DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
FISCAL YEAR (FY) 2010
BUDGET ESTIMATES
JUSTIFICATION OF ESTIMATES
MAY 2009
RESEARCH, DEVELOPMENT, TEST &
EVALUATION, NAVY
BUDGET ACTIVITY 6
PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
Department of Defense Appropriations Act, 2010
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy
For expenses necessary for basic and applied scientific research, development, test
and evaluation, including maintenance, rehabilitation, lease, and operation of facilities
and equipment, $19,378,112,000, to remain available for obligation until September
30, 2011.
PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
UNCLASSIFIED
Department of the Navy
FY 2010/2011 President's Budget
Exhibit R-1 FY 2010 Base and Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) Request
Summary
(Dollars in Thousands)
Summary Recap of Budget Activities
---------------------------------RDT&E Management Support
FY 2008
Base&OCO
Actuals
-------------
FY 2009
Base&OCO
SupReq 4/9/09
-------------
FY 2010
Base
-------------
05 MAY 2009
FY 2010
OCO
-------------
FY 2010
Total
-------------
1,209,249
970,398
982,509
982,509
1,209,249
970,398
982,509
982,509
1,498
1,993
2,464
2,464
1,200,224
963,271
975,848
975,848
Training Medical and Other
4,932
5,134
4,197
4,197
Administration and Associated Activities
2,595
970,398
982,509
982,509
Total Research, Development, Test & Eval, Navy
Summary Recap of FYDP Programs
-----------------------------Intelligence and Communications
Research and Development
Classified Programs
Total Research, Development, Test & Eval, Navy
1,209,249
Exhibit R-1Q: FY 2010 Base and Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) Request, as of May 5, 2009 at 14:15:28
PAGE N-1
UNCLASSIFIED
* Reflects $30.510 million of a proposed $2.9 billion cancellation from the Department’s base budget (the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations, Act 2009, (Public Law 110-329), for fuel savings to
offset a portion of the additional Emergency Requests in FY 2009 Overseas Contingency Operations Supplemental Request (Acceleration/Grow the Force, Family Support, and National Capital Region Acceleration). Also reflects
a $5.0 million cancellation for certain classified programs that are now excess to requirements.
UNCLASSIFIED
Department of the Navy
FY 2010/2011 President's Budget Exhibit R-1 FY 2010 Base and Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) Request
Line
No
--
Program
Element
Number
------
Item
----
Act
---
FY 2008
Base&OCO
Actuals
-------------
FY 2009
Base&OCO
SupReq 4/9/09
-------------
FY 2010
Base
-------------
FY 2010
OCO
-------------
FY 2010
Total
-------------
S
E
C
-
137
0604256N
Threat Simulator Development
06
23,526
24,891
25,534
25,534
U
138
0604258N
Target Systems Development
06
31,545
80,119
79,603
79,603
U
139
0604759N
Major T&E Investment
06
41,328
52,050
44,844
44,844
U
140
0605152N
Studies and Analysis Support Navy
06
15,782
8,062
11,422
11,422
U
141
0605154N
Center for Naval Analyses
06
47,368
47,500
49,821
49,821
U
142
0605502N
Small Business Innovative Research
06
326,650
399
143
0605804N
Technical Information Services
06
20,944
15,571
735
735
U
144
0605853N
Management, Technical
International Support
06
46,865
51,264
60,590
60,590
U
145
0605856N
Strategic Technical Support
06
3,359
3,586
3,633
3,633
U
146
0605861N
RDT&E Science and Technology
Management
06
68,212
69,724
70,942
70,942
U
147
0605862N
RDT&E Instrumentation
Modernization
06
1,382
148
0605863N
RDT&E Ship and Aircraft Support
06
178,653
194,489
193,353
193,353
U
149
0605864N
Test and Evaluation Support
06
334,124
345,317
380,733
380,733
U
150
0605865N
Operational Test and Evaluation
Capability
06
12,092
12,162
12,010
12,010
U
151
0605866N
Navy Space and Electronic Warfare
(SEW) Support
06
2,366
2,700
2,703
2,703
U
152
0605867N
SEW Surveillance/Reconnaissance
Support
06
23,915
25,270
20,921
20,921
U
153
0605873M
Marine Corps Program Wide Support
06
22,113
30,167
19,004
19,004
U
154
0305885N
Tactical Cryptologic Activities
06
1,498
1,993
2,464
2,464
U
&
U
U
Exhibit R-1Q: FY 2010 Base and Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) Request, as of May 5, 2009 at 14:15:28
PAGE N-2
UNCLASSIFIED
* Reflects $30.510 million of a proposed $2.9 billion cancellation from the Department’s base budget (the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations, Act 2009, (Public Law 110-329), for fuel savings to
offset a portion of the additional Emergency Requests in FY 2009 Overseas Contingency Operations Supplemental Request (Acceleration/Grow the Force, Family Support, and National Capital Region Acceleration). Also reflects
a $5.0 million cancellation for certain classified programs that are now excess to requirements.
UNCLASSIFIED
Department of the Navy
FY 2010/2011 President's Budget
Exhibit R-1 FY 2010 Base and Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) Request
(Dollars in Thousands)
APPROPRIATION: 1319N Research, Development, Test & Eval, Navy
Line
No
--
Program
Element
Number
------
Item
----
Act
---
Date: 05 MAY 2009
FY 2008
Base&OCO
Actuals
-------------
155
0804758N
Service Support to JFCOM, JNTC
06
4,932
156
0909999N
Financing for Cancelled Account
Adjustments
06
2,595
RDT&E Management Support
Total Research, Development, Test & Eval, Navy
FY 2009
Base&OCO
SupReq 4/9/09
-------------
FY 2010
Base
-------------
5,134
FY 2010
OCO
-------------
4,197
FY 2010
Total
------------4,197
S
E
C
U
U
---------1,209,249
---------970,398
---------982,509
----------
---------982,509
---------1,209,249
---------970,398
---------982,509
----------
---------982,509
Exhibit R-1Q: FY 2010 Base and Overseas Contingency Operations (OCO) Request, as of May 5, 2009 at 14:15:28
PAGE N-3
UNCLASSIFIED
* Reflects $30.510 million of a proposed $2.9 billion cancellation from the Department’s base budget (the Consolidated Security, Disaster Assistance, and Continuing Appropriations, Act 2009, (Public Law 110-329), for fuel savings to
offset a portion of the additional Emergency Requests in FY 2009 Overseas Contingency Operations Supplemental Request (Acceleration/Grow the Force, Family Support, and National Capital Region Acceleration). Also reflects
a $5.0 million cancellation for certain classified programs that are now excess to requirements.
PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
UNCLASSIFIED
Department of the Navy
FY 2010 President's Budget
(Dollars in Thousands)
FY 2009 Proposed Fuel Cancellations
APPROPRIATION: 1319N Research, Development, Test & Eval, Navy
Line
No
137
138
139
140
144
145
148
149
151
Program
Element
Number
Item
0604256N
Threat Simulator Development
0604258N
Target Systems Development
0604759N
Major T&E Investment
0605152N
Studies & Analysis Supt - Navy
0605853N
Management, Technical & Intl Supt
0605856N
Strategic Technical Support
0605863N
RDT&E Ship & Aircraft Support
0605864N
Test & Evaluation Support
0605866N
Navy Space & Electr Warfare Supt
Total Research, Development, Test & Eval, Navy
Act
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
06
(BA 06)
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2009
-177
-261
-525
-18
-51
-1
-455
-4427
-2
-5917
S
E
C
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
U
PAGE INTENTIONALLY BLANK
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
Project
Number &
Title
FY 2008
Actual
FY 2009
Estimate
FY 2010
Estimate
Total PE
23.526
24.714
25.534
0602 ELETRONICS W/F ENV SIMULATION (ECHO)
11.562
12.029
12.531
0672 EFFECTIVENESS OF NAVY ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSEMS (ENEWS)
11.964
12.685
13.003
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This is a continuing program that consolidates the
design, fabrication and integration of Naval Electronic Warfare (EW) threat simulators for increased
managerial emphasis and coordination. These simulator development efforts provide realistic Developmental and
Operational Test and Evaluation (DT&E/OT&E) environments to test Tri-service EW systems and defensive tactics.
These projects develop former Soviet and Free-World Anti-Air and Anti-Ship weapon system simulators in
accordance with the Services' requirements.
The 0602 Project, Electronic Warfare Environment Simulation (ECHO), directly supports the Test and Evaluation
resource requirements for all Naval Air EW development programs to include multi-spectral situational
awareness and countermeasures. Programs in development and future programs include: Advanced Anti-Radiation
Guided Missile (AARGM), ALR-67 (v) 2 and (v) 3, Integrated Defensive Electronic Countermeasures (IDECM) Suite
ALQ-214, AAR-47 (v) 2 and the AAR-47 (v) 3, AVR-2, Advanced 6" Expendable, Advanced Strategic Tactical
Expendable (ASTE), ALQ-144A, Joint and Allied Threat Awareness System (JATAS), Strike and Assault Directed
Infrared Countermeasures (DIRCM), Joint Strike Fighter, EA-18G, EA-6B Improved Capability Program (ICAP III),
LR700 and the Low Band Transmitter.
R1 Line Item 137
Page 1 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
The 0672 Project, Effectiveness of Navy EW Systems (ENEWS), is a Department of Navy (DON) unique project that
supports Test and Evaluation (T&E) of Ships EW efforts. ENEWS provides T&E for surface and subsurface
shipboard systems and tactics in digitally modeled battle scenarios at the component, fully integrated single
ship, multi-ship and full-up multi-platform battle group levels. ENEWS also provides a secure anechoic closed
loop T&E facility specifically designed to test shipboard systems at the stand alone subsystem or fully
integrated systems level. The last and largest portion of this project addresses the flyable Infrared and
Radio Frequency simulators flown on specially configured NP-3D aircraft to provide at-sea open air T&E for
systems and tactics. All ENEWS assets are developed, operated and maintained by the Naval Research
Laboratory, Washington, DC.
R1 Line Item 137
Page 2 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
President's Budget 2009
Congressional Program Reductions
Program Adjustments
Rate/Misc Adjustments
SBIR/STTR Transfer
President's Budget 2010
FY 2008
23.505
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.021
23.526
PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Technical: Not applicable.
Schedule: Not applicable.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
E. PERFORMANCE METRICS:
Performance metrics are discussed within each project (R2a).
R1 Line Item 137
Page 3 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2009
24.959
-0.068
0.000
-0.177
0.000
24.714
FY 2010
25.831
0.000
-0.376
0.079
0.000
25.534
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0602
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE: ELETRONICS W/F ENV SIMULATION (ECHO)
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
Project
FY 2008
FY 2009
Number
Actual
Estimate
& Title
0602 ELETRONICS W/F ENV SIMULATION (ECHO)
11.562
12.029
FY 2010
Estimate
12.531
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The objective of this project is development of
necessary simulation facilities and approaches to allow determination of the effectiveness of Electronic
Warfare (EW) in real world engagement situations and to support the introduction of modern, effective systems
into Naval Aviation. The heavy use of test resources by all Services demonstrates the importance of these
assets. The Navy has been very successful in executing all of its major programs, and to date has had no
major technical problems.
The Electronic Warfare Environment Simulation (ECHO) project is unique because it is the only program within
the Department of Defense (DoD) which develops and provides Naval anti-air warfare threat assets for Testing
and Evaluation (T&E), and is a critical part of the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) Test Resource
Master Plan. The OSD Master Plan employs many ECHO project resources for planning, analysis, testing, and
verification of airborne EW equipment.
This project directly supports the Test and Evaluation resource requirements for all Naval Air EW development
programs, to include multi-spectral situational awareness and countermeasures. Programs in development and
future programs include: Advanced Anti-Radiation Guided Missile (AARGM), ALR-67 (v) 2 and (v) 3, Integrated
Defensive Electronic Countermeasures (IDECM) Suite ALQ-214, AAR-47 (v) 2 and the AAR-47 (v) 3, AVR-2, Advanced
6" Expendable, Advanced Strategic Tactical Expendable (ASTE), ALQ-144A, Joint and Allied Threat Awareness
System (JATAS), Strike and Assault Directed Infrared Countermeasures (DIRCM), Joint Strike Fighter, EA-18G,
EA-6B Improved Capability Program (ICAP III), LR700 and the Low Band Transmitter (LBT).
This project provides for the development of an Integrated Air Defense T&E capability to be fielded at each of
the three sites comprising the Navy's Tri-Center complex: Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, China
Lake and Point Mugu in CA, and Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division, Patuxent River, MD.
R1 Line Item 137
Page 4 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0602
B.
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE: ELETRONICS W/F ENV SIMULATION (ECHO)
ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
ELECTRO-OPTICAL/INFRA-RED (EO/IR) THREAT CAPABILITIES
FY 2008
3.250
FY 2009
2.395
FY 2010
0.950
Provide the test community with the modern threat systems necessary for T&E of airborne EO/IR passive alert
systems and airborne EO/IR active response systems. Develop Many versus Many (MvM) Infrared Countermeasure
Assessment System (ICAS) which provides spectral, power, and temporal systems to test and evaluate Missile
Warning Systems (MWS) and measure the end-game effectiveness of Infrared (IR) expendables and Directed
Infrared Countermeasures (DIRCM) systems by simulating high speed IR missile engagements against airborne
targets. Combine the capability of the existing IR seeker vans to enable testing of up to 12 seekers
simultaneously to expedite data collection against tier 1 IR Surface to Air Missiles (SAMs). Develop the
Reactive Plume Simulator (RPS) by upgrading the IR Sensor Stimulator (IRSS) with the capability for IR plume
simulators to react to threat missile seeker guidance commands; to enable the plume stimulator to receive
immediate feedback from the instrumentation observing the countermeasure's effectiveness; and to relay that
“response” to the controlling software that generates the plume signature. Develop Advanced Imaging Infra-Red
(IIR) Seeker which integrates prelaunch tracking and simulated fly-out capability with missile plume
simulation system to provide open air test capability for airborne passive and active EO/IR systems.
Funding decreases from FY 2008 to FY 2009, and FY 2010 based on the priority of the test shortfall.
Funding for the EO/IR effort decreases due to the completion of the MvM portions of the ICAS and Reactive
Plume Simulator (RPS) in FY 2009. These systems will support testing for the Joint and Allied Threat
Awareness System (JATAS), Assault DIRCM and other Navy programs.
RADIO FREQUENCY (RF) THREAT CAPABILITIES
FY 2008
6.429
FY 2009
7.570
FY 2010
9.685
Provide the test community with the modern threat systems necessary for T&E of airborne RF alert, Situation
Awareness, targeting systems and airborne RF response systems. Upgrade the existing open air range threat
simulator to provide a new generation, high fidelity double digit threat I-34 (Advanced Threat Simulator).
R1 Line Item 137
Page 5 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0602
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE: ELETRONICS W/F ENV SIMULATION (ECHO)
Procure and integrate an advanced threat system through Foreign Materials Acquisition channels. Continue
intel updates to missile, radar, and gun simulations. Upgrade the I-32 open air simulator by replacing the
aging transmitter; provide the I-32 simulator at the Electronic Combat Range (ECR) with a second frequency for
multiple-missile launch, side lobe canceling, and improved Electronic Counter-Counter Measure (ECCM)
capabilities. Develop long range threat systems to simulate double digit Surface to Air Missiles, using
recent intelligence and available exploitation data gathered by the Missile and Space Intelligence Center
(MSIC). Develop multi-band RF threat simulators to stimulate airborne systems. Upgrade the J-32B Advanced
Threat System at ECR to replicate the newer variant of the threat system. Develop an Advanced Early Warning
and Acquisition (EW/ACQ) radar hybrid laboratory simulator that operates with the I-34 laboratory simulators.
Funding increases from FY 2008 to FY 2009 and FY 2010 based on the priority of the test shortfall. Funding
for the RF effort increases from FY 2008 to FY 2009 and FY 2010 due to the need to address double digit threat
systems (I-32 Transmitter, I-34, and J-32B), and to start development of another high priority long range
threat system, and an advanced EW/ACQ system. These systems are required to test the Joint Strike Fighter,
EA-18G, and other Navy platforms.
REQUIREMENTS AND VALIDATION
FY 2008
1.883
FY 2009
2.064
FY 2010
1.896
Validate and track intel updates of the threat systems necessary for the operation and continuous improvement
of Navy laboratories and ranges which provide engineering support, testing and analysis to the developers,
integrators, testers and users of systems and technologies that counter or penetrate air defenses. Provide
program management and systems engineering support for the development of simulators and the acquisition of
foreign material to accurately reflect current and future threat scenarios.
Funding increases from FY 2008 to FY 2009 are due to the fact that funds get aligned to different efforts
based on the priority of the test shortfall. Funding for the Requirements and Validation effort increases
from FY 2008 to FY 2009 due to the need to validate the open air range double digit threat system I-34 and
several newly integrated Threat Model and Analysis Program (TMAP) missile fly-out models. These systems are
required to test the Joint Strike Fighter, EA-18G, and other Navy platforms.
R1 Line Item 137
Page 6 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0602
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE: ELETRONICS W/F ENV SIMULATION (ECHO)
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NON-NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R1 Line Item 137
Page 7 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
DATE: May 2009
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0672
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE: EFFECTIVENESS OF NAVY ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSEMS (ENEWS)
Project
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
Number
Actual
Estimate
Estimate
& Title
0672 EFFECTIVENESS OF NAVY ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSEMS (ENEWS)
11.964
12.685
13.003
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The objective of the Effectiveness of Navy Electronic
Warfare (EW) Systems (ENEWS) Project is the development and application of necessary simulation assets to
determine the effectiveness of EW for navy ships in simulated real-world engagement situations. The project
primarily supports the introduction of modern, effective shipboard and offboard EW systems, and tactics for
the Surface Navy. The heavy use of ENEWS resources by Naval Sea Systems Command, Operational Test and
Evaluation (OT&E) Force, Special Operations, and other EW Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (T&E)
agencies speaks to the overall importance of this project. The project provides support for EW system design
Engineering Test (ET), Development Test (DT), Operational Test (OT), and the development of utilization
tactics. Its quick reaction capabilities have had great impact on crisis situations such as the Lebanon and
Libyan crises, Iran Harpoon threat, Persian Gulf crisis, and Operation Desert Shield/Storm. Simulation
Display is another ENEWS modeling tool that was developed to support T&E. The display has been adopted by
most Department of Defense (DoD) T&E and training ranges to provide visualization of T&E and training
scenarios. The primary threat to surface ships is Anti-Ship Capable Missile systems. The ENEWS Project is
unique in that it is the only project within DoD dedicated to developing and providing realistic Anti-Ship
Capable Missile assets to test and evaluate the effectiveness of shipboard EW systems and tactics against
these type threats. The ENEWS Project is a critical part of the Office of the Secretary of Defense Test
Resource Master Plan. This plan employs many of the ENEWS assets for planning, analysis, testing, and
verification of shipboard and offboard EW systems techniques and tactics. As part of its normal activities,
ENEWS provides Development Test and Evaluation (DT&E), OT&E, and Follow-on Operational Test and Evaluation
(FOT&E) support to the surface Navy for all ship classes. DT, OT and FOT&E support includes AN/SLQ-32 Surface
Electronic Warfare Improvement Program (SEWIP), R17.OX NULKA, Rapid Anti-ship Integrated Defense System, all
MK245 Giant tests, advanced InfraRed (IR) decoys, decoy placement, ship IR signature and radar cross section
measurement of DDG-51, LPD-17, DD-21 and PC class ships, High Power Microwave program, and other ship selfdefense initiatives, including T&E of Future Naval Capability process. In addition, ENEWS assets are
R1 Line Item 137
Page 8 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0672
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE: EFFECTIVENESS OF NAVY ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSEMS (ENEWS)
regularly employed to test the effectiveness of North Atlantic Treaty Organization ships' EW systems in joint
allied exercises. ENEWS assets also support Joint EW exercises that are conducted with Rim of the Pacific
(RIMPAC) nations.
