DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2011
BUDGET ESTIMATE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
PROGRAM
SUBMITTED TO CONGRESS
FEBRUARY 2010
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION FY 2011 PROGRAM
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TAB DESCRIPTION
--- -----------
PAGE NUMBER
-----------
1. TABLE OF CONTENTS..........................................
2. STATE LIST.................................................
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21.
22.
23.
24.
25.
26.
27.
28.
29.
30.
31.
32.
33.
PROJECT DATA
TOTAL
REQUEST
($000)
------------
-------
Arizona....................................
Arkansas...................................
California.................................
Colorado...................................
Connecticut................................
Delaware...................................
Georgia....................................
Guam.......................................
Hawaii.....................................
Idaho......................................
Illinois...................................
Kansas.....................................
Kentucky...................................
Louisiana..................................
Maryland...................................
Massachusetts..............................
Michigan...................................
Minnesota..................................
Nebraska...................................
New Hampshire..............................
New Mexico.................................
North Carolina.............................
North Dakota...............................
Puerto Rico................................
Rhode Island...............................
South Dakota...............................
Texas......................................
Virgin Islands (U.S........................
Washington.................................
West Virginia..............................
Wisconsin..................................
Wyoming....................................
Worldwide Various..........................
TOTAL
16,500
51,500
19,000
106,500
41,000
27,000
27,400
19,000
38,000
23,800
15,000
67,000
19,500
33,500
5,500
23,000
19,000
37,750
14,700
36,000
8,500
1,551
11,200
12,300
27,000
25,000
5,100
25,000
25,000
35,200
5,700
14,400
37,063
i
iii
1
7
25
31
53
59
65
77
83
89
101
107
117
123
135
141
147
153
171
183
193
199
205
211
221
227
233
245
251
257
269
275
281
$873,664
PAGE NO. i
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO.
ii
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY 2011
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
CITY/INSTALLATION
LOCATION
-------CAT PROJECT
CODE NUMBER
---- -------
PROJECT TITLE/COUNT
-------------------
NEW/
CURRENT
MISSION
-------
ARMY
REQUEST
$000
-------
1390
PAGE
----
Current
16,500
1
Arizona
_______
Florence, Florence Military Reservation, AZ
171
40023
TOTAL: Arizona
______________
Readiness Center
1 Project
_________
16,500
__________
Arkansas
________
Fort Smith, Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Cente, AR
178
50173
Live Fire Shoothouse
179
50163
Combined Arms Collective Training Facility
Current
Current
2,500
19,000
7
12
North Little Rock, Camp Joseph T Robinson, AR
214
50043
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
Current
30,000
19
TOTAL: Arkansas
_______________
3 Projects
__________
51,500
__________
California
__________
San Miguel, Camp Roberts Maneuver Training Cente, CA
179
60429
COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY
TOTAL: California
_________________
Current
1 Project
_________
19,000
25
19,000
__________
Colorado
________
Colorado ARNG, CO
171
80067
171
80202
Regional Trainign Institute (RTI),
Readiness Center
Current
New
40,000
7,500
PAGE NO.
iii
31
36
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY 2011
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
CITY/INSTALLATION
LOCATION
-------CAT PROJECT
CODE NUMBER
---- -------
PROJECT TITLE/COUNT
-------------------
Colorado Springs, Colorado Springs Readiness Center, CO
171
80201
Readiness Center
NEW/
CURRENT
MISSION
-------
New
Gypsum, High-Altitude Army Aviation Training, CO
211
80062
Army Aviation Support Fac/High Altitude Avia Current
TOTAL: Colorado
_______________
4 Projects
__________
ARMY
REQUEST
$000
-------
1390
PAGE
----
20,000
41
39,000
47
106,500
__________
Connecticut
___________
Windsor Locks, Army Aviation Support Facility, CT
171
90010
Readiness Center
TOTAL: Connecticut
__________________
Current
1 Project
_________
41,000
53
41,000
__________
Delaware
________
New Castle, New Castle Training Spt Rifle Range , DE
171 100037
Joint Armed Forces Reserve Center
TOTAL: Delaware
_______________
Current
1 Project
_________
27,000
59
27,000
__________
Georgia
_______
Georgia ARNG, GA
171 130127
Readiness Center
New
17,000
65
Dobbins AFB, Dobbins Air Force Base, GA
171 130123
Readiness Center
New
10,400
71
TOTAL: Georgia
______________
PAGE NO.
iv
2 Projects
__________
27,400
__________
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY 2011
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
CITY/INSTALLATION
LOCATION
-------CAT PROJECT
CODE NUMBER
---- -------
PROJECT TITLE/COUNT
-------------------
NEW/
CURRENT
MISSION
-------
ARMY
REQUEST
$000
-------
1390
PAGE
----
Current
19,000
77
Guam
____
Guam ARNG, GM
214 140001
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Ph 1
TOTAL: Guam
___________
1 Project
_________
19,000
__________
Hawaii
______
Kapolei, Kalaeloa Readiness Center, HI
214 150077
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Ph 2
TOTAL: Hawaii
_____________
Current
1 Project
_________
38,000
83
38,000
__________
Idaho
_____
Boise, Gowen Field, ID
721 160093
Barracks (ORTC)
Current
17,500
89
Mountain Home, Edgemeade Training Site, ID
171 160122
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility
Current
6,300
95
TOTAL: Idaho
____________
2 Projects
__________
23,800
__________
Illinois
________
Springfield, Camp Lincoln Training Site, IL
214 179237
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Add/Alt
TOTAL: Illinois
_______________
1 Project
_________
Current
15,000
15,000
__________
PAGE NO.
v
101
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY 2011
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
CITY/INSTALLATION
LOCATION
-------CAT PROJECT
CODE NUMBER
---- -------
PROJECT TITLE/COUNT
-------------------
NEW/
CURRENT
MISSION
-------
ARMY
REQUEST
$000
-------
1390
PAGE
----
New
Current
43,000
24,000
107
112
Kansas
______
Wichita, Wichita East Readiness Center, KS
171 200063
Armed Forces Reserve Center
214 200090
Field Maintenance Shop
TOTAL: Kansas
_____________
2 Projects
__________
67,000
__________
Kentucky
________
Kentucky ARNG, KY
171 210034
TOTAL: Kentucky
_______________
Readiness Center
Current
1 Project
_________
19,500
117
19,500
__________
Louisiana
_________
Louisiana ARNG, LA
211 220222
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility
Minden, Camp Minden, LA
171 220114
Armed Forces Reserve Center
TOTAL: Louisiana
________________
PAGE NO.
vi
2 Projects
__________
Current
5,500
123
Current
28,000
129
33,500
__________
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY 2011
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
CITY/INSTALLATION
LOCATION
-------CAT PROJECT
CODE NUMBER
---- -------
PROJECT TITLE/COUNT
-------------------
NEW/
CURRENT
MISSION
-------
ARMY
REQUEST
$000
-------
1390
PAGE
----
5,500
135
Maryland
________
Maryland ARNG, MD
211 240186
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility
TOTAL: Maryland
_______________
New
1 Project
_________
5,500
__________
Massachusetts
_____________
Bedford, Hanscom Readiness Center, MA
171 250136
JFHQ Addition
TOTAL: Massachusetts
____________________
Current
1 Project
_________
23,000
141
23,000
__________
Michigan
________
Grayling, Camp Grayling Maneuver Training Cent, MI
179 260207
Combined Arms Collective Training Facility
TOTAL: Michigan
_______________
New
1 Project
_________
19,000
147
19,000
__________
Minnesota
_________
Arden Hills, Arden Hills Army Training Site, MN
214 270202
Field Maintenance Shop
Current
29,000
153
Little Falls, Camp Ripley, MN
178 270096
Infantry Squad Battle Course
211 270267
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility
Current
New
4,300
4,450
159
165
TOTAL: Minnesota
________________
3 Projects
__________
37,750
__________
PAGE NO.
vii
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY 2011
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
CITY/INSTALLATION
LOCATION
-------NEW/
CURRENT
MISSION
-------
ARMY
REQUEST
$000
-------
1390
PAGE
----
Lincoln, Lincoln 1776 Readiness Center, NE
171 310110
Readiess Center Add/Alt
Current
3,300
171
Mead, Mead Trng Spt/Field Maint Shop 06/Ut, NE
171 310107
Readiness Center
New
11,400
177
CAT PROJECT
CODE NUMBER
---- -------
PROJECT TITLE/COUNT
-------------------
Nebraska
________
TOTAL: Nebraska
_______________
2 Projects
__________
14,700
__________
New Hampshire
_____________
New Hampshire ARNG, NH
171 330034
Classroom Facility (Regional Training Facili Current
721 330035
Regional Training Institute Barracks Facilit Current
TOTAL: New Hampshire
____________________
2 Projects
__________
21,000
15,000
183
188
36,000
__________
New Mexico
__________
Farmington, Farmington Readiness Center, NM
171 350075
Readiness Center
TOTAL: New Mexico
_________________
PAGE NO.
viii
1 Project
_________
Current
8,500
8,500
__________
193
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY 2011
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
CITY/INSTALLATION
LOCATION
-------CAT PROJECT
CODE NUMBER
---- -------
PROJECT TITLE/COUNT
-------------------
NEW/
CURRENT
MISSION
-------
ARMY
REQUEST
$000
-------
1390
PAGE
----
Current
1,551
199
North Carolina
______________
High Point, High Point Readiness Center, NC
171
370898
Readiness Center Add/Alt
TOTAL: North Carolina
_____________________
1 Project
_________
1,551
__________
North Dakota
____________
Devils Lake, Camp Grafton, ND
171 380014
Readiness Center Add/Alt
TOTAL: North Dakota
___________________
Current
1 Project
_________
11,200
205
11,200
__________
Puerto Rico
___________
Salinas, MTA Camp Santiago, PR
178 436021
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
178 436023
Live Fire Shoot House
TOTAL: Puerto Rico
__________________
Current
Current
2 Projects
__________
9,200
3,100
211
216
12,300
__________
Rhode Island
____________
East Greenwich, Camp Fogarty Training Site, RI
442 440009
USPFO
TOTAL: Rhode Island
___________________
1 Project
_________
Current
27,000
27,000
__________
PAGE NO.
ix
221
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY 2011
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
CITY/INSTALLATION
LOCATION
-------CAT PROJECT
CODE NUMBER
---- -------
PROJECT TITLE/COUNT
-------------------
NEW/
CURRENT
MISSION
-------
ARMY
REQUEST
$000
-------
1390
PAGE
----
25,000
227
South Dakota
____________
Watertown, Watertown Range Training Site, SD
171 460085
Readiness Center
TOTAL: South Dakota
___________________
New
1 Project
_________
25,000
__________
Texas
_____
Bastrop, Camp Swift, TX
178 480290
Urban Assault Course
Current
2,600
233
Powderly, Camp Maxey, TX
178 480267
Combat Pistol/Military Pistol Qualification
Current
2,500
239
TOTAL: Texas
____________
2 Projects
__________
5,100
__________
Virgin Islands (U.S.)
_____________________
St Croix, Joint Forces HQs, VQ
171 520034
Readiness Center (JFHQ)
TOTAL: Virgin Islands (U.S.
____________________________
Current
1 Project
_________
25,000
245
25,000
__________
Washington
__________
Tacoma, Camp Murray, WA
214 530022
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
TOTAL: Washington
_________________
PAGE NO.
x
1 Project
_________
Current
25,000
25,000
__________
251
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY 2011
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
CITY/INSTALLATION
LOCATION
-------CAT PROJECT
CODE NUMBER
---- -------
PROJECT TITLE/COUNT
-------------------
NEW/
CURRENT
MISSION
-------
ARMY
REQUEST
$000
-------
1390
PAGE
----
West Virginia
_____________
West Virginia ARNG, WV
171 540084
Readiness Center
New
14,200
257
Morgantown, Morgantown Readiness Center, WV
171 540068
Readiness Center
Current
21,000
263
TOTAL: West Virginia
____________________
2 Projects
__________
35,200
__________
Wisconsin
_________
Madison, Madison Army Aviation Support Facili, WI
113 550139
Rotary Wing Parking Apron
TOTAL: Wisconsin
________________
Current
1 Project
_________
5,700
269
5,700
__________
Wyoming
_______
Laramie, Laramie Readiness Center, WY
214 560116
Field Maintenance Shop
TOTAL: Wyoming
______________
Current
1 Project
_________
14,400
275
14,400
__________
Worldwide Various
_________________
Minor Construction, WW
000
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION
Current
11,400
PAGE NO.
xi
281
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM FY 2011
ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
CITY/INSTALLATION
LOCATION
-------CAT PROJECT
CODE NUMBER
---- -------
PROJECT TITLE/COUNT
-------------------
Planning and Design, WW
000 990034
Planning and Design
TOTAL: Worldwide Various
________________________
GRAND TOTAL
___________
PAGE NO.
xii
NEW/
CURRENT
MISSION
-------
ARMY
REQUEST
$000
-------
Current
25,663
2 Projects
__________
37,063
__________
Total Cost of New Mission projects
(11)
177,450
Total Cost of Current Mission Projects
Total Cost of other line items
(39)
(0)
696,214
0
Total Cost of FY 2011 MCNG Projects
___________________________________
(50)
____
873,664
__________
1390
PAGE
----
APPROPRIATION LANGUAGE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
For construction, acquisition, expansion, rehabilitation, and conversion of
facilities for the training and administration of the Army National Guard, and
contiguous therefore, as authorized by Chapter 1803 of Title 10, United States
Code, as amended, and Military Construction Authorization Acts $873,664,000
to remain available until 30 September 2015.
Congressional Reports
H.R. 111-188
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, VETERANS AFFAIRS, AND RELATED AGENCIES
APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2010 JUNE 26, 2009.—[To accompany H.R. 3082]
(Page 25)
North Carolina—Morrisville: Army Aviation Support Facility.—
The Committee recognizes the importance to the North Carolina National Guard of
Army Aviation Support Facility (AASF) #1 located at Morrisville, North Carolina. The
current AASF was built in 1988 and requires a fixed wing annex to permit necessary
maintenance of assigned aircraft. The Committee urges the Army National
Guard to consider including this facility in the next Future Years Defense Plan, and
directs the Director of the Army National Guard to submit to the Committee a status
report on the design of this facility no later than February 1, 2010.
ARNG Response: NGB will consider this project in the Installations
Requirements Plan and Program Objectives Memorandum process for Fiscal Year
2016 through 2017.
North Carolina—Murphy: Fire Fighting Team Support Facility.—
The Committee recognizes the importance of a new facility to support the relocation of
the 430th Engineer Detachment (Firefighting) of the North Carolina National Guard. The
Committee urges the Army National Guard to consider including this project in the next
Future Years Defense Plan and directs the Director of the Army National Guard to
submit a status report on the design of this project no later than February 1, 2010.
ARNG Response: NGB will consider this project in the Installations
Requirements Plan and Program Objectives Memorandum process for Fiscal Year
2016 through 2017.
Committee’s Directed Language
H.R. 111-166 NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT FOR FISCAL YEAR
2010 ON H.R. 2647 JUNE 18, 2009.
(Page 522)
Planning and Design, Army National Guard The committee recommends that, within the
authorized amounts for planning and design, the Secretary of the Army complete
planning and design activities for the following projects:
(1) $5,446,000—Readiness Center, Kapolei, Hawaii;…
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 522)
Planning and Design, Army National Guard The committee recommends that, within the
authorized amounts for planning and design, the Secretary of the Army complete
planning and design activities for the following projects:…
(2) $1,240,000—Readiness Center, West Memphis, Arkansas;…
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 522)
Planning and Design, Army National Guard The committee recommends that, within the
authorized amounts for planning and design, the Secretary of the Army complete
planning and design activities for the following projects:…
(3) $334,000—Joint Forces Headquarters, Frankfort, Kentucky;
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 522)
Planning and Design, Army National Guard
The committee recommends that, within the authorized amounts for planning and
design, the Secretary of the Army complete planning and design activities for the
following projects:…
(4) $440,000—Barracks Replacement PH 2, Camp Grayling, Minneapolis;
[SHOULD BE M. Committee has been notified]
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 522)
Planning and Design, Army National Guard
The committee recommends that, within the authorized amounts for planning and
design, the Secretary of the Army complete planning and design activities for the
following projects:…
(5) $727,000—CST Ready Building, Las Vegas, Nevada;
ARNG Response: The State has been issued design funds for this project.
(Page 522)
Planning and Design, Army National Guard
The committee recommends that, within the authorized amounts for planning and
design, the Secretary of the Army complete planning and design activities for the
following projects:…
(6) $368,000—Water Supply System, Camp Rilea, Oregon;
ARNG Response: The State has been issued design funds for this project.
(Page 522)
Planning and Design, Army National Guard
The committee recommends that, within the authorized amounts for planning and
design, the Secretary of the Army complete planning and design activities for the
following projects:…
(7) $924,000—Readiness Center, Luzerne, Pennsylvania;
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 522)
Planning and Design, Army National Guard
The committee recommends that, within the authorized amounts for planning and
design, the Secretary of the Army complete planning and design activities for the
following projects:…
(8) $501,000—Readiness Center, Logan/Mingo County, West Virginia;
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
… (9) $2,234,000—Readiness Center, Parkersburg, West Virginia; …
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
… (10) $967,000—Field Maintenance Shop, Parkersburg, West Virginia.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 522)
Unspecified Minor Construction, Army National Guard The committee recommends that,
within the authorized amounts for unspecified minor construction, the Secretary of the
Army complete unspecified minor construction activities for the following projects:
(1) $1,963,000—Motor Vehicle Storage Building, Freedom Center Armory, Camp
Dodge, Idaho; [should be IA, Committee has been notified]
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 3rd quarter of FY 2010.
(2) $2,000,000—Army Aviation Support Facility Addition/Alteration, Davenport,
Idaho; [should be IA, Committee has been notified]
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 3rd quarter of FY 2010.
(3) $2,000,000—Readiness Center Addition/Alteration, Iowa Falls, Idaho; [should
be IA, Committee has been notified]
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 3rd quarter of FY 2010.
(4) $2,000,000—Field Maintenance Shop Addition/Alteration, Fairfield, Idaho;
[should be IA, Committee has been notified]
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 3rd quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 522)
Unspecified Minor Construction, Army National Guard The committee recommends that,
within the authorized amounts for unspecified minor construction, the Secretary of the
Army complete unspecified minor construction activities for the following projects:…
(5) $1,750,000—Troop Medical Facility Addition/Alteration, Fort Harrison,
Montana;
ARNG Response: NGB issued design funds and Construction Authority for this
project.
(Page 522)
Unspecified Minor Construction, Army National Guard The committee recommends that,
within the authorized amounts for unspecified minor construction, the Secretary of the
Army complete unspecified minor construction activities for the following projects:…
(6) $2,000,000—Joint Forces Headquarters Addition, Beightler Armory, Ohio;
ARNG Response: NGB issued design funds and Construction Authority for this
project.
…(7) $2,000,000—Shoot House, Ravenna, Ohio;…
ARNG Response: NGB issued design funds and Construction Authority for this
project.
(Page 522)
Unspecified Minor Construction, Army National Guard The committee recommends that,
within the authorized amounts for unspecified minor construction, the Secretary of the
Army complete unspecified minor construction activities for the following projects:…
(8) $1,996,000—Bachelor Quarters Addition/Alteration, Ethan Allen Range,
Vermont;
ARNG Response: NGB issued design funds and Construction Authority for this
project.
(Page 522)
Unspecified Minor Construction, Army National Guard The committee recommends that,
within the authorized amounts for unspecified minor construction, the Secretary of the
Army complete unspecified minor construction activities for the following projects:…
(9) $1,669,000—Urban Assault Course, Camp Santiago, Puerto Rico.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 4th quarter of FY 2010.
H.R. 111-188
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, VETERANS AFFAIRS, AND RELATED AGENCIES
APPROPRIATIONS BILL, 2010 JUNE 26, 2009.—[To accompany H.R. 3082]
(Page 24)
Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs
that not less than the specified amounts be made available for the design of the
following projects:
Arkansas—West Memphis, Readiness Center, $1,240,000.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 24)
Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs
that not less than the specified amounts be made available for the design of the
following projects:
Hawaii—Kapolei, Readiness Center (Joint Forces Headquarters, $5,446,000.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 25)
Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that
not less than the specified amounts be made available for construction of the following
projects:
Iowa—Camp Dodge, Motor Vehicle Storage Buildings (Freedom Center Armory),
$1,963,000….
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 3rd quarter of FY 2010.
…Iowa—Davenport, Army Aviation Support Facility Addition/Alteration,
$2,000,000….
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 3rd quarter of FY 2010.
…Iowa—Fairfield, Field Maintenance Shop Addition/Alteration, $2,000,000…
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 3rd quarter of FY 2010.
…Iowa—Iowa Falls, Addition/Alteration Readiness Center, $2,000,000…
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 3rd quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 24)
Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs
that not less than the specified amounts be made available for the design of the
following projects:
Kentucky—Frankfort, Joint Forces Headquarters, $334,000.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 25)
Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs
that not less than the specified amounts be made available for the design of the
following projects:
Michigan—Camp Grayling, Barracks Replacement, Phase 2,$440,000.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 25)
Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs
that not less than the specified amounts be made available for the design of the
following projects:
Nevada—Las Vegas, Civil Support Team Ready Building,$727,000.
ARNG Response: The State has been issued design funds for this project.
(Page 25)
Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs
that not less than the specified amounts be made available for the design of the
following projects:
Oregon—Camp Rilea, Water Supply System, $368,000.
ARNG Response: The State has been issued design funds for this project.
(Page 25)
Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs
that not less than the specified amounts be made available for the design of the
following projects:
Pennsylvania—Luzerne, Readiness Center, $924,000.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 25)
Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs
that not less than the specified amounts be made available for the design of the
following projects:
West Virginia—Logan/Mingo County, Readiness Center, $501,000…
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
…West Virginia—Parkersburg, Readiness Center, $2,234,000…
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
…West Virginia—Parkersburg, Field Maintenance Shop, $967,000.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 25)
Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that
not less than the specified amounts be made available for construction of the following
projects:
Kentucky—London, Phase IV Aviation Operations Facility, $1,805,000.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 3rd quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 25)
Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that
not less than the specified amounts be made available for construction of the following
projects:
Montana—Fort Harrison, Addition/Alteration Troop Medical Facility, $1,750,000.
ARNG Response: NGB issued design funds and Construction Authority for this
project.
(Page 25)
Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that
not less than the specified amounts be made available for construction of the following
projects:
Ohio—Beightler Armory, Joint Forces Headquarters Addition, $2,000,000…
ARNG Response: NGB issued design funds and Construction Authority for this
project.
…Ohio—Ravenna Training Site, Shoot House, $2,000,000.
ARNG Response: NGB issued design funds and Construction Authority for this
project.
(Page 25)
Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that
not less than the specified amounts be made available for construction of the following
projects:
Puerto Rico—Camp Santiago, Urban Assault Course, $1,669,000.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 4th quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 25)
Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that
not less than the specified amounts be made available for construction of the following
projects:
Vermont—Ethan Allen Range, BOQ Addition/Alteration, $1,996,000.
ARNG Response: NGB issued design funds and Construction Authority for this
project.
Senate Report 111-40
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION AND VETERANS AFFAIRS AND RELATED AGENCIES
APPROPRIATION BILL, 2010 JULY 7, 2009 [To accompany S.1407]
(Page 24)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
Addition/Alteration Davenport Army Aviation Facility, Davenport, Iowa.—Of the
funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that
$2,000,000 be made available for the construction of this facility.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 3rd quarter of FY 2010.
Armed Forces Reserve Center/Field Maintenance Shop, Johnston, Iowa.—Of the
funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that
$180,000 be made available for the design of this facility.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 24)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
Joint Force Headquarters, Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts.—
Of the funds provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs
that $2,663,000 be made available for the design of this facility
ARNG Response: The State has been issued design funds for this project.
(Page 24)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
Addition/Alteration Clark County Armory, Floyd Edsall Training Center, Nevada.—
Of the funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that
$2,000,000 be made available for the construction of this facility.
ARNG Response: The State has been issued design funds and Construction
Authority for this project.
(Page 24)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
Raymond J. Bohn Readiness Center Addition, Bismarck, North Dakota.—Of the
funds provided for minor construction in this account, the Committee directs that
$2,000,000 be made available for the construction of this facility.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds and Construction
Authority for this project NLT 3rd quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 24)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
Storm Water and Sewer Infrastructure Improvements, Camp Withycombe,
Clackamas County, Oregon.—Of the funds provided for planning and design in this
account, the Committee directs that $1,226,000 be made available for the design of this
project.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 24)
Washington County Readiness Center, Hillsboro, Oregon.—Of the funds provided
for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $386,000 be made
available for the design of this facility.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
(Page 24)
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION, ARMY NATIONAL GUARD
Morrisville Field Vehicle Maintenance Shop, Morrisville, Vermont.—Of the funds
provided for planning and design in this account, the Committee directs that $812,000
be made available for the design of this facility.
ARNG Response: NGB anticipates issuing design funds for this project NLT 3rd
quarter of FY 2010.
Military Construction Army National Guard, Future Years Defense Program
FY 2011- FY 2015
Fiscal
Year
State
2011
2011
2011
2011
AK Bethel
AZ Florence
Town or Installation
Facility
Category
Project Title
2011
Budgeted
Amount
Prior FYDP
PB09
2011
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
171
171
0
16,500
16,179
11,061
2011
AR
Camp Robinson
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
214
30,000
12,964
2011
AR
Fort Chaffee
179
19,000
20,100
2011
AR
Fort Chaffee
Combined Arms Collective Training
Facility
Live Fire Shoot House
178
2,500
0
2011
CA
Camp Roberts
2011
CO
2011
179
19,000
20,200
Gypsum/Eagle
Combined Arms Collective Training
Facility
HAATS/AASF
211
39,000
35,090
CO
Fort Carson
Regional Training Institute
171
40,000
41,360
2011
CO
Fort Carson
Barracks Complex (ORTC)
721
0
43,532
2011
CO
Colorado Springs
Readiness Center
171
20,000
0
2011
2011
CO
CT
Windsor
Windsor Locks
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
171
171
7,500
41,000
0
46,000
2011
DE
New Castle
Armed Forces Reserve Center(JFHQ)
171
27,000
13,526
2011
DC
Washington
610
0
4,670
2011
2011
GA
GA
Dobbins
Cumming
United States Property and Fiscal Office,
Add/Alt
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
171
171
10,400
17,000
0
0
2011
GU
Barrigada
Combined Support Maint Shop Ph1
214
19,000
17,834
2011
2011
HI
HI
Kalaeloa
Kalaeloa
Readiness Center Ph1
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
Ph2A
171
214
0
38,000
32,343
19,801
2011
ID
Gowen Field
Barracks (ORTC)
721
17,500
13,065
Change
Explanation
Proj No
MDEP
Pgm
0
(16,179) Project was appropriated in FY 2009
5,439 Increased cost. Includes a $0.700M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
17,036 Increased cost. Includes a $1.400M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
(1,100) Directed cost adjustment based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
2,500 Moved 2012 to 2011; Range program
cost adjustment
(1,200) Directed cost adjustment based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
3,910 Increased cost. Includes a $2.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
(1,360) Change in cost. Includes a $3.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
(43,532) Moved 2011 to 2012. Adjustment for
inflation assumptions.
20,000 Grow the Army Insertion. Includes a
$1.000M directed cost reduction based on
actual construction cost de-escalation.
2011
20123
040023
AA
EAMF
EAMF
AA
Mod For
Mod For
050043
EAMF
Mod For
050163
VSRM
Range
050173
VSRM
Range
060429
VSRM
Range
080062
ERVT
Mod For
080067
E3H6
Revit
080093
E3H6
Revit
080201
EGRO
Grow
7,500 Grow the Army Insertion
(5,000) Directed cost adjustment based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
13,474 Increased cost. Includes a $1.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
(4,670) Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
080202
090010
EGRO
Grow
EAMF Mod For
100037
ERVT
Revit
110007
ERVT
Mod For
10,400 Grow the Army Insertion
17,000 Grow the Army Insertion. Includes a
$1.000M directed cost reduction based on
actual construction cost de-escalation.
130123
130127
EGRO
EGRO
Grow
Grow
140001
ERVT
Revit
150043
150077
ERVT
ERVT
Revit
Revit
160093
E3H9
Revit
1,166 Increased cost. Includes a $1.100M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
(32,343) Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
18,199 Increased cost. Includes a $3.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
4,435 Increased cost. Includes a $1.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
Military Construction Army National Guard, Future Years Defense Program
FY 2011- FY 2015
Fiscal
Year
2011
State
Town or Installation
ID
Mountain Home
Project Title
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System
Facility
Facility
Category
211
Budgeted Prior FYDP
Amount
PB09
6,300
0
Change
Explanation
6,300 TUAS project inserted. Includes a
$0.200M directed cost reduction based on
actual construction cost de-escalation.
Proj No
160122
MDEP
EAMF
Pgm
Revit
(22,500) Moved 2011 to 2013. Increased cost.
7,800 Increased cost. Includes a $1.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
(19,000) Reduced cost. Previous PA included
other service share. Includes a $3.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
170127
179237
EAMF
EAMF
Mod For
Mod For
200063
EAMF
Mod For
(1,000) Change in cost. Includes a $1.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
(2,227) Project was appropriated in FY 2010
14,000 Increased cost. Includes a $0.900M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
22,290 Increased cost. Includes a $2.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
5,500 Grow the Army Insertion
200090
EAMF
Mod For
200103
210034
ERVT
EAMF
Mod For
Mod For
220114
ERVT
Revit
220222
EAMF
Revit
230046
240186
ERVT
EAMF
Revit
Revit
2011
2011
IL
IL
Kankakee
Springfield
Army Aviation Support Facility
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
Add/Alt
211
214
0
15,000
22,500
7,200
2011
KS
Wichita East
Armed Forces Reserve Center
171
43,000
62,000
2011
KS
Wichita East
Field Maintenance Shop
214
24,000
25,000
2011
2011
KS
KY
Salina
Burlington
Taxiway Alterations
Readiness Center
112
171
0
19,500
2,227
5,500
2011
LA
Minden
Armed Forces Reserve Center
171
28,000
5,710
2011
LA
Fort Polk
211
5,500
0
2011
2011
ME
MD
Bangor
Webster Field
171
211
0
5,500
8,003
0
2011
MA
Westfield
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System
Facility
Readiness Center
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System
Facility
Readiness Center Add/Alt
171
0
15,356
(15,356) Mass TAG request to move funding from
250115 to 250136. Increased Cost.
250115
ERVT
Revit
2011
MA
Hanscom AFB
Armed Forces Reserve Center (JFHQ)
Ph2
171
23,000
0
23,000 Mass TAG request to move funding from
250115 to 250136. Increased Cost.
250136
ERVT
Revit
2011
MI
Camp Grayling
179
19,000
20,200
VSRM
Range
MN
Camp Ripley
178
4,300
0
270096
VSRM
Range
2011
MN
Arden Hills
Field Maintenance Shop
214
29,000
23,200
270202
EAMF
Mod For
2011
MN
Camp Ripley
211
4,450
0
270267
EAMF
Revit
2011
NE
Mead
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System
Facility
Readiness Center
(1,200) Directed cost adjustment based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
4,300 Moved 2012 to 2011. Range program
cost adjustment
5,800 Increased cost. Includes a $3.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
4,450 Grow the Army Insertion
260207
2011
Combined Arms Collective Training
Facility
Infantry Squad Battle Course
171
11,400
0
11,400 Grow the Army Insertion. Includes a
$0.600M directed cost reduction based on
actual construction cost de-escalation.
310107
EGRO
Grow
2011
2011
NE
NE
Grand Island
Lincoln
Readiness Center
Readiness Center Add/Alt
171
171
0
3,300
5,739
0
(5,739) Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
3,300 Grow the Army Insertion
310085
310110
ERVT
EGRO
Revit
Grow
(8,003) Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
5,500 Grow the Army Insertion
Military Construction Army National Guard, Future Years Defense Program
FY 2011- FY 2015
Fiscal
Year
2011
State
Town or Installation
NH Pembroke
Project Title
Classroom Facility (Regional Training
Institute)
Facility
Category
171
Budgeted Prior FYDP
Amount
PB09
21,000
11,765
2011
NH
Pembroke
Barracks Facility (Regional Training
Institute)
721
15,000
26,177
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
NJ
NM
NM
NC
ND
Lakehurst
Santa Fe
Farmington
High Point
Camp Grafton
Army Aviation Support Facility
Readiness Center Add/Alt
Readiness Center
Readiness Center Add/Alt
Readiness Center Add/Alt
211
171
171
171
171
0
0
8,500
1,551
11,200
42,885
3,852
0
0
11,173
2011
2011
2011
OR
OR
PR
The Dalles
Boardman
Camp Santiago
Readiness Center
Multi Purpose Training Range
Multipurpose Machine Gun Range
(MPMG)
171
178
178
0
0
9,200
9,059
7,700
0
2011
PR
Camp Santiago
Live Fire Shoot House
178
3,100
0
2011
RI
East Greenwich
United States Property and Fiscal Office
610
27,000
9,000
2011
SD
Watertown
Readiness Center
171
25,000
20,947
2011
TX
Camp Maxey
178
2,500
0
2011
TX
Camp Swift
Combat Pistol/Military Pistol Qualification
Course
Urban Assault Course
178
2,600
0
2011
VI
St. Croix
Readiness Center (JFHQ)
171
25,000
8,500
2011
WA
Tacoma
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
214
25,000
0
2011
WV
Morgantown
Readiness Center
171
21,000
20,911
2011
WV
Moorefield
Readiness Center
171
14,200
11,597
2011
2011
WI
WY
Madison
Laramie
Aircraft Parking
Field Maintenance Shop
113
214
5,700
14,400
5,292
5,011
2011
ZZZ
Various
Grow the Army Construction
171
0
82,000
Change
Explanation
9,235 Exchange of funds between related NH
projects. Includes a $1.000M directed
cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
(11,177) Exchange of funds between related NH
projects. Includes a $1.000M directed
cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
(42,885) Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
(3,852) Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
8,500 Grow the Army Insertion
1,551 Grow the Army Insertion
27 Increased cost. Includes a $0.500M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
(9,059) Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
(7,700) Range project cancelled.
9,200 Moved 2013 to 2011. Range program
cost adjustment. Project related to Grow
the Army.
3,100 Moved 2013 to 2011. Range program
cost adjustment. Project related to Grow
the Army.
18,000 Increased cost. Includes a $1.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
4,053 Increased cost. Includes a $1.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
2,500 Range project insertion
Proj No
330034
MDEP
ERVT
Pgm
Revit
330035
E3H6
Revit
340115
350115
350075
370898
380014
EAMF Mod For
EAMF Mod For
EGRO
Grow
EGRO
Grow
ERVT
Revit
410026
410130
436021
ERVT
VSRM
VSRM
Revit
Range
Range
436023
VSRM
Range
440009
ERVT
Mod For
460085
EAMF
Mod For
480267
VSRM
Range
2,600 Moved 2012 to 2011. Range program
cost adjustment
16,500 Increased cost. Includes a $1.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
25,000 Moved 2010 to 2011. Increased cost.
Includes a $1.000M directed cost
reduction based on actual construction
cost de-escalation.
89 Increased cost. Includes a $1.000M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
2,603 Increased cost. Includes a $0.800M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
408 Increased cost
9,389 Increased cost. Includes a $0.800M
directed cost reduction based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
(82,000) Grow the Army funding assigned to
projects.
480290
VSRM
Range
520034
ERVT
Revit
530022
EAMF
Mod For
540068
EAMF
Mod For
540084
ERVT
Revit
550139
560116
ERVT
ERVT
Mod For
Revit
990071
EGRO
Grow
Military Construction Army National Guard, Future Years Defense Program
FY 2011- FY 2015
Fiscal
Year
2011
2011
State
Town or Installation
ZZZ Various
ZZZ Various
2012
2012
2012
2012
AL Fort McClellan TC
AL Fort McClellan TC
Facility
Project Title
Category
Unspecified Minor Construction
Planning and Design
Total FY 2011 Program Request
2012
Budgeted Prior FYDP
Amount
PB09
11,400
11,400
25,663
40,917
873,664
878,546
Change
Explanation
Proj No
990022
990033
MDEP
E315
E314
0
1,233
(2,600) Range project cancelled.
2012
010263
010277
AA
AA
EAMF Mod For
VSRM Range
0
(15,254)
(4,882)
Pgm
UMC
PD
2012
2012
AZ
AR
Papago Military Reservation
Fort Chaffee
2012
AR
Fort Chaffee
2012
Readiness Center Ph2
Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point
Range
Readiness Center Add/Alt
Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point
Range
Live Fire Shoot House
2012
2012
CA
CA
Camp San Luis Obispo
Camp Roberts
Field Maintenance Shop
Utilities Replacement Ph1
214
832
8,000
32,000
6,250
25,000
2012
CA
Fort Irwin
Maneuver Area Training & Equipment
Site Ph3
214
0
27,600
2012
CA
Camp Roberts
211
6,160
0
2012
CO
Fort Carson
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System
Facility
Barracks Complex (ORTC)
721
43,000
0
2012
2012
CO
CO
Alamosa
Aurora
171
211
6,400
3,600
0
0
2012
2012
2012
CT
DE
DC
Camp Hartell
Bethany Beach
Washington
214
171
610
0
0
5,300
32,000
5,443
0
(32,000) Moved 2012 to 2013.
(5,443) Moved 2012 to 2013.
5,300 Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
090043
100010
110007
EAMF
ERVT
ERVT
Mod For
Revit
Mod For
2012
2012
FL
FL
Miramar
Camp Blanding
171
178
0
2,400
13,976
2,600
(13,976) Moved 2012 to 2013. Increased cost.
(200) Range program cost adjustment
120102
120188
ERVT
VSRM
Revit
Range
2012
2012
FL
FL
Camp Blanding
Camp Blanding
178
178
3,100
0
2,000
8,000
120193
120213
VSRM
VSRM
Range
Range
2012
GA
Hinesville
214
0
17,500
1,100 Range program cost adjustment
(8,000) Moved 2012 to 2015. Range program
cost adjustment.
(17,500) Moved 2012 to 2013.
130063
ERVT
Revit
2012
2012
2012
GA
HI
ID
130120
150043
160170
EGRO
ERVT
VSRM
Grow
Revit
Range
2012
2012
2012
11,000 Grow the Army Insertion
33,000 Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
(13,000) Moved 2012 to 2014. Range program
cost adjustment.
(17,693) Moved 2012 to 2013. Reduced cost.
10,000 Grow the Army Insertion.
15,000 Mobilization Platform Insertion.
170033
170801
180142
EAMF Mod For
EGRO
Grow
RJT9
RJT9
2012
2012
180144
180012
EGRO
ERVT
Readiness Center
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System
Facility
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
Regional Training Institute
United States Property and Fiscal Office,
Add/Alt
Readiness Center
Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point
Range
Live Fire Shoot House
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
171
178
16,500
0
15,267
2,600
171
178
17,800
3,500
0
2,600
17,800 Grow the Army Insertion
900 Range program cost adjustment
040294
050172
EGRO
VSRM
Grow
Range
178
0
2,000
(2,000) Moved 2012 to 2011; Range program
cost adjustment
1,750 Increased cost
7,000 State requested exchange of funding
between 2 CA projects (060009 and
060413) for executability & revised
estimates. Increased Cost
050173
VSRM
Range
060170
060009
ERVT
ERVT
Revit
Mod For
(27,600) Moved 2012 to 2013. State requested
exchange of funding between 2 CA
projects (060009 and 060413) for
executability & revised estimates.
6,160 Grow the Army Insertion
060413
ERVT
Revit
60438
EAMF
Revit
43,000 Moved 2011 to 2012. Directed
adjustment for inflation assumptions.
6,400 Grow the Army Insertion
3,600 Grow the Army Insertion
080093
E3H6
Revit
080126
080206
EGRO
EGRO
Grow
Grow
171
171
178
11,000
33,000
0
0
0
13,000
IL
IL
IN
Maneuver Area Training & Equipment
Site Ph1
Atlanta
Readiness Center
Kalaeloa
Readiness Center Ph1
Orchard Range Training Site, BoiseUpgrade:Multipurpose Range
Complex(MPRC-Range1)
Kankakee
Readiness Center
Cook County
Readiness Center
Camp Atterbury
Railhead Expansion & Container Facility
171
171
903
0
10,000
15,000
17,693
0
0
IN
IN
Allen County
Indianapolis
171
171
25,000
0
0
24,907
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
25,000 Grow the Army Insertion
(24,907) Moved 2012 to 2013. Adjustment for
inflation assumptions.
