20
Total
Total
Total
Total
3a. Number of assigned
textbooks, books, or booklength packs of course
readings
Total
a
40
68
54
45
207
13
51
86
55
205
10
49
91
55
205
8
66
87
44
205
19
56
80
50
205
12
48
82
63
205
5
72
79
37
11
204
%
19%
33%
26%
23%
100%
6%
25%
42%
28%
100%
4%
25%
44%
27%
100%
5%
31%
43%
22%
100%
9%
27%
38%
26%
100%
6%
24%
40%
31%
100%
2%
38%
39%
15%
6%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
1005
2610
2306
2064
7985
401
2112
3248
2135
7896
231
1815
3515
2331
7892
458
2442
3229
1767
7896
544
2254
3215
1875
7888
380
1970
3130
2413
7893
85
2060
3732
1451
536
7864
13%
33%
29%
26%
100%
5%
28%
40%
27%
100%
3%
23%
45%
30%
100%
6%
32%
40%
22%
100%
7%
29%
40%
24%
100%
5%
25%
40%
30%
100%
1%
26%
48%
18%
7%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
2,101
6,456
5,798
5,168
19,523
929
5,003
7,995
5,424
19,351
413
3,657
8,834
6,437
19,341
854
5,459
8,201
4,825
19,339
1,115
5,393
8,127
4,705
19,340
773
4,368
7,753
6,447
19,341
160
3,666
8,620
4,800
2,025
19,271
%
11%
33%
30%
26%
100%
5%
26%
41%
28%
100%
2%
20%
46%
32%
100%
5%
29%
42%
24%
100%
6%
28%
42%
24%
100%
4%
23%
40%
33%
100%
1%
21%
46%
23%
9%
100%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
15,031
46,651
40,913
35,656
138,251
7,841
37,791
55,890
35,668
137,190
2,782
26,481
62,358
45,502
137,123
5,949
38,998
58,043
34,102
137,092
7,125
38,429
57,467
34,070
137,091
4,934
31,472
56,011
44,698
137,115
952
26,230
58,469
35,838
15,243
136,732
%
12%
34%
29%
25%
100%
6%
27%
41%
26%
100%
2%
20%
45%
32%
100%
5%
30%
42%
24%
100%
6%
29%
41%
24%
100%
4%
23%
40%
32%
100%
1%
22%
44%
24%
10%
100%
Texas Tech
Count
32
112
90
105
339
26
92
137
80
335
4
50
140
141
335
14
78
136
107
335
23
81
125
105
334
9
58
119
149
335
7
103
121
65
38
334
%
9%
34%
25%
31%
100%
8%
27%
42%
23%
100%
1%
15%
42%
42%
100%
5%
24%
41%
31%
100%
6%
24%
39%
31%
100%
3%
19%
34%
44%
100%
2%
31%
37%
18%
11%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
1223
3787
3323
2915
11248
900
3451
4173
2643
11167
215
1778
4810
4355
11158
441
2561
4502
3644
11148
601
2693
4342
3522
11158
387
1977
4135
4664
11163
159
3653
4390
1753
1171
11126
%
10%
33%
30%
27%
100%
8%
31%
36%
24%
100%
2%
16%
44%
39%
100%
4%
24%
41%
31%
100%
6%
25%
39%
30%
100%
4%
18%
37%
41%
100%
1%
33%
39%
16%
10%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
1,958
7,505
6,579
5,774
21,816
1,797
6,636
8,045
5,182
21,660
297
3,023
9,584
8,751
21,655
757
4,962
8,962
6,971
21,652
1,168
5,303
8,554
6,629
21,654
637
3,670
8,123
9,228
21,658
268
5,872
8,610
4,284
2,560
21,594
%
10%
35%
30%
25%
100%
8%
31%
37%
24%
100%
2%
14%
44%
40%
100%
4%
24%
41%
31%
100%
6%
25%
40%
30%
100%
3%
17%
38%
42%
100%
1%
29%
40%
19%
11%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
13,240
50,104
42,157
36,742
142,243
12,794
44,777
51,558
32,288
141,417
2,001
19,850
61,514
58,014
141,379
4,560
30,817
58,159
47,783
141,319
6,801
33,123
56,377
45,045
141,346
3,792
23,679
53,233
60,668
141,372
1,759
37,137
54,468
29,361
18,177
140,902
22
%
10%
35%
30%
26%
100%
9%
31%
37%
23%
100%
2%
15%
43%
40%
100%
4%
23%
41%
33%
100%
5%
24%
39%
31%
100%
3%
18%
38%
42%
100%
1%
28%
39%
20%
12%
100%
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
Response Options
b.
Number of books read on
your own (not assigned) for
personal enjoyment or
academic enrichment
READOWN
None
1-4
5-10
11-20
More than 20
c.
Number of written papers or
reports of 20 pages or more
WRITEMOR
(LAC)
None
1-4
5-10
11-20
More than 20
d.
Number of written papers or
reports between 5 and 19
pages
WRITEMID
(LAC)
None
1-4
5-10
11-20
More than 20
e.
Number of written papers or
reports of fewer than 5 pages
WRITESML
(LAC)
None
1-4
5-10
11-20
More than 20
PROBSETA
None
1-2
3-4
5-6
More than 6
PROBSETB
None
1-2
3-4
5-6
More than 6
Count
Total
Total
Total
Total
4a. Number of problem sets that
take you more than an hour to
complete
Total
b.
Number of problem sets that
take you less than an hour to
complete
Total
a
73
104
19
6
2
204
178
20
3
2
1
204
61
120
18
4
1
204
8
73
56
39
28
204
19
81
67
14
22
203
24
70
60
22
27
203
%
38%
50%
9%
3%
1%
100%
85%
11%
2%
1%
1%
100%
30%
60%
8%
1%
1%
100%
4%
35%
27%
21%
14%
100%
8%
38%
33%
7%
13%
100%
11%
33%
30%
11%
15%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
2156
4268
874
285
280
7863
6609
935
192
71
59
7866
1951
4167
1384
288
72
7862
411
3323
2424
1160
544
7862
1056
2816
2474
768
734
7848
1169
3033
1927
802
914
7845
28%
54%
12%
4%
3%
100%
84%
12%
3%
1%
1%
100%
25%
52%
18%
4%
1%
100%
5%
42%
30%
15%
7%
100%
13%
35%
32%
10%
10%
100%
16%
39%
24%
10%
11%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
4,979
10,647
2,373
679
598
19,276
16,336
2,257
388
170
123
19,274
2,352
10,254
5,105
1,314
245
19,270
542
6,030
6,606
3,946
2,149
19,273
2,643
7,010
5,935
1,949
1,695
19,232
2,463
6,998
5,278
2,235
2,241
19,215
%
26%
55%
13%
3%
3%
100%
84%
12%
2%
1%
1%
100%
13%
53%
25%
7%
1%
100%
3%
32%
34%
20%
10%
100%
14%
37%
30%
10%
9%
100%
13%
36%
28%
12%
12%
100%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
35,391
75,684
16,698
4,726
4,234
136,733
114,930
16,494
2,975
1,275
1,050
136,724
17,190
72,710
35,742
9,193
1,880
136,715
3,448
39,961
46,999
29,994
16,367
136,769
17,732
49,545
43,744
13,889
11,480
136,390
18,285
48,948
37,102
16,254
15,717
136,306
%
26%
55%
12%
3%
3%
100%
83%
13%
3%
1%
1%
100%
15%
53%
24%
6%
1%
100%
3%
32%
34%
20%
11%
100%
13%
37%
31%
10%
9%
100%
14%
36%
27%
11%
12%
100%
Texas Tech
Count
92
172
38
18
14
334
175
142
12
3
2
334
43
168
89
27
7
334
26
106
92
71
39
334
64
112
90
30
38
334
76
139
74
23
21
333
%
27%
52%
11%
6%
5%
100%
53%
41%
4%
1%
1%
100%
13%
51%
26%
8%
2%
100%
8%
33%
27%
22%
11%
100%
19%
34%
26%
9%
13%
100%
24%
41%
21%
6%
7%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
2402
6029
1598
537
562
11128
6141
4078
596
169
145
11129
1580
5560
2827
839
325
11131
928
4469
2817
1646
1268
11128
1897
3529
3305
1120
1243
11094
3030
4197
2068
877
911
11083
%
21%
55%
15%
5%
5%
100%
55%
36%
6%
2%
1%
100%
14%
49%
26%
8%
3%
100%
9%
39%
26%
15%
11%
100%
17%
32%
30%
10%
11%
100%
28%
38%
19%
8%
8%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
4,473
11,792
3,325
1,061
942
21,593
10,941
9,024
1,151
268
208
21,592
2,097
9,741
6,540
2,357
855
21,590
1,372
7,552
5,983
3,747
2,940
21,594
4,443
6,906
5,975
1,973
2,236
21,533
6,019
7,867
4,280
1,641
1,720
21,527
%
21%
55%
15%
5%
4%
100%
52%
40%
6%
1%
1%
100%
11%
46%
29%
10%
4%
100%
7%
36%
27%
17%
13%
100%
19%
32%
29%
9%
11%
100%
27%
37%
19%
8%
8%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
29,781
76,567
21,393
6,841
6,355
140,937
69,124
60,429
7,911
1,895
1,543
140,902
11,797
61,334
45,341
16,497
5,937
140,906
8,382
46,648
39,555
25,703
20,655
140,943
28,683
45,265
39,562
13,059
13,795
140,364
38,839
50,195
28,890
11,026
11,351
140,301
23
%
21%
54%
15%
5%
5%
100%
50%
41%
6%
2%
1%
100%
9%
45%
31%
11%
4%
100%
7%
35%
28%
17%
14%
100%
20%
33%
28%
9%
10%
100%
28%
36%
20%
8%
8%
100%
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
5.