B.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
CLASSIFIED PROGRAM
FY 2008
7.592
FY 2009
7.774
FY 2010
8.200
FY 2008
1.586
FY 2009
1.822
FY 2010
1.775
Details about this program are classified.
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Details are of a higher classification.
FY 2009 Plans:
- Details are of a higher classification.
FY 2010 Plans:
- Details are of a higher classification.
HARDWARE SIMULATION SYSTEMS
Maintain and perform Hardware and Software Upgrades to the inventory of ENEWS flyable and shore based AntiShip Capable Missile (ASCM) Electro-Optic/Infrared, Visible and Radio Frequency (RF) Simulators. Perform
characterization of IR and RF simulators as part of periodic evaluation of simulation performance and collect
R1 Line Item 137
Page 9 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0672
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE: EFFECTIVENESS OF NAVY ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSEMS (ENEWS)
performance data for comparison with previously recorded data.
control panels.
Development and maintenance of all simulator
Two new simulators are planned to be introduced into the ENEWS inventory in FY 2010; one of these simulators
is being produced under contract which is reflected in the increase in the FY 2009 budget.
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Continued
- Continued
- Completed
- Completed
- Initiated
- Initiated
- Initiated
- Initiated
Electronics
- Initiated
annual maintenance on ENEWS simulators to support flight/shore based tests.
annual maintenance on ENEWS simulators to support flight/shore based tests.
hardware intelligence upgrades to FOXTROT 3 and MIKE 4 Standard Instrumentation Pods (SIPs).
software intelligence upgrades to FOXTROT 3 and MIKE 4 (SIPs).
intelligence upgrades to FOXTROT 2 and VICTOR 2 SIPs.
software intelligence upgrades to FOXTROT 2 and VICTOR 2 SIPs.
and completed characterization of KILO, QUEBEC AND TANGO.
and completed transition of the ROMEO simulator into the Naval Research Laboratory Learjet
Pod (NRL LEP).
QUEBEC control panel.
FY 2009 Plans:
-
Continue
Complete
Complete
Complete
Initiate
Initiate
Initiate
all efforts of FY 2008, less those noted as completed above.
intelligence upgrades to FOXTROT 2 and VICTOR 2 SIPs.
software intelligence upgrades to FOXTROT 2 and VICTOR 2 SIPs.
QUEBEC control panel.
and complete characterization of INDIA III and PAPA.
and complete transition of the INDIA III into the NRL LEP.
and complete VICTOR 1 SIP control panel.
FY 2010 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY 2009, less those noted as completed above.
- Initiate intelligence upgrades to MEIR 2-2, MEIR 3, SUMMIT simulators and the MIKE 2 & 3, and VICTOR 1 SIPs.
R1 Line Item 137
Page 10 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0672
-
Initiate
Initiate
Initiate
Initiate
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE: EFFECTIVENESS OF NAVY ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSEMS (ENEWS)
software intelligence upgrades to VICTOR 1 SIP and SUMMIT simulators.
and complete characterization of the TANGO simulator modified for the NRL LEP.
transition of the TANGO simulator into the NRL LEP
and complete the INDIA I control panel.
SIMULATION VALIDATION AND REQUIREMENTS
FY 2008
0.849
FY 2009
1.047
FY 2010
0.946
Provides for the validation of hardware simulators and digital models. Develops reports that contain detailed
descriptions and parametric data of the threat simulators or digital models and compares the simulator’s
parametric data to the actual threats parametric data. Provide technical management functions in support of
the ENEWS project; engineering and technical support requirements for the overall efforts of ASCM simulator
and digital model development to meet DT/OT testing requirements, development of detailed test resource
requirements and provides an interface between N-912, N-433, Office of Naval Research and other ENEWS
oversight activities.
The increase between FY 2008 and FY 2009 is due to the completion and presentation to the Simulator Validation
Working Group (SVWG) of two hardware validation reports in FY 2009.
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Continued
- Continued
- Completed
- Initiated
- Initiated
- Initiated
analysis.
TANGO and NOVEMBER Vb hardware validation reports.
management of the SVWG.
NOVEMBER Va validation report and submit report to the SVWG.
INDIA I, PAPA and KILO hardware validation reports.
and completed update of FY 2008 Program Management Plan.
and completed FY 2008 quarterly reports, earned value management analysis, progress tracking and
FY 2009 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY 2008, less those noted as completed above.
R1 Line Item 137
Page 11 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0672
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE: EFFECTIVENESS OF NAVY ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSEMS (ENEWS)
- Complete NOVEMBER Vb and TANGO hardware validation reports and submit to the SVWG.
- Initiate and complete update of FY 2009 Program Management Plan.
- Initiate and complete FY 2009 quarterly reports, earned value management analysis, progress tracking and
analysis.
FY 2010 Plans:
- Continue
- Initiate
- Initiate
- Initiate
analysis.
all efforts of FY 2009, less those noted as completed above.
MEIR 3 hardware validation report.
and complete update of FY 2010 Program Management Plan.
and complete FY 2010 quarterly reports, earned value management analysis, progress tracking and
SUPPORT AND COMPUTERS SIMULATION SYSTEMS
FY 2008
1.937
FY 2009
2.042
FY 2010
2.082
Perform maintenance and intelligence upgrades to EO/IR, Digital, and RF Laboratory Simulation testing
facilities and flight support equipment based on existing and emerging complex threat systems. Development of
test and evaluation (T&E) scenarios and environmental modeling to support electronic support (ES) and
electronic attack (EA) testing; modify ASCM Digital Models based on the latest intelligence data obtained from
threat databases.
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Continued maintenance and upgrades to shore based test facilities and mobile test vans as required to
conduct tests in support of SEWIP, NULKA and multi function Electronic Warfare (EW) programs.
- Continued transitioning NRL Codes 5750 and 5770's environmental, threat and platform simulations to the
subversion software configuration management program. Upgraded subversion software library as new releases
became available.
- Continued new digital models of Anti-ship Cruise Missile (ASCM) threats as they became available.
- Continued upgrades and maintenance of flight support systems as necessary to support the IR/RF ENEWS
simulators.
R1 Line Item 137
Page 12 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0604256N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0672
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: THREAT SIMULATOR DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT TITLE: EFFECTIVENESS OF NAVY ELECTRONIC WARFARE SYSEMS (ENEWS)
- Continued improvements and intelligence upgrades to ALPHA I, INDIA I, II, III, LIMA, NOVEMBER III, QUEBEC,
TANGO, and TANGO II. In all, a total of 9 digital models.
- Continued upgrade to cruise missile simulation suite to improve capability to model advanced threats by
adding graphical user interface (GUI).
FY 2009 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY 2008.
- Complete upgrade to cruise missile simulation suite to improve capability to model advanced threats by
adding GUI.
FY 2010 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY 2009, less those noted as completed above.
- Initiate improvements and intelligence upgrades to the COHERENT and FASM digital models.
- Initiate intelligence updates and simulation productization for the Long Range High Altitude (LRHA) digital
model.
C.
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NON-NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R1 Line Item 137
Page 13 of 13
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Total PE Cost
0609 AERIAL TARGET SYSTEMS DEV
0610 WPN SYS T&E TRG DEV/PRC
0612 SURFACE TARGETS DEVELOPMENT
DATE:
May 2009
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
0604258N, TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
FY 2008
31.545
12.909
17.429
1.207
FY 2009
79.858
50.671
26.880
2.307
FY 2010
79.603
55.621
22.765
1.217
(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
This program element funds the development and procurement of aerial targets, surface targets, control systems, and associated target
augmentation & auxiliary systems needed to represent real world threat systems. These capabilities are key enablers to the successful execution
of the developmental & operational test and evaluation of naval combat weapons systems and satisfy advanced fleet training requirements.
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY
Funding:
Previous President's Budget
Current BES Budget
Total Adjustments
FY 2008
31.684
31.545
-0.139
Summary of Adjustments
Congressional Rescissions
Congressional Adjustments
SBIR/STTR/FTT Assessments
Program Adjustments
Rate/Misc Adjustments
FY 2009
80.337
79.858
-0.479
FY 2010
80.758
79.603
-1.155
-0.261
-0.139
Subtotal
-0.139
-0.218
-0.479
-1.148
-0.007
-1.155
Schedule:N/A
Technical:N/A
UNCLASSIFIED
R-1 SHOPPING LIST- Item No 138
Page 1 of 8
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E,N / BA-6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0604258N, TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
FY 2008
12.909
COST ($ in Millions)
0609 AERIAL TARGET SYSTEMS DEV
RDT&E Articles Qty
n/a
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
FY 2009
50.671
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0609, AERIAL TARGET SYSTEMS DEV
FY 2010
55.621
Aerial target systems, target control, and associated target augmentation and auxiliary systems are developed to support test & evaluation and
advanced fleet training for Joint Strike and Littoral Warfare Systems required to defend fleet surface and air units in a hostile environment.
This project includes:
- Subsonic Targets. Subsonic Aerial Target (SSAT) development. The SSAT primarily represents subsonic anti-ship cruise missile threats in
direct support of the test & evaluation of major combat weapons systems programs and fleet training.
- Supersonic Targets. Supersonic Sea Skimming Target (SSST), Multi-Stage Supersonic Target (MSST) and supersonic high-diver capability
development. The family of supersonic target capabilities represent supersonic anti-ship cruise missile threats in direct support of
developmental
& operational test and evaluation of major combat weapons systems programs in development.
- Target Control (TC) and Target Augmentation & Auxiliary Systems (TA/AS) development. TC provides command and control of targets to enable
the execution of threat representative mission profiles. TA/AS enables each target to be uniquely configured for specific mission profiles.
TA/AS
configured targets are used for radar acquisition test, electronic countermeasures (jamming) evaluation, infrared measurement/test, radar cross
section evaluation, decoy effectiveness, maneuver analysis, electronic warfare, warhead effectiveness and evaluation of fleet tactics. TA/AS
scoring capabilities include both surface and airborne scalar and vector scoring systems.
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS / PLANNED PROGRAM:
Supersonic Aerial Targets
Accomplishments / Effort / Sub-total Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
FY 2008
5.695
FY 2009
32.723
FY 2010
44.417
SUPERSONIC AERIAL TARGETS
Continue GQM-163A SSST upgrades/evolutionary development to keep pace with evolving threat characteristics.
Efforts include: continue to establish operational capability at Pacific Missile Range Facility; integrate ECM capability in the GQM-163A;
research and develop performance envelope enhancements to satisfy emerging requirements to include improved flight termination performance; develop
Front End Section payload enhancements and continue development of GQM-163A high-diver capability.
Continue efforts to meet Threat D Target CDD requirements during the MSST Systems Development and Demonstration
(SDD) phase.
Subsonic Aerial Targets
Accomplishments / Effort / Sub-total Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
FY 2008
1.300
FY 2009
11.668
FY 2010
4.816
SUBSONIC AERIAL TARGETS
Continue Subsonic Aerial Target development and upgrades to keep pace with evolving threat requirements. Efforts include: Continue
product improvements to the existing SSAT to achieve performance and payload requirements. Continue evaluation of alternate subsonic subscale
aerial targets to meet evolving subsonic threat representation requirements. Prepare and conduct a competitive contract award and Milestone B
for a target to be developed to achieve approved SSAT requirements. Enter SDD phase for the follow-on SSAT.
UNCLASSIFIED
R-1 SHOPPING LIST- Item No 138
Page 2 of 8
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E,N / BA-6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0604258N, TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0609, AERIAL TARGET SYSTEMS DEV
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS / PLANNED PROGRAM (CONTINUED):
TC/TAAS
Accomplishments / Effort / Sub-tota
RDT&E Articles Qty
FY 2008
5.914
FY 2009
6.280
FY 2010
6.388
TC/TAAS
Continue Target Control (TC) and TA/AS to development and support to T&E and fleet training activities. TC includes the improved command and control
systems capable of controlling multiple targets simultaneously while delivering adequate fidelity of T&E telemetry data.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
228000 Aerial Target System
612020 Spares and Repair Parts
FY 2008
66.856
1.153
FY 2009
78.581
0.981
FY 2010
47.003
0.823
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable
UNCLASSIFIED
R-1 SHOPPING LIST- Item No 138
Page 3 of 8
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E,N / BA-6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0604258N, TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0610, WPN SYS T&E TRG DEV/PRC
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
COST ($ in Millions)
17.429
26.880
22.765
0610 WPN SYS T&E TRG DEV/PRC
RDT&E Articles Qty n/a
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
This project provides for the development and procurement of aerial targets and associated systems used exclusively for test and evaluation of
naval weapons systems which closely represent current and projected threats to fleet units in the Joint Strike and the Littoral Warfare
environments. These representations must include characteristics related to size, performance envelope, and electromagnetic and infrared
signatures. As threats change, changes must be made to keep the targets threat representative in response to changes in the test requirements of
the developers of naval weapons systems.
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS / PLANNED PROGRAM:
Air Superiority Target
Accomplishments / Effort / Sub-total Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
FY 2008
1.500
FY 2009
8.242
FY 2010
6.500
AIR SUPERIORITY TARGET
The Air Superiority Target (AST) is being developed as the follow-on to the current Full Scale Aerial Target (FAST). The AST will be a
supersonic, high altitude, remote-controlled aerial target. This target will have full command and control capability through normal flight
maneuvers. Planned efforts continue support for the follow-on FSAT development.
QF-4 Full Scale Aerial Target
Accomplishments / Effort / Sub-total Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
FY 2008
14.809
FY 2009
17.593
FY 2010
15.225
QF-4 FULL SCALE AERIAL TARGET
The FSAT is a supersonic, high altitude, remote-controlled aerial target. This target has full command and control capability
through normal flight maneuvers. Continued program, engineering and logistics support for the FSAT, including Aviation Depot Level Repairables
(AVDLR), procurement of kit material and conversion of F-4 aircraft into FSAT targets. QF-4 procurements support aircraft and weapons systems
including JSF, AIM-9X, AMRAAM and SM-6.
TC/ TAAS & Scoring Systems
Accomplishments / Effort / Sub-total Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
FY 2008
1.120
FY 2009
1.045
FY 2010
1.040
TC/TAAS & SCORING SYSTEMS
Continue to support Target Control (TC) and Target Auxiliary & Augmentation Systems (TA/AS) capable of supporting T&E activities. TC involves the
improved command and control systems capable of controlling multiple targets simultaneously while delivering adequate fidelity of T&E telemetry
data. Augmentation and Auxiliary systems must be capable of augmenting targets in support of radar acquisition test, electronic countermeasures
(jamming) evaluation, infrared measurement/test, radar cross section evaluation, decoy effectiveness, maneuver analysis, electronic warfare,
warhead effectiveness and evaluation of fleet tactics, readiness and training. Scoring systems include both surface and airborne scalar and
vector scoring
UNCLASSIFIED
R-1 SHOPPING LIST- Item No 138
Page 4 of 8
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E,N / BA-6
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
228000 Aerial Target System
612020 Spares and Repair Parts
(WPN B.A. 6)
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0604258N, TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
FY 2008
66.856
1.153
FY 2009
78.581
0.981
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0610, WPN SYS T&E TRG DEV/PRC
FY 2010
47.003
0.823
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable
UNCLASSIFIED
R-1 SHOPPING LIST- Item No 138
Page 5 of 8
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
COST (In Millions)
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0604258N/TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
FY 2008
Project Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
FY 2009
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0612/SURFACE TARGETS DEV
FY 2010
1.207
2.307
1.217
0
0
0
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
This project develops seaborne targets systems and their related target augmentation systems in support of air-to-surface and surface-to-surface weapons test and evaluation
and fleet training.
UNCLASSIFIED
R-1 SHOPPING LIST- Item No 138
Page 6 of 8
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
RDTEN/BA 6
0604258N/TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0612/SURFACE TARGETS DEV
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
FY 2008
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity
FY 2009
FY 2010
1.207
2.307
1.217
0
0
0
- Continued requirements Study Analysis of target requirements in response to weapons systems development and upgrades.
- Continued testing of real-time surface target scoring systems, including shift to seaborne platform based vector scorer.
- Continued command and control upgrade development including LEO uplink/downlink.
- Continued Weapons System/Emitter, Target Augmentation System(TAS) upgrade.
- Continued Target/Threat Characterization and Validation.
- Complete technical effort for 40M MST T&E platform procurement.
- Refine performance spec based on prototype FACT results prior to follow-on FY08 procurement.
- Finalize reports and prepare procurement recommendations to sponsors.
- Conduct testing of improved EO/IR augmentation on powered platforms.
- Adapt augmentation for use on tow platforms to enhance powered vessel survivability.
- Development of performance platforms for advanced sea-state testing.
