ETNA Electronic Transactions on Numerical Analysis. Volume 24, pp. 7-23, 2006. Copyright 2006, Kent State University. ISSN 1068-9613. Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu ON RECURRENCE RELATIONS FOR RADIAL WAVE FUNCTIONS FOR THE -TH DIMENSIONAL OSCILLATORS AND HYDROGENLIKE ATOMS: ANALYTICAL AND NUMERICAL STUDY R. ÁLVAREZ-NODARSE , J. L. CARDOSO , AND N. R. QUINTERO Abstract. Using a general procedure for finding recurrence relations for hypergeometric functions and polynomials introduced by Cardoso et al. [J. Phys. A, 36 (2003), pp. 2055-2068] we obtain some new recurrence relations for the radial wave functions of the -th dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillators as well as the hydrogenlike atoms. A numerical analysis of such recurrences is also presented. Key words. wave functions, linear recurrence relations, Laguerre polynomials AMS subject classifications. 33C45, 11B37, 81V45, 81Q99 1. Introduction. There are many applications in modern physics that require the knowledge of the wave functions of hydrogenlike atoms and isotropic harmonic oscillators (see e.g. [13, 16] and references therein). Of particular interest is the numerical implementation of such functions. The most natural, efficient and fast way for generating such functions is to use recurrence relations. In fact, although the explicit expressions are known, their numerical implementations are usually very unstable. In this paper we will continue the research started in [8] for obtaining recurrence relations and ladder-type operators for the -th dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillators and the hydrogenlike atoms. In fact, using the technique of [8] we will obtain some new recurrences on one hand, and on the other we will present a comparative numerical analysis of the obtained recurrence relations for generating numerically the corresponding eigenfunctions. The numerical analysis of the linear recurrences, i.e., the rounding errors bounds, stability of the scheme, etc. is, in general, very complicate (see the nice paper [5] and references therein). So we will restrict ourselves to the discussion of the numerical examples. Even in this framework of no rigorous numerical analysis it is possible to conclude what kind of relations are more useful for numerical computations and what are not. This is the main original contribution of the present paper. Finally, let us mention that the present method for finding recurrence relations can be extended to any quantum system whose (radial) wave function are proportional to hypergeometric-type functions (see e.g. [4]). The structure of the paper is as follows: In sections 2 and 3 the isotropic oscillator and hydrogenlike atoms radial wave functions are introduced. In both cases we include some new recurrence relations as well as the detailed discussion of their computational applications. Finally, an appendix with the required formulas of the Laguerre polynomials is included. 2. The isotropic harmonic oscillator. The -dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator (I.H.O.) is described by the Schrödinger equation 1 ! . -, ! * + "0/ - "$& "$#&%(' " # % ) ') Received March 11, 2004. Accepted for publication June 3, 2005. Recommended by F. Marcellán. Apdo. Postal 1160, Sevilla, E-41080, Sevilla, Spain (ran@us.es). Departamento de Matemática, Universidade de Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro. Apartado 202, 5001 - 911 Vila Real, Portugal (jluis@utad.pt). Dpto. Fı́sica Aplicada I, EUP, Universidad de Sevilla, c/Virgen de África 7, 41011, Sevilla, Spain (niurka@us.es). Departamento de Análisis Matemático, Facultad de Matemática, Universidad de Sevilla. 7 ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu 8 R. ÁLVAREZ-NODARSE, J. L. CARDOSO, AND N. R. QUINTERO Its solutions are of the form 24793 8;: =<?> 8A@ :CB < , where 2793 8D: 65 by (see e.g. [3, 6]) 65 called the radial wave functions, defined =< is the radial part, usually 9XZY 8[R S L 8HGJI6L9K MON QL P 8A7 R S L I % ( _T : T9<QUF7=3 8 WV \^] X (2.1) 2793 8;: =<E;F793 8 05 _ 05 65 E ` fehg X being baT /c/c/ and bad /c// , the quantum numbers, and the dimension of the space. The angular part > 8A@ :iB < are the so-called th-spherical or_ hyperspherical harX monics [3, 14]. In the following, we will assume that the parameters , , are nonnegative integers. 