Mark the box that best
represents the extent to which
your examinations during the
current school year challenged
you to do your best work
EXAMS
Response Options
Count
1 Very little
2
3
4
5
6
7 Very much
Total
6a. Attended an art exhibit, play,
ATDART07
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
dance, music, theater, or other
performance
Total
b.
Exercised or participated in
physical fitness activities
EXRCSE05
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
c.
Participated in activities to
enhance your spirituality
(worship, meditation, prayer,
etc.)
WORSHP05
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
d.
Examined the strengths and
weaknesses of your own views
on a topic or issue
OWNVIEW
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
e.
Tried to better understand
someone else's views by
imagining how an issue looks
from his or her perspective
OTHRVIEW
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
f.
Learned something that
changed the way you
understand an issue or
concept
CHNGVIEW
Never
Sometimes
Often
Very often
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
a
2
2
9
33
56
60
40
202
45
91
39
26
201
12
52
62
75
201
58
58
31
54
201
25
69
75
32
201
14
71
76
39
200
8
62
92
39
201
%
1%
1%
5%
15%
27%
29%
22%
100%
23%
46%
19%
12%
100%
6%
25%
31%
38%
100%
29%
30%
15%
26%
100%
12%
34%
38%
16%
100%
8%
36%
37%
19%
100%
4%
30%
46%
19%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
43
100
288
1052
2418
2450
1496
7847
1871
3709
1350
842
7772
1071
2329
1970
2402
7772
3067
2151
1151
1403
7772
845
3113
2568
1245
7771
531
2695
2931
1615
7772
364
2715
2960
1733
7772
1%
1%
4%
14%
30%
31%
19%
100%
25%
47%
17%
10%
100%
13%
31%
25%
31%
100%
41%
28%
14%
17%
100%
11%
40%
33%
16%
100%
7%
35%
38%
21%
100%
5%
35%
38%
22%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
104
235
624
2,250
5,993
6,507
3,528
19,241
4,182
9,048
3,710
2,171
19,111
2,132
5,715
4,973
6,287
19,107
7,424
5,303
2,690
3,692
19,109
1,875
7,601
6,463
3,164
19,103
1,172
6,768
7,241
3,927
19,108
785
6,565
7,434
4,319
19,103
%
1%
1%
3%
12%
32%
33%
18%
100%
23%
47%
19%
12%
100%
11%
30%
27%
32%
100%
40%
27%
14%
19%
100%
10%
40%
33%
16%
100%
7%
35%
38%
21%
100%
5%
35%
39%
22%
100%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
778
1,562
4,540
16,678
43,051
45,485
24,421
136,515
26,688
63,896
28,041
16,852
135,477
15,789
39,057
34,241
46,381
135,468
52,936
38,664
19,935
23,915
135,450
12,919
54,085
45,654
22,759
135,417
7,986
47,874
51,399
28,180
135,439
5,234
45,496
53,245
31,457
135,432
%
1%
1%
4%
13%
32%
32%
18%
100%
23%
47%
19%
11%
100%
13%
29%
25%
32%
100%
41%
28%
14%
17%
100%
10%
40%
33%
16%
100%
7%
35%
37%
21%
100%
4%
34%
39%
23%
100%
Texas Tech
Count
3
8
17
42
99
112
54
335
106
141
49
35
331
34
91
99
107
331
99
107
57
68
331
21
117
126
67
331
13
114
120
84
331
12
118
118
83
331
%
1%
2%
4%
13%
32%
32%
16%
100%
32%
43%
15%
9%
100%
11%
26%
30%
32%
100%
31%
32%
17%
20%
100%
7%
33%
40%
20%
100%
4%
34%
38%
25%
100%
4%
36%
37%
24%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
100
190
464
1276
3011
3347
2707
11095
3665
5042
1468
862
11037
2034
3994
2419
2586
11033
3869
3055
1692
2418
11034
953
3946
3943
2192
11034
593
3567
4310
2566
11036
415
3574
4373
2671
11033
%
1%
2%
4%
12%
28%
30%
22%
100%
31%
46%
14%
9%
100%
17%
36%
22%
24%
100%
38%
28%
15%
20%
100%
9%
35%
36%
20%
100%
6%
32%
39%
23%
100%
4%
32%
39%
25%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
228
385
939
2,542
6,355
7,030
4,076
21,555
5,847
10,248
3,337
2,008
21,440
2,750
6,836
5,167
6,686
21,439
7,619
5,908
3,133
4,774
21,434
1,644
7,769
7,622
4,400
21,435
1,001
7,045
8,294
5,097
21,437
659
6,753
8,717
5,305
21,434
%
1%
2%
4%
11%
30%
32%
19%
100%
28%
47%
15%
10%
100%
14%
33%
24%
30%
100%
36%
27%
14%
23%
100%
8%
36%
35%
21%
100%
5%
33%
38%
24%
100%
3%
32%
40%
25%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
1,543
2,475
5,800
16,675
41,477
44,762
27,834
140,566
36,789
65,737
22,591
14,786
139,903
19,153
46,051
32,696
42,001
139,901
50,888
40,762
20,634
27,580
139,864
10,556
50,240
50,348
28,735
139,879
6,294
44,790
54,911
33,894
139,889
3,891
43,848
56,475
35,664
139,878
24
%
1%
2%
4%
12%
29%
31%
20%
100%
28%
47%
15%
10%
100%
15%
33%
23%
29%
100%
38%
28%
14%
19%
100%
8%
36%
36%
20%
100%
5%
32%
39%
24%
100%
3%
32%
40%
25%
100%
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
7a. Practicum, internship, field
experience, co-op experience,
or clinical assignment
Response Options
INTERN04
(EEE)
Have not decided
Do not plan to do
Plan to do
Done
Count
Total
b.
Community service or
volunteer work
VOLNTR04
(EEE)
Have not decided
Do not plan to do
Plan to do
Done
c.
Participate in a learning
community or some other
formal program where groups
of students take two or more
classes together
LRNCOM04
(EEE)
Have not decided
Do not plan to do
Plan to do
Done
d.
Worked on a research project
with a faculty member outside
of course or program
requirements
RESRCH04
(SFI)
Have not decided
Do not plan to do
Plan to do
Done
e.
Foreign language coursework
FORLNG04
(EEE)
Have not decided
Do not plan to do
Plan to do
Done
f.
Study abroad
STDABR04
(EEE)
Have not decided
Do not plan to do
Plan to do
Done
g.