UNCLASSIFIED
R-1 SHOPPING LIST- Item No 138
Page 7 of 8
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
0
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
DATE
May 2009
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0604258N/TARGET SYSTEMS DEVELOPMENT
COST (In Millions)
FY 2008
Project Cost
FY 2009
1.207
2.307
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0612/SURFACE TARGETS DEV
FY 2010
1.217
RDT&E Articles Qty
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
OPN Line 5455 ASW Rang SE
FY2008
FY2009
FY2010
8.861
17.148
7.256
D. ACQUISTION STRATEGY:
Not applicable
UNCLASSIFIED
R-1 SHOPPING LIST- Item No 138
Page 8 of 8
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY /
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT
BA-6
FY 2009
FY 2010
Total PE Cost
41.328
51.525
44.844
2195 T&E INVESTMENT
37.375
41.751
44.844
3.953
9.774
9999 CONGRESSIONAL ADDS
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project improves visibility and commonality of Test and Evaluation (T&E) resources across the Service for Major T&E investment
funding. These funds correct major deficiencies, improve T&E capabilities, and increase T&E support effectiveness. The T&E Investment project provides improved test capabilities at the following test facilities:
the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Detachment Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center (NAVUNSEAWARCEN DET AUTEC), Andros Island, Bahamas; the Nanoose and Dabob ranges of the Naval
Undersea Warfare Center Division Keyport (NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV Keyport), Keyport, WA; the Sea Range, Land Range, Electronic Combat Range, Targets, Ordnance T&E Facility, Test Wing Pacific, and
the Air Vehicle Modification and Instrumentation facility located at the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division (NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV), Point Mugu, CA and China Lake, CA; and the Atlantic Test
Range, Air Combat Environment T&E Facility, Electromagnetic Environmental Effects, Test Wing Atlantic, Targets, and the Propulsion Systems Evaluation Facility (PSEF) located at the Naval Air Warfare Center
Aircraft Division (NAVAIRWARCENACDIV), Patuxent River, MD and the test capabilities located at the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kauai, HI.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.
UNCLASSIFIED
139
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
Page 1 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY /
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
BA-6
0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
Funding:
President's Budget 2009:
President's Budget 2010:
Total Adjustments
FY08
FY09
FY10
40.885
41.328
0.443
42.391
51.525
9.134
46.239
44.844
-1.395
Summary of Adjustments
Congressional Rescissions
Congressional Adjustments
SBIR/STTR/FTT Assessments
Program Adjustments
Rate/Misc Adjustments
Subtotal
9.275
0.443
0.443
-0.141
9.134
-1.300
-0.095
-1.395
Schedule:
Not Applicable
Technical:
Not Applicable
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.
UNCLASSIFIED
Page 2 of 8
139
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT
FY 2008
37.375
FY 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
2195 T&E INVESTMENT
FY 2010
41.751
44.844
Not Applicable.
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project improves visibility and commonality of Test and Evaluation (T&E) resources across the Service for Major T&E
investment funding. These funds correct major deficiencies, improve T&E capabilities, and increase T&E support effectiveness. The T&E Investment project provides improved test capabilities
at the following test facilities: the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Detachment Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center (NAVUNSEAWARCEN DET AUTEC), Andros Island, Bahamas; the
Nanoose and Dabob ranges of the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Keyport (NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV Keyport), Keyport, WA; the Sea Range, Land Range, Electronic Combat Range,
Targets, Ordnance T&E Facility, Test Wing Pacific, and the Air Vehicle Modification and Instrumentation facility located at the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division
(NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV), Point Mugu, CA and China Lake, CA; and the Atlantic Test Range, Air Combat Environment T&E Facility, Electromagnetic Environmental Effects, Test Wing
Atlantic, Targets, and the Propulsion Systems Evaluation Facility (PSEF) located at the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAVAIRWARCENACDIV), Patuxent River, MD and the test
capabilities located at the Pacific Missile Range Facility, Kauai, HI.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.
UNCLASSIFIED
139
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 3 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT
2195 T&E INVESTMENT
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Undersea Range Investments
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity Not Applicable.
FY 08
9.019
FY 09
9.883
FY 10
9.989
Undersea Range Investments - This effort funds the modernization, upgrades, and new test capabilities required at the Navy's Major Range Test Facility Base (MRTFB) undersea ranges
Naval Undersea Warfare Center Detachment Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center (NAVUNSEAWARCEN DET AUTEC), Andros Island, Bahamas; the Nanoose and Dabob ranges
of the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Division Keyport (NAVUNSEAWARCENDIV Keyport), Keyport, WA.
AUTEC - The modernization of the deep water hydrophone acoustic signal processors; the modernization of communication links from AUTEC's main site to its downrange sites two, three
and four; the modernization and upgrade of voice and data communications links to submarines on the range; the development of new range post-processing software and modernized
hardware, the refurbishment and service life extension of the range vessel, upgrade the aircraft sonobuoy simulation and stimulation capability, upgrade and enhance the electronic warfare
(EW) simulator capability.
Nanoose and Dabob - The procurement and integration of additional hydrophone arrays; the addition of broadband capable bottom mounted targets to the Nanoose and Dabob ranges; the
modernization of acoustic acquisition and processing systems, the overhaul of range craft, the upgrade of the optical tracking and surveillance system.
Naval Surface Warfare Center Port Hueneme (NSWC PHD) - The dry-dock and refurbishment of the self defense test ship.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 139
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 4 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT
2195 T&E INVESTMENT
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Open Air Range Investments
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity Not Applicable.
FY 08
24.018
FY 09
25.804
FY 10
20.782
Open Air Range Investments - This effort funds the modernization and upgrades of existing capabilities and the development of new test capabilities required at the MRTFB open air ranges :
Sea Range - The modernization of the fifth tracking radar; the development of target launch, airborne telemetry, optics, flight termination capabilities for the range support aircraft; the
upgrade of video capabilities; the modernization of the mobile radio communications system; the modernization of range timing and sensor interface; the addition of enhanced flight
termination system; the modernization of the telemetry antenna systems; the upgrade of telemetry instrumentation recorders; the modernization of Global Positional System (GPS) tracking
systems; the development of a Range Capabilities Master Plan (RCMP); the replacement of fiber terminal equipment to upgrade communications links from San Nicolas Island (SNI) to the
mainland; the procurement of a doppler radar system; the modernization of sea surface surveillance radars; the modernize crypto equipment: and the upgrade SNI telemetry equipment to
allow remote control.
Land Range - The upgrade of video capabilities; the modernization of the mobile radio communications system; the modernization of range timing and sensor interface; the addition of
enhanced flight termination system; the modernization of the telemetry antenna systems; the upgrade of telemetry instrumentation recorders; the modernization of Global Positional System
(GPS) tracking systems; the development of a Range Capabilities Master Plan (RCMP); the development of an Operational Range Clearance Plan (ORCP); the clean up of expended
depleted uranium, and the modernization of the Kineto Tracking Mounts (KTM).
Electronic Combat Range -The upgrade of video capabilities; the modernization of the mobile radio communications system; the modernization of range timing and threat system interface;
the modernization of two Time Space Position Information (TSPI) tracking radars; the replacement and upgrade of telemetry instrumentation recorders; the modernization of Global Positiona
System (GPS) tracking systems; the development of a Range Capabilities Master Plan (RCMP); the modernization of the communication and fiber infrastructure; the development of an
Operational Range Clearance Plan (ORCP); the clean up of expended depleted uranium; and the modernize crypto equipment.
Air Vehicle Modification and Instrumentation - The procurement of aircraft machining and prototyping equipment
Atlantic Test Range - The upgrade of the Infra-Red signature measurement system; the replacement and upgrade of telemetry instrumentation recorders; the modernization of Globa
Positional System (GPS) tracking systems; the development of a Range Capabilities Master Plan (RCMP); the modernization of the Multiple Target Instrumented Radar (MIR); and the
replacement of communication and data fiber between locations around the bay.
Pacific Missile Range Facility - The modernization of optical and radar tracking equipment, telemetry systems and the Mobile Aerial Target Support System (MATSS).
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 139
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 5 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT
2195 T&E INVESTMENT
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Test Facilities Investments
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity Not Applicable.
FY 08
4.338
FY 09
6.064
FY 10
14.073
Test Facilities Investments - This effort funds the modernization and upgrades of existing capabilities and the development of new test capabilities required at the MRTFB test facilities (Air
Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility (ACETEF), Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3), Propulsional Systems Evaluation Facility (PSEF), Ordnance T&E Facility).
ACETEF - The modernization of manned flight simulator computer systems and software; the development of a simulation environment visualization and debriefing system and software; the
development of High Power Radio Frequency (RF) Carts; the acquisition of a rotating pedestal to turn test articles; upgrade aircraft and test instrumentation capability; develop a Joint
Precision Approach and Landing System (JPALS) test capability; and develop a common data link test capability.
E3 - The modernization of Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) laboratory test equipment; and the modernization of Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) laboratory test equipment.
PSEF - The upgrade of the Helicopter Transmission Test Facility (HTTF) to support greater horsepower/torque and provide quicker setup time; and modernize and enhance the gas turbine
engine rotor spin facility.
Ordnance T&E Facility - The modernization of the Warhead Insensitive Munitions, and Safety Test site; and the replacement of the Non-Destructive Test and Evaluation facility large x-ray
machine.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 139
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 6 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT
2195 T&E INVESTMENT
BA-6
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not Applicable.
Line Item No. & Name
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not Applicable.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.
UNCLASSIFIED
139
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 7 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N / BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0604759N MAJOR T&E INVESTMENT
FY 08
Project Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
FY 09
3.953
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
9999 CONGRESSIONAL ADDS
FY 10
9.774
Not Applicable.
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: Congressional Adds.
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program:
FY 08
3.953
9A61 NETWORK EXPANSION & INTEGRATION OF NAVY/NASA RDT&E RANGES AND FACILITIES
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity
Not Applicable.
FY 09
4.787
FY 10
This is a continuing project that designs and develops (including environmental permits) fiber optic replacement of some of the existing microwave links between NASA instrumentation and
the Atlantic Test Range.
FY 08
9E03 AIR COMBAT ENVIRONMENT TEST AND EVALUATION FACILITY UPGRADE
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity
Not Applicable.
FY 09
2.992
FY 10
Funds provided for the upgrade of Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility. Upgrade WKS2000 workstation at ACETEF to PC-based Linux OS and port existing software to
current industry standards. Integrate waveform visualization components and audio components in to EWEnv Graphical User Interface (GUI); develop a preliminary translation capability
from EWIR to the EWEnv database format; install EWEnv in the Man Flight Simulator (MFS) lab and integrate with the F-18 simulator. Develop and integrate into MFS F-18 E/F simulation
High Level Architecture (HLA) compatible ALR-67(v3) model; APG-73 and APG-79 Active Electronically Scanned Array (AESA) radar model with air-to-air (A/A) and air-to-ground (A/G)
modes; ASQ-228(v2) Advanced Tactical Forward Looking Infra-Red (ATFLIR) capability with tracking hardware, avionics integration and atmospherics model.
FY 08
9E04 IMPROVED INTEROPERABILITY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT TO SUPPORT NAVAIR AND GWOT
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity
Not Applicable.
FY 09
1.995
FY 10
Funds provided to upgrade for the Ship Self Defense System (SSDS) and Cooperative Engagement Capability (CEC) Sensor Network at the Surface/Aviation Interoperability Laboratory
(SAIL).
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.
UNCLASSIFIED
139
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 8 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY /
COST ($ in Millions)
Total PE Cost
0133 NATIONAL ACAD SCI/STUD BOARD
2092 NAVAL WARFARE STUDIES
2097 MANPOWER PERSONNEL & TRAINING
FY 2008
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
0605152N, STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT - NAVY
BA-6
FY 2009
FY 2010
15.782
8.044
11.422
1.642
1.631
1.704
13.799
6.123
8.938
0.341
0.290
0.780
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program provides analytical support to the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations as a basis for major policy,
planning and acquisition program execution decisions. It supports research and development strategy development and planning. It supports studies in the areas of manpower, personnel, training, and
aviation. It also develops analytical tools for evaluating effectiveness of U.S. weapons against potential foreign threat ships and submarines.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 140
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
Page 1 of 10
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY /
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
BA-6
0605152N, STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT - NAVY
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
Funding:
President's Budget 2009:
President's Budget 2010:
Total Adjustments
FY08
FY09
FY10
7.338
15.782
8.444
8.084
8.044
-0.040
8.681
11.422
2.741
Summary of Adjustments
Congressional Rescissions
Congressional Adjustments
SBIR/STTR/FTT Assessments
Program Adjustments
Rate/Misc Adjustments
Subtotal
-0.018
-0.053
8.508
-0.011
8.444
-0.022
-0.040
2.250
0.491
2.741
Schedule:
Not Applicable
Technical:
Not Applicable.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 140
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
Page 2 of 10
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0605152N / STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT, NAVY
FY 2008
1.642
FY 2009
1.631
0133 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES/NAVAL STUDIES BOARD
FY 2010
1.704
RDT&E Articles Qty
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
This project supports the core program for the Naval Studies Board. As agreed upon between the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) and the President of the National Academy of
Sciences and with appropriate attention to the influence of the domestic economy, national objectives, social imperatives and anticipated military requirements, the Naval Studies Board
will conduct and report upon surveys, investigations, and analyses in the field of scientific research and development applicable to the operation and function of the Navy. Reports
consist of a briefing to the Assistant Secretary of the Navy (Research Development and Acquisition) (ASN (RD&A)) and the CNO and staff, and written technical reports.
Performance Metrics:
Conduct and report upon surveys, investigations, and analyses in the field of scientific research and development applicable to the operations and function of the Navy in a timely
manner.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 140
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
(Exhibit R-2a, page 3 of 10)
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
MAY 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0605152N / STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT, NAVY
0133 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES/NAVAL STUDIES BOARD
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
FY 08
FY 09
1.642
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
FY 10
1.631
1.704
FY 2008 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• Continued research efforts and investigations in areas of interest to the Navy.
• Completed studies on Global War on Terrorism and Distributed Remote Sensing.
• Initiated a new study on Information Assurance selected by the CNO during FY08.
FY 2009 PLANS:
• Continue research efforts and investigations in areas of interest to the Navy.
• Complete studies initiated in FY08.
• Initiate two new studies to be selected by the CNO during FY09.
FY 2010 PLANS:
• Continue research efforts and investigations in areas of interest to the Navy.
• Complete studies initiated in FY09.
• Initiate new studies to be selected by the CNO during FY10.
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity
FY 02
0.200
1
FY 03
0.200
FY 04
0.100
FY 05
0.400
1
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 140
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2 RDTEN Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, Page 4 of 10)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0605152N / STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT, NAVY
0133 NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES/NAVAL STUDIES BOARD
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Navy Related RDT&E: Not applicable.
Non-Navy Related RDT&E: Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 140
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2 RDTEN Budget Item Justification
(Exhibit R-2, Page 5 of 10)
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605152N, STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT - NAVY
FY 2008
13.799
FY 2009
6.123
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
2092, NAVAL WARFARE STUDIES
FY 2010
8.938
RDT&E Articles Qty
13.799
6.141detailed mission,
9.161
9.818
9.952
10.187 requirements.
10.337
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
This project supports
capability and technical
analysis of
future naval warfighting
This work
provides the analytical basis for integration and prioritization of overall military capability requirements and acquisition programs in support of executing the Naval Capability Development Process
and development/delivery of Mission Capability Packages, Naval Capability Packages, and Integrated Strategic Capability Plans briefs for CNO. This project replaces warfare analysis efforts
(other than system-level Analyses of Alternatives) previously funded separately by all sponsors.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 140
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, Project Justification
Page 6 of 10
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605152N, STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT
2092, NAVAL WARFARE STUDIES
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Naval Warfighting Assessments
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity
FY 08
FY 09
FY 10
13.324
6.123
6.538
This project supports future Naval warfighting capability assessments, including cost-to-capability assessments; mission level Modeling & Simulation; analysis integration across all warfare
13.799
6.141
9.161
areas; and assessments of legacy and future Programs of Record contribution to future warfighting requirements. These efforts include support for the alignment of Science & Technology
and Future Naval Capability programs to future warfighting capability gaps and integration of Naval warfighting requirements into the Joint Capability Integration and Development System
process. This work provides the analytical underpinning for investment recommendations to CNO; serves as the analytics basis to integrate and prioritize overall warfighting capability
requirements and acquisition programs to support the Naval Capability Development Process; and supports the development of Mission Capability Packages, Naval Capability Packages,
Integrated Strategic Capability Plans, and a capabilities-based and balanced Integrated Sponsor's Program Proposals. This project replaces warfare analysis efforts (other than system-level
Analyses of Alternatives) previously funded separately by all sponsors.
Portfolio Management Decision Support System
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity
FY 08
FY 09
.475
FY 10
2.400
Portfolio Management Decision Support System: An analytic Portfolio Management Methodology to aid Navy leadership with investment decision support. This analytic methodology provides
an assessment process that fosters informed, understandable, repeatable, investment decisions with consistent, pedigreed, and retrievable information. Programs of Record and their
proposed modifications (legacy and future) are assessed on their ability to contribute to future warfighting requirements.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 140
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, Project Justification
Page 7 of 10
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605152N, STUDIES AND ANALYSIS SUPPORT
2092, NAVAL WARFARE STUDIES
BA-6
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Line Item No. & Name
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
Not applicable
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 140
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, Project Justification
Page 8 of 10
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605152N Studie and Analysis Support - Navy
2097/Manpower, Personnel, and Training
COST ($ in Millions)
FY2008
Project Cost
FY2009
0.341
0.290
FY2010
0.780
RDT&E Articles Qty
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
The Chief of Naval Personnel has a continuing need for studies and analysis of manpower and personnel (M&P) policies and programs and critical M&P issues that have Navy-wide implications. This project provides
an essential management tool to: (a) assess the effectiveness of existing M&P policies and programs; (b) identify needs for new policies and programs; (c) determine the required manpower and training mix relative to
changing demographic, societal and legislative/regulatory actions, and to evolving strategic and geopolitical factors; (d) study the impact of M&P programs on Navy accession, attrition, retention, and performance; and,
to (e) develop, validate and/or refine a broad range of M&P forecasting models. The program permits Navy to more effectively utilize Research and Development expertise to respond to emergent M&P issues on a
continuing basis.
(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY: This program is funded under RDT&E operational systems development because it encompasses engineering and development of new end-items prior to production
approval decision.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.140
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 9 of 10
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605152N Studies and Analysis Support
2097/Manpower, Personnel, and Training
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity
FY 08
0.341
FY 09
0.290
FY 10
0.780
(U) FY 2008 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• (U) Assessed Military Healthcare outsourcng - Pharmacy Operations
• (U) Evaluated and recommend alternate enlisted and officer bonus programs and schema (monetary and non-monetary)
• (U) Evaluated and provided lessons learned on the Surface Warfare Officer Training Experiment
• (U) Evaluated Attrition Prediction and Screening Methods for recruits
· (U) FY 2009 ACCOMPLISHMENTS:
• (U) Conducted a cost-benefit analysis of Naval Post Graduate School (NPS) vs. Civilian Institution School (CIVINS) for graduate degrees
• (U) Assessed effectiveness of Active and Reserve Recruiting merger
• (U) Assessed manpower/personnel growth of DDG-51 and CG-47 mid-life upgrade programs
• (U) Evaluated and assess ROGER model and associated algorithms
(U) FY 2010 PLAN :
• (U) Assess Return on Investment (ROI) for Special and Incentive pays (AIP, SDIP, SRB, CSRB, etc)
• (U) Assess impact of Individual Augmentation and GSA detailing on enlisted and officer retention
• (U) Assess Roadmap implementation and status of obtaining FIT 2016
• (U) Assess the potential use and determine appropriate areas to employ Smart Card/CAC Technology.