Grow
Revit
Military Construction Army National Guard, Future Years Defense Program
FY 2011- FY 2015
Fiscal
Year
2012
2012
2012
2012
IN
Camp Atterbury
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
KS
ME
ME
MD
MD
MD
MA
MA
MI
MI
MN
Topeka
Bangor
Brunswick
Dundalk
Westminster
Charles/Calvert County
Camp Edwards
Concord
Camp Grayling
Camp Grayling
Camp Ripley
Facility
Project Title
Category
Engineer Qualification Range
178
Deployment Processing Facility
904
Operations Readiness Training Complex
721
1
Operations Readiness Training Complex
721
2
Taxiway Alterations
112
Readiness Center
171
Armed Forces Reserve Center
171
Readiness Center Add/Alt
171
Readiness Center
171
Readiness Center
171
Unit Training Equipment Site
214
Readiness Center
171
Live Fire Shoot House
178
Urban Assault Course
178
Infantry Squad Battle Course
178
2012
MN
Camp Ripley
Scout Reconnaissance Range
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
MN
MN
MS
MS
MS
MS
Camp Ripley
Saint Paul
Camp Shelby
Camp Shelby
Camp Shelby
Camp Shelby
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
MO
MO
MO
MO
NE
NE
NV
NJ
NJ
NM
NM
NC
NC
OK
Fort Leonard Wood
Kansas City
Monett
Perryville
Grand Island
Mead
Las Vegas
Sea Girt
Lakehurst
Farmington
Santa Fe
Raleigh
Greensboro
Camp Gruber
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
OK
OR
PR
PR
PR
PR
PR
SC
SC
SC
Camp Gruber
The Dalles
Fort Buchanan
Caguas
Ceiba
Fort Buchanan
Camp Santiago
Barnwell
Florence
Florence
State
Town or Installation
IN
Camp Atterbury
IN
Camp Atterbury
IN
Camp Atterbury
Budgeted
Amount
Prior FYDP
PB09
0
6,000
8,900
0
25,000
0
27,000
0
0
15,600
23,000
16,000
10,400
9,000
0
9,000
0
0
0
6,802
0
16,667
0
0
0
22,273
0
2,000
2,000
3,800
178
0
20,000
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
Readiness Center
Troop Housing (ORTC) Ph1
Rail System & Container Facility
Deployment Processing Facility
Operations Readiness Training Complex
178
171
721
903
904
721
8,400
0
25,000
5,200
13,400
27,000
Regional Training Institute
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Field Maintenance Shop
Barracks (Regional Training Institute)
Army Aviation Support Facility
Readiness Center
Readiness Center Add/Alt
Armed Forces Reserve Center (JFHQ)
Readiness Center Add/Alt
Upgrade:Combined Arms Collective
Training Facility
Live Fire Shoot House
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Field Maintenance Shop Ph2
Readiness Center
171
171
171
171
171
171
214
721
211
171
171
171
171
178
178
171
171
171
171
171
171
171
214
171
Change
Explanation
(6,000) Range Program project cancelled.
8,900 Mobilization Platform Insertion.
25,000 ORTC Project Insertion.
27,000 ORTC Project Insertion.
(6,802)
15,600
6,333
16,000
10,400
9,000
(22,273)
9,000
(2,000)
(2,000)
(3,800)
Proj No
180151
180156
180160
MDEP
VSRM
RJT9
E3H9
Pgm
Range
RJT9
Revit
180161
E3H9
Revit
200102
230046
230071
240017
240187
240193
250065
250135
260210
260211
270096
ERVT Mod For
ERVT
Revit
ERVT Mod For
EAMF Mod For
EGRO
Grow
EGRO
Grow
ERVT
Revit
EGRO
Grow
VSRM Range
VSRM Range
VSRM Range
270236
VSRM
0
17,021
25,000
0
0
0
Moved 2012 to 2013. Increased cost.
Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
Increased cost
Moved 2013 to 2012. Increased cost.
Grow the Army Insertion
Grow the Army Insertion
Moved 2012 to 2013.
Grow the Army Insertion
Project was appropriated in FY 2009.
Project was appropriated in FY 2009.
Moved 2012 to 2011. Range program
cost adjustment
(20,000) Moved 2012 to 2013. Range program
cost adjustment
8,400 Range project insertion.
(17,021) Moved 2012 to 2013.
0
5,200 Mobilization Platform Insertion.
13,400 Mobilization Platform Insertion.
27,000 ORTC Project Insertion.
270266
270238
280315
280386
280387
280389
VSRM Range
EAMF Mod For
E3H9
Revit
RJT9
RJT9
RJT9
RJT9
E3H9
Revit
0
1,900
820
700
22,000
9,100
23,000
0
49,000
0
5,200
0
3,700
18,500
18,254
0
0
0
0
0
17,146
19,724
0
0
0
30,697
0
0
(18,254)
1,900
820
700
22,000
9,100
5,854
(19,724)
49,000
0
5,200
(30,697)
3,700
18,500
290176
290215
290216
290217
310085
310086
320070
340110
340115
350075
350115
370044
370899
400605
ERVT
Revit
EGRO
Grow
EGRO
Grow
EGRO
Grow
ERVT
Revit
EGRO
Grow
EAMF Mod For
E3H6
Revit
EAMF Mod For
EGRO
Grow
EAMF Mod For
ERVT
Revit
EGRO
Grow
VSRM Range
3,000
13,800
57,000
11,400
2,200
3,400
3,800
4,600
0
5,200
2,000
0
52,000
0
0
0
0
0
12,764
0
1,000
13,800
5,000
11,400
2,200
3,400
3,800
4,600
(12,764)
5,200
400606
410026
430010
430803
430804
430805
430806
450106
450424
450368
VSRM Range
ERVT
Revit
EAMF Mod For
EGRO
Grow
EGRO
Grow
EGRO
Grow
EGRO
Grow
EGRO
Grow
EAMF Mod For
EGRO
Grow
Moved 2012 to 2013.
Grow the Army Insertion
Grow the Army Insertion
Grow the Army Insertion
Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
Grow the Army Insertion
Increased cost
Moved 2012 to 2013.
Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
Moved 2012 to 2011
Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
Funded in ARRA of 2009.
Grow the Army Insertion
Moved 2013 to 2012. Range program
cost adjustment.
Range program cost adjustment
Moved 2011 to 2012. Increased cost.
Increased cost
Grow the Army Insertion
Grow the Army Insertion
Grow the Army Insertion
Grow the Army Insertion
Grow the Army Insertion
Moved 2012 to 2013.
Grow the Army Insertion
Range
Military Construction Army National Guard, Future Years Defense Program
FY 2011- FY 2015
Fiscal
Year
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
State
SC
SC
TN
TX
TX
2012
2012
Facility
Category
171
171
171
171
178
Town or Installation
Allendale
Laurens
Tullahoma
Fort Worth
Camp Swift
Project Title
Readiness Center Add/Alt
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Urban Assault Course
UT
VA
Camp Williams
Fort Pickett
2012
2012
2012
VT
WI
WI
Jericho
Wausau
Camp Williams
2012
2012
2012
2012
2012
WV
WY
ZZZ
ZZZ
ZZZ
Buckhannon
Cheyenne
Various
Various
Various
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
Combined Arms Collective Training
Facility
Readiness Center
Field Maintenance Shop
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System
Facility
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Grow the Army Construction
Unspecified Minor Construction
Planning and Design
Total FY 2012 Program Request
2013
2013
2013
AL Fort McClellan
Budgeted Prior FYDP
Amount
PB09
4,300
0
6,200
0
0
10,846
0
12,633
0
2,000
178
179
6,500
19,500
4,000
0
Explanation
Moved 2011 to 2012, State request
Grow the Army Insertion
Project was appropriated in FY 2009.
Moved 2012 to 2013.
Moved 2012 to 2011. Range program
cost adjustment
2,500 Range program cost adjustment
19,500 Range project insertion.
171
214
211
0
0
7,000
8,804
5,810
0
(8,804) Project was appropriated in FY 2009.
(5,810) Moved 2012 to 2013.
7,000 Grow the Army Insertion
171
171
171
10,000
0
0
11,700
21,351
789,531
0
8,904
84,000
11,700
29,547
670,828
Live Fire Shoot House
178
3,200
2,000
2013
2013
2013
AL
Fort McClellan
Urban Assault Course
178
0
2,000
2013
2013
AZ
CA
Sierra Vista
Fort Irwin
Readiness Center
Maneuver Area Training & Equipment
Site Ph3
171
214
0
25,000
7,504
0
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
CT
DE
DE
DC
FL
FL
FL
Camp Hartell
Seaford
Bethany Beach
DC Armory
Miramar
Eglin AFB
Camp Blanding
214
171
171
171
171
171
178
32,000
0
5,443
12,629
14,000
0
17,500
0
7,058
0
12,629
0
5,528
18,000
2013
2013
FL
GA
Camp Blanding
Hinesville
178
214
3,000
17,500
2,000
0
2013
2013
2013
2013
GA
GU
HI
ID
Macon
Barrigada
Kapolei
Gowen Field
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
Readiness Center
Regional Training Institute
DC Armory Renovation
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Upgrade: Combined Arms Collective
Training Facility
Urban Assault Course
Maneuver Area Training & Equipment
Site Ph1
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Army Aviation Support Facility Ph1
Barracks (ORTC)
171
171
211
721
14,500
8,523
28,814
45,000
14,500
8,523
28,814
48,000
2013
2013
2013
2013
IL
IL
IL
IN
Kankakee
Kankakee
Urbana
Indianapolis
Readiness Center
Army Aviation Support Facility
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
171
211
171
171
14,000
28,193
0
24,801
0
0
12,688
0
Change
4,300
6,200
(10,846)
(12,633)
(2,000)
10,000 Grow the Army Insertion
(8,904) Moved 2012 to 2013.
(84,000) Grow the Army projects assigned.
0
(8,196)
118,703
0
1,200 Range program cost adjustment.
Location changed from Eglin AFB, FL to
Fort McClellan, AL.
(2,000) Range project moved from 2013 to 2010.
Location changed from Eglin AFB, FL to
Fort McClellan, AL.
(7,504) Project deleted*
25,000 Moved 2012 to 2013. State requested
exchange of funding between 2 CA
projects (060009 and 060413) for
bilit to
& 2013.
i d ti t
32,000 Movedt 2012
(7,058)
5,443
0
14,000
(5,528)
(500)
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Moved 2012 to 2013.
Moved 2012 to 2013. Increased cost.
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Range program cost adjustment
1,000 Range program cost adjustment
17,500 Moved 2012 to 2013.
0
0
0
(3,000) Directed adjustment for inflation
assumptions.
14,000 Moved 2012 to 2013. Reduced cost.
28,193 Moved 2011 to 2013. Increased cost.
(12,688) Project was appropriated in 2009.
24,801 Moved 2012 to 2013. Directed
adjustment for inflation assumptions.
Proj No
450403
450407
470043
480243
480290
MDEP
EGRO
EGRO
ERVT
ERVT
VSRM
Pgm
Grow
Grow
Revit
Revit
Range
490618
510307
VSRM
VSRM
Range
Range
500052
550142
550245
EAMF Mod For
ERVT
Revit
EGRO
Grow
540085
560702
997101
990022
990033
EGRO
ERVT
EGRO
E315
E314
Grow
Revit
Grow
2013
010278
AA
VSRM
AA
Range
010279
VSRM
Range
040173
060413
EAMF
ERVT
Mod For
Revit
090043
100049
100010
110021
120102
120176
120192
EAMF Mod For
ERVT Mod For
ERVT
Revit
ERVT
Revit
ERVT
Revit
ERVT Mod For
VSRM Range
120194
130063
VSRM
ERVT
Range
Revit
130068
140040
150023
160100
EAMF
ERVT
EAMF
E3H9
Mod For
Mod For
Mod For
Revit
170033
170127
170614
180012
EAMF
EAMF
EAMF
ERVT
Mod For
Mod For
Mod For
Revit
Military Construction Army National Guard, Future Years Defense Program
FY 2011- FY 2015
Fiscal
Year
2013
2013
State
Town or Installation
IN
Terre Haute
IA
Camp Dodge
2013
2013
IA
KS
Camp Dodge
Kansas City
Project Title
Field Maintenance Shop
Multipurpose Machine Gun Range
(MPMG)
Urban Assault Course
Readiness Center
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
KS
KY
ME
MD
MD
Topeka
Frankfort
Augusta
Dundalk
Reisterstown
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
MD
MA
MA
MI
MI
MI
MN
MN
Easton
Camp Edwards
Camp Edwards
Camp Grayling
Camp Grayling
Camp Grayling
Stillwater
Camp Ripley
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
MN
MN
MS
MO
MT
MT
NV
NJ
NJ
NM
NY
Saint Paul
Camp Ripley
Pascagoula
Fort Leonard Wood
Miles City
Helena
Elko
Sea Girt
Sea Girt
Socorro
Camp Smith
2013
2013
2013
2013
NY
OH
OH
OK
2013
2013
Facility
Category
214
178
Budgeted Prior FYDP
Amount
PB09
8,952
8,952
0
4,500
Change
Explanation
0
(4,500) Range program project cancellation.
Proj No
180106
190141
MDEP
Pgm
ERVT Mod For
VSRM Range
190142
200101
VSRM Range
EAMF Mod For
200102
210001
230113
240017
240028
ERVT
EAMF
ERVT
EAMF
ERVT
240173
250065
250095
260180
260051
260212
270014
270236
EAMF Mod For
ERVT
Revit
ERVT Mod For
E3H9
Revit
E3H9
Revit
VSRM Range
EAMF Mod For
VSRM Range
270238
270258
280272
290176
300032
300128
320069
340110
340112
350029
360139
EAMF
VSRM
EAMF
ERVT
EAMF
EAMF
ERVT
E3H6
ERVT
ERVT
EAMF
Mod For
Range
Mod For
Revit
Mod For
Mod For
Mod For
Revit
Mod For
Mod For
Mod For
360161
390230
390256
400066
EAMF
ERVT
EAMF
ERVT
Mod For
Revit
Mod For
Mod For
400605
VSRM
Range
420051
ERVT
Mod For
178
171
3,000
0
2,000
34,000
Taxiway Alterations
Army Aviation Support Facility
Armed Forces Reserve Center
Readiness Center Add/Alt
United States Property and Fiscal Office
112
211
171
171
442
9,500
32,000
0
0
0
0
32,000
22,804
14,832
11,166
1,000
(34,000) Moved 2013 to 2015. Directed
adjustment for inflation assumptions.
9,500 Moved 2012 to 2013. Increased cost.
0
(22,804) Moved 2013 to 2014.
(14,832) Moved 2013 to 2012. Increased cost.
(11,166) Moved 2013 to 2014.
Readiness Center
Unit Training Equipment Site
Regional Training Institute
Barracks Replacement (ORTC) Ph1
Barracks Replacement (ORTC) Ph2
Infantry Squad Battle Course
Readiness Center
Scout Reconnaissance Range
171
214
171
721
721
178
171
178
0
22,273
0
0
0
0
0
18,500
13,748
0
18,962
16,800
16,800
2,000
14,136
0
(13,748)
22,273
(18,962)
(16,800)
(16,800)
(2,000)
(14,136)
18,500
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Regional Training Institute
Readiness Center
Readiness Center Add/Alt
Readiness Center
Barracks (Regional Training Institute)
Regional Training Institute Ph2
Readiness Center Add/Alt
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
171
178
171
171
171
171
171
721
171
171
214
17,021
4,100
0
18,254
0
0
0
19,724
0
0
0
0
3,000
4,500
0
4,697
16,080
5,800
0
15,396
4,775
32,771
17,021
1,100
(4,500)
18,254
(4,697)
(16,080)
(5,800)
19,724
(15,396)
(4,775)
(32,771)
New York
Delaware
Chillicothe
Camp Gruber
Readiness Center Add/Alt
Readiness Center
Field Maintenance Shop
Operations Readiness Training Complex
171
171
214
171
23,988
12,000
3,100
25,000
23,988
7,457
2,354
25,000
OK
Camp Gruber
178
0
18,000
PA
Fort Indiantown Gap
Upgrade:Combined Arms Collective
Training Facility
EAATS Aviation Training and
Maintenance Facility
171
0
25,000
Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point Range
Moved 2013 to 2015. Cost increase.
Moved 2012 to 2013.
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Project was appropriated in FY 2009.
Moved 2013 to 2014. Increased cost.
Project was appropriated in FY 2009.
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Moved 2012 to 2013. Range program
cost adjustment
Moved 2012 to 2013.
Range program cost adjustment
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Moved 2012 to 2013.
Moved 2013 to 2014. Increased cost.
Moved 2013 to 2014. Increased cost.
Project was appropriated in FY 2009.
Moved 2012 to 2013.
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Moved 2013 to 2014. Directed
adjustment for inflation assumptions.
0
4,543 Increased cost.
746 Moved 2014 to 2013; Increased cost.
0
(18,000) Moved 2013 to 2012. Range program
cost adjustment.
(25,000) Moved 2013 to 2014. Funding for project
420364 was transferred to related project
420051 because of cost increases in
420051. Currently the ARNG intends to
fund 420364 in a future year. Exchange
of funding was requested by PA TAG.
Mod For
Mod For
Mod For
Mod For
Mod For
Military Construction Army National Guard, Future Years Defense Program
FY 2011- FY 2015
Fiscal
Year
2013
State
Town or Installation
PA Fort Indiantown Gap
2013
PA
Fort Indiantown Gap
2013
PA
Fort Indiantown Gap
2013
2013
2013
PR
PR
PR
San Juan
Camp Santiago
Camp Santiago
2013
PR
Camp Santiago
2013
2013
PR
PR
Camp Santiago
Camp Santiago
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
SC
SC
SD
TX
UT
2013
2013
2013
2013
Facility
Category
721
Project Title
EAATS Lodging Complex
Prior FYDP
PB09
0
15,158
Change
Explanation
(15,158) Moved 2013 to 2014. Funding for project
420364 was transferred to related project
420051 because of cost increases in
420051. Currently the ARNG intends to
fund 420364 in a future year. Exchange
of funding was requested by PA TAG.
Proj No
420364
MDEP
E3H6
Pgm
Revit
178
8,000
10,000
(2,000) Range program cost adjustment.
420372
VSRM
Range
178
2,300
2,500
(200) Range program cost adjustment.
420504
VSRM
Range
171
178
178
15,000
0
0
15,000
2,000
2,500
430081
430023
436020
ERVT Mod For
VSRM Range
VSRM Range
178
0
1,582
436021
VSRM
Range
Infantry Squad Battle Course
Live Fire Shoot House
178
178
0
0
2,500
2,000
436022
436023
VSRM
VSRM
Range
Range
Greenville
Florence
Rapid City
Fort Worth
Camp Williams
Field Maintenance Shop
Field Maintenance Shop Ph2
Barracks (ORTC) Ph1
Readiness Center
BEQ Facility (Regional Training Institute)
214
214
721
171
721
12,839
12,764
0
12,633
15,345
12,839
0
12,124
0
15,345
450131
450424
460132
480243
490076
EAMF
EAMF
E3H9
ERVT
E3H6
Mod For
Mod For
Revit
Revit
Mod For
UT
VT
VA
WA
Camp Williams
Morrisville
Sandston
Fort Lewis
Regional Training Institute Ph2
Field Maintenance Shop
Readiness Center (JFHQ)
Readiness Center
721
214
171
171
23,683
0
0
35,000
23,683
4,324
18,290
37,655
490444
500036
510065
530015
E3H6
ERVT
ERVT
EAMF
Revit
Mod For
Mod For
Mod For
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
2013
WA
WV
WI
WI
WY
WY
WY
ZZZ
ZZZ
Spokane
Martinsburg
Wausau
Portage
Camp Guernsey
Cheyenne
Camp Guernsey
Various
Various
Limited Army Aviation Support Facility
Armed Forces Reserve Center
Field Maintenance Shop
Readiness Center Add/Alt
Urban Assault Course
Readiness Center
Live Fire Shoot House
Unspecified Minor Construction
Planning and Design
Total FY 2013 Program Request
211
171
214
171
178
171
178
0
14,186
5,810
5,500
3,000
8,904
3,100
12,000
11,383
712,962
18,581
14,186
0
5,162
2,000
0
2,000
12,000
6,001
808,192
530030
540071
550142
550161
560047
560702
560996
990022
990033
EAMF Mod For
ERVT Mod For
ERVT
Revit
ERVT Mod For
VSRM Range
ERVT
Revit
VSRM Range
E315
E314
2014
2014
2014
AR Searcy
Field Maintenance Shop
214
7,000
0
2014
050139
AA
EAFS
AA
Revit
Scout RECCE w/Infantry Squad Battle
Course
Multipurpose Machine Gun Range
178
21,000
0
050182
VSRM
Range
178
7,400
0
040221
VSRM
Range
2014
AR
Fort Chaffee
2014
AZ
Camp Navajo
Upgrade:Combined Arms Collective
Training Facility
Combat Pistol/Military Pistol Qualification
Course
Readiness Center (JFHQ)
Range MOUT Assault Course
Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point
Range
Multipurpose Machine Gun Range
(MPMG)
Budgeted
Amount
2014
2014
0
(2,000) Range program project cancellation.
(2,500) Range program project cancellation.
(1,582) Moved 2013 to 2011. Range program
cost adjustment. Project related to Grow
the Army.
(2,500) Range program project cancellation.
(2,000) Moved 2013 to 2011. Range program
cost adjustment. Project related to Grow
the Army.
0
12,764 Moved 2012 to 2013.
(12,124) Project was appropriated in FY 2009.
12,633 Moved 2012 to 2013.
0
0
(4,324) Moved 2013 to 2014. Cost adjustment.
(18,290) Moved 2013 to 2014. Increased cost.
(2,655) Directed adjustment for inflation
assumptions.
(18,581) Moved 2013 to 2014.
0
5,810 Moved 2012 to 2013.
338 Increased cost for rounding
1,000 Range program cost adjustment
8,904 Moved 2012 to 2013.
1,100 Range program cost adjustment
0
5,382
(95,230)
0
7,000 Restored Project, was last in FY09 FYDP
21,000 Range program insertion.
7,400 Range program Grow the Army program
insertion
Military Construction Army National Guard, Future Years Defense Program
FY 2011- FY 2015
Fiscal
Year
2014
2014
2014
2014
State
DE
FL
FL
ID
2014
IA
2014
2014
ME
MD
Facility
Town or Installation
Project Title
Category
Seaford
Readiness Center
171
Eglin AFB
Readiness Center
171
Camp Blanding
Multipurpose Training Range (MPTR)
178
Orchard Range Training Site, BoiseUpgrade:Multipurpose Range
178
Complex(MPRC-Range1)
Camp Dodge
Combined Arms Collective Training
179
Facility
Augusta
Armed Forces Reserve Center
171
Reisterstown
United States Property and Fiscal Office
442
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
MA
MI
MI
MN
MS
MT
MT
Camp Edwards
Camp Grayling
Camp Custer
Stillwater
Pascagoula
Miles City
Helena
Regional Training Institute
Barracks Replacement (ORTC) Ph2
Light Demolition Range
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readiness Center Add/Alt
2014
2014
2014
NJ
NM
NY
Sea Girt
Socorro
Camp Smith
2014
PA
2014
Budgeted Prior FYDP
Amount
PB09
7,058
0
5,528
0
18,000
0
20,000
0
Change
7,058
5,528
18,000
20,000
Explanation
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Range program insertion.
Moved 2012 to 2014. Range program
cost adjustment.
5,700 Range program insertion.
Proj No
100049
120176
120214
160170
MDEP
Pgm
ERVT Mod For
ERVT Mod For
VSRM Range
VSRM Range
190134
VSRM
Range
5,700
0
22,804
11,166
0
0
22,804 Moved 2013 to 2014.
11,166 Moved 2013 to 2014.
230113
240028
ERVT
ERVT
Mod For
Mod For
171
721
178
171
171
171
171
18,962
17,000
1,600
14,136
4,500
11,000
38,000
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18,962
17,000
1,600
14,136
4,500
11,000
38,000
250095
260051
260216
270014
280272
300032
300128
ERVT
E3H9
VSRM
EAMF
EAMF
EAMF
EAMF
Mod For
Revit
Range
Mod For
Mod For
Mod For
Mod For
Regional Training Institute Ph2
Readiness Center Add/Alt
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
171
171
214
15,396
4,775
31,000
0
0
0
15,396
4,775
31,000
340112
350029
360139
ERVT
ERVT
EAMF
Mod For
Mod For
Mod For
Fort Indiantown Gap
EAATS Aviation Training and
Maintenance Facility
171
40,158
0
40,158
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Moved 2013 to 2014. Increased cost.
Range program project insertion.
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Moved 2013 to 2014. Increased cost.
Moved 2013 to 2014. Increased cost.
Includes a $2.000M directed reduction for
inflation assumptions.
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Moved 2013 to 2014.
Moved 2013 to 2014. Directed
adjustment for inflation assumptions.
Moved 2013 to 2014. Funding for project
420364 was transferred to related project
420051 because of cost increases in
420051. Currently the ARNG intends to
fund 420364 in a future year. Exchange
of funding was requested by PA TAG.
420051
ERVT
Mod For
PA
Fort Indiantown Gap
EAATS Lodging Complex
721
0
0
0 Moved 2013 to 2014. Funding for project
420364 was transferred to related project
420051 because of cost increases in
420051. Currently the ARNG intends to
fund 420364 in a future year. Exchange
of funding was requested by PA TAG.
420364
E3H6
Revit
2014
2014
PA
SC
Fort Indiantown Gap
Camp McCrady
Heavy Sniper Range
10/25M Range
178
178
4,300
1,900
0
0
420505
450462
VSRM
VSRM
Range
Range
2014
2014
2014
2014
2014
VT
VA
WA
ZZZ
ZZZ
Morrisville
Sandston
Spokane
Various
Various
Field Maintenance Shop
Readiness Center (JFHQ)
Limited Army Aviation Support Facility
Unspecified Minor Construction
Planning and Design
Total FY 2014 Program Request
214
171
211
4,397
27,000
18,581
12,759
22,405
413,525
0
0
0
0
0
0
500036
510065
530030
990022
990033
ERVT
ERVT
EAMF
E315
E314
Mod For
Mod For
Mod For
2015
2015
2015
AK Camp Denali
610
27,000
0
2015
020143
AA
ERVT
AA
Revit
2015
2015
United States Property and Fiscal Office
Facility
4,300 Range program insertion.
1,900 Range program Grow the Army program
insertion
4,397 Moved 2013 to 2014. Cost adjustment.
27,000 Moved 2013 to 2014. Increased cost.
18,581 Moved 2013 to 2014.
12,759
22,405
413,525
0
27,000 Restored project, was last in FY06 FYDP.
Includes a $1.850M directed reduction for
inflation assumptions.
Military Construction Army National Guard, Future Years Defense Program
FY 2011- FY 2015
Fiscal
Year
2015
State
Town or Installation
AZ Mojave County
Project Title
Readiness Center
Facility
Category
171
Budgeted Prior FYDP
Amount
PB09
13,000
0
Change
Explanation
13,000 Restored project, was last in FY06 FYDP
Proj No
040035
MDEP
EAFS
Pgm
Revit
2015
2015
2015
AZ
CA
CO
Camp Navajo
Camp Roberts
Fort Carson
Infantry Squad Battle Course
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
Readiness Center
178
178
171
3,000
9,000
16,565
0
0
0
3,000 Range program insertion.
9,000 Range program project insertion
16,565 Restored project, was last in FY06 FYDP
40250
060441
080115
VSRM
VSRM
EAFS
Range
Range
Revit
2015
FL
Camp Blanding
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
178
8,100
0
120213
VSRM
Range
2015
2015
2015
IL
IN
KS
Marseilles
Camp Atterbury
Kansas City
Urban Assault Course
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
Readiness Center
178
178
171
3,500
4,000
33,000
0
0
0
170909
180162
200101
VSRM Range
VSRM Range
EAMF Mod For
2015
2015
2015
LA
MD
MS
Camp Minden
Easton
Camp Shelby
Modified Record Fire Range
Readiness Center
Simulation Center
178
171
172
4,500
13,796
16,985
0
0
0
8,100 Moved 2012 to 2015. Range program
cost adjustment.
3,500 Range program project insertion
4,000 Range program project insertion
33,000 Moved 2013 to 2015. Includes a
$1.000M directed reduction for inflation
assumptions.
4,500 Range program cost adjustment
13,796 Moved 2013 to 2015. Cost increase.
16,985 Restored project, was last in FY07 FYDP
220199
240173
280230
VSRM Range
EAMF Mod For
EAFS
Revit
2015
MO
Jefferson Barracks
Field Maintenance Shop
214
9,074
0
9,074 Restored project, was last in FY06 FYDP
290191
ERVT
Revit
2015
NH
Manchester
Field Maintenance Shop
214
20,400
0
20,400 Restored project, was last in FY06 FYDP
330019
EAFS
Revit
2015
ND
Valley City
Field Maintenance Shop
214
10,746
0
10,746 Restored project, was last in FY06 FYDP
380073
EAFS
Revit
2015
2015
2015
2015
OH
OH
OR
OR
Ravenna
Ravenna
Boardman
Salem
178
178
178
171
3,500
6,000
10,000
15,000
0
0
0
0
3,500 Range program project insertion
6,000 Range program project insertion
10,000
15,000 Restored project, was last in FY06 FYDP
390278
390281
410133
410301
VSRM
VSRM
VSRM
ERVT
Range
Range
Range
Revit
2015
PR
Salinas
218
5,560
0
5,560 Restored project, was last in FY06 FYDP
430070
ERVT
Revit
2015
RI
North Smithfield
Combat Pistol Qualification Course
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
Armed Forces Reserve Center Add/Alt
(JFHQ)
Maneuver Area Training & Equipment
Site Addition
Readiness Center
171
12,924
0
12,924 Restored project, was last in FY06 FYDP
440040
EAFS
Revit
2015
SC
Camp McCrady
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
178
4,500
0
450377
VSRM
Range
2015
2015
2015
TX
TX
WY
South Texas
Camp Swift
Camp Guernsey
Land Acquisition
Live Fire Exercise Breach
Regional Training Institute Ph1
178
178
171
40,000
900
31,000
0
0
0
480289
480903
560060
VSRM
VSRM
E3H6
Range
Range
Revit
2015
2015
ZZZ
ZZZ
Various
Various
Unspecified Minor Construction
Planning and Design
Total FY 2015 Program Request
9,314
22,804
354,168
0
0
0
4,500 Range program Grow the Army program
insertion
40,000 Range program project insertion
900 Range program project insertion
31,000 Restored project, was last in FY06 FYDP.
Includes a $0.716M directed reduction for
inflation assumptions.
9,314
22,804
354,168
990022
990033
E315
E314
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Florence Military Reservation
INSNO= 04989
COST INDEX
Florence, Arizona
.96
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Reservists - 1 weekend/month - 1 night/week Full-time personnel - 5 days a week.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Mesa, AZ
13.00 miles Armory
2,157 m2 (23,221 SF)
1954
ARNG
Tempe, AZ
17.00 miles Armory
926 m2 (9,964 SF)
1954
ARNG
Chandler, AZ
8.00 miles Armory
1,603 m2 (17,250 SF)
1988
ARNG
Rittenhouse, AZ
15.00 miles Trn Site
1,603 m2 (17,250 SF)
1988
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 Readiness Center
7,765 m2
(83,581 SF)
16,500 OCT 2008 JUL 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
14
JAN 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 07 MAR 2005
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
24
24
0
0
24
24
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
418
418
16
16
402
402
PAGE NO.
1
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Florence Military Reservation
Florence, Arizona
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
B COMPANY 1-158TH INFANTRY
258TH ENGINEER COMPANY
29TH SUPPORT BATTALION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 04989
UIC
______
WP80B0
WQQDAA
WYC7AA
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
07417G000
63337G700
63337G700
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
131
131
160
160
127 _______
127
_______
418
418
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
AUTHORIZED
__________
0
47
4
18
__________
ACTUAL
______
112
47
4
18
__________
TOTALS
69
181
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
2
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Florence Military Reservation
Florence, Arizona
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Readiness Center
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
040023
16,500
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center
Energy Management Control Syste
Building Information Systems
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
Building Information Systems
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp( 1,106) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
7,765 (
-------------
UNIT COST
83,581)
1,539
-------------
COST ($000)
13,058
(11,952)
(200)
(250)
(270)
(267)
(119)
1,814
(1)
(79)
(448)
(116)
(1,106)
(42)
(22)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
14,872
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
744
_________
SUBTOTAL
15,616
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (2.99%)
467
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
625
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
16,708
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
16,500
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $700 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed Readiness Center of
permanent masonry type construction, with standing seam metal roof, concrete
floors and mechanical and electrical equipment with emergency power generator
backup. Supporting facilities will include maintenance, military vehicle
parking and access roads and POV parking, security fencing and dark motor pool
lighting, flammable materials storage building, controlled waste handling
facility, and sidewalks. Extension of gas, electric, sewer, water and
communication utilities to the building will be necessary. Actual foundation
design will be determined during design. Physical security measures will be
incorporated into design including maximum feasible standoff distance from
roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas; berms, heavy landscaping,
and bollards will be provided to prevent access when standoff distance cannot
be maintained. Cost effective energy conserving features will be incorporated
into design and standard HVAC/MEP systems will be incorporated into design and
standard HVAC/MEP systems commissioning will be included. The force main would
require approximately 500 feet more than the 300 feet allotted by the 415-12
outside the site perimeter. Air conditioning: 75 tons.
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
3
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Florence Military Reservation
Florence, Arizona
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
040023
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
7,765 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
1,858 m2
________
PROJECT: This project is to provide a Readiness Center, of permanent type
________
construction, to serve the peace time missions of the assigned unit. The space
will permit all personnel to perform the necessary tasks that will improve the
unit s readiness posture. The proposed site for this project is on state
acquired land. As an interim solution to this project a temporary facility has
been leased.
(Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The facility is required to house "B" Company 158th Infantry,
____________
29th Support Battalion and the 258th Engineers. These units have an authorized
strength of 131 personnel, 127 personnel, and 215 personnel respectively. This
new readiness center will provide the necessary administrative, supply,
classroom, locker, showers and rest room, maintenance bays,
classroom/training, and kitchen/dining areas required to train and support
assigned personnel. A ten acre site is proposed for this project.
CURRENT SITUATION:
"B" Company 158th Infantry is presently located in a
__________________
leased building in Gilbert, AZ. This facility has approximately 1/3 the size
authorized (approximately 10,000 Square Feet) and is located in an industrial
park. This facility was not designed to accommodate the 131 personnel assigned
and does not provide adequate space for the unit. The facility is used to the
maximum extent possible resulting in extensive overcrowding in substandard
facilities. The existing organizational parking area is limited to a
unimproved parking area and there is limited number of existing designated POV
parking spaces (approximately 30); personnel park in various spaces on the
adjacent property or in the street. With the construction of a new Readiness
Center, the presently occupied facility will be vacated and the lease
terminated. Existing facilities do not meet present AT/FP requirements.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
If this project is not approved, the units’ ability
_______________________
to meet its readiness, recruiting, retention, and training objectives will
continue to be adversely affected if the personnel are not provided with a
facility large enough for training and organizational operations. Delays in
the funding of this project will force the continued use of a crowded facility
which will continue to negatively impact troop readiness and morale. The lack
of proper and acceptable levels of training and sufficient storage and
administrative areas will continue to impair the attainment of required
mobilization readiness levels.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
PAGE NO. 4
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Florence Military Reservation
Florence, Arizona
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
040023
ADDITIONAL:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
OCT 2008
_________
60
_________
_________
100
_________
JUN 2009
_________
JUL 2010
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
OCT 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
DEC 2012
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
_________
603
_________
603
_________
603
_________
_________
PAGE NO. 5
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Florence Military Reservation
Florence, Arizona
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
040023
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (CONTINUED)
_______________________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: LTC Steven L. Smith
Phone Number: 602 267-2771
PAGE NO. 6
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Cente
INSNO= 05401
COST INDEX
Fort Smith, Arkansas
.92
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARMY
BARLING, AR
2.00 miles MILES
1,603
(17,250 )
1989
ARNG
FT. SMITH, AR
8.00 miles MILES
1,603
(17,250 )
1976
ARNG
VAN BUREN, AR
10.00 miles MILES
1,603
(17,250 )
1958
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17879 Live Fire Shoot House
451 m2
(4,850 SF)
2,500 SEP 2007 JUL 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
08 SEP 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 13 NOV 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
0
12
0
0
0
12
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
531
509
176
99
355
410
PAGE NO. 7
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Cente
Fort Smith, Arkansas
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
TRP TROOP CMD
U UNIT MARKSMANSHIP
CTR ARNG MNV TNG CTR
HHB, FIB
HHC HEADQUARTERS, INF
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 05401
UIC
______
W782AA
W7L0AA
W8GWAA
WP2RAA
WQNUAA
TSPN
____
46761
46753
66755
20642
13039
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
38
40
55
45
165
177
131
111
142 _______
136
_______
531
509
Assigned/Authorized: 95%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
AUTHORIZED
__________
100
46
9
2
__________
ACTUAL
______
100
46
9
2
__________
TOTALS
157
157
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
8
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Center
Fort Smith, Arkansas
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
Live Fire Shoothouse
7.PROJECT NUMBER
178
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
050173
2,500
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Live Fire Shoothouse
After Action Review Facility
AMMO Breakdown
Target Opeations & Storage
Latrine
SDD and EPAct05
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
232.26
111.48
13.94
18.58
74.32
(
(
(
(
(
------
UNIT COST
2,500)
1,200)
150)
200)
800)
COST ($000)
3,498
2,799
2,690
3,498
1,776
------
1,387
(813)
(312)
(38)
(65)
(132)
(27)
923
(330)
(300)
(52)
(241)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
2,310
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
116
_________
SUBTOTAL
2,426
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
73
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
2,499
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
2,500
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Construct a Live Fire Shoot House consisting of
the shoot house itself plus supporting structures including a Range
Operations/Storage Building, Latrine, After Action Review Facility, service
roads, site improvements and associated range power and data transfer cabling.
Other supporting facilities include electric service, telephone, and
information systems. Surface clearance will be performed prior to construction
start. This project supports the MILCON Pillar of Training
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: A Live Fire Shoot House (LFSH) for support of training requirements
________
of the Arkansas Army National Guard. (Current Misison) (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The LFSH will train and test individuals, teams, sections and
____________
squads on the skills necessary to conduct indiviual and collective tasks of
building clearing/occupying. All targets are fully automated, and the
event-specific target scenario will be computer driven and scored from the
range operations center. This range will be constructed on Federal land.
CURRENT SITUATION:
There are no Live Fire Shoot Houses within reasonable
__________________
travel distance limit specified in NGB/FORSCOM Reg 350-2 that meet IBCT
training requirements. Currently no ranges exist in Arkansas that provide the
realism in training required to meet combat training objectives.
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
9
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Cente
Fort Smith, Arkansas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Live Fire Shoothouse
050173
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
If this project is not provided, it will be
_______________________
impossible for assigned units to acquire and maintain the proficiency required
for combat units in an increasingly urban environment. This proficiency can
only result from realistic training under simulated combat training. Traveling
to an alternate facility will result in increased cost and loss of valuable
collective training time normally reserved for annual training. Overall
readiness will be degraded regardless of the alternative used.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. An economic analysis has been
prepared and utilized in evaluating this project. This project is the most
cost-effective method to satisfy the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. Mission requirements, operational
considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other components.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
SEP 2007
_________
65
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
JUL 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
PAGE NO. 10
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
($000)
_________
166
_________
166
_________
55
_________
111
_________
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Cente
Fort Smith, Arkansas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Live Fire Shoothouse
050173
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name:
Phone Number:
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 11
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Cente
INSNO= 05401
COST INDEX
Fort Smith, Arkansas
.92
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
BARLING, AR
2.00 miles RESERVE CENTER
1,603
(17,250 )
1989
FT. SMITH, AR
8.00 miles READINESS CENTER
1,603
(17,250 )
1976
VAN BUREN, AR
10.00 miles READINESS CENTER
1,603
(17,250 )
1958
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17901 COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAI
1 LN
(1 LN)
19,000 OCT 2007 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
12 OCT 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
214
178
178
178
214
178
CSMS
Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point
LIVE Fire Shoot House
Multi-Purpose Training Range
FMS
Infantry Squad Batttle Course
31,400
2,450
3,000
30,000
6,188
4,000
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 21 JUL 2007
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
PAGE NO. 12
284
103
10
9
56
24
218
70
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
220
195
39
28
DD
FORM
MAY 78
181
167
1390s1
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Cente
Fort Smith, Arkansas
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 05401
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
ARNG MANEUVER TRAINING CENTER
NG MARKSMANSHIP TRAINING UNIT
87TH TROOP COMMAND & SUBORDINATE UNITS
142 FA BDE: HHB, 1-142, 2-142 FA BNS
39TH INFANTRY BRIGADE (ENHANCED)
UIC
______
W8GWAA
W7L0AA
W782AA
WP2RAA
WQNUAA
TSPN
____
46551
46761
46761
20603
13039
MTOE/TDA
________
NGW8GWAA
NGW7L0AA
NGW782AA
06402L
07402L
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
165
145
55
50
2,653
2,547
1,196
1,182
3,831 _______
3,541
_______
7,900
7,465
Assigned/Authorized: 94%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
AUTHORIZED
__________
21
4
6
1
__________
ACTUAL
______
21
4
6
1
__________
TOTALS
32
32
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
PAGE NO.
