Economic Risks from an Invasive Species in the Black Sea Presented by Duncan Knowler School of Resource and Environmental Management Simon Fraser University 1 Overview • Case study background: Black Sea problem • Management objectives • Basic relationships and assumptions • Stochastic process: invasive spp outbreaks • Risk analysis using a bioeconomic model • Implications of alternative trigger mechanisms • Conclusions: risk analysis aspects 2 3 Problem definition • Black Sea drains 50% of Europe; major tributary is the Danube River • It is subject to severe environmental pressures, e.g. eutrophication, toxics, overfishing, etc. • Invasion of the Black Sea by the comb jelly “Mnemiopsis leidyi” • Cumulative impact on fisheries (e.g. anchovy) from all pressures has been substantial • Coordination of several riparian countries to address problems is difficult 4 The Comb Jelly “Mnemiopsis leidyi” 5 Management objectives • Need to address pollution pressures, especially nutrient loads, and fisheries management • Some fish species (e.g. anchovy) have a complex interaction with nutrients, a ‘mixed blessing’ effect • What triggers stochastic Mnemiopsis events: sea temperature or nutrient loads? • Critical to assess the influence of nutrient abatement policies under alternative triggering assumptions • What escapement policy is optimal for modeling? • Response is to model this system using a stochastic bioeconomic modeling approach 6 Description of system processes 7 Relationship Between Nutrients, Mnemiopsis and Anchovy Population Dynamics (+) (-) Key uncertainties: 1. What triggers Mnemiopsis outbreaks? • Sea temperatures or nutrient load? 2. What should the escapement level be for the anchovy stock? • Constant escapement optimal? ? 8 Some key modeling assumptions • Recurring Mnemiopsis outbreaks have identical impacts on the anchovy stock • Outbreaks are determined by a time-varying random threshold or trigger • Fishery managers know relevant probability distributions and magnitudes and are risk neutral • Whether an outbreak will occur is unknown until after fish escapement is decided for that period • Management is evaluated using expected economic profits from the anchovy harvest, as determined by an optimization procedure 9 Stochastic process • Stochastic transition equation: where X is anchovy stock, S is anchovy escapement, P is phosphates and σi, Ri(S,P) are survival and recruitment under state of the world i • State i = 1 is normal conditions while i = 2 refers to an outbreak. [Note: derivative RP > 0] • Stochastic variable Zt is the unknown threshold at time t that triggers a Mnemiopsis outbreak • Consider (i) sea surface temperature and (ii) nutrient level as triggering mechanisms 10 • Following expression describes the probability mass function governing the stochastic transition equation: • Denote the first probability as Λ(Pt,Tt) and the second as Φ(Pt,Tt) • It follows that Λ(Pt,Tt) = 1 - Φ(Pt,Tt), Φ’ = f(Zt) > 0 and Λ’ = -f(Zt) < 0. 11 Black Sea anchovy-Mnemiopsis model and nutrient abatement implies: 12 Nutrient abatement under alternative triggering mechanisms 1. Sea temperature 2. Nutrients 13 Results for Stochastic Model for Varying Mean Threshold Values, Assuming 50% Impact of Mnemiopsis and a 50% Nutrient Abatement Policy (P = 2.75 µM; US$ 1989/90) No Nutrient Abatement Mean Thres –hold (1) Outbreak probability (2) Optimal escapement ('000 t) 50% Nutrient Abatement (3) Expected profits ($'000/yr) (4) Outbreak probability (5) Optimal escapement ('000 t) (6) Expected profits ($'000/yr) (6) – (3) Benefits of abatement ($'000/yr) Sea Surface Temperature Triggers Outbreaks 3.0°C 0.66 1233 7106 0.66 1082 5736 (1370) 3.5°C 0.60 1259 7887 0.60 1116 6405 (1482) 4.0°C 0.55 1281 8581 0.55 1146 7001 (1580) Nutrient Loads Trigger Outbreaks 3 µM 0.84 1153 4779 0.60 1232 6393 1614 6 µM 0.60 1258 7874 0.37 1338 9438 1564 9 µM 0.46 1325 9981 0.26 1387 10,962 981 14 Conclusions: risk analysis aspects • Indicators of risk ‘Expected value’ analysis • List of management options Unspecified pollution control policies • Uncertainties analyzed quantitatively? Key uncertainty is the triggering mechanism • Ways of taking into account uncertainties about inputs to the analysis Used exponential distribution to model risk • Analysis of sensitivity of conclusions Varied key parameter values 15 Thank You School of Resource and Environmental Management Simon Fraser University 16