• (U) Assess Elasticities of PRO Recruiting Model
• (U) Assess viability and means to achieve Billet Based Distribution
• (U) Assess/propose updates and implementation for replacement of Navy Manpower Requirmements System
• (U) Assess Intelligent Workbook and NMPBS
• (U) Assess alternate testing methods for predicting/forecasting Human Performance
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 140
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 10 of 10
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605154N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
Project
Number
& Title
FY 2008
Actual
FY 2009
Estimate
FY 2010
Estimate
Total
PE
47.368
47.500
49.821
0031 MC0AG
7.395
7.648
7.791
0148 CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES, NAVY
39.973
39.852
42.030
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Center for Naval Analyses (CNA) is the Department
of the Navy's (DoN) only Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC). CNA provides independent,
objective, and expert analyses based on its unique access to sensitive data and hands-on exposure to fleet
operations gained through its world-wide field program. CNA's research program is centrally funded by this
program element and is primarily concentrated along one Marine Corps category and thirteen Navy categories of
study called product areas. These product areas are structured to enhance CNA's focus of research and
analysis upon the major present and future needs and issues of the Navy and the Marine Corps. Because of
rapid advances in technology, changes in the fleet, the increasing complexity of weapon systems, and
reductions in manpower, force structure, budgets, the current security environment, and Department of Defense
(DoD) transformation, the Navy and Marine Corps have a greater need for analyses that are sophisticated,
relevant, and timely. CNA is highly qualified to meet that need.
R1 Line Item 141
Page 1 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605154N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
President's Budget 2009
Congressional Program Reductions
Program Adjustments
SBIR/STTR Transfer
President's Budget 2010
FY 2008
47.422
0.000
0.000
-0.054
47.368
FY 2009
49.745
-2.245
0.000
0.000
47.500
FY 2010
51.438
0.000
-1.617
0.000
49.821
PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Technical: Not applicable.
Schedule: Not applicable.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
E. PERFORMANCE METRICS:
CNA is reviewed throughout the research year on several different levels to ensure that research produced is
not duplicated elsewhere. The primary (and most effective) method of review for duplication is the
Contracting Officer's Technical Representative (COTR) review and approval of each and every project proposal
submitted by CNA. This method is highly effective in providing the necessary oversight to ensure that
duplication of effort does not occur. The Marine Corps Studies System (MCSS) maintains a comprehensive
listing of all CNA studies performed for the USMC. The MCSS ensures there are no duplicate analytical efforts
within the USMC. Additionally, the Studies and Analysis Division of Marine Corps Combat Development Command
(MCCDC) provides analytical review of all CNA products for the USMC and integrates the results and
recommendations into a quarterly newsletter and an annual plan for research and analysis. Other evaluation
processes are as follows:
R1 Line Item 141
Page 2 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605154N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES
A) DoN Contract Status Meetings - As part of the CNA oversight process, the ONR Contracting Officer chairs a
monthly meeting with the COTR, the USMC, and members of the CNA Business Support Group to provide guidance
regarding contract management. Issues range from reviewing the Defense Technical Information Center (DTIC)
database requirements to emphasize the contractual requirement that all ongoing research be submitted to DTIC
to ensure against duplication to reviewing CNA's cost effectiveness and efficiency.
B) Award Fee Evaluation Process - As required by CNA's contract with DoN, CNA is evaluated on a semi-annual
basis by the government throughout the entire five year performance period of Contract N00014-05-D-0500. Over
200 sponsors of CNA deliverables provide input regarding CNA's value to their respective organizations. CNA's
support to DoN leadership and management, their timeliness and quality of research, as well as their cost
effectiveness and efficiency are evaluated. CNA's overall performance rating is the primary basis for
determining the amount, if any, of the available award fee earned by CNA.
C) DoN Two-Star and Three-Star Flag Officer Review – DoN Two- and Three-Stars and their equivalent civilian
counterparts meet several times a year to review the current fiscal year's research and provide guidance to
CNA regarding their future research for DoN. These high level meetings are essential to provide CNA with
DoN's guidance to ensure that the research conducted is of the greatest value to DoN. The meetings also serve
as the catalyst for the formation of the CNA Annual Plan; CNA's roadmap for research during the upcoming
fiscal year. The CNA Annual Plan is then submitted to the Deputy Chief of Naval Operations for Integration of
Capabilities and Resources (N8) for final review and acceptance.
D) CNA Comprehensive Review - Prior to contract renewal, CNA, as a FFRDC, must be evaluated to ensure that the
DoN wants to renew their contract for an additional five years. DoN recently completed an exhaustive review
of sponsors' technical needs and mission requirements; DoN's consideration of alternative sources; CNA's
efficiency and effectiveness; CNA's management and cost effectiveness, as well as the establishment criteria
and sponsorship agreement. The CNA Comprehensive Review was approved by ASN (RDA) and accepted by OSD (AT&L).
R1 Line Item 141
Page 3 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605154N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0031
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES
PROJECT TITLE: MC0AG
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
Project FY 2008
Number
Actual
& Title
0031 MC0AG
7.395
FY 2009
Estimate
FY 2010
Estimate
7.648
7.791
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project supports the Marine Corps portion of the
DoN CNA Research Program, and is managed as an element of the Marine Corps Studies System. This program
provides the Marine Corps with independent and objective research and analysis of specific issues/topics
appropriately performed by a FFRDC. As a result of the findings and recommendations of the Fiscal Year 1997
Defense Science Board, the Marine Corps refocused the type of support CNA provides. The CNA maintains a
varied number of field representatives for the Operational Forces Commanders and eight (8) program areas for
CNA to establish and maintain. The program areas are linked to the Marine Corps Advocacy (prepotency), which
are: (1) Policy and Operations; (2) Systems and Tactics; (3) Research, Development and Acquisition; (4)
Infrastructure and Readiness; (5) Manpower, Medical and Training; (6) Resources, Planning and Assessments; (7)
Capabilities, Force Structure and Systems and (8) Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance. Scientific
Analyst support provides six scientific analysts for the following six focus areas: Deputy Commandant (DC),
Plans, Policies and Operations; DC Aviation; DC Installation and Logistics; DC Programs and Resources; DC
Manpower Reserve Affairs; and Director, Manpower Plans (MP) – Manpower and Reserve Affairs (M&RA). The
program continues analytical support for field exercises, Ad Hoc and Quick Response study requirements.
B.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
MARINE CORPS OPERATIONS AND ANALYSIS GROUP
FY 2008
7.395
FY 2009
7.648
FY 2010
7.791
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Completed the following efforts from the FY 2007 Marine Corps Studies System Master Plan (MCSSMP): Quick
Response (QR) - Improving How the Marine Corps Gets to the Fight, QR – USMC Reserve End Strength Model, QR
Study – Improving How the Marine Corps Gets to the Fight, QR Study – USMC Reserve End-Strength Model and
R1 Line Item 141
Page 4 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605154N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0031
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES
PROJECT TITLE: MC0AG
Unmanned Aircraft Systems – Tier II and III Sensor Suite Analysis.
- Initiated the following efforts from the FY08 MCSSMP: MV-22 Aviation Logistics Support, Weapons Tactics and
Instructor Training Oct-Nov 07 (WTI08-01), Weapons Tactics and Instructor Training Feb-Apr 08 (WTI08-02),
Korean Integrated Training Program (KITP) Combined Amphibious Exercise, Security Cooperation Marine Air Ground
Task Force (SC MAGTF), Marine Corps Enterprise Materiel Readiness Study, USMC Strategic Vision Implications
Study, Safety of Flight, Marine Corps Forces South (MARFORSOUTH) Headquarters Relocation, The Effect of Naval
Post Graduate School (NPS) on the Promotion of Marine Corps Officers.
- Provided ten Scientific Analysts (SA) for direct analytical support to Marine Corps Headquarters staff
elements: Deputy Commandant Marine Corps (DCMC) Plans, Policies, and Operations received one SA; DCMC
Installations and Logistics received one SA; DCMC Manpower and Reserve Affairs received three SAs; DCMC
Aviation received one SA; DCMC Combat Development and Integration received two SAs, and DCMC Programs and
Resources received two SAs.
- Provided eight Field Representatives for direct analytical support to the Marine Corps Headquarters staff
agencies. One full time representative each to the following: Commander, Marine Forces Pacific (COMMARFORPAC);
Commanding General, Marine Forces Command (COMMARFORCOM); Commanding General, Marine Corps Forces Special
Operations Command (COMMARSOC); Commanding General, Marine Forces Reserve (COMMARFORRES); Commanding General,
I Marine Expeditionary Force (CG I MEF); Commanding General II Marine Corps Expeditionary Force (CG II MEF);
Commanding General III Marine Expeditionary Force (CG III MEF); and Commanding Officer, Marine Air Weapons
Training Squadron One (MAWTS1).
- Provided analysis support to operating forces exercises, ad hoc support for immediate analytical
requirements, and other support functions which included: general concept development, quick response studies,
CNA self-initiated analysis efforts, administrative support, liaison, travel, and contract award fee.
- Provided formal study and analysis support to the operating forces and headquarters elements included in the
annual MCSSMP.
FY 2009 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY08 less those noted as complete above.
- Initiate high priority study and analysis projects approved in FY09 MCSSMP.
- Provide formal study and analysis support to the operating forces and headquarters elements included in the
annual MCSSMP.
R1 Line Item 141
Page 5 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605154N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0031
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES
PROJECT TITLE: MC0AG
FY 2010 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
- Initiate high priority study and analysis projects approved in FY10 MCSSMP.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
PE 0605873M Marine Corps Program Wide Support
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NON-NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R1 Line Item 141
Page 6 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
DATE: May 2009
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605154N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0148
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES
PROJECT TITLE: CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES, NAVY
Project FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
Number
Actual
Estimate Estimate
& Title
0148 CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES, NAVY
39.973
39.852
42.030
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project supports the Navy's portion of the CNA
Research Program, which is primarily concentrated along thirteen Navy categories of study called product
areas. These product areas include the following: 1) Policy and Operations; 2) Resources, Planning, and
Assessments; 3) Research, Development, and Acquisition; 4) Infrastructure and Readiness; 5) Manpower, Medical,
and Training; 6) Systems and Tactics; 7) Capabilities, Force Structure, and Systems; 8) Intelligence,
Surveillance, and Reconnaissance; 9) Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR); 10) Navy Field Program; 11) Navy
Scientific Analyst Program; 12) Navy Quick Response Projects; and (13) CNA Initiated Projects. CNA's analyses
have resulted in substantial improvements in force structure, fleet effectiveness, and significant cost
avoidance.
B.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES, NAVY
FY 2008
39.973
FY 2009
39.852
FY 2010
42.030
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Continued to address issues of major importance to Navy leadership in the above research areas. CNA’s
Research Program was continually updated to support the Navy efficiently and effectively. Support for the CNA
field program, which assigns analysts to thirty four locations around the world, including at sea, continued
to comprise approximately 20% of the funding.
FY 2009 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY08.
R1 Line Item 141
Page 7 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605154N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0148
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES
PROJECT TITLE: CENTER FOR NAVAL ANALYSES, NAVY
FY 2010 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
PE 0605873M Marine Corps Program Wide Support
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NON-NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R1 Line Item 141
Page 8 of 8
UNCLASSIFIED
DATE: May 2009
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605502N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
Project
Number
& Title
FY 2008
Actual
FY 2009
Estimate
FY 2010
Estimate
Total
PE
326.650
0.399
0.000
0000 UNDIST
1812
1813
1814
1824
1862
1863
1864
1865
2016
2204
17.489
0.000
0.000
NAVAIR SBIR PROGRAM
103.207
0.000
0.000
SPAWAR SBIR PROGRAM
36.329
0.000
0.000
NAVSEA SBIR PROGRAM
63.584
0.000
0.000
CMC SBIR PROGRAM
12.018
0.000
0.000
SSPO SBIR PROGRAM
1.566
0.000
0.000
NAVSUP SBIR PROGRAM
0.800
0.000
0.000
CNR SBIR PROGRAM
33.270
0.000
0.000
SBIR ADMINISTRATION
2.947
0.000
0.000
NAVFAC SBIR PROGRAM
0.800
0.000
0.000
SMALL BUSINESS TECH TRANSFER PROGRAM
25.366
0.000
0.000
R1 Line Item 142
Page 1 of 5
UNCLASSIFIED
DATE: May 2009
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605502N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH
2240 NAVY DUAL USE TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM
1.156
0.000
0.000
2241 SBIR ADMIN - SPAWAR
2.244
0.000
0.000
2242 SBIR ADMIN - NAVSEA
5.279
0.000
0.000
2243 SBIR ADMIN - NAVAIR
6.551
0.000
0.000
2244 SBIR ADMIN - NAVFAC
0.050
0.000
0.000
2245 SBIR ADMIN - NAVSUP
0.050
0.000
0.000
2248 SBIR ADMIN - SSPO
0.097
0.000
0.000
2813 SBIR - NSMA
4.880
0.000
0.000
2814 SBIR ADMIN - NSMA
0.300
0.000
0.000
3201 SBIR CPP - NAVAIR
1.032
0.000
0.000
3202 SBIR CPP - SPAWAR
0.360
0.000
0.000
3203 SBIR CPP - NAVSEA
0.633
0.000
0.000
3204 SBIR CPP - MARINE CORPS
0.120
0.000
0.000
3205 SBIR CPP - ONR
0.522
0.000
0.000
3213 NAVAIR STTR PROGRAM
R1 Line Item 142
Page 2 of 5
UNCLASSIFIED
DATE: May 2009
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605502N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH
6.000
0.000
9999 CONGRESSIONAL PLUS-UPS
0.000
0.399
0.000
0.000
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Small Business Technology Transfer Program
Reauthorization Act of 2001 (Section 9(n)(1) of 15 U.S.C. 638(n)(1)), and reauthorization (S.3026 PL 110-235
dtd 23 May 09), requires "...each Federal agency that has an extramural budget for research or research and
development, in excess of $1,000,000,000..." "shall expend with small business concerns not less than the
percentage of that extramural budget specified in subparagraph (B)...". This Program Element is funded in
accordance with the Small Business Technology Transfer Program Reauthorization Act of 2001.
R1 Line Item 142
Page 3 of 5
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605502N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
President's Budget 2009
Congressional Program Reductions
SBIR/STTR Transfer
Total Congressional Increases
President's Budget 2010
FY 2008
201.450
0.000
125.200
0.000
326.650
PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Technical: Not applicable.
Schedule: Not applicable.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
E. PERFORMANCE METRICS:
No Activity Information
R1 Line Item 142
Page 4 of 5
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2009
0.000
-0.001
0.000
0.400
0.399
FY 2010
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605502N
PROJECT NUMBER: 9999
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: SMALL BUSINESS INNOVATIVE RESEARCH
PROJECT TITLE: CONGRESSIONAL PLUS-UPS
CONGRESSIONAL PLUS-UPS:
AUTONOMOUS POWER MANAGEMENT FOR DISTRIBUTED OPERATION
R1 Line Item 142
Page 5 of 5
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2008
0.000
FY 2009
0.399
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605804N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
Project
Number
& Title
FY 2008
Actual
FY 2009
Estimate
FY 2010
Estimate
Total
PE
20.944
15.571
0.735
0835 TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
0.689
0.711
2296 FEDERAL LAB CONSORTIUM
0.392
0.000
9999 CONGRESSIONAL PLUS-UPS
19.863
14.860
0.735
0.000
0.000
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Technical Information Services program provides
support to achieve affordability in the development of Navy systems by reducing life-cycle costs through the
facilitation of advanced technology associations between U.S. industry and the Navy. Warfighting
effectiveness is enhanced through strategic relationships with industry to commercialize the science and
technology developed by the Naval Research Enterprise and to gain: strategic understanding of industry
Independent Research and Development Programs and plans; access concepts and technologies; and access to
business practices within the civil sector.
R1 Line Item 143
Page 1 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605804N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
President's Budget 2009
Congressional Program Reductions
FTT Assessment
Program Adjustments
Rate/Misc Adjustments
SBIR/STTR Transfer
Total Congressional Increases
President's Budget 2010
FY 2008
21.059
0.000
0.392
0.000
0.000
-0.507
0.000
20.944
FY 2009
0.713
-0.042
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
14.900
15.571
FY 2010
0.739
0.000
0.000
-0.005
0.001
0.000
0.000
0.735
PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Technical: Not applicable.
Schedule: Not applicable.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
E. PERFORMANCE METRICS:
Demonstrate support for technological transitions from the Naval Research Enterprise into industrial and
commercial enterprises supporting Navy programs of record and warfighter needs, by being responsive to Offices
of Research and Technology Applications focal points for technology transfer in their development of
Cooperative Research and Development Agreements (CRADA), and reducing transaction/information exchange
timeframes by 25%.
R1 Line Item 143
Page 2 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605804N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0835
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
PROJECT TITLE: TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
FY 2009
FY 2010
Project FY 2008
Actual
Estimate Estimate
Number
& Title
0835 TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
0.689
0.711
0.735
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The goal for this project is to enhance warfighter
effectiveness by: leveraging industry independent R&D science and technology base; developing strategic
partnerships with industry to transition private sector technology; and transferring appropriate Navydeveloped innovative concepts and inventions to the private sector for purposes of commercialization. (Public
Law 96-480, Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986)
This project also provides the Department of the Navy (DoN) interface to the Office of the Deputy Under
Secretary of Defense for Science and Technology, Office of Technology Transition, and to the Assistant
Secretary of Commerce for Technology Policy for matters relating to policy and reporting requirements for
technology transfer.
B.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
FY 2008
0.689
FY 2009
0.711
FY 2010
0.735
Technical Information Services supports the spin-in and spin-out of research and development performed by Navy
laboratories and industry. This program develops the tools and provides management oversight of the DoN
Domestic Technology Transfer (T2) Program.
R1 Line Item 143
Page 3 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605804N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0835
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
PROJECT TITLE: TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Continued to maintain the network tracking of technology transfer efforts required for Congressional
reporting.
- Continued to increase outreach and marketing efforts.
- Continued the pilot program of Leveraging MBA technology commercialization course to perform intellectual
property assessments, conduct market studies and find potential licensing partners.
- Completed Major overhaul and update of the online Office of Research and Technology Applications
(ORTA)/Technology Transfer training site.
- Completed on-line job performance support and training tools for DoN technology transfer professionals.
- Completed Evaluation of "commercial-off-the-shelf" (COTS) software to enable the ORTA to bundle patents
across labs to enhance the Navy licensing program.
- Completed revising NAVY CRADA Handbook.
