RIS-2700-RST Roadshow
National Railway Museum, York
Presented by Hugh O’Neill, RSSB
19 April 2016
Welcome/Introduction
• Emergency evacuation: Alarm, exits and assembly
point
• Mobile phones, please turn them off
• NRM facilities, washrooms, internet access, etc.
• Refreshments and lunch will be served in here
• Q&A: Please give your name and affiliation
• Conference material will be provided by e-mail
following the conference
• Feedback forms will be handed out later, please
complete
2
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Welcome/Introduction
• Today is part of the overall communication strategy
to support standards change
• VAB conference has been held (31st March)
• Purpose of these roadshows is to create an
informed buyer (end user) community
• Embrace RIS-2700-RST – you can do this!
3
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Agenda
Time
Item
Lead
10:00
10:30
10:40
11:00
11:15
11:30
11:45
Registration and refreshments
Welcome / introductions
Regulator view
ATOC view
Creation of RIS-2700-RST and RIS-1710-PLT
Coffee Break
RIS-2700-RST: how does it work for me
12:15
RIS-1710-PLT: How will it be enabled
12:30
Certificates and RSL
12:45
13:00
13:30
Q&A
Lunch
The RISs in Action
Case study 1- The ROSCO View
Case study 2- RIS-2700-RST in a depot
Case study 3 – ‘50 Shades of Rust’
Case study 4 - PAB
14:30
14:45
15:002016
RIS-2700 Roadshows
Q&A
Closing remarks
End12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Hugh O’Neill, John Barber, RSSB
Giles Turner
ATOC, David Polhill
Hugh O’Neill, Graham Nicholas, RSSB
Graham Nicholas, RSSB
Malcolm Miles, Network Rail (12th &
19th)
Mick James, Plasser, Neil Halliday, RSSB
(12th only)
Graham Nicholas, RSSB
RSL representative
John Barber, RSSB
Nick Swift, Eversholt (12th) Mick Bishop,
Porterbrook, (19th)
David Polhil, ATOC
Graham Nicholas, RSSB
Malcolm Miles, Network Rail, (12th &
19th) Mick James, Plasser, Neil Halliday,
RSSB (12th only)
Hugh O’Neill
John Barber, RSSB
Regulator View
Presented by ORR
5
ATOC View
Presented by Neil Ovenden, ATOC
6
ATOC View
TOC Reflections on VABs
Neil Ovenden
Engineering Supply Chain Lead
RIS-2700-RST Roadshow - 19 April 2016
7
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIA View
Presented by Jim Lupton, ATOC
8
RIA View
Verification of Vehicle Change
Thoughts from the suppliers’ perspective
Jim Lupton, Deputy Technical Director
19th April 2016
9
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Creation of RIS-2700-RST
Presented by Hugh O’Neill, RSSB
10
Introduction
Content
• Background
• Writing
• Consultation
• Publication
11
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Background (why did we
need to do it?)
12
GM/RT2000 background
History
GM/RT2000 dates from June 1995 (issue 1)
• Published by Railtrack Safety & Standards Directorate
• Recognised the split of track and trains as a result of rail
privatisation in 1994
• Potential to import risk onto Railtrack controlled
Infrastructure
• All new / modified vehicles had to be certificated by a
Vehicle Acceptance Body
• Part of the then ‘Permissioning regime’ (Railtrack were in
charge of who and what was allowed to run on its network)
13
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
GM/RT2000 background
Rationale behind need for change
GM/RT2000 subsequently affected by changes in industry
• In 2003, RSSB established, taking over role of Railtrack S&SD
• In 2006, ROGS implemented the requirements of EU Rail
Safety Directive
 Roles of IM, RU and NSA formally recognised
• In 2006, RIR implemented the requirements of EU Rail
Interoperability Directive
 Notified Bodies established, certificating new vehicles
• GM/RT2000 has effectively been ‘out of scope’ since ROGS
2006
14
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
GM/RT2000 background
Rationale behind need for change
Interim and evolving arrangements have been implemented:
• ROGS 2006 allows Duty Holders to issue their own
certification under their own SMS.