Independent study or selfdesigned major
INDSTD04
(EEE)
Have not decided
Do not plan to do
Plan to do
Done
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
a
27
4
150
16
197
22
16
74
85
197
68
49
47
33
197
72
60
52
12
196
34
47
85
31
197
63
58
71
4
196
58
102
31
4
195
%
13%
2%
78%
7%
100%
14%
9%
37%
40%
100%
34%
25%
23%
18%
100%
36%
30%
27%
7%
100%
18%
26%
40%
16%
100%
33%
32%
33%
2%
100%
30%
51%
17%
2%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
1136
381
5510
605
7632
1025
516
3038
3052
7631
2294
2060
1706
1568
7628
2961
1933
2261
470
7625
1523
1934
2803
1369
7629
2390
2200
2831
205
7626
2540
3554
1241
291
7626
15%
5%
72%
8%
100%
14%
8%
40%
39%
100%
29%
28%
22%
21%
100%
38%
26%
30%
6%
100%
19%
24%
38%
19%
100%
31%
27%
39%
3%
100%
34%
46%
16%
4%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
2,351
711
14,495
1,315
18,872
2,434
1,217
7,583
7,633
18,867
6,190
5,376
3,859
3,432
18,857
7,557
4,402
6,067
838
18,864
3,343
4,698
6,096
4,723
18,860
5,429
4,703
8,317
410
18,859
6,286
9,315
2,688
567
18,856
%
13%
4%
76%
7%
100%
14%
8%
39%
39%
100%
32%
29%
21%
18%
100%
40%
24%
31%
5%
100%
18%
26%
33%
23%
100%
30%
27%
40%
2%
100%
33%
49%
14%
3%
100%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
16,905
5,072
101,678
9,886
133,541
18,062
8,270
53,434
53,742
133,508
46,620
35,355
29,720
21,766
133,461
54,408
32,154
40,643
6,248
133,453
23,936
34,215
42,493
32,840
133,484
38,420
33,590
58,377
3,081
133,468
45,994
63,016
20,624
3,825
133,459
%
14%
4%
75%
7%
100%
15%
8%
40%
38%
100%
34%
27%
22%
17%
100%
40%
25%
30%
5%
100%
19%
27%
32%
22%
100%
30%
27%
41%
3%
100%
34%
47%
16%
3%
100%
Texas Tech
Count
23
66
74
166
329
18
52
43
216
329
37
176
27
89
329
47
165
51
66
329
16
130
27
156
329
48
214
27
40
329
32
196
39
62
329
%
7%
21%
23%
50%
100%
6%
17%
13%
63%
100%
11%
55%
8%
26%
100%
14%
51%
15%
20%
100%
5%
40%
8%
47%
100%
15%
66%
8%
11%
100%
10%
59%
12%
20%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
1009
1766
2950
5193
10918
1155
1814
1725
6222
10916
1692
5325
1032
2865
10914
2037
5618
1481
1777
10913
1191
4899
1258
3566
10914
1697
7127
1119
968
10911
1748
6438
1165
1564
10915
%
9%
17%
28%
46%
100%
10%
18%
16%
57%
100%
15%
50%
9%
25%
100%
19%
51%
14%
17%
100%
10%
41%
12%
37%
100%
15%
63%
12%
11%
100%
15%
60%
11%
14%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
1,588
3,551
4,511
11,611
21,261
1,942
3,430
2,697
13,182
21,251
2,795
11,561
1,452
5,438
21,246
3,296
11,072
2,580
4,293
21,241
1,545
8,669
1,594
9,446
21,254
2,511
13,737
1,733
3,270
21,251
2,470
13,425
1,668
3,688
21,251
%
8%
17%
24%
52%
100%
10%
17%
14%
60%
100%
14%
54%
7%
25%
100%
16%
52%
13%
19%
100%
8%
41%
8%
43%
100%
12%
65%
9%
14%
100%
13%
62%
9%
17%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
9,953
21,844
28,620
78,228
138,645
12,457
21,693
17,748
86,723
138,621
19,199
72,583
9,995
36,767
138,544
21,509
73,942
15,210
27,909
138,570
10,764
58,387
10,703
58,742
138,596
16,294
89,103
10,389
22,774
138,560
15,808
85,414
10,787
26,549
138,558
25
%
8%
16%
23%
53%
100%
10%
17%
14%
59%
100%
15%
52%
8%
25%
100%
17%
52%
12%
19%
100%
8%
42%
9%
41%
100%
13%
64%
9%
14%
100%
13%
61%
9%
17%
100%
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
h.
Culminating senior
experience (capstone course,
senior project or thesis,
comprehensive exam, etc.)
SNRX04
8a. Quality of relationships with
ENVSTU
(SCE)
other students
(EEE)
Response Options
Count
Have not decided
Do not plan to do
Plan to do
Done
Total
1 Unfriendly,
Unsupportive, Sense of
Alienation
2
3
4
5
6
7 Friendly, Supportive,
Sense of Belonging
Total
b.
Quality of relationships with
faculty members
ENVFAC
(SCE)
1 Unavailable, Unhelpful,
Unsympathetic
2
Quality of relationships with
administrative personnel and
offices
ENVADM
(SCE)
39%
19%
40%
2%
100%
2
7
12
21
37
54
61
1%
4%
6%
11%
20%
29%
29%
194
100%
2
7
1%
4%
Count
%
3271 43%
1047 14%
3185 41%
127
2%
7630 100%
78
202
397
962
1521
2161
2286
1%
3%
5%
14%
21%
28%
27%
7607 100%
79
242
1%
3%
Carnegie Peers
Count
%
7,667 40%
1,984 11%
8,915 48%
291
2%
18,857 100%
219
459
965
2,225
3,916
5,695
5,335
1%
2%
5%
12%
21%
30%
28%
18,814 100%
177
521
1%
3%
NSSE 2007
Count
%
52,297 40%
14,154 12%
65,173 47%
1,833
2%
133,457 100%
Texas Tech
Count
%
42
90
104
93
329
13%
27%
32%
28%
100%
1%
2%
5%
12%
21%
30%
28%
2
5
20
24
66
101
110
1%
1%
8%
7%
20%
31%
32%
133,158 100%
328
100%
4
6
1%
2%
1,357
3,199
6,397
14,906
27,055
40,436
39,808
976
2,881
1%
3%
Selected Peers
Count
%
1552 14%
3140 30%
3378 31%
2844 25%
10914 100%
83
238
497
1155
2024
3086
3802
1%
2%
6%
12%
19%
28%
32%
10885 100%
129
252
1%
3%
Carnegie Peers
Count
%
2,264 11%
5,672 26%
5,985 30%
7,321 33%
21,242 100%
198
487
982
2,155
4,312
6,389
6,681
1%
2%
5%
11%
21%
30%
31%
21,204 100%
210
522
1%
2%
NSSE 2007
Count
%
14,022 11%
35,010 27%
40,110 29%
49,416 32%
138,558 100%
1,145
2,859
5,840
13,689
27,272
41,855
45,657
1%
2%
5%
11%
20%
30%
31%
138,317 100%
1,167
2,979
1%
3%
23
12%
528
7%
1,295
7%
7,620
6%
24
8%
591
6%
1,162
6%
6,335
5%
4
45
24%
1454
21%
3,601
19%
21,873
18%
50
16%
1493
15%
2,894
14%
16,545
13%
5
44
23%
2136
28%
5,354
28%
36,421
28%
88
28%
2547
25%
5,526
26%
32,218
24%
6
7 Available, Helpful,
Sympathetic
43
30
21%
16%
1886
1284
25%
16%
5,140
2,727
27%
15%
38,842
24,553
27%
17%
90
66
25%
20%
3123
2750
28%
22%
6,381
4,505
29%
21%
43,313
35,793
30%
24%
194
100%
133,166 100%
328
100%
5
18
2%
9%
1 Unhelpful,
Inconsiderate, Rigid
2
7609 100%
18,815 100%
10885 100%
21,200 100%
138,350 100%
257
526
4%
7%
660
1,305
4%
7%
3,811
7,942
3%
7%
22
26
8%
8%
525
850
6%
9%
1,227
1,973
5%
9%
6,760
11,235
5%
9%
3
23
12%
855
12%
2,327
12%
14,488
12%
38
12%
1180
12%
2,580
12%
15,711
12%
4
52
27%
1757
24%
4,571
24%
30,706
24%
80
23%
2206
21%
4,610
22%
28,930
21%
5
37
19%
1722
22%
4,388
23%
32,240
23%
70
21%
2241
20%
4,501
21%
29,906
21%
6
7 Helpful, Considerate,
Flexible
34
25
18%
13%
1426
1059
19%
13%
3,408
2,140
18%
11%
26,055
17,852
19%
13%
51
41
15%
12%
2046
1833
18%
15%
3,697
2,607
17%
12%
25,626
20,107
18%
14%
194
100%
133,094 100%
328
100%
Total
a
76
37
79
4
196
Selected Peers
3
Total
c.
%
Seniors
7602 100%
18,799 100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
10881 100%
21,195 100%
138,275 100%
26
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
9a. Preparing for class (studying,
reading, writing, doing
homework or lab work,
analyzing data, rehearsing,
and other academic activities)
ACADPR01
(LAC)
Response Options
Count
0 hr/wk
1-5 hr/wk
6-10 hr/wk
11-15 hr/wk
16-20 hr/wk
21-25 hr/wk
26-30 hr/wk
30+ hr/wk
Total
b.
Working for pay on campus
WORKON01 0 hr/wk
1-5 hr/wk
6-10 hr/wk
11-15 hr/wk
16-20 hr/wk
21-25 hr/wk
26-30 hr/wk
30+ hr/wk
c.
Working for pay off campus
WORKOF01
0 hr/wk
1-5 hr/wk
6-10 hr/wk
11-15 hr/wk
16-20 hr/wk
21-25 hr/wk
26-30 hr/wk
30+ hr/wk
d.
Participating in co-curricular
activities (organizations,
campus publications, student
government, fraternity or
sorority, intercollegiate or
intramural sports, etc.)