- Initiated three new pilot programs: Revising the Defense Technology Transfer Information System (DTTIS)
database; Revising the ONR technology transfer website; and Leveraging with the Naval Research Enterprise
Intern Program (NREIP) to fund student interns to support Navy ORTA activities.
FY 2009 Plans:
-
Continue
Complete
Complete
Initiate
Initiate
all Technical Information Services of FY 2008, less those noted as completed above.
revising the DTTIS database.
revising the ONR technology transfer website.
and complete SECNAVINST 5700 revision.
two new pilot programs.
FY 2010 Plans:
- Continue all Technical Information Services of FY 2009, less those noted as completed above.
- Complete Leveraging MBA technology commercialization course to perform intellectual property assessments,
conduct market studies and find potential licensing partners.
- Initiate effort for Phase II of DTTIS database to include patent licensing tracking.
- Initiate effort for Phase II of ONR technology transfer website to include content management.
- Initiate two new pilot programs.
R1 Line Item 143
Page 4 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605804N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0835
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
PROJECT TITLE: TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NON-NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R1 Line Item 143
Page 5 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605804N
PROJECT NUMBER: 2296
FY 2009
Project FY 2008
Actual
Estimate
Number
& Title
2296 FEDERAL LAB CONSORTIUM
0.392
0.000
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
PROJECT TITLE: FEDERAL LAB CONSORTIUM
FY 2010
Estimate
0.000
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Federal Laboratory Consortium for Technology
Transfer (FLC) was established by Congress under the Federal Technology Transfer Act of 1986 (P.L. 99-502, 20
October 1986, as amended). The FLC, in cooperation with federal laboratories and the private sector, provides
services to enhance the transfer of federally-developed technology to include activities such as: developing
and administering technology transfer training courses and materials; assisting Federal agencies and
laboratories in their technology transfer programs; and providing a clearinghouse for technology transfer
requests.
B.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
FY 2008
0.392
FEDERAL LAB CONSORTIUM
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NON-NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R1 Line Item 143
Page 6 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2009
0.000
FY 2010
0.000
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605804N
PROJECT NUMBER: 9999
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: TECHNICAL INFORMATION SERVICES
PROJECT TITLE: CONGRESSIONAL PLUS-UPS
CONGRESSIONAL PLUS-UPS:
CENTER FOR COMMERCIALIZATION OF ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY (CAT)
FY 2008
2.317
FY 2009
2.493
HTDV
FY 2008
9.715
FY 2009
9.973
INTEGRATED MANUFACTURING ENTERPRISE
FY 2008
1.545
FY 2009
2.394
PACIFIC-BASED JOINT INFO TECH CENTER
FY 2008
6.286
FY 2009
0.000
R1 Line Item 143
Page 7 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY / BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Total PE Cost
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2011
46.865
51.213
60.590
0149 International Cooperative RDT&E
3.530
4.827
5.626
1767 Naval War College/Center for Naval Warfare Studies
3.634
4.125
4.626
2221 Assessment Program BSO 19 and BSO 39
21.476
22.387
25.401
3025 Mid-Range Financial Improvement Plans
1.578
1.567
1.594
16.647
18.307
18.907
3039 CHENG
3028 Operations Integration Group
Quantity of RDT&E Articles
FY 2012
FY 2013
FY2014
FY2015
4.436
N/A
N/A
N/A
(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
International Cooperative
Cooperative RDT&E:
RDT&E:This
Thisproject
projectprovides
providesprogram
program
management,
management,
execution,
execution,
andand
support
support
to implement
to implement
a broad
a broad
rangerange
of cooperative
of cooperative
Naval Naval
Research
Research
and Development,
and Development,
Test and
Test
Evaluation
and Evaluation
(RDT&E) initiatives to improve
(RDT&E)interoperability,
coalition
initiatives to improve
harmonize
coalition
U.S.interoperability,
Navy requirements
harmonize
with allied
U.S. Navy
and friendly
requirements
nations,
with
and
allied
identify
and cooperative
friendly nations,
international
and identify
opportunities,
cooperativeand
international
improve coalition
opportunities.
interoperability.
In addition,Init addition,
developsitcoordinated
develops coherent approaches in
approaches inwith
coordination
consultation
Combatant
with
Commanders
Combatant Commanders
(COCOMs), Chief
(COCOMs),
of NavalChief
Operations
of Naval(CNO)
Operations
N3/5, (CNO),
Office of
Office
Naval
of Research
Naval Research
(ONR) (ONR)
and appropriate
and Maritime
Partner
Partner
nations,
nations,
to sea-based
to sea-based
missile
missile
defense,
defense,
command,
command,
control, communications,
control, communications,
and intelligence
(C4I),
cooperative
acquisition
programs,toand
identifies
technology
to support
the Initiative.
Global Maritime Partnership Initiative. The project scope in FY07 was
computers
and intelligencecomputers
(C4I), cooperative
acquisition
programs,
and identifies
technology
support
the Global
Maritime
Partnership
expanded from primarily North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO)-centric to include a Maritime Domain Awareness/Maritime Situational Awareness (MDA/MSA), Global War on Terrorism (GWOT), and
Irregular
War
emphasis.
have been,
and are
being initiated
a greatly
diverse
groupofofstrategic
maritimeand
countries,
particularly
nascent
andand
littoral
navies, located
in new These efforts generate
Naval
War
College
(NWC)Relationships
research, analysis
and gaming
activities
serve aswith
a focal
point,expanded
stimulus, and major
source
operational
thoughtthose
withinwith
the Navy,
Joint
Interagency
communities.
regions critical
to U.S. security.
The project
was restructured
internally
bothpolitical
maintain
ongoing
internationaland
relationships
and current projects,
while
facilitating
to a growing
global
network
of maritime
strategic
and operational
alternatives,
quantitative
analysis, war
gamingtoand
military
assessments,
provide recommendations
to the
Chief
of Navalsupport
Operations
(CNO) and
Navy
Component
Commanders regarding the
nations under
MDA/MSA
increasing
Irregular
Warfare
requirements.
formulation
and
executionand
of options
for the
President
of the
United States.
Naval War College
Assessment
Program:
(NWC)
Provides
research,
capability
analysis
based
and
planning
gaming assessment
activities serve
for as
Joint
a focal
Capabilities
point, stimulus,
Integration
andand
major
Development
source of strategic
System (JCIDS),
and operational
conducts
thought
analysis
within
to affect
the Navy,
warfighting
Joint and
capability
Interagency
tradescommunities.
and enterprise resources, identifies
needs,
These efforts
gaps, and
generate
overlaps,
strategic
and and
assesses
operational
alternative
alternatives,
solutions
quantitative
to Joint needs.
analysis,
Manages
war gaming
Officeand
of the
political
Chiefmilitary
of Naval
assessments,
Operations and
(OPNAV)
provide
support
recommendations
to Office of to
thethe
Secretary
Chief ofofNaval
Defense
Operations
(OSD)/Navy's
(CNO) and
analytic agenda. Provides
overarching
Navy Component
Planning,
Commanders
Programming
regarding
and Budgeting
the formulation
System
and(PPBS)
execution
analyses
of options
andfor
guidance
the President
for Planning,
of the United
Programming
States. and Budgeting Execution (PPBE) which provides gap analysis and investment strategy and Total Obligation
Authority (TOA) allocation. Provides independent capability analysis directly to Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) and assists in structuring follow-on OPNAV analyses. The program coordinates Navy's position for the Enhanced
Planning Process and conducts Net Assessments. This program serves as the lead campaign analysis for Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV) and supports Concept of Operations (CONOPS) analysis and Chief of Naval
Operations Investment Strategy assessments, all of which prove analytical underpinnings/basis for programmatic decisions of the Navy's top leadership regarding the integration of all Navy warfare and support requirements. This
program is dual-hated as the head of CNO's Capability Analysis Group and serves the CNO directly as an independent assessor providing a broad-view perspective across the Navy staff apart from resource sponsors, with an
integrated look at both warfighting and warfighting support programs. Program supports the world class modeling efforts to attain a level of modeling and simulation capability that is world class and establishes OPNAV as a leader in
the Department of Defense (DoD) modeling and simulation community. Provides the CNO alternatives in assessing the implications imbedded within resource decisions in a quantified context of costs versus capability versus risk.
This program provides independent analytic support to Navy leadership in conjunction with various executive level decision forums. The Assessment Program develops tools and analytical methodologies that assist in evaluating Navy
programs and provides technical leadership for the analysis functional area of Naval Modeling and Simulation.
Exhibit R-2 RDTEN Budget Item Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
1 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY /
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
BA-6
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (Cont.):
Capital AssetProgram:
Assessment
Management
Provides
System:
capability
This project
based supports
planning the
assessment
Researchfor
Development
Joint Capabilities
Test &Integration
Evaluation,and
Navy
Development
(RDT&E,N)System
and Office
(JCIDS),
of Naval
conducts
Research
analysis
(ONR)
to affect
portionwarfighting
of the larger
capability
DoD and
trades
Navy-wide
and enterprise
effort to
resources, the
implement
identifies
Financial
needs,
Improvement
gaps, andPlan
overlaps,
(FIP). and
Corrective
assesses
actions
alternative
required
solutions
to resolve
to known
Joint needs.
deficiencies
Manages
and determine
Office of the
resource
Chief of
requirements
Naval Operations
(people(OPNAV)
and systems)
support
have
tobeen
Officeidentified.
of the Secretary
Funding of
beyond
Defense
FY
(OSD)/Navy's
2007
is for the analytic
sustainment
agenda.
of the
Provides
clean and
overarching
auditable Planning,
statementsProgramming
for RDT&E,N/ONR.
and Budgeting System (PPBS) analyses and guidance for Planning, Programming and Budgeting Execution (PPBE) which provides
gap analysis and investment strategy and Total Obligation Authority (TOA) allocation. Provides independent capability analysis directly to Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) and assists in structuring follow-on
CHENG:
funds the The
Assistant
Secretary
of the Navy's
Navy for
Research,
Development
and Acquisition
RD&A) Chief
Engineer (RDAThis
CHENG)
to develop
andthe
implement
architecture-based
systems
engineering
OPNAV analyses.
program
coordinates
position
for the
Enhanced Planning
Process(ASN
and conducts
Net Assessments.
program
serves as
lead campaign
analysis for Office
of the
Chief of
Naval Operations
(OPNAV)
and
Operations
(CONOPS)
and Chief
NavalThis
Operations
Investment
Strategy assessments,
all basis
of which
prove analytical
underpinnings/basis
for
processes,
methods
and tools
thatsupports
assure Concept
integratedofand
interoperable
systemsanalysis
are delivered
to theoffleet.
project provides
the mission-oriented
technical
for implementing
capability-based
acquisition
programmatic within
decisions
of the Navy'softop
leadership
all Navy
warfare
support
requirements.
This program
is dual-hated
as the
head of CNO'scomputer
Capabilityand
Analysis
Group(C4I)
and
management
the Department
Navy
(DON) toregarding
engineerthe
andintegration
field Navyofand
Marine
Corps and
combat
systems,
weapon systems,
and command,
control,
communication,
intelligence
serves thethat
CNO
directly
as an
assessor
providing
a broad-view perspective
staffis apart
from resource
sponsors,
with an integrated
look at both
warfighting
andatwarfighting
support
programs
must
operate
as independent
family-of-systems
(FoS)
or system-of-systems
(SoS). The across
focus ofthe
thisNavy
project
on identifying
the functions,
relationships,
and connections
between
systems
both the force
and
programs.
Program
the world
classand
modeling
efforts to
attain
level of modeling
simulationtocapability
thatframework
is world class
and establishes
OPNAV
as aby
leader
in the capability
Department
of Defense
unit
level and
across supports
warfare mission
areas,
encompasses
three
keyaelements:
Systemsand
Engineering
provide the
for making
engineering
decisions
warfighting
at the
FoS/SoS(DoD)
level
modeling
and simulation
the CNOdecision-making
alternatives in assessing
the implications
within resource
decisions in a quantified
context
of costs
versus
capability versus
risk. This
program
and
supports
consistent community.
engineering Provides
and investment
across Navy
and Marine imbedded
Corps programs
within capability-based
acquisition
portfolios.
Naval
Collaborative
Engineering
Environment
provides independent
analytic support
to Navy
leadership
in conjunction
with variousand
executive
level decision
forums.
The Assessment
develops
tools
and Fleet
analytical
methodologies
thatExecutive
assist in
development
and implementation
as a DON
enterprise
resource
for Naval integration
interoperability
information
to enable
collaboration Program
and decision
support
among
organizations,
Program
Offices,
Program
Managers,
Systems
Commands,
prime contractors,
Resource/Warfare
Sponsors
and
Comptroller
organizations. Standards, Policies and Guidelines engineering and technical staff to implement
evaluating
Navy programs
and
provides
technical leadership
for the analysis
functional area
of Naval
Modeling
and Simulation.
DON, OSD and Joint integration and interoperability and Anti-Tamper requirements.
Capital Asset Management System: This project supports the Research Development Test & Evaluation, Navy (RDT&E,N) and Office of Naval Research (ONR) portion of the larger DoD and Navy-wide effort to
Operations
Integration
Classified
implement the
FinancialGroup:
Improvement
Plan (FIP). Corrective actions required to resolve known deficiencies and determine resource requirements (people and systems) have been identified. Funding beyond FY
2007 is for the sustainment of the clean and auditable statements for RDT&E,N/ONR.
CHENG: funds the Assistant Secretary of the Navy for Research, Development and Acquisition (ASN RD&A) Chief Engineer (RDA CHENG) to develop and implement architecture-based systems engineering
processes, methods and tools that assure integrated and interoperable systems are delivered to the fleet. This project provides the mission-oriented technical basis for implementing capability-based acquisition
management within the Department of Navy (DON) to engineer and field Navy and Marine Corps combat systems, weapon systems, and command, control, communication, computer and intelligence (C4I)
programs that must operate as family-of-systems (FoS) or system-of-systems (SoS). The focus of this project is on identifying the functions, relationships, and connections between systems at both the force and
unit level and across warfare mission areas, and encompasses three key elements: Systems Engineering to provide the framework for making engineering decisions by warfighting capability at the FoS/SoS level
and supports consistent engineering and investment decision-making across Navy and Marine Corps programs within capability-based acquisition portfolios. Naval Collaborative Engineering Environment
development and implementation as a DON enterprise resource for Naval integration and interoperability information to enable collaboration and decision support among Fleet organizations, Program Executive
Offices, Program Managers, Systems Commands, prime contractors, Resource/Warfare Sponsors and Comptroller organizations. Standards, Policies and Guidelines engineering and technical staff to implement
DON, OSD and Joint integration and interoperability and Anti-Tamper requirements. Program increase in FY 2007 implements DON Anti-Tamper program to protect critical technology investments.
Exhibit R-2 RDTEN Budget Item Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
2 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2 RDT&E Budget Item Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
DATE:
May 2009
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
C. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
Funding:
FY09 President's Budget
FY10 President's Budget
Total Adjustments
FY 2008
48.441
46.865
-1.576
FY 2009
51.568
51.213
-0.355
FY2010
52.762
60.590
7.828
Summary of Adjustments:
Congressional Adjustments
Program Adjustments
Rate/Misc Adjustments
-0.304
-1.576
-1.576
-0.051
8.693
-0.865
-0.355
7.828
Schedule:
Not Applicable
Technical:
Not Applicable
Exhibit R-2 RDTEN Budget Item Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
3 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
FY 2008
3.530
FY 2009
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0149 INTERNATIONAL COOP RDT&E
FY 2010
4.827
5.626
RDT&E Articles Qty
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
This project provides program management, execution, and support to implement a broad range of cooperative Naval Research and Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) initiatives to
improve coalition interoperability, harmonize U.S. Navy requirements with allied and friendly nations, and identify cooperative international opportunities, and improve coalition interoperability. In
addition, it develops coherent approaches in coordination with Combatant Commanders (COCOMs), Chief of Naval Operations (CNO),
(CNO) N3/5,
OfficeOffice
of Naval
of Naval
Research
Research
(ONR)(ONR)
and appropriate
and appropriate
Partner
Partner nations,
nations,
to sea-based
to sea-based
missile defense,
missile defense,
command,
command,
control, communications,
control, communications,
computers
computers
and intelligence
and intelligence
(C4I), cooperative
(C4I), cooperative
acquisition
acquisition
programs,
programs,
and identifies
and identifies
technology
technology
to support
to support
the Global
the
Global Maritime
Maritime
Partnership
Partnership
Initiative.
Initiative.
The project scope was
in FY07
expanded
was expanded
from primarily
from primarily
North Atlantic
North Treaty
AtlanticOrganization
Treaty Organization
(NATO)-centric
(NATO)-centric
to include
toan
include
Overseas
a Global
Contingency
War on Terrorism
Operations
(GWOT),
(OCO),and
and Maritime
MaritimeDomain
DomainAwareness
Awareness
(MDA) emphasis. Relationships have been, and are being initiated with a greatly expanded and diverse group of maritime countries, particularly those with nascent and littoral navies, located in
new regions critical to U.S. security. The project was restructured internally to both maintain ongoing international relationships and projects, while preparing to facilitate support for a global
network of maritime nations under MDA and increase OCO-related
GWOT-related
support
support
requirements.
requirements.
Ongoing cooperative
On-going
cooperativeRDT&E
RDT&Eprograms,
programs,projects
projectsand
andexchanges
exchangesare
arepursued
pursuedto
toidentify
identifycooperative
cooperativeacquisition
acquisitionprograms,
programs,enhance
enhanceOCO
GWOT
efforts
efforts
and
and
MDA
MDA
development,
development,
fill fill
capability
capability
gaps,
gaps,
improve US/coalition
U.S./coalitioninteroperability,
interoperability,and
andset
setstandardization
standardizationwith
withinternational
internationalpartners.
partners.Such
Suchefforts
effortshave
haveresulted
resultedin:in:
1. Negotiating and developing approximately 57 international
International RDT&E Agreements annually with allied and friendly nations;
2. Executing over 300 Information Exchange Annexes (IEAs) with foreign partners;
3. Improving IEA information dissemination with allied and friendly countries and within Department of the Navy (DoN);
4. Leading Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV) input to Office of the Under Secretary of Defense (OUSD) Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics (AT&L) Foreign Comparative Test
(FCT) Program, Coalition Warfare Program, and Technology Transfer Security Assistance Review Boards (TTSARB).