13
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Center
Fort Smith, Arkansas
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
Combined Arms Collective Training Fac
7.PROJECT NUMBER
179
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
050163
19,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Muicipal Building (3Story, w/ba
Office Building (2 story)
Police Station (1 story w/base)
Business (1 story)
Residential
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
2) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
1,035
409.05
401.25
107.02
196.95
(
(
(
(
(
-------
UNIT COST
11,145)
4,403)
4,319)
1,152)
2,120)
2,153
2,153
2,153
2,153
2,153
-------
COST ($000)
15,704
(2,229)
(881)
(864)
(230)
(424)
(11,076)
2,034
(122)
(200)
(66)
(2)
(130)
(1,514)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
17,738
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
887
_________
SUBTOTAL
18,625
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
559
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
19,184
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
19,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(5,600)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,100 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. Construct a Combined Arms Collective Training
Facility (CACTF) consisting of structures and mock utilities to simulate an
urban setting. Primary Facilities are located within the perimeter of the
range complex and include structures simulating an urban setting (School,
Church/cemetery, Police station/Jail, Hotel, Residences, Businesses,
Townhouse, Bank, Warehouses, Government Building, Office, Service Station),
Range Operations Center, Target Operations/Storage Building, Latrine, After
Action Review Facility, service roads, site improvements and associated range
power and data transfer cabling. Supporting facilities include electric
service, telephone, and information systems. Surface clearance will be
performed prior to construction start.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
1 LN ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: A 1-Lane Combined Arms Collective Training Facility Site for support
________
of training requirements of the Infantry Brigade Combat Team (IBCT). (Current
Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The CACTF is required to provide facilities for training
____________
National Guard Units in tactics and techniques required for CACTF operations
under simulated combat conditions. This project is necessary for individual
PAGE NO.
14
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Cente
Fort Smith, Arkansas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Arms Collective Training Facility
050163
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
Hotel (3 story1/2 base)
School (2 story)
Townhouse-4 unit (2 Story)
Warehouse/Market
Service Station
Bank
Church/Cemetery
Soccer Field
Tunnel/Sewer System
Streets. Parking & Turn pads
Downrange Electrical
Downrange Data Cabling
Site Preparation
P/A System
Helipad
Power Station
Train Station
Overhead Powerlines (Simulation
Farm Barn
Overpass (Pedestrian)
Sports Lighting
Overpas (Vehicular(
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
m
m2
m
m
ha
LS
LS
m2
m2
LS
m2
LS
LS
LS
Unit
COST
QUANTITY
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
863.53
772.95
594.58
377.28
154.59
107.02
377.37
(LF)
(SY)
(LF)
(LF)
(AC)
60.96
14,779
1,297
1,297
5.83
(SF)
(SF)
154.59
107.02
(SF)
107.02
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
-(
(
(
(
(
--(
(
-(
----
9,295)
8,320)
6,400)
4,061)
1,664)
1,152)
4,062)
200)
17,675)
4,255)
4,255)
14.40)
1,664)
1,152)
1,152)
Cost
($000)
2,153
(1,859)
2,153
(1,664)
2,153
(1,280)
1,668
(629)
1,991
(308)
2,153
(230)
2,422
(914)
-(150)
1,952
(119)
101.66
(1,502)
278.87
(362)
164.04
(213)
22,230
(130)
-(225)
-(25)
1,399
(216)
2,153
(230)
-(150)
1,884
(202)
-(200)
-(300)
-(168)
_________
Total
11,076
REQUIREMENT:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
and small unit training, since CACTF operations are characterized by
independent action of small units to accomplish a combined arms clearance of
assigned zones in urban areas. This facility will be constructed on State land
in the 14th year of an indefinite year lease to the Federal Government.
CURRENT SITUATION:
There are no facilities on this installation for troops
__________________
to acquire and maintain the proficiency required in MOUT operations within 2
hours travel distance (limit specified in NGB/FORSCOM Reg 350-2) that meet
SBCT training requirements. The nearest CACTF facility that meets current
requirements in located on Fort Campbell which is 511 miles from Fort Chaffee.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
If this project is not provided, it will be
_______________________
impossible for assigned units to acquire and maintain the proficiency required
for combat units in an increasingly urban environment. This proficiency can
only result from realistic training under simulated combat training. The only
alternative (traveling to Fort Campbell) will result in increased cost and
loss of valuable collective training time normally reserved for annual
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 15
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Cente
Fort Smith, Arkansas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Arms Collective Training Facility
050163
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
(CONTINUED)
______________________________________
training. Overall readiness will be degraded regardless of the alternative
used.
ADDITIONAL: ADDITIONAL: Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have
___________
been explored during project development. This project is the only feasible
option to meet this requirement. Sustainable principles will be integrated
into the design, development, and construction of the project in accordance
with Executive order 13123 and other applicable laws. JOINT USE CERTIFICATION:
The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing)
certifies that this project has been considered for joint use potential. This
facility will be available for use by other components. ANTITERRIORISM/FORCE
PROTECTION: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
security plan. All required physical security measures and all
anti-terrorism/force protection measures are included.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
OCT 2007
_________
35
_________
65
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
MAR 2012
PAGE NO. 16
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
($000)
15
_________
1,772
_________
1,787
_________
957
_________
830
_________
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Fort Chaffee Maneuver Training Cente
Fort Smith, Arkansas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Arms Collective Training Facility
050163
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
TARGETRY
OPA
2011
TOTAL
5,600
______
5,600
CFMO Name: LTC Robert Embrey
Phone Number: (501)-212-5850
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 17
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 18
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Camp Joseph T Robinson
INSNO= 05C55
COST INDEX
North Little Rock, Arkansas
.92
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, plus drill training and maintenance one to two times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
RTMA Camp Robinson,
1.00 miles ARTI Troop Complex
9,555 m2 (102,848 SF)
1979
ARNG
RTMA Camp Robinson,
1.00 miles Readiness Center
2,154 m2 (23,181 SF)
1979
ARNG
RTMA Camp Robinson,
1.00 miles Readiness Center
1,951 m2 (21,000 SF)
1941
USAR
North Little Rock,
5.00 miles Reserve Center
11,917 m2 (128,276 SF)
1979
ARNG
North Little Rock,
5.00 miles Readiness Center
3,716 m2 (39,994 SF)
1959
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
21407 Combined Support Maintenance
SCOPE
_____
11,405 m2
(122,759 SF)
($000)
______
30,000
START
CMPL
_____
____
MAR 2006 JUN 2008
0
(0 )
0
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
12 AUG 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
179
178
178
178
214
178
CACTF
Convoy Live Fire/Entry Control Point
LIVE Fire Shoot House
Multi-Purpose Training Range
FMS
Infantry Squad Batttle Course
20,100
2,450
3,000
30,000
6,188
4,000
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF N/A
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1,212
1,172
1390s1
141
136
1,071
1,036
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
8,240
7,904
946
812
7,294
7,092
PAGE NO. 19
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Joseph T Robinson
North Little Rock, Arkansas
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
ALL ARAR
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 05C55
UIC
______
WQC598
TSPN
____
31137
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
8,240 _______
7,904
_______
8,240
7,904
Assigned/Authorized: 95%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
25
20
16
12
2
5
__________
ACTUAL
______
3,307
1,306
170
119
184
58
__________
TOTALS
80
5,144
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
20
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Camp Joseph T Robinson
North Little Rock, Arkansas
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
214
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
050043
30,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Combined Support Maintenance Sh
Flammable Materials Facility
Controlled Waste Faility
Unheated Metal Storage Building
Energy Management Control Syste
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Steam And/Or Chilled Water Dist
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp( 1,600) Demo(
)
Information Systems
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
10,819
46.45
27.87
510.97
UNIT COST
( 116,459)
(
500)
(
300)
(
5,500)
--
1,647
1,292
1,076
1,076
--
---------
---------
COST ($000)
19,785
(17,818)
(60)
(30)
(550)
(597)
(730)
8,325
(200)
(200)
(200)
(4,191)
(1,600)
(1,182)
(514)
(238)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
28,110
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,406
_________
SUBTOTAL
29,516
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
885
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
30,401
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
30,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,400 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed CSMS facility of
permanent masonry type construction, with sloped standing seam roof, concrete
floors and energy efficient mechanical and electrical equipment with emergency
power generator backup. Supporting facilities will include weapons cleaning,
maintenance issue, turn-in sheds, military vehicle parking and access roads
and POV parking, security fencing and dark motor pool lighting, vehicle wash
system and pump house, loading ramp, flammable materials storage building,
controlled waste handling facility, and sidewalks. Extension of gas ,
electric, sewer, water and communication utilities on Camp Robinson to the
building site will be necessary. Actual foundation design will be determined
during design. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design
including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and
vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent
access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy. AIR
CONDITIONING-38.77 TON
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: Construct a new CSMS facility and the infrastructure to support this
________
facility as stated above. Location is on a 40 acre, Federally licensed, ARARNG
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
21
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Joseph T Robinson
North Little Rock, Arkansas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
050043
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
LS
QUANTITY
---
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
--Total
(365)
(365)
_________
730
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
training site on Camp Robinson.
(Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The facility is required to maintain equipment and
____________
issue/turn-in for peacetime training and ensure the equipment is prepared for
mobilization. The CSMS is an ARNG TDA maintenance facility which provides
full-time DS and GS level support to all ARARNG units. No other adequate
facilities are available to support the units. The 1998 ARARNG Master Plan has
evaluated and recommended that the CSMS should be located at Camp Robinson.
The new facility will be constructed on approximately 40 acres of the 32,000
acre training site located on Federal land.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing Combined Support Maintenance Shop, built in
__________________
1955, has only 60,150 SF of functional space. The shop is a concrete block
building and is completely inadequate to support the quantity and type
vehicles currently assigned to the ARARNG. The work bays are not large enough
to support track vehicles and the administration, supply and latrine space is
critically deficient.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
If the project is not approved, the present
_______________________
facility’s lack of adequate space will reduce maintenance efficiency, training
and mobilization readiness standards will continue to decline. The building
may become severely damaged due to improper drainage and expansive soil
causing a complete replacement. Lack of adequate military vehicle parking will
cause environmental damage, decrease efficiency, and create work
backlog.
ADDITIONAL: ADDITIONAL: Alternative methods of meeting the requirement have
___________
been explored during project development. This project is the only feasible
option to meet this requirement. Sustainable principles will be integrated
into the design, development, and construction of the project in accordance
with Executive Order 13123 and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION: The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Installations and Housing) certifies that this project has been considered
for joint use potential. This facility will be available for use by other
components. ANTITERRORISM/FORCE PROTECTION: This project has been coordinated
with the installation physical security plan. All required physical security
and anti-terrorism/force protection measures are included.
PAGE NO. 22
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Joseph T Robinson
North Little Rock, Arkansas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
050043
ADDITIONAL:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract:
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
MAR 2006
_________
80
_________
_________
_________
AUG 2008
_________
OCT 2008
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
NOV 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
MAR 2011
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
_________
2,460
_________
2,460
_________
1,640
_________
820
_________
PAGE NO. 23
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Joseph T Robinson
North Little Rock, Arkansas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
050043
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (CONTINUED)
_______________________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: LTC Robert Embrey
Phone Number: (501)-212-5850
PAGE NO. 24
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Camp Roberts Maneuver Training Cente
INSNO= 06740
COST INDEX
San Miguel, California
1.16
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
NORMAL ADMINISTRATION FIVE DAYS PER WEEK, A TWO-DAY TRAINING ASSEMBLY TWO OR THREE TIMES PER MONTH, PLUS 6
TO 8 FIFTEEN DAY TRAINING PERIODS DURING THE YEAR.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Atascadero,
23.00 miles READINESS CENTER
3,716
(39,994 )
ARNG
Camp San Luis Obisp
45.00 miles STATE T.S.
3,716
(39,994 )
USAR
Fort Hunter Liggett
40.00 miles ARMY INSTALLATION
3,716
(39,994 )
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17901 Combined Arms Collective Trai
3,206 m2
(34,513 SF)
19,000 OCT 2008 JUL 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
01
OCT 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
83210
214
178
Camp Roberts Utility Replacement
FMS
Multi-Purpose Range
25,000
8,000
30,000
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 11 DEC 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
18,544
16,003
1390s1
1,677
1,923
16,867
14,080
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
18,544
16,003
1,677
1,923
16,867
14,080
PAGE NO. 25
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Roberts Maneuver Training Cente
San Miguel, California
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
ALL CALIFORNIA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD UNITS
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 06740
UIC
______
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
18,544 _______
16,003
_______
18,544 16,003
Assigned/Authorized: 86%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
1,138
302
430
170
40
58
__________
ACTUAL
______
1,158
298
422
169
40
57
__________
TOTALS
2,138
2,144
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
26
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Camp Roberts Maneuver Training Center-H
San Miguel, California
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FAC
7.PROJECT NUMBER
179
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
060429
19,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Building
Tunnel (42" RCP)
Wiring/Transite Duct (Power)
Data Cable/Junction Boxes
Power Centers/Transformers/Pane
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Storm Drainage
Site Imp(
257) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
m2 (SF)
m (LF)
LN
LN
LN
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
3,206
106.68
1
1
1
(
(
----
----
UNIT COST
34,513)
350)
4,364
600.39
258,300
462,900
222,500
----
COST ($000)
17,501
(13,993)
(64)
(258)
(463)
(223)
(2,500)
277
(10)
(257)
(10)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
17,778
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
889
_________
SUBTOTAL
18,667
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
560
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
19,227
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
19,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(6,310)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,200 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. Construct a standard Combined Arms Collective
Training Facility (CACTF) . Primary facilities include the CACTF, flag pole,
military equipment parking, range operation center, after action review
building, operations/storage building, latrine, and covered mess. Supporting
facilities include site preparation, fencing, grading, electric, storm
drainage and force protection.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
3,206 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: Construct a Combined Arms Collective Training Facility (CACTF).
________
(Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
This project is required to provide facilities for training
____________
units of the California Army National Guard, associated military entities, and
potentially civilian security agencies in tactics and techniques required for
urban operations under simulated combat conditions. As more of the world
mission becomes urban in nature, the need for members and units of the United
States Military to become proficient in urban military operations becomes
critical. A facility of this type is necessary for both individual and small
unit training, since urban operations are characterized by semi-independent
actions by small units to accomplish the methodical clearance of assigned
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
27
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Roberts Maneuver Training Cente
San Miguel, California
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY
060429
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
Power & Comm Trenching
LN
Rigid Paving
m2 (SY)
Access Roads
m2 (SY)
Range Operation Center
m2 (SF)
After Action Review Building La m2 (SF)
OPS/Storage Building
m2 (SF)
Covered Mess
m2 (SF)
Flag Pole
EA
Cemetery
LS
Unit
COST
QUANTITY
1
1,860
6,689
185.81
240.80
74.32
74.32
1
-(
(
(
(
(
(
---
2,225)
8,000)
2,000)
2,592)
800)
800)
Cost
($000)
324,800
(325)
94.48
(176)
69.37
(464)
2,960
(550)
2,207
(531)
2,390
(178)
1,292
(96)
2,000
(2)
-(178)
_________
Total
2,500
REQUIREMENT:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
zones.
CURRENT SITUATION:
At present, there are not any existing facilities in the
__________________
California National Guard for troops to acquire and maintain the proficiency
required in urban operations. With the greater need for exposure to urban
tactical training, units are in dire need of this type of facility. With the
continuing threat of urbanized combat this site will be a critical training
facility and will allow for a more controlled and realistic environment to
train military personnel for urban warfare.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The ability to meet readiness, combat preparedness
_______________________
and training objectives will continue to be adversely affected if personnel
are not provided with the proper facilities that are necessary. If this
project is not approved and funded for FY11, the soldiers and units deploying
will be unprepared for combat.
ADDITIONAL: ADDITIONAL: This project complies with the scope and design
___________
criteria of National Guard Pamphlet (Draft) 415-12 dated 30 April 2007, Design
Guide 415-4, and CEHNC 1110-1-23. The most similar DoD standards for range
design, costing, and construction do not address the current methodology
incorporated in the Army National Guard range designs and thus do not yield
accurate cost estimates. Therefore, State historical costs for design and
construction of like facilities were used to develop baseline unit cost and
were adjusted for size, fiscal year and location. An economic analysis has
been prepared and utilized in evaluating this project. Alternative methods of
meeting this requirement have been explored during project development. This
project is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. FINANCIAL
REGULATION: This project will have a parametric cost estimate by June 2008 in
accordance with the DoD Financial Management Regulation (June 2006) , Volume
2B, Chapter 6, Section 060301 (Military Construction) B.2. ANTI-TERRIORISM
PROTECTION: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
PAGE NO. 28
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Roberts Maneuver Training Cente
San Miguel, California
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY
060429
ADDITIONAL:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
security plan. All required physical security measures and all anti-terrorism
protection measures are included.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
OCT 2008
_________
35
_________
65
_________
100
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
NOV 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
JUN 2012
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
15
_________
1,668
_________
1,683
_________
1,122
_________
561
_________
PAGE NO. 29
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Roberts Maneuver Training Cente
San Miguel, California
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
COMBINED ARMS COLLECTIVE TRAINING FACILITY
060429
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (CONTINUED)
_______________________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
Instrumentation and Targetry
IT/TELECOM
OPA
OPA
2011
2012
TOTAL
4,060
2,250
______
6,310
CFMO Name: MAJ LORNEN DEAKIN
Phone Number: 916-854-3539
PAGE NO. 30
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Colorado ARNG
INSNO= COARNG
COST INDEX
Colorado
1.02
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Administration, Logistical and Operational activities for the conduct of numerous formal military
educational courses during inactive duty training and annual training periods, 132 days annually.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
USAR
Fort Carson, CO
1.00 miles Army 10th SF G (A)
13,332 m2 (143,500 SF)
1996
USAR
Fort Carson, CO
4.00 miles 300 P Reserve Cent
1,737 m2 (18,696 SF)
1987
USAR
Fort Carson, CO
4.00 miles 200P Reserve Cente
159 m2 (1,707 SF)
1986
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17120 Regional Training Institute
15,921 m2
(171,375 SF)
40,000 OCT 2009 OCT 2011
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
18
NOV 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
211
171
171
721
171
HAATS
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
ORTC Barrcks
Readiness Center
41,000
21,000
13,400
45,000
16,565
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 15 DEC 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
40
6
8
2
32
4
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
3,348
3,348
384
384
2,964
2,964
PAGE NO. 31
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Colorado ARNG
Colorado
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= COARNG
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
131 - TAITC
400-ANCOC
400-BNCOC
964-NPSPT
CLC
OCS
UIC
______
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
32
384
55
660
64
768
64
768
32
384
32 _______
384
_______
279
3,348
Assigned/Authorized: 200%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
AUTHORIZED
__________
7
9
__________
ACTUAL
______
7
9
__________
TOTALS
16
16
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
32
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Colorado ARNG
Colorado
Regional Trainign Institute (RTI),
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
080067
40,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Education Building
m2 (SF)
Student Billets
m2 (SF)
Energy Management Control Syste LS
SDD and EPAct05
LS
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
649) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
6,314 (
67,958)
9,608 ( 103,417)
----
-----
UNIT COST
2,153
2,153
----
COST ($000)
35,575
(13,592)
(20,683)
(500)
(400)
(400)
-----
1,832
(836)
(649)
(100)
(247)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
37,407
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,870
_________
SUBTOTAL
39,277
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
1,178
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
40,455
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
40,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $3,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed Regional Training
Institute (RTI) facility consisting of administration and education areas,
staff billets, student billets, a dining facility and ration breakdown to
serve the RTI and proposed in the Centennial Training Site Master Plan. The
facility will be constructed with permanent masonry type walls and sloped
standing metal seam roofs to conform with Fort Carson design guidelines,
concrete floors, designed for emergency power generator backup, energy
efficient mechanical and electrical equipment with automated HVAC, security
access and lighting controls. Typically, the majority of the site requires
pier and grade beam foundations. Actual foundation design will be determined
during design. Supporting facilities will include asphalt POV parking and
access roads, site utilities, concrete entrances, security lighting, and
sidewalks. Air conditioning: 559 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
15,927 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
7,526 m2
________
PROJECT: Phase II of the Centennial Training Site (CTS) Master Plan.
________
Construct a new RTI facility and the infrastructure (water, sewer, gas,
electric, communication and road network) consisting of administrative,
education, dining and billeting space with cost efficient mechanical and
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
33
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Colorado ARNG
Colorado
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Regional Trainign Institute (RTI),
080067
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
electrical equipment to effectively support military education courses and
training on this site. This is a year round military educational facility
which requires finishes IAW with DG 415-1. Location is on a 160 acre,
federally licensed, COARNG training site on Fort Carson. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
Phase II of the Centennial Training Site (CTS) Master Plan. The
____________
Colorado Army National Guard requires a self-contained, educational facility
with billets and dining facility to train and house a student load of 215
students. This educational facility requires adequate space to conduct Officer
Candidate School (OCS), Non-Commissioned Officer Enlisted (NCOES) schools,
Military Occupation Skill (MOS) courses, Battalion Staff and Commander
Courses, Company Commander Courses and 1st Sergeant Courses. No other adequate
facilities are available to support the units. The new facility will be
constructed on approximately 20 acres of the 160 acre training site located on
federal land. The 2004 COARNG Master Plan for the Centennial Training Site has
evaluated and recommended that the RTI should be collocated with the proposed
MATES and Battalion Training Complex.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The Colorado Army National Guard’s Regional Training
__________________
Institute continues to be moved from one temporary location to another. It
resided in World War II facilities that were on temporary license from Fort
Carson. Fort Carson is currently demolishing these facilities due to age and
condition. The RTI recently moved to an old military confinement facility and
certain renovations have been completed to minimally provide space. However,
this facility does not meet the quality or scope required for an RTI. This was
the best temporary facility Fort Carson could provide until the new RTI
construction could be completed.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The existing RTI will continue to operate in a
_______________________
wholly (quality and quantity) inadequate facility that has a significant,
negative impact on the mission of the RTI until CTS II is constructed and
operational. The entire site poses a negative impact to the COARNG s
recruiting and retention of fully qualified full-time and M-day personnel.
Fuel costs will increase, training time will decrease and unit readiness will
be degraded, due to unit travel to alternate training facilities.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
PAGE NO. 34
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Colorado ARNG
Colorado
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Regional Trainign Institute (RTI),
080067
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
MAR 2009
_________
35
_________
65
_________
100
_________
JUN 2009
_________
AUG 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
3,562
_________
3,562
_________
2,375
_________
1,187
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
OCT 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2013
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: COL DEBORAH ROBERTS
Phone Number: 720 847-8921
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 35
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Colorado ARNG
INSNO= COARNG
COST INDEX
Colorado
1.02
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Reservist - 1 weekends/month 0 nights/week Full-Time Personnel - 0 days/week
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
BOULDER, CO
48.00 miles MILES
159
(1,707 SF)
ARNG
FT COLLINS, CO
17.00 miles MILES
159
(1,707 SF)
ARNG
LONGMONT, CO
34.00 miles MILES
159
(1,707 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 Readiness Center
2,854 m2
(30,717 SF)
7,500 OCT 2008 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
11
OCT 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
None
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
211
171
171
721
171
HAATS
RTI
READINESS CENTER
ORTC BARRACKS
READINESS CENTER
41,000
43,000
21,000
45,000
16,565
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 22 MAY 2008
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
PAGE NO. 36
7
7
0
0
7
7
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
206
206
11
11
DD
FORM
MAY 78
195
195
1390s1
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Colorado ARNG
Colorado
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
D WEAPONS COMPANY
1157 CS CO FS
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= COARNG
UIC
______
COINB
WPZ2A
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
79
79
127 _______
127
_______
206
206
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
121
46
2
2
1
__________
ACTUAL
______
121
46
2
2
1
__________
TOTALS
172
172
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
PAGE NO.
37
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Colorado ARNG
Colorado
Readiness Center
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
080202
7,500
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center
Building Information Systems
Energy Managment Control System
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp(
335) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
2,854 (
-----
--------
UNIT COST
30,717)
COST ($000)
2,004
-----
6,196
(5,719)
(130)
(115)
(115)
(117)
--------
3,068
(200)
(250)
(1,236)
(200)
(335)
(351)
(496)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
9,264
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
463
_________
SUBTOTAL
9,727
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
292
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
10,019
State Share
2,519
TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST
7,500
TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
7,500
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
A specially designed Readiness Center of permanent
masonry type construction, with standing seam roof, concrete floors and
mechanical and electrical equipment with emergency power generator backup.
Supporting facilities will include weapons cleaning, maintenance, issue,
turn-in sheds, military vehicle parking and access roads and POV parking,
security fencing and Delite motor pool lighting, vehicle wash system and pump
house, loading ramp, flammable materials storage building, controlled waste
handling facility, and sidewalks. Extension of local utility company gas,
electric, sewer, water and communication utilities to the building site will
be necessary. Actual foundation design will be determined during design.
Physical security measures will be incorporated into design including minimum
feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading
areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent access when standoff
distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy conserving features will
be incorporated into design and standard HVAC/MEP systems commissioning will
be included.
PAGE NO.
38
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Colorado ARNG
Colorado
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
080202
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
8,422 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: Construct a new Readiness Center facility and the infrastructure to
________
support this facility as stated above. Location is in Fort Collins by COARNG
with Windsor area on state land in order to support the Army’s Grow the Force
program. (New Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The facility is required to stand-up units newly assigned to
____________
the COARNG in order to support the Army’s Grow the Force Program. This
Readiness Center will provide space for administration, supply, and training.
No other adequate facilities are available to support these units. The new
facility will be constructed on State land.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. An economic analysis has been
prepared and utilized in evaluating this project. This project is the best
method to satisfy the requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Installations and Housing) certifies that this project has been considered
for joint use potential. The facility will be available for use by other
components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective
practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and construction
of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and
other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
(3)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
OCT 2008
_________
65
_________
65
_________
100
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
_________
1,874
_________
1,874
_________
1,249
_________
PAGE NO. 39
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Colorado ARNG
Colorado
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
080202
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(e) In-house........................................ _________
625
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
NOV 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: COL Deborah Roberts
Phone Number: (720) 250-1361
PAGE NO. 40
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Colorado Springs Readiness Center
INSNO= 08A40
COST INDEX
Colorado Springs, Colorado
1.01
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
RESERVISTS - 1 WEEKENDS/MONTH 0 NIGHTS/WEEK FULL-TIME PERSONNEL - 5 DAYS/WEEK
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
,
.00 miles
159
(1,707 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 READINESS CENTER
7,788 m2
(83,833 SF)
20,000 OCT 2007 OCT 2009
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
25 NOV 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 01 OCT 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
12
12
3
3
9
9
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
344
344
30
30
314
314
PAGE NO. 41
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Colorado Springs Readiness Center
Colorado Springs, Colorado
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
HHC INFANTRY BATTALION
ALPHA RIFLE COMPANY
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 08A40
UIC
______
COINBO
COINBA
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
213
213
131 _______
131
_______
344
344
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
AUTHORIZED
__________
59
20
__________
ACTUAL
______
59
20
__________
TOTALS
79
79
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
42
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Colorado Springs Readiness Center
Colorado Springs, Colorado
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Readiness Center
6.CATEGORY CODE
05D5896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
080201
20,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center
Unheated Encl/Shed-TP Vhcl Strg
Building Information Systems
Controlled Waste Faclity
Circulation and Access
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Steam And/Or Chilled Water Dist
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp( 1,318) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
LS
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SY)
QUANTITY
6,133 (
1,628 (
-27.87 (
814.39 (
--------
UNIT COST
66,010)
17,523)
300)
974)
1,691
1,142
-1,656
139.61
--------
COST ($000)
13,443
(10,368)
(1,860)
(200)
(46)
(114)
(855)
5,377
(100)
(200)
(100)
(2,729)
(1,318)
(436)
(494)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
18,820
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
941
_________
SUBTOTAL
19,761
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
593
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
20,354
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
20,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed Readiness Center of
permanent, masonry type construction, with standing seam roof, concrete floors
and mechanical and electrical equipment with emergency power generator backup.
Supporting facilities will include unheated storage, military vehicle parking,
access roads, POV parking, security fencing, Delite motor pool lighting,
vehicle wash system, pump house, loading ramp, flammable materials storage
building, controlled waste handling facility, and sidewalks. Extension of
local city gas, electric, sewer, water and communication utilities to the
building site will be necessary. Actual foundation design will be determined
during design. Physical security measures to include minimum feasible standoff
distance IAW UFC to prevent access when standoff distance cannot be
maintained. Cost effective energy conserving features will be incorporated
into design and standard HVAC/MEP systems. Commissioning will be included
during design and construction.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: Construct a 83,983 SF new Readiness Center and the infrastructure to
________
support this facility as stated above. Location is a parcel along the
southeast board of Fort Carson (Federal property). (New Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
43
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Colorado Springs Readiness Center
Colorado Springs, Colorado
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
080201
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
Energy Management Control Syste LS
SDD and EPAct05
LS
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
QUANTITY
----
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
---Total
(290)
(271)
(294)
_________
855
REQUIREMENT:
The facility is required to provide a training facility for the
____________
new HHC and CO A of the 1/157th IN BN. This facility shall accommodate the
training, equipment and personnel readiness requirements in support of the
____ MEB (UTARNG). No other adequate facilities are available to support these
units. The Force Structure committee has reviewed all possible alternatives to
permanently house these units. There is no facility suitable for these units.
The new facility will be constructed on Federal land.
CURRENT SITUATION:
This is an entirely new unit to the ARNG and the COARNG.
__________________
The COARNG will add a total of over 800 NEW soldiers for the entire IN BN.
This an increase in force structure of nearly 25% of the existing COARNG force
structure. We reviewed all existing facilities, and their are no facilities
capable of permanently housing these units. Existing COARNG facilities,
particularly Readiness Centers are severely undersized throughout the state
for the existing force structure, let alone another 800 soldiers. Failure to
construct/acquire new facilities will force us to place these units in
unacceptably small facilities that clearly do not meet NG PAM 415-12 criteria.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
If the project is not approved, the newly assigned
_______________________
units will be forced to occupy facilities that are nearly incapable of
supporting the units’ maintenance, training and mobilization readiness
standards. Lack of military vehicle parking will cause units to store there
vehicles at other locations. Lack of appropriate storage facilities will incur
risk in logistical management. Lack of administrative facilities will result
in a lack of soldier care that will adversely affect the morale and retention
of the soldiers in these units.
ADDITIONAL: Additional: This project has been coordinated with the
___________
installation physical security plan, and all physical security measures are
included. All required antiterrorism protection measures are included.
Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been explored during
project development. This project is the only feasible option to meet the
requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and
Housing) certifies that this project has been considered for joint use
potential. The facility will be available for use by other components.
Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13123 and other
applicable laws and Executive orders. Joint Use Certification: The Deputy
PAGE NO. 44
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Colorado Springs Readiness Center
Colorado Springs, Colorado
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
080201
ADDITIONAL:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that
this project has been considered for joint use potential. This facility will
be available for use by other components. Antiterrorism/Force Protection: This
project has been coordinated with the installation physical security plan. All
required physical security and anti-terrorism/ force protection measures are
included.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
OCT 2007
_________
65
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2008
_________
OCT 2009
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
_________
1,782
_________
1,782
_________
1,188
_________
594
_________
PAGE NO. 45
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Colorado Springs Readiness Center
Colorado Springs, Colorado
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
080201
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (CONTINUED)
_______________________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: COL Deborah Roberts
Phone Number: 720-250-1361
PAGE NO. 46
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
High-Altitude Army Aviation Training
INSNO= 08B07
COST INDEX
Gypsum, Colorado
1.01
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal flight training operation and administration five days/evenings per week, with a two-day training
assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Denver, CO
135.00 miles Armory
159
(1,707 )
1999
ARNG
Grand Junction, CO
111.00 miles Armory
159
(1,707 )
1959
ARNG
Grand Junction, CO
115.00 miles OMS
159
(1,707 )
1949
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
21110 Army Aviation Support Facilit
10,533 m2
(113,380 SF)
39,000 APR 2007 JUN 2008
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
14
FEB 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
171
171
171
721
171
RTI
READINESS CENTER
READINESS CENTER
ORTC BARRACKS
READINESS
43,000
21,000
13,400
45,000
16,565
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
1,589
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 15 NOV 2002
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
122
86
37
28
83
56
2
2
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
120
84
37
28
83
56
PAGE NO. 47
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
High-Altitude Army Aviation Training
Gypsum, Colorado
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 08B07
UNIT DESIGNATION
UIC
________________
______
High Altitude Army National Guard Aviation Trai
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
120 _______
84
_______
120
84
Assigned/Authorized: 70%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
OH-58 D
UH-1
AH-64
UH-60
CH-47
AUTHORIZED
__________
3
3
4
2
4
6
3
__________
ACTUAL
______
3
3
4
2
4
6
3
__________
TOTALS
25
25
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
48
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
High-Altitude Army Aviation Training Si
Gypsum, Colorado
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
Army Aviation Support Fac/High Altitu
7.PROJECT NUMBER
211
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
080062
39,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Hangar, Operations and Maintena
Ground Support Equipment Storag
Flammable Materials Storage Bui
Controlled Waste Handling Facil
Unheated Aircraft Storage Facil
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
250) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
8,485
111.48
37.16
27.87
1,871
(
(
(
(
(
-------
UNIT COST
91,336)
1,200)
400)
300)
20,144)
2,635
1,219
3,513
3,524
2,767
-------
COST ($000)
28,586
(22,358)
(136)
(131)
(98)
(5,178)
(685)
7,865
(470)
(200)
(6,226)
(250)
(219)
(500)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
36,451
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,823
_________
SUBTOTAL
38,274
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
1,148
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
39,422
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
39,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $2,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed AASF aviation,
instruction, and billeting facility of permanent masonry and steel
construction with standing seam metal roof, concrete floor, mechanical and
electrical equipment. Partitions of drywall or masonry block. Supporting
facilities are rigid paving for aircraft parking/tie down pads, ground support
equipment, hover lanes, aircraft wash facility, exterior lighting, fire
protection, and fencing. Physical security measures will be incorporated into
design including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas,
and vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent
access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Air conditioning: 56 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
10,533 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to build a Limited AASF, classroom training
________
facility, and billeting of permanent type construction to serve the peace time
missions of the High Altitude Aviation Training Site. The space will permit
all personnel to perform the maintenance and training mission that will
improve the readiness and safety stature of the units that send their pilots
for training. (Current Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
49
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
High-Altitude Army Aviation Training
Gypsum, Colorado
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Army Aviation Support Fac/High Altitude Aviation
080062
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
Energy Management Control Syste LS
SDD and EPAct05
LS
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
QUANTITY
----
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
---Total
(25)
(558)
(102)
_________
685
REQUIREMENT:
A 7,518 SM (80,929 SF) Limited AASF, classroom training
____________
facility, billeting, and supporting facilities are required to adequately
provide maintenance for the equipment and training for the student pilots that
require use of this facility with hangar, administrative, supply, classroom,
locker, latrine and maintenance space.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The HAATS is performing its current training mission on
__________________
the municipal airport in Eagle, CO. The Army has determined that the mission
of the HAATS will be transformed to establish and train pilots to attain an
Additional Skill Identifier (ASI) for all aviation commanders and instructor
pilots. The COARNG currently has a lease for the property occupied by the
current HAATS operation and has leased an additional 15 acres to accommodate
the new facilities required for the transformed HAATS mission.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Without this project there will not be sufficient
_______________________
facilities to accommodate the transformed training mission of the HAATS. The
HAATS location provides the required environment for this training (view of
the operational areas, proximity to the flight line, and proximity to
maintenance elements that support the training mission associated with this
training. Acquisition of an alternate training location would not be feasible.
The only alternative would be to not perform the Army’s transformed mission at
the HAATS. The HAATS is the ONLY DoD location that is capable of accommodating
this training. Therefore, if the transformed mission is not accommodated at
the HAATS, it will not be performed. The overall readiness of the National
Guard, the Army, elements of DoD, and NATO would also be adversely affected as
the transformed training would not be performed.
ADDITIONAL: This project complies with the scope and design criteria of
___________
National Guard Pamphlet 415-12. This project, as a whole, is a unique facility
as it is a combination of a Limited AASF, training classroom and billeting.
Therefore the COARNG has coordinated with the NGB School Proponent, NGB-AVS,
to establish the elements and the space requirements (when different from
standard criteria) for this facility. The component parts of this facility are
based on current criteria or NGB-AVS direction. The most similar DoD standards
for readiness center construction do not address all of the current criteria
incorporated in the HAATS design, and thus do not yield accurate cost
estimates. Therefore, state historical costs for construction of like
PAGE NO. 50
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
High-Altitude Army Aviation Training
Gypsum, Colorado
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Army Aviation Support Fac/High Altitude Aviation
080062
ADDITIONAL:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
facilities were used to develop baseline unit cost and were adjusted for size,
fiscal year and location. This project has been coordinated with the
installation physical security plan, and all physical security measures are
included. All required antiterrorism protection measures are included.
Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been explored during
project development. This project is the only feasible option to meet the
requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and
Housing) certifies that this project has been considered for joint use
potential. The facility will be available for use by other components.
Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will
be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable
laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
APR 2007
_________
100
_________
_________
_________
AUG 2007
_________
JUN 2008
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
NOV 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
NOV 2012
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
_________
3,406
_________
3,406
_________
1,135
_________
2,271
_________
PAGE NO. 51
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
High-Altitude Army Aviation Training
Gypsum, Colorado
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Army Aviation Support Fac/High Altitude Aviation
080062
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: COL DEBORAH ROBERTS
Phone Number: 720-250-1361
PAGE NO. 52
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Army Aviation Support Facility
INSNO= 09906
COST INDEX
Windsor Locks, Connecticut
1.14
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
CTARNG Windsor Locks, CT
.50 miles CSMS
1,003 m2 (10,800 SF)
1954
AR
Windsor Locks, CT
2.00 miles OMS
418 m2 (4,500 SF)
CTARNG Enfield, CT
12.00 miles Readiness Center
1,669 m2 (17,966 SF)
1965
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 Readiness Center
10,281 m2
(110,663 SF)
41,000 OCT 2008 JUN 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
01
JUL 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
450
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 06 AUG 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
9
9
0
0
0
0
9
9
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
358
358
58
58
300
300
PAGE NO. 53
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Army Aviation Support Facility
Windsor Locks, Connecticut
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 09906
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
1-169th HHC (GSAB)
1-169 CO D (AVUM)
1-169th CO E (FSC)
2-104th AVN HHC DET 2
2-104th AVN CO B DET 1
2-104th AVN CO D DET 2
2-104th AVN CO E DET 2
3-142th AVN HHC DET 1
3-142th AVN CO C
3-142th AVN CO D DET 1
3-142th AVN CO E DET 1
UIC
______
WYHMT0
WYHMD0
WYHME0
WUASB1
WUASB1
WUASD2
WUASE2
WUATT1
WUAT0
WUATD1
WUATE1
TSPN
____
20122
20122
20122
4728
4728
4728
4728
4742
4742
4742
4742
DET 6 OSA COM
W7Y406
46591
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
MTOE/TDA
________
74
31
58
3
26
31
12
2
22
13
9
74
31
58
3
26
31
12
2
22
13
9
8 _______
8
_______
289
289
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
* UNITS THAT MUST TRAIN ON SAME WEEKEND.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
WHEELED
AUTHORIZED
__________
37
37
1
20
6
62
__________
ACTUAL
______
37
37
1
20
6
62
__________
TOTALS
163
163
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
54
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Army Aviation Support Facility
Windsor Locks, Connecticut
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Readiness Center
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
090010
41,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center
Unheated Storage Building
Energy Management Control Syste
Controlled Waste Facilty
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp( 5,264) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2 (SF)
m2 (SF)
LS
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
9,385 ( 101,018)
868.18 (
9,345)
-27.87 (
300)
---------
UNIT COST
2,852
1,991
-1,991
---------
COST ($000)
29,530
(26,770)
(1,729)
(250)
(56)
(250)
(475)
8,098
(569)
(85)
(1,787)
(5,264)
(224)
(169)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
37,628
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,881
_________
SUBTOTAL
39,509
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
1,185
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
40,694
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
41,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $2,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed readiness center of
permanent masonry type construction, brick and concrete block units with
concrete floors, and a standing seam, built-up or single membrane roof. A
two-story structure with mechanical and electrical equipment. Outside
supporting facilities include military and privately-owned vehicle parking,
fencing, sidewalks, exterior fire protection, outside lighting, access roads,
detached facility sign, wash platform, fuel storage & dispensing system, and
flagpole. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design
including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and
vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent
access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy
conserving features will be incorporated into design, including energy
management control systems and high efficiency motors, lighting, and HVAC
systems. Air conditioning: 330 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
9,882 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to provide a readiness center, of permanent type
________
construction, to serve the peacetime missions of the assigned unit. The space
will permit all personnel to perform the necessary tasks that will improve the
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
55
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Army Aviation Support Facility
Windsor Locks, Connecticut
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
090010
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
units readiness posture. The site of the project is on state land. (Current
Mission) (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
This facility is required to house all elements of the
____________
Connecticut National Guard Aviation unit. These units will have a required
strength of 358 personnel. The armory will provide the necessary
administrative, training and storage areas required to achieve proficiency in
required training tasks. An existing state-owned site is available for this
project.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The 1-169 GSAB is located in an inadequate facility along
__________________
with Headquarters, Headquarters Company. This facility is very old and has
been determined to be structurally unsound and unfeasible for rehabilitation.