• As an interim, TNC’s were issued and then subsumed into
GM/RT2000 issue 3 (2009) as a small scale change only –
mandatory use of VABs ended
• More recently, establishment of DeBos (2011), accredited by
UKAS, has duplicated the ongoing RSSB accreditation of VABs
• This was the ‘kick start’ for the re-writing of GM/RT2000
15
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Writing RIS-2700-RST
16
RIS-2700-RST drafting
Project Administration
Document drafting arrangements
• Project overseen by Cliff Cork (and now Hugh O’Neill) and
endorsed by RST Standards Committee
• New document is a Rail Industry Standard (RIS)
 Can be adopted if industry member so chooses (as part of SMS)
 Recognises that GM/RT2000 is declared as ‘out of scope’
• Drafting work originally envisaged by committee but
ultimately undertaken solely by Graham Nicholas
• RSSB project management support provided by Andrew
Stafford and then Steve Basilio
17
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIS-2700-RST drafting
Guiding Principle
Nothing has changed!
(Well, that’s the theory…)
• Document reflects current situation
• Verification can be undertaken by a Duty Holder or an
independent Certification Body
• Compliance against applicable requirements (standards) still
has to be demonstrated
• New document is ‘catching up’ with how the world looks
today
18
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIS-2700-RST drafting
Overview
Document drafting work
• Work commenced July 2012 – blank sheet of paper
• Early work presented at March 2013 VAB conference and
Drafting Review Group April 2013
• RSSB Standards Policy and ATOC input to get the ‘pitch’ right.
• Drafting principles:
 Recognise current legislation – RIR, ROGS, CSM-RA, ECM (etc)
 Designed for use through a RU / manufacturer / ROSCO (etc) SMS or
by a independent third party (eg NoBo / DeBo)
 Preserve established ‘good practice’ (largely as guidance)
 Continue to advocate risk-based approach
19
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIS-2700-RST drafting
Content
1. Introduction
2. Principles of Verification
3. Role of Independent Verification
4. Verification Processes
5. Documentation and Records
6. Output from Verification
Appendices
Definitions / References
20
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Industry consultation
(and the aftermath!)
21
RIS-2700-RST consultation
Consultation exercise
• Draft 1m of the document provided for industry consultation
• Extended consultation Dec 2014 – March 2015
• 1067 individual comments received from 27 separate
respondents
• Significant duplication in comments
• All comments reviewed and individually responded
• Several recurring ‘themes’ identified
22
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIS-2700-RST consultation
Industry Workshops
• Two industry workshops held June 2015, cross-industry
representation (TOC, FOC, NR, ROSCO, ORR, VAB, RSL)
• Based around the recurring ‘themes’ from the consultation
 Workshop 1 – Principles of Verification and document layout / format
 Workshop 2 – Output from RIS-2700 and the link to RSL
• Document was re-drafted based on this output
 Greater ‘up front’ explanation provided in Part 2, additional diagrams
 Output from RIS-2700 defined as an ‘Attestation Statement’
• Re-drafted document approved by RST Standards Committee
• Workshop attendees and original consultees agreed
document was now fit-for-purpose
23
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Publication
(Live and Dangerous!)
24
RIS-2700-RST publication
Implementation
•
November 2015 – final version complete
•
Dec-Jan 2016 – post-consultation Standards Committee
visits
•
March 2016 – RIS-2700-RST published
•
June 2016 – GM/RT2000 withdrawn; VABs formally closed
•
UKAS to add RIS-2700 (and RIS-1710 for plant) to ISO17065
accreditation of DeBos (by 4th June 2016)
•
March 2017 – ‘One year on’ review(!)
25
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
COFFEE BREAK
26
RIS-2700-RST:
How does it work for me?
Presented by Graham Nicholas, RSSB
27
Introduction
Content
• Extent of Verification and choice of Assessment Party
• Scope of (certification) work and applicable requirements
• Design, Maintenance and Construction scrutiny
• Records and Technical Files
• Statements and Certificates
28
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Extent of Verification and
choice of Assessment Party
29
Extent of Verification and choice of Assessment Party
Verification Triangle
•
Extent of Verification
linked to risk and scale of
project [G 2.3.1.1]
•
Risk profile is for proposer
to determine [G 2.3.1.2]
(see next slide)
•
Use of Third Party better
suited to upper reaches of
triangle (but doesn’t have
to be!)
