Tautological Algebra of Moduli Space of Curves and Representation Theory . Shigeyuki MORITA . based on jw/w Takuya SAKASAI and Masaaki SUZUKI October 27, 2014 Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Contents Contents . . 1 Tautological algebra of moduli space of curves 2 Topological approach to the tautological algebra 3 Degeneration of symplectic invariant tensors 4 Plethysm of GL representations and tautological algebra 5 Prospects . . Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Tautological algebra of moduli space of curves (1) Mg = π0 Diff + Σg : Mapping class group of Σg Tg : Teichmüller space, Mg acts properly discontinuously Mg = Tg /Mg : Riemann moduli space Mg ∼ = π1orb Mg : orbifold fundamental group characteristic classes of surface bundles = cohomology of moduli space H ∗ (BDiff + Σg ; Q) Earle−Eells ∼ = Shigeyuki MORITA H ∗ (Mg ; Q) ∼ = H ∗ (Mg ; Q) Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Tautological algebra of moduli space of curves (2) H 2i (Mg ; Q) 3 ei : MMM tautological class R∗ (Mg ) = subalgebra of H ∗ (Mg ; Q) generated by ei ’s tautological algebra in cohomology of Mg Ai (Mg ) 3 κi : Mumford kappa class R∗ (Mg ) = subalgebra of A∗ (Mg ) generated by κi ’s tautological algebra of Mg canonical surjection R∗ (Mg ) → R∗ (Mg ) Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Tautological algebra of moduli space of curves (3) Conjecture (Faber 1993) . 1 (most difficult part) R∗ (Mg ) ∼ = H ∗ (smooth proj. variety of dim = g − 2; Q)? Gorenstein conjecture, including Poincaré duality 2 R∗ (Mg ) is generated by the first [g/3] MMM-classes with no relations in degrees ≤ [g/3] 3 . explicit formula for the intersection numbers, namely . proportionality in degree g − 2: Rg−2 (Mg ) ∼ = Q (proved by Looijenga and Faber) rt generalizations to the cases of Mg,n , Mct g,n , Mg,n etc. . Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Tautological algebra of moduli space of curves (4) many results due to many people: Faber (verified g ≤ 23), Looijenga, Getzler, Pandharipande Zagier, Vakil, Graber, Lee,... 2010: Pandharipande-Pixton proved Faber-Zagier relations (2): Morita,1998 (cohomology), Ionel, 2003 (Chow algebra) no relation due to Harer (stability theorem), Lee (3): three proofs Givental, 2001, Liu-Xu, Buryak-Shadrin Faber-Pandharipande: some new situation happens for g ≥ 24 Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Topological approach to the tautological algebra (1) HQ = H1 (Σg ; Q) Σg : closed oriented surface, genus g (≥ 1) µ : HQ ⊗ HQ → Q: intersection pairing HQ : fundamental representation of Sp = Sp(2g, Q) Torelli group: Ig = Ker (Mg → Aut (HQ , µ) ∼ = Sp(2g, Q)) Theorem (Johnson) H1 (Ig ; Q) ∼ = ∧3 HQ /HQ (g ≥ 3) UQ := ∧3 HQ /HQ = irrep. [13 ]Sp Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Topological approach to the tautological algebra (2) representation of Mg : ρ1 : Mg → H1 (Ig ; Q) o Sp(2g, Q) (M.) ⇒ Φ : H ∗ (UQ = ∧3 HQ /HQ )Sp → H ∗ (Mg ; Q) Theorem (Kawazumi-M.) Im Φ = R∗ (Mg ) = Q[MMM-classes]/relations tautological algebra in cohomology Madsen-Weiss: H ∗ (M∞ ; Q) = Q[MMM-classes] Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Topological approach to the tautological algebra (3) Furthermore, by analyzing the natural action of Mg on the third nilpotent quotient of π1 Σg , I have constructed the following commutative diagram π1 Σg −−−−→ y ˜ Q [12 ]Sp ×H y ρ̃2 ˜ ∧3 HQ ) o Sp(2g, Q) Mg,∗ −−−−→ (([12 ]torelli ⊕ [22 ]Sp )× Sp p y y ρ2 Mg −−−−→ ˜ Q ) o Sp(2g, Q). ([22 ]Sp ×U Mg,∗ = π0 Diff + (Σg , ∗), [22 ]Sp ⊂ H 2 (UQ ) (Hain) Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Topological approach to the tautological algebra (4) Theorem (Kawazumi-M.) ρ∗2 on H ∗ induces an isomorphism (H ∗ (UQ )/([22 ]Sp ))Sp ∼ = Q[MMM-classes] in a certain stable range. Also ρ̃∗2 induces an isomorphism ⊕ [22 ]Sp ))Sp ∼ (H ∗ (∧3 HQ )/([12 ]torelli = Q[e, MMM-classes] Sp in a certain stable range. Shigeyuki MORITA . Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Degeneration of symplectic invariant tensors (1) (HQ⊗2k )Sp : Sp-invariant subspace of the tensor product HQ⊗2k We analyze the structure of this space completely. Consider µ⊗2k : HQ⊗2k ⊗ HQ⊗2k → Q defined by (u1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ u2k ) ⊗ (v1 ⊗ · · · ⊗ v2k ) 7→ Π2k i=1 µ(ui , vi ) (ui , vi ∈ HQ ). Clearly µ⊗2k is a symmetric bilinear form. Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Degeneration of symplectic invariant tensors (2) Theorem (M.) µ⊗2k on (HQ⊗2k )Sp is positive definite for any g ⇒ it defines a metric on this space Furthermore, ∃ an orthogonal direct sum decomposition ⊕ (HQ⊗2k )Sp ∼ Uλ = |λ|=k, h(λ)≤g λ: Young diagram |λ|: number of boxes, h(λ): number of rows Uλ ∼ = (λδ )S2k as an S2k -module Shigeyuki MORITA . Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Degeneration of symplectic invariant tensors (3) {λ; |λ| = k} bijective ⇔ {µλ ; |λ| = k} eigenvalues Table: Orthogonal decomposition of (HQ⊗8 )Sp λ [14 ] [212 ] [22 ] [31] [4] total µλ (eigen value of Uλ ) (2g − 6)(2g − 4)(2g − 2)2g (2g − 4)(2g − 2)2g(2g + 1) (2g − 2)(2g − 1)2g(2g + 1) (2g − 2)2g(2g + 1)(2g + 2) 2g(2g + 1)(2g + 2)(2g + 3) Shigeyuki MORITA dim Uλ 1 20 14 56 14 105 g g g g g g for Uλ 6= {0} = 4, 5, · · · = 3, 4, 5, · · · = 2, 3, 4, 5, · · · = 2, 3, 4, 5, · · · = 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, · · · Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Degeneration of symplectic invariant tensors (4) (HQ⊗6k )Sp −→ (∧2k UQ )Sp −→ R2k (Mg ) onto onto [6k]0 7−→ 0 (g ≤ 3k − 1) (enough to prove Faber conj. (2)) [6k − 2, 2]0 7−→ 0 (g ≤ 3k − 2) [6k − 4, 4]0 [6k − 4, 22 ]0 7−→ 0 (g ≤ 3k − 3) [6k − 6, 6]0 [6k − 6, 42]0 [6k − 6, 23 ]0 7−→ 0 0 0 (g ≤ 3k − 4) 4 0 [6k − 8, 8] [6k − 8, 62] · · · [6k − 8, 2 ] 7−→ 0 (g ≤ 3k − 5) In this way, we obtain many (hopefully all? the) relations in R∗ (Mg ) as well as in R∗ (Mg,∗ ) Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Degeneration of symplectic invariant tensors (5) Conjecture (M.) . 1 R∗ (Mg ) ∼ = (∧∗ UQ /([22 ]Sp ))Sp ( )⊥ ∼ = ([22 ]Sp )Sp in (∧∗ UQ )Sp 2 . ( )Sp 2 R∗ (Mg,∗ ) ∼ ⊕ [2 ] ) = ∧∗ (∧3 HQ )/([12 ]torelli Sp Sp ( )⊥ ( )Sp 2 torelli 2 Sp ∼ ([1 ] ⊕ [2 ] ) in ∧∗ (∧3 HQ ) = Sp Sp . Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Plethysm of GL representations and tautological algebra (1) Plethysm: composition of two Schur functors determination of plethysm: very important but extremely difficult Theorem (Formula of Littlewood) Complete description of the following plethysms S ∗ (S 2 HQ ), ∧∗ (S 2 HQ ), S ∗ (∧2 HQ ), ∧∗ (∧2 HQ ) . Theorem (Manivel) Plethysm S k (S l HQ ) “super stabilizes” as k → ∞, in particular super stable decomposition of S ∞ (S 3 HQ ) is given by S ∗ (S 2 HQ ⊕ S 3 HQ ) Shigeyuki MORITA . Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Plethysm of GL representations and tautological algebra (2) Theorem (Sakasai-Suzuki-M.) Let ∧k (∧3 HQ ) = ⊕ mλ λGL λ,|λ|=3k be the stable irreducible decomposition as a GL-module. Then, for any k, the mapping ∧k (∧3 HQ ) −→ ∧k+1 (∧3 HQ ) induced by the operation λ 7→ λ+ = [λ13 ] is injective and surjective for the part λ+ GL with 2k + 1 ≤ h(λ) ≤ 3k. In other words, we have the inequality { ≤ m λ+ . mλ = mλ+ (2k + 1 ≤ h(λ) ≤ 3k) Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Plethysm of GL representations and tautological algebra (3) Theorem (Sakasai-Suzuki-M.) . We have determined the super stable irreducible decomposition of ∧∞ [13 ]GL up to codimension 30 . . Table: Super stable irreducible decomposition of ∧∞ [13 ]GL cod. 