The facility is inadequate to fully support aviation units due to the lack of
adequate parking, storage and training areas. With the construction of a new
transformation readiness center, the existing Armory will be closed.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The units’ ability to meet its readiness, recruiting
_______________________
and retention, and training objectives will continue to be adversely affected
if the personnel are not provided with the adequate facilities. Delays in the
funding of this project will force the continued use of an inadequate and
unsound facility and the present facility’s deficiencies will continue to
negatively impact troop readiness and morale. The lack of proper and adequate
training, storage and administrative areas will continue to impair the
attainment of required mobilization readiness levels.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
PAGE NO. 56
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
OCT 2008
_________
65
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
JUN 2010
_________
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Army Aviation Support Facility
Windsor Locks, Connecticut
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
090010
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
_________
0
_________
_________
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
NOV 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: LTC Gerald J. Lukowski
Phone Number: 860 493-2725
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 57
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 58
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
New Castle Training Spt Rifle Range
INSNO= 10605
COST INDEX
New Castle, Delaware
1.05
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ANG
New Castle, DE
1.00 miles Headquarters
2,415 m2 (26,000 SF)
1996
ARNG
Wilmington, DE
5.00 miles Readiness Center
1,514 m2 (16,300 SF)
1955
ARNG
Wilmington, DE
5.00 miles Readiness Center
4,468 m2 (48,092 SF)
1970
ARNG
Wilmington, DE
8.00 miles Readiness Center
7,254 m2 (78,080 SF)
1960
ARNG
New Castle, DE
.50 miles AASF
4,042 m2 (43,513 SF)
1977
ARNG
New Castle, DE
6.00 miles USP & FO
2,051 m2 (22,074 SF)
1970
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
SCOPE
_____
($000)
______
START
_____
CMPL
____
17180 Armed Forces Reserve Center
9,880 m2
(106,344 SF)
27,000 OCT 2008 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
22 JUN 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
JOINT CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
171
171
Joint Regional Training Institute
Readiness Center
5,443
7,058
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 04 NOV 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
163
163
60
60
75
75
28
28
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
332
332
122
122
210
210
PAGE NO. 59
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
New Castle Training Spt Rifle Range
New Castle, Delaware
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
CMD HQ DARC MOB CMD
JT FORCES CMD HQ DE
JT FORCESS CMD HQ DE
HQ W8BZ 99TH REGIONAL
DET MED DET
TM PUBLIC AFFAIRS DET
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 10605
UIC
______
W84641
W8AFAA
W8AFNA
W8BZ03
W8YXAA
WP2XAA
TSPN
____
56751
56751
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
4
2
95
145
16
16
0
1
40
29
8 _______
4
_______
163
197
46781
56751
34502
Assigned/Authorized: 120%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
WHEELED
AUTHORIZED
__________
27
1
1
2
__________
ACTUAL
______
0
0
0
0
__________
TOTALS
31
0
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
60
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
New Castle Training Spt Rifle Range
New Castle, Delaware
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
Joint Armed Forces Reserve Center
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
100037
27,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Reserve Center Building
Building Information Systems
Emerg Pow Gen, Pad and Hook Up
ARNG ORG Parking Add (Rigid Mat
Navy ORG Parking Add (Rigid Mat
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp( 3,475) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Information Technology
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
m2 (SY)
m2 (SY)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
9,880 ( 106,344)
--41.81 (
50)
1,045 (
1,250)
--------
UNIT COST
2,982
--119.59
119.60
--------
COST ($000)
31,178
(29,457)
(250)
(125)
(5)
(125)
(1,216)
5,808
(252)
(250)
(987)
(90)
(3,475)
(654)
(100)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
36,986
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,849
_________
SUBTOTAL
38,835
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
1,165
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
40,000
Other DoD Component Share
13,000
TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST
27,000
TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
27,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(2,092)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed Armed Forces Reserve
Center of permanent masonry type construction, brick and concrete block units
with concrete floors, and a built-up or single membrane roof. A 2 story
structure with mechanical and electrical equipment. Outside supporting
facilities include military and privately-owned vehicle parking, fencing,
sidewalks, exterior fire protection, outside lighting, access roads, detached
facility sign, and flagpole. Physical security measures will be incorporated
into design including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking
areas, and vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to
prevent access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective
energy conserving features will be incorporated into the design, including
energy management control systems and high efficiency motors, lighting, and
HVAC systems. Air conditioning: 340 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
15,812 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
5,574 m2
________
PROJECT: This project provides a Joint Armed Forces Reserve Center facility
________
of permanent type construction, to serve the peacetime missions of the
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
61
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
New Castle Training Spt Rifle Range
New Castle, Delaware
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Joint Armed Forces Reserve Center
100037
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
Loading Dock (Less Access)
Detached Facility Sign
3 Flagpoles
Energy Management Control Syste
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
-------
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
------Total
(91)
(19)
(30)
(200)
(410)
(466)
_________
1,216
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
assigned units and space for all personnel to perform the necessary tasks that
will improve the units’ readiness posture. (Current Mission) (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
Our goal is to create a Joint Force Headquarters as directed by
____________
the Chief, National Guard Bureau. This facility is required to house all
elements of the Joint Force Headquarters (ARNG and ANG), 166th Info Opns
Squadron (DEANG), 287th Army Band and the 101st Public Affairs Det. These
units will have a combined required strength of 317 personnel. The center will
provide the necessary administrative, training and storage areas required to
achieve proficiency in required training tasks. This facility will be
constructed on a 10 acre site to be purchased by the State of Delaware.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing State Headquarters is currently located in
__________________
an elementary school in Wilmington, DE. The 78,000 SF facility is 45 years old
and extremely energy inefficient. It lacks the required parking, storage, and
training areas. The existing Air National Guard Headquarters is located at the
New Castle County Airport ANG base along with the Wing Headquarters. Although
the facility meets the minimum requirements for the ANG Hq’s, it is not large
enough to include the ARNG Headquarters function as well. We plan to move the
72nd Troop Command to the existing State Headquarters and the 166th Airlift
Wing will take over control of the existing ANG Headquarters facility. To
achieve a true joint headquarters, we must move both ARNG and ANG Headquarters
operations into a new facility. Neither existing facility is large enough to
accommodate both Headquarters. We also plan to include the 166th Information
Operations Squadron into the faculty.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The units’ ability to meet their readiness,
_______________________
recruiting and retention, and training objectives will continue to be
adversely affected if the personnel are not provided with adequate facilities.
Delays in the funding of this project will force the continued use of
inadequate facilities and the present facilities’ deficiencies will continue
to negatively impact troop readiness and morale. The lack of proper and
adequate training, storage and administrative areas will continue to impair
PAGE NO. 62
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
New Castle Training Spt Rifle Range
New Castle, Delaware
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Joint Armed Forces Reserve Center
100037
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
(CONTINUED)
______________________________________
the attainment of required mobilization readiness levels for both the Army and
Air National Guard units. Moreover, we will not have one joint force
headquarters facility as directed by the Chief, National Guard Bureau.
ADDITIONAL: The most similar DoD standards for readiness center construction
___________
do not address all of the current criteria incorporated in the Army National
Guard Readiness Center design and thus do not yield accurate cost estimates.
Therefore, state historical costs for construction of like facilities were
used to develop baseline unit cost and were adjusted for size, fiscal year and
location. This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
(3)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
OCT 2008
_________
35
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
_________
3,601
_________
3,601
_________
2,401
_________
1,200
_________
PAGE NO. 63
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
New Castle Training Spt Rifle Range
New Castle, Delaware
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Joint Armed Forces Reserve Center
100037
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(4) Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
NOV 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
APR 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
IT/Telecom
OPA
2012
TOTAL
2,092
______
2,092
CFMO Name: LTC Christopher Prosser
Phone Number: 302 326-7130
PAGE NO. 64
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Georgia ARNG
INSNO= GAARNG
COST INDEX
Georgia
.85
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Reservist - 1 weekends/month 0 nights/week Full-Time Personnel - 5 days/week
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Dahlonega, GA
22.00 miles Armory
2,051
(22,074 SF)
ARNG
Rome, GA
22.00 miles Armory
2,051
(22,074 SF)
ARNG
Marietta, GA
24.00 miles Armory
2,051
(22,074 SF)
ARNG
Canton, GA
24.00 miles Armory
2,051
(22,074 SF)
ARNG
Lawrenceville, GA
25.00 miles Armory
2,051
(22,074 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
17180 Readiness Center
SCOPE
_____
9,385 m2
(101,015 SF)
($000)
______
17,000
START
CMPL
_____
____
OCT 2009 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
10 MAY 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
None
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
171
171
214
171
171
Readiness
Readiness
MATES
Readiness
Readiness
Center
Center
11,100
10,000
17,500
14,500
3,845
Center
Center
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 22 MAY 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
30
30
9
9
21
21
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
438
438
48
48
390
390
PAGE NO. 65
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Georgia ARNG
Georgia
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= GAARNG
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
560th BFSB-BSC
560th BFSB HHC
420 Signal CO
348th Brigade Support Bat
UIC
______
WPCBAA
WPZOT0
WPZEAA
WPQUA
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
212
212
170
170
56
56
0 _______
0
_______
438
438
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
55
36
10
7
6
__________
ACTUAL
______
55
36
10
7
6
__________
TOTALS
114
114
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
66
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Georgia ARNG
Georgia
Readiness Center
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
130127
17,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp( 1,400) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
9,385 ( 101,015)
---
--------
UNIT COST
1,585
---
COST ($000)
15,286
(14,877)
(204)
(205)
--------
4,549
(145)
(120)
(2,011)
(630)
(1,400)
(126)
(117)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
19,835
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
992
_________
SUBTOTAL
20,827
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
625
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
21,452
Other DoD Component Share
4,452
TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST
17,000
TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
17,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed Multi Unit Readiness
Center and community center of permanent masonry type construction with
standing seam metal roof, concrete floors and mechanical and electrical
equipment. Supporting facilities will include vehicle maintenance, unheated
storage, military vehicle parking and access roads, POV parking, security
fencing and motor pool lighting, loading ramp, flammable materials storage,
controlled waste handling facility and sidewalks. Extension of gas, electric,
sewer, water and communication utilities to the building site will be
necessary. Physical security measures will be incorporated into the design
including minimum standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and vehicle
unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping and bollards to prevent access when
standoff distance cannot be maintained. Building will be designed to achieve
LEED Silver Certification. Air Conditioning is 340 Tons
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
9,385 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to construct a new 101,015 SF multi unit readiness
________
center with an additional community center to support this facility as stated
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
67
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Georgia ARNG
Georgia
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
130127
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
above. The site of the project is on state land. (New Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
This facility is required to house all elements of the
____________
Headquarters, Headquarters Company; Network Support Company; Brigade Support
Company, of the Battlefield Surveillance Brigade These units will have an
authorized strength of 438 personnel. The armory will provide the necessary
administrative, training and storage areas required to achieve proficiency in
required training tasks.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The unit E dates are FY 09 and FY11. Temporary facilities
__________________
will be leased until a permanent facility can be constructed.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The units will quickly reach and exceed the leased
_______________________
buildings ability to meet mission requirements of the new units. Unit s
readiness, recruiting and retention, and training objectives will become
adversely affected if the personnel are not provided with the adequate
facilities.
ADDITIONAL: Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been
___________
explored during project development. This project is the only feasible option
to meet this requirement. Sustainable principles will be integrated into the
design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with
Executive Order 13423 and other applicable laws and Executive Orders. This
project has been coordinated with the installation physical security plan. All
required physical security measures and all anti-terrorism/force protection
measures are included. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Installations and Housing) certifies that this project has been considered
for joint use potential. This facility will be available for use by other
components.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
(3)
PAGE NO. 68
OCT 2009
_________
35
_________
65
_________
100
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Georgia ARNG
Georgia
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
130127
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
_________
2,092
_________
2,092
_________
1,395
_________
697
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
NOV 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: COL SCOTT CARTER
Phone Number:
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 69
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 70
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Dobbins Air Force Base
INSNO= 13C35
COST INDEX
Dobbins AFB, Georgia
.85
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
USAFR
DOBBINS, GA
.00 miles MILE
2,051
(22,074 SF)
ARNG
NAVAL AIR STATION A
1.00 miles MILE
2,051
(22,074 SF)
USMCR
MARIETTA, GA
1.00 miles MILE
2,051
(22,074 SF)
ARNG
MARIETTA, GA
3.00 miles MILE
2,051
(22,074 SF)
ARNG
KENNESAW, GA
7.00 miles MILE
2,051
(22,074 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 Readiness Center
8,305 m2
(89,390 SF)
10,400 FEB 2010 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
07
MAY 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 08 JAN 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
18
18
1
1
17
17
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
306
224
15
10
291
214
PAGE NO. 71
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Dobbins Air Force Base
Dobbins AFB, Georgia
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 13C35
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
(CO QM CO (AERIAL DELI)
TRP C (BN RECON & SURVIELLAN)
UIC
______
WPAXAA
WPZ1C0
TSPN ________
MTOE/TDA
____
31007 10443LNG03
34907 49225GNG52
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
168
94
138 _______
130
_______
306
224
Assigned/Authorized: 73%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
58
44
10
2
__________
ACTUAL
______
58
44
10
2
__________
TOTALS
114
114
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
72
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Dobbins Air Force Base
Dobbins AFB, Georgia
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Readiness Center
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
130123
10,400
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center Addition
Readiness Center Alteration
Energy Management Control Syste
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
m2 (SF)
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp( 1,169) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Backup/Emergency Generator
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
3,474 (
4,831 (
----
-----
UNIT COST
37,390)
52,000)
COST ($000)
1,259
484.38
----
-----
7,081
(4,375)
(2,340)
(122)
(122)
(122)
2,493
(1,186)
(1,169)
(83)
(55)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
9,574
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
479
_________
SUBTOTAL
10,053
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
302
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
10,355
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
10,400
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Addition and alteration of an existing Aviation
Support Facilty of permanent masonry type construction with standing seam
metal roof, concrete floors and mechanical and electrical equipment. The
facility will be recategorized as a multi-unit Readiness Center to include
specialized space for the hanging, drying and packing of parachutes.
Supporting facilities will include vehicle maintenance, unheated storage,
military vehicle parking and access roads, POV parking, security fencing and
motor pool lighting, loading ramp, flammable materials storage, controlled
waste handling facility and sidewalks. Extension of gas, electric, sewer,
water and communication utilities to the building site will be necessary.
Physical security measures will be incorporated into the design including
minimum standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading
areas, berms, heavy landscaping and bollards to prevent access when standoff
distance cannot be maintained. Building addition/alteration will be designed
to achieve LEED Silver Certification.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to construct a new 37,390 SF addition and an
________
alteration of an existing multi unit readiness center. The site of the project
is on federal land at Dobbins Air Reserve Base. (New Mission) (New Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
73
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Dobbins Air Force Base
Dobbins AFB, Georgia
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
130123
REQUIREMENT:
This facility is required to house all elements of C Co 3/108th
____________
Long Range Surveillance Unit (LRSU) of the 560th BFSB and the 165th
Quartermaster Rigger Co. The units have a required strength of 291 personnel.
The armory will provide the necessary administrative, training and storage
areas required to achieve proficiency in required training tasks.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The C Co 3/108th LRSU is currently stationed at Charlie
__________________
Brown Airport Armory in Atlanta and will be relocating with the 165th QM
Rigger Co to the proposed facility once the current occupants move to the
facilities at NAS ATL no later than Sept 2010. The 165th QM Rigger Co
currently occupies temporary space in a former bowling alley at NAS ATL. As
the 165th QM Rigger Co continues to gain strength the space will become
severely overcrowded.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The units will quickly reach and exceed the current
_______________________
buildings’ ability to meet mission requirements of the new units. Units
readiness, recruiting and retention, and training objectives will become
adversely affected if the personnel are not provided with the adequate
facilities. The 165th QM Rigger Co has specialized requirements that are not
met with the current facility and will impair their ability to meet mission
and training requirements. Not having a specialized rigger facility has a
negative impact on the unit resulting in SM not being able to stay current in
their MOS and a significant loss of training hours. In order for the riggers
to pack parachutes on a muta 4, they spend 1/4 of their training time
traveling to FT Benning. This does not include the cost of transportation,
meals or lodging that would not be required during a normal drill. When
conducting ABN OPS, the unit pays the 507th to provide a malfunctions NCO to
cover the DZ which the unit would be able to do if they packed their own
parachutes instead of borrowing from the 507th.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. An economic analysis has been
prepared and utilized in evaluating this project. This project is the most
cost-effective method to satisfy the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. Mission requirements, operational
considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other components.
Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will
be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable
laws and Executive Orders.
PAGE NO. 74
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Dobbins Air Force Base
Dobbins AFB, Georgia
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
130123
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
JAN 2009
_________
15
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
862
_________
862
_________
575
_________
287
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
JAN 2011
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name:
Phone Number:
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 75
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 76
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Guam ARNG
INSNO= GMARNG
COST INDEX
Guam
2.64
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ANG
Andersen AFB, GU
12.00 miles ANGRC
1,394 m2 (15,000 SF)
1985
USAAR
Radio Barrigada, GU
1.00 miles ARC
1,668 m2 (17,959 SF)
1987
ARNG
Harmon, GU
3.00 miles TS
5 ha (13 AC)
1981
USAR
Sumay, GU
11.00 miles ARC
3,869 m2 (41,649 SF)
1982
USCGR
NAVACTS, GU
15.00 miles CGRC
1,858 m2 (20,000 SF)
1970
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
214
Combined Support Maintenance
SCOPE
_____
5,100 m2
(54,896 SF)
($000)
______
19,000
START
CMPL
_____
____
OCT 2007 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
05 APR 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
0
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 30 APR 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
172
166
71
65
101
101
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
977
917
152
171
825
746
PAGE NO. 77
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Guam ARNG
Guam
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= GMARNG
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
HQS, HQS DETACHMENT, GUAM AREA COMMAND
1-294TH INFANTRY BATTALION (LIGHT)
1224TH ENGINEER (UTILITIES) DETACHMENT
MED DETACHMENT
909TH QUARTERMASTER (WTR PURF) DETACHMENT
910TH QUARTERMASTER (WTR PURF) DETACHMENT
105TH TROOP COMMAND
294TH MI DETACHMENT
94TH MILITARY SUPPORT DETACHMENT
203RD GUAM RTI
778 TRAINING SITE MANAGER
UIC
______
W7TTAA
WYQJAA
WYQJAA
W799AA
WJ7JAA
WPVX90
W79GAA
WZGFAA
W7AGAA
W8FSAA
W7788AA
RECRUITING AND RETENTION
COMBAT SUPPORT COMPANY
W777AA
TSPN
____
56751
22234
31600
46761
46761
MTOE/TDA
________
NGW7TTAA
0705LNG02
05530LNG02
NGW799AA
1050LNG01
10570LNG01
43600 NGW79GAA
33415 34506ANG01
NGW7AGAA
NGW8FSAA
NGW778AA
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
158
570
57
40
16
16
29
5
22
8
2
154
471
60
27
22
12
6
5
3
10
0
9
9
45 _______
47
_______
977
826
Assigned/Authorized: 84%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
AUTHORIZED
__________
95
26
7
0
__________
ACTUAL
______
0
0
0
1
__________
TOTALS
128
1
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
78
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Guam ARNG
Guam
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Ph
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505965
7.PROJECT NUMBER
214
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
140001
19,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Combined CSMS/OMS Building
Enclosed Mil Veh Storage
Flammable Materials Facility
Controlled Waste Facility
Unheated Metal Storage Building
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
104) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
1,783
3,159
46.45
46.45
65.22
(
(
(
(
(
-------
UNIT COST
19,194)
34,000)
500)
500)
702)
6,006
1,558
4,844
4,306
2,153
-------
COST ($000)
16,493
(10,710)
(4,922)
(225)
(200)
(140)
(296)
465
(87)
(35)
(95)
(104)
(13)
(131)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
16,958
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
848
_________
SUBTOTAL
17,806
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
534
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
712
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
19,052
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
19,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,100 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. The CSMS consists of a specially designed
maintenance facility, plus two (3) maintenance work bays, plus administrative,
personnel, and work areas. Constructed of masonry block with brick veneer,
concrete floors, masonry block partitions with a built-up or single membrane
roofing system. Supporting facilities include military and customer vehicle
parking, fencing, wash platform, fuel storage and dispensing system, lube &
inspection rack, load ramp, control waste handling facility, sidewalks,
outside lighting, and access roads. Physical security measures will be
incorporated into design including maximum feasible standoff distance from
roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping,
and bollards to prevent access when standoff distance cannot be maintained.
Air conditioning: 8 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
5,100 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: A new maintenance facility and an enclosed military vehicle storage
________
to provide Direct Support and limited General Support repair capability and
storage area for vehicles and equipment of the GUARNG. (Current Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
79
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Guam ARNG
Guam
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Ph 1
140001
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
LS
QUANTITY
---
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
--Total
(239)
(57)
_________
296
REQUIREMENT:
A facility requirement for (54,896 SF) is requested to provide
____________
adequate maintenance support at DS/GS level to be performed on vehicles and
equipment authorized by the Table of Distribution and Allowances (TDA) and the
Modified Table of Organization and Equipment (MTOE) of the supported units.
Also to provide Site covered storage from the harsh climate conditions of Guam
for these vehicles and equipment. The site of the project will be on Federal
land.
CURRENT SITUATION:
There is neither a permanent maintenance nor covered
__________________
storage facility for the GUARNG. Individuals that will be working in this
facility are currently working in a structure designed primarily as a
warehouse which now acts a temporary OMS. This existing OMS-T located on Fort
Juan Muna, Guam, was built in 1993, and is extremely substandard. Since the
existing facility was constructed, the missions have changed, creating an
increase in equipment and maintenance requirements and causing a severe lack
of functional space. In addition, the constant exposure to the high heat,
humidity, and salt content of in the air around the island, military vehicles
and equipment are subjected to rapid rusting, deterioration, and failure
earlier than that expected in the normal life-cycle of the vehicles and
equipment. The existing facility will be disposed of IAW applicable State and
Federal regulatory procedures.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The lack of these facilities will continue to impact
_______________________
negatively on Troop moral. The lack of proper and adequate maintenance,
training, storage, and administrative areas will continue to impair the
attainment of the units’ required mobilization readiness levels.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
PAGE NO. 80
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Guam ARNG
Guam
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Ph 1
140001
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-build
(2)
OCT 2007
_________
35
_________
65
_________
100
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
724
_________
724
_________
724
_________
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
MAY 2011
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
APR 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: LTC NORMAN LIMTIACO
Phone Number: 671 734-4072
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 81
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 82
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Kalaeloa Readiness Center
INSNO= 15001
COST INDEX
Kapolei, Hawaii
2.23
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration, maintenance, and logistical operations five days per week, with a two-day training
assembly once per month and one two-week annual training period per year.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
Army
Schofield Barracks,
10.00 miles Army Barracks
1,858
(20,000 SF)
Navy
Pearl Harbor, HI
10.00 miles Various Naval Acti
1,858
(20,000 SF)
Air Forc Hickam AFB, HI
12.00 miles Air Force Base
1,858
(20,000 SF)
ARNG
Pearl City, HI
5.00 miles Armory, UTES
4,977 m2 (53,571 SF)
1997
ARNG
Wahiawa, HI
11.00 miles Armory, OMS
5,591 m2 (60,179 SF)
1993
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
SCOPE
_____
($000)
______
START
_____
CMPL
____
214
CSMS Ph 2
10,589 m2
(113,982 SF)
38,000 FEB 2008 JUL 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
21 APR 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
171
211
READINESS CENTER
AASF
34,000
28,814
0
0
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
3,000
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 27 JAN 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
206
206
25
25
176
176
5
5
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
2,568
2,568
393
393
2,175
2,175
PAGE NO. 83
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Kalaeloa Readiness Center
Kapolei, Hawaii
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 15001
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
29 INF BDE CBT TM
HHC 29 BDE SUPPORT BN
CO A (-) 29 BDE SUP BN (DISTRO)
CO C 29 BDE SUP BN (MED)
HHC 29 BDE SPECIAL TROOPS BN
CO A 29 BDE SP TRP BN (ENGR)
UIC
______
WPV3AA
WYC7T0
WYC7A0
WYC7C0
WPB5T0
WPB5A0
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
77302GNG04
63335GNG12
63335GNG12
63335GNG12
77405GNG09
77405GNG09
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
149
0
78
0
164
0
72
0
188
0
75 _______
0
_______
726
0
Assigned/Authorized: 0%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRACKED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
67
8
48
17
5
__________
ACTUAL
______
67
8
48
17
5
__________
TOTALS
145
145
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
84
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Kalaeloa Readiness Center
Kapolei, Hawaii
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
ADD, ALT
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Ph
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
214
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
150077
38,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
CSMS Addition (New Construction
CSMS Alteration/Rehab
Flammable Materials Facility
Controlled Waste Facility
Unheated Metal Storage Building
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
685) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
3,551
3,728
30.66
37.16
3,228
(
(
(
(
(
-------
UNIT COST
38,224)
40,124)
330)
400)
34,750)
5,328
2,799
861.06
731.97
731.95
-------
COST ($000)
32,320
(18,921)
(10,432)
(26)
(27)
(2,363)
(551)
3,253
(210)
(240)
(1,518)
(685)
(28)
(572)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
35,573
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,779
_________
SUBTOTAL
37,352
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
1,121
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
38,473
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
38,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $3,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed CSMS facility of
permanent masonry type construction, with sloped standing seam roof, concrete
floors and energy efficient mechanical and electrical equipment with emergency
power generator backup. Supporting facilities will include dynamometer,
pre-wired work stations, military vehicle parking and access/queing roads and
POV parking, security fencing and dark motor pool lighting, loading ramp,
flammable materials storage building, lube and inspection ramp, controlled
waste handling facility, and sidewalks. Extension of electric, sewer, water,
and communication utilities from adjacent streets to the building site will be
necessary. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design
including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and
vehicle unloading areas, fence with anti-climber, heavy landscaping, and
bollards to prevent access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Cost
effective energy conserving features will be incorporated into design,
including energy management control systems and high efficiency motors,
lighting, and HVAC systems. Air conditioning 61 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
10,589 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
1,802 m2
________
PROJECT: Construct a new 3,446 SM (37,091 SF) and renovate 3,645 SM (39,2236
________
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
85
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Kalaeloa Readiness Center
Kapolei, Hawaii
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
ADD, ALT
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Ph 2
150077
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
Energy Management Control Syste LS
SDD and EPAct05
LS
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
QUANTITY
----
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
---Total
(198)
(200)
(153)
_________
551
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
SF) existing facility and the infrastructure to support this facility as
stated above. Location is on a 150 acre, Federally licensed, HIARNG training
site on Kalaeloa. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The facility is required to maintain equipment and ensure the
____________
equipment is prepared for mobilization. CSMS #1 is an HIARNG TDA maintenance
facility which provides full-time DS and GS level support to an 2-299 Infantry
Battalion, 1-487 Field Artillery Battalion, Headquarters State Area Command
and attached units, 227 Engineer Company, and 229 Military Intelligence
Company . No other adequate facilities are available to support the units. The
Conceptual and Feasibility Studies have evaluated and recommend that CSMS #1
should be collocated with other logistics organizations at the Building 117
military training complex. The new facility will be constructed on
approximately 6 acres of the 150 acre training site located on Federal land.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The current facility is in poor condition and is 1/3 the
__________________
size authorized to support the facility mission. The current facility has
minimal space for storage of vehicles to be repaired. The current site is in
an area, that, according to the Diamond Head State Monument Plan, will be
eventually returned to a semi-wilderness condition.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
If the project is not approved, the present
_______________________
facility’s lack of adequate space will continue to reduce maintenance
efficiency, training, and mobilization. Readiness standards will continue to
decline. In accordance with the Diamond Head State Monument Plan, HIARNG is
required to vacate the Crater floor in order to allow the park to revert to a
semi-wilderness condition.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
PAGE NO. 86
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Kalaeloa Readiness Center
Kapolei, Hawaii
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
ADD, ALT
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Ph 2
150077
ADDITIONAL:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
FEB 2008
_________
35
_________
65
_________
100
_________
JUN 2008
_________
JUL 2010
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
MAR 2011
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
NOV 2012
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
_________
3,562
_________
3,562
_________
1,187
_________
2,375
_________
PAGE NO. 87
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Kalaeloa Readiness Center
Kapolei, Hawaii
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
ADD, ALT
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Ph 2
150077
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (CONTINUED)
_______________________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: LTC MARJEAN STUBBERT
Phone Number: 808-672-1530
PAGE NO. 88
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Gowen Field
INSNO= 16A20
COST INDEX
Boise, Idaho
.98
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Full-time training area-50 weeks per year to support IDT and AT for units of both ARNG and Active
Component Services.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Caldwell, ID
28.00 miles Armory
941 m2 (10,125 SF)
1968
ARNG
Emmett, ID
34.00 miles Armory
891 m2 (9,593 SF)
1971
ARNG
Nampa, ID
17.00 miles Armory
1,230 m2 (13,240 SF)
1964
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
72114 Barracks (ORTC)
7,790 m2
(83,853 SF)
17,500 OCT 2008 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
31
MAY 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
721
178
ORTC Barracks
Mulit-Purpose Training Range
48,000
20,000
0
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 18 JUL 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
609
370
159
116
450
254
PAGE NO. 89
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Gowen Field
Boise, Idaho
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 16A20
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
JOINT FORCES COMMAND
ID STARC
983 EN DET
116 BCT
1-183 AVN BN
CO B 1-112 AVN
204 REG (RTI)
1-163 MECHANIZED INFANTRY BN (MOARNG)
3-116 CAVALRY BATTLION (ORARNG)
UIC
______
W8ARAA
WYP3AA
WQV1AA
WYHAA
WYQRAA
WQRQB0
W8F9AA
WYLJAA
WQU1AA
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
201
131
377
224
24
26
2,373
2,246
397
429
35
26
73
42
701
701
546 _______
469
_______
4,727
4,294
Assigned/Authorized: 90%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
AUTHORIZED
__________
853
191
144
28
32
__________
ACTUAL
______
853
191
144
17
21
__________
TOTALS
1,248
1,226
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
90
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Gowen Field
Boise, Idaho
Barracks (ORTC)
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
721
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
160093
17,500
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Dining Facility
Battalion Hq/Company Supply- Ad
Energy Management Control Syste
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
m2 (SF)
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
565) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
2,152 (
5,638 (
----
------
UNIT COST
23,165)
60,688)
COST ($000)
2,099
1,711
----
------
14,881
(4,517)
(9,649)
(248)
(230)
(237)
1,466
(383)
(200)
(298)
(565)
(20)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
16,347
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
817
_________
SUBTOTAL
17,164
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
515
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
17,679
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
17,500
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of 1,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. This Barracks (ORTC) consists of a specially
designed facility to provide dining and admin space for soldier assigned for
training and mobilization at the Gowen Field Mobilization Station and Gowen
Field Training Area (GFTA). It will be constructed as a germinate facility
with materials consisting CMU with brick veneer and a metal standing seam
roof. The dining facility will be designed to accompany the 800 bed barracks
facility being built as part of the phasing. Two Battalion Headquarters and
Company Admin and Supply facilities will be provided adjacent to the barracks.
Supporting facilities will include privately owned vehicle parking, access
roads, curb and gutter, sidewalks, exterior lighting, exterior fire protection
and utilities as required. Physical security measures will be incorporated
into the design including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads,
parking areas, vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, an
electronic door security/access system and bollards to prevent access when
standoff distance cannot be maintained. The existing facility is on a closed
installation. Air conditioning: 280 tons
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
83,853 PN ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: A Transient Training Facility required to provide support for
________
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
91
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Gowen Field
Boise, Idaho
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Barracks (ORTC)
160093
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
enlisted soldiers, noncommissioned officers, and commissioned officers
training at the Gowen Field Mobilization Station, Boise, Idaho and support the
116th BCT (CAV BDE). This is a new facility constructed to support Gowen Field
Training Area as a Power Support Platform as Part of the Army Strategic
Mobility Program. The total training requirement is for barracks, dining
facility, supply and administrative space for 3,000 soldiers. The total
requirement is planned over five phases. Phase One is for 1-200 man barracks
with Phase Two completing the dining facilities and two - Battailion HQ with
eight company supply/admininstration facilities to be located at Gowen Field,
Idaho. Phases three-five will add the additional 600 bed spaces. (Current
Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The proposed project is required to provide facilities in
____________
support of quality of life, for enlisted soldiers, noncommissioned and
commissioned officers assigned to units training at, or attending professional
military education courses, training and mobilization at Gowen Field Training
Area.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The Gowen Field Mobilization Station consists of
__________________
inadequate temporary billeting, both in terms of quality and quantity, for
enlisted soldiers, noncommissioned officers, and commissioned officers. As a
result a waiver to use existing substandard billeting is being approved by NGB
on a yearly basis. Local off-post hotels and motels are being used to offset
the quantity of billeting for support personnel. This results in increased
overall costs for housing, transportation, and daily per diem expenses. In
some cases, soldiers are being housed as far as thirty miles from their
training location.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The emphasis on training, an increased use of our
_______________________
local facilities to conduct this training, and the number of enlisted,
noncommissioned officers, and commissioned officers attending training offered
at Gowen Field and Gowen Field Training Area, establish that facilities are
not adequate. Soldiers will continue to travel off base due to inadequate
quarters available in the Boise, Idaho area. A new facility will replace
sub-standard WWII temporary facilities.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
PAGE NO. 92
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Gowen Field
Boise, Idaho
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Barracks (ORTC)
160093
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
OCT 2008
_________
65
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
889
_________
774
_________
1,663
_________
1,109
_________
554
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: MAJ Eugene P. Gussenhoven
Phone Number: 208 422-3728
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 93
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 94
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Edgemeade Training Site
INSNO= 16911
COST INDEX
Mountain Home, Idaho
.98
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Reservists: 2nights/week. Full-time personnel: 5 days/week.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Mountain Home, ID
15.00 miles Mile
1,230
(13,240 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
21115 Tactical Unmanned Aircraft Sy
592 m2
(6,370 SF)
6,300 OCT 2008 MAR 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
01 OCT 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 20 JUL 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
3
3
1
1
2
2
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
29
1
2
0
27
1
PAGE NO. 95
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Edgemeade Training Site
Mountain Home, Idaho
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
DET 1, CO A, 116 BSTB
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 16911
UIC
______
WX42A1
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
29 _______
1
_______
29
1
Assigned/Authorized: 3%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
AUTHORIZED
__________
6
2
__________
ACTUAL
______
6
2
__________
TOTALS
8
8
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
96
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Edgemeade Training Site
Mountain Home, Idaho
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Fac
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
160122
6,300
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
TUAS Facility
Building Information Systems
Energy Management Control Syste
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
883) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
752.51 (
-----
-------
UNIT COST
8,100)
COST ($000)
3,014
-----
2,604
(2,268)
(123)
(70)
(70)
(73)
-------
3,031
(250)
(319)
(1,132)
(883)
(155)
(292)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
5,635
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
282
_________
SUBTOTAL
5,917
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
178
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
237
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
6,332
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
6,300
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $0.200 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. This project is to construct a TUAS readiness
center to house the UAS Platoon of the 116th HBCT. A specially designed TUAS
of permanent masonry type construction, with standing seam roof, concrete
floors and mechanical and electrical equipment with emergency power generator
backup. Supporting facilities will include flammable materials facility,
unheated metal storage building, unheated enclosed/shed for vehicle storage,
AT/FP, building information systems, unit supply, military vehicle parking
access roads and POV parking, security fencing and site lighting, loading
ramp, and sidewalks. Utilities include gas, water, electric, sewer, and
communication utilities to the building site that will be necessary. Actual
foundation design will be incorporated into design including maximum feasible
standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas,
berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent access. Cost effective
energy conserving features will be incorporated into design. Commissioning
included.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
753 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: A Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility is requested to serve
________
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
97
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Edgemeade Training Site
Mountain Home, Idaho
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility
160122
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
the peacetime and wartime training mission of this unit. The space will permit
all personnel to perform many necessary tasks that will improve their
readiness posture for completion of combat objectives. The existing armory
cannot be expanded. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
This readiness center will provide the necessary
____________
administration, indoor training, prep, and maintenance areas, and storage of
equipment space to achieve the proficiency in required training and to
accomplish the assigned readiness objectives. A site has been identified and
is located on Federal Land.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing facility is an old Gym building from an old
__________________
AF Titan missile control station (White Sands Missile Range)and was turned
over to the IDARNG in 1989. The current building is dilapidated and
significantly undersized for the units. The UAS platoon will be assigned to
this location and has been fielded its equipment in FY09.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The units’ ability to meet its readiness, recruiting
_______________________
and retention, and training objectives will continue to be adversely affected
if the personnel are not provided with an adequate and functional facility.
Delays in the funding of this project will force the continued use of an
inadequate, unsound facility. The existing facility’s deficiencies will
continue to negatively impact troop readiness and morale. Lastly, the lack of
proper and adequate training, storage and administrative areas will continue
to impair the attainment of required readiness training levels.
ADDITIONAL: Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design,
___________
development, and construction of the project in accordance with Executive
Order 13423 and other applicable laws and Executive Orders. The facility will
be designed and built to meet a LEED Silver standard. This project has been
coordinated with the installations AT/FP plan. Risk and threat analysis have
been performed in accordance with DA Pam 190/51 and TM 5-853-1, respectively.