COCURR01
(EEE)
0 hr/wk
1-5 hr/wk
6-10 hr/wk
11-15 hr/wk
16-20 hr/wk
21-25 hr/wk
26-30 hr/wk
30+ hr/wk
Total
Total
Total
a
%
Selected Peers
Count
%
Carnegie Peers
Count
%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
%
Texas Tech
Count
%
Selected Peers
Count
%
Carnegie Peers
Count
%
NSSE 2007
Count
%
1
0%
33
0%
52
0%
385
0%
5
2%
38
0%
74
0%
457
0%
49
57
40
20
14
6
7
194
146
5
6
13
13
5
1
5
194
149
8
3
8
10
6
2
8
194
55
74
29
18
8
5
2
3
194
23%
31%
21%
10%
7%
3%
4%
100%
77%
3%
3%
6%
6%
3%
0%
1%
100%
76%
4%
2%
4%
5%
3%
1%
4%
100%
28%
35%
16%
10%
4%
3%
1%
2%
100%
1510
2113
1548
1093
610
310
336
7553
6207
138
256
347
399
101
40
62
7550
4803
308
324
361
501
450
306
497
7550
3052
2274
1065
513
310
137
70
134
7555
20%
27%
21%
15%
8%
4%
5%
100%
84%
2%
3%
4%
5%
1%
0%
1%
100%
64%
4%
4%
5%
7%
6%
4%
6%
100%
41%
30%
14%
7%
4%
2%
1%
2%
100%
2,856
4,941
4,198
3,154
1,801
903
793
18,698
14,838
553
1,277
1,020
699
135
59
113
18,694
13,240
772
875
922
1,049
741
407
679
18,685
6,506
6,287
2,732
1,384
833
419
168
367
18,696
17%
28%
22%
16%
9%
5%
4%
100%
80%
3%
6%
5%
4%
1%
0%
1%
100%
69%
4%
5%
5%
6%
4%
2%
4%
100%
38%
32%
14%
7%
4%
2%
1%
2%
100%
20,353
34,398
29,469
22,226
12,993
6,694
5,857
132,375
100,154
6,324
12,458
7,508
4,050
852
327
700
132,373
90,132
6,326
6,667
6,602
7,441
5,222
3,185
6,781
132,356
46,901
44,622
18,670
9,759
5,861
2,921
1,315
2,341
132,390
17%
27%
22%
16%
9%
5%
4%
100%
79%
4%
7%
5%
3%
1%
0%
1%
100%
65%
4%
5%
5%
6%
5%
3%
7%
100%
39%
32%
13%
7%
4%
2%
1%
2%
100%
57
95
79
40
20
9
22
327
242
8
16
21
18
9
1
12
327
157
15
20
17
26
31
21
40
327
105
116
59
22
15
3
3
4
327
18%
30%
23%
12%
6%
3%
7%
100%
75%
2%
4%
6%
5%
3%
0%
4%
100%
47%
4%
6%
5%
7%
9%
8%
14%
100%
35%
35%
17%
6%
5%
1%
1%
1%
100%
2079
2862
2061
1568
927
573
726
10834
8341
223
426
495
816
220
85
229
10835
4547
450
575
563
942
737
631
2385
10830
5645
2995
1015
478
295
151
67
193
10839
19%
26%
19%
15%
8%
6%
7%
100%
77%
2%
4%
4%
7%
2%
1%
2%
100%
41%
4%
5%
5%
10%
7%
6%
22%
100%
52%
27%
10%
5%
3%
1%
1%
2%
100%
3,773
5,483
4,179
3,232
1,937
1,076
1,353
21,107
15,046
750
1,520
1,388
1,439
402
181
382
21,108
9,822
1,019
1,272
1,376
1,950
1,529
1,041
3,102
21,111
9,011
6,650
2,552
1,227
726
387
194
362
21,109
19%
26%
19%
15%
9%
5%
7%
100%
73%
3%
6%
6%
8%
2%
1%
2%
100%
44%
5%
6%
6%
9%
7%
5%
17%
100%
46%
30%
11%
5%
3%
2%
1%
2%
100%
23,829
35,875
27,141
21,320
12,594
7,573
8,990
137,779
96,026
7,226
12,653
9,081
7,754
2,088
927
2,017
137,772
58,963
7,250
9,025
9,375
12,909
10,144
7,000
23,093
137,759
59,848
41,349
16,349
8,138
5,264
2,729
1,365
2,739
137,781
19%
26%
19%
15%
9%
5%
6%
100%
73%
4%
7%
6%
6%
2%
1%
2%
100%
41%
5%
6%
7%
10%
8%
5%
19%
100%
47%
29%
11%
5%
3%
2%
1%
2%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
27
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
Response Options
e.
Relaxing and socializing
(watching TV, partying, etc.)
SOCIAL05
0 hr/wk
1-5 hr/wk
6-10 hr/wk
11-15 hr/wk
16-20 hr/wk
21-25 hr/wk
26-30 hr/wk
30+ hr/wk
f.
Providing care for dependents
living with you (parents,
children, spouse, etc.)
CAREDE01
0 hr/wk
1-5 hr/wk
6-10 hr/wk
11-15 hr/wk
16-20 hr/wk
21-25 hr/wk
26-30 hr/wk
30+ hr/wk
g.
Commuting to class (driving,
walking, etc.)
COMMUTE
0 hr/wk
1-5 hr/wk
6-10 hr/wk
11-15 hr/wk
16-20 hr/wk
21-25 hr/wk
26-30 hr/wk
30+ hr/wk
10a. Spending significant amounts
ENVSCHOL
(LAC)
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
ENVSUPRT
(SCE)
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
Count
Total
Total
Total
of time studying and on
academic work
Total
b.
Providing the support you
need to help you succeed
academically
Total
a
2
44
59
35
28
8
5
12
193
164
18
5
3
1
1
0
2
194
16
145
21
4
6
0
0
2
194
4
49
84
52
189
11
46
84
48
189
%
1%
23%
30%
18%
14%
5%
3%
6%
100%
84%
9%
3%
2%
1%
1%
0%
0%
100%
9%
72%
12%
2%
4%
0%
0%
1%
100%
2%
27%
42%
29%
100%
5%
25%
43%
26%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
90
2015
2285
1388
825
394
188
354
7539
5301
1025
446
242
146
62
39
280
7541
629
4982
1200
401
164
76
32
58
7542
138
1437
3467
2412
7454
249
1611
3386
2207
7453
1%
26%
30%
19%
11%
5%
2%
5%
100%
71%
13%
6%
3%
2%
1%
0%
3%
100%
7%
66%
16%
6%
2%
1%
0%
1%
100%
2%
21%
45%
32%
100%
4%
23%
44%
29%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
143
3,873
5,558
3,912
2,426
1,191
549
1,005
18,657
14,573
2,096
825
405
226
91
50
389
18,655
2,301
12,392
2,593
767
321
106
54
126
18,660
305
3,303
8,925
5,904
18,437
611
4,075
8,425
5,325
18,436
%
1%
20%
29%
21%
13%
6%
3%
6%
100%
77%
12%
4%
2%
1%
1%
0%
2%
100%
11%
67%
14%
4%
2%
1%
0%
1%
100%
2%
19%
49%
30%
100%
4%
23%
46%
28%
100%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
1,354
30,517
38,992
26,618
16,269
7,869
3,635
6,879
132,133
100,057
15,804
5,939
3,023
1,779
801
540
4,152
132,095
22,401
85,255
15,807
4,692
1,917
782
364
943
132,161
2,237
22,278
62,114
44,235
130,864
3,507
25,658
58,981
42,700
130,846
%
1%
23%
29%
20%
13%
6%
3%
6%
100%
72%
13%
5%
3%
2%
1%
0%
4%
100%
13%
64%
14%
4%
2%
1%
0%
1%
100%
2%
19%
48%
32%
100%
3%
22%
45%
30%
100%
Texas Tech
Count
5
77
93
66
42
19
7
16
325
234
30
13
11
7
2
3
25
325
3
250
50
15
3
2
0
2
325
9
63
154
96
322
17
89
147
69
322
%
2%
24%
29%
21%
12%
6%
2%
5%
100%
70%
10%
4%
4%
3%
1%
1%
8%
100%
1%
77%
16%
5%
1%
1%
0%
1%
100%
3%
21%
47%
29%
100%
6%
30%
43%
21%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
184
3726
3355
1744
907
358
201
352
10827
5391
1337
828
495
408
221
182
1962
10824
644
6731
2273
653
255
74
39
159
10828
290
2008
4864
3591
10753
615
2788
4603
2745
10751
%
2%
32%
31%
17%
9%
3%
2%
4%
100%
53%
12%
8%
5%
4%
2%
1%
15%
100%
4%
62%
22%
6%
3%
1%
0%
1%
100%
3%
20%
46%
31%
100%
6%
28%
43%
23%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
204
5,817
6,546
4,043
2,251
910
441
860
21,072
13,625
2,539
1,291
718
569
274
185
1,875
21,076
1,487
14,243
3,657
971
356
109
65
191
21,079
503
3,967
9,743
6,731
20,944
1,190
5,785
9,209
4,757
20,941
%
1%
28%
31%
19%
10%
4%
2%
4%
100%
62%
12%
7%
4%
3%
2%
1%
10%
100%
6%
67%
18%
5%
2%
1%
0%
1%
100%
3%
19%
46%
32%
100%
6%
28%
44%
22%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
1,678
39,818
42,852
25,117
14,395
5,966
2,796
4,963
137,585
86,843
16,580
8,206
4,707
3,674
1,850
1,436
14,266
137,562
14,102
89,183
23,060
6,575
2,251
768
405
1,267
137,611
3,008
24,369
63,017
46,291
136,685
6,523
33,107
60,197
36,858
136,685
28
%
1%
29%
31%
18%
10%
4%
2%
4%
100%
61%
13%
7%
4%
3%
2%
1%
11%
100%
8%
64%
19%
5%
2%
1%
0%
1%
100%
3%
19%
46%
32%
100%
6%
26%
44%
24%
100%
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
Response Options
c.
