This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike License. Your use of this material constitutes acceptance of that license and the conditions of use of materials on this site. Copyright 2006, The Johns Hopkins University and Jonathan Samet. All rights reserved. Use of these materials permitted only in accordance with license rights granted. Materials provided “AS IS”; no representations or warranties provided. User assumes all responsibility for use, and all liability related thereto, and must independently review all materials for accuracy and efficacy. May contain materials owned by others. User is responsible for obtaining permissions for use from third parties as needed. The Tobacco Epidemic: An Historical Overview Jonathan Samet, MD, MS Institute for Global Tobacco Control Jonathan M. Samet, MD, MS Professor and chairman of the Department of Epidemiology of the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Clinician in the specialty of internal medicine and in the subspecialty of pulmonary diseases Research—health effects of active and passive smoking Served as consultant editor and senior editor for Reports of the Surgeon General on Smoking and Health Image source: Institute for Global Tobacco Control 3 Section A “Discovery” and Early Use of Tobacco and the Foundations of the Modern Epidemic “Discovered” in the Americas in 1492 by Columbus “The Spanish upon their journey met with great multitudes of people, men and women with firebrands in their hands and herbs to smoke after their custom.” - Christopher Columbus’ journal, November 6, 1492 Image source: www.nps.gov/colo/Jthanout/ TobaccoHistory.html, retrieved 11/2/05 5 Early Forms of Use in the Americas Smoking Ingested orally as syrup Snuff Chewing tobacco Enemas 6 Tobacco Image source: jones.house.gov/html/ photo.cfm?id=140&cat=3, retrieved 11/2/05 Wild Tobacco (Nicotiana rustica) Cultivated Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Any of numerous species of Nicotiana or the cured leaves of several of the species that are used after processing in various ways for smoking, snuffing, chewing, and extracting nicotine. Source: Encyclopedia Britannica. (1999). Tobacco is a plant originally indigenous to the Americas. However, tobacco found in modern tobacco products is not the same as the wild tobacco found growing in the Americas in the 15th century. Today’s cultivated tobacco has been highly engineered for consumption and nicotine extraction. 7 Global Spread of Tobacco 1530—Europeans begin cultivation in Santo Domingo 1556–59—Introduced in France, Spain, Portugal, and Japan 1560—Introduced to East Africa 1600—Smoking well established in Japan; introduced in India Continued 8 Global Spread of Tobacco 1612—John Rolfe plants first commercial crop in Virginia 1619—Africans brought to Virginia as indentured tobacco workers 1710—Russia’s Peter the Great encourages his courtiers to smoke tobacco to look more European 9 Early Concern King James on Smoking— “Smoking is a custom loathsome to the eye, hateful to the nose, harmful to the brain, dangerous to the lungs, and in the black, stinking fume thereof nearest resembling the horrible Stygian smoke of the pit that is bottomless.” King James on Passive Smoking— “The wife must either take up smoking or resolve to live in a perpetual stinking torment.” King James I, A Counterblaste to Tobacco,1604 Source: www.nps.gov/colo/Jthanout/ TobaccoHistory.html, 11/2/05 Continued 10 Early Concern 1600 − Chinese Philosopher Fang Yizhi points out that smoking “scorches one’s lung” Source: Brook, Timothy. Is Smoking Chinese? Retrieved December 16, 2002, from http://www.cityu.edu.hk/ccs/Newsletter/newsletter3/HomePage/IsSmokingChinese/IsSmokingChinese.html 11 Early Health Warnings 1761—John Hill in England warns of cancer of nose for snuff users (first clinical study?) 