PSSP PENALTIES & OPPORTUNITIES PROFESSIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL RATIO CALCULATION OF THE RATIO Step 1 of the PSSP (Public School Support Program) determines the amount of state aid funding for professional educators (PE) based on each district’s net student enrollment, their population density, and the actual degree levels and years of experience of professional educators reported on the certified list. In addition, each school district is required to maintain a minimum ratio of professional instructional (PI) personnel per 1,000 students in net enrollment. The minimum ratio is calculated based on the district’s net enrollment and the population density. If this ratio is not maintained, the districts will have a pro rata reduction of their Step 1 allowance. There is an exception that exempts districts with an increase in net enrollment from the penalty. There was also an exception that exempted all districts from being penalized during the five-year phase-in of the new funding formula. Now that new funding formula is completely phased in, effective for the FY14 final computations, the PI penalty will return. Districts need to ensure that they have adequate professional instructional staffing as of their FY13 Certified List so they are not penalized for FY14. IMPORTANT DEFINITIONS Professional Educator (WVC §18-9A-2) - Personnel employed by a board of education as a teacher, supervisor, principal, superintendent, public school librarian, public school nurse with a bachelor’s degree who is licensed by the State board of examiners for registered professional nurses, or any other person regularly employed for instructional purposes in a public school in the State. Professional Instructional Personnel (WVC §18-9A-2) - A professional educator employed by a board of education whose regular duty is that of a classroom teacher (including speech language pathologist), librarian, counselor, attendance director, school psychologist, or school nurse with a bachelor’s degree and licensed as a registered nurse. ***Please note that the certified list instructions place symbols by each position code identifying the professional instructional positions. FINAL COMPUTATIONS PUBLIC SCHOOL SUPPORT PROGRAM PROFESSIONAL INSTRUCTIONAL PERSONNEL DATA FOR THE 2012-13 YEAR County 2011-12 Net Enrollment Student With Total Population Adjustments Density Proration Professional Multi-County Professional Instructional Vocational Instructional Employed Centers Chargeable PI Required 66.26 66.20 66.10 66.00 -S -L -M -H Under PI Limits Without Considering Enrollment Under PI Limits Counties Without Enroll Increase Barbour Berkeley Boone Braxton Brooke 2,449.02 17,742.40 4,548.50 2,155.20 3,303.60 Low High Low Sparse High 158.43 1,210.75 359.50 150.76 234.19 1.17 (6.99) - 159.60 1,203.76 359.50 150.76 234.19 162.12 1,171.00 301.11 142.80 218.04 (2.52) - (2.52) - Cabell Calhoun Clay Doddridge Fayette 12,872.90 1,218.87 2,047.00 1,234.66 6,876.81 High Sparse Low Sparse Medium 877.15 84.20 139.30 89.75 475.00 (5.52) 2.10 - 877.15 78.68 139.30 91.85 475.00 849.61 80.76 135.51 81.81 454.56 (2.08) - - Gilmer Grant Greenbrier Hampshire Hancock 1,140.38 1,873.90 5,300.54 3,591.13 4,316.70 Sparse Sparse Low Low High 71.00 127.50 368.00 240.79 293.00 5.52 (3.89) - 76.52 123.61 368.00 240.79 293.00 75.56 124.16 350.90 237.73 284.90 (0.55) - (0.55) - Hardy Harrison Jackson Jefferson Kanawha 2,278.20 11,040.20 4,994.95 8,688.25 27,958.90 Sparse High Medium High High 145.40 799.10 350.45 616.00 2,010.41 2.04 (2.86) (4.99) 3.57 - 147.44 796.24 345.46 619.57 2,010.41 150.95 728.65 330.17 573.42 1,845.29 (3.51) - (3.51) - Lewis Lincoln Logan Marion Marshall 2,625.45 3,681.00 6,397.20 7,932.55 4,718.63 Low Low Medium High Medium 181.20 271.00 429.58 565.33 350.01 184.51 271.00 429.58 565.33 350.01 173.80 243.68 422.85 523.55 311.90 - - Mason McDowell Mercer Mineral Mingo 4,272.90 3,532.23 9,595.22 4,280.71 4,479.50 Low Low High Medium Medium 304.39 245.50 648.50 291.75 312.88 304.39 245.50 648.50 291.75 312.88 282.87 233.83 633.28 282.96 296.09 - - Monongalia Monroe Morgan Nicholas Ohio 10,937.01 1,874.90 2,542.57 4,061.50 5,435.70 High Sparse Medium Low High 708.00 132.93 179.07 284.25 368.10 3.42 - 708.00 132.93 182.49 284.25 368.10 721.84 124.23 168.06 268.87 358.76 (13.84) - - Pendleton Pleasants Pocahontas Preston Putnam 1,333.41 1,274.80 1,400.00 4,596.60 9,751.75 Sparse Low Sparse Low High 84.44 101.12 92.19 316.21 663.10 1.85 (5.99) - 86.29 95.13 92.19 316.21 663.10 88.35 84.39 92.76 304.29 643.62 (2.06) (0.57) - - 12,351.65 4,252.15 