5. Represent the US Navy in Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)
(OSD)-directed
directed Armaments Cooperation Forums, including the Conference of NATO Armaments Directors’ groups {NATO Naval
Armaments Group (NNAG)}, and Senior National Representative-Maritime (SNR-M);
6. Funding of various international RDT&E support databases including Technical Project Officer (TPO), International Agreement Generators, Information/Data Exchange Agreements, and
Project Agreements/Memorandums of Understanding;
7. Leading the Engineering and Scientist Exchange Program (ESEP);
8. Overseeing OPNAV input to Foreign Comparative Testing (FCT) Program and OSD Coalition Warfare (CWP) Program.
This project also hosts Navy’s contribution to funding requirements directed by the Joint Requirement Oversight Council (JROC) for specific efforts cost shared across the services. Projects
supported include Critical Infrastructure Protection – Mission Assurance Assessments (CIP-MAA) and Multiple Unified Simulation Environment (MUSE) requirements.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
4 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0149 INTERNATIONAL COOP RDT&E
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION (continued):
Performance Metrics:
The Navy International Cooperative RDT&E Project 0149 supports the implementation of many international cooperative program activities throughout the Department of the Navy (DoN) RDT&E communities.
The project funds DoN participation in NATO and OSD
OSD-lead
lead Armaments Cooperation as well as DoN
DoN-lead
lead international
international cooperation
cooperation that
that promote
promote coalition
coalition interoperability
interoperability and
and set
set standards
standards with
with international
international
partners. The focused activities under Project 0149 maximize the DoN's efforts by leveraging international technologies and funding to fill capabilities gaps, gain access to foreign research and testing data,
and avoid duplication of research and development efforts. The performance goals/metrics are, in cooperation with Maritime Partner nations, to set and harmonize requirements, utilize respective technologies,
encourage financial contributions and facilities use, and support forums and work that reduce DoN funding requirements.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
5 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
0149 INTERNATIONAL COOP RDT&E
BA-6
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
International Coop
FY 08
3.530
FY 09
4.827
FY 10
5.626
FY08 Accomplishments:
- Maintained internal DoN international databases to support international cooperative activities and projects with allies. Assessed functional ability to integrate DoN international databases across OPNAV
departments to improve leveraging of program dollars, fielding of better products and speeding delivery.
-Continued to support Maritime Theater Missile Defense Forum that obtained $9.6M in R&D monies from partner nation contributions. The multi-lateral forum (7 Maritime Partner countries and the US Navy) entered
into four International Agreements (Battle Management, Command, Control, Communications, Computers and Intelligence (BMC4I); Distributed Engineering Plant, Open Architecture and Modeling and Simulation
(M&S).
- Continued US Navy International Bench, a new internet-based connector and composeable tool to enhance collaboration between US military and agency personnel engaged in international work.
- Continued to lead US Navy's participation in OUSD AT&L’s Foreign Comparative Test (FCT) Program and the Coalition Warfare Program (CWP) selection processes to meet emerging military capability
requirements.
- Continued execution of over 300 Information/Date Exchange Agreements (IEA/DEA) with more than 30 countries.
- Continued execution and support of placement of US Navy and partner nation engineers and scientists under OSD's Engineer and Scientist Exchange Program (ESEP).
- Funded various evolving potential cooperative exchanges and projects contributing to MDA/MSA and Irregular Warfare including Multi-Mission Aircraft, Broad Area Maritime Surveillance, Submarine Littoral
Weapons System, and Swimmer Engagement.
- Coordinated US Navy support to OUSD (AT&L) International Cooperation office.
- Supported new CNO-initiated Strategy Dialogue with Australia, including Air and Expeditionary Warfare Working Groups for mutual development of requirements and projects.
- Supported NATO Naval Armaments Group (NNAG) and Five Power Groups on cooperative programs including Harbor Protection, Electronic Warfare, and Defense Against Terrorism (DAT) trials.
FY 09 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY 08.
FY 02
FY 03
FY 04
FY 05
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
0.200
0.200
0.100
0.400
FY 10 Plans:
RDT&E
Articles Quantity
1
1
- Continue all efforts of FY 09
- Initiate Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) simulation improvements via the Air Force’s Multiple Unified Simulation Environment (MUSE) synthetic environment, per the Joint Requirements Oversight Council
Memorandum (JROCM) 233-07.
- Initiate Critical Infrastructure Protection – Mission Assurance Assessment (CIP-MAA) recommendations as applicable to the Global War on Terror (GWoT) and responses to the Critical Infrastructure Protection
Action Plan, per the Joint Requirements Oversight Council Memorandum (JROCM) 017-07
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
6 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
0149 INTERNATIONAL COOP RDT&E
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not Applicable
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable
E. MAJOR PERFORMERS
No performer in this PE received more than 15% or $10 million of the program.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
7 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
FY 2008
FY 2009
3.634
4.125
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
1767 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE STRATEGIC STUDIES SUPT
FY 2010
4.626
RDT&E Articles Qty
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
focal
point,
stimulus,
and
major
source
of strategic
andand
operational
thought
within
the Navy,
JointJoint
and and Interagency communities.
Naval War College
College (NWC)
(NWC) research,
research,analysis
analysisand
andgaming
gamingactivities
activitiesserve
serveasasa a
focal
point,
stimulus,
and
major
source
of strategic
operational
thought
within
the Navy,
alternatives,
tactical
imperatives,
quantitative
analysis, war
gaming, political-military
assessments, and
Interagency
These
effortscommunities.
generate strategic
Theseand
efforts
operational
generate
alternatives,
strategic and
tactical
operational
imperatives,
quantitative
analysis,
war gaming,
political-military
assessments,
and provide recommendations
to the Chief of Naval Operations
NavalCommanders
Operations (CNO),
Fleet
and
numbered
Fleet Commanders
regarding
theofformulation
and execution of maritime
provide Fleet
(CNO),
recommendations
Commanders to
and
the
numbered
Chief of Fleet
regarding
the Commanders
formulation and
execution
of maritime
options for the
President
the United States.
options for the President of the United States.
Performance Metrics:
Performance
Metrics:
This
project provides
research, analysis and war gaming to meet the needs of the Secretary of the Navy, the Chief of Naval Operations, and Fleet Commanders. Performance is measured in terms of both the
analysis
andand
warthe
gaming
needs for
of the
of research
the Navy,products
the Chiefcan
of Naval
Operations, and
Fleet
Commanders.
Performance
is products and war games are
This project
quantity
and provides
quality ofresearch,
war games,
analysis
extenttotomeet
whichthe
demand
warSecretary
games and
be accommodated
within
funding
levels. Results
of research
which demand
forand
warpractical
games and
researchsuch
products
can doctrine,
be accommodated
measured through
evaluated
in termscustomer
of both the
feedback
quantityand
andthe
quality
extentoftowar
which
games,
findings
analysis
are incorporated
and the extent
intotofollow-on
research
applications
as Navy
operationalwithin
tactics, and programming decisions
funding
levels.
of research
products
and war&games
are (PPBE)
evaluated
through customer feedback and the extent to which findings are incorporated into follow-on research and
made
during
theResults
Planning,
Programming,
Budgeting
Execution
process.
practical applications such as Navy doctrine, operational tactics, and programming decisions made during the Planning, Programming, Budgeting & Execution (PPBE) process.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
8 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
1767 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE STRATEGIC STUDIES SUPT
BA-6
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
Strategic Studies
FY08
1.087
FY09
1.116
FY10
1.133
Naval War College (NWC) conducts research in strategic studies in response to tasking from the Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV), Chief of Naval Operation (CNO), Fleet Commanders, numbered Fleet Commanders,
and Combatant Commanders. NWC also hosts the activities of the CNO's Strategic Studies Group (SSG). The CNO SSG is a select group of senior naval officers handpicked by the CNO, who report to him in the
development of revolutionary warfighting and operational concepts, such as Sea Strike and FORCEnet.
FY08 Accomplishments:
- Continued to conduct research and analysis projects and provided supporting events for Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV), the numbered Fleets, Navy Component Commanders, and the Combatant
Commanders. Projects directly supported warfighting analysis requirements for numbered fleet commanders and were expanded to include Commander Seventh Fleet (C7F) with particular focus on India and the
Indian Ocean.
- Continued to support the OPNAV Staff on the Proliferation Security Initiative (PSI).
- CNO SSG completed tasking from the CNO to SSG XXVI to address "fighting in cyberspace in 2030."
FY09 Plans:
- Continue to conduct research and analysis projects and provide supporting events for OPNAV, the numbered Fleets, Navy Component Commanders, and the Combatant Commanders. Projects in direct support of
numbered fleet commanders are expected to grow in scope.
- Continue to support the OPNAV Staff on tasked research projects.
- CNO SSG tasking from the CNO to SSG XXVII.
- Initiate revolutionary operating and warfighting concepts for 2035 and beyond under CNO tasking.
FY10 Plans:
- Continue to conduct research and analysis projects and provide supporting events for Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV), the numbered Fleets, Navy Component Commanders, and the Combatant
Commanders.
- Continued to support the OPNAV Staff on operational and strategic level of war tasked research projects.
- CNO SSG tasking from the CNO to SSG XXVIII.
- Initiate revolutionary operating and warfighting concepts for 2035 and beyond under CNO tasking.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
9 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
1767 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE STRATEGIC STUDIES SUPT
BA-6
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
Naval War Gaming Support
FY 08
1.692
FY 09
1.767
FY 10
2.224
Naval War College (NWC) conducts strategic and operational war gaming and research for Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV), the numbered Fleets, Fleet Commanders, and the Combatant Commanders.
Each year, 50-60 major war games and associated events provide support to efforts that explore and analyze military, political, informational and economic aspects of differing strategic and operational scenarios and tactical
imperatives.
FY08 Accomplishments:
- Continued to conduct 55-60 major war games and related events in support of OPNAV, the numbered Fleets, Fleet Commanders, and the Combatant Commanders.
- Continued to conduct operational research and experimentation for Joint Force Maritime Component Commander (JFMCC) concept development via JFMCC Center of Excellence.
- Continued to conduct analytical research on key operational challenges such as theater Anti Submarine Warfare (ASW), submarine payloads, seaborne maritime missile defense, global maritime security, maritime homeland
defense, maritime domain awareness, and Sea Basing.
- Continued to conduct research supporting war games co-sponsored with Naval Warfare Development Command (NWDC) and US Joint Forces Command.
- Continued to develop advanced war gaming analytical methods and tools.
- Continued to conduct analytic research on effects based operations and systems thinking for Naval Forces Europe (NAVEUR) and Navy Component for Central Command (NAVCENT).
- Continued to conduct research in advanced adaptive Command and Control (C2) for Office of Naval Research (ONR).
- Continued to develop educational materials for Naval Operations Planners Course (NOPC).
- Continued to conduct high level policy analytic research and gaming addressing Proliferation Security Initiatives for Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD).
- Continued to support CNO Maritime Strategy and operational concepts through analytical war gaming.
FY09 Plans:
- Continued all efforts of FY08.
FY10 Plans:
- Continued all efforts of FY09.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
10 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
1767 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE STRATEGIC STUDIES SUPT
BA-6
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
Warfare Analysis and Research
FY 08
0.406
FY 09
0.490
FY 10
0.501
Naval War College (NWC) supports senior decision-makers from the Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, the numbered Fleets, Fleet Commanders and Combatant Commanders in reaching well-informed,
objective decisions on strategic, operational and programmatic issues through collaborative research which integrates traditional research and analysis with advanced decision support tools. Each year, 30-40 events provide
support to efforts that explore and analyze a wide range of issues and their associated factors which address future needs of the Service. These issues and decisions can then be further tested and evaluated in conjunction
with our wargaming center.
FY08 Accomplishments:
- Continued to conduct major decision events in support of Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV), the numbered Fleets, Fleet Commanders, and the Combatant Commanders. Projects were in direct support of
warfighting analysis requirements for numbered fleet commanders and were expanded to include Commander Seventh Fleet (C7F) with particular focus on India and the Indian Ocean
- Conducted analytical research on key strategic and operational challenges such as maritime ballistic missile defense, proliferation security initiative, global maritime security, maritime situational awareness, maritime
operations headquarters, interconnectivity, and multi-service force deployment.
- Continued additional evaluation of concepts and decision events in conjunction with war gaming center.
- Conducted research targeted at the strategic and policy level decision making within China
- Continued to provide direct support to NWC student research groups and war gaming.
- 30-40 major decision are conducted in support of there efforts.
FY09 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY08.
FY10 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
11 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
1767 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE STRATEGIC STUDIES SUPT
BA-6
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
NWC Student Research Projects
FY 08
0.149
FY 09
0.152
FY 10
0.155
Selected, top performing Naval War College (NWC) students to conduct focused research and analysis of current and future strategic and operational challenges and tactical imperatives. These students are
organized under the supervision of the Mahan Scholars Program and the Halsey Group Program.
FY08 Accomplishments:
- Conducted focused research, analysis and war gaming of current and future strategic/operational challenges and tactical imperatives by the Halsey Group and Mahan Scholars programs.
- Research groups continued to conduct focused research, analysis and free-play war gaming of current and future operational challenges and tactical imperatives arising from regional threats, homeland
defense and access denial efforts at the high end of the conflict spectrum in the Pacific, European Command (EUCOM), Central Command (CENTCOM) and Northern Command (NORTHCOM) area of
responsibility (AOR). Research and analysis efforts continued in those areas above, and was expanded to include a detailed focus on counter-targeting, operational deception, and countering information
denial and missile defense at the theater joint operational level.
- Conducted research for Deputy Secretary of Defense (DEPSECDEF) on matters tasked to the College.
FY09 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY08.
FY10 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
12 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
1767 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE STRATEGIC STUDIES SUPT
BA-6
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
Maritime Headquarters (MHQ)/Maritime Operations (MOC) Analysis
FY 08
0.300
FY 09
0.600
FY 10
0.613
Formerly JFMCC/Worldwide Naval Component Commanders (WNCC). Naval War College (NWC) conducts research and analysis at the operational level of war, including direct support for the Maritime
Headquarters (MHQ) with Maritime Operations Center (MOC) and Combined/Joint Forces Maritime Component Commander (C/JFMCC) activities. These activities include support for concept and doctrine
development of numbered fleet war games, exercises, education, research and analysis. NWC is responsible for development of Professional Military Education for Naval Component Commanders and Numbered
Fleet Staff personnel, and the Numbered Fleet Commander, including education and research initiatives in support of concept of operations development, training and C/JFMCC advisory and assist team.
FY08 Accomplishments:
- Conducted research and analysis projects and provide support of MHQ with MOC and C/JFMCC activities and direct support for the numbered Fleet Commanders. Efforts include assist team visits in support of
analysis and definition of maritime operational processes, including execution battle management, tasking subordinates, operational level planning and operational/effects assessment.
- Initiated research into the required competencies for Maritime Staff Operations Course for officer and enlisted personnel to successful operate at the operational level of war.
FY09 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY08.
FY10 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
13 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
1767 NAVAL WAR COLLEGE STRATEGIC STUDIES SUPT
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not Applicable
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
14 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
FY 2008
21.476
FY 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
2221 Assessment Program
FY 2010
22.387
25.401
RDT&E Articles Qty
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
Project 2221, Assessment Program, provides capability based planning assessment for Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS), conducts analysis to affect warfighting capability trades and
capability trades
enterprise
resources,
identifies needs,
gaps,
and overlaps,
assesses
alternative
Joint needs.
Manages
Office
of theManages
Chief of Naval
support to Office
of the
Secretary of Defense
and enterprise
resources,
identifies
needs,and
gaps,
and overlaps,
and solutions
assessestoalternative
solutions
to Joint
needs.
Office Operations
of the Chief(OPNAV)
of Naval Operations
(OPNAV)
suppor
(OSD)/Navy's
agenda.
Provides
overarching
Planning,
Programming
Budgeting
System Programming
(PPBS) analyses
guidance
for Planning,
and Budgeting
Execution
(PPBE) which provides gap
to Office of theanalytic
Secretary
of Defense
(OSD)/Navy's
analytic
agenda.
Provides and
overarching
Planning,
and and
Budgeting
System
(PPBS) Programming
analyses and guidance
for Planning,
Programming
analysis
and investment
Total
Obligation
Authorityand
(TOA)
allocation.
Provides
capability
analysis
to Chief
of Naval
Operationscapability
(CNO) and
assists
in structuring
OPNAV analyses.
and Budgeting
Executionstrategy
(PPBE) and
which
provides
gap analysis
investment
strategy
and independent
Total Obligation
Authority
(TOA)directly
allocation.
Provides
independent
analysis
directly
to Chieffollow-on
of
The
program
coordinates
Navy's
position
for the Enhanced
conducts
Assessments.
program
serves
as the Planning
lead campaign
analysis
for OfficeNet
of Assessments.
the Chief of Naval
Naval
Operations
(CNO) and
assists
in structuring
follow-onPlanning
OPNAV Process
analyses.and
The
programNet
coordinates
Navy'sThis
position
for the
Enhanced
Process
and conducts
ThisOperations (OPNAV) and
supports
Concept
Operations
(CONOPS)
analysis
andof
Chief
of Naval
Operations
Investment
Strategy
assessments,
all of
prove(CONOPS)
analytical underpinnings/basis
forNaval
programmatic
decisions of the Navy's top
program serves
asofthe
lead campaign
analysis
for Office
the Chief
of Naval
Operations
(OPNAV)
and supports
Concept
of which
Operations
analysis and Chief of
Operations
leadership
the integrationall
ofof
allwhich
Navy prove
warfare
and support
requirements. This
program is dual-hatted
head oftop
CNO's
Capability
Analysis
and serves
the CNO
directly
an independent assessor
Investmentregarding
Strategy assessments,
analytical
underpinnings/basis
for programmatic
decisions as
of the Navy's
leadership
regarding
theGroup
integration
of all Navy
warfare
and as
support
providing
a broad-view
perspective
across the
Navy
staffofapart
from
resourceAnalysis
sponsors,
withand
an integrated
both warfighting
and warfighting
support
programs.
Program
supports the
world
class modeling efforts to
requirements.
This program
is dual-hatted
as the
head
CNO's
Capability
Group
serves thelook
CNOatdirectly
as an independent
assessor
providing
a broad-view
perspective
across
the
attain
a level
of modeling
and simulation
that is world
andwarfighting
establishes
OPNAV
as a leader
in programs.
the Department
of Defense
modeling
simulation
community.
the CNO alternatives in
Navy staff
apart
from resource
sponsors,capability
with an integrated
lookclass
at both
and
warfighting
support
Program
supports(DoD)
the world
classand
modeling
efforts
to attain a Provides
level of modeling
assessing
the implications
imbedded
resource
decisions
in a quantified
context
costs versus
capability(DoD)
versusmodeling
risk. This
program
provides
independent
analytic
support
to Navy leadership
in conjunction with
and simulation
capability that
is world within
class and
establishes
OPNAV
as a leader
in theof
Department
of Defense
and
simulation
community.