1889—Langley and Dickinson publish study on the effects of nicotine on nerve cells 1912—Monograph on lung cancer published by Dr. Isaac Adler 12 Early Efforts at Control 1604—King James I increases import tax by 4,000% 1620—Prohibited in Japan 1633—Death penalty for smoking in Turkey 1638—Use or distribution punishable by decapitation in China 1639—Banned in New Amsterdam (New York) 1890—26 U.S. States and territories outlaw sale to minors 13 Motivation for Early Efforts at Control Tobacco seen as an “evil plant” associated with savages from the New World Tobacco use viewed as a sin Addictive qualities begin to be recognized − Smokers are described as “besotted” or “bewitched” Initial health concerns include cancer, impotency, “drunkenness” 14 Evolution of the Modern Cigarette 1789–99 − During the French Revolution, cigarette use popularized as least like aristocratic snuff 1832 − Invention of rolled cigarette in Turkey 1852 − Introduction of matches 1880 − Bonsack machine patented 1912 − Book matches perfected by Diamond Co. Image source: http://resourcescommittee.house.gov/subcommittees/emr/usgsweb/examples/, 11/2/05 15 Birth of the “Modern” Cigarette 1913 − Birth of the “modern” cigarette − R.J. Reynolds introduces the Camel brand Image source: www.cdc.gov/tobacco/ sgr/sgr4kids/adbust.htm retrieved 2/28/06 16 The Manufactured Cigarette Tipping paper & plugwrap paper Filter Monogram ink Cigarette paper & adhesive Ventilation holes Image adapted from: Mackay, J. & M. Eriksen. The Tobacco Atlas. World Health Organization. Tobacco and additives 17 Smoke Components PAHs Benzo(a)pyrene Aza-arenes N-Nitrosamines Aromatic amines −2-Napthylamine −4-Aminobiphenyl N-Heterocyclic amines Aldehydes Source: Hoffmann and Hoffmann. (1997). Organic compounds −1, 3-Butadiene −Benzene −Vinyl chloride −Acrylamide Inorganic compounds −Arsenic −Chromium −Polonium-210 18 The Process of Manufacturing a Modern Cigarette Primary Area—Processing − Increase moisture − Casing application − Redrying process − Cutting process − Humidifying − Final blending Source: Brown and Williamson Tabacco Corporation. Manufacturing in the Factory. Cigarette Manufacturing Operation. Image source: http://www.fas.usda.gov/tobacco/circular/1997/9706/vietnam.htm, 11/2/05 Retrieved June 2000, from http://www.bw.com/4_mfgplant/2_inthefactory/cigmanufact.html 19 The Process of Manufacturing a Modern Cigarette Secondary Area: Fabrication − Cigarette-making machine X Wraps tobacco into paper X Applies adhesive X Cuts to a specified length − Filter rod machine − Cigarette packer Source: Brown and Williamson Tabacco Corporation. Manufacturing in the Factory. Cigarette Manufacturing Operation. Retrieved June 2000, from http://www.bw.com/4_mfgplant/2_inthefactory/cigmanufact.html Image source: http://www.fas.usda.gov/tobacco/circular/ 1997/9706/vietnam.htm, 2/3/06 20 Foundations of Modern Industry 1854—Philip Morris begins making cigarettes in London 1860—348 tobacco factories in North Carolina and Virginia, almost all producing chewing tobacco 1874—Washington Duke builds first factory Image source: www.loc.gov/exhibits/ british/britobje.html, 11/2/05 Continued 21 Foundations of Modern Industry 1878—Liggett & Myers Co. incorporates 1884—J.B. Duke signs contract with Bonsack 1899—R.J. Reynolds incorporates 1901—Imperial Tobacco Group formed in U.K. 1906—Brown and Williamson Tobacco Co. formed 1910—Duke’s American Tobacco Co. controls 92% of world tobacco business 1911—U.S. Supreme Court dissolves Duke’s trust; American Tobacco, R.J. Reynolds, Liggett & Myers, Lorillard, and British American Tobacco emerge 22 Quote “What the [tobacco] industry wants people to believe is that a cigarette is nothing but a natural product grown in the ground, ripped out, stuffed in a piece of paper and served up. It's not. It's a meticulously engineered product. The purpose behind a cigarette . . . is to deliver nicotine— an addictive drug.” − Jeffrey Wigand 23 The Changing Cigarette 1913—Introduction of the American blend 1940s—Change in cigarette length 1954—Introduction of filter tips; reconstituted tobacco added to blend; addition of flavorants 1950s—Porous wrapper in wider use 1960s—Expanded blends reduce total volume; introduction of ammonia technology 1970s—Ventilation and dilution techniques perfected 1980s—Further change in length 1990s—Alternative smoking prototypes Source: Bollinger and Fagerstrom. (1997). 