M i n e s a n dM i n e r a lR e s o u r c e s
N e w M e x i c oB u r e a uo f
Open F i l e R e p o r t No. OF-202
PETROLEUM SOURCE-ROCK
STUDY
OF
SELECTED
WELLS
I N THE R I O GRANDE RIFT A R E A ,
by A l a n H.
L e u t l o f f a n dD a v i d
Conoco, I n c .
G o l d e nC
, olorado
D e c e m b e r1 4 ,
1982
NEW MEXICO
J.
Curry
Wells s e l e c t e d :
1.) Conoco No. 3 S t . L o u i s R o c k yM o u n t a i n( C o l f a xC o u n t y )
No. 1 S a n t aF e( S a n d o v a C
l ounty)
2 . )S h e l l
3.)
S h e l l No. 1 L a g u n aW i l s o n( B e r n a l i l l oC o u n t y )
4.)
Sun No. 1 V i c t o r i oL a n da n d
C a t t l e Co. ( S i e r r aC o u n t y )
5.)
S u n r a yM i d - C o n t i n e n t
No. 1 F e d e r a l M ( S i e r r a Counnfy)
6.)
C i t i e s S e r v i c e No. 1 C o r r a l i t o sF e d e r a l
A ( D o n a Ana
county)
7.)
S i n c l a i r No. 1 Doza Ana F e d e r a l 18 (DoGa Ana C o u n t y )
Conoco Inc.
13949 West Colfax h e . . Suite
P.O. BOX 1219
Denver west ~xpioratlon
loo
Golden, CO 80402
(303)
232-0727
December 14, 1982
Sam Thompson
New Mexico Bureau of Mines
New Mexico Tech.
87801
Socorro, New Mexico
Dear
and
Mineral
Resources
Sam,
I am enclosing a copy of the report
on our source bed study
from selected wells in the Rio Grande Rift. Thank you for
allowing us to collect samples from your log library.
I
hope this report
is beneficial toyou and your endeavors.
Sincerely,
Alan
Leutloff
AHL/mn
cc:
W. E. Zabriskie
M. L. Johnson
Robert Bieberman
SUMMARY
&+b; n 3 3
Core samples,from
seven wells in the Rio Grande Rift system of
New Mexico were evaluated for source potential. The Sinclair
No. 1 Dona Ana was very in
low organic carbon content and not
analyzed further. The other six wells ranged from poor to
good in potential richness. Maturity levels varied from
moderately mature in some Cretaceous sections to overmature
in some Pennsylvanian and older sediments. The Conoco
No. 3
St. Louis Rocky Mountain and Shell Santa
Fe No. 1 both
showed source potential (in terms of maturity and richness)
in the Cretaceous and possibly
in the Triassic sections.
The presence of lignite made
it difficult to evaluate the
richness of the Cretaceous age sections in the Shell Laguna
Wilson No. 1, Sun Victoria No. 1, and Sunray Midcontinent No.
1, but maturities were within the oil generation phase. In
these last four wells the older sections are probably poor
sources due to overmaturity, lack of organic carbon, or both.
The CitiesNo. 1 Corralitos had only one interval of fair
richness; this interval
was very mature.
INTRODUCTION
The organic geochemistry of core samples from seven in
wells
the Rio Grande Rift system
was analyzed to evaluate the source
potential of Mesozoic and Paleozoic
5omtions in this area.
The wells analyzed are locatedorinadjacent to the basins
which form a part of the Rio Grande
Rift. These basins are
generally oriented with north-to-south long axes and are
roughly parallel to the course
of the Rio Grande River from
southern Colorado to west Texas. The basins show evidence of
complex faulting and uplift
in places. Well locations are
1.
shown in Figure
SAMPLE AND
ANALYTICAL
DESCRIPTION
y
Conoco North American Exploration from
of the New Mexico Bureau of Mines
of 114
he sample
he stored coFes. antities of
sui5:tAgroisted
h
The size and nature
of the samples limited the organic geochemical techniqueswhich could be used. No light hydrocarbon
and the small sample size precluded
data were possible,
solvent extraction and the isolation of kerogen for pyrolysis.