Only protective measures required by regulation and ONLY the minimum standards
required by the "Interim Department of Defense AT/FP Construction Standards"
are needed. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and
Housing) certifies that this project has been considered for joint use
potential. This facility will be available for use by other components. This
project has been coordinated with the installation physical security plan, and
all physical security measures are included.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
PAGE NO. 98
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
OCT 2008
_________
65
_________
65
_________
100
_________
JUN 2009
_________
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Edgemeade Training Site
Mountain Home, Idaho
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility
160122
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(f) Design Complete Date............................ _________
MAR 2010
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
134
_________
134
_________
_________
134
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: LTC EUGENE GUSSENHOVEN
Phone Number: 208-272-3728
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 99
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 100
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Camp Lincoln Training Site
INSNO= 17C35
COST INDEX
Springfield, Illinois
1.20
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Springfield, IL
.00 miles OMS
1,230
(13,240 SF)
1900
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
214
Combined Support Maintenance
6,952 m2
(74,829 SF)
15,000 OCT 2008 AUG 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
07 APR 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
171
211
171
171
Readiness Center
AASF
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
11,000
24,000
17,696
12,688
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 01 APR 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
3
3
1
1
2
2
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
29
1
2
0
27
1
PAGE NO. 101
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Lincoln Training Site
Springfield, Illinois
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 17C35
UIC
______
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
__________
______
_______ _______
0
0
Assigned/Authorized: 0%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
AUTHORIZED
__________
1,136
0
0
0
0
0
__________
ACTUAL
______
1,136
0
0
0
0
0
__________
TOTALS
1,136
1,136
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
102
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Camp Lincoln Training Site
Springfield, Illinois
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
ADD
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Add
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
214
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
179237
15,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
CSMS
Flammabe Materials Facility
Controlled Waste Facility
Unheated Metal Storage Building
Energy Management Control Syste
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
650) Demo(
100)
Information Systems
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
6,456
50.26
27.87
418.06
(
(
(
(
--
--------
UNIT COST
69,488)
541)
300)
4,500)
1,561
753.48
753.50
592.02
--
--------
COST ($000)
11,046
(10,076)
(38)
(21)
(248)
(225)
(438)
2,482
(240)
(400)
(856)
(750)
(1)
(70)
(165)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
13,528
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
676
_________
SUBTOTAL
14,204
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
426
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
568
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
15,198
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
15,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. Construct an addition/alteration to the
existing CSMS facility consisting of additional administrative, personnel, and
work areas. Construction type will be a masonry/concrete block building with
concrete floors and pitched roof, electrical and plumbing systems, HVAC,
lighting. Project includes aprons to bay areas. Supporting facilities include
military and customer vehicle parking, fencing, wash platform, loading ramp,
control waste handling facility, sidewalks, outside lighting, and access
roads. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design, including
maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and vehicle
unloading areas, and berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent access
when standoff distance cannot be maintained.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
3,678 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: Construct an addition /alteration to the existing CSMS facility and
________
the infrastructure to support this facility as stated above. Location is on a
180 acre, ILARNG training site on Camp Lincoln. (Current Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
103
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Lincoln Training Site
Springfield, Illinois
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
ADD
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Add/Alt
179237
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
LS
QUANTITY
---
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
--Total
(219)
(219)
_________
438
REQUIREMENT:
The CSMS facility is required to maintain equipment and
____________
issue/turn-in for peacetime training and ensure the equipment is prepared for
mobilization. The CSMS is an ARNG TDA maintenance facility which provides
full-time DS and GS level support to the ILARNG . No other adequate facilities
are available to support the units. The 2001 ILARNG Master Plan has evaluated
and recommended that the CSMS should be rehabilitated.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The current facility is in poor condition, does not meet
__________________
current building codes or criteria, and is 1/2 the size authorized to support
the facility mission. The facilities size can not support the ILARNG’s Master
Plan.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
If the project is not approved, the present
_______________________
facility’s lack of adequate space will reduce maintenance efficiency, training
and mobilization readiness standards will continue to decline.
ADDITIONAL: This project complies with the scope and design criteria of
___________
National Guard Pamphlet 415-12 and Design Guide 415-2. The most similar DoD
standards for logistics facility construction do not address all of the
current criteria incorporated in the CSMS design and thus do not yield
accurate cost estimates. Therefore, state historical costs for construction of
like facilities were used to develop baseline unit cost and were adjusted for
size, fiscal year and location. This project has been coordinated with the
installation physical security plan, and all physical security measures are
included. All required antiterrorism protection measures are included.
Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been explored during
project development. This project is the only feasible option to meet the
requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and
Housing) certifies that this project has been considered for joint use
potential. The facility will be available for use by other components.
Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will
be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable
laws and Executive Orders.
PAGE NO. 104
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Lincoln Training Site
Springfield, Illinois
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
ADD
Combined Support Maintenance Shop Add/Alt
179237
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-build
(2)
OCT 2008
_________
65
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
SEP 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
429
_________
429
_________
429
_________
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: LTC RANDALL SCOTT
Phone Number: 217 761-3592
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 105
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 106
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Wichita East Readiness Center
INSNO= 20D50
COST INDEX
Wichita, Kansas
.91
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Wichita E., KS
4.00 miles Armory
1,932 m2 (20,792 SF)
1955
ARNG
Wichita W., KS
6.00 miles Armory
1,932 m2 (20,793 SF)
1955
ARNG
Wichita S., KS
8.00 miles Armory
3,346 m2 (36,019 SF)
1958
USAR
Wichita, KS
9.00 miles AFRC/AMSA
6,780 m2 (72,980 SF)
1998
USNR
Wichita, KS
8.00 miles NMCRC
3,755 m2 (40,416 SF)
1972
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
17141 Armed Forces Reserve Center
SCOPE
_____
11,327 m2
(121,921 SF)
($000)
______
43,000
START
CMPL
_____
____
OCT 2008 OCT 2010
0
(0 )
0
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
18 OCT 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
JOINT CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
21407
Field Maintenance Shop
5,366 m2
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(57,756 SF)
25,347
500
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 11 APR 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
85
85
9
9
75
75
1
1
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
674
674
112
112
562
562
PAGE NO. 107
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Wichita East Readiness Center
Wichita, Kansas
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
287TH SUSTAINMENT BDE (-)
HHB 1-161ST FA BN
DET 5, 1161ST FSC
DET 2, 731ST TRANS CO
DET 2, 778TH TRANS CO
RRC DET, REC CMD
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 20D50
UIC
______
X4MAA
P4DT0
PDEA2
PYCA2
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
63400GNG
06455ANG01
T00R&R
55727LNG
55739LNG
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
286
286
103
103
5
5
45
45
64
64
6 _______
6
_______
509
509
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
0
0
1
42
4
29
__________
ACTUAL
______
197
135
1
52
4
29
__________
TOTALS
76
418
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
108
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Wichita East Readiness Center
Wichita, Kansas
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Armed Forces Reserve Center
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
200063
43,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center
Energy Management Control Syste
Building Information Systems
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
Building Information Systems
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Steam And/Or Chilled Water Dist
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp( 1,708) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
11,327 ( 121,921)
--------------
UNIT COST
2,703
--------------
COST ($000)
33,258
(30,614)
(560)
(925)
(568)
(590)
(1)
6,928
(590)
(1,000)
(51)
(2,156)
(275)
(1,708)
(650)
(498)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
40,186
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
2,009
_________
SUBTOTAL
42,195
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
1,266
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
43,461
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
43,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $ 3,000 based on
actual construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed Armed Forces
Reserve Center of permanent masonry type construction, brick and concrete
block units with concrete floors, and standing seam or single membrane roof. A
two-story structure with mechanical and electrical equipment. Outside
supporting facilities include military and privately-owned vehicle parking,
fencing, sidewalks, exterior fire protection, outside lighting, access roads,
detached facility sign, wash platform and flagpole. Physical security measures
will be incorporated into design including maximum feasible standoff distance
from roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy
landscaping, and bollards to prevent access when standoff distance cannot be
maintained. Cost effective energy conserving features will be incorporated
into design, including energy management control systems and high efficiency
motors, lighting, and HVAC systems. Air conditioning: 380 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
20,533 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
7,336 m2
________
PROJECT: Construct a new 20,533 SM (21,020 SF) JAFRC facility and the
________
infrastructure to support this facility as stated above. Location is on a
45-acre, state-owned, KSARNG training site in Wichita, KS. (New Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
109
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Wichita East Readiness Center
Wichita, Kansas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Armed Forces Reserve Center
200063
REQUIREMENT:
This facility is required to house all elements of the 287th
____________
Sustainment Brigade, Headquarters and Headquarters Battery 1st Battalion 161st
Field Artillery, Detachment 5 of the 1161st Forward Support Company,
Detachment 2 of the 731st Transpiration Company, Detachment 2 of the 778th
Transportation Company, and Electronics Maintenance Company (-) 4th
Maintenance Battalion, USMCR. The center will provide the necessary
administrative, training and storage areas required to achieve proficiency in
required training tasks for 670 personnel. A 45-acre plus state-owned site is
available for this project.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The Armories currently housing the 287th Sustainment
__________________
Brigade, Headquarters and Headquarters Battery 1st Battalion 161st Field
Artillery, Detachment 5 of the 1161st Forward Support Company, Detachment 2 of
the 731st Transpiration Company, Detachment 2 of the 778th Transportation
Company, and Electronics Maintenance Company (-) 4th Maintenance Battalion are
inadequate. These facilities are 47, 47 and 57 years old respectively and have
been determined to be unfeasible for rehabilitation or expansion. The
facilities are inadequate due to a lack of adequate parking, storage,
administrative areas, bathrooms, locker rooms and training areas.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The units’ ability to meet their readiness,
_______________________
recruiting and retention, and training objectives will continue to be
adversely affected if the personnel are not provided with adequate facilities.
Delays in the funding of this project will force the continued use of
inadequate facilities and the present facilities’ deficiencies will continue
to negatively impact troop readiness and morale. The lack of proper and
adequate training, storage and administrative areas will continue to impair
the attainment of required mobilization readiness levels for all of the
National Guard and USMCR units assigned to these armories.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date............................... _________
OCT 2008
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR).... _________
65
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR).... _________
PAGE NO. 110
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Wichita East Readiness Center
Wichita, Kansas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Armed Forces Reserve Center
200063
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR).... _________
(e) Concept Complete Date........................... _________
JUN 2009
(f) Design Complete Date............................ _________
OCT 2010
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
5,283
_________
5,283
_________
3,522
_________
1,761
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
APR 2011
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
DEC 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: COL Clifford M. Silsby
Phone Number: 785 274-1130
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 111
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Wichita East Readiness Center
INSNO= 20D50
COST INDEX
Wichita, Kansas
.91
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
USNR
Wichita, KS
20.00 miles NMCRC
3,755 m2 (40,416 SF)
1972
USAR
Wichita, KS
15.00 miles AFRC/AMSA
6,780 m2 (72,980 SF)
1981
ARNG
Wichita, KS
15.00 miles Armory
3,346 m2 (36,019 SF)
1958
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
214
Field Maintenance Shop
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
_____
______
_____
____
5,366 m2
(57,756 SF)
24,000 OCT 2009 OCT 2010
0
(0 )
0
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
18
OCT 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 11 APR 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
PAGE NO. 112
60
60
0
0
60
0
60
60
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
0
0
0
0
DD
FORM
MAY 78
0
0
1390s1
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Wichita East Readiness Center
Wichita, Kansas
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 20D50
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
DET 1 HQ STARC, 69TH TROOP COMMAND
242D ENGINEER COMPANY
323RD MISSILE SUPPORT CO (CORPS)
DET 2, 731ST MEDIUM TRUCK COMPANY
HHS 1-161 FIELD ARTILLERY BATTALION
BTRY C 1-161 FIELD ARTILLERY BATTALION
CO A (-) 2-137 INFANTRY BATTALION
CO C (-) 2-137 INFANTRY BATTALION
CO D 2-137 INFANTRY BATTALION
DET 1, HHC 2-137 INFANTRY BATTALION
226TH ENGINEER COMPANY
UIC
______
W78EAA
WP7UAA
WPPSAA
WPDEA2
WP4DT0
WP4DC1
WPWHA0
WPWHC0
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
NGW8A1AA
05424LNG03
09428LNG02
06465LNG01
06465LNG01
07245LNG01
WXFDAA
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
28
44
66
96
125
65
46
46
50
94
41
37
111
91
111
105
113
108
96
86
134 _______
135
_______
921
907
Assigned/Authorized: 98%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
24
2
8
__________
ACTUAL
______
24
2
8
__________
TOTALS
34
34
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
PAGE NO.
113
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Wichita East Readiness Center
Wichita, Kansas
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Field Maintenance Shop
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
214
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
200090
24,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
OMS Building
Flammable Materials Facility
Controlled Waste Facility
Unheated Metal Storage Building
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp(
731) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
4,993
16.26
27.87
328.88
(
(
(
(
----------
UNIT COST
53,741)
175)
300)
3,540)
2,185
2,066
2,067
1,765
----------
COST ($000)
11,930
(10,909)
(34)
(58)
(581)
(218)
(130)
9,816
(593)
(1,531)
(5,466)
(153)
(731)
(442)
(900)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
21,746
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,087
_________
SUBTOTAL
22,833
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
685
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
23,518
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
24,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. The FMS consists of a maintenance facility
with three (3) maintenance workdays, one with overhead crane, plus
administrative, personnel, and work areas. Constructed of masonry block with
brick veneer, concrete floors, masonry block partitions with a Raised Seam or
single membrane roofing system. Supporting facilities include military and
customer vehicle parking, fencing, wash platform, fuel storage and dispensing
system, lube & inspection rack, load ramp, control waste handling facility,
sidewalks, outside lighting, and access roads. Physical security measures will
be incorporated into design including maximum feasible standoff distance from
roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas, berems, heavy landscaping,
and bollards to prevent access when standoff distance cannot be maintained.
Air conditioning: 45 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
5,366 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: A new maintenance facility to provide adequate organizational
________
maintenance support for vehicles and equipment supported by this maintenance
shop. Site of project will be on state land co-located with a new Readiness
Center. (Current Mission)
PAGE NO.
114
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Wichita East Readiness Center
Wichita, Kansas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Field Maintenance Shop
200090
REQUIREMENT:
A facility requirement is requested to permit efficient
____________
maintenance support at the organizational level to be performed on vehicles
authorized to the units which will be supported by this maintenance shop.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The individuals that will be working in this facility
__________________
currently work in an overcrowded and substandard maintenance shop. The
existing shop, located in Wichita, Kansas, was built in 1958 and is extremely
outdated. Since the existing facility was constructed, the missions have
changed creating an increase in equipment and maintenance requirements,
causing a severe lack of functional space. Renovating the existing building
would not be economical due to its condition and of property for expansion. In
addition, the existing facility would have to be completely altered and
repaired, which would be more costly since all of the offices, the latrine,
and the workdays are too small and deteriorating.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The present facility’s deficiencies will continue to
_______________________
negatively impact troop morale. The lack of proper and adequate maintenance,
training, storage and administrative areas will continue to impair the
attainment of the units’ required mobilization readiness levels.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the state physical
___________
security officer and no force protection/combating terrorism measures other
than those physical security measures required by regulations and design
guides for protecting Federal property are required. This project complies
with the scope and design criteria of National Guard Pamphlet 415-12 and
Design Guide 415-2. The most similar DoD standards for logistics facility
construction do not address all of the current criteria incorporated in the
Army National Guard Organizational Maintenance Shop (OMS) design and thus do
not yield accurate cost estimates. Therefore, state historical costs for
construction of like facilities were used to develop baseline unit cost and
were adjusted for size, fiscal year and location. Alternative methods of
meeting this requirement have been explored during project development. This
project is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that
this project has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be
available for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life
Cycle cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design,
development, and construction of the project in accordance with Executive
Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
OCT 2008
_________
65
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
PAGE NO. 115
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Wichita East Readiness Center
Wichita, Kansas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Field Maintenance Shop
200090
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(f) Design Complete Date............................ _________
OCT 2010
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
132
_________
2,328
_________
2,460
_________
1,640
_________
820
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: COL James Stewart
Phone Number: 785 274-1130
PAGE NO. 116
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Kentucky ARNG
INSNO= KYARNG
COST INDEX
Kentucky
.90
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
USAR
Fort Thomas, KY
15.00 miles USAR Reserve
3,346
(36,019 SF)
ARNG
Walton, KY
13.00 miles Readiness
1,532 m2 (16,487 SF)
1977
ARNG
Cincinnati,
15.00 miles Readiness
1,532 m2 (16,487 SF)
USAR
Cincinnati,
15.00 miles USAR Reserve
1,532 m2 (16,487 SF)
ARNG
Cincinnati,
15.00 miles Readiness
1,532 m2 (16,487 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
17180 Readiness Center
SCOPE
_____
8,249 m2
(88,793 SF)
($000)
______
19,500
START
CMPL
_____
____
OCT 2007 MAY 2009
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
17 OCT 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 15 SEP 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
15
12
5
2
10
9
0
1
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
402
0
34
0
368
0
PAGE NO. 117
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Kentucky ARNG
Kentucky
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= KYARNG
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
HHC AVN Support Battalion
Company A 1204th Aviation Support BN
UIC
______
WNG1G1
WNG1G2
TSPN ________
MTOE/TDA
____
7729 63316G100100
7729
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
220
220
182 _______
182
_______
402
402
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
51
22
1
__________
ACTUAL
______
51
22
1
__________
TOTALS
74
74
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
118
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Kentucky ARNG
Kentucky
Readiness Center
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
210034
19,500
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center
Flammable Materials Facility
Unheated Metal Storage Building
Emergency Power Generator Pad &
Controlled Waste Facility
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp(
326) Demo(
)
Information Systems
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
LS
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
7,468 (
23.23 (
730.31 (
-27.87 (
---------
UNIT COST
80,382)
250)
7,861)
300)
1,938
1,399
1,399
-1,399
---------
COST ($000)
16,215
(14,469)
(33)
(1,022)
(206)
(39)
(446)
2,036
(295)
(175)
(638)
(65)
(326)
(1)
(161)
(375)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
18,251
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
913
_________
SUBTOTAL
19,164
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
575
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
19,739
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
19,500
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $0.900 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed readiness center of
permanent masonry type construction, brick and concrete block units with
concrete floors, and a standing seam metal roof. A one-story structure with
mechanical and electrical equipment and prewired work stations. Outside
supporting facilities include military and privately-owned vehicle parking,
fencing, sidewalks, exterior fire protection, outside lighting, access roads,
detached facility sign, wash platform, fuel storage & dispensing system, and
flagpole. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design
including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and
vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent
access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy
conserving features will be incorporated into design, including energy
management control systems and high efficiency motors, lighting, and
Geothermal HVAC systems (cost included in Site Preparation costs). Air
conditioning: 42 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
8,221 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: A 3,500 SM (37,677 SF) Readiness center is required to adequately
________
provide the units housed in this facility with administrative, supply,
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
119
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Kentucky ARNG
Kentucky
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
210034
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
EMCS
Helipad
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
Building Information Systems
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
------
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
-----Total
(75)
(25)
(262)
(83)
(1)
_________
446
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
classroom, locker, latrine, and kitchen space.
(Current
Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The 940th Military Police Company is currently broken into a
____________
Company (-) located in Walton, KY, and a Detachment located in Lexington, KY.
This unit has an authorized strength of 182 people. The demographics of
Northern KY indicate a good location for an MP Company, and will support the
Northern KY-Cincinnati airport. Consolidation of the unit with its detachment
at this facility will alleviate space requirements created by Force
Modularization.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The current facility occupied by Det 1 940th lacks
__________________
administrative and training space. The facility also lacks proper restroom
facilities to support the female soldiers. The facility occupied by the
Company(-) is to be utilized by a new Signal Company created by Force
Modularization.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The units’ ability to meet its readiness, recruiting
_______________________
and retention, and training objectives will continue to be adversely affected
if the personnel are not provided with the proper facilities that they
critically need. The lack of proper and adequate administrative, classroom,
locker room, latrine, and storage areas is a training distracter.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
PAGE NO. 120
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Kentucky ARNG
Kentucky
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
210034
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
OCT 2007
_________
100
_________
_________
_________
FEB 2008
_________
MAY 2009
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
1,612
_________
1,612
_________
1,075
_________
537
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
DEC 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: LTC STEPHEN KING
Phone Number: 502 607-1765
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 121
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 122
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Louisiana ARNG
INSNO= LAARNG
COST INDEX
Louisiana
.98
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Alexandria, LA
15.00 miles miles
2,659 m2 (28,617 SF)
1985
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
2115
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft Sy
808 m2
(8,700 SF)
5,500 SEP 2009 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
14 APR 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
(Date)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 16 JUN 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
23
21
2
0
19
19
2
2
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
21
21
0
0
0
0
PAGE NO. 123
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Louisiana ARNG
Louisiana
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= LAARNG
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
CO B (MI) TUAV Platoon, BSTB 256 IBCT
UIC
______
WY2WB1
TSPN
____
14256
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
0 _______
0
_______
0
0
Assigned/Authorized: 0%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
AUTHORIZED
__________
10
8
__________
ACTUAL
______
10
8
__________
TOTALS
18
18
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
124
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Louisiana ARNG
Louisiana
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Fac
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
211
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
220222
5,500
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
TUAS Facility
Building Automation & Control
Building Information Systems
Energy Management Control Syste
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp(
543) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
808.26 (
------------
UNIT COST
8,700)
COST ($000)
2,368
------------
2,344
(1,914)
(100)
(125)
(80)
(65)
(60)
2,695
(160)
(1,746)
(34)
(543)
(165)
(47)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
5,039
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
252
_________
SUBTOTAL
5,291
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
159
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
5,450
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
5,500
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
A Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) building will be
constructed of prefabricated building construction, with masonry exterior,
drywall interior,concrete floors, and a metal roof located at Woodworth,
Louisiana. Primary facility in the will be a 106’ x 80’ building and a
flexible pavement runway, 1080’ long. Supporting facilities include military
and privately-owned vehicle parking, sidewalks, and outside lighting. Physical
security measures will be incorporated into design including maximum feasible
standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas,
berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent access when standoff
distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective, energy conserving features will
be incorporated into design, including energy management control systems and
high efficiency motors, lighting, and HVAC systems.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to provide an Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) Training
________
Facility, of prefabricated type construction to serve the training missions of
using units. The space will permit modern, cost-effective efficient training
and sustainment operations that will improve the using unit s readiness
posture. The site of the project is on federal land under long-term lease from
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
125
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Louisiana ARNG
Louisiana
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility
220222
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
the state. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The building and 1080 runway are required to provide office,
____________
training, and storage for the unmanned aerial vehicle and personnel assigned
to this unit.
CURRENT SITUATION:
There is no existing space at the airfield to house the
__________________
UAV or assigned personnel. The regornized unit will need a runway and training
space to properly train for the new mission. UAV must be operated in military
airspace and Woodworth, LA is only available authorized location in Louisiana.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The unit will lose valuable training time traveling
_______________________
to and from training area and will not be able to prepare for wartime
missions.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. An economic
analysis has been prepared and utilized in evaluating this project. This
project is the most cost-effective method to satisfy the requirement. The
Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies
that this project has been considered for joint use potential. Mission
requirements, operational considerations, and location are incompatible with
use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
(3)
PAGE NO. 126
SEP 2009
_________
35
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
($000)
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications.......... _________
(b) All Other Design Costs.......................... _________
453
(c) Total Design Cost............................... _________
453
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Louisiana ARNG
Louisiana
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility
220222
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(d) Contract........................................ _________
302
(e) In-house........................................ _________
151
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
JUL 2011
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
AUG 2011
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
FEB 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: LTC WILLIAM ALDRIDGE
Phone Number: 504-278-8293
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 127
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 128
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Camp Minden
INSNO= 2210A
COST INDEX
Minden, Louisiana
.96
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Camp Minden, LA
1.00 miles Unit Training & Eq
2,831 m2 (30,468 SF)
1970
ARNG
Bossier City, LA
15.00 miles Readiness Center
693 m2 (7,458 SF)
1979
ARNG
Shreveport, LA
15.00 miles Readiness Center
2,816 m2 (30,316 SF)
1940
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 Armed Forces Reserve Center
7,094 m2
(76,357 SF)
28,000 SEP 2007 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
14
OCT 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
JOINT CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
178
Modified Record Fire Range
5,366
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(57,756 SF)
4,000
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 06 NOV 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
4
4
0
0
3
3
1
1
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
274
276
9
10
265
266
PAGE NO. 129
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Minden
Minden, Louisiana
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 2210A
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
1083RD TRANSPORTATION COMPANY
UIC
______
WQJWAA
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
55739LNG01
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
274 _______
276
_______
274
276
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
TRAILERS
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
HEMTT PLS/HET
TOTALS
AUTHORIZED
__________
105
100
96
__________
ACTUAL *
______
105
0
96
__________
301
201
* Not all authorized vehicles assigned permanent parking at this facility; remaining vehicles
are assigned permanent parking at REMAINING VEHICLES ARE LOCATED AT UTES
.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
130
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Camp Minden
Minden, Louisiana
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Armed Forces Reserve Center
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
220114
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
28,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
QUANTITY
UNIT COST
COST ($000)
PRIMARY FACILITY
20,313
________________
Armed Forces Reserve Center
m2 (SF)
6,894 (
74,207)
2,799
(19,294)
Flammable Materials Storage Fac m2 (SF)
13.94 (
150)
2,367
(33)
Controlled Waste Facility
m2 (SF)
185.81 (
2,000)
2,153
(400)
Energy Management Control Syste LS
--(185)
SDD and EPAct05
LS
--(200)
Total from Continuation page
(201)
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
7,142
_____________________
Electric Service
LS
--(215)
Water, Sewer, Gas
LS
--(1,000)
Steam And/Or Chilled Water Dist LS
--(175)
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters LS
--(3,232)
Storm Drainage
LS
--(543)
Site Imp( 1,473) Demo(
)
LS
--(1,473)
Information Systems
LS
--(1)
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
--(149)
Other
LS
--(354)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
27,455
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,373
_________
SUBTOTAL
28,828
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
865
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
29,693
State Share
1,693
TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST
28,000
TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
28,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $2,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed readiness center of
permanent masonry type construction, brick and concrete block units with
concrete floors, and a built-up or single membrane roof. A one-story structure
with mechanical and electrical equipment and prewired work stations. Outside
supporting facilities include military and privately-owned vehicle parking,
fencing, sidewalks, exterior fire protection, outside lighting, access roads,
detached facility sign, wash platform, fuel storage & dispensing system, and
flagpole. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design
including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and
vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent
access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy
conserving features will be incorporated into design, including energy
management control systems and high efficiency motors, lighting, and HVAC
systems. Air conditioning: 35 tons.
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
131
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Minden
Minden, Louisiana
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Armed Forces Reserve Center
220114
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
Antiterrorism Measures
Building Information Systems
LS
LS
QUANTITY
---
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
--Total
(200)
(1)
_________
201
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
7,094 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to provide a 274-person readiness center of
________
permanent type construction to serve the peace time missions of the assigned
unit. The space will permit all personnel to perform the necessary tasks that
will improve the unit s readiness posture. The site of the project is on state
land.
(Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The requirement is to build more than 3,600 SM (396,000 SF) of
____________
readiness center primary and supporting space required to adequately provide
the units housed in this facility with administrative, supply, classroom,
locker, latrine, and kitchen space. Collectively within the readiness center
these areas will support the HET unit in IDT and annual training.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The individuals, assigned to this facility drill in an
__________________
overcrowded and substandard leased facility. Unit lacks dining facility space,
latrines, classroom, secure storage and numerous other critical training areas
like an assembly hall for formations/drills and indoor training sessions.
Training is less than adequate because facilities or building space is
non-existent.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The units’ ability to meet its readiness, recruiting
_______________________
and retention, and training objectives will continue to be adversely affected
if the personnel are not provided with the proper facilities that they
critically need. Retention of qualified/trained and dedicated soldiers will
decrease because of inadequate facilities which reflect less than desirable
quality of life standards.
ADDITIONAL: The most similar DoD standards do not address all of the current
___________
criteria incorporated in the (project type) design and thus do not yield
accurate cost estimates. Therefore, state historical costs for construction of
like facilities were used to develop baseline unit cost and were adjusted for
size, fiscal year and location. The reasons for joint use recommendation are
Demographic limitations indicate that area could not support the recruiting
and retention requirements of more than one Reserve Component.
This project has been coordinated with the installation
physical security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All
required antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods
of meeting this requirement have been explored during project development.
PAGE NO. 132
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Minden
Minden, Louisiana
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Armed Forces Reserve Center
220114
ADDITIONAL:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
This project is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that
this project has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be
available for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life
Cycle cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design,
development, and construction of the project in accordance with Executive
Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
SEP 2007
_________
35
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
FEB 2011
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
DEC 2011
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
85
_________
2,371
_________
2,456
_________
1,637
_________
819
_________
PAGE NO. 133
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Minden
Minden, Louisiana
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Armed Forces Reserve Center
220114
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (CONTINUED)
_______________________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: LTC Douglas Mouton
Phone Number: 504 278-8253
PAGE NO. 134
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
10
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
COST INDEX
.00
INSNO=
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Fifth Regiment, MD
7.00 miles Miles
2,816
(30,316 SF)
ARNG
Parkville, MD
7.00 miles Miles
2,816
(30,316 SF)
ARNG
Cade, MD
9.00 miles Miles
2,816
(30,316 SF)
ARNG
Gunpowder, MD
10.00 miles Miles
2,816
(30,316 SF)
ARNG
Towson, MD
10.00 miles Miles
2,816
(30,316 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
21115 Tactical Unmanned Aircraft Sy
921 m2
(9,916 SF)
5,500 JUL 2009 AUG 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
28
DEC 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 08 DEC 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
22
22
2
22
20
20
PAGE NO. 135
1. COMPONENT
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
10
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO=
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
DET 1 CO A 278TH MI CO (HBCT/IBCT)
UIC
______
WX4XA1
TSPN
____
18278
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
22 _______
22
_______
22
22
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
AUTHORIZED
__________
5
2
__________
ACTUAL
______
5
2
__________
TOTALS
7
7
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
136
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Maryland ARNG
Maryland
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Fac
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
211
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
240186
5,500
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
TUAS Facility
Building Information Systems
Energy Management Control Syste
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
391) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
921.23 (
-----
-------
UNIT COST
9,916)
COST ($000)
3,736
-----
-------
3,730
(3,442)
(79)
(69)
(69)
(71)
1,170
(75)
(75)
(380)
(391)
(141)
(108)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
4,900
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
245
_________
SUBTOTAL
5,145
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
154
DESIGN/BUILD - DESIGN COST
206
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
5,505
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
5,500
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
A specially designed UAV facility of permanent
type construction, with sloped standing metal seam roof, masonry walls,
concrete slab on grade floors and energy efficient mechanical and electrical
equipment with emergency power generator backup. Supporting facilities will
include military vehicle parking, asphalt runway, access roads, POV parking,
security fencing and motor pool lighting, flammable materials storage
building, controlled waste handling facility, and sidewalks. Extension of gas,
electric, sewer, water and communication utilities to the building site will
be necessary. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design
including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and
vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent
access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy
conserving features will be incorporated into design.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to provide an Unmanned Aerial System (UAS) Training
________
Facility, of concrete masonry type construction to serve the training missions
of the using unit. The space will permit modern, cost-effective, energy
efficent training and sustainment operations that will improve the using units
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
137
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Maryland ARNG
Maryland
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility
240186
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
readiness posture. (New Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
This facility shall support all administrative and training
____________
functions for the UAS unit with adequate classrooms and administrative spaces
which supports all manner of training and operations for homeland security,
antiterrorism and force protection.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The TUAS platoon currently houses their equipment and
__________________
trains out of space that is leased, and is of temporary construction.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Unit will be required to continue to work out of a
_______________________
temporary facility. This will affect the ability of the unit to train and meet
readiness requirements and effect the unit’s moral.
ADDITIONAL: Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been
___________
explored during project development. This project is the only feasible option
to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Installations and Housing) certifies that this project has been considered
for joint use potential. Mission requirements, operational considerations, and
location are incompatible with use by other components.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-build
(2)
JAN 2009
_________
35
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
AUG 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
JUN 2011
PAGE NO. 138
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
($000)
_________
166
_________
166
_________
_________
166
_________
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Maryland ARNG
Maryland
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility
240186
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
JUN 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: LTC ROBERT McCABE
Phone Number: 410-576-6067
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 139
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 140
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Hanscom Readiness Center
INSNO= 25A20
COST INDEX
Bedford, Massachusetts
1.13
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
USAF
HANSCOM, MA
.00 miles
2,816
(30,316 SF)
ARNG
LEXINGTON, MA
4.00 miles MILES
2,816
(30,316 SF)
ARNG
BEDFORD, MA
5.00 miles MILES
2,816
(30,316 SF)
ARNG
CONCORD, MA
8.00 miles MILES
2,816
(30,316 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17142 JFHQ Addition
7,406 m2
(79,720 SF)
23,000 SEP 2009 AUG 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
01
DEC 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
400
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 08 OCT 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
350
350
83
83
167
167
100
100
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
392
396
176
170
216
216
PAGE NO. 141
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Hanscom Readiness Center
Bedford, Massachusetts
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 25A20
UIC
______
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
0 _______
0
_______
0
0
Assigned/Authorized: 0%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
ACTUAL
______
54
__________
TOTALS
54
54
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
142
AUTHORIZED
__________
54
__________
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Hanscom Readiness Center
Bedford, Massachusetts
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
JFHQ Addition
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
250136
23,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center Addition
IT/Telecommuications
Energy Management Control Syste
Anti-Terrorism/Force Protection
SDD_EPAct05
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp( 1,784) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
7,406 (
-----
-------
UNIT COST
79,720)
2,170
-----
COST ($000)
17,834
(16,073)
(750)
(337)
(337)
(337)
-------
3,165
(50)
(100)
(339)
(1,784)
(357)
(535)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
20,999
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,050
_________
SUBTOTAL
22,049
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
661
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
22,710
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
23,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
A specially designed addition to the Joint Forces
Headquarters. The addition will be of permanent masonry type construction,
with standing seam roof, concrete floors and mechanical and electrical
equipment with emergency power generator backup. Administrative positions for
the USPFO will be located at this site with the warehouse located at an
existing site in Ayer, MA. Supporting facilities will include military vehicle
parking, access roads, POV parking, security fencing, dark motor pool
lighting, flammable materials storage, controlled waste handling facility, and
sidewalks. Extension of gas, electric, sewer, water and communication
utilities will be necessary. Actual foundation design will be determined
during design. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design
including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and
vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent
access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy
conserving features will be incorporated into design and standard HVAC/MEP
systems commissioning will be included.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to construct a Joint Force Headquarters of permanent
________
type construction to serve the Federal and State mission of the MA National
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
143
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Hanscom Readiness Center
Bedford, Massachusetts
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
JFHQ Addition
250136
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
Guard. The functional space will permit all personnel to perform the necessary
tasks that will improve and sustain the MA National Guard’s readiness posture.
The proposed project site is on federal land owned by the Air Force, permitted
to the Army and licensed to the MA National Guard. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The addition to the Joint Force Headquarters is required to
____________
house all elements of the MA Joint Force Headquarters, USPFO, and Recruiting
and Retention Command. The facility will support all necessary administrative,
training, and storage areas required to achieve and sustain proficiency in
required tasks of the TDA and full time force. A licensed site is available
for this project.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The JFHQ and Recruiting and Retention Command are
__________________
currently sharing a renovated computer manufacturing building. This facility,
not being designed to support a JFHQ is not situated to support the needs of
the JFHQ without extensive renovations.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The units’ ability to meet its readiness, recruiting
_______________________
and retention, and training objectives will be adversely affected if the
personnel are not provided with an adequate and functional facility. Delays in
the funding of this project will force the use of funds to renovate existing
space in existing facilities. Deficiencies in required functional space will
negatively impact troop readiness and morale due to commands being disbursed
amongst buildings while other directorates will be operating in cramped
inefficient space.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility is Joint with the
Air National Guard and will be available for use by other components.
Sustainable principles will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423 and other
applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
PAGE NO. 144
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FEB 2009
_________
15
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
AUG 2010
_________
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Hanscom Readiness Center
Bedford, Massachusetts
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
JFHQ Addition
250136
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
1,890
_________
1,890
_________
1,260
_________
630
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name:
Phone Number:
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 145
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 146
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Camp Grayling Maneuver Training Cent
INSNO= 26B15
COST INDEX
Grayling, Michigan
1.11
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal training operations twenty-four weekends per year and for annual training up to fifteen weeks a
year. It will also be used for one full week when training mobilizing units.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
GRAYLING, MI
5.00 miles Miles
2,816
(30,316 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17901 Combined Arms CollectiveTrain
7 ST
(7 ST)
19,000 OCT 2008 JUL 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
16 FEB 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
178
178
721
178
721
178
Urban Assault Course
Live Fire Shoot House
ORTC Barracks
Infantry Squad Battle Course
ORTC Barracks
Light Demolition Range
5,366
5,366
5,366
5,366
5,366
5,366
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(57,756
(57,756
(57,756
(57,756
(57,756
(57,756
SF)
SF)
SF)
SF)
SF)
SF)
2,600
3,000
19,000
3,000
17,000
2,000
500
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 07 FEB 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
67
67
21
21
46
46
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
8,990
8,599
873
873
8,117
7,726
PAGE NO. 147
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Grayling Maneuver Training Cent
Grayling, Michigan
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
ALL MICHIGAN ARMY NATIONAL GUARD UNITS
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 26B15
UIC
______
WQAAA
TSPN ________
MTOE/TDA
____
33579 19677LNG13
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
8,990 _______
8,599
_______
8,990
8,599
Assigned/Authorized: 95%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
ACTUAL
______
0
__________
TOTALS
0
0
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
148
AUTHORIZED
__________
0
__________
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Camp Grayling Maneuver Training CenterGrayling, Michigan
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
Combined Arms Collective Training Fac
7.PROJECT NUMBER
179
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
260207
19,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
MAC/UAC-Valut & Fight
MAC/UAC-Clearing Techniques Bui
MAC/UAC-Grenadier Gunnery
MAC/UAC-Destiny Doorway
MAC/UAC-Dodge City
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp(
752) Demo(
)
Other
QUANTITY
UNIT COST
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
------
------
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
-------
-------
COST ($000)
15,686
(45)
(90)
(25)
(50)
(75)
(15,401)
1,883
(105)
(30)
(511)
(85)
(752)
(400)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
17,569
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
878
_________
SUBTOTAL
18,447
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
553
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
19,000
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
19,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,200 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. Construct a permanent, standard design MOUT
site consisting of a Military Operations Urban Terrain Assault Course/Urban
Assault Course (MAC/UAC), and a Collective Training Facility (CTF). The
MAC/UAC, is used for individual, team/squad, and platoon training, comprise of
seven MAC/UAC stations. Five stations will be live fire and shall border an
impact area and be separated by earth berms. The urban defense building and
sewer trainer will be part of the MAC but will not be live fire. The live fire
stations and number of M31A1 target mechanisms are: vault and fight (3
targets), clearing techniques building (3 targets), grenadier gunnery (3
targets), destiny doorway (2 targets), and dodge city (6 targets). The CTF
will utilize force-on-force MILES engagement system and will consist of
approximately 33 MOUT training buildings (all will be intact, except over 10
rubbleized to varying degrees), crushed aggregate roads, an access road,
parking area, underground sewer network, and other supporting features
required to replicate an urban setting. CTF structures will be of reinforced
concrete masonry unit construction and one to three stories high. Structures
will have stairways, loop holes, mouse holes, and will be designed and
constructed to accommodate attachment of rappelling ropes. Partial basements
will be included in two buildings (one rubble and one intact.) Electricity
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
149
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Grayling Maneuver Training Cent
Grayling, Michigan
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Arms Collective Training Facility
260207
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
MAC/UAC-Defense Tasks Trainer
MAC/UAC-Sewer Trainer
CTF Buildings-3 Story (Hotel, A
CTF Buildings-2 Story (School,
CTF Buildings-1 Story (Warehous
Control Tower
Underground Trainer
Bridge Site/Gap
Concrete Bridge
SDD and EPAct05
LS
LS
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
Unit
COST
QUANTITY
4,537
7,682
2,238
46.45
--(
(
(
(
-----
48,832)
82,688)
24,086)
500)
Cost
($000)
-(75)
-(75)
1,076
(4,883)
968.75
(7,442)
1,023
(2,288)
1,884
(88)
-(125)
-(125)
-(100)
-(200)
_________
Total
15,401
DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED CONSTRUCTION: (CONTINUED)
__________________________________________________
will be intact in the street lights and in the warehouse and wireless video
and targetry control systems will be incorporated into the targetry and video
feedback systems. The protected target mechanisms will be actuated from
observer stations. The MAC structures will be of wood construction. Insulation
for the MAC is not required since none of the structures require heating or
air conditioning. The complex is not sited on a flood plain. This project will
be designed in accordance with Huntsville Design Guide HNDM-1110-1-7. The MOUT
site will be located on Camp Grayling Maneuver Training Center, utilizing
pre-existing force protection measures. Additional force protection measures
will be incorporated in the design as appropriate, to include elevated berms
and vehicle bollards.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project will provide the necessary facilities for military
________
police and infantry to receive proficiency training in MOUT tactics and to
certify for mobilization. (New Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
This project is required to provide facilities for training
____________
units of the Michigan Army and Air National Guard in tactics and techniques
required for MOUT operations under simulated combat conditions. As more of the
world becomes urban in nature, the need for members and units of the United
States military to become proficient in military operations in urban areas
becomes critical. A facility of this type is necessary for both individual and
small unit training, since MOUT operations are characterized by
semi-independent actions by small units to accomplish the methodical clearance
of assigned zones.