30
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Extent of Verification and choice of Assessment Party
The approach to risk
•
Responsibility of Proposer to evaluate (and document) the
risk profile of the engineering change (ref CSM-RA) [4.2.1.1]
•
G 2.3.1.2 lists generic / typical risk considerations. This
includes risks with installation phase as well as design phase
 The proposed installation programme (who? where? capability?)
 Involvement of supplier(s) of critical materials, components and / or
services (competence / assurance arrangements).
•
31
The risk profile should then guide the scope and extent of
verification work to be undertaken [G 4.2.1.1.6]
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Extent of Verification and choice of Assessment Party
First, Second or Third Party
•
Decision flowchart [end of Clause 3.2]
•
It is the proposer’s decision!
•
Whoever issues the Attestation
Statement defines whether the
verification constitutes first,
second or third party [G 3.1.1.2]
•
Independent Body may
contribute to a second party job
32
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Extent of Verification and choice of Assessment Party
A word about competency
•
If undertaking the work as a Second Party then personnel of
appropriate competency are required [G 3.2.3.2.2 a]
•
Section 3.3 and Appendix A contains further requirements
and guidance.
•
There are many ways of demonstrating competency, eg
 Extended CV / Professional Review Paper
 CPD (linked to Professional Engineer status)
 Ongoing appraisal (eg linked to performance review process)
•
33
The approach should be proportionate to risk – but be wary
of the ‘Trust me – I’m an engineer’ approach!
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Scope of work and
applicable requirements
34
Scope of work and applicable requirements
Principle
•
35
Work under RIS-2700 is limited to verifying conformity with
applicable requirements (the grey bit of Table 1). [G 2.2.1.5]
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Scope of work and applicable requirements
Detail
•
Scope of verification to be agreed between Proposer and
Assessment Party [4.2.1.1]
•
Scope of work based on risk profile (see earlier)
•
Applicable Requirements are defined in G 2.4.1.2
•
Requirements can be voluntary as well an mandatory!
36
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Design, Maintenance &
Construction scrutiny
37
Design, Maintenance & Construction scrutiny
Overview
•
If you ever wondered what exactly it was that you paid VABs
for then Part 4 of RIS-2700 explains all!
•
Part 4 is a mixture of:
 Existing content of GM/RT2000 (and Tech Notes), GM/RT2001 etc but
brought up to date
 ‘Return of Experience’ on the application of previous application of
VAB process
 Other guidance offered as appropriate.
•
38
Designed to be applied on a risk-based, proportionate basis
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Design, Maintenance & Construction scrutiny
Design / maintenance
•
Design flowchart [4.3.1]
•
Reduced design scrutiny (the
old ‘minor mods’, etc) outlined
in Appendix B
•
Role of testing outlined in
Appendix D
•
Maintenance is a variation on
the clause-by-clause element
of this flowchart [4.3.2]
39
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Design, Maintenance & Construction scrutiny
Construction
•
Construction flowchart [4.4.1]
•
More detail than what was
previously offered by
GM/RT2000 Appendix M
•
Centres around degree of
reliance on what the installer
submits
•
Role of audit and surveillance
40
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Records & Technical Files
41
Records & Technical Files
Overview
•
RIS-2700 requires an assessment report which is ‘in
proportion with the scale of the engineering change and /
or risk involved’ [4.5.1 & G 4.5.1.2]
•
Can be as simple as a statement or series of statements in
an engineering change pro forma.
•
For more complex projects, an approach more akin to the
compilation of a Technical File may be more appropriate [G
5.2.1.1.1]
•
42
Recognise any requirements of the vehicle owner / keeper
in maintaining vehicle history records [G 5.3.1.1.8]
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Statements & Certificates
43
Statements & Certificates
Overview
•
Final output Attestation Statement [6.1.1]
•
Takes its cue from definition in ISO17000:2004:
•
Deliberately chosen as an abstract, generic term – you can
call it what you like
44
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Statements & Certificates
Detail
•
Content outlined in 6.1.2 a) to g) – not all necessarily apply
•
You are signing to say ‘this complies’ – so make sure it is
clear what you are signing for!