The samples were analyzed for total organic carbon (TOC)
content, kerogen type and visual maturity estimation, some
vitrinite reflectance data (again limited by sample size),
and whole rock pyrolysis. Pyrolysis showed many of the samples
to have been contaminated, possibly during storage, since
some of the contaminants are very similar from well to well.
In addition, some samples, especialiy from the Cretaceous
fomtions,. contained appreciable amounts
of coal, which
interfered with evaluation of source richness.
Page 2
INDIVIDUAL
1.
WELL
EVALUATIONS
Conoco No. 3 St. Louis Rocky Mountain (Colfax County)
The three Cretaceous age samples
(1,550, 3,400, and 4,360
feet) in this well are
of fair-to-good richness and are
mature to very mature. Kerogen is chiefly woody and
herbaceous; this and the pyrolysis results indicate that
the expected production
type is gasand oil. These samples
have large amounts of
P I pyrolyzates (thermally extractable material), which resemble
an oil which has lost its
2).
light ends rather than a refined product (see Figure
It cannot be determined if this is
a native (i.e., in situ
generated) or migrated bitumen. The Triassic age sample
(5,330 feet) is fair in richness (TOC) and probably gasprone. Maturity (based only on pyrolysis data) appears to
be high.
2.
Shell No. 1 Santa Fe (Albuquerque Basin, Sandoval County)
This well appears to have the best potential. The Cretaceous
in richage samples (4,000 to 6,800 feet) are fair to good
ness (two contain lignite) and are moderately mature to
mature (i.e., within the oil generation
stage). Kerogen
type is principally amorphous, and pyrolysis data indicate
these samples to be oil or oil- and gas-prone. The Jurassic
7,050 feet is fair in richness and mature.
age sample at
The intervals from
7,400 to 10,500 feet are all low in organic
carbon and of poor potential (most samples contain less than
0.3 percent organic carbon). The Pennsylvanian age sample
at 10,700 feet has a fair potential according to TOC content.
However, a large proportion of the kerogen is coaly, which
is likely to be inert
(i-e., dead carbon). Pyrolysis also
shows little active carbon left in the sample, implying
that the kerogen has already generated its hydrocarbons,
and so the presence of gas or in
oilthese sediments is
dependent on geologic factors.
3.
Shell No. 1 Laguna Wilson (Albuquerque Basin, Bernalillo
County)
(2,640 to 3,850 feet) all contain
The Cretaceous age samples
lignite, which makes it impossible to assess richness by
TOC and restricts pyrolysis data. Limited optical kerogen
data show the
3,420-foot sample to be moderately mature
and contain chiefly amorphous kerogen. The same Cretaceous
formations in other wells (e.g., the Shell Santa
Fe No. l),
generally show fair-to-good richness and moderate maturity;
it is uncertain, however, if these data can be extrapolated
to this well. Similarly, the Jurassic sample at
3,950 feet
is lignite-contaminated, but the same formation (Morrison)
in the nearby Shell Santa
Fe No. 1 is fair in potential.
From 4,560 to 8,400 feet, the richness is generally very
poor. From 8,450 feet to thebottom, the richness is poor
from 9,750 feet to the bottom).
to generally fair (especially
Page 3
Maturity data are somewhat contradictory, but the kerogen
is probably extremely mature (condensate- and wet-gas-prone)
at the top of this interval and overmature and dry-gasprone at the bottom (as indicated by pyrolysis). The
samples at 9,750 feet and below all contain significant
amount of coaly kerogen, and pyrolysis indicates very
little generating capacity. In addition, these samples
all showed contamination by what appears to be a distillate.