Encouraging contact among
students from different
economic, social, and racial or
ethnic backgrounds
ENVDIVRS
(EEE)
d.
Helping you cope with your
non-academic responsibilities
(work, family, etc.)
ENVNACAD Very little
(SCE)
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
e.
Providing the support you
need to thrive socially
ENVSOCAL
(SCE)
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
f.
Attending campus events and
activities (special speakers,
cultural performances, athletic
events, etc.)
ENVEVENT
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
g.
Using computers in academic
work
ENVCOMPT Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
Count
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
11a. Acquiring a broad general
GNGENLED
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
GNWORK
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
education
Total
b.
Acquiring job or work-related
knowledge and skills
Total
a
27
63
59
40
189
56
72
40
21
189
33
60
63
33
189
15
45
78
51
189
7
28
67
87
189
6
36
78
65
185
18
46
66
55
185
%
14%
33%
30%
23%
100%
31%
37%
20%
12%
100%
18%
32%
33%
18%
100%
9%
24%
40%
27%
100%
3%
17%
36%
44%
100%
3%
19%
42%
35%
100%
10%
26%
36%
29%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
997
2452
2386
1613
7448
2003
2910
1719
815
7447
1260
2790
2349
1051
7450
701
2041
2755
1952
7449
164
1025
2551
3712
7452
203
1390
3308
2412
7313
872
2181
2546
1712
7311
14%
33%
32%
21%
100%
28%
39%
22%
10%
100%
17%
38%
31%
14%
100%
10%
28%
37%
25%
100%
2%
14%
35%
49%
100%
3%
20%
45%
33%
100%
13%
30%
34%
23%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
2,534
6,142
5,876
3,872
18,424
5,082
7,301
4,223
1,817
18,423
3,088
6,799
6,010
2,529
18,426
1,422
4,831
7,333
4,848
18,434
348
2,449
6,400
9,244
18,441
403
3,073
8,209
6,484
18,169
1,958
5,393
6,433
4,377
18,161
%
14%
34%
32%
20%
100%
28%
40%
22%
10%
100%
17%
37%
32%
13%
100%
8%
26%
39%
26%
100%
2%
13%
35%
49%
100%
2%
18%
46%
34%
100%
11%
30%
35%
24%
100%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
16,217
41,848
42,981
29,734
130,780
32,447
52,307
32,230
13,763
130,747
20,614
48,902
43,116
18,101
130,733
10,444
32,630
51,533
36,186
130,793
2,608
17,348
45,953
64,925
130,834
2,907
20,703
57,608
47,823
129,041
12,297
37,907
46,659
32,127
128,990
%
13%
33%
32%
22%
100%
27%
40%
23%
10%
100%
17%
38%
32%
13%
100%
10%
27%
38%
25%
100%
2%
13%
35%
50%
100%
3%
17%
45%
35%
100%
10%
30%
36%
24%
100%
Texas Tech
Count
72
125
86
39
322
138
111
56
17
322
79
130
82
30
321
34
107
118
63
322
8
34
94
186
322
5
40
162
111
318
20
64
117
117
318
%
22%
40%
28%
11%
100%
44%
35%
17%
5%
100%
27%
40%
24%
9%
100%
11%
34%
35%
19%
100%
3%
11%
29%
57%
100%
2%
14%
50%
34%
100%
8%
21%
35%
35%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
1976
3633
3126
2002
10737
4170
3810
1860
904
10744
2813
4171
2609
1142
10735
1756
3524
3506
1953
10739
182
951
3110
6507
10750
308
1544
4194
4604
10650
724
2073
3504
4344
10645
%
19%
34%
29%
18%
100%
42%
35%
16%
7%
100%
27%
40%
24%
10%
100%
16%
33%
33%
18%
100%
2%
9%
29%
60%
100%
3%
15%
40%
42%
100%
8%
21%
33%
38%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
4,235
7,537
5,828
3,325
20,925
8,506
7,789
3,271
1,363
20,929
5,360
8,491
5,200
1,868
20,919
2,660
6,732
7,466
4,073
20,931
338
1,912
6,021
12,671
20,942
517
2,999
8,226
8,998
20,740
1,469
4,415
7,071
7,781
20,736
%
20%
36%
28%
16%
100%
40%
37%
16%
7%
100%
25%
41%
25%
9%
100%
13%
32%
35%
20%
100%
1%
9%
29%
60%
100%
2%
15%
40%
43%
100%
7%
21%
34%
38%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
25,085
48,556
38,916
24,008
136,565
50,626
51,763
23,970
10,190
136,549
33,330
55,149
35,102
12,903
136,484
18,157
42,120
48,940
27,327
136,544
2,314
12,815
40,080
81,463
136,672
3,337
18,419
51,593
62,070
135,419
8,633
27,827
45,988
52,943
135,391
29
%
19%
35%
28%
17%
100%
40%
37%
17%
7%
100%
26%
40%
25%
9%
100%
14%
32%
35%
19%
100%
2%
10%
29%
60%
100%
3%
15%
39%
44%
100%
7%
21%
34%
38%
100%
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
Response Options
c.
Writing clearly and
effectively
GNWRITE
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
d.
Speaking clearly and
effectively
GNSPEAK
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
e.
Thinking critically and
analytically
GNANALY
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
f.
Analyzing quantitative
problems
GNQUANT
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
g.
Using computing and
information technology
GNCMPTS
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
h.
Working effectively with
others
GNOTHERS
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
i.
Voting in local, state, or
national elections
GNCITIZN
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
Count
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
Total
a
12
48
77
48
185
20
55
74
36
185
8
39
78
60
185
14
47
72
52
185
8
44
65
68
185
14
43
68
60
185
56
62
38
27
183
%
5%
28%
42%
25%
100%
11%
31%
39%
19%
100%
4%
22%
42%
33%
100%
6%
26%
40%
28%
100%
4%
24%
35%
37%
100%
7%
24%
37%
32%
100%
31%
35%
20%
15%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
544
1958
2858
1955
7315
810
2188
2637
1677
7312
225
1227
3071
2791
7314
455
1853
2896
2107
7311
407
1552
2771
2584
7314
467
1856
2756
2237
7316
2285
2352
1617
962
7216
8%
28%
38%
26%
100%
12%
30%
36%
22%
100%
3%
18%
42%
38%
100%
7%
25%
40%
28%
100%
6%
22%
38%
35%
100%
7%
27%
37%
29%
100%
31%
33%
23%
14%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
1,053
4,259
7,450
5,396
18,158
1,962
5,610
6,514
4,070
18,156
485
2,950
7,660
7,067
18,162
1,116
4,613
7,351
5,070
18,150
1,174
3,990
6,694
6,302
18,160
1,124
4,692
7,011
5,340
18,167
6,836
5,724
3,468
1,945
17,973
%
6%
24%
41%
28%
100%
11%
31%
35%
22%
100%
3%
17%
43%
38%
100%
7%
26%
41%
27%
100%
7%
22%
37%
34%
100%
7%
26%
38%
29%
100%
38%
33%
19%
11%
100%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
6,148
28,584
53,310
40,978
129,020
11,049
36,808
48,813
32,336
129,006
2,921
19,985
54,133
51,982
129,021
7,802
33,305
52,040
35,788
128,935
7,484
29,225
48,633
43,668
129,010
6,520
31,259
50,930
40,294
129,003
47,861
41,621
24,586
13,544
127,612
%
5%
24%
41%
30%
100%
9%
29%
37%
24%
100%
3%
16%
42%
39%
100%
6%
26%
41%
28%
100%
6%
22%
38%
34%
100%
6%
25%
39%
30%
100%
37%
32%
20%
11%
100%
Texas Tech
Count
14
86
122
96
318
19
82
131
86
318
7
38
130
143
318
11
68
124
115
318
9
49
129
131
318
9
59
113
137
318
101
112
64
39
316
%
5%
29%
38%
28%
100%
6%
28%
41%
25%
100%
3%
13%
41%
44%
100%
3%
21%
38%
37%
100%
3%
16%
42%
40%
100%
3%
22%
36%
40%
100%
33%
35%
20%
12%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
545
2268
4050
3783
10646
754
2485
3887
3521
10647
260
1233
3881
5274
10648
558
2115
3914
4054
10641
410
1516
3589
5131
10646
483
2019
3626
4518
10646
3623
3379
2047
1517
10566
%
6%
22%
38%
34%
100%
8%
24%
37%
31%
100%
3%
12%
37%
48%
100%
6%
21%
36%
37%
100%
4%
15%
34%
47%
100%
5%
21%
34%
39%
100%
34%
32%
20%
14%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
930
4,431
8,102
7,265
20,728
1,386
5,068
7,852
6,425
20,731
416
2,436
7,729
10,147
20,728
1,060
4,479
7,670
7,509
20,718
847
3,502
7,078
9,302
20,729
850
4,090
7,461
8,328
20,729
7,908
6,627
3,710
2,333
20,578
%
5%
21%
39%
34%
100%
7%
25%
38%
31%
100%
2%
12%
37%
49%
100%
5%
22%
37%
36%
100%
4%
17%
34%
45%
100%
4%
20%
36%
39%
100%
39%
32%
18%
11%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
5,546
26,782
51,759
51,319
135,406
7,929
30,775
50,979
45,711
135,394
2,518
15,071
49,297
68,519
135,405
7,030
30,189
49,461
48,648
135,328
5,386
23,545
46,856
59,610
135,397
4,846
24,206
49,471
56,848
135,371
49,611
43,353
24,991
16,483
134,438
30
%
5%
21%
38%
36%
100%
7%
24%
37%
32%
100%
2%
12%
37%
49%
100%
5%
22%
36%
36%
100%
4%
17%
34%
45%
100%
4%
19%
36%
40%
100%
37%
32%
19%
12%
100%
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
Response Options
j.
