THE NEW CALACS! Pixel-based CTE Correction of ACS/WFC:! Extended Sources! Ray A. LUCAS1, Norman A. GROGIN1, Marco CHIABERGE1,2,3, and the ACS Team1! 1 Space Telescope Science Institute, Baltimore MD, Hopkins University, 3 INAF-IRA, Bologna, Italy ! ABSTRACT! 2 Center for Astrophysical Sciences, Johns In the presence of a high electric field, the dark current of a single pixel can be greatly enhanced. These hot pixels accumulate as a function of time on orbit; however, the reduction of the operating temperature of the WFC CCDs has dramatically reduced the dark current of the hot pixels. ACS devices undergo a worse with time due to radiation damage to on-orbit CCD detectors. affects objects thetheworst in the y-direction, monthly annealing processItwhich greatly reduces population of hot pixels and along columns, though greatest when farthest from the relevant amplifier. It affects across does not affectobjects the normal pixels.!a wide range of magnitudes, but the effects are worst in fainter Putting the electrons back where they belong! The effect of CTE grows also to a much lesser degree across rows in the xdirection, and its effect is sources, and affect photometry, astrometry, and the morphological shapes of sources. Using our new pixel-based CTE corrections, we perform an initial exploration of the effect primarily as seen along columns in the y-direction of the WFC at a recent epoch. We analyze extended-source photometry of ~1800 sources from our recent re-observation of a portion of the GOODS-North deep field. These observations were tailored to allow (1) determination of extended-source CTE losses via differential photometry of bright sources placed at different positions on the WFC detectors in different exposures, as well as (2) determination of CTE losses for extremely faint sources, not significantly detectable on individual exposures, whose locations we know a priori from the much deeper GOODS observations back when CTE losses were negligible. ! INTRODUCTION! ! The new Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS) calibration pipeline (CALACS) contains the pixel-based charge transfer efficiency (CTE) correction developed according to the Anderson & Bedin (2010) code.! !! CTE affects both the photometry and morphologies of extended objects such as galaxies. As a result, charge can be lost from objects, and shapes can be changed. In this initial part of the study, we concentrate on the photometry or recovery of the charge within a given region around these extended objects.! ! Pos 1 FLT! Pos 2 FLT! Pos 1 FLC! Pos 2 FLC! Pos 2! METHOD! ! We observed two positions in a well-studied area: the GOODS-North field, displacing the two positions in the y-direction by one full chip of the ACS/ WFC, so that there is a central region in which objects which were near an amp in one position are far from an amp in the other.! Figure 2: Cutouts of Pos1 (blue) and Pos2 (red) images from FLT (top) and new CALACS FLC images (bottom). Note y-direction CTE trails in FLT images at top, especially from star. These new 550-second z-band images have modest background levels of ~15.8 e- (Pos1) and ~9.9e- (Pos2). These somewhat mitigate the CTE loss. For reference, long blank-field WFC exposures in broadband filters can have background levels > 100e-. Since Pos1 and Pos2 have different background levels, the CTE in them will not be exactly the same: Pos1 should have better CTE than Pos2. RESULTS! FLT (left) vs FLC (right) Relative Photometry FLT (left) vs FLC (right) Absolute Photometry Figures 3a, b: FLT (uncorrected for CTE) vs FLC (corrected for CTE) relative (delta) photometry between Pos1 and Pos2 (Figure 3a, left) and absolute photometry offset from original GOODS “truth” image (Figure 3b, right). CONCLUSIONS! ! We processed and combined the Position 1 and Position 2 *_flt.fits images from the two positions, aligning them to a deeper original GOODS ACS/WFC “truth” image cut-out which we use as a reference image for both alignment and verification of existence of real objects in our shallower post-SM4 data. Using the new CALACS, we also processed and combined the new Position 1 and Position 2 *_flc.fits images, again using the same original GOODS “truth” image cut-out as reference., as we did for the corresponding *_flt.fits images.! ! We ran dual-mode SExtractor on the “truth” image and on our combined *_flt.fits images, and then on the “truth” image and our combined *_flc.fits (new CALACS-produced) images.! ! We then compared the photometry for data with the CTE formula of Chiaberge et al. 2009 with that of the combined *_flt.fits images and the combined *_flc.fits (new CALACS) images, and the original GOODS “truth” image.! Pos 1! Figure 1: The original circa ~2002 GOODS “truth” image with footprint overlay of new Pos1 (blue) & Pos2 (red), plus objects detected, color-coded by S/N. About 1800 objects were detected in the original GOODS image. S/N color code is in Fig. 3a,b. ! Although what we can say is somewhat limited by the lower S/N of our new images, we found that the CTE effect did not seem as great for faint extended sources in our data as we had expected. ! ! We also found that our new CTE correction seems to have little effect on extended sources at the faintest magnitudes. ! ! Since the effect itself seems smaller than we had expected, the fact that the new CTE correction algorithm doesn’t appear to do much at faint magnitudes is probably a good thing. The cleaner background in the “new CALACS”-produced FLC images may enable fainter detections. We plan to study this further. ! Figure 4. Residual magnitude loss for y=2000 versus Log flux in electrons. We compare the residual magnitude loss for different bins of source flux, before (FLT, black) and after (FLC, blue) the pixel-based CTE correction is performed. In red (CTE formula), we show the residual loss obtained if the CTE correction formula (optimized for post-SM4 data, Chiaberge, M., private communication) is applied to the photometry from the FLT image. In this case, the extended sources are considered as point sources. Details on the photometric correction formula, which is formally derived for stars only, can be found in Chiaberge et al., ACS-ISR 2009-01. REFERENCES! ! ! Anderson, J. & Bedin, L. R. 2010, PASP, 122, 1035–1064! Chiaberge et al. ACS ISR 2009-01 !