2.1. Recurrence relations for the I.H.O. radial functions. For the functions (2.1) the following theorem hold [8] _ radial _ T HEOREM 2.1. Let 2 793 8;: =< , 2 7=3 R7 Kkj 8AR8 K : =< and 2 7=3 R7 L j 8AR8 L : =< be three different X % X 6 5 6 5 6 5 % functions of the -th dimensional isotropic harmonic oscillator, where and are integers such that l4mon _T;_ _T(_ e < a Then, there exist three all non vanishing polynomials in , prq , p % % (2.2) p qs: =<t27 3 j 8 : 9< p : =<t27=3 R7 K j 8AR8 K : =< p : =<t27=3 R7 65 65 65 : X X % X X % / , and p , such that L j 8[R8 L : =<Eba / The proof of this theorem can be found in [8]. A key point on the proof was the recurrence relation, P 8[R S L I % P 8AR8 K R S L I % P 8AR8 L R S L I % % i: w < u i: w < 7=3 R7 K :Cw < u :iw < 7=3 R7 L :iw <xyad uvq C: w < 7 (2.3) 5 5 where w T , and u0z :iw < , { |aT , are not all three vanishing polynomials. Moreover, in [8] it was shown that I % p q}: =<E~F7 3 j 8 u 65 p % : =<E~F7=3 R7 Kkj 8[R8 K 65 p : =<E ~ F 7=3 R7 L j 8[R8 L 65 (2.4) 8 R8 L q}: T< K I % 8L u % : d9< I % 8 u : d < K / From the above theorem and the relation (2.3) it is very simple to obtain à la carte relations between three different radial functions of the I.H.O. Let us point out that, in general, it is not easy to obtain the coefficients u6z in (2.3), nevertheless, combining in a certain way the known relations of the Laguerre polynomials (see the appendix A) they can be found. This has been shown in [7, 8]. We will show here how this works in one of the new examples, for the others the computations are similar. Here we present some examples. The first four can be found in [8] and the other five seem to be new. X % X V (2.5) _ % , , 4_ X X _ ya [8, page 2059] y 4 ; _ 9X % 273 I j 8: =< T9 27 3 j 8: 9< 65 05 4 _ X X 2 7=3 R % j 8t: =<0a / < V : 65 ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu _ ON RECURRENCE RELATIONS FOR REDIAL WAVE FUNCTIONS _ X % X ba , % , [8, page 2059] (_T d_T X V 2 7 3 j 8I % : =< 65 (2.6) V _ _ X % ya , X , % , ba [8, page 2059] (_T ]X X V 2 7 3 j 8I % : 9< 65 (2.7) X X < V : _ _ X X % , , % ya , [8, page 2059] b a V X ;_T X (2.8) _ % , , , p qs: =<t27 3 j 8 : =< p 65 z,{ For finding the polynomials_Tp mials in (2.3). Putting P0 u qs:iw < 7 :Cw < X % X _ 273 I % j t8 : =< 65 ]X T 2 7 3 j 8 : =< 65 (_T X (_d 9 27 3 j [8 R % : 9<0a / 05 d 2 7 3 j 8 : =< ` 65 273 R % j 8: =<Eya / 65 d9 2 7 3 8: =< ` 6j 5 ;_d X V 27 3 j A8 R % : =<Eya / 65 , i.e., we are looking for a relation of type (2.2) % : =<t27=3 R7 8AR8 : =< p 27=3 R7 L 8AR8 L : =<vba / 65 j 65 K$j K ad we use (2.4) where u0z , { aT are the polynoy we have P R % P I % % % u :Cw < 7I :iw < u :iw < 7=R % :Cw <Ea / P R % P I % Now we substitute the functions 7}I % :iw < and 7R % :iw < using the relations (A.2) X P0 X P R % Pv % % 7 I 7 :Cw < 7}I :Cw <x :Cw < w w and (A.4) P P I % P 7 :Cw <$ 7=R % :iw <E =7 R % :iw < respectively. This leads to u % :iw < X y X P P P % 7}I :iw < uvq :iw < u % :iw < u :Cw < 7 :Cw < u :iw < =7 R % :Cw <Ea / w w Comparing the last formula with the three-term recurrence relation TTRR (A.5) for the Laguerre polynomials we find u q}:iw <x w u % :Cw <E w u :Cw <x X ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu 10 R. ÁLVAREZ-NODARSE, J. L. CARDOSO, AND N. R. QUINTERO and therefore for the wave functions we find X d927}3 I % j 8AR % : =< 65 (2.9) d_T X : d9^27 3 j 8 : =< 65 <?273 R % j 8I % : =<Eba / 65 Analogously, we can find the following three recurrence relations X % X , _ % , 8 : 9 < p q : =<t2 7 3 j 65 (2.10) _ , p % : 9 <?2 7 3 I % j 8I % : = < 65 p : =<?2 =7 3 R % j 8AR % : = <EbaT 5 0 where, p qs: =<v =X : : d9 < p % : =<E : d9 X : X << : T9 (_T X : X < : T << V X X (_T X (_T X X X p : =<E : d9 <V : < _ _ X % ya , X , % , a (2.12) 4_ (2.11) X % ya , X X V : X 9X X 4_ 4_ (_T =X < d9 ;_T X (_T % : =< j 8t: =<va / _ % , , 4_ 