•
Caveat it if necessary (limitations or conditions of use)
•
A Third Party Body is more likely to issue a formal certificate
•
A certificate is still an ‘Attestation Statement’!
45
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIS-1710-PLT: How will it
be enabled?
Presented by Malcolm Miles,
Network Rail
46
RIS-1710-PLT: How will it be enabled?
47
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIS-1710-PLT: The Role of
Plant Assessment Bodies
Presented by Neil Halliday, PLT SC
48
RIS-1710-PLT Role of Plant Assessment Bodies
• RIS-1710-PLT Engineering Certification of Railborne Plant
•
•
•
•
•
Project supported by PLT SC in June 2014
Need to retain specialist role of Plant VABs
Project spearheaded by Mick James
Supports withdrawal of GMRT2000
Published in December 2015
• Available for adoption by any GB infrastructure manager
• OTPs and OTMs used on several networks
• Benefit of a common approach to assessment
• National plant database hosted by Network Rail
49
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIS-1710-PLT Role of Plant Assessment Bodies
• STATUTORY REQUIREMENTS
• Manufacturer self certification to the Machinery Directive.
• OTM’s in running mode assessed by NoBo against TSIs,
DeBo for NNTRs and AB for CSM(RA) report
• ENGINEERING CONFORMANCE
• Railborne plant assessed for compliance to standards by PAB
• PRODUCT ACCEPTANCE
• Acceptance of first of class by each infrastructure manager
• USE OF PLANT
• Assessed by the user to confirm it is capable of delivering the
safe work plan proposed
50
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIS-1710-PLT Role of Plant Assessment Bodies
• Creation of Plant Assessment Bodies (PAB)
• OTMs and OTPs in travelling and working modes
• OTM in running mode when not in scope of the
Interoperability Directive (significant modifications)
• Engineering Conformance Certificates to replace EACs
• PABs to be accredited by UKAS
• Plant VABs will cess to be licenced by RSSB
• UKAS need time to accredit PABs
51
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIS-1710-PLT Role of Plant Assessment Bodies
• Strategy to create new PABs starting 18 months ago
to coincide with publication of RIS-1710-PLT
• Discussions with UKAS to manage the transition from
Plant VABs to Plant Assessment Bodies
• Building on evidence as an existing supplier of services
• For this year – desktop review by UKAS
• Ongoing - normal UKAS accreditation processes
• New companies entering the market
• Normal UKAS accreditation processes
• RSSB to provide technical support
52
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIS-1710-PLT Role of Plant Assessment Bodies
• RIS-1530-PLT (Issue 6) Technical Requirements for On-Track
Plant and their associated Equipment and Trolleys
• Separation of technical requirements from assessment
• Introduce a new Plant Gauge
(W6a, Lower Sector Vehicle Gauge and LUL sub-surface gauge)
• Plant design risk assessment – combining Machinery Directive
with CSM risk assessment
• Trolleys now within scope of RIS-1530-PLT
• Retains seven year re-certification of OTP
53
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Certificates and RSL
Presented by Graham Nicholas, RSSB
and Andrea Horton, Worldline
54
Certificates & RSL
Overview
•
Final output from GM/RT2000 was a Certificate of
Engineering Acceptance
•
Final output from RIS-2700 is the Attestation Statement
•
They are not the same thing!
55
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Certificates & RSL
What we have done
•
A Certificate of Engineering Acceptance essentially said two
things:
 A statement that the change being certificated complied with
Mandatory Requirements
 Updated information regarding data for the Rolling Stock Library
•
A RIS-2700 Attestation Statement only says the first of these
•
In order to ‘plug the gap’ an amendment to GM/RT2453
was issued in the March 2016 catalogue
56
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Certificates & RSL
GMRT2453 Amendment
57
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Certificates & RSL
GMRT2453 Amendment
58
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Certificates & RSL
Requirements going forward
•
A Statement of Vehicle Configuration (SVC) is only required
when GM/RT2453 Mandatory Data is changed. This
includes:
 Any changes to expiry dates (linked to limitations)
 Any changes to vehicle status
•
RSL only require to be sent SVC
•
If there is no change to Mandatory Data (which will be the
majority of the time) then there is no requirement to send
RSL anything!