The presence of a significant proportion of inert carbon
in the kerogen and the presence of contamination imply
that the source potential of these samples may be less than
that indicated by the TOC values. As with the adjacent
Santa Fe No. 1, the kerogen in the bottom of this well
has probably been buried more deeply at
than
present and
has already generated its hydrocarbons; hence the preservation of any gas depends on structural and tectonic factors.
4.
Sun Victoria No. 1 (Jornada del Muerto Basin, Sierra County)
This well shows evidence of uplift and erosion, since the
Cretaceous age samples at less than a 1,000-foot depth are
very mature to extremely mature (condensate to wet gas
generation stage). Kerogen type is chiefly amorphous and
coaly, and production type (from pyrolysis data) is wet
gas and condensate. These samples also appear to be
contaminated by a remnant bitumen (either native or migrated). The Triassic, Permian, and Pennsylvanian age samples
from 1,140 to 5,300 feet are all of poor source potential
(low TOC values). The samples from 5,600
to 5,970 feet
are poor to generally fair in richness. However, these
( . u 2 percent
samples are all at very high levels of maturity
vitrinite reflectance) and show very little generating
capability, being at the phase-out of dry gas generation.
As with the other wells,
the presence of gas will depend
on lithology and trapping.
5.
Sunray Midcontient No. 1 (Sierra County)
The Cretaceous and the Permian San Andres (3,690 feet)
and Glorietta (4,040 feet) samples are poor to fair
in
richness (two are lignite-contaminated) and are mature to
very mature (late stage generation). The kerogen type
in these samples is woody and herbaceous in the 2,280-foot
sample and generally amorphousin the other samples. The
samples at 7,030 and 7,070 feet (Pennsylvanian) are of fair
richness (by TOC content) but .are overmature (vitrinite
reflectance of 2.73 percent) and, as in the
previously
discussed wells, past the generation stage. The other
samples in this well are poor in richness and overmature.
Page 4
6. Cities No. 1 Corralitos (Dona Ana County)
This well contains only Permian and older strata and is,
in general, low in organic carbon. The samples at 2,120
and 2,740 feet are of poor potential, very mature to
extremely mature, and probably wet-gas-prone. The 2,630foot (Pennsylvanian) interval isof fair richness, possibly
oil- and gas-prone, and extremely mature (condensate to
wet gas stage).
7.
Sinclair No. 1 Dona Ana (Dona Ana County)
This well contains only Permian and older strata, and no
potential source rocks were found in any of the sampled
intervals (TOC never exceeded 0.29 percent).
I
'I
i
!
I
I
I
I
. w
vu
= a
QZ
6$
e
>
f'
#
:5
0 0
C m
.-
oa
0
0 2
^t
c
"
0
0
0,
b
r
0
*
o
b
0
b
P
0
0
0
*
0
0
0
o
0
Lo
c
N
0
0
0
55
0
ID
0
0
mu)
o n
0
0
0
u)
1 1
P
u)
bb b
o r
mo
u)t. .r
0
! I ,
0
0
0
m
0
.r
I
b
N
m
m
0 '
0
0
01
II
9
0
0
bbb
.
C
09-
"
0
0
~X
1.
-
. . ... . ..,
r
0.
9.
OJ
0
0
9.
*0
0
?-I
I
0
0
*?
0
d '
0
N
(...
d
.. . .,r. .
..
0 .
0
d
d
0
m
d
._-...
,LO1+ 'lzlH l d 3 a
d
0
d
0
m
0
0
0
m
0
0
m
tOLt
O
l
z
l
-
0
3
0
._
.
d
0
ID
d
m
0
,
t . . , * r......
. .
.
0
0
0
ID
ID
0
0
0
Hld3a
d
'UH l d 3 a
'
LO11 'UH l d 3 a
N
0
9*,
x"---
0
?.
0
0
N
0
0
. N
rOl*
.
d
0
d
0
(D
-
t-
d
0
(D
.-
It. .It
d
0
*
-
m
d
* .
d
m
t.
