Course Evaluations -- Administrative Computing Service -- U...

advertisement
Course Evaluations -- Administrative Computing Service -- U...
https://www.acs.utah.edu/prod/evaluations/evaluation-report...
course evaluations
University of Utah
Course and Instructor Evaluation Report
Summer 2008
College/School:
College of Science
Instructor:
PRESZLER,JASON ISAAC;
Subject:
Course #: 1090 - 001
Enrollment: 18
Mathematics
Evaluations processed: 10
Coll Alg Bus/Soc Sci
Course:
Print Date: 13-Aug-08
UU Standard Course Items
N SD
MA
A
1. The course objectives were clearly stated.
10 10.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0%
30.0% 60.0% 5.20 5.25
2. The course objectives were met.
10 10.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10.0% 20.0% 60.0% 5.10 5.17
3. The course content was well organized.
10 10.0% 0.0% 0.0%
0.0%
4. The course materials were helpful in meeting course objectives.
10 10.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10.0% 20.0% 60.0% 5.10 5.10
5. Assignments and exams reflected what was covered in the course.
10 10.0% 0.0% 0.0%
10.0% 20.0% 60.0% 5.10 5.22
6. I learned a great deal in this course.
10 10.0% 0.0% 10.0% 0.0%
7. Overall, this was an effective course.
10 10.0% 0.0% 0.0%
Composite score: 5.11
D
MD
SA
Avg S.Avg
30.0% 60.0% 5.20 5.19
20.0% 60.0% 5.00 5.13
10.0% 20.0% 60.0% 5.10 5.11
Subject composite score: 5.17
UU Standard Instructor Items Preszler,Jason Isaac
N SD
1. The instructor was organized.
9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 22.2% 66.7% 5.56 5.30
D
MD
MA
A
SA
Avg S.Avg
2. The instructor demonstrated thorough knowledge of the subject.
9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 88.9% 5.89 5.46
3. The instructor presented course content effectively.
9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 22.2% 66.7% 5.56 5.17
4. The instructor created/supported a classroom environment that was respectful. 9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% 77.8% 5.78 5.43
5. As appropriate, the instructor encouraged questions and opinions.
9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% 77.8% 5.78 5.32
6. The instructor was available for consultation with students.
9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 22.2% 77.8% 5.78 5.36
7. Overall, this was an effective instructor.
9 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 11.1% 22.2% 66.7% 5.56 5.28
Composite score: 5.70
Subject composite score: 5.33
N = number of responses
SD = Strongly Disagree (response value 1)
D = Disagree (response value 2)
MD = Mildly Disagree (response value 3)
MA = Mildly Agree (response value 4)
A = Agree (response value 5)
SA = Strongly Agree (response value 6)
S.Avg = Subject-wide Average for this question
Get Written Comments Report
DISCLAIMER: Department composite scores are current as of the date of this report, but may be revised if
additional evaluations are processed.
1 of 1
8/13/08 11:29 AM
Download