1,535.20 2,476.45 1,564.00 High Sparse Sparse Low Sparse 809.00 301.44 112.50 161.41 105.50 2.32 4.99 - 809.00 301.44 114.82 166.40 105.50 815.21 281.75 101.72 163.94 103.63 (6.21) - - 2,384.00 1,228.95 1,404.15 3,868.25 7,433.80 Medium Sparse Low Medium Medium 159.50 79.79 102.39 271.55 509.15 0.76 1.32 (4.48) - 160.26 79.79 103.71 267.07 509.15 157.58 81.43 92.95 255.69 491.37 (1.64) - - 1,490.00 2,856.25 1,114.30 13,423.58 4,235.45 Sparse Low Sparse High Low 109.50 209.00 72.81 915.50 297.25 2.35 - 109.50 211.35 72.81 915.50 297.25 98.73 189.08 73.83 885.96 280.39 (1.02) - - 19,546.52 0.00 19,546.52 18,632.29 (34.00) (6.58) Raleigh Randolph Ritchie Roane Summers Taylor Tucker Tyler Upshur Wayne Webster Wetzel Wirt Wood Wyoming State 281,973.91 3.31 - OSF 03/16/12 COMPS13 - 12 - ALTERNATIVE FUEL ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCE CALCULATION OF THE ADDITIONAL ALLOWANCE Under Step 4 of the PSSP, each district can receive an additional allowance of 10% of the actual expenditures for operations, maintenance, and contracted services, exclusive of salaries, for the portion of the bus fleet that uses alternative fuels. Per WV Code §18-9A-7, alternative fuel examples include “compressed natural gas or other acceptable alternative fuels.” Biodiesel is the most common alternative fuel utilized by districts. This portion of the bus fleet using alternative fuels is based on the certified mileage reports from the County Transportation Directors. The percentage of alternative fuel mileage to total mileage is applied to the already calculated allowance for operations, maintenance and contracted services, exclusive of salaries. That allowance is calculated by taking the total actual expenditures for each district (from the most recent completed fiscal year) and applies the population density percentage (95% sparse, 92.5% low, 90% medium, and 87.5% high). MISSED FUNDING Based on the FY13 Comps, there were several counties that did not take advantage of the opportunity for this additional alternative fuel funding. Statewide, approximately $1.2 million was left on the table. See the attached schedule for a county by county breakdown. OTHER ADVANTAGES OF USING ALTERNATIVE FUEL Reduced emissions/better air quality Increased US energy security Elimination of cold start problems (propane) Longer engine life of up to two times that of gasoline engines (propane) COUNTY BOARDS OF EDUCATION FY 13 MISSED PSSP ALTERNATIVE FUEL FUNDING BASED ON THE FY13 FINAL COMPUTATIONS County Barbour Berkeley Boone Braxton Brooke Cabell Calhoun Clay Doddridge Fayette Gilmer Grant Greenbrier Hampshire Hancock Hardy Harrison Jackson Jefferson Kanawha Lewis Lincoln Logan Marion Marshall Mason McDowell Mercer Mineral Mingo Monongalia Monroe Morgan Nicholas Ohio Pendleton Pleasants Pocahontas Preston Putnam Raleigh Randolph Ritchie Roane Summers Taylor Tucker Tyler Upshur Wayne Webster Wetzel Wirt Wood Wyoming Total Operation, Maintenance, & Contracted Services @ 100% Maximum Add'l Allowance Oper & Maint. For Alt. Fuel Buses (Add'l 10%) 369,804 3,643,516 982,044 362,183 636,109 1,462,040 306,836 661,440 380,332 1,219,971 175,413 246,878 871,770 586,036 864,647 396,159 1,325,373 808,627 1,369,953 3,065,221 476,610 973,953 1,429,209 1,305,518 867,604 635,540 865,335 1,463,183 1,174,123 851,760 1,922,244 305,317 521,806 906,945 911,460 301,813 261,509 292,659 1,025,448 1,378,514 2,572,325 661,516 285,172 510,691 260,564 371,438 233,198 419,498 621,283 1,703,815 430,795 824,485 174,026 1,723,817 863,708 49,261,233 36,980 364,352 98,204 36,218 63,611 146,204 30,684 66,144 38,033 121,997 17,541 24,688 87,177 58,604 86,465 39,616 132,537 80,863 136,995 306,522 47,661 97,395 142,921 130,552 86,760 63,554 86,534 146,318 117,412 85,176 192,224 30,532 52,181 90,695 91,146 30,181 26,151 29,266 102,545 137,851 257,233 66,152 28,517 51,069 26,056 37,144 23,320 41,950 62,128 170,382 43,080 82,449 17,403 172,382 86,371 4,926,126 OSF 6/20/2012 Alternative Fuel Missed Opportunities 13 Actual Add'l Allowance Oper & Maint. per 2012-13 Final Comps 28,321 364,352 98,204 38,880 29,426 65,481 4,553 15,379 87,177 58,604 60,130 39,616 132,537 136,995 306,522 88,946 142,921 130,552 86,655 146,318 85,176 192,224 30,532 47,344 90,695 91,146 30,143 26,151 102,545 137,851 257,233 65,542 28,517 51,069 24,578 37,144 23,320 62,128 43,080 17,403 172,382 85,556 3,763,328 Missed Alternative Fuel Funding 8,659 36,218 24,731 146,204 1,258 663 38,033 117,444 2,162 24,688 26,335 80,863 47,661 8,449 105 63,554 86,534 117,412 4,837 38 29,266 610 1,478 41,950 170,382 82,449 815 1,162,798