N
d
ID
ID
0
*
,
.
..
.i
..
:.
..
I
~
.
. ....: ?
..
:XI
C
L
.
rOL.
'UH l d X l
I
...
.* .
0
0
8
U
%/
-
0
c
_
. .
c
N
d
1011 'U Hld3a
__c_c_c_
0
u)
c
'UHld3a
m
101.
0
U
m
.
.
I
(.
"
".
... ...... _. .. - . _ ....
0
P
u)
..
SunrayMidcontinent'No. 1
INTERVAL
ORGC
0.00
2.00
MATURATION INDEX
4,
1
4.
,. 2 ,-3
1.
I.
4.
4 6
20.4
40.
40.-
40
4c
60.-
60,
60
80.-
80,
.80
.
..
.
VISUAL KEROGEN
3.00 40.00 80.00
20
20
..:.
Sierra Co., NM
2c
1
5
60.
%-
t
r
c
n
W
L3
80.
!, :i
,... . .
100.
100.-
100.
100
,
..
I
0
= Permian
= Pennsylvanian
3 .
"
'
/
'
..
:
_ .
E
.
2
d
0
v)
I
b)
..-
C
0
!
Denver West Explwatlan
Conoco Inc.
13949 West Colfax h e . . Suite 100
P.O. BOX1219
Golden, CO 80402
(303) 232-0727
October 2 51, 9 8 2
Sam Thompson
New Mexico Bureau
of Mines
and Mineral Resources
New Mexico Tech.
Socorro, NM 8 7 8 0 1
Dear Mr. Thompson,
Enclosed are theraw data results of the geochemical analysis
NM. I have been informed
from wells in the Rio Grande Rift,
by our researcher in Ponca City, that a formal report should
be presented to me sometime
in late December. Thank you so
much for allowingus to collect these well samples.
If I can beof any further help to
you, now or
future, please feel free to contact me.
Sincerely,
Y
Alan Leutloff
Geologist
Pdr
cc:
W. E. Zabriskie
M. L. Johnson
R. A. Bieberman
any
time
in
the
...
-. . . . . . . . .
. D A T A SKEET
CONOCO ST.
_"
DEPTH
FT
SAMPLE
NUMBER
.~7..";-i-p.-.""1.tjoo
1287
1287
---E"?i
91
91
2
3
4
,
-
.
.
-"_
....
.
P
5 0 ."
.......
"
-"
.
0.00
0.
0.
...
O*"O
0 .oo
0.
.
,-
, I
..- .
....."_..."__.~._..."-..._..-..I
...".
_, _"_..I
HC
PPM,
"-0
"
"
0.
0.
. . . . . . . . 0 ........
HC/OC
SAT
9
4.
_"
o"O*
0.00
.
0.00
..o"oo".
..
....................
........
.
..
"
.-
.
.._.I
TE
EPPC
%
PPM
- 0 .".I."@."Lo."-I
OROC
1.42
3370
4330
1.95
5.31.0... - 6 2
NM
.-. .....-
.......
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.
CO.',
__COLFPX
...... _.........
LOUIS R O C K Y M T N
..............
.
__
._
(y..@o"---0.00
0.00
.
O...OO"*
.........
-............
"
"
ARO
P.
RASP
'HC/TE
%
0"_.....
9i
~"@o"-ol)(f;"-o-o
0.00
0.00
0.00' ,: :o.oo
:,
'
.
"
0.00
0.00
o.;o~"-~oo-".o~~~
..-
_"
....
"
,..~
,
..
--- .-
I
".
....
..;
. .
.
......
*5*.-"tf.yDRO~
-
"
"
"
F2.87"-88".4
1287
8R 5
"
1287
88
0
1287
88
1287 ..E8
8
9
---";26"---88---7-.
DEPTH
FT
40 10
4370
4520
6500.
6700
6790
. - ' 7 0 1 ti
.87
10.10
9.90
1.39
1.2U
7440
8920
ti7
.10
'
:>
88 1 1
931 0
9370
8 8 12
.
lr.