Learning effectively on your
own
GNINQ
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
k.
Understanding yourself
GNSELF
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
l.
Understanding people of
other racial and ethnic
backgrounds
GNDIVERS
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
m. Solving complex real-world
GNPROBSV
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
GNETHICS
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
Count
Total
Total
Total
problems
Total
n.
Developing a personal code
of values and ethics
o.
Contributing to the welfare
of your community
p.
Developing a deepened sense
of spirituality
Total
GNCOMMUN Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
Total
GNSPIRIT
Very little
Some
Quite a bit
Very much
Total
a
9
52
77
45
183
25
41
76
41
183
25
63
60
35
183
24
61
62
36
183
21
57
64
41
183
37
62
52
32
183
61
51
40
31
183
%
4%
29%
43%
23%
100%
14%
24%
41%
21%
100%
14%
34%
33%
19%
100%
12%
36%
33%
19%
100%
12%
32%
35%
21%
100%
20%
36%
28%
17%
100%
32%
28%
23%
16%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
424
1769
3089
1938
7220
897
1925
2555
1844
7221
1020
2275
2375
1543
7213
838
2375
2546
1454
7213
1142
2117
2319
1637
7215
1552
2536
2017
1111
7216
2845
2000
1408
962
7215
6%
26%
41%
27%
100%
13%
27%
35%
25%
100%
14%
31%
33%
21%
100%
13%
33%
35%
20%
100%
17%
29%
32%
22%
100%
23%
35%
28%
15%
100%
41%
27%
19%
13%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
1,072
4,603
7,778
4,517
17,970
2,178
5,047
6,445
4,300
17,970
2,591
6,018
5,820
3,536
17,965
2,161
6,151
6,309
3,349
17,970
2,669
5,441
5,753
4,102
17,965
3,478
6,272
5,226
2,987
17,963
6,923
4,664
3,484
2,887
17,958
%
6%
26%
43%
25%
100%
13%
28%
35%
24%
100%
15%
33%
32%
19%
100%
13%
34%
35%
19%
100%
16%
31%
32%
22%
100%
21%
36%
28%
15%
100%
41%
26%
18%
15%
100%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
6,790
32,035
56,444
32,384
127,653
14,014
34,691
46,641
32,281
127,627
17,192
41,690
42,586
26,140
127,608
14,251
43,182
45,854
24,325
127,612
17,232
37,700
42,749
29,941
127,622
23,084
44,598
38,326
21,583
127,591
46,150
35,387
25,988
20,058
127,583
%
6%
25%
43%
25%
100%
12%
28%
36%
25%
100%
14%
32%
33%
21%
100%
12%
34%
35%
19%
100%
15%
30%
33%
22%
100%
20%
36%
29%
15%
100%
39%
28%
19%
14%
100%
Texas Tech
Count
13
73
128
102
316
34
82
112
88
316
61
115
81
59
316
31
85
121
79
316
43
94
104
75
316
69
108
93
46
316
161
89
36
30
316
%
5%
25%
39%
32%
100%
12%
27%
34%
27%
100%
20%
38%
25%
17%
100%
10%
28%
37%
24%
100%
14%
30%
33%
22%
100%
23%
36%
28%
13%
100%
53%
28%
11%
8%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
682
2128
4105
3655
10570
1415
2697
3351
3107
10570
1555
3305
3253
2449
10562
1188
2944
3590
2844
10566
1753
2723
3093
2995
10564
2240
3402
2808
2115
10565
5058
2582
1520
1399
10559
%
7%
20%
39%
33%
100%
14%
26%
31%
28%
100%
14%
31%
32%
23%
100%
12%
29%
34%
26%
100%
18%
27%
29%
26%
100%
22%
34%
26%
18%
100%
51%
23%
13%
12%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
1,236
4,361
8,385
6,601
20,583
2,657
5,436
6,745
5,743
20,581
3,293
7,019
6,172
4,087
20,571
2,215
6,093
7,163
5,109
20,580
3,408
5,653
6,032
5,483
20,576
4,281
6,838
5,504
3,953
20,576
9,911
4,789
2,826
3,044
20,570
%
6%
21%
40%
32%
100%
14%
26%
32%
28%
100%
16%
34%
30%
20%
100%
11%
29%
35%
25%
100%
17%
27%
29%
27%
100%
21%
34%
26%
19%
100%
49%
22%
13%
16%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
7,581
27,065
54,588
45,261
134,495
15,251
33,394
45,199
40,627
134,471
20,114
44,013
41,322
28,982
134,431
13,997
39,053
48,145
33,281
134,476
19,520
36,337
41,408
37,200
134,465
25,446
44,239
37,816
26,949
134,450
60,382
33,683
20,709
19,647
134,421
31
%
6%
20%
40%
33%
100%
13%
26%
33%
29%
100%
15%
33%
31%
22%
100%
11%
29%
35%
25%
100%
16%
28%
30%
26%
100%
21%
34%
27%
19%
100%
49%
24%
14%
13%
100%
NSSE 2007 Engagement Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
12. Overall, how would you
Response Options
ADVISE
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
ENTIREXP
Poor
Fair
Good
Excellent
SAMECOLL
Definitely no
Probably no
Probably yes
Definitely yes
evaluate the quality of
academic advising you have
received at your institution?
Count
Total
13. How would you evaluate your
entire educational experience
at this institution?
Total
14. If you could start over again,
would you go to the same
institution you are now
attending?
Total
a
5
39
84
54
182
4
20
89
69
182
7
15
68
92
182
%
2%
22%
47%
29%
100%
2%
12%
50%
37%
100%
4%
9%
38%
49%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
419
6%
1350 20%
3297 46%
2152 28%
7218 100%
132
2%
854 14%
3745 52%
2487 32%
7218 100%
270
4%
829 13%
2833 39%
3287 44%
7219 100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
%
1,257
7%
3,605 20%
8,286 45%
4,859 27%
18,007 100%
346
2%
2,171 13%
9,291 51%
6,205 34%
18,013 100%
772
5%
2,138 12%
7,265 40%
7,843 43%
18,018 100%
Seniors
NSSE 2007
Count
%
6,976
6%
22,663 19%
59,369 46%
38,838 29%
127,846 100%
2,271
2%
13,949 12%
64,840 52%
46,818 34%
127,878 100%
5,392
4%
15,221 12%
50,945 40%
56,299 43%
127,857 100%
Texas Tech
Count
40
64
141
70
315
8
25
164
119
316
17
31
107
161
316
%
14%
20%
45%
22%
100%
4%
9%
50%
37%
100%
7%
9%
34%
50%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
%
1163 12%
2209 23%
4118 39%
3095 27%
10585 100%
246
3%
1309 13%
5077 49%
3954 34%
10586 100%
517
5%
1298 13%
4077 40%
4689 42%
10581 100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
%
2,541 12%
4,931 24%
8,091 40%
5,044 25%
20,607 100%
479
2%
2,637 13%
10,073 49%
7,421 36%
20,610 100%
1,127
6%
2,791 13%
7,947 39%
8,740 42%
20,605 100%
NSSE 2007
Count
%
13,289 11%
27,874 22%
53,416 40%
40,081 28%
134,660 100%
2,844
2%
15,150 12%
63,926 48%
52,754 37%
134,674 100%
7,112
5%
17,315 13%
51,608 39%
58,599 43%
134,634 100%
IPEDS: 229115
32
NSSE 2007 Background Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
Response Options
15. Age
AGE
19 or younger
20-23
24-29
30-39
40-55
Over 55
16. Sex
SEX
Male
Female
Count
Total
Total
17. Are you an international
student or foreign national?
INTERNAT
No
Yes
Total
18. Racial or ethnic identification
RACE05
19. What is your current
classification in college?
CLASS
20. Did you begin college at your
current institution or
elsewhere?