9 X T9$27 3 j 8 65 4_ 4 _ X X T 9o^27 3 j 8[R % V 05 4_ X X X 2 7}3 I j 8[R % < V : 05 8 : =< Tc^27 3 j 6 65 d9 2 7 3 j 8AR 5 6 4_ X X <: < 273 R 65 X d9 _T X _ : 9< : 9< : 9<vba / / + ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu X % ON RECURRENCE RELATIONS FOR REDIAL WAVE FUNCTIONS X , _ _ % ya , X V X X : X X < V : 11 , < 4 _ X ; g X _ 4 ] T X ` 2 7}3 I % j 8t: =< 65 d9$T9027 3 j 8T: =< 65 4_ 4_ X 27=3 R % j 8AR % : =<Eya / 05 2.2. Ladder-type relations for the I.H.O. radial functions. Another important relations for the functions (2.1) are the so-called ladder operators. The following result was proved in [8]. l¡m[n radial _dh_ functions of the -th T HEOREM 2.2. Let 2 7 3 j 8: =< and 2 7=3 R7 K j 8AR8 K : =< be two e X X % X % 5 let % _dimensional isotropic harmonic _ 65 oscillator 6and : < a and : < X : % < ¡b ¢ a , where % and % are integers. Then, there exist three not all vanishing polynomials in , p q , p % , and p , such that (2.13) p q 2 7 3 j 8 : =< 65 p %£ 2 7 3 j 8: =< 5 £ 6 p 2 7=3 R7 K j A8 R8 K : =<Eya / 5 6 The proof of this theorem can be found in [8]. A key point on the proof was the recurrence relation, P 8ARS L I % P 8ARS L P 8AR8 R S L I % C: w < ¤ % :Cw < 7}I % :Cw < ¤ :Cw < 73 R7 K K :iw <xyad ¤q :Cw < 7 5 where ¤q , ¤ % , and ¤ are not all three vanishing polynomials. Moreover, (2.13) can be rewritten as _ ¤ % :iw < £ ¤ q :iw <?< ¤ % :Cw < 2 793 8;: =< d : ¤ % :Cw < £ 05 (2.15) % I8 F7 3 j 8 65 K 27=3 R7 Kkj 8AR8 K : =< / ¤ :Cw < 65 F 7=3 R7 K j 8AR8 K 65 To obtain the unknown polynomials ¤q , ¤ % , and ¤ in (2.14) we can proceed as in the (2.14) previous section, i.e., use the Eqs. (A.1)–(A.5) to transform (2.14) into one of the formulas (A.1)–(A.5) or in a sum of linearly independent Laguerre polynomials and solve the resulting equations for the unknown coefficients. Let us consider some examples. The first two are taken from [8] and the other two are new. _ X % ya , % [8, page 2061] _ ( _T X £ (2.16) T 27 3 j 8: 9<0 27 3 j 8AR % : =< / V 05 65 £ _ X % , % ya [8, page 2061] 4_ 4_ 9X X X £ : 7 8 : : (2.17) 3 2 73 R % j t8 : = < / T < 2 j = <E V < 65 5 6 £ ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu 12 R. ÁLVAREZ-NODARSE, J. L. CARDOSO, AND N. R. QUINTERO _ X % , % ba . Introducing these values into (2.14) and putting X Pv P R % P0 % % (2.18) ¤ qJ:iw < 7 :Cw < ¤ :Cw < 7I :iw < ¤ :iw < 7=R :iw <E a / we get Now, using relations (A.2) and the TTRR (A.5), (2.18) becomes into ¤ % :Cw < X X X P0 R % v P % % 7I :Cw < ¤q :iw < ¤ i: w < X ¤ :iw < 7 i: w < w w g 9 X w Pv % 7R C: w <va / ¤ :Cw < X Comparing with the TTRR (A.5) we find X ¤ qJ:Cw <x : ¤ % :Cw <x w g X < =X w g X ¤ :Cw <x : X w <: X =X w D <$ and therefore, for the wave functions we find (see (2.15)) = g X ¥ +_$ ¥ X X X £ d9 T 9 : <: < 27 3 j 8: =< 65 £ 4 _ 4_ X X X X <: < 27=3 R j 8 : 9< / V : 05 _ X % |a , % Following the same technique and using now twice, in the resulting (2.14), formulas (A.3) and (A.2) we get = X +_ g X d T T 627 3 j 8: =< 65 _ 4 4_ X X T V 2 7 3 j 8[R : =< / 05 £ £ 2.3. Numerical analysis of the recurrences. In this section we will present the numerical analysis of some of the recurrence relations and ladder-type operators for the I.H.O. We _ have used the commercial program M ATLAB [12]. X First of all, let us point out that if we choose the values of and large enough and compute the radial wave functions 2 7 3 j 8 : =< using the definition (2.1) we observe a picture of 65 an unbounded function that do not corresponds to the real ones. This picture is probably due to numerical instabilities and consequently, we can not directly evaluate these functions for a _ by means of (2.1). In figure 2.1 we represent the maximum value of the parameters given X , for which the direct computation works, i.e., the region below the curve defined by these points is the region of computational_ validity of (2.1). Therefore, if we want to have the X values of the radial functions for large enough, it is necessary to apply the recurrence relations (RR) in order to calculate them. From the previous sections it follows that the recurrence relations of the I.H.O. can be _ _ _ classify in three different types: X X¨§ _ X RRs_ which involve functions _ _ _ = 7 ¦ [ 8 ¦ : : : with indices , (see (2.5)); 2 < < X § X Xj © § X X§ © < , : < (see (2.6)); : < and : < (see (2.9)); and : < and : < (see (2.10)). We will call them the regular recurrences. ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu ON RECURRENCE RELATIONS FOR REDIAL WAVE FUNCTIONS 13 60 lmax 40 20 0 20 25 30 35 40 n F IG . 2.1. We plot the maximum value of ª versus « , for which the radial wave functions can be calculated by using (2.1). _ The_ other _}RRs, e.g. the ones _ which _ involve _} the indices _ : X _< , : X X X X X X X X X : <,: <,: <;: <,: <,: <;: <,: etc. (see e.g. (2.7), (2.8), (2.11), (2.12)). _¬ _ X _ s _ <,: X <; <,: <; Relations which involve the derivatives, i.e., ladder-type relations. In this section we evaluate the radial wave functions by using different recurrence relations with the aim to discuss their effectiveness (based on the time of the numerical simulations and convergence of the formulas). In all the numerical computations of 2 7 j 8 : 9< we use g and . 4 time (s) 3 2 1 0 0 50 100 150 n F IG . 2.2. We represent with pluses, stars and circles the computational time (in seconds) to obtain the radial function versus « from the RRs (2.5), (2.6), and (2.10), respectively. In this case ª­« and each function have been evaluated at ®?¯$¯$¯ points. ¥ the¥ function 2 ¥ 7 j 8 : =< in aaJa points, corresponding ¥ ¥ First of all, we evaluate to the ele / a +± a / a +± ), ments of the vector ¡ : / a / a c°°c° < (in the matlab notation _ by using the formulas (2.5), (2.6) and (2.10). In figure 2.2 we compare the computational X time to do these operations in each case when (notice that in this case we need to apply ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu 14 R. ÁLVAREZ-NODARSE, J. L. CARDOSO, AND N. R. QUINTERO the corresponding RR X times). 30 time (s) 20 10 0 0 50 100 150 n F IG . 2.3. Computational time versus the circles are results from (2.11)+(2.5). « for ª­²Q¯ . The pluses refer to the recurrence relation (2.5), whereas We observe that formula (2.5) allows us to compute these functions faster. The difference X _ We would like to remark in time among these methods is more appreciable when is bigger. 7 8 that in order to apply X the formula (2.5) to obtain 2 j : =< , we fix and change the first argument from to . In addition, we need to know the initial conditions of the RR, which in % _ this P 8[R caseI % are 2 q j 8 : =< and P 8A2R j 8 : 9I < % . Both functions are related with the Laguerre polynomials % : : and , respectively, regardless of the value of . Further0 < < q Z³ for using the relationZ(2.6) ³ 7 s q : more, one should use the initial conditions and 2 = < 2 7 j % : =< , j ) ) ) X but they can not be calculated by formula (2.1) for large values of (see figure 2.1) as already pointed out. So, the initial conditions should be calculated using the recurrence formula (2.5). Moreover, when we use the relation (2.6) we see that there exists an interval close to ´Wa where 2 7 j 8 : 9< diverges (oscillates without any pattern) and this interval becomes larger when X increases. This divergence, at the vicinity of zero, also appears when we use (2.10). In the last case, one should also use (2.5) to obtain the initial condition. The recurrences (2.7), (2.8), (2.11) and (2.12) are even more complicated to use than (2.6) and (2.10). They should be used together with (2.5), not only because the initial conditions, but also because their own nature (they mix both indices). Let us check if 2 7 j 8 : 9< can be _ (2.5) ¥ alone. obtained faster when we combine for example (2.11) with (2.5), instead of using X In figure 2.3 we show the computer time to obtain 2 7 j 8 : =< versus (and fixing a ) for the Both functions are computed in relation (2.5) alone, and combining (2.11) and (2.5) together. 