1 7 - 7 - 8 8+3-"---.9-7-1~0
:
10290
:..
1 2 8 7 , 88 ,14
. ..
. '... :;::j2f37,;.: 8.8. >15
10440
:,
, . ,,, ,
.'.,
I.
,I?,
ib
I P W " ~ %
"o"-"*
o9
I
I
L
...
0.0.
0.
0.
0
(J
..
9.
.11
.12
10
-32
.221
...
. .
0*UO
0.00
. ..(I,
0.
0.00
O'U0
0.uo
0.00
0.00
0.00
.o.(,o
0.
0.
0.00
0.
0.00
O.r"---O"+.*".--"
. . . . . -, -
~
. . . . .........
.
"
."..........
.........
. . . .
...
4
0.00
0.00
"OiOO.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0-00
0.
0.
0.
0.
0
0.
0.00
0.
0.00
.o..
0.
0.
0.
-......
__ .- .." ......
-
..-
P R O HC/TERASP
%
9
0 , O O . - ..... 0.0.0 .........
%
0 00 .......
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
. o . .0 0 .. ."O, 0 0
O.*.OO
- 0 .oo. .....
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00 . . . 0.00
0.00
0.00 -........
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0"OO
(y..O@---"f)<
0~-0.--000.00
0.00
n 0.0
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
..o..,-,o~
~-.~~-"-.&rO@-"O-.~~----.
0.00
0.00 .
0.00 , , . 0.00
....
...
..
-
..
.
..
. 0 .oo ..
0.00
0.00
t .#o"
.
.....
. . . .
o.no
0.
0.UO
'
0.
0.
-.
PC
SAT hC/CC
PPV
9
0.
0.00
ur
0.
o*Uo
0.
0.00
......... 0 ....... O'O@
."
. -. ..... .- .................
"
EPOC
ti.
'
-
..............
P ?'I
1.08
.40
.
NM
TF
OWGC
.
1287
1287
.
. . . . . . . . . . .
S P N D A U A L C0.r
.
..
._
..........
SAMPLE
NUMRER
#8-/"88
-1"1287
88
2
1207
88
3
PRBON. DATP"-SI!EET...
.-
FE-1
S H E LSLP k T A
"&*~"91.40".
._.
...
0.00
, I
0.00.:':.
Or00"--ds0.0
-
_.-.
. . . . . . . . .
o.oo..i:~i:i::~o.oo
,OB . . . - . ,OJ-"f
'U
. ,
.........
"
"_
.I
.-
.
..............
"
.
.
-.
.__
.
...........
-.
Cis+
..
-.
....
. . . . ". .... - ..
. . . . . .
".
-. ._..... - -. . . .
hYDROCPQHOR O A T P SHEET
. . . . . -.
............
. . . . . . .
...
."
...... -.-
.- . - ..- ..._
"
"
"
- ".
~
DEPTH SAkPLE
"eEg-."-.
1287
i287
85
85
23
22
--"2i3"Ys2.4"-".8
1287
1287
85. 25
8 5 26
"--fiL8.F"65
-2-7"
1287
28
85
1287 85 29
~ f f F - - . B f - 3 ------l.0630
0
1287
85
31
10870
.
n.
94
0.
T
...
.....
6.
0.
0
0.
0.
.
0.u0
0.60
. 0 ..u 0
0.00
n.
......
...
A R O H C / TREA S P
..
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
.. 0.00.
0.00
. . .
9.
o.no
.
o...no
0. 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
n.oo
0.00
0.00
.
n. no
..o n o
0.00
g" . .." . . . . . . . . . . .
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.0.0
0.00
p..oo
0"00""~".00"~.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
... 0 0 0 . . . . . ..@. 0 0."
.
0 -.oo
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0 00
. o--oo
0-00
0.00
0.00
0.00
-
.... ".
c$
.