24 The Changing Cigarette: Advertising Image source: http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/tcrb/monographs/5/m5_foreword.pdf retrieved 2/28/06 25 The Changing Cigarette: Advertising Image source: http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/tcrb/monographs/13/m13_7.pdf retrieved 2/28/06 26 The Changing Cigarette: Advertising Image source: http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/tcrb/monographs/13/m13_7.pdf retrieved 2/28/06 27 The Changing Cigarette Tar and Nicotine Content of U.S. Cigarettes, Sales-Weighted Average Basis, 1957– 1987 4.0 1957–Reconstituted Tobacco 1959–Porous Paper 30 3.0 1967—Expanded Tobacco 1971–Ventilation 20 2.0 Tar 10 1.0 Nicotine 0 1955 Sales-Weighted Nicotine (mg) Sales-Weighted tar (mg) 40 0.0 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 Year Source: US Surgeon General Report, 1989 – Update with Monograph 13 28 Sales-Weighted Tar and Nicotine Yields: 1968–1997 Source: US Surgeon General Report, 1989 – Update with Monograph 13 Chart is based on data in Table 2-1, pg 14 of Monograph 13. According to pg 2 of same, figures before 1968 were estimated. 29 How Yields are Measured Federal Trade Commission (FTC) method − Originated in early efforts of tobacco industry researchers to compare cigarettes, when most brands had similar characteristics − Variation in cigarettes over past 30 years necessitated a standard protocol Standardized smoking machine simulates precise manner of smoking (e.g., puff size, puffing rate, puff duration) Labelling conventions based on FTC method − ‘Ultra-Light’ brands yield 1-5 or 6 mg tar − ‘Light’ brands yield 6 or 7-15 mg of tar − ‘Regular/Full-Flavor’ brands yield > 15 mg tar 30 Weakness of the FTC (ISO) Method Does not quantify actual delivery of toxins to smoker due to large variation in individual smokers’ puff profiles Number of ways to increase delivery − Blocking filter air vents with lips/fingers − Increasing puff number and/or volume Continued 31 Cigarette Filters ‘Light’ brands Full flavor brands • Have more filter perforations • Have less filter perforations % filter ventilation = 27.27 % filter ventilation = 12.65 32 Two Reports 1. Clearing the Smoke - Assessing the science base for tobacco harm reduction. Institute of Medicine. 2001. 2. Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machinemeasured yields of tar and nicotine. National Institutes of Health, Monograph 13. October 2001. 33 Additional Information For more information on the industry’s rational for ammonia technology and other changes to cigarettes, see the lecture entitled “Nicotine Addiction” 34 Section B Scientific Discovery and Efforts at Control Early Health Warnings Tobacco and longevity survivorship of white males after 30 years of age according to smoking habits 100 90 Thousands of survivors 80 70 60 Nonsmokers Moderate smokers Heavy smokers 50 40 30 20 10 0 30 40 50 60 70 Age in years 80 90 1938: Dr. Raymond Pearl reports smokers do not live as long as non-smokers Data source: http://medicolegal.tripod.com/pearl1938.htm retrieved 2/26/06 36 Early Health Warnings 1939—Franz Hermann Muller of Germany finds strong dose-response between smoking and lung cancer Image source: http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1117732 retrieved 2/26/06 37 Early Health Warnings Image source: BMJ. 2004 December 18; 329(7480): 1424–1425. Retrieved from http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?tool=pubmed&pubmedid=15604167, 2/7/06. 38 1950: Three Key Case-Control Studies Morton Levin publishes study linking smoking and lung cancer in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA) Ernst L. Wynder and Evarts A.Graham publish study in JAMA in which 96.5% of lung cancer patients interviewed were smokers Richard Doll and Bradford Hill publish study in the British Medical Journal finding that heavy smokers are 50 times more likely to get lung cancer (continued) 39 Evidence Builds 1953—Wynder’s landmark study showed that tobacco painted on the backs of mice produced tumors 1954—Doll and Hill’s study of British doctors published in British Medical Journal 40 Industry Places Nationwide Ad A Frank Statement to Cigarette Smokers “We accept an interest in people’s health as a basic responsibility, paramount to every other consideration in our business.” “We believe the products we make are not injurious to health.” “We always have and always will cooperate closely with those whose task it is to safeguard the public health.” 