4± / ¡± aJaa points corresponding to the elements of the vector a / a a a a9 . From this figure we conclude that the formula (2.5) is the best one for computing 2 7 j 8 : =< . Concerning the ladder-type relations, let us_ mention that the relations (2.16) and (2.17) X behave numerically unstable for large values of and , respectively. Therefore, they are not useful to compute numerically the radial wave functions but instead of this we can use them, together with (2.5) for finding the derivative of the radial wave functions (see figure 2.4). ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu ON RECURRENCE RELATIONS FOR REDIAL WAVE FUNCTIONS 15 0.15 R40,50(r) 0.05 −0.05 −0.15 0 6 12 18 r 1.0 dR40,50/dr (r) 0.5 0.0 −0.5 −1.0 0 6 12 18 r F IG . 2.4. In the top panel we show the µ&¶·¸ ¹º·»o¼Q½ computed by using the recurrence relation (2.5). In the bottom panel we represent the derivative of this function computed from the ladder-type relation (2.16). 3. Radial functions for the Hydrogen atom. In this section we will provide a similar study for the Hydrogen atom described by the Schrödinger equation ¾ ! . ,- ! "/ ¿ * + - "$#&% "$#&%(' " ) ') The solution is given by |y24793 8;: =<t> 8A@ :CB < , where the radial part 24793 8D: =< is defined by 65 65 [2, 9] 8 ÄQÅÆ P 8AR I À ]X 7} I8I % À X (3.1) 2 7=3 8;: =<E(F 7 3 j 8ÁÀ X I I I / 6 5 6 5 _ _& _ à à g |`Tà hÉ Èe X /c// Here and Çad //c/ are the quantum numbers, is the dimension of the space, and the normalizing constant F 7 3 j 8 is 65 Ê_¬ Y X _T : ( < g Y ]X F 73 j8 V X I / : < 05 Ë` As we already pointed out in [8], the Laguerre P polynomials that appear in the expression of the radial functions are not the classical ones 7 : < in the sense that the parameter as ) |b ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu 16 R. ÁLVAREZ-NODARSE, J. L. CARDOSO, AND N. R. QUINTERO X well as the variable depend on the degree of the polynomials, . When the parameters of the X classical polynomials ) depend on , the polynomials are orthogonal with respect to a variant weights (for more details see e.g. [10, 11, 18]). Nevertheless, as we showed in [8], using the algebraic properties of the classical Laguerre polynomials (A.1)–(A.5) one can derive the algebraic relations of the radial wave functions. 3.1. Recurrence relations and ladder-type operators for the radial functions. In [8] we proved the following IO IO ]X ]X X % T HEOREM 3.1. Let the functions 2 793 8Ì ÎÍ , 2 73 R97 K j 8 R8 K Ì ÎÍ and 05 05 ` _ I  OÍ be three different radial functions of É mon ` such that integers l4 _T;_ _T(_ e / X X % X X % : < a Then, there exist not all three vanishing polynomials in , pq , p % , and p = = g X X X % p q : =<t2 793 8 Ï p % : 9<?2 73 R7 K j 8AR8 K 65 65 = X X p : 9<?273 R7 L j 8AR8 L 65 ]X X _ 2 7=3 R7 L j 8AR8 X L Ì X 65 and % and % atom the ` -th Hydrogen , such that Ð Ï Ña / Ï Moreover, the expressions for the polynomial coefficients in the above formula are given by [8, Eq. (4.7) page 2063] I % 8 R8 L I % 8L p q : =<E p q : =<E~F 7 3 j 8 K p % : =<0 p % : 9<v~F 7=3 R7 K j 8[R8 K 65 65 I % 8 p : =<E p : =< ~ F 7=3 R7 L j 8AR8 L K 65 where prq , pr% , and pr , are the three vanishing of the linear relation non all polynomials Pv P R 8 P R 8L p _¬% : 9< @6R 7 KK I8 K : =< p : 9< @6R 7 L I8 L : =<Eyad _d p q : 9< @ : =< Ó X and ,Ò . As examples of recurrences obtained by using the Theorem 3.1 we have the following (the first two are taken from [8], the other five are seem to be new). Other cases can be obtained in the same _ way. _ % X % ,X , ÊÐ ÊÐ ya [8, page 2063] Ó_¬ _T ; =X X g X X g 27}3 I % j 8 : <: < =X 65 = g g 9X X : =<?2 7 3 j 8 (3.2) 05 Ê_ h_d 9X = X X X g 2 7=3 R % j 8 : <: < 9X ba / 05 _ _ X % X ya , % , 2064] +_ [8,4page _ _ _d g X X % : <c : <: <s927 3 j 8I : =< : =< Ô 6 5 _ _T g g g 9X X : (3.3) <t : <: < 27 3 j 8: 9< 05 _T +_$ 4_ X g X : <c : <: <O927 3 j 8[R % : =<Eba / 05 ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu 17 ON RECURRENCE RELATIONS FOR REDIAL WAVE FUNCTIONS _ _ X % ,X , % , a = X Ê_ X % : =<tx2 7=3 R j 8 5 0 ;_T _T 9X 9 g g X X 2 7 3 j 8 : < 9X 65 _T _T X ;_T ÌH: Ô < : 9< : =<ºÍ = X ÔÕ27=3 R % j 8AR % baT 6 5 _ _ X X % , , % , Ö=×HØÙÚÛ^ÜrÝÜÞßdàá×HØÙÚÛ^Ü âß×HØcÙÚÛ^Ü ØOßkÚ ÞJ×ÞJÚrØßiãtÚrØQÞJ×äåÜ Ù?