-
...........
-
.. E
..(I
.
-6 1
.60
_"
.
S A Th C / C C
PPN
(t
0
0 . 0.
0.
0.
.49
10510
kC
0."0
0.
0.
0.00
0.
0.00
0.00 0. 0.00 0.00
0 ._ . . . . .o
0 . . . -. .O.". ...... -..o.-oo
.3h
.40
.63
9450
975 0
9P.50
EPOC
PPM
8670 .21
8e70
.e4
95 0
'.36
9060
-.
TF
O2FC
5
FT
...
...
.......
.......
e
..__I
.........
.- .....
..................
. .. .
. . .
. .
.
, ,
..
-- .
"
..
,e
-
...........
-. . . . .-. ............
-. ......
SUN OIL CO.
1-VICTORIA
........ -..
SAMPLE
NUMBER
",7~~"8
1287
1287
~
~
1287
,1287
...
~.
2
3
~
5
86
86
~
. .
DEPTY
FT
"E80
910
1140
" 00 "
1500
86
86
6
1750
1
T
B
b
7""I 9 10
12A7 8 6 8
2020
1287 8 6 9
2530
'
-
"
~
r
1287
1287
-
- - 3
8 6 11
8 6 12
reo
S ~ E R R AC O . ?
NM
EPUC
1E
PPM
OIlGC
v
.e1
%
0.
n.
.53
.OR
.
- . 21
h
3
?h
.34
.15
o*un
0
0;'oo
0.
0.
.1H
n.
.33
0.
.OR
3350
.07
0.
0.
3690
.lo
n.
..13na
.
0.
0
0.
.lh
.14
.SA
n.
n.
5600
1287 8 6 17
1281 8 6 18
5650
54
1
2
t
1
7
"5"
7 -7 0 .2h
.Bb
i281 86 2 0
5870
1287 8 6 - 21
5
9
5
0
.72
.. -
0'00
0.00
0.
.
n.
!I
.
0.
n.
0.
....
........
0.bO
'0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
HC/OC
PFM
4
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.
0.
0.
-.
0.
_- .. 0
0.
0.
.....
.
..n.o
'o'
0.00
0.00
0.00'
0.
0.00
0.
0.00
'0.00
0. (IO
0*00
0.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0'. 0 0
0*00
0.00
0.00
0.C0
0.00
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0;
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.
0.00
0.00
0 .oo
0.00
' 0 o; 0
0.00
0.00
'0.00'
0.00
0.00
. . . . . .
_.. . . . .
SPT
--
"
.
...
.- .-
o..oo.-.
..
PRO H C / TREA S P
v
9r
0.00
0.00
R
0;oo
0.00
0.00
0.00 0.00
0.00
o o ....
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
n.no
o;no
n.no
. o;oo'.
0.00
0.00
n.no
n. n o
0.00
0.00
0.00
".oo...
n.no
n.no
0.00
n. o o
o.no
........
n,nn,:.
.-
0.00
o.nn
n*nn
n.oo
n.no
....
..
"
oo
..
."
.
.
o"(To
"
"
a-oo
.
-"o-oo
- .o,oo
n.no
o.no
n.nn
n. no
0.00
g.
0.00 .
n. 0 0
0.00
0.00
.
-
. .
"
n.00
"
,
0.00
"
"
0
0.00
(1.00
-.......
..
0.00
0.00
...-o-;ao
0.00
0.00
- n.;.oo".-~~"o.o
- ..-
.
.
0.00
'0.00
o xo0.00
0.00
o..oo
0.00
0.00
6;oo
0.00
0.00
n.;
*
0.00
n.00
__
. 0.00
0.00
...
o,o
0.00
0.00
=
~~
"
"
."
_"
.
." ". .
..
"_
.........
-
-
........
=
PERCENT
ORGANIC
CARRON
PPEA OF EXTRACT I N R O C K
...........................................