ENTER
a
American Indian or other
Native American
Asian, Asian American,
or Pacific Islander
Black or African
American
White (non-Hispanic)
Mexican or Mexican
American
Puerto Rican
Other Hispanic or Latino
Multiracial
Other
I prefer not to respond
Total
Freshman/first year
Sophomore
Junior
Senior
Unclassified
Total
Started here
Started elsewhere
Total
%
Selected Peers
Count
%
6257 86%
604
9%
165
3%
124
2%
70
1%
1
0%
7221 100%
2558 47%
4666 53%
7224 100%
6829 94%
384
6%
7213 100%
Seniors
Carnegie Peers
Count
%
16,242 88%
1,127
8%
312
2%
183
1%
120
1%
10
0%
17,994 100%
6,861 47%
11,171 53%
18,032 100%
17,144 95%
870
5%
18,014 100%
NSSE 2007
Count
167
10
2
0
2
0
181
70
112
182
174
7
181
93%
6%
1%
0%
1%
0%
100%
55%
45%
100%
97%
3%
100%
2
1%
162
2%
160
1%
946
7
4%
388
7%
1,136
6%
7,462
%
112,966 85%
7,998
8%
2,535
3%
2,342
2%
1,640
2%
130
0%
127,611 100%
44,390 44%
83,609 56%
127,999 100%
121,724 95%
6,125
5%
127,849 100%
Texas Tech
Count
%
Selected Peers
Count
%
36
0%
5402 53%
2278 22%
1550 14%
1154 10%
96
1%
10516 100%
3452 41%
7140 59%
10592 100%
10115 95%
474
5%
10589 100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
%
78
0%
13,937 64%
3,289 19%
1,557
9%
1,111
7%
101
1%
20,073 100%
7,940 46%
12,671 54%
20,611 100%
19,702 95%
905
5%
20,607 100%
NSSE 2007
Count
%
1
243
42
11
6
1
304
143
173
316
309
7
316
0%
76%
16%
5%
2%
0%
100%
55%
45%
100%
98%
2%
100%
417
0%
90,815 63%
19,321 18%
11,715 10%
9,609
8%
771
1%
132,648 100%
46,487 43%
88,140 57%
134,627 100%
128,719 95%
5,855
5%
134,574 100%
1%
2
1%
243
2%
245
1%
1,033
1%
7%
8
2%
409
5%
965
5%
6,300
6%
7
4%
316
7%
1,104
6%
7,804
7%
10
3%
489
6%
1,164
6%
7,904
6%
130
70%
3973
51%
12,747
71%
91,540
68%
239
75%
6095
53%
15,071
71%
98,129
68%
11
1
10
5
1
8
182
137
42
2
0
1
182
164
18
182
7%
0%
5%
2%
1%
5%
100%
76%
23%
1%
0%
0%
100%
90%
10%
100%
3,457
3%
1,065
1%
3,093
3%
3,099
3%
1,977
2%
7,407
6%
127,850 100%
110,115 82%
14,404 14%
1,781
2%
575
1%
968
1%
127,843 100%
116,705 90%
11,148 10%
127,853 100%
16
1
12
5
7
16
316
0
0
9
281
23
313
201
114
315
5%
0%
4%
2%
3%
6%
100%
0%
0%
3%
89%
8%
100%
62%
38%
100%
1040 15%
24
0%
552
8%
223
4%
102
1%
436
6%
7216 100%
5681 77%
1282 19%
157
3%
49
1%
46
1%
7215 100%
6272 86%
946 14%
7218 100%
439
3%
125
1%
487
3%
440
2%
298
1%
1,077
6%
18,013 100%
15,466 82%
2,185 15%
193
1%
78
1%
88
1%
18,010 100%
16,663 91%
1,350
9%
18,013 100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
1452 15%
31
0%
793
8%
254
3%
142
1%
674
7%
10582 100%
7
0%
45
0%
617
6%
9657 91%
245
3%
10571 100%
4618 46%
5971 54%
10589 100%
474
4%
93
1%
538
3%
391
2%
323
2%
1,331
6%
20,595 100%
10
0%
74
0%
895
5%
19,306 93%
309
2%
20,594 100%
12,336 55%
8,271 45%
20,607 100%
3,506
4%
940
1%
3,067
3%
2,728
2%
1,978
2%
8,947
7%
134,532 100%
126
0%
510
0%
6,115
5%
124,616 92%
3,087
3%
134,454 100%
80,000 55%
54,599 45%
134,599 100%
33
NSSE 2007 Background Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
21. Since graduating from high
school, which of the following
types of schools have you
attended other than the one
you are attending now? (Mark
all that apply.)
22. Thinking about this current
academic term, how would
you characterize your
enrollment?
23. Are you member of a
fraternity or sorority?
Variable
Response Options
VOTECH05
Vocational or technical
school
Community or junior
college
4-year college other than
this one
None
Other
Less than full-time
Full-time
Total
COMCOL05
FOURYR05
NONE05
OCOL1_05
ENRLMENT
FRATSORO
No
Yes
24. Are you a student-athlete on a
team sponsored by your
institution's athletics
department?
ATHLETE
No
Yes
25. What have most of your
grades been up to now at this
institution?
GRADES04
26. Which of the following best
describes where you are living
now while attending college?
LIVENOW
Count
Total
a
Total
C- or lower
C
C+
BB
B+
AA
Total
Dormitory or campus
housing
Residence, walking
distance
Residence, driving
distance
Fraternity or sorority
house
Total
%
Selected Peers
Count
%
Seniors
Carnegie Peers
Count
%
NSSE 2007
Count
%
Texas Tech
Count
%
Selected Peers
Count
%
Carnegie Peers
Count
%
NSSE 2007
Count
%
1
0%
216
2%
390
2%
3,875
3%
10
3%
1029
9%
1,154
6%
9,657
7%
39
17%
1332
15%
1,360
7%
10,428
8%
161
46%
6769
55%
7,407
36%
48,131
36%
8
141
2
4%
61%
1%
579
5242
194
7%
60%
2%
1,116
15,213
442
6%
70%
2%
9,058
105,500
3,512
7%
68%
3%
71
120
12
22%
32%
4%
2984
2532
399
25%
23%
4%
5,197
9,611
826
24%
38%
4%
33,723
62,340
5,575
24%
38%
4%
4
178
182
2%
98%
100%
330
5%
6885 95%
7215 100%
526
4%
17,479 96%
18,005 100%
4,452
5%
123,356 95%
127,808 100%
22
293
315
10%
90%
100%
1901 19%
8681 81%
10582 100%
2,655 16%
17,945 84%
20,600 100%
17,880 16%
116,596 84%
134,476 100%
143
39
182
171
11
182
80%
20%
100%
93%
7%
100%
6513 91%
697
9%
7210 100%
6815 96%
393
4%
7208 100%
15,685 88%
2,310 12%
17,995 100%
16,823 94%
1,168
6%
17,991 100%
115,070 91%
12,667
9%
127,737 100%
113,685 92%
14,023
8%
127,708 100%
235
79
314
310
4
314
76%
24%
100%
99%
1%
100%
9588 90%
996 10%
10584 100%
10362 98%
220
2%
10582 100%
17,884 88%
2,712 12%
20,596 100%
19,857 97%
733
3%
20,590 100%
118,600 89%
15,889 11%
134,489 100%
126,359 96%
8,105
4%
134,464 100%
8
6
11
21
26
36
36
38
182
4%
4%
6%
12%
14%
20%
20%
19%
100%
171
2%
383
5%
626
9%
722 10%
1445 19%
1246 17%
1099 16%
1495 21%
7187 100%
327
2%
735
5%
1,099
7%
1,590
9%
3,615 20%
3,413 19%
3,275 17%
3,899 22%
17,953 100%
2,364
2%
5,378
5%
7,628
7%
10,884
9%
26,847 21%
24,928 19%
22,597 17%
26,567 21%
127,193 100%
0
10
9
26
76
61
50
82
314
0%
4%
4%
10%
25%
18%
15%
25%
100%
36
0%
261
3%
569
5%
921
9%
2200 21%
2029 20%
1690 16%
2840 26%
10546 100%
53
0%
551
3%
920
5%
1,602
8%
4,178 20%
4,159 20%
3,936 19%
5,149 25%
20,548 100%
276
0%
2,707
2%
5,411
5%
9,792
8%
26,749 20%
27,800 21%
26,421 19%
34,808 25%
133,964 100%
141
79%
3742
51%
12,128
65%
88,860
63%
15
4%
790
7%
2,401
10%
23,451
13%
9
6%
763
11%
1,321
8%
7,200
7%
73
24%
1491
17%
5,750
27%
30,226
23%
30
15%
2562
37%
4,137
25%
28,660
29%
223
71%
7697
76%
11,555
61%
73,868
62%
0
180
0%
100%
1,083
1%
125,803 100%
2
313
1%
100%
53
1%
7120 100%
254
1%
17,840 100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
49
1%
10027 100%
356
1%
20,062 100%
2,234
2%
129,779 100%
34
NSSE 2007 Background Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
27a. Father's educational