41 The Industry Reacts Announced formation of Tobacco Industry Research Committee (TIRC) in 1954; later renamed Council for Tobacco Research Launched a campaign of fraud and deceit designed to mislead American people Image source: http://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/tcrb/monographs/5/m5_foreword.pdf retrieved 2/26/06 42 Confidential Philip Morris Memo—1969 The Present Position: Main Evidence Against Smoking “. . . I am going to start by asking you to face certain facts, certain vital statistics . . . The vital statistics I would like you to bear in mind are 7, 57, 139, and 227. . . . They are the death rates per 100,000 per year from cancer of the lung of men who were non-smokers (they are the 7), men who smoked 1–14 cigarettes daily (they are the 57), men who smoked 15–24 cigarettes daily (they are the 139) and men who smoked 25 or more cigarettes daily (they are the 227). . . . Those vital statistics are basically the reason why we are here tonight . . . These vital statistics are really vital. They threaten the life of the tobacco industry in every country of the world.” 43 1st Report of the Surgeon General on Smoking and Health Advisory Committee concluded that cigarette smoking is— − A cause of lung and laryngeal cancer in men − A probable cause of lung cancer in women − The most important cause of chronic bronchitis − “A health hazard of sufficient importance to warrant appropriate remedial action” Surgeon General Luther Terry holding the 1964 Report Source: Centers for Disease Control. History of 1964 Surgeon General’s Report. Retrieved 11/26/02, from http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/30yrsgen.htm 44 From Hypothesis To Publication to Policy Hypothesis: Smoking Causes Lung Cancer Studies: Levin, Wynder, Doll Evidence Evaluation: SGR 1964 Policy: Health Warning on all cigarette packs 1967 45 Reports of the Surgeon General Image source: Institute for Global Tobacco Control 46 Smoking-Caused Diseases Cancers Leukemia—1990 Nasal and Oral Pharynx—1982 Larynx—1980 Esophagus—1982 Lung—1964 Stomach—2001 Pancreas—1990 Kidney—1982 Ureter—1990 Liver—2001 Cervix—2001 Bladder—1990 Chronic Diseases Stroke—1983 Coronary Heart Disease—1979 Aortic Aneurysm— 1983 Atherosclerotic Peripheral Vascular Disease—1983 Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)—1964 Image source: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/sgr/sgr_2004/consumerpiece/page2a.htm, retrieved 2/6/06 47 Age-adjusted Cancer Death rates in Males, US, 1930-2001 Age-adjusted Cancer Death rates in Females, US, 1930-2001 Source: American Cancer Society, Cancer Facts & Figures 2005. http://www.cancer.org/docroot/MED/content/MED_1_1_Most-Requested_Graphs_and_Figures_2005.asp retrieved 2/26/06 48 Effects of Cigarette Smoking on Survival Effects of Cigarette Smoking on Survival to Ages 70 and 85 in 40-Year Prospective Study of Male British Doctors Data source: Doll, Peto, et al. (1994). BMJ. 1994 Oct 8;309(6959):901-11. 49 Mortality Risks and Smoking-Attributable Deaths Changes in Cigarette-Related Mortality Risks and Percentages of Deaths Attributable to Active Cigarette Smoking 50 5000 100 4500 90 4000 80 3500 70 3000 60 Per capita cigarette consumption 2500 50 Male lung cancer death rate 2000 40 1500 30 1000 20 500 10 Age-Adjusted Lung Cancer Death Rates* Per Capita Cigarette Consumption U.S. Age-Adjusted Lung Cancer Death Rate & Cigarette Consumption Female lung cancer death rate 2000 1995 1990 1985 1980 1975 1970 1965 1960 1955 1950 1945 1940 1935 1930 1925 1920 1915 1910 1905 0 1900 0 Year *Age-adjusted to 2000 US standard population. Source: Death rates: US Mortality Public Use Tapes, 1960-2000, US Mortality Volumes, 1930-1959, National Center for Health Statistics, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2002. Cigarette consumption: US Department of Agriculture, 1900-2000. Image retrieved on 2/8/06 from the American Cancer Society: http://www.cancer.org/docroot/PRO/content/PRO_1_1_Cancer_Statistics_2005_Presentation.asp 51 Industry Regarding Addiction in 1994 Seven CEOs of cigarette companies testify before Congress that it is their opinion that nicotine is not addictive Image source: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/hmd/frankenstein/frank_promise.html retrieved 2/8/06 52 Industry Regarding Addiction in 2002 Cigarette smoking and addiction − “We agree with the overwhelming medical and scientific consensus that cigarette smoking is addictive. It can be very difficult to quit smoking, but this should not deter smokers who want to quit from trying to do so.” Source: http://philipmorris.com/default.asp retrieved 2/26/06 53 Industry Regarding