ÜrÝJÜ6Þßtævç ç¡è éAêë äðÚ ÛñØ Üòâ ó ÞQô ì ¸ íîï ÚÛ^Ü ö ÜÊõ ×äåÜ ÙÜ Øß×äåÜ ÙÜrÝ$ß ØcØcä ×HØcÙÚÛøÜâdÜÞOßCÞè éAê&ë äÚ Û^Ø Ü ö Þ ô ä Ú ^ Û Ü â v ó ÷ ó = ì ù ú ú ¸ íáû îï ï Ü õ ×äåÜ Ùß×äåÜ ÙºÚÝQß ØQäÚÛøÜrÝ ×HØÙÚÛ^ÜrÝÜÞßCÞè éAêë ärÚ Û^ÜrÝ Þ ôü4ý=þ Ø ó ì û ú ¸ í ùú îï ï ØQäÚÛøÜ â ó ÷ _ _ X % X % , , , DÐ 9 = g X X p q : =<t27 3 j 8 p % : =<27}3 I % j 8I % 65 6 5 (3.4) X p : =<t27=3 R % j 8AR % ¨baT 65 where, p qs: =<E : _ 4_ X p % : =<E : X (_d =< ð¥ <: X : _ < X =+<=_$O : = <9 Ð T_ 4_ 9 X g g : < 9 X =<9 _ ;_T 9 X g X : g : < 9 X =< / g <: _ < +_$ X : : p : =<Eñ : < _ _ X % ya , X , % , a = = g X X % p qJ: =<?27 3 j 8 O p : =<27 3 j 8AR % 05 65 9 (3.5) X p : =<t2 7=3 R j 8 65 where, _ _ X 4 : p q}: =<E Ê ¬ _ X 9X % : p : =<E _d Ó_ X p : =<E : Q< : < : X < : X 4_ =<t9 Ê_T <: X (_T 9< : =X g O aT 9 X < 9X =<O g / ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu 18 R. ÁLVAREZ-NODARSE, J. L. CARDOSO, AND N. R. QUINTERO _ _ X % ,X , % b , a = = g X X % p q : =<t2 7 3 j 8 p : =<t2 7=3 R j 8 65 65 9 (3.6) X p : =<t27=3 R j 8AR % 65 where, p qJ: 9<0 : _ X <Q : Ó_T _T X : p % : <0 ;_T X =X : p : ) 9<0 +_ <: X 4_ X < : Ê_¬ =< / <: =< X 4_ : 9X g ÑaT 9 X < 9X g =<Oº 3.2. Ladder-type relations for the radial functions of the Hydrogen atom. Our start ing point is the following I I¬Â ]X ]X X % T HEOREM 3.2. Let 247=3 8 Ì Í , and 27=3 R7 K j 8[R8 K Ì Í two dif- 65 05 É` l4mon ` I¬Â ]X _ and ÿ N 2793 8 Ì derivative _T;_ ferent radial functions of the Hydrogen atom Í , the X first X % X % ÿ 6 5 ` %< % _ : with respect to , where and are integers such that e X % % : : a, < < f ¢ a . Then, there exist not all three vanishing polynomials in , pq , p % and p , such that (3.7) p q : =<?2 97 3 8 05 = X g p % : 9< £ 2 =£ X p : =<t2 7=3 R7 K j 8AR8 K 65 7=3 8 65 X % = X g g ya / The proof is similar to the one of Theorem 2.2 and was given in [8]. In fact in this case the relation (3.7) becomes into (see [8, (4.13) page 2064]) _ = g X ¤ qJ: =<?^2793 8 O 65 9 (3.8) g F 73 j8 X X % 05 27=3 R7 8AR8 ¤ : =< F7=3 R7 Kj 8AR8 K 65 K j K 65 where the polynomials ¤ q , ¤ % , and ¤ are such that P R % P P R 8 % % ¤q : < @ : < ¤ : < @I : < ¤ : < @6R 7 KK I8 K : <xyad (3.9) _ Ê_¬ X I X and b , ,Ò . above theorem it is easy to obtain several relations for the _ radial wave Again, from the X 8K ¤ % : 9< £ £ ¤ % : =<s~ functions of the Hydrogen atom and, in particular, the ladder operators in and , respectively. We will present here some of them. The first three are taken from [8] and the other two are seem to be new. _ X % ya , % [8, page 2065] _ = _T £ 2793 8;: =<E 65 £ _T (3.10) : < g 2 7 3 j 8AR % : =< / V X : < 65 ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu _ 19 ON RECURRENCE RELATIONS FOR REDIAL WAVE FUNCTIONS X % , % [8, page 2065] _ _ 4_ 9 g X X : 9 7 8 =< £ ¬ : < å 2 3 Ñ £ 4_ 65 4_ X (3.11) X : < I % ]X X g ¬ 27=3 R % j 8AR % Ì <: < X : : < 65 Ë` _ X % , % ya [8, page 2066] X £ g X : <Z2 793 8;: 9<v £ +_ : 4_ : < < 65 = (3.12) X X : : < X X < g ¬ 2 7=3 R % j 8 g ¬ : <: < X X : : < < _å 65 _ X % Êa _¬, % . Introducing these values into (3.9) and putting X Ò and 7=R NSL we get Pv P R % P R % % (3.13) ¤ qs: < @ : < ¤ : < @I : < ¤ : < @I : <xba / Now, using three times relations (A.4) and (A.2), (3.13) becomes into P R :Ò < :Ò < ¤q : < ¤ % : < ¤ : < @I : < P R :Ò < :Ò < ¤ q: < ¤ % ¤ : < @I % : < :Ò <Ò P R ¤q : < ¤ : < @ : <xya / Comparing with the TTRR (A.5) we find < Í /  ¤ : x g < : < : < : < : < g : < : < : Ò < % ¤ : <x g and therefore (see (3.8)), for the wave functions we find _ _T _ _T ( £ : < : : <: << +_$ £ +_Q _ _ X = g X X : < Àå: <: < X I 2 7 3 j 8 +_Q +_$ 4_ _ à 65 X X = X X g : <: < : <: < X 7 [ 8 R 2 3 O /  I ]X 0j 5 _ ` X % , % ya Ø äÚ ÛøÜâ äÚ Û^ÜrÝ ÜòÞ ô Þ Ü ÙÜ Þ Ú äÚ Û^Ü â ×äÚÙºÚÛøÜ Øß ô Ø*ó ï Ø ó Ø ï Ø*ó î ï î Þ Ü äÚ Û¾Ø Üâ ×ä4ÜòÙß×ä+ÚÙsÚÛ¾ÜØß4è éAê&ë à ärÚ Û¾Ø Üòâ ÞQã ü ó0÷ ó ì ¸í ï ï äÚ ÛÚÝ õ ×äåÜ Ùß×äåÜ ÙºÚÝQß×äÚÙºÚÛrÜ ØOß×äÚÙºÚÛøÜâßtè éAê&ë äÚ ÛÕÚ+Ý Þ ô f Ø v ó ÷ Ø ó ì ï û ¸ íîï ÷ ¤q : <x Ò Ò :Ò g / ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu 20 R. ÁLVAREZ-NODARSE, J. L. CARDOSO, AND N. R. QUINTERO 3.3. Numerical_ analysis of the recurrences. As in the previous case, the radial wave X functions for and large enough, calculated by using the functions (3.1) (by means of the Laguerre polynomials), behave as an unbounded function, and therefore we can not directly X evaluate_ these functions for a given . In figure 3.1 we show the critical values of @ for a given for which the radial functions can be computed using the explicit expression (3.1). _T formula works is the one defined by the two curves in figure The region where the explicit X X @ ). 