CURRENT SITUATION:
At present, there are not any existing facilities in the
__________________
Michigan National Guard for troops to acquire and maintain the proficiency
PAGE NO. 150
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Grayling Maneuver Training Cent
Grayling, Michigan
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Arms Collective Training Facility
260207
CURRENT SITUATION:
(CONTINUED)
________________________________
required in MOUT operations. Michigan has recently added two military police
units to its force structure, one of which was an artillery battalion
converted to Military Police, the other unit an MP Command. With the
additional MP units in the state’s force structure their is a greater need for
exposure to MOUT training, and these units and others, are in dire need of
this type of facility. With the growing threat of urbanized combat this MOUT
site will be a critical training tool and will allow for a more controlled and
realistic environment to train our soldiers for urban warfare. The closest
type of MOUT training site like this is over 180 miles away at Fort Custer
Training Center. An original MAC design was already prepared for Fort Custer
Training, however the design and this proposal would require site adaptation
of the existing design. This proposed site would be within 2 hours driving
time of a majority of the units in the Michigan Army National Guard.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The unit’s ability to meet its readiness, combat
_______________________
preparedness and training objectives will continue to be adversely affected if
the personnel are not provided with the proper facilities that they critically
need.
ADDITIONAL: This project complies with the scope and design criteria of
___________
National Guard Pamphlet 415-12 dated 30 April 2007, Design Guide 415-4, and
HNDM 1110-1-7. The most similar DoD standards for range design, costing, and
construction do not address the current methodology incorporated in the Army
National Guard range designs and thus do not yield accurate cost estimates.
Therefore, State historical costs for design and construction of like
facilities were used to develop baseline unit cost and were adjusted for size,
fiscal year and location. This project has been coordinated with the
installation physical security plan, and all physical security measures are
included. All required antiterrorism protection measures are included.
Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been explored during
project development. This project is the only feasible option to meet the
requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and
Housing) certifies that this project has been considered for joint use
potential. The facility will be available for use by other components.
Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will
be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable
laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
OCT 2008
_________
35
_________
_________
_________
PAGE NO. 151
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Grayling Maneuver Training Cent
Grayling, Michigan
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Arms Collective Training Facility
260207
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(e) Concept Complete Date........................... _________
JUN 2009
(f) Design Complete Date............................ _________
OCT 2010
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
3,328
_________
3,328
_________
1,252
_________
2,076
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
FEB 2011
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
MAR 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: COL DWIGHT MICKELSEN
Phone Number: 517 481-7560
PAGE NO. 152
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Arden Hills Army Training Site
INSNO= 27670
COST INDEX
Arden Hills, Minnesota
1.09
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Anoka, MN
10.00 miles Readiness Center
1,391 m2 (14,972 SF)
1954
ARNG
Brooklyn Park, MN
25.00 miles Readiness Center
2,316 m2 (24,925 SF)
1986
ARNG
Roseville, MN
10.00 miles Readiness Center
3,718 m2 (40,017 SF)
1935
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
21407 Field Maintenance Shop
11,025 m2
(118,677 SF)
29,000 OCT 2008 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
11
OCT 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
178
178
178
171
178
171
Infantry Squad Battle Course
Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Range
Scout Recon Range
Readiness Center
Infantry Platoon Battle Course
Readiness Center
5,366
5,366
5,366
5,366
5,366
5,366
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(57,756
(57,756
(57,756
(57,756
(57,756
(57,756
SF)
SF)
SF)
SF)
SF)
SF)
3,800
8,000
18,000
17,020
3,800
14,136
545
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 01 OCT 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
2,563
2,905
410
383
2,153
2,522
PAGE NO. 153
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Arden Hills Army Training Site
Arden Hills, Minnesota
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 27670
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
834TH DASB
147TH FIN BN
JOINT FORCES HEADQUARTERS (JFHQ)(-)
HHC 1ST BDE, 34TH ID
798TH TRANS DET MVNT CONTROL
135 PAD DET 1
147TH PSB
347TH PSC
BATTERY F, 1/151ST FA
2/147TH AVN BN
HHC AVN BDE
UIC
______
WPJPAA
WTGYAA
W8AEA5
WPUFAA
WVMUAA
WQE5A1
WPULAA
WQQJAA
WPD6AA
WUAUAA
WTSZAA
TSPN
____
3034
31137
56751
3034
35522
34500
31206
31137
3034
3034
3034
MTOE/TDA
________
63315ANG07
14426LNG02
NGW78MAA
87042LNG02
55506LNG01
45413LNG08
12426LNG02
12427LNG01
06457ANG01
01305ANG01
01302ANG01
1256 MED CO (AA)
E-TAB 1/151ST FA
134TH FSB, 34TH ID
1/216TH ADA BN (-)
247TH FIN DET
HHB (DET 1) 1/125TH FA
HHB 34TH DIVARTY
CO A (DET 2) 2/136TH IN BN
TROOP G, 113 CAV
WP17Y1
WCV2AA
WQC598
WPL2AA
WQUJ90
WPU1T1
WPUJAA
WPUZA
WPT2A
30828
3034
31137
3034
32002
3034
3034
3034
31137
08441LNG03
06303LNG04
63005LNG02
44423ANG02
14423LNG01
06302LNG02
06302LNG02
07245LNG10
1708FNG02
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
214
60
343
82
7
11
28
47
97
247
100
304
62
384
105
7
7
36
55
101
290
116
34
49
76
86
416
601
433
343
21
19
98
74
152
132
50
87
47 _______
48
_______
2,563
2,906
Assigned/Authorized: 113%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
704
469
73
113
71
35
__________
ACTUAL
______
704
469
73
113
71
35
__________
TOTALS
1,465
1,465
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
154
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Arden Hills Army Training Site
Arden Hills, Minnesota
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Field Maintenance Shop
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
214
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
270202
29,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Field Maintenance Shop
Flammable Materials Facility
Controlled Waste Facility
Unheated Metal Storage Building
Energy Management Control Syste
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp( 1,838) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
10,268
23.23
46.45
687.48
UNIT COST
( 110,527)
(
250)
(
500)
(
7,400)
--
1,844
1,272
1,375
1,272
--
--------
--------
COST ($000)
20,666
(18,934)
(30)
(64)
(875)
(256)
(507)
6,328
(35)
(37)
(4,014)
(40)
(1,838)
(269)
(95)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
26,994
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,350
_________
SUBTOTAL
28,344
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
850
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
29,194
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
29,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $3,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. Consists of a specially designed maintenance
facility with 20 (32’x64’) maintenance work bays, electronics work bay, Fire
finder Radar Facility (5-bay), warm-up bays, wash and steam bays,
administrative, personnel, and work areas. Constructed of masonry block with
brick veneer, concrete floors, masonry block partitions with a built-up or
single membrance roofing system. Supporting facilities include military and
POV/customer parking, fencing, load ramp, flammable materials storage (FMS),
controlled waste handling facility (CWHF), unheated storage building,
sidewalks, and curbing, outside lighting, access roads and utilities.
Anti-terrorism/force protection (AT/FP) and physical security measures will be
incorporated into design including maximum feasible standoff distance from
roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping,
and bollards to prevent access when standoff distance cannot be maintained.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
11,026 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
2,017 m2
________
PROJECT: A new maintenance facility to provide adequate organizational
________
maintenance support for vehicles and equipment supported by this maintenance
shop. Site of project will be on Federal land. (Current Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
155
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Arden Hills Army Training Site
Arden Hills, Minnesota
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Field Maintenance Shop
270202
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
LS
QUANTITY
---
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
--Total
(404)
(103)
_________
507
REQUIREMENT:
A facility requirement for (118,677 SF) is requested to permit
____________
efficient maintenance support at the organizational level to be performed on
vehicles authorized to the units which will be supported by this maintenance
shop.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing facilities are overcrowded and substandard
__________________
(19 - 20x36 work bays that have no lift capability) for a modern vehicle
maintenance shop and have very little or no quality of life features, i.e
latrine/shower/locker room, physical fitness, laundry, or break/assembly
areas. The existing shop was constructed in 1974 and is extremely outdated.
Since the facility was constructed, the supported units have changed, their
equipment has changed (wheels to tracked vehicles), the maintenance
requirements subsequently changed, which in turn creates a severe shortage in
many functional spaces. Note: Constructing an addition, altering or renovating
the existing buildings would not be economical due to their site restrictions
and the overall age/condition of the facilities.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The present facility’s deficiencies will continue to
_______________________
negatively impact troop morale and the lack of proper and adequate
maintenance, training, storage and administrative areas will continue to
impair the attainment of the units’ required mobilization readiness levels.
Also, the outdoor vehicle wash rack does not meet Metropolitan Council for
Environmental Services (MCES) Rules Article IV or 40 CFR Part 403.5
pretreatment standards. Facility oil-water separators do not meet MCES
pretreatment standards. Parking facility for approximately 1,500 vehicles does
not provide proper spill containment.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
PAGE NO. 156
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Arden Hills Army Training Site
Arden Hills, Minnesota
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Field Maintenance Shop
270202
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
OCT 2008
_________
65
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
2,706
_________
2,706
_________
2,706
_________
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
JAN 2011
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
JAN 2013
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: COL BRUCE JENSEN
Phone Number: 320 616-2602
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 157
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 158
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Camp Ripley
INSNO= 27B40
COST INDEX
Little Falls, Minnesota
1.09
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
To be used 48 of 52 weekends annually for inactive duty training and 42 weeks per year for units
conducting annual training.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
Brainerd, MN
23.00 miles 100-Person Armory
3,457 m2 (37,211 SF)
1988
Long Prairie, MN
33.00 miles 100-Person Armory
1,467 m2 (15,790 SF)
1920
St. Cloud, MN
37.00 miles 300-Person Armory
2,457 m2 (26,447 SF)
1960
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17894 Infantry Squad Battle Course
5
(5 )
4,300 AUG 2006 JUN 2007
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
01
OCT 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 01 JUL 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
150
162
23
18
127
144
PAGE NO. 159
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Ripley
Little Falls, Minnesota
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
ACT CAMP RIPLEY TNG S
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 27B40
UIC
______
W7Q8AA
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
0
0
0
0
150
150
0
0
0
0
0 _______
0
_______
150
150
66755
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
AUTHORIZED
__________
85
23
2
__________
ACTUAL
______
1
23
0
__________
TOTALS
110
24
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
160
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Camp Ripley
Little Falls, Minnesota
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Infantry Squad Battle Course
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
178
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
270096
4,300
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Moving Armor Target Emplacement
Moving Infantry Target Emplacem
Stationary Armor Target Emplace
Stationary Infantry Target Empl
Machine Gun Bunker
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Storm Drainage
Site Imp( 1,749) Demo(
)
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
LS
LS
QUANTITY
1
6
6
20
5
UNIT COST
------
109,000
11,000
6,300
2,100
15,000
---
---
COST ($000)
2,230
(109)
(66)
(38)
(42)
(75)
(1,900)
1,764
(15)
(1,749)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
3,994
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
200
_________
SUBTOTAL
4,194
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
126
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
4,320
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
4,300
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(1,002)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Construct an Infantry Squad Battle Course (ISBC)
that incorporates a Convoy Live Fire Lane (CLFL). The ISBC consists of five
wartime objectives: troops in the open, machine gun emplacements, observation
stations, trenches, and mortar emplacements. The CLFL consists of five miles
of roadway with various obstacles, bridges, overpasses, snipers, etc. that
convoys encounter in a hostile environment. The CLFL will include a Control
point on the east side, and two ambush points along the roadway. Supporting
facilities will include the range operations center, latrines, a target
storage building, after action review building, and the associated
electrical/data cabling. This range is intended to provide live fire training
using personal and squad weapons up to 50 caliber, M2 machine guns. Targetry
will be funded by Other Procurement, Army (OPA). Air Conditioning: 3 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: A 5-station Infantry Squad Battle Course (ISBC) for the soldiers and
________
units training on the tasks associated with the basic dismounted infantry
tactics of offense, defense and retrograde operations. (Current Mission)
(Current Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
161
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Ripley
Little Falls, Minnesota
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Infantry Squad Battle Course
270096
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
Trench
Downrange Power Center Emplacem
Downrange Electrical Cabling
Downrange Data Cabling
Range Operations Building
Operations Storage Building
Bleacher Enclosure
Ammunition Breakdown Building
Latrine (added to the ROC)
RF Taget &Battery Maintenance
Bleacher Enclosure
Range Flag
SDD and EPAct05
m
EA
m
m
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
EA
LS
(LF)
(LF)
(LF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
Unit
COST
QUANTITY
152.40
4
3,658
9,144
74.32
74.32
49.80
22.30
33.82
77.67
55.74
1
(
-(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
(
---
500)
12,000)
30,000)
800)
800)
536)
240)
364)
836)
600)
Cost
($000)
1,690
(258)
30,600
(122)
65.62
(240)
45.93
(420)
2,809
(209)
1,744
(130)
1,241
(62)
2,744
(61)
2,798
(95)
2,745
(213)
1,195
(67)
2,500
(3)
-(20)
_________
Total
1,900
REQUIREMENT:
This project is required to comply with the Training and
____________
Doctrine Command approved urban operations training strategy. The tasks
conducted on this range are critical to the survival and success of soldiers
in today s contemporary operating environment. The ISBC is a range where
dismounted infantry soldiers/squads can conduct training exercises in offense,
defense and retrograde that incorporate the critical training maneuvers of
ambush, movement to contact, attack, raid, retrograde, defend, and
reconnaissance/security. The soldiers, squads, and platoons will train to
standard on the tasks necessary to make them successfull on the contempory
(Urban) battle field.
CURRENT SITUATION:
Currently Camp Ripley does not have a standard Infantry
__________________
Squad Battle Course (ISBC). The existing range design and targetry are
inadequate to effectively train urban battle course skills. Completion of this
project will provide the training site with the ability to schedule additional
training units while meeting the readiness training requirements of it’s
current habitual training units.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The soldiers and units scheduled for deploy will
_______________________
have to spend additional time at the mobilization stations in order to receive
adequate training on the tasks necessary to successfully operate in a
contempory (Urban) combat environment. Currently soldiers can only get this
training at a very few sites throughout the country. The units that have
established a habitual training relationship with Camp Ripley will continue to
train on substandard facilities that don’t meet current doctrinal standards.
This will negatively impact their ability to accomplishment all of their
Readiness Training objectives.
PAGE NO. 162
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Ripley
Little Falls, Minnesota
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Infantry Squad Battle Course
270096
ADDITIONAL: This project complies with the scope and design criteria of
___________
National Guard Pamphlet (Draft) 415-12 dated July 2003, Design Guide 415-4,
dated 15 April 1994, and CEHND 1110-1-19. The most similar DoD standards for
range design, costing, and construction do not address the current methodology
incorporated in the Army National Guard range designs and thus do not yield
accurate cost estimates. Therefore, State historical costs for design and
construction of like facilities were used to develop baseline unit cost and
were adjusted for size, fiscal year and location This project has been
coordinated with the installation physical security plan, and all physical
security measures are included. All required antiterrorism protection measures
are included. Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been
explored during project development. This project is the only feasible option
to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Installations and Housing) certifies that this project has been considered
for joint use potential. The facility will be available for use by other
components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective
practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and construction
of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and
other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
AUG 2006
_________
65
_________
_________
_________
NOV 2006
_________
JUN 2007
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
_________
342
_________
342
_________
342
_________
_________
PAGE NO. 163
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Ripley
Little Falls, Minnesota
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Infantry Squad Battle Course
270096
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
NOV 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
JUL 2011
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
Stationary Infantry Targets
Range Control Station
Precision/Human Urban Targets
Automation Systems/Cameras
Moving Infantry Target Systems
Stationary Armor Target Systems
ROC and AAR Furniture
OPA
OPA
OPA
OPA
OPA
OPA
OPA
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
2011
TOTAL
40
70
20
742
60
20
50
______
1,002
CFMO Name: LTC Jama Davidson
Phone Number: 320 616-2602
PAGE NO. 164
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Camp Ripley
INSNO= 27B40
COST INDEX
Little Falls, Minnesota
1.09
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
ST. CLOUD, MN
37.00 miles MILES
2,457
(26,447 SF)
ARNG
ST. CLOUD, MN
37.00 miles MILES
2,457
(26,447 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
21115 Tactical Unmanned Aircraft Sy
1,074 m2
(11,560 SF)
4,450 OCT 2008 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
09 OCT 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 30 DEC 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
0
4
0
0
0
4
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
56
82
5
1
51
81
PAGE NO. 165
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Ripley
Little Falls, Minnesota
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
BN BRIGADE SPECIAL TR
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 27B40
UIC
______
WX43A0
TSPN ________
MTOE/TDA
____
30134 87305GNG03
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
56 _______
82
_______
56
82
Assigned/Authorized: 146%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
AUTHORIZED
__________
5
3
__________
ACTUAL
______
5
1
__________
TOTALS
8
6
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
166
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Camp Ripley
Little Falls, Minnesota
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Fac
6.CATEGORY CODE
05005896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
211
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
270267
4,450
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
TUAS Facility
Building Information System
Energy Management Control Syste
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
300) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
1,074 (
-----
-------
UNIT COST
11,560)
COST ($000)
2,538
-----
-------
3,005
(2,725)
(30)
(85)
(82)
(83)
1,129
(35)
(60)
(530)
(300)
(103)
(101)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
4,134
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
207
_________
SUBTOTAL
4,341
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
130
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
4,471
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
4,450
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Cost adjustment of $0.05 is based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. An Unmanned Aircraft Vehicle (UAV) building
will be constructed of concrete masonry exterior, drywall interior, concrete
floors, and a metal roof located at Camp Ripley, Minnesota. Primary facility
will be a 135’ x 115’ building and a flexible pavement runway, 1080’ long.
Supporting facilities include military and privately-owned vehicle parking,
sidewalks, and outside lighting. Physical security measures will be
incorporated into design, including maximum feasible standoff distance from
roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping,
and bollards to prevent access when standoff distance cannot be maintained.
Cost effective, energy conserving features will be incorporated into design,
including energy management control systems and high efficiency motors,
lighting, and HVAC systems.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to provide an Unmanned Aircraft Vehicle (UAV)
________
Training Facility, of concrete masonry type construction to serve the training
missions of the using units. The space will permit modern, cost-effective,
energy efficent training and sustainment operations that will improve the
using units readiness posture. The site of the project is on state land. (New
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
167
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Ripley
Little Falls, Minnesota
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility
270267
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
A 11560 SF building and 1080’ runway are required to provide
____________
office, training, and storage space for the unmanned aerial vehicle and
personnel assigned to this unit.
CURRENT SITUATION:
There is no existing space at the airfield to house the
__________________
UAV or the assigned personnel. The unit will need a runway and training space
to properly train for the new mission. The UAV must be operated in military
"restricted" airspace and Camp Ripley has the only airspace available in
Minnesota.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The unit will lose valuable training time traveling
_______________________
to and from training area and will not be able to prepare for wartime
missions.
ADDITIONAL: Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been
___________
explored during project development. This project is the only feasible option
to meet this requirement. Sustainable principles will be integrated into the
design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with
Executive Order 13123 and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
OCT 2008
_________
65
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
PAGE NO. 168
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
($000)
_________
373
_________
373
_________
124
_________
249
_________
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Ripley
Little Falls, Minnesota
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Tactical Unmanned Aircraft System Facility
270267
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(5) Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: COL BRUCE JENSEN
Phone Number: 320-616-2602
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 169
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 170
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Lincoln 1776 Readiness Center
INSNO= 31A95
COST INDEX
Lincoln, Nebraska
.97
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
This facility will be utilized on a daily basis for unit administration activities and at least two (2)
weekends a month for unit training.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
LINCOLN, NE
4.00 miles READINESS CENTER
1,069 m2 (11,507 SF)
1971
ARNG
LINCOLN, NE
4.00 miles READINESS CENTER
6,088 m2 (65,532 SF)
1957
ARNG
LIMCOLN, NE
6.00 miles READINESS CENTER
1,468 m2 (15,801 SF)
1962
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 READINESS CENTER ADDITION/ALT
2,218 m2
(23,874 SF)
3,300 FEB 2009 MAR 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
23
MAY 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 01 OCT 2007
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
75
75
10
10
65
65
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
162
162
49
49
113
113
PAGE NO. 171
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Lincoln 1776 Readiness Center
Lincoln, Nebraska
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
HHC 67TH BfSB
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 31A95
UIC
______
WPRNAA
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
49102G000
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
162 _______
162
_______
162
162
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
40
25
0
1
0
0
__________
ACTUAL
______
40
25
0
1
0
0
__________
TOTALS
66
66
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
175
B. WATER POLLUTION
100
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
100
PAGE NO.
172
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Lincoln 1776 Readiness Center
Lincoln, Nebraska
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
ALT
Readiess Center Add/Alt
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
310110
3,300
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center Alteration
Energy Management Control Syste
Building Information Systems
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
94) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
2,218 (
-----
-----
UNIT COST
23,874)
COST ($000)
947.22
-----
-----
2,423
(2,101)
(66)
(140)
(66)
(50)
613
(205)
(94)
(48)
(266)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
3,036
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
152
_________
SUBTOTAL
3,188
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
96
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
3,284
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
3,300
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
A specially renovated Readiness Center of
permanent masonry type construction, with standing seam roof, concrete floors
and mechanical and electrical equipment with emergency power generator backup.
Supporting facilities will include weapons cleaning, maintenance, issue,
turn-in sheds, military vehicle parking and access roads and POV parking,
security fencing and dark motor pool lighting, flammable materials storage
building, controlled waste handling facility, and sidewalks. Extension of gas,
electric, sewer, water and communication utilities to the building site will
not be necessary. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design
including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and
vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent
access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy
conserving features will be incorporated into design and standard HVAC/MEP.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is a proposed renovation of a federally-owned, former
________
USAR Training Center located in Lincoln, Nebraska that will provide needed
Readiness Center space for Nebraska ARNG and save costs by re-utilizing
existing federal facilities that have fallen into disrepair. (Current Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
173
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Lincoln 1776 Readiness Center
Lincoln, Nebraska
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
ALT
Readiess Center Add/Alt
310110
REQUIREMENT:
Nebraska ARNG currently has a requirement deficit of 145,000 SF
____________
in Readiness Center space (Cat Code 17180). In addition, renovation of this
facility will allow for the permanent stationing of the 67th Battlefield
Surveillance Brigade (BfSB), a new Grow-The-Army unit, to a facility with
enough space to function and complete assigned missions. Units stationed at
the Lincoln metropolitan area, the second most populated area of the State,
are particularly affected by the shortage of space. The Pershing facility will
move the BfSB out of the 1776 Armory at the Lincoln Complex, opening space for
units currently stationed at the Lincoln Airbase and maximizing training
potential for mission accomplishment. The new facility will be remodeled on
federally leased ground of approximately 3.2 acres.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The BfSB is one of several units presently stationed at
__________________
the 1776 Armory in Lincoln. This is one of two Readiness Centers in Lincoln
that is overcrowded due to the shortage of Readiness Center SF in Nebraska.
Consequently, the 1776 Armory does not meet current space requirements or
authorized allowance criteria and is half the size authorized to support the
missions of the units stationed there. Space deficits include administrative,
classroom, latrine, locker room, and cold storage. Due to it’s location,
addition or renovation is cost prohibitive and expansion is not practical. In
order to satisfy its State mission and promote continued success with
Recruiting and Retention in the area, Nebraska ARNG is seeking opportunities
to alleviate the overcrowded facilities and maintain the local stationing
population.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The Unit’s ability to meet readiness, Recruiting and
_______________________
Retention, and training objectives will continue to be adversely affected if
personnel are not provided with adequate facilities. Delays in the funding of
this project will force the continued use of inadequate, overcrowded
facilities and the present deficiencies will continue to negatively impact
troop morale. The lack of adequate space will continue to impair the
attainment of required mobilization readiness levels for both the National
Guard.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. An economic analysis has been
prepared and utilized in evaluating this project. This project is the most
cost-effective method to satisfy the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. Mission requirements, operational
considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other components.
Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will
be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable
laws and Executive Orders.
PAGE NO. 174
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Lincoln 1776 Readiness Center
Lincoln, Nebraska
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
ALT
Readiess Center Add/Alt
310110
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
FEB 2009
_________
35
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
MAR 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
190
_________
190
_________
127
_________
63
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
NOV 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
SEP 2011
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: LTC TIMOTHY ZEGERS
Phone Number: 402-309-7450
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 175
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 176
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Mead Trng Spt/Field Maint Shop 06/Ut
INSNO= 31487
COST INDEX
Mead, Nebraska
.97
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
NORMAL ADMINISTRATIVE DUTIES MONDAY THRU FRIDAY, WITH TWO DAY TRAINING ASSEMBLIES ONCE OR TWICE PER MONTH
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Wahoo, NE
8.00 miles Readiness Center
1,468
(15,801 )
1961
ARNG
Fremont, NE
15.00 miles Readiness Center
1,468
(15,801 )
1955
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 Readiness Center
4,388 m2
(47,230 SF)
11,400 NOV 2009 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
01 OCT 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
None
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
171
171
171
171
Readiness
Readiness
Readiness
Readiness
Center
Center Add/Alt
Center
Center
5,366
5,366
5,366
5,366
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(57,756
(57,756
(57,756
(57,756
SF)
SF)
SF)
SF)
12,000
2,300
22,000
9,100
500
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 01 OCT 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
3
3
1
1
2
2
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
151
151
13
13
138
138
PAGE NO. 177
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Mead Trng Spt/Field Maint Shop 06/Ut
Mead, Nebraska
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
402nd Military Police BN ( I&R)
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 31487
UIC
______
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
19645ANG04
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
151 _______
151
_______
151
151
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
AUTHORIZED
__________
20
2
16
__________
ACTUAL
______
20
2
16
__________
TOTALS
38
38
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
178
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Mead Trng Spt/Field Maint Shop 06/Utes
Mead, Nebraska
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
Readiness Center
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
310107
11,400
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center
Flammable Materials Facility
Controlled Waste
Unheat Metal Stor
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp(
317) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
3,975
9.29
27.87
375.61
(
(
(
(
----------
UNIT COST
42,787)
100)
300)
4,043)
COST ($000)
1,893
1,767
2,026
1,313
----------
8,354
(7,526)
(16)
(56)
(493)
(132)
(131)
2,138
(427)
(285)
(562)
(200)
(317)
(47)
(300)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
10,492
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
525
_________
SUBTOTAL
11,017
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
331
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
11,348
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
11,400
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $0.600 is based on
actual construction cost de-escalation. Construction will consist of a
specially designed building of permanent masonry concrete block with brick
veneer, concrete footings and flooring, a standing seam or single membrane
roof. Supporting facilities include flexible access roads and parking, rigid
sidewalks and compound area, security fencing and lighting. Physical security
measures will be incorporated into the design including maximum feasible
standoff distance from roads, parking areas and vehicle unloading areas,
berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent access when standoff
distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy conserving features will
be incorporated into design, including energy management control systems and
high efficiency motors, lighting, and HVAC systems. Air Conditioning- 53 Ton
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
4,388 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to provide a Readiness Center, of permanent type
________
construction, to serve the peace time missions of the assigned units. The
proposed site for the project is on Federally owned property. This project is
part of "Grow the Force" funding. (New Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
179
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Mead Trng Spt/Field Maint Shop 06/Ut
Mead, Nebraska
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
310107
REQUIREMENT:
Completion of this project is required to provide required
____________
space for 1 unit with a required strength of 150 soldiers. This new Readiness
Center will provide the necessary administrative, training, kitchen, locker
room and storage areas required to achieve proficiency in their respective
areas of training. The proposed site for the project is on 1194 acres of
Federally owned property.
CURRENT SITUATION:
Due to "Grow the Force", 1 new unit is scheduled to be
__________________
assigned to the Mead Training Site, Mead, NE. The existing Wahoo Readiness
Center is located 7 miles from the Mead Training Site and was constructed in
1961 for $100,290 and consists of 15,801 SF on 2.1 acres. The Wahoo Readiness
Center currently has 162 stationed personnel assigned from the 623rd EN Bn and
is inadequate to fully support this additional unit due to the lack of
adequate latrine, administration, and classroom area. The current facility was
constructed at a time when energy conservation was not a major concern and the
present readiness center does not fully incorporate the newest technology. All
major supporting systems are in extremely poor condition (boiler, floor tile
and roof). The Wahoo Readiness Center was rated "Red" in the latest
Installation Status Report. The existing layout does not provide adequate
space to house both of these units. The new Mead Readiness Center will
adequately support this unit and provide a facility that will enhance and
promote training and recruiting as well as enhance the Mead Training Site
located at Mead, Nebraska.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The unit’s ability to meet its readiness, recruiting
_______________________
and retention, and training objectives will be adversely affected if the
personnel are not provided with the adequate facilities. Delays in the funding
of this project will force the use of an inadequate and unsound facility. The
available facility’s deficiencies will negatively impact troop readiness and
morale. The lack of proper and adequate training, storage and administrative
areas will impair the attainment of required mobilization readiness levels.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
PAGE NO. 180
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Mead Trng Spt/Field Maint Shop 06/Ut
Mead, Nebraska
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
310107
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
NOV 2009
_________
35
_________
65
_________
95
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
666
_________
332
_________
998
_________
998
_________
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
MAR 2011
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
APR 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: LTC TIMOTHY ZEGERS
Phone Number: 402-309-7450
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 181
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 182
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
New Hampshire ARNG
INSNO= NHARNG
COST INDEX
New Hampshire
1.06
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly three times per month and
annual training six weeks per year.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Rochester, NH
7.00 miles Armory
1,057 m2 (11,381 SF)
USAR
Rochester, NH
8.00 miles Reserve Center
1,069 m2 (11,512 SF)
ARNG
Somersworth, NH
13.00 miles Armory
1,152 m2 (12,400 SF)
ARNG
Dover, NH
14.00 miles Armory
1,378 m2 (14,830 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
171
Classroom Facility (Regional
SCOPE
_____
5,164 m2
(55,590 SF)
($000)
______
21,000
START
CMPL
_____
____
JUL 2008 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
12 JUL 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
721
214
RTI Barracks
FMS
5,366
5,366
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(57,756 SF)
(57,756 SF)
16,000
20,400
350
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 06 SEP 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
6
6
2
2
4
4
3
3
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
50
40
9
7
41
34
PAGE NO. 183
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
New Hampshire ARNG
New Hampshire
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= NHARNG
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
NH ARNG TRAINING SITE COMMAND*
HQ (-) 195TH REG (NHRTI)*
1 BN 195TH REG (NHRTI)*
UIC
______
W77825
W8F0AA
W8F0A1
TSPN
____
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
MTOE/TDA
________
NGW778AA
NGW8F0AA
NGW8F0AA
18
13
22
18
10 _______
10
_______
50
41
Assigned/Authorized: 82%
* UNITS THAT MUST TRAIN ON SAME WEEKEND.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
ACTUAL
______
2
__________
TOTALS
2
2
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
184
AUTHORIZED
__________
2
__________
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
New Hampshire ARNG
New Hampshire
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Classroom Facility (Regional Training
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
330034
21,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
General Instruction Building
Energy Management Control Syste
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp( 1,031) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Training Lockers/Storage
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
5,164 (
----
--------
UNIT COST
55,590)
2,861
----
COST ($000)
15,809
(14,774)
(296)
(296)
(443)
--------
3,847
(608)
(420)
(965)
(443)
(1,031)
(300)
(80)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
19,656
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
983
_________
SUBTOTAL
20,639
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
619
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
21,258
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
21,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. Specifically designed Classroom Facility
General Instruction Building of permanent brick masonry and construction with
built-up roof, concrete floors, mechanical and electrical equipment,
partitions of masonry block. Supporting facilities of rigid and flexible
paving, parking area, service drive, fencing and gates, water wells and sewer
system expansion, training lockers and material storage areas. Cost effective
energy conserving features will be incorporated into the design, including
energy management control system and high efficiency motors, lighting and HVAC
systems. Effective force protection measures installed as required. Student
population 350. Air conditioning: 52 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
5,164 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
3,660 m2
________
PROJECT: A new multi-story educational facility to provide training space in
________
support of the NHARNG in the execution of their training plans. Facility to be
built of permanent type construction. The space will permit all NHARNG
personnel to be trained as needed in an educational environmental that will
improve their unit readiness posture. (Current Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
185
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
New Hampshire ARNG
New Hampshire
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Classroom Facility (Regional Training Facility)
330034
REQUIREMENT:
A facility requirement for 55,590 SF that is capable of
____________
supporting individual and team training, as well as individual classroom
instruction. The facility will provide an educational and training support
space to NHARNG assigned units.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing General Instruction Facility has 1401 SM
__________________
15,082 SF of educational space. This space is not adequate to support the
present and future educational training requirements of the NHARNG. This
facility doesn’t meet The Total Army School System (TASS) Standards and will
be used as an administration space upon completion of the Instruction.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
NHARNG unit readiness will degraded because of
_______________________
substandard educational facilities. The lack of space and substandard
conditions will limit the number of soldiers being trained reducing the number
qualified NHNG soldiers. Without a new facility NH will lose school
accreditation and the school will be moved out state, adding a great expense
to train NHNG soldiers and reduce unit readiness.
ADDITIONAL: This project complies with the scope and design criteria of
___________
National Guard Pamphlet (Draft) 415-12 dated 14 Aug 1998 and Design Guide
415-4 dated 30 March 1996. The most similar DoD standards for readiness center
construction do not address all of the current criteria incorporated in the
Army National Guard Readiness Center design and thus do not yield accurate
cost estimates. Therefore, state historical costs for construction of like
facilities were used to develop baseline unit cost and were adjusted for size,
fiscal year and location. This project has been coordinated with the
installation physical security plan, and all physical security measures are
included. All required antiterrorism protection measures are included.
Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been explored during
project development. This project is the only feasible option to meet the
requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and
Housing) certifies that this project has been considered for joint use
potential. The facility will be available for use by other components.
Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will
be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable
laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
PAGE NO. 186
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
JUL 2008
_________
65
_________
65
_________
100
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
New Hampshire ARNG
New Hampshire
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Classroom Facility (Regional Training Facility)
330034
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
1,767
_________
1,767
_________
1,178
_________
589
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
NOV 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
SEP 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: COL Jeffrey Vorce
Phone Number: 603 225-1239
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 187
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
New Hampshire ARNG
INSNO= NHARNG
COST INDEX
New Hampshire
1.06
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with two-day weekend training assembly three times per month and
annual training six weeks per year.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Rochester, NH
7.00 miles Armory
1,057 m2 (11,381 SF)
USAR
Rochester, NH
8.00 miles Reserve Center
1,069 m2 (11,512 SF)
ARNG
Somersworth, NH
13.00 miles Armory
1,152 m2 (12,400 SF)
ARNG
Dover, NH
14.00 miles Armory
1,378 m2 (14,830 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
721
Regional Training Institute B
SCOPE
_____
4,509 m2
(48,537 SF)
($000)
______
15,000
START
CMPL
_____
____
JUL 2008 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
12 JUL 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
171
214
RTI Classroom
FMS
5,366
5,366
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(57,756 SF)
(57,756 SF)
2,200
20,400
350
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 06 SEP 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
PAGE NO. 188
8
4
1
1
7
3
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
113
116
9
9
DD
FORM
MAY 78
104
107
1390s1
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
New Hampshire ARNG
New Hampshire
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
Headquarters, 195th Regiment - RTI
Student Load/Capacity
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= NHARNG
UIC
______
W8F0AA
TSPN
____
66751
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
MTOE/TDA
________
32
35
81 _______
81
_______
113
116
Assigned/Authorized: 102%
* UNITS THAT MUST TRAIN ON SAME WEEKEND.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
ACTUAL
______
0
__________
TOTALS
0
0
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
AUTHORIZED
__________
0
__________
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
PAGE NO.
189
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
New Hampshire ARNG
New Hampshire
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Regional Training Institute Barracks
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
721
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
330035
15,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Regional Training Institute
Energy Management Control Syste
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp(
356) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Commissioning
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
4,509 (
----
--------
UNIT COST
48,537)
2,766
----
--------
COST ($000)
12,934
(12,474)
(249)
(11)
(200)
1,038
(108)
(100)
(35)
(200)
(356)
(140)
(99)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
13,972
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
699
_________
SUBTOTAL
14,671
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
440
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
15,111
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
15,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,000 is based on
actual construction cost de-escalation. Specifically designed Trainee Barracks
Facility of multi-story permanent brick masonry and construction with built-up
roof, concrete floors, mechanical and electrical equipment, partitions of
masonry block. Supporting facilities of rigid and flexible paving, service
drive, parking, fencing and gates, water wells and sewer system expansion and
material storage areas. Cost effective energy conserving features will be
incorporated into the design, including energy management control system and
high efficiency motors, lighting and HVAC systems. Effective force protection
measures installed as required. Student population 350. Air conditioning: 102
tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
48,537 PN ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
131,740 PN
________
PROJECT: A new multi-story barracks facility to provide adequate billeting
________
space in support of the NHARNG in the execution of their training plans.
Facility to be built of permanent type construction. The space will permit all
NHARNG personnel to be properly billeted while attending educational programs
at the New Hampshire National Guard Training Site (NHNGTS). (Current Mission)
PAGE NO.
190
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
New Hampshire ARNG
New Hampshire
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Regional Training Institute Barracks Facility
330035
REQUIREMENT:
A facility requirement for 48,537SF that is capable of
____________
billeting individuals and teams in private and semi-private rooms and
latrines. This facility must meet the Total Army School System (TASS)
Standards. This facility will provide housing to NHNG soldiers attending
educational training programs at the NHNGTS.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing barracks have 13.62 SM (14,662 SF) of
__________________
billeting space. The NHNGTS barracks do not meet TASS standards, seismic and
current building codes. A major upgrade is cost prohibitive because of the
barracks seismic conditions. The space is not adequate to support the present
and future billeting requirements of the NHARNG.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
NHARNG unit readiness will degraded because of
_______________________
substandard billeting facilities. The lack of adequate billeting space and
substandard conditions will limit the number of soldiers attending educational
training at the NHNGTS. Without a new facility NH will lose school
accreditation and the school will be moved out state, adding a great expense
to train NHNG soldiers and reduce unit readiness.
ADDITIONAL: The most similar DoD standards for Readiness Center construction
___________
do not address all of the current criteria incorporated in the Army National
Guard Readiness Center design and thus do not yield accurate cost estimates.
Therefore, state historical costs for construction of like facilities were
used to develop baseline unit cost and were adjusted for size, fiscal year and
location. This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. An economic analysis has been
prepared and utilized in evaluating this project. This project is the best
method to satisfy the requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Installations and Housing) certifies that this project has been considered
for joint use potential. The facility will be available for use by other
components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective
practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and construction
of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and
other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
JUL 2008
_________
65
_________
65
_________
100
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Basis:
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 191
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
New Hampshire ARNG
New Hampshire
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Regional Training Institute Barracks Facility
330035
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
772
_________
549
_________
1,321
_________
881
_________
440
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
JAN 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: COL Jeffrey Vorce
Phone Number:
PAGE NO. 192
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Farmington Readiness Center
INSNO= 35A75
COST INDEX
Farmington, New Mexico
.97
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Gallup, NM
95.00 miles Miles
1,378
(14,830 SF)
ARNG
Grants, NM
115.00 miles Miles
1,378
(14,830 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 Readiness Center Add/Alt
5,363 m2
(57,722 SF)
8,500 OCT 2009 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
16 APR 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 20 JUN 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
6
6
0
0
6
6
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
220
208
7
7
213
201
PAGE NO. 193
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Farmington Readiness Center
Farmington, New Mexico
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
MP CO COMBAT SUPPORT
CO T MDM TRK CO
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 35A75
UIC
______
G19120
WPGXA1
TSPN
____
31921
35546
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
170
170
50 _______
38
_______
220
208
Assigned/Authorized: 94%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
AUTHORIZED
__________
54
80
41
__________
ACTUAL
______
54
80
41
__________
TOTALS
175
175
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
194
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Farmington Readiness Center
Farmington, New Mexico
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Readiness Center
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
350075
8,500
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center Add
Readiness Center Alt
Building Information Systems
Energy Management Control Syste
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp(
910) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2 (SF)
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
3,499 (
1,864 (
------------
UNIT COST
37,659)
20,063)
COST ($000)
2,016
433.25
------------
8,576
(7,053)
(808)
(270)
(158)
(143)
(144)
2,044
(140)
(55)
(469)
(42)
(910)
(148)
(280)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
10,620
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
531
_________
SUBTOTAL
11,151
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
335
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
11,486
State Share
2,986
TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST
8,500
TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
8,500
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. An alteration and addition of the existing
readiness center to provide a larger, modernized facility of permanent
masonry-type construction, with standing seam roof,concrete floors, and energy
efficient mechanical and electrical equipment. The modernized facility will be
two-story. The expanded, modernized facility will support Grow The Army
Forces. Supporting facilities will include a wash platform, loading ramp,
sidewalks, and military vehicle and POV parking. Cost effective energy
conserving features will be implemented into the design of the facility,
including efficient HVAC system, to achieve a LEED Silver Rating.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: Alteration of an existing Readiness Center and addition of space to
________
support a Grow the Army (GTA) directive for the State of New Mexico. Current
facility is on state owned land. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The facility is required to provide space for training of unit
____________
personnel and maintenance and readiness of unit equipment. Responsibility for
training and readiness of National Guard soldiers is shifting from active duty
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
195
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Farmington Readiness Center
Farmington, New Mexico
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
350075
REQUIREMENT:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
mobilization sites to the State Adjutants General at state facilities.