Health and Active Smoking in 2002 Cigarette smoking and disease in smokers − “There is an overwhelming medical and scientific consensus that cigarette smoking causes lung cancer, heart disease, emphysema, and other serious diseases in smokers. Smokers are far more likely to develop serious diseases, like lung cancer, than non-smokers. There is no "safe" cigarette. These are and have been the messages of public health authorities worldwide. Smokers and potential smokers should rely on these messages in making all smoking-related decisions.” Source: http://philipmorris.com/default.asp retrieved 2/26/06 54 Secondhand Smoke Image source: Neuroscience of psychoactive substance abuse and dependence, WHO. Accessed from http://www.who.int/substance_abuse/publications/en/Neuroscience.pdf, 2/10/06 55 Hirayama’s Study T. Hirayama. 1990. Lifestyle and mortality: A large-scale census-based cohort study in Japan. Contributions to Epidemiology and Biostatistics Vol. 6. 56 Standard Mortality for Lung Cancer Standard mortality rate for lung cancer per 100,000 40 Cigarette smokers 32-79 30 20 10 Non-smoker Familial passive smoking (+) Non-smoker Familial passive smoking (-) 15-50 8-70 Total 108,906 0 21,895 69,645 (Non-smoker wives of non-smoker husbands) (Non-smoker wives of husbands with smoking habits) 17,366 (Women with smoking habits) Population at enrollment Data source: T. Hirayama. 1990. Contributions to Epidemiology and Biostatistics Vol. 6. 57 1986—Three Key Reports on Secondhand Smoking 1. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans: Tobacco smoking. World Health Organization. 2. Environmental Tobacco Smoke: Measuring exposures and assessing health effects. Medical Research Council 3. The health consequences of involuntary smoking. A report of the Surgeon General. 58 Health Effects of SHS Exposure in Children Sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS) Acute respiratory illnesses (ARI) Chronic respiratory symptoms Reduced lung function growth Asthma and exacerbation of asthma symptoms Acute and chronic middle ear disease 59 Health Effects of SHS Exposure in Adults Established − Lung cancer − Respiratory symptoms − Cardiovascular disease − Exacerbation of asthma Potential − Reduced lung function − Other cancers 60 Secondhand Smoke 1986—Surgeon General’s Report on Passive Smoking 1993—EPA classifies SHS as a “Class A” carcinogen 1994—Canadian scientists report finds evidence of cigarette smoke in fetal hair 1998—California becomes first state to ban smoking in bars 61 The Industry Counterattack Discount science Maintain controversy Hire consultants Produce counter-science 62 Industry vs. Science “The massive effort launched across the tobacco industry against one scientific study is remarkable.” Source: Ong, E. K. and Glantz, S. A. (2000, April 8). Tobacco industry efforts subverting International Agency for Research on Cancer’s second-hand smoke study. The Lancet 355 (9211): 1253–1259. 63 The Attack on Meta-Analysis Tweedie, R.L. & K.L. Mengersen. 1995. Meta-analytic approaches to doseresponse relationships, with application in studies of lung cancer and exposure to environmental tobacco smoke. Statistics in Medicine 14: 545-569. Excerpt from Acknowledgements – “The paper was completed at Colorado State University, with partial support from several tobacco companies; the methods and analysis here are however entirely those of the authors and should not be otherwise ascribed.” Bailar, J.C. 1997. The promise and problems of meta-analysis. New England Journal of Medicine 337 (8): 559-61. Fleiss, J.L. & A.J. Gross. 1991. Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 44 (2): 127-139. Excerpt from Acknowledgements – “This research was supported by a grant from The Tobacco Institute, Washington, D.C., USA. We thank Dr Myron Weinberg, President of the Weinberg Group/WASHTECH, for encouraging us to develop this critique.” 