3.1, (it is defined the values 100 80 nmax 60 40 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 l F IG . 3.1. We represent with solid line the function «ð­ªÑ® (this line represent the minimum value of « ) and with the stars joint by the dashed line the maximum value of « for a given ª for which the radial wave functions can be calculated using (3.1). Again we have studied numerically how to obtain the radial wave functions applying the recurrence relations (RR) of two types: the first ones are represented by the formulas (3.2), (3.3) and (3.4) and the second ones correspond to the ladder-type RRs (3.10), (3.11) and (3.12). For the former RRs we observe that the relation (3.2) is the most useful one because the initial conditions 2 8AR % 8 and j by_Tusing the Laguerre polynomials (notice that in this case 2 8AR j 8 _ can be calculated X _ we fix and start with ). X in the relation (3.3) we fix and increase the value of in each step up to its maxX imum value. From figure 3.1 we conclude that for large value of , we can not use the initial condition calculated by using Laguerre polynomials (formula (3.1)) and instead of this we should use the RR (3.2). For this reason, this relation can not be used alone (the same is true for the RR (3.4)). In addition, notice that the initial conditions are two radial functions, 2 7 j 8I % and 2 7 j 8 evaluated at , whereas (3.2) X gives us the same functions but at (this implies a rescaling of the argument). From figure 3.2 we observe that the computational time is less when we use the _ formula (3.2). Moreover, the formulas (3.3) and (3.4) are numerically unstable at X the vicinity of zero and this region becomes larger when and increases. As in the case of the I.H.O. the higher order relation (3.5) and (3.6) are not useful for numerical evaluation of the Radial functions. For the ladder-type relations we would like to point out the following remarks Notice that the expression (3.12) involves two wave evaluated at different functions X % X we need to know 2 7 j 8 : =< , points, so in each step to calculate 2 7=R j 8 : < X X but in the previous step we calculate 2 7 j 8 at : < , not at . For this reason ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu ON RECURRENCE RELATIONS FOR REDIAL WAVE FUNCTIONS 21 1.5 time (s) 1.0 0.5 0.0 −0.5 0 20 40 60 l F IG . 3.2. We represent with pluses, stars and circles the computational time versus ª («­ª® ) to compute the radial wave functions by using (3.2), (3.3) and (3.4), respectively. this RRs it is not useful for obtaining numerically the radial wave functions. As in the previous case, we can use the ladder-type relations (3.10), (3.12) and (3.11) together to (3.2), to compute the derivative of the radial wave function. As an example see the figure 3.3, where_ we Ð plot the radial wave function and its derivative by X using (3.10) for a and a. In general we verify that the ladder-type RRs are not useful in order to compute numerically the radial wave functions. Nevertheless they can be used, together with (3.2) for finding the derivative of the radial wave functions. Programs. For the numerical simulations presented here we have used the commercial program M ATLAB. The used source code can be obtained by request via e-mail to niurka@euler.us.es or ran@us.es. Acknowledgements. The authors thank J. Petronilho for interesting discussions as well as the unknown referee for his comments that help us to improve the paper. This research has been supported by the Programa de Acciones Integradas Hispano-Lusas HP2002-065 & E-6/03. The authors were also partially supported by the the DGES grant BFM 2003-06335C03-01 and PAI grant FQM-0262 (RAN); CMUC (JLC); and the DGES grant FIS2005-973 and PAI grant FQM-0207 (NRQ). Appendix. The Laguerre polynomials. The Laguerre polynomials hypergeometric series P0 X 7 % % : : < <7 7 : E F < X Y Z XZY )± ) ! ± ! " : " < q :" < "¬:" ¬< °°c° :" $< P 7 defined by the " X !7 : < " ! Ys <" ) "$# q : g c/ /c/¬/ These polynomials satisfy the following useful recurrence and differential-recurrence relations (see e.g. [1, 15, 17]) (A.1) (A.2) £ £ ) Pv R % X 7 : E < : ) ) P % P R 7 : 0 }7 I % : <$ < ) ) P Pv v X < 7 : < : < =7 R % : <$ ) ) ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu 22 R. ÁLVAREZ-NODARSE, J. L. CARDOSO, AND N. R. QUINTERO 1.5 −5 R60,50 (r) (x 10 ) 1.0 0.5 0.0 −0.5 −1.0 0 4 8 3 12 16 r (x 10 ) 5 −8 dR60,50/dr (r) (x 10 ) 3 1 −1 −3 −5 0 4 8 3 12 16 r (x 10 ) F IG . 3.3. In the top panel we show the µ$#·¸ ¹º·9»[¼Q½ computed by using the recurrence relation (3.2), whereas in the bottom panel we represent the derivative of this function computed from the ladder-type relation (3.10). (A.3) (A.4) (A.5) Pv X % : < 7}I : < : ) Pv P0 % 7}I % : <E 7 : < ) ) P0 Pv % X = X : < 7R : < : < 7 : < ) ) ) Pv R % 7 : v < ) ) P0 I 7 X Pv < 7 : Q< ) ) : Q< ) : X Pv < }7 I % : E < ya / ) REFERENCES [1] M. A BRAMOWITZ AND I. A. S TEGUN , Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Dover, Nueva York, 1964. [2] N. A. A LVES AND E. D RIGO F ILHO , The factorisation method and supersymmetry, J. Phys. A, 21 (1988), pp. 3215–3225. [3] J. AVERY , Hyperspherical Harmonics: Applications in Quantum Theory, Kluwe Press, Dordrecht, 1988. [4] V.G. B AGROV AND D.M. G ITMAN , Exact Solutions of Relativistic Wave Equations, Kluwer, Dordrecht, 1990. [5] R. B ARRIO , B. M ELENDO , AND S. S ERRANO , On the numerical evaluation of linear recurrences, J. Comput. Appl. Math., 150 (2003), pp. 71–86. ETNA Kent State University etna@mcs.kent.edu ON RECURRENCE RELATIONS FOR REDIAL WAVE FUNCTIONS 23 [6] P.K. B ERA , S. B HATTACHARYYA , U. D AS , AND B. TALUKDAR , Recurrence relations for N-dimensional radial wave functions, Phys. Rev. A, 48 (1993), 4764-7. [7] J. L. C ARDOSO , Relações de Recorrência para Funções do Tipo Hipergeométrico e Aplicações MecânicoQuânticas, Master Thesis, Universidade de Coimbra, Coimbra, 1994. [8] J. L. C ARDOSO AND R. Á LVAREZ -N ODARSE , Recurrence relations for radial wave functions for the -th dimensional oscillators and hydrogenlike atoms, J. Phys. A, 36 (2003), pp. 2055–2068. [9] M. M ARTIN N IETO , Hydrogen atom and relativistic pi-mesic atom in space dimensions, Am. J. Phys., 47 (1979), 1067-72. [10] A. M ART ÍNEZ -F INKELSHTEIN AND A. Z ARZO , Varing orthogonality for a class of hypergeometric type polynomials, in Proc. 2nd. International Seminar on Approximation and Optimization, J. Guddat et al. eds., Approximation and Optimization Series, Peter lang, Berlin, 1995. [11] A. M ARTINEZ , A. Z ARZO , AND R. YA ÑEZ , Two approaches to the asymptotics of the zeros of a class of polynomials of hypergeometric type, (Russian), Mat. Sb., 185 (1994), pp. 65–78, translation in Russian Acad. Sci. Sb. Math., 83 (1995), pp. 483–494. [12] Matlab, The Language of Technical Computing, the Math Works Inc Natick, MA, 2000. [13] J. M ORALES , J.J. P E ÑA , AND J. L ÓPEZ -B ONILLA , Algebraic approach to matrix elements: Recurrence relations and closed formulas for Hydrogenlike wave functions, Phys. Rev. A, 45 (1992), 4256-66. [14] A. F. N IKIFOROV, S. K. S USLOV, AND V. B. U VAROV , Classical Orthogonal Polynomials of a Discrete Variable. Springer Series in Computational Physics, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1991. [15] A. F. N IKIFOROV AND V. B. U VAROV , Special Functions of Mathematical Physics, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1988. [16] M. L. S ÁNCHEZ , B. M ORENO , AND A. L ÓPEZ P I ÑEIRO , Matrix-element calculations for hydrogenlike atoms, Phys. Rev. A, 46 (1992), 6908-13. [17] G. S ZEG Ö , Orthogonal Polynomials, Amer. Math. Soc. Coll. Pub., 23, American Mathematical Society, Providence, Rhode Island, 1975. [18] A. Z ARZO , Ecuaciones Diferenciales de Tipo Hipergemétrico, Ph.D. Thesis, Universidad de Granada, 1995.