?. 1 R A T T ' A S . A PERCENT OF O R G A N I C C A R P O N LIJVL
HC
PPM
= PPP OF PYOHOCAHHONS I N R O C K f l y !LC
HC/OC % = HYDROCPRSONS AS A PERCENT O F O R G A N T C CARHON
.....
.........
-="PERCENT
SPTURATFS I N E X T R A C T t i Y ! L C
ARO %
PEHCEKT
AROMATICS
I N EXTRACT B Y T L C
RASP .% = P E F C E N R
T ESINS
AND ASPHALTEKES I N FXTRACT
@ Y TLC
-n"~y~ROCflRRoh$s.
A S A PFHCENT. o r .EXTRACT B Y . .TLc... ...............
ORGC 'x
T E PPM
.....
....... ._ ......... ._-._
- ..
................
tic
"
"
"
-......
...................
.,
.
.
"
.........
.
.........
.
C15+ hYDHOCPRRON
DATA
SHEET
...
"
~ttmRb"-M-ft3CON-7..Ih'ENT-1
S I E R R A CO.*
.....
NM
DEPTH SAMPLE
--"--NQMB*
..........
OHGC
EPbC
HC
hC/OC
SAT
TE
PRO HC/T
REA S P
-g
. 9:
9 - .
PPM
. . . 5?
..FT
PPM
e
%
i287 . 87 1
2280
0'00
0.
+41
0.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
128787
2
2330
2.07
0.UO
0.
0.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
24.30
0.00
0.
0.00
n.00 .
0 00 . --~-..oo
o.oo . . . . .
1
c
t
(
l
"
.44
0.
1207 8 7 6
2P50
0. b @
.33
0.
0.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
128787
5
0'00
0.
0.00
3410
.7R
n.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
. . . .
.o ..... o-..oo ....... 0..
- .... o " o o
0.
.33
"6":3690.
o"Oo
o"oo
0-00 .
0.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
4040
1287 8 ? 7
1.76
0.
0.00
1287 87 8
4790
n.
0.
0.00
n.oo
.14
0.00
0.00
0.00
o.un
"
V
.--551
B
0
c
I
n. "
.
0.
.o.oo
0. 00
o--.oo -.-o-.oo---o.-oo..
. 0 7I
0.00
0.
0.00
0.00
0.00
1287 87 10
6760
0.
.31
0.00
0.00
1287 8 7 1 1
0.00
0.
0.00
0.00
n.no
0.00
0
.
7030
.44
0.00
. . . . . o 00
0
co I.
--f2"-:7Q
5 0.
0
osbo"---1)~-oo"-"oso+oToo-~oo---""-0900
0.
'0.00
.09
'.'
f287:
13
8710
0.
0.00
0.00 :. :.o.Oo:"~;.:.': 0.00
0.
0.00
0.
0.00
0.00
0.00. .;, 0:oo
.O.OO'
.(Jo _"...
0
Q"oo'
90-...n-o""oo+osao
0. .
@()"l.""
n.
0.00
0.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
"..
"'
.
.
..
~
i;
.
.
.
"
"
"
.
.
"
-.
'
0.
-
-
- . "-
.
,
. . .
.
. . .
.....
- ..............
"
"
"
"
. . . ._
..
".
.
..
............
"
..
- ......
..
..........................
"
C 1 5 + HYDHOCPRROh
DATA
SHEET
..
.....
"
"
'
..:
. . .
CTTTt5
. ..
,
-
.RFfix.TOS
I F 0
1
'
.
, 1 2 8 79
89 1287
7 .49
8
,
89 1 0
89 11
.
..
. . .1287;
'
.
T
"
89. 13
.i . 1287
..
:i.
: :
5070
4750
89"14
=
ORGC %
T E PPM
2630
3SAO
0:
0..;
........
...
,"
o.,.()u
-o;".L+
0.
.....
.
0.
o;
.
0 00 , .
0.00
i.o.00
: " . . 0.00
o~~~
*lo.o
0.