64 Undermining Epidemiology Principles for evaluating epidemiologic data in regulatory risk assessment. Developed by an expert panel at a conference in London, England, October 1995. Federal Focus, Inc. Milloy, S.J. 1995. Science without sense. The risky business of public health research. Cato Institute, Washington D.C. 65 Counter-Science Junkscience.com “All the junk that’s fit to debunk” Articles: - Secondhand smokescreen - Passive smoke – the EPA’s betrayal of science 66 U.K. House of Commons Health Committee “It seems to us that the companies have sought to undermine the scientific consensus until such time as that position appears ridiculous. So the companies now generally accept that smoking is dangerous (but put forward distracting arguments to suggest that epidemiology is not an exact science, so that the figures for those killed by tobacco may be exaggerated); are equivocal about nicotine's addictiveness; and are still attempting to undermine the argument that passive smoking is dangerous.” [bold added] − U.K. House of Commons Health Committee Source: (May 2001). Trust Us: We’re the Tobacco Industry. Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids. (U.S.) and Action on Smoking and Health. (U.K.) 67 Section C The Spread of the Tobacco Epidemic in the U.S. The Spread of the Tobacco Epidemic in the U.S. 1776—“I say, if you can’t send money, send tobacco.” − George Washington’s request to help finance the American Revolutionary War 1861–65—During the U.S. Civil War, tobacco given with rations; many Northerners introduced to tobacco Continued 69 The Spread of the Tobacco Epidemic in the U.S. 1900—Four billion cigarettes sold in U.S. 1914–18—Cigarettes included with war rations 1923—Camel has 45% of U.S. market 1924—Philip Morris introduces Marlboro as a women’s cigarette Image source: http://memory.loc.gov/ammem/awhhtml/awgc1/periodicals.html retrieved 2/9/06 Continued 70 The Spread of the Tobacco Epidemic in the U.S. 1939—Sixty-six percent of U.S. males younger than forty are smokers 1939–45—During World War II, cigarettes included in rations; Roosevelt makes tobacco a protected crop 1940—U.S. per capita cigarette consumption has doubled since 1930 to 2,558 per year 1948—Lung cancer increasing five times faster than other cancers (now second most common) 1954—Marlboro cowboy campaign created for Philip Morris Continued 71 The Spread of the Tobacco Epidemic in the U.S. 1956—Lung cancer death rate among U.S. white males is 31/100,000 1964—Marlboro Country ad campaign launched; sales rise ten percent per year 1969—R.J. Reynolds sponsors Winston Cup NASCAR races 1981—Annual U.S. consumption peaks at 640 billion cigarettes 72 Yearly per Capita Cigarette Consumption Sources: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Tobacco use – United States, 1900-1999. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report 1999;48(43):986; Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Marketing and Trade Economics Division, Specialty Crops Branch, unpublished data; Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Outlook. Washington (DC): Department of Agriculture, Economic 73 Research Service, 2001. USDA Publication No. ERS-AO-278. NIH Overall, lung cancer incidence rates decreased 1.6 percent per year between 1992 and 1998, due mainly to a decline of 2.7 percent per year in men and a leveling off of rates in women, both manifestations of reductions in tobacco smoking since the 1960s. Source: National Institutes of Health. (2001). 74 U.S. Tobacco Industry Litigation 1954—First tobacco liability suit − Pritchard vs. Liggett & Meyers (dropped by plaintiff 12 years later) 1954—Philip Morris hires David R. Hardy as lawyer (begins relationship with Shook, Hardy & Bacon Law Firm) 1963—Seven liability suits filed 1964—17 liability suits filed Continued 75 U.S. Tobacco Industry Litigation 1994—Minnesota first state to sue the tobacco industry; Philip Morris files $10 billion libel suit against ABC for Day One report 1995—Supreme Court orders the release of confidential industry documents Continued 76 U.S. Tobacco Industry Litigation 1997—Attorneys General and tobacco companies come to historic settlement—U.S. $206 billion over the next 25 years 1997—Flight attendants suing for suffering caused by secondhand smoke settle with industry for $300 million 77 Section D The Global Epidemic The Global Tobacco Health Burden Single most important cause of preventable death in the world Projected to be leading cause of death by 2020s—one in eight deaths Predicted to kill 500,000,000 people alive today 79 DALYs Attributable to Diarrhea, HIV, and Tobacco Adapted from The Global Burden of Disease http://www.hsph.harvard.edu/organizations/bdu/GBDseries_files/gbdsumintro.pdf accessed 2/9/06 80 The Global Tobacco Health Burden Kills four million a year, expected to kill 8.4 million a year by 2020 One in two long-term smokers killed by their addiction Half of the deaths occur in middle-ages (35–69) Source: Peto and Lopez. (2001). Continued 81 The Global Tobacco Health Burden 70% of tobacco deaths in the 2020s will be in developing countries (DC) 1990—70% Tobacco Agriculture in DC 2000—70% Tobacco Consumption in DC 2020—70% Tobacco Deaths in DC 82 Regional Attributable Mortality—2020 Africa and Middle East—1.1 million China—2.2 million India—1.5 million Latin America/Caribbean—450,000 Source: WHO Tobacco Free Initiative. 