attainment
27b. Mother's educational
attainment
28. Primary major or expected
primary major, in collapsed
categories
29. Second major or expected
second major (not minor,
concentration, etc.) if
applicable, in collapsed
categories
a
FATHREDU
Response Options
Did not finish HS
Graduated from HS
Attended, no degree
Completed Associate's
Completed Bachelor's
Completed Master's
Completed Doctorate
Total
MOTHREDU Did not finish HS
Graduated from HS
Attended, no degree
Completed Associate's
Completed Bachelor's
Completed Master's
Completed Doctorate
Total
MAJRPCOL Arts and humanities
Biological science
Business
Education
Engineering
Physical science
Professional
Social science
Other
Undecided
Total
MAJRSCOL Arts and humanities
Biological science
Business
Education
Engineering
Physical science
Professional
Social science
Other
Undecided
Total
Count
11
29
24
11
62
35
10
182
14
28
20
21
70
25
4
182
19
14
18
8
27
8
25
13
36
10
178
9
1
4
3
1
5
2
1
7
0
33
%
7%
16%
13%
7%
32%
19%
6%
100%
8%
14%
10%
13%
40%
13%
2%
100%
10%
7%
10%
4%
20%
5%
13%
7%
19%
5%
100%
27%
2%
14%
7%
4%
20%
5%
2%
18%
0%
100%
Selected Peers
Count
%
807
1577
1254
440
1842
851
371
7142
705
1445
1449
699
1952
776
147
7173
674
728
1003
646
622
233
916
705
1305
294
7126
387
96
286
130
83
136
165
230
332
83
1928
11%
21%
17%
6%
27%
13%
6%
100%
10%
20%
20%
10%
28%
11%
2%
100%
10%
9%
15%
7%
10%
3%
12%
10%
19%
4%
100%
22%
4%
16%
5%
5%
7%
9%
12%
17%
4%
100%
Seniors
Carnegie Peers
Count
969
3,575
2,514
1,279
5,142
2,884
1,489
17,852
782
3,217
2,827
2,056
5,843
2,647
524
17,896
2,017
1,605
2,665
1,247
1,843
526
2,139
2,241
2,611
881
17,775
1,154
177
682
195
143
269
439
717
570
108
4,454
%
6%
21%
15%
7%
28%
15%
8%
100%
5%
19%
16%
12%
32%
14%
3%
100%
12%
8%
15%
7%
11%
3%
11%
11%
17%
5%
100%
25%
4%
15%
4%
4%
6%
10%
15%
14%
3%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
8,594
30,635
18,159
10,228
32,934
17,442
8,468
126,460
6,494
27,233
20,355
15,612
36,848
17,254
3,115
126,911
17,861
10,323
18,611
11,669
7,203
4,265
14,831
15,211
19,311
6,612
125,897
9,121
1,417
4,759
2,618
654
1,934
2,523
5,577
4,687
1,053
34,343
%
8%
25%
15%
8%
26%
13%
6%
100%
6%
22%
16%
12%
28%
13%
2%
100%
13%
8%
16%
8%
7%
3%
12%
11%
17%
5%
100%
24%
4%
15%
7%
3%
6%
8%
15%
15%
3%
100%
Texas Tech
Count
26
41
50
27
105
47
17
313
24
51
52
25
103
49
9
313
37
21
63
17
36
7
16
29
85
0
311
13
3
14
1
2
5
6
12
15
1
72
%
9%
12%
15%
10%
34%
15%
5%
100%
8%
14%
17%
9%
32%
17%
3%
100%
12%
7%
21%
5%
13%
2%
5%
9%
26%
0%
100%
18%
4%
18%
2%
3%
8%
7%
17%
21%
2%
100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
Selected Peers
Count
1694
2331
1770
732
2406
1098
474
10505
1577
2501
1939
1016
2319
1040
150
10542
1105
760
1507
1324
758
318
883
1193
2629
7
10484
374
98
313
252
35
174
87
349
375
48
2105
%
15%
21%
16%
7%
24%
11%
5%
100%
14%
23%
18%
10%
23%
10%
2%
100%
12%
8%
15%
9%
8%
3%
7%
12%
25%
0%
100%
20%
4%
15%
9%
1%
9%
4%
19%
17%
2%
100%
Carnegie Peers
Count
1,504
4,157
2,936
1,490
5,514
3,085
1,771
20,457
1,253
4,556
3,265
2,308
5,655
2,961
519
20,517
2,588
1,444
3,466
1,865
1,956
614
1,771
3,039
3,707
8
20,458
1,023
171
751
271
109
311
240
811
638
54
4,379
%
8%
21%
15%
7%
26%
14%
8%
100%
7%
23%
16%
12%
27%
13%
2%
100%
13%
7%
17%
8%
10%
3%
8%
14%
20%
0%
100%
21%
4%
19%
6%
2%
8%
5%
17%
16%
2%
100%
NSSE 2007
Count
12,250
31,958
19,104
10,755
32,830
17,557
9,085
133,539
9,632
33,222
20,751
16,285
33,679
17,591
2,772
133,932
19,893
8,887
22,594
13,743
7,188
4,323
12,082
19,976
24,618
58
133,362
7,041
1,153
4,931
2,900
424
1,677
1,444
5,807
4,651
400
30,428
35
%
10%
23%
14%
8%
25%
13%
7%
100%
8%
25%
16%
12%
25%
13%
2%
100%
14%
7%
17%
9%
7%
3%
9%
15%
20%
0%
100%
21%
4%
17%
8%
2%
6%
5%
19%
16%
2%
100%
NSSE 2007 Background Item Frequency Distributions a
Texas Tech University
First-Year Students
Texas Tech
Variable
Institution reported gender
GENDER
Response Options
Male
Female
Total
African American/Black
Am. Indian/Native Amer.
Asian/Pacific Islander
Caucasian/White
Hispanic/Latino
Other
Foreign
Multi-racial
Unknown
Total
Institution reported enrollment ENROLLMT Part-time
Full-time
Total
Mode of completion
MODECOMP Paper
Web
Total
Thinking about this current
DISTED
No
academic term, are you taking
all courses entirely online?
Yes
(item asked with the online
version only)
Total
Institution reported race or
ethnicity
a
ETHNICIT
Count
%
Selected Peers
Count
%
Seniors
Carnegie Peers
Count
%
NSSE 2007
Count
%
Texas Tech
Count
%
Selected Peers
Count
%
Carnegie Peers
Count
%
NSSE 2007
Count
%
89
141
230
10
0
10
172
33
0
4
0
1
230
8
222
230
0
230
230
55%
45%
100%
5%
0%
5%
74%
14%
0%
2%
0%
0%
100%
2%
98%
100%
0%
100%
100%
3059
5560
8619
441
168
396
4259
1888
29
221
0
52
7454
552
8067
8619
273
8346
8619
47%
53%
100%
8%
2%
6%
54%
25%
0%
4%
0%
1%
100%
7%
93%
100%
4%
96%
100%
8,120
13,001
21,121
1,510
170
1,157
14,717
1,225
162
501
30
958
20,430
740
20,381
21,121
411
20,710
21,121
48%
52%
100%
8%
1%
5%
72%
6%
1%
3%
0%
4%
100%
5%
95%
100%
5%
95%
100%
52,166
96,219
148,385
10,025
902
7,663
100,418
8,705
1,338
2,774
436
6,581
138,842
6,189
142,196
148,385
5,414
142,971
148,385
45%
55%
100%
9%
1%
6%
69%
8%
1%
2%
0%
5%
100%
6%
94%
100%
6%
94%
100%
167
191
358
8
4
8
286
44
2
5
0
1
358
35
323
358
0
358
358
57%
43%
100%
2%
1%
2%
81%
12%
1%
2%
0%
0%
100%
17%
83%
100%
0%
100%
100%
3873
7818
11691
567
266
421
6876
2645
75
230
0
77
11157
2598
9093
11691
649
11042
11691
42%
58%
100%
6%
2%
5%
58%
25%
1%
3%
0%
1%
100%
25%
75%
100%
7%
93%
100%
8,860
14,002
22,862
1,484
270
933
17,074
1,259
233
465
42
1,102
22,862
3,404
19,458
22,862
625
22,237
22,862
46%
54%
100%
7%
1%
4%
72%
8%
1%
2%
0%
4%
100%
20%
80%
100%
8%
92%
100%
51,973
96,182
148,155
9,272
1,012
6,422
105,447
8,353
1,339
2,477
315
6,600
141,237
21,403
126,752
148,155
6,112
142,043
148,155
43%
57%
100%
7%
1%
6%
71%
8%
1%
2%
0%
5%
100%
19%
81%
100%
7%
93%
100%
180
99%
6861
99%
17,465
99%
120,638
98%
313
99%
9408
96%
19,493
97%
124,028
97%
2
1%
82
1%
132
1%
1,767
2%
2
1%
529
4%
487
3%
4,420
3%
182
100%
122,405 100%
315
100%
6943 100%
17,597 100%
Column percentages (%) are weighted by gender, enrollment status, and institutional size. Because the counts are not weighted, you cannot calculate the column % directly from the counts.
9937 100%
19,980 100%
128,448 100%
IPEDS: 229115
36