., 0.
!
oT".-F;oF
"
"
0.bO
0'00.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
o".o
.
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
.
Y
0.
'0.bO
0.00
0.
0.
0.00
0.00
"
"
0
".-
..
o-o%--"-.
f
y
"
"
"
0.00
. 0.00
.
o-.oo""
0.00
"
"
0.00
o-oo"7
.
0.00
-o"oo"
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
.........
.
;
__.
...
CARROh
~ ~ O C A ~ B ' D N S . ' - A S - ' A . - P E R C E N T --' O~F
"
0.
0.00"
0.00
, i
0.00
"oD
Io
o;-oo'
0.00
"_
.I
-
-
0.00
"0
0.00
0..
I . . .
OIDO
0.00
o;-oo
.o.oo
0.00
o,oo
oo
'OF-ORGANI.~FCARFON"""
'HC P P k = PPI' OF HYDROCARBONS Ih' ROCK B Y !LC
HC/OC B = HYDROCARBONS
AS
A PERCENT O F OR!"ANIC
CPRBON
*~EAT~.TURpTE'S"TN'EXTRACT
.AYTL.C
5AT %
A R O % = PERCENT
PROMPTICS
I N EXTRACT H Y ! L C
RASP 3
' = PERCENT
GESINS
AND ASPHALTENES I N EXTRACT
BY
TLC
iiL/.It
'
0.
0.
.
.
HCITE'.
(J;-o.Cr7L"~-~r--csl;o
0.00.
0.00
t X l W c n C T .-AS-A"PERCENT
--
0.00
,
0.00
0.00
.
.
~
0.00
0.00
0.
0.
o.;
,
,
.o o u , o o
"
"
~
= ' P P M OF EXTRPCT I N ROCK
-
POC
.:... . . . '!. .;
. __
.
_
I
I
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
"
g L_
.. , .
; O . O O . i .8 ' .......
, . i j ~ o ~ : : ~ ~, ..,.,
i , .~. . . o ~::d o : ; , ' .
'
0.00
:'r:
110..00.
:.,~.;.o.Oo;..,.
.
0.-
,I.;
,..
..
,
..... .!.
i
'/
RASP
':
0.
0.00
PRO
SPT
PC/OC
. 0.
0.00
0.
0.UO
0 ;-- o"00"7""0.
.o*uo
0.00
0.
o * . . ....o-oo" .
.07
0.
.16
". ...............0.
PERCENT
ORGANIC
HC
PPM
,
:..
. .
.:
..
...
"
_
I
0.00
.20
4150
e25
~3 o,o- ........ ,12
1
..
. . . .f L 8 I . ' 8 9
":.
o
.
.08
37-00''. '.07
4010
.11
"
"
..
. . . . .~,
TE
PP,~
4
a5
1287
1287
ORGC
EPOC
%
2120 0 .
.34
56"---i)47 2 1 8 0 ............24 ...
89
..1cr6r.:
...
1700
.09
l1'820
i80
"----I1287
' 1 2-8897
DOF!A..'ANNA "co.~.,.-N1.:
pT
89 . ' 2
~.>.
... , ;', .. . .>..
. .
,:'::'.:.,i
~
DEPTH
SAHPLE
ER-
..
__
.
,
..: .
:
-
~
~
..........
. . . . . . . .- . . . .
~
~
~
._
~
~
~
............
._....... - .....
0
-
f
"
-
...... ........
"
~
f
"
"_
.
-
"
~
, ,
~
-
-
'
"
....
"
.- . " ..~ !:. .. .:,
'
-..
"
.~ .
",
"
.-
..
"
~
..
................
.....
.
"_
"
"
,
.....
....-
._
~
-
~~
RASP % . = PERCENT RESINS
.UrltF
=
AND
ASPHALTENES
N
I
EXTRACT BY TLC
HVnROCAREONS AS A PERCENT OF EXTRACT BY TLC
c
...
I