District Annual Determinations
2015
IDEA Part B
Sections 616(a) and (e)
A State must consider the following four factors:
1. Performance on compliance indicators;
2. Valid and reliable data;
3. Correction of identified noncompliance;
4. And other data available to the State about the LEA’s
compliance, including relevant audit findings.
In addition, States may consider results on performance
indicators and other information.
Part B Results Matrix
State Performance
Plan (SPP) Target
Part B Results Indicators
SWD State
Average
Score
LEA
Percentage
Indicator 1: Graduation
67.08%
70.25%
71.32%
1
Indicator 2: Drop Out
2.45%
1.47%
1.14%
1
Indicator 3b: Participation Rate/Reading
95.00%
97.89%
98.27%
1
Indicator 3b: Participation Rate/Math
95.00%
97.80%
98.14%
1
Indicator 3c: Assessment Data/Reading Proficiency
32.90%
16.12%
23.80%
1
Indicator 3c: Assessment Data/Math Proficiency
35.70%
17.56%
24.34%
1
Indicator 4a: Suspension/Expulsion (more than 10 days)
< 3.28%
< 3.28%
0.24%
1
Indicator 5a: Educational Environment General Education
Full Time (6-21)
62.50%
64.00%
56.50%
0
Indicator 5b: Educational Environment Separate Class (6-21)
8.90%
8.20%
11.68%
0
Indicator 5c: Educational Environment
1.40%
1.74%
2.62%
0
Indicator 6a: Preschool Environments (Regular Early
Childhood Program)
29.80%
26.16%
4.82%
0
Indicator 6b: Preschool Environments (Separate Special
Education)
10.60%
9.45%
19.28%
0
A1. 78.00%
81.68%
88.68%
½
A2. 67.00%
67.34%
53.13%
0
B1. 78.00%
81.55%
88.24%
½
B2. 63.00%
63.49%
51.13%
0
C1. 79.00%
83.54%
91.49%
½
C2. 78.00%
77.90%
67.19%
0
Indicator 8: Parent Involvement
33.00%
31.63%
Indicator 14c: Higher Education/PostSecondary/Competitively Employed
64.00%
64.89%
Indicator 7a: Preschool Outcomes (Social-Emotional Skills)
½
Indicator 7b: Preschool Outcomes (Knowledge & Skills)
½
Indicator 7c: Preschool Outcomes (Appropriate Behavior)
Results Points Available
½
72.97%
1
Results Points Earned
Results Performance
9.5
59% Needs Assistance
16
Part B Compliance Matrix
State Performance
Plan
(SPP) Target
SWD State
Average
LEA
Percentage
Correction of
Findings
Score
Indicator 4b: Suspension by Race/Ethnicity
0.00%
3.51%
Met
N/A
2
Indicator 9: Disproportionality/All Disabilities
0.00%
0.00%
Met
N/A
2
Indicator 10: Disproportionality/Specific Disabilities
0.00%
0.00%
Met
Indicator 11:Initial Evaluation Timelines
100.00%
97.28%
96.85%
Indicator 12: Preschool Transition
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
Indicator 13: Secondary Transition
100.00%
98.41%
Correction of Noncompliance
100.00%
Part B Compliance Indicators
0% or 100%
Timely and Accurate Data
Compliance Points
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
Available
16
100.00%
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
2
2
2
2
2
2
Compliance Points Earned
Compliance Performance
16
100% Meets Requirements
Results Driven Accountability Percentage and Determination
32
25.5
80% Meets Requirements
District Annual Determinations
50% Results (16 points available)
50% Compliance (16 points available)
32 points total
District Annual Determinations
80% and above Meets Requirements
Below 80% Needs Assistance
Districts will receive a Letter of Findings for Compliance
Indicators below 100%
Scoring for Results Indicators
Part B Results Indicators 1, 2, 3b, 3c, 4a, 5a, 5b, 5c, 6a,
6b, 7a, 7b, 7c and 14c
*Indicator 8 will have the LEA’s percentage listed for those included in the
Parent Survey; however, no score will be given
• 1 point for meeting the State Average and/or the State
Target
• 0 points if the percentage does not meet the State
Average or State Target
Scoring of Compliance Matrix Indicators
Part B Compliance Indicators 4b, 9 and 10
• Two Points: The LEA’s data were valid and reliable and no
significant discrepancy or no disproportionate representation was
identified (indicating “Met” in the box); or
• The LEA’s data reflect a significant discrepancy or disproportionate
representation; however, the mandatory review revealed no
noncompliance of policies, procedures and practices (indicating
“Met” in the box).
• Zero Points: The LEA’s data reflects a significant discrepancy or
disproportionate representation and the mandatory review revealed
noncompliance of policies, procedures and practices (indicating “Not
Met” in the box).
Scoring of Compliance Matrix Indicators
Part B Compliance Indicators 11, 12 and 13
• 2 points if percentage is at 95% or above
• 2 points if percentage is at 90% or above and
correction of findings were made from the prior year
indicating a “Yes” in the Correction of Findings box
• 1 point if percentage is at 90%-95% and no prior
findings were identified indicating a “NA” in the
Correction of Findings box
• 0 points if percentage is below 90%
Scoring of Correction of Noncompliance
• Two Points: If the LEA corrected all noncompliance no
later than one year from the date of identification.
• One Point: If the LEA corrected all but one indicator
with noncompliance no later than one year from the date
of identification.
• Zero Points: If the LEA continues to have more than
one indicator with noncompliance that has not been
corrected within one year from the date of identification.
Scoring of Timely and Accurate Data
• Two Points: If the LEA reports (All 618 and SPP/APR
Reports; LEA Application, ADA Submission and Second
Month Report) were valid and reliable and within the
specified timeline.
• One Point: If the LEA submitted all but one report that
was valid and reliable within the specified timeline.
• Zero Points: If the LEA did not submit two or more
reports within the specified timelines.
Letters to Superintendents
Annual Determination letters and scored rubric will be
mailed May 30, 2015.
Letters of Findings on Compliance Indicators will be mailed
May 30, 2015.
Correction of Findings for Compliance Indicators must be
corrected on or before May 30, 2016.
ADA Improvement Plan Rubric
Criteria
1.
The SPP Indicator
identified, as not
met is listed.
2.The explanation of
slippage including trend
data provides a clear
description/reason for the
slippage.
3.Areas for improvement
have a logical sequence of
events/activities including
action steps necessary to
correct noncompliance
and/or improve results.
4.The improvement plan
clearly identifies who will
be responsible for each
activity.
5. The plan includes an
evaluation component
which specifies
methods to measure
and verify the
effectiveness of the
activities.
Compliant
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Yes / No
Reviewer Comments
Please direct questions regarding Annual
Determinations to
Pat Homberg (phomberg@k12.wv.us) or
Susan Beck (sbeck@k12.wv.us)
Thank You!