Provides
the CNO
alternatives
in assessing
various
executive
level decision
Assessment
Program context
develops
analytical
methodologies
in evaluating
Navy programs
and provides
technical
leadershipinfor the analysis functional area of
the implications
imbedded
withinforums.
resourceThe
decisions
in a quantified
of tools
costsand
versus
capability
versus risk. that
Thisassist
program
provides independent
analytic
support to
Navy leadership
Naval
Modeling
Simulation.
conjunction
with and
various
executive level decision forums. The Assessment Program develops tools and analytical methodologies that assist in evaluating Navy programs and provides technical
leadership for the analysis functional area of Naval Modeling and Simulation.
Joint Mission Assessment Studies supports the development of platform specific studies and Capability Based Assessments (CBAs), an analytical effort resulting in Functional Area Analysis (FAA), Functional Needs
Analysis (FNA), and Functional Solutions Analysis (FSA). Efforts provide added analytical rigor relative to program's maturation under the Joint Capabilities, Integration, and Development System (JCIDS) and support
warfare integration initiatives.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
15 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
2221 Assessment Program
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Navy Standard Scenarios
FY 08
1.487
FY 09
1.520
FY 10
1.551
FY08 Accomplishments:
Developed, updated and maintained detailed level Navy Standard scenarios based on Defense Planning Guidance. Developed alternative scenarios in support of Quadrennial Defense Review
(QDR), Joint studies, and Navy resource analyses. Developed, updated and maintained analytic baselines for the Major Combat Operations (MCO) based on Defense Planning Guidance.
FY09 Plans:
Continue all efforts of FY08.
FY10 Plans:
Continue all efforts of FY09.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
16 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
2221 Assessment Program
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Capability Based Assessments
FY 08
FY 09
FY 10
2.797
2.864
2.922
FY 08 Accomplishments:
Assessed capability sponsors' products for Navy senior leadership decision forums. Performed collaborative assessment with capability sponsors. Proactively participated in Capability Sponsors'
Integrated Processing Teams (IPTs). Presented opposing analytically-based points of view to the CNO and Navy senior leadership. Provided analytically-based decision recommendations to CNO for
both warfighting and support areas. Developed CNO Investment strategy recommendations and perform assessments for Program Review and Program Objective Memorandum (POM). Assessed
capability sponsor's products for senior leadership decision forums. Conducted Verification, Validation & Accreditation (VV&A) of warfare, performance, and pricing models. Conducted Overseas
Contingency Operations (OCO)Capabilities-Based Assessment that provided a rapid and scalable process to utilize a Concept of Operation (CONOPS) and developed investment strategy and a capability
roadmap. Conducted Tactical Aircraft (TACAIR) Recapitalization alternatives and Theater Ballistic Missile Defense (TBMD) cost capability trade off assessments. Conducted independent assessment of
Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW) . Conducted weapons safety and sea basing capabilities assessments. Conducted Intelligence-Surveillance-Reconnaissance (ISR) and Meteorological and
Oceanographic (METOC) assessment to determine the optimal mix of naval ISR and METOC sensors, platforms, and processing, analysis and fusion disposition to support Major Combat Operations
(MCOs), the OCO, and intelligence preparation of the environment for both MCOs and OOC. Performed Capabilities-Based Assessments (CBAs) to meet the requirements of current and future
scenarios, and make strategic decisions within a constrained economic framework.
FY09 Plans:
Continue all efforts of FY08.
FY10 Plans:
Continue all efforts of FY09.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
17 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
DATE:
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
2221 Assessment Program
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Campaign Analysis - Modeling and Simulation
FY08
6.166
FY09
6.690
FY10
6.449
FY08 Accomplishments:
Developed and maintained common baselines from which campaign excursions and mission-level analyses are executed. Identified, developed, and improved data and modeling. Led Navy's participation in
Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)/Joint Staff analytic agenda, baseline development, and collection of data. Provided coordination across the Navy. Brokered agreed upon assumptions, Concept of
Operations (CONOPS), scenarios and data. Led campaign analysis for Office of the Chief of Naval Operations (OPNAV). Conducted modeling and simulation support for ongoing OPNAV missile defense
analysis requirements.
FY09 Plans:
Continue all efforts of FY08.
FY10 Plans:
Continue all efforts of FY09.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
18 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
2221 Assessment Program
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
OSD/Joint Staff Study Analysis & Assessment
FY 08
FY 09
FY10
1.814
1.857
1.895
FY08 Accomplishments:
Coordinated/led Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)/Navy's Analytic Agenda in Defense Planning Scenario (DPS), Multi-Service Force Deployment (MSFD), Enhanced Planning Process (EPP), Strategic
Planning Guidance (SPG), and participated in Capability Sponsors' Integrated Processing Teams (IPTs). Provided overarching Planning, Programming and Budgeting System (PPBS) analyses and guidance.
Provided analytically-based decision recommendations to Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) for Joint warfighting and support areas. Conducted net assessments and provided independent analytic support to
Navy leadership in conjunction with various executive level decision forums. Served as the Navy's lead to Joint Requirements Oversight Council (JROC), Joint Capabilities Board (JCB), and Functional
Capabilities Board (FCB). Provided the lead requirements and acquisition for Office of the Chief Naval Operations (OPNAV). Coordinated/led Navy role in Defense Planning Guidance (DPG), Program Decision
Memoranda (PDM), Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR), and Defense Science Board (DSB) studies. Participated in Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD) and Joint Staff analysis assessment and provided
structure for coordination across the Navy. Coordinated and supported Joint Analytical Model Improvement Program (JAMIP).
FY09 Plans:
Continue all efforts of FY08.
FY10 Plans:
Continue all efforts of FY09.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
19 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
2221 Assessment Program
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
World Class Modeling, Simulation, and Capability Analysis
FY 08
FY 09
FY 10
9.212
9.456
9.430
FY 08 Accomplishments:
Provided the Navy with concise and innovative Modeling and Simulation (M&S) analyses and assessment to help optimize Navy Programs and investment decisions. Supported next generation research that emphasizes combat
modeling, simulation, war gaming, and analysis in support of strategic, operational, and resource decision making and emphasizes the development of pricing performance models that relate investments and manpower to output
performance and readiness. Evaluated new models that are able to capture Command, Control, Communication, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance & Reconnaissance (C4ISR) interaction with sea based forces, and the
challenges of new form of threat including terrorist, disruptive, and catastrophic. Supported Fleet readiness and logistics M&S. Conducted Verification, Validation, and Accreditation (VV&A) of select Navy models. Improved the ability
to model emerging security challenges and operations concepts (Irregular, Catastrophic, Disruptive challenges). Developed optimization models that work across multiple warfare areas. Improved the traceability of data through the
modeling hierarchy. Refined the linkages between cost and mission performance in performance-modeled acquisition programs. Conducted Joint mission warfare M&S in the Sea Strike, FORCEnet Sea Shield, and Sea Basing
mission areas. Conducted mission level warfare M&S of Joint Capability Areas.
FY09 Plans:
Continue all efforts of FY08.
FY10 Plans:
Continue all efforts of FY09.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
20 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
2221 Joint Mission Assessment Studies
BA-6
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Joint Mission Assessment Studies
FY 2008
0.000
FY 2009
0.000
FY 2010
3.154
Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA) – The CBA is the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System analysis process that includes three phases: the Functional Area Analysis (FAA), the
Functional Needs Analysis (FNA), and the Functional Solution Analysis (FSA). The results of the CBA are used to develop a joint capabilities document (based on the FAA and FNA) or initial capabilities
document (based on the full analysis). CBA funding provides the Resource Sponsors the means to develop the analytic underpinning to support the determination of naval capabilities and force structure
recapitalization investments needed to fulfill the Maritime Strategy.
FY10 Plans:
CBA efforts are a tool designed to address emergent questions and analysis needs. CBA effort will improve the quality of Analysis of Alternatives (AOA's) generated, complement our warfare integration
task, and increase our ability to respond to questions received regarding the generation of requirements to address capability based assessments.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
21 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
2221 Assessment Program
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not Applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable.
E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:
Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC), McLean, VA, supports the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) assessment program, mission capability packages processes, and modeling and
simulation and analytically based warfare analyses that provides the basis for decision making with respect to alternative weapons systems; Concept of Operations (CONOPS) and force packages;
Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems, FORCEnet; warfare systems (Sea Strike, Sea Shield, and Sea Basing); integration
and force structure; and warfighting support.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
22 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
FY 2008
1.578
FY 2009
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
3025 MID-RANGE FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS
FY 2010
1.567
1.594
RDT&E Articles Qty
A.
AND
BUDGET
ITEMITEM
JUSTIFICATION:
A. MISSION
MISSIONDESCRIPTION
DESCRIPTION
AND
BUDGET
JUSTIFICATION:
One
priority
goals
is toisgain
a clean
and auditable
financialfinancial
statement.
The Office
Secretary
of Defense
(OSD)
Comptroller,
in his 8(OSD)
AugustComptroller,
2003 memorandum,
Military
One of
ofDoD’s
DoD’sand
andNavy’s
Navy’s
priority
goals
to gain
a clean
and auditable
statement
by of
FYthe
2007.
The Office
of the
Secretary
of Defense
in his 8directed
August the
2003
Departments
anddirected
Defensethe
Agencies,
coordination with
DefenseAgencies,
Finance and
Accounting Service
(DFAS),
to prepare
a comprehensive
mid-range
to identify measurable
steps
to ensure
memorandum,
MilitaryinDepartments
andthe
Defense
in coordination
with the
Defense
Finance
and Accounting
Servicefinancial
(DFAS),improvement
to prepare plan
a comprehensive
mid-range
financial
each
material line
is to
auditable,
ensure all steps
major to
deficiencies
are resolved.
improvement
plan
identifyand
measurable
ensure each
material line is auditable, and ensure all major deficiencies are resolved.
This project supports the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy (RDT&E,N) and Office of Naval Research (ONR) portion of the larger DoD and Navy-wide effort to implement the Financial Improvement
This project supports the Research, Development, Test and Evaluation, Navy (RDT&E,N) and Office of Naval Research (ONR) portion of the larger DoD and Navy-wide effort to implement the
Plan (FIP). Corrective actions required to resolve known deficiencies and determine resource requirements (people and systems) are being identified.
Financial Improvement Plan (FIP). Corrective actions required to resolve known deficiencies and determine resource requirements (people and systems) are being identified. Funding beyond FY
2007 is for the
sustainment of the clean and auditable statement for RDT&E,N.
Performance
Metrics:
Financial records must become compliant in accordance with the Chief Financial Officers Act.
Performance Metrics:
Financial records must become compliant in accordance with the Chief Financial Officers Act.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
23 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
3025 MID-RANGE FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS
BA-6
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
Financial Improvements
FY 08
1.578
FY 09
1.567
FY 10
1.594
FY08 Accomplishments:
- Posted obligations within the reporting period in which they were incurred.
- Expanded the practice of having major contracting activities post awards electronically to the Standard Accounting and Reporting System (STARS).
- Performed obligation validations to ensure that posted obligations were accurate.
- Revised the accounts receivable process to more accurately record collections.
- Monitored duplication in vendor pay accounting system and STARS one pay, as invoices were settled.
- Eliminated problem disbursements older than 120 days, narrowing to 60 days, and potentially narrowing even further.
- Discovered and started correction phase for the Financial Improvement Program (FIP).
- Updated of Wide Area Workflow (WAWF) in order to allow Grants and Intergovernmental Personnel Agreements (IPA) invoices to be processed using WAWF.
- Continued the A-123 process for the Office of Naval Research (ONR). Appendix A of the Office of Management and Budget Circular No. A-123 requires that Federal agencies take responsibility for conducting a
rigorous assessment of internal controls over financial reporting.
- Completed validation packages containing financial business processes for the Naval Research Laboratory (NRL).
FY09 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY 08 less those noted as completed above.
FY10 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
24 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
3025 MID-RANGE FINANCIAL IMPROVEMENT PLANS
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Navy Related RDT&E:
PE 0605013N (Information Technology Development)
PE 0605861N (RDT&E Science and Technology Management)
Non-Navy Related RDT&E:
Not Applicable
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable
E. MAJOR PERFORMERS
No performer in this PE received more than 15% or $10 million of the program.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
25 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
3039 CHENG
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
16.647
18.307
18.907
RDT&E Articles Qty
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
Project 3039 funds
funds the
the Assistant
Assistant Secretary
Secretary of
of the
theNavy
Navy(ASN)
(ASN)for
forResearch,
Research,Development
Developmentand
andAcquisition
Acquisition(RD&A),
(RD&A),ASN
ASN
RD&A
RD&A
Chief
Chief
Engineer
Engineer
(RDA
(RDA
CHENG)
CHENG)
to develop
to develop
andand
implement
implement
architecture-based
architecture-based
systems
systems
engineering processes,
engineering
methods
andprocesses,
tools that assure
methods
integrated
and tools
andthat
interoperable
assure integrated
systems are
anddelivered
interoperable
to thesystems
fleet. This
areproject
delivered
provides
to the
thefleet.
mission-oriented
This projecttechnical
providesbasis
the mission-oriented
for implementing technical
capability-based
basis for
acquisition
implementing
management
capability-based
within the Department of Nav
acquisition
management
within
the
Department
of Navy
(DoN)
to engineer
andsystems,
field Navy
Marine Corps
combat
systems, weapon
systems,
and command,
communications,
computers
and intelligence
(C4I)or system-of-systems
(DoN)
to engineer
and field
Navy
and
Marine Corps
combat
systems,
weapon
andand
command,
control,
communications,
computers
and intelligence
(C4I)control,
programs
that must operate
as family-of-systems
(FoS)
programs
that
must
as family-of-systems
(FoS)
or system-of-systems
(SoS).
The focus
of this systems
project isaton
identifying
functions,
and connections
between
at boththree
the force
and unit level
(SoS).
The
focus
of operate
this project
is on identifying the
functions,
relationships, and
connections
between
both
the forcethe
and
unit levelrelationships,
and across warfare
mission areas,
andsystems
encompasses
key elements:
Systems Engineering to
and across
mission
areas,engineering
and encompasses
three
key elements:
Systems
Engineering
to provide
the framework
for making
engineering
decisionsdecision-making
by warfighting capability
at the
level and
supports
provide
the warfare
framework
for making
decisions
by warfighting
capability
at the
FoS/SoS level
and supports
consistent
engineering
and investment
across Navy
andFoS/SoS
Marine Corps
programs
within capability-based
consistent portfolios.
engineeringNaval
and Collaborative
investment decision-making
across Navy
and Marine
programsaswithin
capability-based
acquisition
portfolios.
Naval
development
acquisition
Engineering Environment
development
and Corps
implementation
a DON
enterprise resource
for Naval
integration
and Collaborative
interoperabilityEngineering
information Environment
to enable collaboration
and and
decision support among
implementation
as a Program
DON enterprise
resource
Naval integration
interoperability
information
to enable collaboration
and decision
support
among Fleetorganizations.
organizations,Standards,
Program Executive
Offices,
Program
Managers,and technical staff to
Fleet
organizations,
Executive
Offices,forProgram
Managers,and
Systems
Commands,
prime contractors,
Resource/Warfare
Sponsors
and Comptroller
Policies and
Guidelines
engineering
Systems Commands,
and Comptroller
organizations.
Standards, Policies
and Guidelines engineering and technical staff to implement DoN, Office of the Secretary of
implement
DoN, Officeprime
of the contractors,
Secretary of Resource/Warfare
Defense (OSD) andSponsors
Joint integration
and interoperability
and Anti-Tamper
initiatives.
Defense (OSD) and Joint integration and interoperability and Anti-Tamper initiatives.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
26 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
3039 CHENG
BA-6
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Standards, Policy, and Guidelines
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
4.800
5.030
5.130
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Continued alignment of standards, policy, and guidelines across the Naval Enterprise and with OSD and Joint Service organizations. Continue data structure, process and collaborative engineering tools for
specified initiatives.
- Contiuned the integrated quick reference roadmap for acquisition programs on how the policies and programs fit together and provide a comprehensive summary of standards, policy, and guidelines, known issues,
processes and specific engineering products for Global Information Grid (GIG) Systems Engineering, Joint Theater Air and Missile Defense Office (JTAMDO), DOD Information Technology Standards Registry
(DISR), Information Support Plan (ISP) and Net Enabled Command Compatibility (NECC).
- Represented ASN RD&A in the OSD Systems Engineering Forums to address the impact of SOS engineering policy in acquisition.
- Completed Naval Power 21 Integration and Interoperability Management Plan development and Navy Standards Working Group Draft Standard Operating Procedure.
- Initiate ISP and NR-KPP implementation plans.
- Worked with the DOD Anti-Tamper Executive Agent on DON policy and Implementation. Select and evaluate anti-tamper technologies in designated areas of interest.
- Completed technical alignment of Naval Power 21 and OA standards with DISR standards and technical warrant holder roles and responsibilities for information technology standards.
FY09 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY08 less those noted as completed above.
- Continue work with DOD Institutional Reform & Governance Agent on DOD/DON policy and implementation.
- Develop Naval Power 21 and OA standards policy updates for alignment of Navy with DISR standards and technical warrant holder roles and responsibilities.
- Develop Naval Power 21 Integration and Interoperability Management Plan policy updates.
FY10 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
27 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
3039 CHENG
BA-6
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Naval Collaborative Engineering Environment (NCEE)
FY 2008
2.577
FY 2009
2.611
FY 2010
2.765
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Continued to develop and implement external interfaces to the Naval Collaborative Engineering Environment (NCEE) with authoritative DON data bases: continue Defense Architecture Repository System
(DARS) testing phase on technical data; continue Program Office interface; initiate Joint Forces Command database interface.
- Continued Interoperability Data Management and Analysis: update acquisition milestone document automation process and capabilities; complete deployment to programs of interest.
- Continued Integrated Engineering Environment support to Systems Engineering Integrated Product Teams (SE IPTs), Program Offices and Systems Commands: continue Naval Air Systems Command
(NAVAIRSYSCOM) Systems Engineering Resource Center (SERC) and Open Architecture (OA) Experiment Team technical support; initiate Naval Sea Systems Command
(NAVSEASYSCOM) programs technical support.
- Continued integrated engineering environment tool integration development: complete Visio and Bonapart plug ins; update CADM XML, System Architect, CORE and DOORS plug ins; initiate slate plug in.
- Continued to evolve the Decision Support Environment: deploy Naval Architecture Repository (NAR) prototype; complete Chief Engineer Architect Tool for Engineering Review (CHEATER) prototype;
continue to organize and transition enterprise-wide websites and workspaces.
FY09 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY 08.
FY10 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
28 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
3039 CHENG
BA-6
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Systems Engineering
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
9.270
10.666
11.012
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Continued to authenticate Naval Power 21 capabilities-based Integrated Architecture product assessments; develop the Naval Architecture Repository System (NARS) and technical views to support
decision-making.
- Continued Software Acquisition Process Improvement (Section 804) pilot project implementation.
- Completed System-of-Systems (SOS) Systems Engineering (SE) Guidebook Volumes I and II to address specialty engineering functions to include Human Systems Integration, Safety, etc.
