9th Grade Math Benchmarks
Benchmark 1 (133)
Benchmark 2 (175)
Benchmark 3(128)
54% 55%
49%
48%
38%
33%
13%
7%
2%
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
0%
0%
Tier 4
0%
10th Grade Math Benchmarks
Benchmark 1(74)
Benchmark 2 (57)
Benchmark 3 (57)
65%
61%
54%
46%
37%
35%
0%
Tier 1
Tier 2
2%
Tier 3
0%
0%
0
Tier 4
0%
11th Grade Math Benchmarks
Benchmark 1 (52)
Benchmark 2 (33)
Benchmark 3 (52)
69%
55%
45%
29%
0
Tier 1
0
Tier 2
2%
0%
Tier 3
0
0%
0%
Tier4
0
9th Grade English Benchmarks
Benchmark 1(161)
Benchmark 2(215)
Benchmark 3(181)
56%
46%
44%
40%
38%
24%
19%
6%
10% 9%
7%
1%
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
10th Grade Math Benchmarks
Benchmark 1 (127)
Benchmark 2 (150)
Benchmark 3 (40)
60%
44% 45%
40%
37%
25%
15%
13%
9%
6%
6%
0%
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
11th Grade English Benchmarks
Benchmark 1 (186)
Benchmark 2(88)
Benchmark 3(181)
60%
45%
39%
35%
31%
29%
26%
16%
12%
8%
0%
Tier 1
Tier 2
Tier 3
Tier 4
0%
9th Grade WV Writes Data
Prompt 1 (120)
3.2
3.1
3 2.9
2.9 2.9
2.5
Organization
Prompt 2 (40)
Prompt 3 (112)
Prompt 4 (39)
3.5
3.4
3.2
3.1
2.7
3.1
2.8
2.7
2.9
3.3
2.9
3.1
2.4
Development
Sentence
Structure
Grammar Usage
Mechanics
10th Grade WV Writes Data
Prompt 1 (44)
3.5
3.7
3.4
3.1
Organization
3.6
Prompt 2 (43)
3.8
3.8
3.4
Prompt 3 (47)
3.9
3.6 3.5 3.5
3.1
Development
Sentence
Structure
Prompt 4 (40)
3.9 3.8 3.8
3.7
3.3
3.5
Grammar Usage
3.7
Mechanics
11th Grade WV Writes Data
Prompt 1 (90)
3.5
3.4
3
Prompt 2 (114)
3.1 3.1
Organization
3.1
3.2
3
Development
3.1
3.3
Prompt 3 (41)
3.1 3.2
Sentence
Structure
Prompt 4 (76)
3.2 3.3 3.1 3.3
Grammar Usage
3.5 3.6 3.4 3.6
Mechanics
9th Grade English Intervention 1st Semester
70
60
50
40
Pre-Test
30
Post-Test
20
10
0
CSO
9.1.02
CSO
9.1.05
CSO
9.1.06
CSO
9.1.07
CSO
9.1.08
CSO
9.1.010
9th Grader English Intervention 2nd Semester
60
50
40
Pre-Test
30
Post-Test
20
10
CSO 9.1.02
CSO 9.1.05
CSO 9.1.06
CSO 9.1.010
10th Grade English Intervention 1st Semester
90
80
70
60
50
Pre-Test
40
Post-Test
30
20
10
0
CSO
10.1.02
CSO
10.1.05
CSO
10.1.06
CSO
10.1.07
CSO
10.1.08
CSO
10.1.09
CSO
10.1.10
10th Grade English Intervention 2nd Semester
80
70
60
50
Pre-Test
40
Post-Test
30
20
10
0
CSO 10.1.02
CSO 10.1.05
CSO 10.1.06
CSO 10.1.010
11th Grade English Intervention 1st Semester
120
100
80
60
Pre-Test
Post-Test
40
20
0
CSO
11.1.02
CSO
11.1.05
CSO
11.1.06
CSO
11.1.07
CSO
11.1.08
CSO
11.1.09
CSO
11.1.10
11th Grade English Intervention 2nd Semester
80
70
60
50
Pre-Test
40
Post-Test
30
20
10
0
CSO 11.1.02
CSO 11.1.05
CSO 11.1.06
CSO 11.1.010
9th Grade Math Intervention
100
90
80
70
60
Pre-Test
50
Post-Test
40
30
20
10
0
A1.2.05
A1.2.07
A1.2.18
A1.2.20
A1.2.02
10th Grade Math Intervention
100
90
80
70
60
Pre-Test
50
Post-Test
40
30
20
10
0
G3.01
G3.02
G3.03
G3.05
G3.06
11th Grade Math Intervention
100
90
80
70
60
Pre-Test
50
Post-Test
40
30
20
10
0
A1.2.10
A1.2.07
G3.02
A1.2.09
A1.2.02
May 2010
IPI Visit Results
50%
45%
43%
40%
35%
32%
30%
25%
20%
15%
19%
18%
16%
16%
13%
10%
12%
9%
5%
9%
9%
3%
0%
1
2
3
4
Core
Non Core
5
6
IPI Data
45%
40%
35%
30%
25%
20%
15%
10%
5%
0%
1
2
November
3
February
4
March
5
April
6
25
64
62
20
60
58
15
56
54
10
52
50
5
48
0
9th
10th
2010
11th
2011
12th
46
Overall
2010
2011
2010 WESTEST 2 Results
(% above mastery)
35
30
31
28
25
24
20
24
23
15
10
5
0
Math
Read/Language Arts
9th
10th
11th
25
Discipline
25
Referrals per Day
20
15
10
5
0
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr







Develop relationships and caring atmosphere
Greet students
Music in the hallways and classroom
Utilize the four questions
Utilize “Foul” and Affirmation
“Good News”
Be aware of “smoke screens”
Culture Survey
2009-2010
3.91
4.11
3.76
3.26
3.19
Collaborative
Teacher
Leadership Factor Collaboration factor
3.91
Professional
Development
Factor
2010-2011
4.07
3.87
3.69
Unity of Purpose
Factor
3.91
2.75
2.73
Collegial Support
Learning
Factor
Partnerships Factor
3.65
3.46
Efficacy Factor

Number of new faculty to our building:
21 teachers
 2 Assistant Principals (A third added in February)
 2 home/school liaison
 1 clerk
 1 Special Education Specialist
 1 Counselor
 5 Custodians
 2 Interventionist (1 was not hired until February)


High Number of Teacher Evaluations: 29

6 long-term substitutes

Substitute Shortage

Monitoring Initiatives

Attendance
Currently 85%
 Home School Liaison
 Incentives
 Revised Discipline


Offer to 12 Students

9 Students Originally Enrolled

5 Students Remain

Two Teachers

Kanawha County Schools has been extremely
supportive in our efforts this year.
Graduation Coach
 ALC Position
 ½ Day Floating Substitute
 Additional Administrator



Clubs
New schedule









Built in collaboration
Built in Intervention time
Stronger focus on Benchmark use and analysis
Multi-Year Consistent Profession Development
Focus
Focus on strengthening our processes
Focused Mission/Vision statements
Electronic Walk-throughs
Teacher Leaders
21st Century Counseling (Professional
Development)