Military police units are some of the most effective types of units both in
combat theater of operations and during national/state emergencies. The
facility will be built on approximately 11 acres of state-owned land. The
current facility does not meet the authorized space criteria for the proposed
total strength of 243 soldiers. The current facility lacks approximately
45,000 sf of authorized space to meet that strength.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The current readiness center is too small and inadequate
__________________
to support the GTA force structure that is assigned at the facility. Space for
full-time and M-day force is grossly inadequate. The current facility does not
meet the authorized space criteria for the proposed total strength of 243
soldiers. The current facility lacks approximately 45,000 sf of authorized
space to meet that strength. Parking for privately owned and military vehicles
is inadequate.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
If the project is not approved, the New Mexico
_______________________
National Guard will be unable to support the Army Campaign Plan with regard to
the growth in military police unit force structure. Failure to appropriate
funding for this project will have a severe negative impact on the combat
readiness of the military police company, because it won’t have the necessary
readiness and training space.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. An economic analysis has been
prepared and utilized in evaluating this project. This project is the most
cost-effective method to satisfy the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. Mission requirements, operational
considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other components.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
PAGE NO. 196
NOV 2009
_________
30
_________
_________
_________
JAN 2010
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Farmington Readiness Center
Farmington, New Mexico
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
350075
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(c) Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
983
_________
983
_________
655
_________
328
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
NOV 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: LTC NORBERT ARCHIBEQE
Phone Number: 505-474-1880
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 197
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 198
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
High Point Readiness Center
INSNO= 37C10
COST INDEX
High Point, North Carolina
.89
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Reservist: 0 nights/week. Full-Time Personnel: 5 days/week
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
AR
High Point, NC
5.00 miles Mile
1,378
(14,830 SF)
ARNG
Thomasville, NC
8.00 miles Mile
1,378
(14,830 SF)
AR
Greensboro, NC
19.00 miles Mile
1,378
(14,830 SF)
ARNG
Greensboro, NC
20.00 miles Mile
1,378
(14,830 SF)
ARNG
Asheboro, NC
21.00 miles Mile
1,378
(14,830 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
17180 Readinss Center Add/Alt
SCOPE
_____
415 m2
(4,466 SF)
($000)
______
1,551
START
CMPL
_____
____
OCT 2009 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
08 FEB 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 30 SEP 2008
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
7
7
0
0
7
7
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
192
194
13
12
179
182
PAGE NO. 199
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
High Point Readiness Center
High Point, North Carolina
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
BN FA BN HIMARS, FIRE
BN BRIGADE SUPPORT BN
HHC SUSTAINMENT BDE W
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 37C10
UIC
______
WPJHA0
WPJSG0
WPSEB0
TSPN
____
20665
12030
26367
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
74
30
63
132
55 _______
32
_______
192
194
Assigned/Authorized: 101%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
AUTHORIZED
__________
65
44
10
2
__________
ACTUAL
______
65
44
10
2
__________
TOTALS
121
121
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
200
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
High Point Readiness Center
High Point, North Carolina
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Readiness Center Add/Alt
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
370898
1,551
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center Addition
Readiness Center Alteration
Building Information Systems
Energy Managment Control
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
197) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Information Systems
m2 (SF)
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
191.94 (
222.97 (
----------
UNIT COST
2,066)
2,400)
COST ($000)
2,802
1,758
----------
1,064
(538)
(392)
(45)
(33)
(28)
(28)
737
(55)
(347)
(197)
(90)
(48)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
1,801
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
90
_________
SUBTOTAL
1,891
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
57
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
1,948
State Share
397
TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST
1,551
TOTAL FEDERAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
1,551
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to modernize an existing readiness center, of
________
permanent type construction, to serve the peacetime missions of the assigned
units. The space will permit all personnel to perform the necessary tasks that
will improve the unit’s readiness posture. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
Readiness will be enhanced by modernizing the existing
____________
readiness center with improved troop areas, interior and exterior, capable of
supporting the training, supply, administrative and maintenance missions of
assigned units. This project has been given high priority in keeping within
the states plan to either modernize or replace older, inadequate armories
which will save in operating costs, provide adequate parking and areas for
training to meet readiness objectives.
CURRENT SITUATION:
There are deficiencies in the existing readiness center
__________________
and supporting facilities at this location the correction of which are
necessary to accomplish the assigned unit’s mission. By deferring this
project, training, administration and troop morale will suffer, all of which
impact on readiness.
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
201
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
High Point Readiness Center
High Point, North Carolina
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center Add/Alt
370898
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The unit’s ability to meet its readiness, recruiting
_______________________
and retention, and training objectives will continue to be adversely affected
if the personnel are not provided with the adequate facilities. Delays in the
funding of this project will force the continued use of an inadequate and
unsound facility and the present facility’s deficiencies will continue to
negatively impact troop readiness and morale. The lack of proper and adequate
training, storage and administrative areas will continue to impair the
attainment of required mobilization readiness levels by reducing ability to
complete adequate and timely training related to METL accomplishment by
assigned staff.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. An economic analysis has been
prepared and utilized in evaluating this project. This project is the most
cost-effective method to satisfy the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. Mission requirements, operational
considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other components.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
OCT 2009
_________
65
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2010
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
PAGE NO. 202
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
($000)
_________
132
_________
132
_________
88
_________
44
_________
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
High Point Readiness Center
High Point, North Carolina
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center Add/Alt
370898
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(5) Construction Start................................... _________
NOV 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: COL WILLIAM JOHNSON
Phone Number: 919-664-6114
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 203
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 204
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Camp Grafton
INSNO= 38A45
COST INDEX
Devils Lake, North Dakota
1.03
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Cando, ND
35.00 miles Armory
1,416 m2 (15,240 SF)
ARNG
Rugby, ND
57.00 miles Armory
1,746 m2 (18,793 SF)
ARNG
Carrington, ND
57.00 miles Armory
1,266 m2 (13,626 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 Readiness Center Addition/Alt
6,340 m2
(68,240 SF)
11,200 MAR 2008 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
02
JUN 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
Training Site, Phase III Military Education Facili
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
5,366
(57,756 SF)
16,900
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 01 JAN 2000
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
21
10
4
2
17
8
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
200
184
19
18
181
166
PAGE NO. 205
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Grafton
Devils Lake, North Dakota
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 38A45
UNIT DESIGNATION
UIC
________________
______
3662 MAINTENANCE COMPANY (GS)(-)
WQCCAA
HEADQUARTERS, HEADQUARTERS DETACHMENT 136 QUART WYT2AA
TSPN ________
MTOE/TDA
____
31125 43649LNG15
34503 10466LNG02
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
161
145
39
39
0 _______
0
_______
200
184
Assigned/Authorized: 92%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
AUTHORIZED
__________
45
44
__________
ACTUAL
______
40
35
__________
TOTALS
89
75
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
206
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Camp Grafton
Devils Lake, North Dakota
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
ADD
Readiness Center Add/Alt
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
380014
11,200
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center Addition
Readiness Center Alteration
Flammable Mats Facility Add
Unheated Enclosed Vehicle Stora
Flammable Mats Facility Alt
SDD and EPAct05
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Steam And/Or Chilled Water Dist
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp(
108) Demo(
)
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
3,866
1,080
9.01
1,380
4.92
(
(
(
(
(
--------
UNIT COST
41,616)
11,624)
97)
14,850)
53)
COST ($000)
1,964
654.45
1,932
965.74
697.97
--------
9,834
(7,592)
(707)
(17)
(1,332)
(3)
(183)
609
(57)
(21)
(19)
(388)
(16)
(108)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
10,443
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
522
_________
SUBTOTAL
10,965
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
329
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
11,294
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
11,200
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $0.500 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed readiness center
addition, to include unheated enclosed vehicle storage, of permanent masonry
type construction, prestressed concrete panel exterior walls, concrete block
interior walls with concrete floors, and a built-up or single membrane roof. A
one-story structure with all necessary mechanical and electrical equipment,
required outside supporting facilities and all other installed equipment.
Physical security measures will be incorporated into design including maximum
feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas and vehicle unloading
areas; berms; heavy landscaping; and bollards to prevent access when standoff
distance cannot be maintained. Air conditioning: 15 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
3,561 m2 ADQT:
1,234 m2 SUBSTD:
1,840 m2
________
PROJECT: This project is to provide adequate additional space to serve the
________
peace time missions of the assigned units. The space will permit all assigned
personnel to perform the necessary tasks that will improve the unit s
readiness posture in support of combat objectives. The site of the project is
on state land.
(Current Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
207
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Grafton
Devils Lake, North Dakota
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
ADD
Readiness Center Add/Alt
380014
REQUIREMENT:
A 2,126 SM (23,628 SF) armory addition is required to
____________
adequately provide the 200 ARNG personnel housed in this facility with the
necessary administrative, supply, classroom, locker, latrine, and kitchen
space required to achieve the proficiency in required training and to
accomplish the assigned readiness objective.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The present armory, constructed in 1982, consists of
__________________
33,081 SF. Additional troop strength, subsequent reorganizations and
increasing equipment authorizations have combined to create a significant
deficit in required space. The existing armory is in good condition and will
continue to serve its intended purpose.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The ability of units to meet their readiness,
_______________________
recruiting and retention, and training objectives will continue to be
adversely affected if the personnel are not provided with the proper
facilities that they critically need. Training costs will continue to escalate
due to having to utilize other training areas and facilities in order to meet
minimum requirements.
ADDITIONAL: The most similar DoD standards do not address all of the current
___________
criteria incorporated in the (project type) design and thus do not yield
accurate cost estimates. Therefore, state historical costs for construction of
like facilities were used to develop baseline unit costs and were adjusted for
size, fiscal year and location. This project has been coordinated with the
installation physical security plan, and all physical security measures are
included. All required antiterrorism protection measures are included.
Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been explored during
project development. This project is the only feasible option to meet the
requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and
Housing) certifies that this project has been considered for joint use
potential. The facility will be available for use by other components.
Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will
be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable
laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
PAGE NO. 208
MAR 2008
_________
100
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Basis:
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Grafton
Devils Lake, North Dakota
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
ADD
Readiness Center Add/Alt
380014
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
982
_________
982
_________
655
_________
327
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
DEC 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
JAN 2011
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
JAN 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: LTC STEVE TABOR
Phone Number: 701-333-2075
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 209
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 210
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
MTA Camp Santiago
INSNO= RQ577
COST INDEX
Salinas, Puerto Rico
1.24
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
,
.00 miles
1,266
(13,626 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17864 Multi Purpose Machine Gun Ran
5 FP
(5 FP)
9,200 DEC 2009 MAY 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
01 JUN 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
(Date)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 06 OCT 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
2
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
175
84
27
3
148
81
PAGE NO. 211
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
MTA Camp Santiago
Salinas, Puerto Rico
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= RQ577
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
CO A (BN ENGINEER BATTALION)
UIC
______
WP1AA0
TSPN
____
30546
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
175 _______
84
_______
175
84
Assigned/Authorized: 48%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
AUTHORIZED
__________
62
36
5
__________
ACTUAL
______
62
36
5
__________
TOTALS
103
103
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
212
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
MTA Camp Santiago
Salinas, Puerto Rico
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
178
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
436021
9,200
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Mulitpurpose Machine Gun Range
Firing Positions/Defilade
Stationary Infantry Targets (SI
Double SIT
Stationary Armed Targets (SAT)
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp( 1,765) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2 (SF)
EA
LS
LS
EA
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
26.94 (
5 ---6 --
-------
UNIT COST
290)
COST ($000)
5,867
2,500
--6,500
-------
1,671
(158)
(13)
(65)
(33)
(39)
(1,363)
6,815
(310)
(420)
(125)
(1,765)
(127)
(4,068)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
8,486
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
424
_________
SUBTOTAL
8,910
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
267
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
9,177
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
9,200
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: A 8-Lane Multipurpose Machine Gun Range (MPMG) and 1 lane of Heavy
________
Sniper to support of training requirements of the units habitually train at
Camp Santiago. Support facilities: operations/storage building, ammo breakdown
building, male/female latrine, mess shelter, bleacher enclosure, and utilities
as required. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design
including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and
vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent
access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Project includes funding
for a new access road to the proposed range site. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
This project is required to provide the Puerto Rico Army
____________
National Guard and other habitual users of Camp Santiago with adequate,
doctrinally correct, throughput capability for: M60, M21, M24, M240-Series,
M2, M107, M110 and MK19 (TP).
CURRENT SITUATION:
There are no other Multi-Purpose Machine Gun Ranges
__________________
within 2 hours travel distance that meet training requirements. Currently no
ranges exist that provide the realism in training required to meet combat
training objectives.
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
213
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
MTA Camp Santiago
Salinas, Puerto Rico
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
436021
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
Moving Infantry Target (MIT)
Power Center/Transformer /Panel
Downrange Power
Power and Comm Trenching
Energy Management Control Syste
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
EA
EA
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
8 -5 -------
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
8,000
(64)
27,500
(138)
-(515)
-(550)
-(32)
-(32)
-(32)
_________
Total
1,363
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Individuals and crews will not be able to train and
_______________________
qualify annually on their assigned weapons. The only alternative (traveling to
other installations) will result in increased costs and loss of valuable
training time. Readiness will be degraded if the alternative chosen.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. An economic analysis has been
prepared and utilized in evaluating this project. This project is the most
cost-effective method to satisfy the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. Mission requirements, operational
considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other components.
Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will
be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable
laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract:
(2)
PAGE NO. 214
DEC 2009
_________
15
_________
_________
_________
APR 2010
_________
MAY 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
MTA Camp Santiago
Salinas, Puerto Rico
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Multi Purpose Machine Gun Range
436021
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
764
_________
764
_________
509
_________
255
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
NOV 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
DEC 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name:
Phone Number:
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 215
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
MTA Camp Santiago
INSNO= RQ577
COST INDEX
Salinas, Puerto Rico
1.24
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
JUAN DIAZ, PR
15.00 miles ARMORY
1,266
(13,626 SF)
ARNG
JUAN DIAZ, PR
17.00 miles BASE
1,266
(13,626 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17879 Live Fire Shoot House
232 m2
(2,500 SF)
3,100 DEC 2009 MAY 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
01 MAY 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 06 OCT 2009
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
PAGE NO. 216
2
2
0
0
2
2
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
175
84
27
3
DD
FORM
MAY 78
148
81
1390s1
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
MTA Camp Santiago
Salinas, Puerto Rico
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
CO A (BN ENGINEER BATTALION)
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= RQ577
UIC
______
WP1AA0
TSPN
____
30546
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
175 _______
84
_______
175
84
Assigned/Authorized: 48%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
AUTHORIZED
__________
62
36
5
__________
ACTUAL
______
62
36
5
__________
TOTALS
103
103
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
PAGE NO.
217
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
MTA Camp Santiago
Salinas, Puerto Rico
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Live Fire Shoot House
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
178
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
436023
3,100
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Live Fire Shoothouse
m2 (SF)
Energy Management Control Syste LS
SDD and EPAct05
LS
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
165) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
232.26 (
----
------
UNIT COST
2,500)
6,674
----
------
COST ($000)
1,643
(1,550)
(31)
(31)
(31)
1,209
(155)
(35)
(165)
(30)
(824)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
2,852
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
143
_________
SUBTOTAL
2,995
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
90
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
3,085
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
3,100
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: Construct a Live Fire Exercise Shoothouse with required supporting
________
facilities. This range will be used to train and test individuals, teams,
sections, or squads on the skills necessary to conduct individual and
collective tasks of building clearing/occupying. This range will utilize a
bullet encapsulation system to reduce the Surface Danger Zone. (Current
Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The LFSH will train and test individuals, teams, sections and
____________
squads on the skills necessary to conduct indiviual and collective tasks of
building clearing/occupying. All targets are fully automated, and the
event-specific target scenario will be computer driven and scored from the
range operations center.
CURRENT SITUATION:
There are no Live Fire Shoot Houses within reasonable
__________________
travel distance limit specified in NGB/FORSCOM Reg 350-2 that meet IBCT
training requirements
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
If this project is not provided, it will be
_______________________
impossible for assigned units to acquire and maintain the proficiency required
for combat units in an increasingly urban environment. This proficiency can
only result from realistic training under simulated combat training. Traveling
PAGE NO.
218
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
MTA Camp Santiago
Salinas, Puerto Rico
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Live Fire Shoot House
436023
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
(CONTINUED)
______________________________________
to an alternate facility will result in increased cost and loss of valuable
collective training time normally reserved for annual training. Overall
readiness will be degraded regardless of the alternative used.
ADDITIONAL: Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been
___________
explored during project development. This project is the only feasible option
to meet this requirement. Sustainable principles will be integrated into the
design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with
Executive order 13123 and other applicable laws.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract:
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
DEC 2009
_________
15
_________
_________
_________
FEB 2010
_________
MAY 2010
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
NOV 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
DEC 2012
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
_________
250
_________
250
_________
167
_________
83
_________
PAGE NO. 219
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
MTA Camp Santiago
Salinas, Puerto Rico
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Live Fire Shoot House
436023
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (CONTINUED)
_______________________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name:
Phone Number:
PAGE NO. 220
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Camp Fogarty Training Site
INSNO= 44111
COST INDEX
East Greenwich, Rhode Island
1.04
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ANG
Quonset AB (N.Kings
.25 miles Air Base
10 ha (25 AC)
1945
ARNG
Camp Fogarty (E.Gre
6.00 miles Training Site
152 ha (376 AC)
1945
ARNG
Cm Readiness Ctr-Cr
12.00 miles Armory
3,279 m2 (35,300 SF)
1985
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
44220 USPFO
5,877 m2
(63,260 SF)
27,000 OCT 2008 OCT 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
27
JAN 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
21407
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
5,339 m2
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(57,469 SF)
13,041
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 27 JAN 2002
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
83
83
0
0
0
0
83
83
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
3,030
2,560
419
372
2,611
2,188
PAGE NO. 221
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Fogarty Training Site
East Greenwich, Rhode Island
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 44111
UNIT DESIGNATION
UIC
________________
______
THE USPFO SUPPORTS ALL UNITS OF THE RHODE ISLAN
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
3,030 _______
2,560
_______
3,030
2,560
Assigned/Authorized: 84%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
AUTHORIZED
__________
10
2
__________
ACTUAL
______
10
2
__________
TOTALS
12
12
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
222
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Camp Fogarty Training Site
East Greenwich, Rhode Island
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
USPFO
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
442
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
440009
27,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
USPFO
m2 (SF)
USPFO Warehouse
m2 (SF)
Energy Management Control Syste LS
SDD and EPAct05
LS
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp( 1,667) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
3,700 (
2,177 (
----
-------
UNIT COST
39,824)
23,436)
2,816
2,632
----
COST ($000)
17,122
(10,420)
(5,730)
(324)
(324)
(324)
-------
8,224
(411)
(331)
(627)
(1,667)
(269)
(4,919)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
25,346
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,267
_________
SUBTOTAL
26,613
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
798
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
27,411
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
27,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed USPFO of permanent
masonry type construction, brick and concrete block units with concrete
floors, and a built-up or single membrane roof. A one-story structure with
mechanical and electrical equipment and prewired work stations. Outside
supporting facilities include military and privately-owned vehicle parking,
fencing, sidewalks, exterior fire protection, outside lighting, access roads,
detached facility sign, wash platform, fuel storage & dispensing system, and
flagpole. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design
including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and
vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent
access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy
conserving features will be incorporated into design, including energy
management control systems and high efficiency motors, lighting, and HVAC
systems. Air conditioning: 15 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
5,877 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to provide a new USPFO of permanent type
________
construction to provide the logistical support for the Rhode Island Army
National Guard. The space will permit all personnel to perform the necessary
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
223
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Fogarty Training Site
East Greenwich, Rhode Island
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
USPFO
440009
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
tasks logistical management support for RIARNG units.
(Current
Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
A 4,713 SM (50,735 SF) building is necessary to provide for the
____________
logistical management support of all Rhode Island Army National Guard
units.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The current USPFO was constructed in 1936 and is totally
__________________
inadequate to support the current mission of the Rhode Island Army National
Guard.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The USPFO’s ability to meet its logistical
_______________________
management support objectives will continue to be adversely affected if the
personnel are not provided with the proper facilities that they critically
need. The overall readiness of the National Guard could also be adversely
affected as the units could become a non-mobilization asset if this project is
not provided.
ADDITIONAL:
This project has been
___________
coordinated with the installation physical security plan, and all physical
security measures are included. All required antiterrorism protection measures
are included. Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been
explored during project development. This project is the only feasible option
to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Installations and Housing) certifies that this project has been considered
for joint use potential. The facility will be available for use by other
components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective
practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and construction
of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and
other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
PAGE NO. 224
OCT 2008
_________
65
_________
65
_________
100
_________
JUN 2009
_________
OCT 2010
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Fogarty Training Site
East Greenwich, Rhode Island
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
USPFO
440009
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(3) Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
1,873
_________
1,873
_________
1,249
_________
624
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
NOV 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: LTC Sean McKiernan
Phone Number: 401 275-4664
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 225
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 226
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Watertown Range Training Site
INSNO= 46C52
COST INDEX
Watertown, South Dakota
.95
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Watertown, SD
1.00 miles Armory
1,513 m2 (16,281 SF)
1958
ARNG
Brookings, SD
52.00 miles Armory
2,185 m2 (23,522 SF)
1972
ARNG
Brookings, SD
52.00 miles OMS
472 m2 (5,085 SF)
1978
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 Readiness Center
8,816 m2
(94,890 SF)
25,000 JAN 2008 SEP 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
10
FEB 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
470
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 06 FEB 2007
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
25
25
2
2
22
22
1
1
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
1,271
235
28
28
243
207
PAGE NO. 227
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Watertown Range Training Site
Watertown, South Dakota
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
HHB, MLRS BN (FIRES BDE)
DET 1, BATTERY A, 1/147TH FIELD ARTILLERY BATTA
DISTR CO, BSB COMBAT SPT BDE (BSB CSB) (ME)
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 46C52
UIC
______
ARNG
ARNG
ARNG
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
TSPN ________
MTOE/TDA
____
20604 06466G000
20604 06467G000
20604 06468G000
94
79
59
38
118 _______
118
_______
271
235
Assigned/Authorized: 86%
*UNITS THAT MUST TRAIN ON SAME WEEKEND
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
17
6
1
3
35
__________
ACTUAL
______
17
6
1
3
35
__________
TOTALS
62
62
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
228
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Watertown Range Training Site
Watertown, South Dakota
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Readiness Center
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
460085
25,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center
Unheated Encl/Shed-TP Vhcl Strg
Controlled Waste Facility
Flammable Materials Facility
Building Information Systems
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp( 1,505) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
7,380
1,394
27.87
13.94
(
(
(
(
--
-------
UNIT COST
79,440)
15,000)
300)
150)
1,928
971.87
2,304
2,324
--
-------
COST ($000)
16,685
(14,228)
(1,354)
(64)
(32)
(364)
(643)
6,648
(287)
(661)
(1,449)
(1,505)
(277)
(2,469)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
23,333
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,167
_________
SUBTOTAL
24,500
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
735
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
25,235
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
25,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment based on actual
construction cost de-escalation.
A readiness center of permanent masonry
type construction, brick and concrete block units with concrete floors, and a
metal or single membrane roof. A multi-story structure with mechanical and
electrical equipment. A Distributive Training Technology classroom is to be
included in the construction of the primary facility. Outside supporting
facilities include military and privately-owned vehicle parking, fencing,
sidewalks, exterior fire protection, outside lighting, access roads, detached
facility sign, wash platform, multi-level loading dock, fuel containment pad &
building for MTOE fullers, fuel storage/dispensing system, and flagpole.
Physical security measures will be incorporated into design including maximum
feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading
areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent access when standoff
distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy conserving features will
be incorporated into design, including energy management control systems and
high efficiency motors, lighting, and HVAC systems. Air conditioning: 156
tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
7,046 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to provide a readiness center, of permanent type
________
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
229
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Watertown Range Training Site
Watertown, South Dakota
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
460085
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
Building Information Systems
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
----
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
---Total
(321)
(321)
(1)
_________
643
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
construction, to serve the peacetime missions of the assigned units. The space
will permit all personnel to perform the necessary tasks that will contribute
to the unit s readiness posture. The site of the project is on federal land.
(New Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
This facility is required to house elements of the 2nd
____________
Battalion, 147th Field Artillery: Headquarters, Headquarters and Service
Battery (-) and Detachment 1, Battery A; as well as Detachment 2, 727th
Transportation Company. These units have a required strength of 185 personnel.
The armory will provide the necessary administrative, training and storage
areas required to achieve proficiency in required training tasks. An 11 acre
federally licensed site is available for this project.
CURRENT SITUATION:
Headquarters, Headquarters and Service Battery (-) and
__________________
Detachment 1, Battery A of the 2nd Battalion, 147th Field Artillery; as well
as Detachment 2, 727th Transportation Company are located in an undersized
facility. This is a 44-year-old facility built to accommodate 80 people and
has no potential for expansion. The facility is inadequate to fully support
artillery and transportation units due to the lack of adequate military and
Privately Owned Vehicle parking, administrative, unit storage and classroom
space. Locker rooms have been converted to classrooms and the individual
equipment lockers are being stored on the drill floor. The readiness center is
not easily accessible from any of the major streets or highways and is located
within a residential area. With the construction of a new readiness center,
the West Kemp Avenue Armory will be closed and Headquarters, Headquarters and
Service Battery (-); Detachment 1, Battery A of the 2nd Battalion, 147th Field
Artillery; as well as Detachment 2, 727th Transportation Company will be
located at the Highway 20 facility.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The units’ ability to meet their readiness,
_______________________
recruiting, retention, and training objectives will continue to be adversely
affected if they are not provided with the adequate facilities. Delays in the
funding of this project will force the continued use of an inadequate and
undersized facility and the present facility’s deficiencies will continue to
negatively impact troop readiness and morale. The lack of proper and adequate
training, storage and administrative areas will continue to impair the
attainment of required mobilization readiness levels.
PAGE NO. 230
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Watertown Range Training Site
Watertown, South Dakota
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
460085
ADDITIONAL: ADDITIONAL: Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have
___________
been explored during project development. This project is the only feasible
option to meet this requirement. Sustainable principles will be integrated
into the design, development, and construction of the project in accordance
with Executive Order 13423 and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
JOINT USE CERTIFICATION: The Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Army
(Installations and Housing) certifies that this project has been considered
for joint use potential. This facility will be available for use by other
components. ANTITERRIORISM/FORCE PROTECTION: This project has been coordinated
with the installation physical security plan. All required physical security
measures and all anti-terrorism/force protection measures are included.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
JUN 2008
_________
95
_________
_________
_________
JAN 2009
_________
SEP 2010
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
NOV 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
MAR 2012
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
_________
1,363
_________
1,363
_________
909
_________
454
_________
PAGE NO. 231
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Watertown Range Training Site
Watertown, South Dakota
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
460085
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (CONTINUED)
_______________________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: LTC KIT CLINE
Phone Number: 605 737-6601
PAGE NO. 232
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Camp Swift
INSNO= 48555
COST INDEX
Bastrop, Texas
.87
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
NORMAL ADMINISTRATION FIVE DAYS PER WEEK, A TWO-DAY TRAINING ASSEMBLY TWO OR THREE TIMES PER MONTH, PLUS 6
TO 8 FIFTEEN DAY TRAINING PERIODS DURING THE YEAR.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
CAMP MABRY (AUSTIN)
40.00 miles ARMORY
13,099 m2 (141,000 SF)
1997
ARNG
CAMP MABRY (AUDTIN)
40.00 miles ARMORY
9,544 m2 (102,736 SF)
1977
ARNG
BEE CAVES (AUSTIN),
40.00 miles ARMORY
1,885 m2 (20,289 SF)
1960
ARNG
AUSTIN (51ST), TX
40.00 miles ARMOTY
5,239 m2 (56,387 SF)
1988
ARNG
RESERVE CENTER, TX
40.00 miles RESERVE
8,909 m2 (95,900 SF)
1975
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
SCOPE
_____
($000)
______
START
_____
CMPL
____
17898 URBAN ASSAULT COURSE
5 SN
(5 SN)
2,600 OCT 2009 JUL 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
08 FEB 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
NONE
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 18 JAN 2007
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
17,580
14,344
1,764
1,080
15,816
13,264
PAGE NO. 233
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Swift
Bastrop, Texas
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 48555
UNIT DESIGNATION
UIC
________________
______
36TH INFANTRY DIVISION, TEXAS ARMY NATIONAL GUE ARNG
TSPN
____
4036
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
17,580 _______
14,344
_______
17,580 14,344
Assigned/Authorized: 81%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
ACTUAL
______
0
__________
TOTALS
0
0
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
234
AUTHORIZED
__________
0
__________
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Camp Swift
Bastrop, Texas
Urban Assault Course
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
178
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
480290
2,600
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Mout Assault Course (MAC)
Drainage Ditch
Site Emplacement (exterior Stan
Site Emplacement (Exterior Hut)
Station 1- Individual/Team
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
196) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
LN
LN
EA
EA
EA
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
1
1
6
28
1
UNIT COST
------
150,120
4,300
4,800
800.00
14,856
-------
-------
COST ($000)
1,179
(150)
(4)
(29)
(22)
(15)
(959)
1,212
(20)
(56)
(200)
(196)
(130)
(610)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
2,391
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
120
_________
SUBTOTAL
2,511
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
75
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
2,586
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
2,600
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
A 5-station Urban Assault Course (UAC) with a
Clearing Techniques Building, Task Techniques Station, Grenadier Gunnery
Station, Offense/Defense Station and Underground Trainer.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: An Urban Assault Course for support of Texas National Guard Infantry
________
Troops. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
This range will support the individual and collective
____________
familiarization and qualification requirements of all personnel assigned to
units in the Division during inactive duty and annual training periods and
will maximize annual training time for collective training. In addition, it is
expected that this facility will be used by other units. This range will be
constructed on Federal land under long-term lease from the State.
CURRENT SITUATION:
There are no other ranges within 2 hours travel distance
__________________
(limit specified in NGB/FORSCOM Reg 350-2) that meet qualification standards.
The Urban Assault Course is required to meet the training requirements of the
Division Troops. The nearest range facility that meets current requirements is
located on FT Hood, TX, which is nearly impossible to schedule due to use by
active duty troops.
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
235
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Swift
Bastrop, Texas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Urban Assault Course
480290
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
Station 2 Squad/Platoon
Station 3 Grenadier
Station 4 Urban Offense/Defense
Station 5 Underground Trainer
Observation Podium 1 per LFX La
Street (USACE EXAMPLE)
Embankments For Building
Short Wall For Brenadier Statio
Rubbed CMU Wall Grenadier Stati
Uninterruptable Power Supply
Underground Electric Lines
Flagpole
Site emplacement (grenidier fac
Hasty positions (grenadier stat
Antiterrorism Measures
EA
EA
EA
EA
EA
m3 (CY)
EA
EA
EA
EA
LN
EA
EA
EA
LS
QUANTITY
1
1
1
1
3
727.09
190
2
1
1
1
1
5
1
-----(
----------
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
57,745
(58)
11,087
(11)
404,924
(405)
107,719
(108)
212.00
(1)
951)
69.32
(50)
17.00
(3)
100.00
(1)
700.00
(1)
255,160
(255)
5,560
(6)
7,000
(7)
620.00
(3)
95.00
(1)
-(49)
_________
Total
959
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Personnel will be required to train on inadequate
_______________________
ranges or to travel excessive distances to adequate ranges. The only
alternative (traveling to Fort Hood) will result in increased costs and loss
of valuable collective training time normally reserved for annual training.
Overall readiness will be degraded regardless of the alternative used.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. Mission requirements, operational
considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other components.
Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will
be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable
laws and Executive Orders.
PAGE NO. 236
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Swift
Bastrop, Texas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Urban Assault Course
480290
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
OCT 2009
_________
35
_________
65
_________
100
_________
JAN 2010
_________
JUL 2010
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
183
_________
183
_________
122
_________
61
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
NOV 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
DEC 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: LTC TIMOTHY SENECAUT
Phone Number:
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 237
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 238
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Camp Maxey
INSNO= 48G00
COST INDEX
Powderly, Texas
.87
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
A two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
,
.00 miles
8,909
(95,900 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17822 Qualification Training Range
15 LN
(15 LN)
2,500 NOV 2007 OCT 2008
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
08 FEB 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
178
Urban Assualt Course
5,339
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(57,469 SF)
2,600
19,696
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 19 OCT 2005
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
10
8
0
0
4
2
6
6
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
2,089
1,280
153
84
1,936
1,196
PAGE NO. 239
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Maxey
Powderly, Texas
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 48G00
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
HHC (-), 5th Bn 112th AR
Det 1, HHC, 5th Bn 112th AR
Co B, 5th Bn 112th AR
Co C, 5th Bn 112th AR
Co C 372d Fwd Spt Bn
Det 1, 736th Maint Co
HHC (-), 3d Bn 144th Inf
Det 1, HHC 3d Bn 144th Inf
Co A, 3d Bn 144th Inf
Co B (-), 3d Bn 144th Inf
Det 1, Co B, 3d Bn 144th Inf
UIC
______
WPD1T0
WPDIT1
WPD1B0
WPD1C0
WV56C0
WVMLA1
WPEBT0
WPEBT1
WPEBA0
WPEBB0
WPEBB1
Co C, 3d Bn 144th Inf
HHC, 1st Bn 112th AR
Co A, 1st Bn 112th AR
Co B, 1sr Bn 112th AR
Co C, 1st Bn 112th AR
Troop I, 124th Calvary (BRT)
HHC, 72d Bde
Co B, 536th Sig Bn
449th Per Svc Det
WPEPC0
WPDXT0
WPDXA0
WPDXB0
WPDXC0
WPTWAA
WQSFAA
WBEFBO
WQHRAA
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
17375LNG04
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
161
85
66
63
255
95
158
104
63
105
41
4036
46349LNG03
07245LNG05
97
36
39
28
79
68
102
49
63
45
17
146
103
282
204
72
23
72
32
72
36
49
49
88
115
159
95
0 _______
0
_______
2,136
1,280
Assigned/Authorized: 59%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
AUTHORIZED
__________
16
6
1
1
1
__________
ACTUAL
______
16
6
1
1
1
__________
TOTALS
25
25
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
240
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Camp Maxey
Powderly, Texas
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Combat Pistol/Military Pistol Qualifi
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
178
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
480267
2,500
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Stationary Infantry Target Empl
Lane Markers
Limit Markers
Data Wire/Junction Box
Power Center Transformer Panel
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Site Imp(
475) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
EA
EA
EA
LN
LN
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
105
15
4
15
15
------
-----
UNIT COST
COST ($000)
3,288
240.00
930.00
12,362
4,006
-----
1,398
(345)
(4)
(4)
(185)
(60)
(800)
932
(45)
(100)
(475)
(312)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
2,330
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
117
_________
SUBTOTAL
2,447
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
73
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
2,520
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
2,500
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(1,068)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Construct a Combat Pistol/Military Pistol
Qualification Course. Targetry and instrumentation system will be funded by
other procurment, Army (OPA) appropriations. Access for individuals with
disabilities is not required.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
15 FP ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
15 FP
________
PROJECT: Construct a Combat Pistol/Military Police Qualification Course
________
Range. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
This project is required to support individual weapons
____________
familiarization and qualification requirements of all personnel (2089)
assigned to units within a 2 hours travel distance during inactive duty
training periods and will save annual training time for collective training.
This range will be constructed on State land.
CURRENT SITUATION:
There are no other ranges within 2 hours travel distance
__________________
that meet qualification standards. Individual pistol qualification is
currently being accomplished on a non-automated stand alone 25 meter static
pistol course. This range does not provide the realism in training required to
meet combat training objectives. The nearest range facility that meets current
requirements is located on Fort Wolters, which is a 4.5-hour drive from this
location.
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
241
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Maxey
Powderly, Texas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combat Pistol/Military Pistol Qualification Cours
480267
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
Downrange Electrical
Trenching Power/Communication
Range Operations & Control Area
Range Tower
Firing Berm/Foxhole/Defilade
SDD and EPAct05
LS
LS
LS
m2 (SF)
LN
LS
Unit
COST
QUANTITY
---23.78 (
15 ---
256)
Cost
($000)
-(472)
-(34)
-(83)
5,932
(141)
3,322
(50)
-(20)
_________
Total
800
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
If this project is not provided personnel will
_______________________
continue to train on inadequate ranges. The alternative (traveling to Fort
Wolters) will result in increased costs and loss of training time. Overall
readiness will be degraded regardless of the alternative used.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. The Deputy Assistant Secretary
of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project has been
considered for joint use potential. Mission requirements, operational
considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other components.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
(3)
PAGE NO. 242
NOV 2007
_________
100
_________
100
_________
100
_________
MAY 2008
_________
OCT 2008
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
($000)
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications.......... _________
(b) All Other Design Costs.......................... _________
104
(c) Total Design Cost............................... _________
104
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Maxey
Powderly, Texas
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combat Pistol/Military Pistol Qualification Cours
480267
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(d) Contract........................................ _________
69
(e) In-house........................................ _________
35
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
NOV 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
JUN 2011
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
ATS TARGETRY
OPA
2010
TOTAL
1,068
______
1,068
CFMO Name: LTC TIMOTHY SENECAUT
Phone Number: 512-782-5392
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 243
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 244
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Joint Forces HQs
INSNO= VQA15
COST INDEX
St Croix, Virgin Islands (U.S.)
1.36
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times a month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Estate Bethlehem, V
14.00 miles Armory
5,792 m2 (62,340 SF)
1990
ARNG
Estate Mannings Bay
12.00 miles AAOF
1,394 m2 (15,000 SF)
1985
ARNG
Estate Hams Bluff,
15.00 miles RTI
1,825 m2 (19,647 SF)
198
ARNG
Estate mannings Bay
15.00 miles Comm Air Wing
929 m2 (10,000 SF)
1986
,
.00 miles
929 m2 (10,000 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
17180 Readiness Center (JFHQ)
SCOPE
_____
6,721 m2
(72,340 SF)
($000)
______
25,000
START
CMPL
_____
____
OCT 2007 JAN 2009
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
12 FEB 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
17180
17120
17180
Armory Modernization
RTI Modernization
Armory Modernization
74 m2
3,547 m2
74 m2
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(800 SF)
(38,176 SF)
(800 SF)
250
8,170
250
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 01 JUL 2007
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
128
128
47
47
56
56
25
25
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
115
115
55
55
60
60
PAGE NO. 245
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Joint Forces HQs
St Croix, Virgin Islands (U.S.)
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
HEADQUARTERS TARC-VING
AIR GUARD
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= VQA15
UIC
______
W7P4AA
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
105
105
10 _______
10
_______
115
115
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
ACTUAL
______
25
__________
TOTALS
25
25
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
246
AUTHORIZED
__________
25
__________
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Joint Forces HQs
St Croix, Virgin Islands (U.S.)
