Educator Evaluation Summative Evaluation

advertisement
Educator Evaluation
Summative Evaluation
Evaluation System for Teachers
Four
Performance
Levels
Advanced
Progression
6+ years
Intermediate
Progression
4-5 years
Initial
Progression
1-3 years
Oct. 1
Distinguished
Accomplished
Emerging
Summative Conference/Evaluation
by June 14
Al;ksdjf
Unsatisfactory
Adding up the pieces…
A break down of the Elements.
Standard
Rating
Standard 1
Accomplished
Element 1.1
Emerging
Element 1.2
Accomplished
Element 1.3
Accomplished
Element 2.1
Emerging
Accomplished
Element 2.2
Emerging
Element 2.3
Emerging
Standard 2
The intent of providing standard ratings at both the standard and
element level is to help one identify areas of best practice and need!
The
preponderance
of evidence
points to an
overall rating of
accomplished
An Overview of the System
How the Pieces Add Up…
Elements1.1
Elements
Element 1.1
1.1
Standard 1
Elements 2.1
2.1
Elements
Element 2.1
Standard 2
Elements
3.1
Elements
3.1
Element 3.1
Standard 3
Elements4.1
4.1
Element
Standard 4
R/LA School
Growth Score
Math School
Growth Score
Overall
Rating
Standard 7
Elements
5.1
Elements
5.1
Element 5.1
Standard 5
Standard 6
Student
Learning Goal
Student
Learning Goal
Weighting Overview
Element Rating
Standard Rating
First Rating
Element 1.1
Element 1.2
Standard 1 Rating
(average)
Element 1.3
Element 2.1
Element 2.2
Standard 2 Rating
(average)
Element 2.3
Element 3.1
Element 3.2
Standard 3 Rating
(average)
Element 3.3
Element 4.1
Element 4.2
Standard 4 Rating
(average)
Element 5.1
Element 5.2
Element 5.3
Standard 5 Rating
(average)
80% of the Overall Rating
Weighting Overview
Element Rating
Standard Rating
Student Learning Goal 6.1.1
Student Learning Goal 6.1.2
Goal 1 Rating
Goal 2 Rating
OR
Student outcome
Ratings
15% of the Overall Rating
Student Growth on State Summative Assessment
(Educators of Tested Grades & Subjects Only)
Schoolwide Growth for
Math
Student Learning Growth
Rating 1
5% of the Overall Rating
Schoolwide Growth for ELA
Student Learning Growth
Rating 2
Standard Setting Results
• Multiple standards are considered as part of a
larger system
• Cut points:
Rating
Unsatisfactory
Emerging
Cut Score
N/A
30
Accomplished
Distinguished
57.6190476
90.1190476
Weighting Example
Standard
Score
Rating
Weight
Final Rating
Standard 1
2
Accomplished
8/15 pts
42.6 pts
Standard 2
2
Accomplished
Standard 3
1
Emerging
Standard 4
1
Emerging
Standard 5
2
Accomplished
Standard 6.1.1
1
Emerging
2/6 points
5 pts
Standard 6.1.2
1
Schoolwide
Growth in
Math
2
Accomplished
3/6 points
2.5 pts
Schoolwide
Growth in RLA
1
Emerging
50.1
Emerging
Emerging
How to have a good
conference….it is a process, not
an event.
• -keep it positive/constructive, it is not a "gotcha"
meeting
• -communication goes both ways, don't
monopolize the conversation
• -develop trust, be a good listener
• -be detailed with your
recommendations/comments
Work SmarterNot Harder
• Use the tools already available, the data is in
the system.
– Rubric
– Self reflection
– Observations
– Evidence
– Goals
Remember…
• Be honest
• Take responsibility for student learning
• Make sure conversation is focused, specific,
and constructive
• The evaluator has the final say
Final Rating of Standards
Evaluating Student
Learning Goals
Determining Progress…
School Growth
Standard 7
Professional Conduct
Advice from the Field…How will the
evaluation impact your school?
Teachers will realize ownership in their
evaluation.
Gives administrator a great starting point
for collaborative conversations
Holds ALL teachers accountable for ALL
students
It will make you a better instructional
leader
Helpful Hints from the Field
Use your leadership team
Be a cheerleader…Take the lead!
Take full advantage of trainings by the WVDE
and the WVCPD
Questions / Comments /
Concerns
Contact Information:
W. Va. Educator Effectiveness Team WVDE-EducatorEffectiveness@k12.wv.us
Download