59
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Certificates & RSL
Requirements going forward
•
Advising RSL of any change to Mandatory Data is outside
the scope of RIS-2700 (ref Table 1 in 2.2.3)
•
An authorised rep. of the RU may do this on behalf of RU
nonetheless
60
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Questions Please?
61
LUNCH
62
RIS-2700 and RIS-1710 in
action
63
The ROSCO view
Presented by Mick Bishop
64
The ROSCO View
Verification of Vehicle Change Roadshow
NRM, York, 19 April 2016
RIS-2700-RST
ROSCO’s view on the important changes for the
verification of vehicle change.
Mick Bishop – Porterbrook Leasing
65
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIS-2700-RST in a depot
Presented by Neil Ovenden, ATOC
66
RIS-2700-RST in a depot
VABs & mods
Neil Ovenden
Engineering Supply Chain Lead
RIS-2700-RST Roadshow - 19 April 2016
67
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
50 shades of rust
RIS-2700 in the heritage world
Presented by Graham Nicholas, RSSB
68
Case Study – Second Party with external input
Introduction
Old steam locomotive to be brought back into service, with
significant rebuilding
69
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Case Study – Second Party with external input
What Verification work is required?
•
Take stock and assess the risk [ RIS-2700-RST G 2.3.1.2]
 Whose doing the work?
 Provenance of parts?
 New / recycled materials?
 Modification for modern
safety systems
•
70
Role of the CSM-RA
[G 2.4.1.2]
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Case Study – Second Party with external input
What Verification work is required?
•
Identify applicable requirements
 Refer to G 2.4.1.2
 Railway Group Standards (where not exempted by deviation)
 Pressure System Safety
Regs for the boiler
 CCS TSI for GSM-R
•
71
Role of GM/RT2003 &
MT276
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Case Study – Second Party with external input
Plan for Verification work
•
Adopt second party approach
 One part of the organisation co-ordinates and undertakes the
restoration work
 An engineer within (or on behalf of) the organisation, not otherwise
involved on the active work on the locomotive, designated to
undertake the verification work [G 3.2.3.1.1]
•
SMS / QMS to include processes for verification [3.2.3.2]
 G 3.2.3.2.2 gives guidance as to what SMS / QMS should contain
•
72
Competency records support the approach [3.3.1 & 3.3.2 &
Appendix A]
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Case Study – Second Party with external input
Plan for Verification work
•
Appoint independent bodies to undertake specific aspects
of the verification work
 Examination / Approval of boiler work
 Non-Destructive Testing examination of frame components
 Notified Body for installation of GSM-R radio
•
Competence / suitability
checks of organisations
[3.3.3a & D.1.5]
•
Requirements made clear
by contract [3.3.3b]
73
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Case Study – Second Party with external input
Plan for Verification work
•
Assessment plan
 Internal understanding between doers and checkers [4.2.1.1]
 Recognise involvement of independent parties
•
Plan to linked to scope of verification and thus risk [4.2.2.1]
•
Identify critical checks to be carried out [G 4.2.2.1.1]
Plan the work; work the plan!
74
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Case Study – Second Party with external input
Assessment work - Design
•
Assess design against the applicable RGS [G 4.3.1.2]
•
Apply for deviation (GM/RT2000 App. H) [G 4.3.1.6]
•
Identify any critical
areas [G 4.3.1.9]
•
Maintain record in
decision log [G 4.3.1.3]
75
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Case Study – Second Party with external input
Assessment work – physical work on locomotive
•
Undertake inspection / checks according to plan (and list in
G 4.4.1.1)
•
Confirm suitability of any contractors involved with
restoration / rebuild
•
Check provenance of
materials and parts
•
Re-work any parts that
do not conform
•
Maintain record in
decision log [G 4.4.1.7]
76
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Case Study – Second Party with external input
Assessment Work – contribution of independent bodies
•
Independent bodies undertake scrutiny, inspections, checks
•
Work in accordance with
RIS-2700 through contract?