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Readiness Center (JFHQ)
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
520034
25,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center (JFHQ)
Energy Management Control Syste
Flammable Material Storehouse,
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
Building Information Systems
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
456) Demo(
)
Information Systems
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2 (SF)
LS
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
6,711 (
-9.29 (
-----------
UNIT COST
72,240)
100)
2,801
-2,715
-----------
COST ($000)
19,481
(18,797)
(188)
(25)
(188)
(282)
(1)
4,089
(890)
(537)
(847)
(456)
(1)
(192)
(1,166)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
23,570
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,179
_________
SUBTOTAL
24,749
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
742
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
25,491
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
25,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(1,352)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed readiness center of
permanent masonry type construction, brick and concrete block units with
concrete floors, and a single membrane roof. A one-story structure with
mechanical and electrical equipment. Outside supporting facilities include
military and privately-owned vehicle parking, fencing, unheated equipment and
military vehicle storage, controlled waste storage, sidewalks, exterior fire
protection, outside lighting, access roads, detached facility sign, wash
platform, and flagpole. Physical security measures will be incorporated into
design including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas,
and vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent
access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy
conserving features will be incorporated into design, including direct digital
control systems and high efficiency motors, lighting, and HVAC systems. Air
conditioning: 14 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
6,721 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project is to provide a 106-person readiness center of
________
permanent type construction to serve the peace time missions of the assigned
unit. The space will permit all personnel to perform the necessary tasks that
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
247
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Joint Forces HQs
St Croix, Virgin Islands (U.S.)
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center (JFHQ)
520034
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
will improve the unit s readiness posture. The site of the project is on state
land.
(Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
A 4,620 SM (49,723 SF) readiness center is required to
____________
adequately provide the units housed in this facility with administrative,
supply, classroom, locker, latrine, and kitchen space.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The individuals assigned to this facility drill in an
__________________
admin building converted for use as a Headquarters. There are no classroom and
supply or storage areas for use by the soldiers. There is no assembly hall or
dining facility and POV parking is limited. The existing building is 33,123 SF
less than the space required to adequately house the Unit.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The units’ ability to meet its readiness, recruiting
_______________________
and retention, and training objectives will continue to be adversely affected
if the personnel are not provided with the proper facilities that they
critically need. If this project is not approved and funded for FY 2005, the
State may withdraw the matching funds. Delays in the funding of this project
will force the continued use of inadequate facilities and the present
facilities’ deficiencies will continue to negatively impact troop readiness
and morale. The lack of adequate latrines, training, storage and
administrative areas will continue to impair unit maintenance training and the
attainment of required mobilization readiness levels for this unit. This will
force the National Guard to seek a new appropriation and start the funding
process all over again, which could delay this project for several years.
ADDITIONAL:
This project has been coordinated with the installation
___________
physical security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All
required antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods
of meeting this requirement have been explored during project development.
This project is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy
Assistant Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that
this project has been considered for joint use potential. Mission
requirements, operational considerations, and location are incompatible with
use by other components.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
PAGE NO. 248
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
OCT 2007
_________
100
_________
100
_________
100
_________
JAN 2008
_________
JAN 2009
_________
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Joint Forces HQs
St Croix, Virgin Islands (U.S.)
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center (JFHQ)
520034
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
2,150
_________
2,150
_________
1,433
_________
717
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
NOV 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
MAY 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
Telcom
ESS
Kitchen Equip
OPA
OPA
OPA
2012
2012
2012
TOTAL
522
730
100
______
1,352
CFMO Name: LTC AUBREY RUAN
Phone Number: 340-712-7721
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 249
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 250
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Camp Murray
INSNO= 53555
COST INDEX
Tacoma, Washington
1.12
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Camp Murray, WA
.50 miles HQ WAARNG
21 m2 (226 SF)
1903
USAR
Fort Lewis, WA
1.50 miles USAR Center
4,181 m2 (45,000 SF)
USAR
Tacoma, WA
8.00 miles USAR Center
2,323 m2 (25,000 SF)
Fort Lewis, WA
1.50 miles AFRC
5,388 m2 (58,000 SF)
USA
Fort Lewis, WA
.00 miles Active Instalaltio
26,477 m2 (285,000 SF)
USA
McChord, WA
3.00 miles
8,919 m2 (96,000 SF)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
SCOPE
_____
($000)
______
START
_____
CMPL
____
21419 Combined Support Maintenance
7,284 m2
(78,402 SF)
25,000 OCT 2007 JUL 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
05 JAN 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
17180
17180
AVN BDE Readiness Center
Information Operations Readiness Center
10,670 m2
7,498 m2
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(114,850 SF)
(80,713 SF)
26,000
23,828
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 31 JUL 2005
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
106
106
0
0
0
0
106
106
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
5,952
6,353
821
690
5,131
5,663
PAGE NO. 251
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Murray
Tacoma, Washington
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 53555
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
HHC 81ST
66TH AVN
96TH TROOP COMMAND
205TH TRAINING REGIMENT (LEADERSHIP)
JFHQ-WA
10TH CIVIL SUPPORT TEAM (WMD)
RECRUITING AND RETENTION
UIC
______
WQYQAA
WYHUAA
W8BLAA
W8FFAA
W8BLAA
W7LLAA
W77752
TSPN
____
14081
31137
56751
66751
56751
56951
MTOE/TDA
________
87102LNG04
01402ANG01
NGW79AAA
11445LNG01
NGW8BLAA
NGW7LLAA
NGW777AA
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
2,861
3,594
626
594
2,061
1,697
101
99
211
257
22
13
70 _______
99
_______
5,952
6,353
Assigned/Authorized: 106%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
39
0
0
1
0
0
__________
ACTUAL
______
1,072
479
67
152
49
54
__________
TOTALS
40
1,873
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
252
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Camp Murray
Tacoma, Washington
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
214
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
530022
25,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Combined Support Maintenance Sh
Flammable Materials Facility
Controlled Waste Facility
Unheated Metal Storage Building
Energy Management Control Syste
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp(
530) Demo(
865)
Information Systems
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
6,796
46.45
46.45
394.84
(
(
(
(
--
---------
UNIT COST
73,152)
500)
500)
4,250)
2,382
842.52
617.76
730.22
--
---------
COST ($000)
17,590
(16,191)
(39)
(29)
(288)
(469)
(574)
5,817
(301)
(753)
(1,445)
(147)
(1,395)
(1)
(42)
(1,733)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
23,407
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
1,170
_________
SUBTOTAL
24,577
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
737
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
25,314
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
25,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. Constructing a new Combined Support
Maintenance Shop (CSMS) with three Organizational Maintenance Shops that s
directly tied to the Army Campaign Plan. The facility will be constructed of
permanent masonry type wall construction, with a single ply or sloped standing
seam roofing system, concrete floors and cost effective and energy efficient
mechanical and electrical equipment, an energy management system, and
emergency power generation backup will be incorporated into the design.
Supporting facilities will include 11 support level maintenance (sustainment)
work bays, 6 special purpose work bays, administrative and employee support
areas, military vehicle and POV parking, access roads and associated support
activities. Extension of existing roads and gas, electric, sewer, water and
communication utilities on the building site will be necessary. Physical
security measures will be incorporated into design including maximum feasible
standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas,
berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent access when standoff
distance cannot be maintained.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: Construct a new Combined Support Maintenance Shop (CSMS) combines
________
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
253
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Murray
Tacoma, Washington
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
530022
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
LS
QUANTITY
---
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
--Total
(324)
(250)
_________
574
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
surface maintenance activities currently performed at four separate facilities
(CSMS and three OMS’s) which is directly tied to the Army Campaign Plan. The
current facilities are all within close proximity of each other. The new
Combined Support Maintenance Shop and the supporting infrastructure are to be
constructed on a new 27 acre site, located at the Logistics Center, Fort
Lewis, Washington. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
The new CSMS facility is required to provide field and
____________
sustainment (organizational, direct and general support) maintenance
activities on tracked, wheeled vehicles and other WAARNG equipment. The CSMS
(ARNG TDA maintenance facility) provides full-time support to the WAARNG. The
facility will consist of sustainment maintenance & special purpose work bays,
secure supply & parts storage areas, Basic Items Issue area, technical, admin
& personnel support areas, impervious vehicle parking and support items (wash
racks, loading ramps, etc). No other adequate facilities are available to
support the units. This facility is directly tied to the Army Campaign Plan.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The current CSMS facility (three building complex) was
__________________
built in 1954 on Camp Murray, it’s in poor condition, does not meet current
building codes or National Guard Bureau criteria. It’s 1/3rd of the size
authorized to support the mission, limiting the throughput of work, thus
affecting the readiness of the supported units. The facilities have been
improved and upgrade over time and it is structurally and economically
infeasible to continue to alter or upgrade to meet current mission
requirements. Military parking area and access roads are unpaved and poorly
drained, causing both safety hazards and a potential environmental
violation(s).
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
If the project is not approved, the present
_______________________
facility’s lack of adequate space will continue to reduce maintenance
efficiency, causing training and mobilization readiness standards to decline
and will continue the potential for personnel accidents and environmental
violations. The CSMS and OMS staff continues to put 110% effort toward an ever
increasing operational tempo for the supported units but are severely hampered
by the lack of adequate facilities to accomplish the mission. If the
requirement for the new CSMS is not met, the impact on the readiness of the
Washington Army National Guard will be extremely detrimental. Will not be able
to support the Army Campaign Plan.
PAGE NO. 254
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Murray
Tacoma, Washington
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
530022
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. Mission requirements, operational
considerations, and location are incompatible with use by other components.
Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will
be integrated into the design, development, and construction of the project in
accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable
laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
OCT 2007
_________
65
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
JUL 2010
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
1,425
_________
713
_________
2,138
_________
1,425
_________
713
_________
PAGE NO. 255
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Camp Murray
Tacoma, Washington
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Combined Support Maintenance Shop
530022
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (CONTINUED)
_______________________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: COL DUANE COFFEY
Phone Number: 253 512-8811
PAGE NO. 256
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
West Virginia ARNG
INSNO= WVARNG
COST INDEX
West Virginia
.93
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Elkins, WV
65.00 miles Armory
1,626 m2 (17,500 SF)
1962
ARNG
Kiser, WV
36.00 miles Armory
1,186 m2 (12,762 SF)
1962
ARNG
Martinsburg, WV
69.00 miles Armory
1,362 m2 (14,662 SF)
1976
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 Readiness Center
3,977 m2
(42,810 SF)
14,200 JUN 2007 APR 2009
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
15
MAY 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
Land for the project will be acquired by the state of West Virginia. Ownership
will be transfered to the Army National Guard by 1 October 2010
25.00
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
17180
17180
17180
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readinesss Center
7,498
7,498
7,498
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(80,713 SF)
(80,713 SF)
(80,713 SF)
22,000
10,000
14,286
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 11 JAN 2005
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
7
4
0
0
6
3
1
1
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
81
20
2
1
79
19
PAGE NO. 257
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
West Virginia ARNG
West Virginia
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= WVARNG
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
DET 1, 157TH MP GUARD CO (CS)
UIC
______
WP4VAA
TSPN ________
MTOE/TDA
____
31925 19477LNG01
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
81 _______
20
_______
81
20
Assigned/Authorized: 24%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
AUTHORIZED
__________
25
9
2
__________
ACTUAL
______
25
9
2
__________
TOTALS
36
36
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
258
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
West Virginia ARNG
West Virginia
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Readiness Center
6.CATEGORY CODE
050589A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
540084
14,200
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Readiness Center
Flammable Materials Faility
Controlled Waste Facility
Unheated Metal Storage Building
Energy Management Control Syste
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Storm Drainage
Site Imp( 2,272) Demo(
)
Information Systems
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
3,817
18.58
27.87
113.43
(
(
(
(
--
---------
UNIT COST
41,089)
200)
300)
1,221)
COST ($000)
1,817
1,055
964.80
1,178
--
---------
7,648
(6,938)
(20)
(27)
(134)
(70)
(459)
5,397
(640)
(185)
(1,213)
(42)
(2,272)
(1)
(561)
(483)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
13,045
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
652
_________
SUBTOTAL
13,697
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
411
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
14,108
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
14,200
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $0.800 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed Readiness Center of
permanent masonry type construction, with standing seam roof, concrete floors
and mechanical and electrical equipment with emergency power generator backup.
A multi-level structure with mechanical and electrical equipment service each
area independently. Outside supporting facilities include military and
privately-owned vehicle parking, fencing, sidewalks, exterior fire protection,
outside lighting, access roads, detached facility sign, wash platform,
fuel-dispensing & storage system, and flagpole. Physical security measures
will be incorporated into the design, including maximum stand-off distances
from roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas. Berms, heavy
landscaping, and bollards will be used to prevent access when stand-off
distance cannot be maintained. Cost efficient energy consternating features
will be incorporated into the design, including energy management control
systems and high efficiency motors, lighting, and HVAC systems.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
3,977 m2 ADQT:
1,528 m2 SUBSTD:
1,356 m2
________
PROJECT: This project is to provide a multi-story readiness center of
________
permanent type construction to serve the peacetime missions of the assigned
units. The space will permit all personnel to perform the necessary tasks to
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
259
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
West Virginia ARNG
West Virginia
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
540084
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
LS
QUANTITY
---
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
--Total
(125)
(334)
_________
459
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
improve the unit s readiness posture. The new Readiness Center will be
constructed jointly with the City of Moorefield / Hardy County, West Virginia.
The intent is to construct a combined ARNG Readiness Center and Visitor’s
Center / Historic Museum for the County. The site for the Facility lies
adjacent to Corridor ’H’ (a new interstate highway currently under
construction which will connect the northeastern portion of West Virginia to
interstate 81 in Virginia). The project site is on state owned land. (New
Mission)
(New Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
This facility is required to house elements of the 154th
____________
Military Police Guard Unit with a required strength of 81 personnel. The
readiness center will provide the necessary administrative, training, storage
and parking areas required to achieve proficiency in required training tasks.
A 50 acre site (state-owned) is currently being acquired for this
project.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The current WVARNG Military Police Guard Unit is located
__________________
in a single-story masonry building leased, by the WVARNG, from the City of
Moorefield- approximately one mile from the proposed new site. The Facility is
totally inadequate to fully support the 55 personnel currently stationed
there, and cannot in any way support two Units of 81 personnel. The current
facility lacks sufficient area in all authorized categories, and is void of
any Anti-Terrorism and Force protection protective measures. With the
construction of a new Readiness Center, the National Guard will vacate the
existing Facility and terminate the lease.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The Units’ ability to meet their readiness,
_______________________
recruiting & retention, and training objectives will continue to be adversely
affected if the personnel are not provided with facilities adequate for their
needs. The current facility cannot support the number of personnel scheduled
for the new readiness center. Delays in the funding of this project will force
the continued use of an inadequate facility; which will continue to negatively
impact troop readiness, training and morale. The lack of proper and sufficient
training, storage and administrative areas will continue to impair the
attainment of required mobilization readiness levels.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
PAGE NO. 260
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
West Virginia ARNG
West Virginia
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
540084
ADDITIONAL:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
JUN 2007
_________
100
_________
_________
_________
SEP 2008
_________
APR 2009
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
871
_________
49,129
_________
50,000
_________
_________
50,000
_________
PAGE NO. 261
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
West Virginia ARNG
West Virginia
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
540084
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (CONTINUED)
_______________________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: LTC DAVID SHAFER
Phone Number: 304 561-6450
PAGE NO. 262
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Morgantown Readiness Center
INSNO= 54B00
COST INDEX
Morgantown, West Virginia
.94
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Camp Dawson, WV
30.00 miles AFRC/RTI/ATS
18,581 m2 (200,000 SF)
1998
ARNG
Fairmont, WV
30.00 miles Armory
2,713 m2 (29,200 SF)
1963
ARNG
Wheeling, WV
85.00 miles Armory/AASF
6,122 m2 (65,900 SF)
1995
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
17180 Readiness Center
8,934 m2
(96,165 SF)
21,000 OCT 2008 DEC 2009
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
15
MAR 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
The WVARNG acting through the State has executed an agreement with the City of
Morgatown to acquire the property through an exchange of the existing Morgantown
Armory (54B00) concurrent with MCCA execution.
35.00
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
17180
17180
17180
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
Readiness Center
7,498
7,498
7,498
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(80,713 SF)
(80,713 SF)
(80,713 SF)
15,000
10,000
14,186
0
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 05 FEB 2007
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
33
33
6
6
24
24
3
3
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
328
328
24
24
304
304
PAGE NO. 263
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Morgantown Readiness Center
Morgantown, West Virginia
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
AREA SUPPORT MEDICAL DETACHMENT
249TH ARMY BAND
B BATTERY, 1-201ST FIELD ARTILLERY
RECRUITING AND RETENTION
LINE CO, 3RD BATTALION, 25TH MARINE CORPS RESER
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 54B00
UIC
______
G08851
WQK1AA
WP43B0
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
08753A000
12113LNG02
06455ANG07
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
42
42
41
41
102
102
3
3
140 _______
140
_______
328
328
Assigned/Authorized: 100%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
HEMTT PLS/HET
WHEELED
AUTHORIZED
__________
25
18
12
9
4
3
__________
ACTUAL
______
25
18
12
9
4
3
__________
TOTALS
71
71
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
264
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Morgantown Readiness Center
Morgantown, West Virginia
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Readiness Center
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
171
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
540068
21,000
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Reserve Center Building
Controlled Waste Handling Facil
Unheated Metal Storage Building
Energy Mangement Control System
SDD and EPAct05
Antiterrorism Measures
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
605) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2 (SF)
m2 (SF)
m2 (SF)
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
QUANTITY
8,675 (
27.87 (
231.33 (
----------
UNIT COST
93,375)
300)
2,490)
1,568
527.66
727.85
----------
COST ($000)
14,518
(13,599)
(15)
(168)
(130)
(252)
(354)
5,324
(891)
(1,401)
(1,455)
(605)
(235)
(737)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
19,842
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
992
_________
SUBTOTAL
20,834
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
625
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
21,459
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
21,000
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $1,000 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. A specially designed Armed Forces Reserve
Center of permanent masonry type construction, brick and concrete block units
with concrete floors, and a metal or single membrane roof. A two-story
structure with mechanical and electrical equipment. Outside supporting
facilities include military and privately-owned vehicle parking, fencing,
sidewalks, exterior fire protection, outside lighting, access roads, detached
facility sign, wash platforms, fuel storage and dispensing systems, and
flagpole. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design
including maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and
vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent
access when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Cost effective energy
conserving features will be incorporated into design, including energy
management control systems and high efficiency motors, lighting, and HVAC
systems. Air conditioning: 100 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
8,934 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: This project provides a Joint Armed Forces Reserve Center, of
________
permanent type construction, to serve the peacetime missions of the assigned
units and space for all personnel to perform the necessary tasks that will
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
265
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Morgantown Readiness Center
Morgantown, West Virginia
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
540068
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
improve the units’ readiness posture. (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
This facility is required to house all elements of the Area
____________
Support Medical Detachment, 249th Army Band, Battery B, 1-201st Field
Artillery, and Company K (Line) 3rd Battalion, 25th Marine Corps Reserve. The
two Facilities these Units currently occupy are inadequate due to size
limitations on square footage and military parking. They lack sufficient area
in training, administrative, storage, and maintenance necessary for the Units
to train affectively. Currently, the State is in the process of acquiring 30
acres of state owned property for the construction of the
Facility.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The 249th Army band and B Battery, 1-201 FA is currently
__________________
located in an existing armory in Morgantown, WV. This Facility was constructed
in 1972 and is some 31 years old. The existing Armory is land-locked and
offers no area for expansion. The Facility lacks sufficient administrative,
storage, training and maintenance area to serve a single Unit, let alone two.
There is no area for a military band to either store instruments, or practice.
The Marine Corps Reserve Line Co. is currently housed in Moundsville, West
Virginia in a leased Facility which does not offer adequate administrative or
vehicle maintenance areas. The Area Medical Support Detachment is a new Unit
scheduled to come on-line in 2005, and has no stationing Facility
identified.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The units’ ability to meet their readiness,
_______________________
recruiting and retention, and training objectives will continue to be
adversely affected if the personnel are not provided with adequate facilities.
Delays in the funding of this project will force the continued use of
inadequate facilities and the present facilities’ deficiencies will continue
to negatively impact troop readiness and morale. The lack of proper and
adequate training, storage and administrative areas will continue to impair
the attainment of required mobilization readiness levels for both the National
Guard and Marine Reserve units.
ADDITIONAL: The most similar DoD standards for readiness center construction
___________
do not address all of the current criteria incorporated in the Army National
Guard Readiness Center design and thus do not yield accurate cost estimates.
Therefore, state historical costs for construction of like facilities were
used to develop baseline unit cost and were adjusted for size, fiscal year and
location. This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. The Deputy Assistant
Secretary of the Army (Installations and Housing) certifies that this project
has been considered for joint use potential. The facility will be available
for use by other components. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle
cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and
PAGE NO. 266
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Morgantown Readiness Center
Morgantown, West Virginia
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
540068
ADDITIONAL:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
construction of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC
2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
OCT 2008
_________
35
_________
_________
_________
JUN 2009
_________
DEC 2009
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
OCT 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
MAR 2012
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
750
_________
375
_________
1,125
_________
1,125
_________
_________
PAGE NO. 267
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Morgantown Readiness Center
Morgantown, West Virginia
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Readiness Center
540068
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (CONTINUED)
_______________________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: LTC DAVID SHAFER
Phone Number: 304 561-6450
PAGE NO. 268
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Madison Army Aviation Support Facili
INSNO= 55B36
COST INDEX
Madison, Wisconsin
1.06
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Madison, WI
.20 miles Armory
6,122
(65,900 )
1989
ARNG
Madison, WI
.50 miles Armory
6,122
(65,900 )
1940
ARNG
Madison, WI
.50 miles Armory
6,122
(65,900 )
1994
ARNG
Madison, WI
.50 miles Armory
6,122
(65,900 )
1956
ARNG
Madison, WI
.10 miles AASF
6,122
(65,900 )
1940
ARNG
Madison, WI
.10 miles AASF Hangar
6,122
(65,900 )
1981
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
________
SCOPE
_____
($000)
______
START
_____
CMPL
____
11320 Aircraft Parking
1,175 m2
(12,652 SF)
5,700 JUL 2007 JUL 2008
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
11 FEB 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
0
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
17180
Readiness Center Add/Alt
7,498
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
(80,713 SF)
5,162
1,160
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 18 JUL 2005
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
19
13
2
2
17
11
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
242
228
58
44
184
184
PAGE NO. 269
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Madison Army Aviation Support Facili
Madison, Wisconsin
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
HQS, HQS CO., 1/147TH AVIATION BN
COMPANY A, 1/147TH AVIAITION BN
COMPANY C, 1/147TH AVIATION BN
COMPANY D, 1/147TH AVIATION BN
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 55B36
UIC
______
WTQZT0
WTQZA0
WTQZC0
WTQZD0
TSPN
____
2049
2049
2049
2049
MTOE/TDA
________
01615ANG01
01615ANG01
01615ANG01
01615ANG01
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
120
115
35
30
35
29
52 _______
54
_______
242
228
Assigned/Authorized: 94%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
C-26
UH-60
AUTHORIZED
__________
50
43
1
8
1
16
__________
ACTUAL
______
50
43
1
8
1
16
__________
TOTALS
119
119
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
270
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Madison Army Aviation Support Facility
Madison, Wisconsin
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
Rotary Wing Parking Apron
7.PROJECT NUMBER
113
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
550139
5,700
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
QUANTITY
UNIT COST
COST ($000)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
715) Demo(
)
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
------
------
5,305
(351)
(180)
(3,993)
(715)
(66)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
5,305
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
265
_________
SUBTOTAL
5,570
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
167
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
5,737
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
5,700
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
At the existing Army Aviation Support Facility
remove and replace 179,891 SF of existing pavement, and construct 1,520,091 SF
of new outside supporting facilities which are rigid and flexible paving for
aircraft parking/tie down pads, ground support equipment, hover lanes, landing
pad, taxiways, access roads, hangar aprons, airfield lighting, exterior
security lighting, pavement markings, and utilities. Force protection measures
will be incorporated into design including maximum feasible standoff distance
from roads, parking areas, and vehicle unloading areas, berms, heavy
landscaping, and bollards to prevent access when standoff distance cannot be
maintained. Air conditioning: 56 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
1,175 m2 ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: To remove and replace 179,891 SF of existing pavement, and construct
________
1,520,091 SF of new outside supporting facilities which are rigid and flexible
paving for aircraft parking/tie down pads, ground support equipment, hover
lanes, landing pad, taxiways, access roads, hangar aprons, airfield lighting,
exterior security lighting, pavement markings, and utilities. This project
will provide the required outside supporting facilities needed by the 1/147th
Aviation Bn to support ARNG aviation activates, achieve proficiency in
required training tasks, and will allow the 115th FW to complete their Fighter
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
271
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Madison Army Aviation Support Facili
Madison, Wisconsin
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Rotary Wing Parking Apron
550139
PROJECT: (CONTINUED)
_____________________
Aircraft Alert Complex (XGFG 029061) and Extend Taxiway G and Arm/Disarm Pad
(XGFG 959602) projects. (Current Mission) (Current Mission)
REQUIREMENT:
A 582,200 SF Rotary Wing Parking Apron, 22,500 SF Rotary Wing
____________
Landing Pad, 4,000 SF of Taxiways and Access Roads, 149,538 SF of Hangar
Apron, lighting, markings, and utilities.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The existing outside supporting facilities at the Madison
__________________
AASF is severely under sized, in need of major repair/replacement, and do not
meet current criteria. The existing outside supporting facilities is comprised
of 179,891 SF of flexible/rigid pavement which is only 21 percent of the
authorized 862,086 SF and only provides parking for four of the authorized 16
aircraft. The Annual OHSA report has rated these facilities as being
substandard and a RAC 2 rating. There are numerous potholes and cracks were
broken pieces of flexible or rigid pavement ranging from 1/4" to 1" in size
have become foreign object damage from rotor/prop wash to both aircraft and
personnel. Also, the present configuration of the very limited outside
supporting facilities is in conflict with the 115th FW, Wisconsin Air National
Guard’s and the Dane County Regional Airport’s Master Plan and do not support
the Fighter Aircraft Alert Complex (XGFG 029061) and Extend Taxiway G and
Arm/Disarm Pad (XGFG 959602) projects.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
Without this project the units of this Battalion
_______________________
would be required to continue to operate under conditions impacting adversely
on achieving and maintaining required levels of mission readiness. Continued
use of these outside supporting facilities causes an increased risk of
potential injury to military/civilian personnel and damage to state and
federal property. In addition, without this project the 115th FW will not be
able to complete the Fighter Aircraft Alert Complex (XGFG 029061) and Extend
Taxiway G and Arm/Disarm Pad (XGFG 959602) projects.
ADDITIONAL: The most similar DoD standards for readiness center construction
___________
do not address all of the current criteria incorporated in the Army National
Guard Army Aviation Support Facility (AASF) design and thus do not yield
accurate cost estimates. Therefore, state historical costs for construction of
like facilities were used to develop baseline unit cost and were adjusted for
size, fiscal year and location. The State Guard/Reserve Forces Facilities
Board certifies that this project has been considered for joint use potential.
Unilateral construction is recommended. The reasons for this recommendation
are there are no other reserve or active Department of Defense entities
located within reasonable travel distance and local area demographics can not
support additional requirements. This project has been coordinated with the
installation physical security plan, and all physical security measures are
included. All required antiterrorism protection measures are included.
Alternative methods of meeting this requirement have been explored during
project development. This project is the only feasible option to meet the
requirement. Sustainable principles, to include Life Cycle cost-effective
practices, will be integrated into the design, development, and construction
PAGE NO. 272
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Madison Army Aviation Support Facili
Madison, Wisconsin
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Rotary Wing Parking Apron
550139
ADDITIONAL:
(CONTINUED)
__________________________
of the project in accordance with Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and
other applicable laws and Executive Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
DD
JUL 2007
_________
35
_________
_________
_________
JAN 2008
_________
JUL 2008
_________
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
OCT 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
OCT 2012
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
($000)
_________
541
_________
541
_________
541
_________
_________
PAGE NO. 273
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Madison Army Aviation Support Facili
Madison, Wisconsin
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Rotary Wing Parking Apron
550139
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (CONTINUED)
_______________________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name: LTC DANIEL PULERVERMACHER
Phone Number: 608 242-3365
PAGE NO. 274
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4. AREA CONSTRUCTION
Laramie Readiness Center
INSNO= 56A65
COST INDEX
Laramie, Wyoming
1.01
5. FREQUENCY AND TYPE OF UTILIZATION
Normal administration five days per week, with a two-day training assembly two or three times per month.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
6. OTHER ACTIVE/GUARD/RESERVE INSTALLATIONS WITHIN 15 MILE RADIUS
ARNG
Laramie, WY
9.00 miles Armory
2,992 m2 (32,207 SF)
1959
ARNG
Cheyenne, WV
55.00 miles AASF
2,544 m2 (27,379 SF)
1980
ARNG
Cheyenne, WV
55.00 miles Readiness Center
2,137 m2 (23,000 SF)
1983
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
7. PROJECTS REQUESTED IN THIS PROGRAM:
CATEGORY
COST
DESIGN STATUS
_____________
CODE _____________
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
START
CMPL
________
_____
______
_____
____
21407 Field Maintenance Shop
3,768 m2
(40,554 SF)
14,400 OCT 2007 SEP 2010
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. STATE GUARD/RESERVE FORCES FACILITIES BOARD RECOMMENDATION
FACILITIES IDENTIFIED IN ITEM #6 HAVE BEEN EXAMINED BY THE STATE RESERVE FORCES
20
FEB 2009
___________
FACILITIES BOARD FOR POSSIBLE JOINT USE/EXPANSION. THE BOARD RECOMMENDATIONS ARE
(Date)
UNILATERAL CONSTRUCTION.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
9. LAND ACQUISITION REQUIRED
NONE
50.00
_________________
(Number of acres)
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
10. PROJECTS PLANNED IN NEXT FOUR YEARS
CATEGORY
COST
CODE
PROJECT TITLE
SCOPE
($000)
________
_____________
_____
______
FY 09 Cheyenne AASF
FY 04 Camp Guernsey - Land Acquisition
FY 05 Camp Guernsey - Educational Facilities
DEFERRED SUSTAINMENT, RESTORATION, AND MODERNIZATION (SRM):
7,498
7,498
7,498
(80,713 SF)
(80,713 SF)
(80,713 SF)
38,000
9,600
64,000
105
A SITE SURVEY HAS BEEN COMPLETED AND THE SITE IS SUITABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF THE PROPOSED PROJECT AT
THE ESTIMATED COST INDICATED.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
11. PERSONNEL STRENGTH AS OF 08 NOV 2007
PERMANENT
___________________________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED ________
CIVILIAN
_____
_______
AUTHORIZED
ACTUAL
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s1
20
20
4
4
16
16
0
0
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
GUARD/RESERVE
_____________________________
TOTAL
OFFICER ________
ENLISTED
_____
_______
173
173
14
14
159
159
PAGE NO. 275
1. COMPONENT
ARNG
FY 2011 GUARD AND RESERVE
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION
3. INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Laramie Readiness Center
Laramie, Wyoming
12. RESERVE UNIT DATA
2. DATE
01 FEB 2010
INSNO= 56A65
UNIT DESIGNATION
________________
133RD ENGINEER COMPANY
94TH TRP CMD
111TH PRESS CAMP
UIC
______
WQQPAA
W8BUA1
TSPN
____
MTOE/TDA
________
05423LNG05
NGW79DAA
45423LNG04
STRENGTH
___________________
AUTHORIZED ______
ACTUAL
__________
161
158
12
15
8 _______
13
_______
181
186
Assigned/Authorized: 102%
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
13. MAJOR EQUIPMENT AND AIRCRAFT
TYPE
____
WHEELED
TRAILERS
TRACKED
EQUIPMENT > 30 FT
FUEL & M977 HEMTT
HEMTT PLS/HET
AUTHORIZED
__________
93
23
6
18
3
1
__________
ACTUAL
______
93
23
6
18
3
1
__________
TOTALS
144
144
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
14. OUTSTANDING POLLUTION AND SAFETY DEFICIENCIES
($000)
A. AIR POLLUTION
0
B. WATER POLLUTION
0
C. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
0
PAGE NO.
276
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED.
DD
FORM
MAY 78
1390s2
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Laramie Readiness Center
Laramie, Wyoming
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Field Maintenance Shop
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
214
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
560116
14,400
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
FMS Building
Flammable Materials Facility
Controlled Waste Facility
Motor Vehicle Storage Building
Unheated Metal Storage Building
Total from Continuation page
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
Electric Service
Water, Sewer, Gas
Paving, Walks, Curbs & Gutters
Site Imp(
483) Demo(
)
Information Systems
Antiterrorism Measures
Other
m2
m2
m2
m2
m2
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
LS
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
(SF)
QUANTITY
2,506
16.26
27.87
1,087
130.06
(
(
(
(
(
--------
UNIT COST
26,979)
175)
300)
11,700)
1,400)
COST ($000)
2,745
710.33
538.21
635.07
635.09
--------
8,104
(6,880)
(12)
(15)
(690)
(83)
(424)
5,190
(341)
(130)
(2,706)
(483)
(1)
(320)
(1,209)
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
13,294
CONTINGENCY (5.00%)
665
_________
SUBTOTAL
13,959
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (3.00%)
419
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
14,378
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
14,400
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
()
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Directed cost adjustment of $0.800 based on actual
construction cost de-escalation. Consists of a maintenance facility with three
(3) maintenance work bays, plus administrative, personnel, and work areas.
Constructed of masonry block with brick veneer, concrete floors, masonry block
partitions with a built-up or single membrane roofing system. Supporting
facilities include military and customer vehicle parking, fencing, wash
platform, fuel storage and dispensing system, lube & inspection rack, load
ramp, control waste handling facility, sidewalks, outside lighting, and access
roads. Physical security measures will be incorporated into design including
maximum feasible standoff distance from roads, parking areas, and vehicle
unloading areas, and berms, heavy landscaping, and bollards to prevent access
when standoff distance cannot be maintained. Air conditioning: 5 tons.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
2,695 m2 ADQT:
331 m2 SUBSTD:
2,364 m2
________
PROJECT: A new maintenance facility to provide adequate organizational
________
maintenance support for vehicles and equipment supported by this maintenance
shop. Site of project will be on state land.
(Current Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO.
277
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Laramie Readiness Center
Laramie, Wyoming
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Field Maintenance Shop
560116
9. COST ESTIMATES (CONTINUED)
______________________________
Item
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY (CONTINUED)
____________________________
Energy management Control Syste LS
SDD and EPAct05
LS
Antiterrorism Measures
LS
QUANTITY
----
Unit
COST
Cost
($000)
---Total
(35)
(127)
(262)
_________
424
REQUIREMENT:
A facility requirement for 2,695 SM (29,008 SF) is requested to
____________
permit efficient maintenance support at the organizational level to be
performed on vehicles authorized to the units which will be supported by this
maintenance shop.
CURRENT SITUATION:
The current facility is an overcrowded and substandard
__________________
maintenance shop. The existing shop, located in Laramie, Wyoming, was built in
1959 and is extremely outdated. Since the existing facility was constructed,
the missions have changed creating an increase in equipment and maintenance
requirements, causing a severe lack of functional space. Renovating the
existing building would not be economical due to its condition. In addition,
the existing facility would have to be completely altered and repaired, which
would be more costly since all of the offices, the latrine, and the work bays
(20x40) are too small and deteriorating.
IMPACT IF NOT PROVIDED:
The present facility’s deficiencies will continue to
_______________________
negatively impact troop morale. The lack of proper and adequate maintenance,
training, storage and administrative areas will continue to impair the
attainment of the units’ required mobilization readiness levels.
ADDITIONAL: This project has been coordinated with the installation physical
___________
security plan, and all physical security measures are included. All required
antiterrorism protection measures are included. Alternative methods of meeting
this requirement have been explored during project development. This project
is the only feasible option to meet the requirement. Sustainable principles,
to include Life Cycle cost-effective practices, will be integrated into the
design, development, and construction of the project in accordance with
Executive Order 13423, 10 USC 2802(c), and other applicable laws and Executive
Orders.
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
PAGE NO. 278
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
OCT 2007
_________
100
_________
_________
_________
JAN 2009
_________
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Laramie Readiness Center
Laramie, Wyoming
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Field Maintenance Shop
560116
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(f) Design Complete Date............................ _________
SEP 2010
(g) Type of Design Contract: Design-bid-build
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO) N
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
531
_________
531
_________
354
_________
177
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
NOV 2010
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
DEC 2010
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
APR 2012
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NA
CFMO Name: COL TAMMY MAAS
Phone Number: 307 772-5930
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 279
THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
PAGE NO. 280
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Minor Construction
Worldwide Various
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
000
11,400
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
UM (M/E)
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
UpSPECIFIED mINOR cONSTRUCTION
LS
QUANTITY
--
UNIT COST
--
COST ($000)
11,400
(11,400)
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
11,400
CONTINGENCY (.00 %)
0
_________
SUBTOTAL
11,400
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (.00 %)
0
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
11,400
TOTAL REQUEST (ROUNDED)
11,400
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Unspecified Minor Construction projects which have
a funded cost of $2,000,000 or less, including construction, alteration, or
conversion of permanent or temporary facilities as authorized under 10 USC
18233a(a)(1). The funded cost limit can be $3,000,000 if the project is
intended solely to correct a deficiency that is life threatening, health
threatening, or safety threatening.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: These unforeseen projects address high priorities such as critical
________
mission requirements, environmental protection, and life, health, and
safety-threatening conditions. These projects cannot wait until the next
annual budget submission. (Current Mission)
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
PAGE NO. 281
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Minor Construction
Worldwide Various
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
UNSPECIFIED MINOR CONSTRUCTION
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract:
(2)
_________
0
_________
_________
_________
_________
_________
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO)
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
_________
0
_________
_________
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name:
Phone Number:
PAGE NO. 282
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
4.PROJECT TITLE
Planning and Design
Worldwide Various
5.PROGRAM ELEMENT
Planning and Design
6.CATEGORY CODE
0505896A
7.PROJECT NUMBER
000
8.PROJECT COST ($000)
990034
25,663
9.COST ESTIMATES
ITEM
PRIMARY FACILITY
________________
Planning and Design
UM (M/E)
LS
QUANTITY
--
UNIT COST
--
COST ($000)
25,663
(25,663)
SUPPORTING FACILITIES
_____________________
ESTIMATED CONTRACT COST
25,663
CONTINGENCY (.00 %)
0
_________
SUBTOTAL
25,663
SUPV, INSP & OVERHEAD (.00 %)
0
_________
TOTAL REQUEST
25,663
INSTALLED EQT-OTHER APPROP
(0)
10.Description of Proposed Construction
Planning and Design funds provide for parametric,
concept, and final design of major and unspecified minor military construction
projects; value engineering; and the development of standards and criteria for
Army National Guard Projects. This included Growth of Force Planning and
Design.
________________________________________________________________________________
11. REQ:
NONE
ADQT:
NONE
SUBSTD:
NONE
________
PROJECT: (Current Mission)
________
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA:
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data:
(1) Status:
(a) Design Start Date...............................
(b) Percent Complete As Of 15 Sep 2009 (DSGN YR)....
(c) Percent Complete As Of 01 Jan 2010 (BDGT YR)....
(d) Percent Complete As Of 01 Oct 2010 (PROG YR)....
(e) Concept Complete Date...........................
(f) Design Complete Date............................
(g) Type of Design Contract:
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76
1391
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
_________
0
_________
_________
_________
_________
_________
PAGE NO. 283
1.COMPONENT
2.DATE
FY 2011
MILITARY CONSTRUCTION PROJECT DATA
ARNG
01 FEB 2010
3.INSTALLATION AND LOCATION
Planning and Design
Worldwide Various
4.PROJECT TITLE
5.PROJECT NUMBER
Planning and Design
990034
12. SUPPLEMENTAL DATA: (Continued)
_______________________
A. Estimated Design Data: (Continued)
(2)
Basis:
(a) Standard or Definitive Design - (YES/NO)
(b) Where Design Was Most Recently Used
(c)
Percentage of Design utilizing Standard Design.. _________
0
(3)
Total Design Cost (c) = (a)+(b) OR (d)+(e):
(a) Production of Plans and Specifications..........
(b) All Other Design Costs..........................
(c) Total Design Cost...............................
(d) Contract........................................
(e) In-house........................................
($000)
_________
_________
0
_________
_________
_________
(4)
Construction Contract Award.......................... _________
(5)
Construction Start................................... _________
(6)
Construction Completion.............................. _________
B. Equipment associated with this project which will be provided from
other appropriations:
Fiscal Year
Equipment
Procuring
Appropriated
Cost
Nomenclature
Appropriation
Or Requested
($000)
____________
_____________
____________
______
NONE
CFMO Name:
Phone Number:
PAGE NO. 284
PREVIOUS EDITIONS MAY BE USED INTERNALLY
UNTIL EXHAUSTED
DD
FORM
1 DEC 76 1391C