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 irreducible decomposition [1∗ ] [21∗ ] [22 1∗ ] [23 1∗ ] [24 1∗ ][32 1∗ ] [25 1∗ ][323 1∗ ][32 21∗ ] 2[26 1∗ ]2[32 22 1∗ ][42 1∗ ] [27 1∗ ][325 1∗ ]2[32 23 1∗ ][33 21∗ ][4322 1∗ ][42 21∗ ] Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Plethysm of GL representations and tautological algebra (4) Corollary (Sakasai-Suzuki-M.) . We have determined super stable Sp-invariant part ( ∞ 3 )Sp ∧ [1 ]GL up to codimension 30 . . Table: Super stable irred. summands of ∧∞ [13 ]GL with double floors cod. 0 2 4 6 8 10 irreducible decomposition [1∗ ] [22 1∗ ] [24 1∗ ][32 1∗ ] 2[26 1∗ ]2[32 22 1∗ ][42 1∗ ] 2[28 1∗ ]3[32 24 1∗ ]2[34 1∗ ]2[42 22 1∗ ][52 1∗ ] 2[210 1∗ ]4[32 26 1∗ ]4[34 22 1∗ ]4[42 24 1∗ ]3[42 32 1∗ ]2[52 22 1∗ ][62 1∗ ] Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Plethysm of GL representations and tautological algebra (5) R∗ (Mg ) → R∗ (Mg ) → G∗ (Mg ) (Gorenstein quotient) R∗ (Mg,1 ) → R∗ (Mg,∗ ) → G∗ (Mg,1 ) (Gorenstein quotient) Expectation (Faber, Zagier, Bergvall, Yin) The number p(k) − dim G2k (Mg ) depends only on ` = 3k − 1 − g in the range 2k ≤ g − 2 (i.e. k ≥ ` + 3). Similarly the number 1 + p(1) + · · · + p(k) − dim G2k (Mg,1 ) depends only on ` = 3k − 1 − g in the range 2k ≤ g − 1 (i.e. k ≥ ` + 2). . Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Plethysm of GL representations and tautological algebra (6) We have the following two theorems which may serve as supporting evidences for the above expectation Theorem (Sakasai-Suzuki-M.) The number ( )Sp ( ) hgi Sp − dim ∧2k UQ dim ∧2k UQ depends only on ` = 3k − 1 − g in the range hgi 2k ≤ g − 2 (i.e. k ≥ ` + 3), where UQ denotes UQ for the specific genus g while we assume that the genus of UQ is in the stable range, namely it is sufficiently large. . Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Plethysm of GL representations and tautological algebra (7) Theorem (Sakasai-Suzuki-M.) The number ( )Sp ( ) hgi Sp dim ∧2k (∧3 HQ ) − dim ∧2k (∧3 HQ ) depends only on ` = 3k − 1 − g in the range hgi 2k ≤ g − 1 (i.e. k ≥ ` + 2), where HQ denotes HQ for the specific genus g while we assume that the genus of HQ. is in the stable range, namely it is sufficiently large. Similar statements should also hold modulo the corresponding ideals Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Plethysm of GL representations and tautological algebra (8) Furthermore, we have the following more precise result. ( ) ( )Sp hgi Sp orthogonal complement of ∧2k (∧3 HQ ) in ∧2k (∧3 HQ ) ⇒ tautological relations in R2k (Mg,∗ ) ) ( )Sp ( hgi Sp orthogonal complement of ∧2k UQ in ∧2k UQ ⇒ tautological relations in R2k (Mg ) Theorem (Sakasai-Suzuki-M.) If we fix ` = 3k − 1 − g, then all the above orthogonal complements are canonically isomorphic to each other in the range 2k ≤ g − 1 (i.e. k ≥ ` + 2) or 2k ≤ g − 2 (i.e. k ≥ ` + 3). Similar statements should hold modulo corresponding ideals Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Prospects (1) (I) Construction of the “fundamental cycles” : ( ) hgi Sp µg,∗ ∈ ∧2g−2 (∧3 HQ ) ( ) hgi Sp µg ∈ ∧2g−4 UQ and topological proof of the intersection number formula (II) Investigation of the relation between our tautological relations with those of Faber-Zagier as well as those of Yin Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory Prospects (2) (III) Which part is isomorphic or non-isomorphic ?: R∗ (Mg ) → R∗ (Mg ) → G∗ (Mg ) (Gorenstein quotient) R∗ (Mg,1 ) → R∗ (Mg,∗ ) → G∗ (Mg,1 ) (Gorenstein quotient) Shigeyuki MORITA Tautological Algebra and Representation Theory