83 The Global Tobacco Burden—Women Closing gender gap—over 236 million women smoke globally Only ≈ 3% of women in Southeast Asia smoke cigarettes High exposure to secondhand smoke Continued 84 The Global Tobacco Burden—Women Estimated Smoking Prevalence by Gender and Number of Smokers in Populations Aged 15 or More, by World Bank Region, 1995 Smoking Prevalence (%) Total Smokers Percentage World Bank Region Males Females Overall Millions of Smokers East Asia and Pacific 59 4 32 401 35 Eastern Europe and 59 26 41 148 13 Central Asia Latin America and 40 21 30 95 8 Caribbean Middle East and 44 5 25 40 3 North Africa South Asia (cigarettes) 20 1 11 86 8 South Asia (bidis) 20 3 12 96 8 Sub-Saharan Africa 33 10 21 67 6 Low/Middle Income 49 9 29 933 82 High Income 39 22 30 209 18 World 47 12 29 1,142 100 Note: Numbers have been rounded. Source: Author’s calculations based on World Health Organization (1997), Tobacco or health: A Global Status Report, Geneva, Switzerland. Continued 85 The Global Tobacco Burden—Women “No discussion of the tobacco industry in the year 2000 would be complete without addressing what may be the most important feature on the landscape, the China market. In every aspect, China confounds the imagination.” Source: Philip Morris—regarding women in China. (1986). 86 The Global Tobacco Burden—Youth Every day 80,000 to 100,000 youths become regular smokers One-fifth of young people begin before they are ten years old High exposure to secondhand smoke Predicted to kill 250 million children and adolescents alive today 87 Global Youth Tobacco Survey (GYTS) Percentage of Students Currently Using Any Form of Tobacco 59 60 58 50 40 34 33 27 30 20 41 40 19 35 33 23 18 10 Bu en os Ai Bo re liv s B ia ah (C a oc ma ha s Ch ba ile m ba (C oq ) ui m bo ) Cu ba In di a (B ih ar ) Po Pa Ru la la ss nd u ia n (Ur Fe ba d n (M era ) So osc tion ut ow h ) Af Uk ric ra a in e (K Un ie v) ite d St at es 0 Data source: http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/global/GYTS.htm retrieved 2/26/06 88 The Global Tobacco Burden—The Poor Smoking Prevalence Smoking Prevalence among Men in Chennai, India, by Education Levels 64% 60% 58% 42% 40% 21% 20% 0% Illiterate <6 Years 6-12 Years >12 Years Length of Schooling Source: Gajalakshmi, C. K., P. Jha, S. Nguyen, and A. Yurekli. Patterns of Tobacco Use and Health Consequences. Background paper. Accessed from http://www1.worldbank.org/tobacco/book/pdf/02-Tobacco-Chap1.pdf on 2/10/06. 89 Spreads Worldwide Through . . . Trade liberalization Direct foreign investment by industry Advertising and marketing by industry 90 Top Tobacco Companies’ Global Market Share, 1999 Other Companies Combined 27% China National Tobacco Corp 25% Reemstma 2% Japan Tobacco 13% British American Tobacco 16% Philip Morris 17% Data sources: The Tobacco Industry Factsheet No.18 http://www.ash.org.uk/html/factsheets/pdfs/fact18.pdf, The World Health Report 1999 http://www.who.int/whr/1999/en/whr99_ch5_en.pdf retrieved 2/10/06 91 Total World Cigarette Production in Trillions, 1950–1998 Source: US Department of Agriculture. Accessed from http://www.ash.org.uk/html/international/pdfs/globaltrends.pdf on 2/10/06 92 Total World Cigarette Production in Trillions, 1950–1998 = US Consumption Rates Source: US Department of Agriculture. Accessed from http://www.ash.org.uk/html/international/pdfs/globaltrends.pdf on 2/10/06 93 Quote “Tobacco exports should be expanded aggressively, because Americans are smoking less.” − Vice President Dan Quayle, 1990 94 Philip Morris International Tobacco Operations 35 Billions of Dollars 30 25 20 15 10 Revenues 5 0 Profits 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 Data source: http://www.altria.com/investors/02_01_AnnualReport.asp accessed 2/10/06 95