•
77
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Produce their own
statements of
compliance
Case Study – Second Party with external input
Assessment Work - Testing
•
Oversee testing [Appendix D, via G 4.3.1.7]
•
Test specification & plan [D.1.3 & D.1.4]
•
Independency of Test
personnel [D.1.5]
•
GMRT2003 and MT276
define standard tests
•
Maintain record in
decision log [G 4.3.1.3]
78
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Case Study – Second Party with external input
Records and Decisions
•
Summarise records of verification work carried out [4.5.1 &
5.2.1.1]
•
Consider equivalent of Technical File [G 5.2.1.1.2]
•
Provides a record of the Engineering Change [G 5.3.1.1.5]
and configuration of the locomotive in its current state
[5.2.1.2]
•
Identify any limitation /
conditions of use [4.5.2 & App. C]
79
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Case Study – Second Party with external input
Records and Decisions
•
Produce attestation statement [6.1.1 & 6.1.2], which refers
to subsidiary statements [G 6.1.2.7]
•
Present to operator and provide info for GE/RT8270 and
GM/RT2453 [6.1.3.3]
if required
80
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Case Study – Second Party with external input
Success!
Enjoy the fruits of your labours!
81
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
RIS-1710-PLT: Role of the
Plant Acceptance Body
Presented by Malcolm Miles
82
Customer’s View
Case Study 5
Case Study 5 – Plant Acceptance
Malcolm Miles – Principal Engineer
12-Apr-16 / 1
83
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Questions Please?
84
Closing Remarks
Presented by John Barber, RSSB
85
Engineering Acceptance a ‘Potted History’
In force
CIF11ststApril
April 1994
1994
86
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
June June
1993199
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Engineering Acceptance a ‘Potted History’
GM/RT2000 Iss1
GM/RT2000 Iss 3
ROGS 2006
ROTS
RSCR
RSCWR
CDGR
In force
CIF11ststApril
April 1994
1994
87
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
June June
1993199
VAB Accreditation
1995
– 4th June 2016
Continuing VAB
Accreditation
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
1994 - 195
Engineering Acceptance a ‘Potted History’
In force
CIF11ststApril
April 1994
1994
88
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
June June
1993199
VAB Accreditation
1995
– 4th June 2016
Continuing
VAB
Accreditation
Continuing VAB Accreditation
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
1994 - 195
Engineering Acceptance a ‘Potted History’
GM/RT2000
GM/RT2001
PS305-04
GE/GN8565
(RIS-1530-PLT
Part 3 (DEC
2015)
4th June 2016
In force
CIF11ststApril
April 1994
1994
89
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
June June
1993199
VAB Accreditation
1995Ceases
– 4th June 2016
VAB Accreditation
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
1994 - 195
Engineering Acceptance a ‘Potted History’
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Engineering Acceptance a ‘Potted History
12th June 1889 – Armagh Collision, 80
killed, numerous persons seriously injured,
many of which were young children
Profound public shock and outrage led to
rapid amendment of the Regulation of
Railways Act which came into force 30th
August 1889
made continuous automatic brakes and
absolute block working compulsory and
importantly – gave power to the Board of
Trade to “compel defaulters to conform”
‘Happy go lucky’ days ultimately ended
and the modern phase of railway working
as we know it began
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Engineering Acceptance a ‘Potted History
• Engineering acceptance, established 1889?
• There have been many changes, undoubtedly there
will be many more, however • The fundamental principles of ‘conformity assessment’
as a means to demonstrate ‘due diligence’ remains the
same
• But the landscape has changed, things have moved on
and we have to move on with it
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Engineering Acceptance a ‘Potted History’
• It is time to close this chapter in railway safety history
and embrace the opportunities that the new standards
can bring
• Much has been learned and the experience gained can
serve us well in the future
• VAB has served a purpose and in doing so has made a
significant contribution to railway safety
 22 years of operation
 ≥110,000 certificates issued by 200 + signatories, and
countless ‘support engineers / personnel’ in 21 VABs
RIS-2700 Roadshows 2016
12 April 2016
Confidentiality level
Questions?
94
Thank you