- Continued SOS SE Integrated Product Team (IPTs) for Battlespace, Mine Warfare and Missile Defense Agency to support CNO priority capability needs.
- Continued acquisition milestone review documentation to assess Integration and Interoperability in Information Support Plans, Systems Engineering Plans and Risk Assessments and incorporate results in
the ASN Research, Development and Acquisition Dashboard.
- Continued NP 21 Integration and Interoperability Management Plan (I&IMP) implementation.
- Developed and promulgate integrated architecture roadmap with Mission Capability Package System View 8 and Capability Evolution Document.
- Completed mission and capability technical warrant holder roles and responsibilities.
FY09 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY08 less those noted as completed above.
- Implement Naval process for aligning and reusing ISP architecture information, approve Acquisition Category (ACAT) 1C and 2 ISP's, act as lead agency for review of ISPs received via Office of the
Secretary of Defense/Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (OSD/JCIDS).
- Review all Engineering Change Proposals which may impact systems across functional areas.
- Develop and disseminate Modeling and Simulation (M&S) executable modeling process for System of Systems.
FY10 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
- Complete System-of-Systems (SOS) Systems Engineering (SE) Guidebook Volumes I and II to address specialty engineering functions to include Human Systems Integration ,Safety, etc.
- Complete mission and capability technical warrant holder roles and responsibilities.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
29 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
3039 CHENG
BA-6
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Line Item No. & Name:
Not Applicable
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not Applicable
E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:
Alion Science and Technology Corporation, McLean VA - Primary professional and technical support services contract.
Naval Surface Warfare Center, Dahlgren, VA - Conduct Navy enterprise-wide open architecture experiment to identify metrics and enable component testing for interoperability.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
30 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
DATE:
May 2009
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605853N Management, Technical and International Support
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
3028 Operations Integration Group
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
0.000
0.000
4.436
RDT&E Articles Qty
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
Project 3039
fundsdetails
the Assistant
ofclassification.
the Navy (ASN) for Research, Development and Acquisition (RD&A), ASN RD&A Chief Engineer (RDA CHENG) to develop and implement architecture-based systems
Classified
program
are heldSecretary
at a higher
engineering processes, methods and tools that assure integrated and interoperable systems are delivered to the fleet. This project provides the mission-oriented technical basis for implementing capability-based
acquisition management within the Department of Navy (DoN) to engineer and field Navy and Marine Corps combat systems, weapon systems, and command, control, communications, computers and intelligence (C4I)
programs that must operate as family-of-systems (FoS) or system-of-systems (SoS). The focus of this project is on identifying the functions, relationships, and connections between systems at both the force and unit level
and across warfare mission areas, and encompasses three key elements: Systems Engineering to provide the framework for making engineering decisions by warfighting capability at the FoS/SoS level and supports
consistent engineering and investment decision-making across Navy and Marine Corps programs within capability-based acquisition portfolios. Naval Collaborative Engineering Environment development and
implementation as a DON enterprise resource for Naval integration and interoperability information to enable collaboration and decision support among Fleet organizations, Program Executive Offices, Program Managers,
Systems Commands, prime contractors, Resource/Warfare Sponsors and Comptroller organizations. Standards, Policies and Guidelines engineering and technical staff to implement DoN, Office of the Secretary of
Defense (OSD) and Joint integration and interoperability and Anti-Tamper initiatives.
R-2a RDTEN Project Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 144
31 of 31
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605856N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
Project
Number
& Title
FY 2008
Actual
FY 2009
Estimate
FY 2010
Estimate
Total
PE
3.359
3.585
3.633
0128 MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL STRATEGIC
SUPPORT
1.279
1.336
1.357
1038 ACOUSTIC AND NONACOUSTIC ANALYSIS
SUPPORT
2.080
2.249
2.276
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program element supports technical studies and
analyses as directed by the Director for Submarine Warfare to support major policy and procurement decisions.
This program is divided into two elements to support decision making in the areas of submarine and
antisubmarine warfare and undersea surveillance.
R1 Line Item 145
Page 1 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605856N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
President's Budget 2009
Congressional Program Reductions
Program Adjustments
Rate/Misc Adjustments
SBIR/STTR Transfer
President's Budget 2010
FY 2008
3.382
0.000
0.000
0.000
-0.023
3.359
FY 2009
3.597
-0.011
0.000
-0.001
0.000
3.585
FY 2010
3.688
0.000
-0.053
-0.002
0.000
3.633
PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Technical: Not applicable.
Schedule: Not applicable.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
E. PERFORMANCE METRICS:
This program element supports studies in the area of undersea surveillance missions, sensor system, payloads,
force employment, communications, acoustic performance prediction systems, environmental and medical effects
of acoustics systems including installations/removals, operational security and future threat analysis.
Program success is measured through analytical results and constant interaction with the contractors that
enable the Director for Submarine Warfare to make decisions effectively. In addition, it provides research
and reports necessary to support Surveillance Towed Array Sonar Systems (SURTASS) Low Frequency Active (LFA)
sonar compliance with Federal, State and Local environmental laws required for continued SURTASS LFA
operations, analysis of undersea technology for application for future undersea surveillance capabilities, and
assessment of current and future Integrated Undersea Surveillance System (IUSS) warfare areas and potential
allied Navy contributions. To this goal, research is conducted by educational and research institutions
R1 Line Item 145
Page 2 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605856N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT
renown for their expertise in the area, and by marine mammal biologists with extensive background in specific
areas of underwater acoustics. This approach is deemed the most cost effective and efficient course of action
for the Navy.
R1 Line Item 145
Page 3 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605856N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0128
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT
PROJECT TITLE: MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL STRATEGIC SUPPORT
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
Project FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
Number
Actual
Estimate Estimate
& Title
0128 MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL
STRATEGIC SUPPORT
1.279
1.336
1.357
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides analytical support to the
Director, Submarine Warfare Division as a basis for major policy, planning and acquisition program decisions.
It supports the development of the Submarine Force strategic vision to guide research and development
investment strategy and future planning. Additionally, this line supports studies in the area of submarine
and undersea surveillance missions, force structure, payloads and sensors and force employment.
B.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT, STRATEGIC
FY 2008
1.279
FY 2009
1.336
FY 2010
1.357
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Continued to examine specific applications for submarine mine countermeasures and develop a strategy for
ensuring submarine access to contested areas of the world.
- Continued to assess the strategic deterrence (conventional and nuclear) force structure, security, and
capability in the Navy.
- Continued to perform an in-depth review of undersea warfare research and development requirements, past and
present, and propose an investment strategy to maximize future capabilities.
- Continued to assess implications of current and developing technologies on undersea warfare in both near and
far term systems and develop strategic concepts to guide future acquisitions through partnership with the
Naval Postgraduate School.
R1 Line Item 145
Page 4 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605856N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0128
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT
PROJECT TITLE: MANAGEMENT AND TECHNICAL STRATEGIC SUPPORT
- Continued to assess the submarine forces capabilities in view of emerging technologies and changes in joint
and naval strategies. This will be used to develop capability based ideas and concepts to guide research and
development and science and technology efforts.
- Continued reviews of various submarine operations to assess the safety and security of the ships and
missions assigned to identify the problems that require further analysis and study.
FY 2009 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY08.
FY 2010 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NON-NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R1 Line Item 145
Page 5 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605856N
PROJECT NUMBER: 1038
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT
PROJECT TITLE: ACOUSTIC AND NONACOUSTIC ANALYSIS SUPPORT
Project FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
Number
Actual
Estimate Estimate
& Title
1038 ACOUSTIC AND NONACOUSTIC
ANALYSIS SUPPORT
2.080
2.249
2.276
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides analytical support to the
Director, Submarine Warfare Division and the IUSS Branch Head as a basis for major policy, planning, and
acquisition program decisions. It supports studies in the area of undersea surveillance missions, sensor
system, communications, acoustic performance prediction systems, environmental and medical effects of acoustic
systems including installations/removals, operational security, and future threat analysis. Supports
synthetic mission lay down simulations for IUSS strategic planning and resource allocation. Continues
development/documentation of architecture for future undersea surveillance capabilities. Supports studies to
determine long-term impact of IUSS active sensors on marine animals and development of SURTASS, LFA, and the
Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).
B.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
ACOUSTIC AND NON-ACOUSTIC ANALYSIS SUPPORT
FY 2008
2.080
FY 2009
2.249
FY 2010
2.276
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Continued environmental compliance requirements and actions pertinent to Compact Low Frequency Active (CLFA)
at-sea testing, training and operations.
- Continued the SURTASS Engineering Measurements Program (SURTASS EMP) to provide for post-mission engineering
analysis of SURTASS acoustic data.
- Continued environmental compliance support for issuance of annual LOA under the MMPA and required quarterly
reporting for SURTASS LFA vessels.
- Continued analyses to estimate the long-term effects of SURTASS LFA on marine mammals.
- Continued monitoring of undersea technology for application for future undersea surveillance capabilities.
- Continued assessment of current and future IUSS warfare areas and potential allied Navy contributions.
R1 Line Item 145
Page 6 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605856N
PROJECT NUMBER: 1038
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: STRATEGIC TECHNICAL SUPPORT
PROJECT TITLE: ACOUSTIC AND NONACOUSTIC ANALYSIS SUPPORT
- Completed planning and execution of the Phase II of deep diving odontocete behavioral response study
research strategy and continued the marine animal behavioral response studies and research; in concert with
ONR, oil industry, and U.K. support.
FY 2009 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY08, less those noted as complete above.
FY 2010 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NON-NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R1 Line Item 145
Page 7 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605861N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
Project
Number
& Title
FY 2008
Actual
FY 2009
Estimate
FY 2010
Estimate
Total
PE
68.212
69.724
70.942
0135 ONR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
64.823
66.350
67.487
2353 R&D DFAS BILLINGS
3.389
3.374
3.455
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program element (PE) covers Office of Naval
Research (ONR) corporate expenses including salaries, utilities, printing, supplies, materials, Information
Technology (IT), general support equipment and other day-to-day logistical costs. The vast majority of these
items represent fixed costs associated with Scientists and Engineers supporting the Navy’s Science and
Technology (S&T) Programs.
The Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS) Billings project (2353) funds accounting services provided
to ONR and Navy Research and Development (R&D) activities.
R1 Line Item 146
Page 1 of 5
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605861N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
President's Budget 2009
Congressional Program Reductions
Program Adjustments
Rate/Misc Adjustments
Total Reprogrammings
President's Budget 2010
FY 2008
67.747
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.465
68.212
FY 2009
69.913
-0.189
0.000
0.000
0.000
69.724
FY 2010
71.311
0.000
0.205
-0.574
0.000
70.942
PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Technical:
Schedule: Not applicable.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
E. PERFORMANCE METRICS:
This PE funds operating costs for ONR's mission. Program performance is measured by attaining financial
benchmarks for planned obligations vs. actual obligations and planned expenditures vs. actual expenditures.
R1 Line Item 146
Page 2 of 5
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605861N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0135
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
PROJECT TITLE: ONR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
Project FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
Number
Actual
Estimate Estimate
& Title
0135 ONR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
MANAGEMENT
64.823
66.350
67.487
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project supports ONR leadership, management and
direction for the Naval S&T program. This project funds ONR Corporate salaries, utilities, supplies, and
other fixed costs at ONR Headquarters and field offices. ONR sponsors scientific advances, which lead to
Future Naval Capabilities (FNC's), supporting the Fleet’s ability to operate from a position of technological
superiority. Functions performed include (1) scientific and technical direction of the nationwide 6.1 basic
research program with colleges, universities, non-profit organizations and Naval Laboratories and Warfare
Centers; (2) scientific and technical direction of the 6.2 applied research program through the Naval R&D
laboratories and Warfare Centers and industry; (3) scientific and technical direction of the Naval 6.3
advanced technology development program through the Navy’s R&D laboratories, Warfare Centers and industry; (4)
management, resource formulation, program assessment, and contract negotiation/administration of the Navy
basic research, applied research and advanced technology development program; and (5) coordination of the
Navy’s Technology Base program within the context of total DoD/Government (e.g., National Science Foundation,
National Academy of Sciences) R&D initiatives in order to maximize scientific advances. This project also
supports ONR management and direction for the following Navy-wide programs: Small Business Innovation
Research, Naval Research Advisory Committee, Navy Patent Program, Historically Black Colleges and
Universities/Minority Institutions Program, Navy Manufacturing Technology Program and the Ballistic Missile
Submarine Nuclear (SSBN) Security Technology Program. In addition, this project supports ONR’s Navy-wide
responsibilities in the negotiation and establishment of indirect cost rates for DoD-assigned universities and
performance of contract administration for all DoD contracts/grants at all colleges and universities.
B.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
S&T MANAGEMENT SUPPORT
FY 2008
64.823
R1 Line Item 146
Page 3 of 5
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2009
66.350
FY 2010
67.487
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605861N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0135
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
PROJECT TITLE: ONR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
This project provides for all basic costs and support of ONR Headquarters and its field activities in support
of the entire Navy S&T program. Almost all the funds in this project are fixed costs, such as salaries, and
communications. Specifically, it pays the salaries of Scientific and Engineering and corporate business
personnel who direct the execution of the Navy’s basic research, applied research, and advanced technology
development programs at the nation’s universities/colleges, Navy laboratories, Warfare Centers, and private
industry.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NON-NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R1 Line Item 146
Page 4 of 5
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605861N
PROJECT NUMBER: 2353
Project FY 2008
FY 2009
Number
Actual
Estimate
& Title
2353 R&D DFAS BILLINGS
3.389
3.374
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: RDT&E SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT
PROJECT TITLE: R&D DFAS BILLINGS
FY 2010
Estimate
3.455
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides funding for accounting services
provided to the Office of Naval Research and other Navy research and development activities by the Defense
Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS).
B.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
FY 2008
3.389
TRANSACTIONS PROCESSED IN SUPPORT OF DON R&D
FY 2009
3.374
FY 2010
3.455
This project funds the DFAS bill for transactions processed in support of Department of the Navy R&D
activities. Specific services include payroll, transportation, commercial invoices, travel, maintenance of
trial balances, associated accounting and reporting.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NON-NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R1 Line Item 146
Page 5 of 5
UNCLASSIFIED
Appropriation/Budget Activity
RDT&E,N BA 6
Cost ($ in millions)
Total PE Cost
Medical Force
Protection/3047
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E,N Budget Item Justification
Date: May 2009
R-1 Item Nomenclature:
RDT&E,N Instrumentation Modernization 0605862N
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
1.382
0.000
0.000
1.382
0.000
0.000
A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:
This program element includes RDT&E,N funds for force protection requirements, equipment, minor construction and other investment and materiel support costs not
directly chargeable to RDT&E,N projects. Excludes military manpower and related costs, non-RDT&E,N base operating costs, and military construction costs, which
are included in other appropriate programs. (Funding was transferred to CNIC beginning in FY 09).
B. Program Change Summary:
FY 2009 President's Budget Submission
FY 2010 President's Budget Submission
Total Adjustments
Program Adjustments:
Congressional Rescissions
Congressional Adjustments
SBIR/STTR/FTT Assessment
Program Adjustments
Rate/Miscellaneous Adjustments
Total Adjustments
FY 2008
1.393
1.382
-0.011
FY 2009
0.000
0.000
0.000
FY 2010
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
-0.011
0.000
0.000
-0.011
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
R-1 Line Item No. 147
Page 1 of 2
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E,N Project Justification
Appropriation/Budget Activity RDT&E,N
BA 6
Cost ($ in millions)
Medical Force Protection/3047
RDT&E,N Articles Quantity
Date: May 2009
RDT&E,N Instrumentation Modernization 0605862N
FY 2008
1.382
FY 2009
0.000
FY 2010
0.000
A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:
This program provides for protection of Navy Installations against terrorist activities by developing and deploying advanced technologies for force protection+A9 capabilities that are cost
effective. The Force Protection Ashore PE/Project provides for maintenance, operation and other support costs of laboratories, warfare centers, ranges and supporting activities engaged
in shore side force protection. Included is support for advanced test equipment, construction, data acquisition devices/ systems, and software at research activities and supporting
installations. The project will conduct studies and analysis of threat, vulnerability and technology (science, technology and systems) tradeoffs over the full range of force protection ashore
issues for the purpose of formulating optimum RDT&E investment strategies for the earliest attainment of anti-terrorism/force protection (ATFP) capabilities. Included are funds for force
protection requirements at our OCONUS medical research laboratories for the protection of military and civilian employees, facilities, and equipments. This is accomplished through a
planned and integrated application of antiterrorism measures, security equipment, facility site improvements and personnel protective services.
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Accomplishment/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E,N Articles Quantity
FY 2008
1.382
FY 2009
0.000
FY 2010
0.000
FY 2008 Accomplishments
The funds continue to provide for the on-going Force Protection Requirements at BUMED OCONUS Medical Research Laboratories. These recurring requirements include: Security
Specialist (required by RSO, Indonesia); Security Guards; Security Driver Training and Overtime; Maintenance of Non-Tactical Armored Vehicles; Perimeter Upgrades (barriers); Alarm
Systems; Perimeter Lighting; Personal Protective Equipment; Maintenance of Communications Systems/Equipment (radios, cell phones for emergency recall, satellite phones for
deployed personnel, and Closed Circuit TV equipment). Replaced Emergency Generator for critical systems NAMRU-3 Cairo. Additionally in FY08 a Safe Haven Study was funded and
conducted for NMRCD, Lima as a requirement by the RSO. The study culminated in a report that will generate design requirements for Safe Haven provisions in existing and planned
f iliti
C. Other Program Funding Summary: Not Applicable
D. Acquisition Strategy: Not Applicable
E. Performance Metrics: Not Applicable
R-1 Line Item No. 147
Page 2 of 2
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
DATE
May 2009
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
COST (In Millions)
Total PE Cost
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
0605863N/RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
178.651
194.034
0568 / A/C FLT Hours
34.670
34.098
32.629
0569 / A/C Support
41.913
45.234
35.850
2924 / SDTS
3186 / Air and Missile Defense Radar
3206 / T&E Enterprise
193.353
8.815
9.448
9.114
93.253
0.000
0.000
0.000
105.254
115.760
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION:
This continuing program provides support for ships and aircraft required to accommodate Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) of new systems. The RDT&E ship and
aircraft inventory is required to adequately test new and improved weapon systems, stay current with threats, and increase warfighting capability of the fleet. The program
provides integrated logistics support for aircraft at selected field activities; provides depot-level rework of aircraft, engines, and components for the Navy inventory of RDT&E
aircraft; and provides support for ships and aircraft bailed to contractors for Navy RDT&E projects. Costs covered under this element include aircrew training and proficiency,
fuel, supplies, equipment, repair, Aviation Depot Level Repairables (AVDLR), overhaul of ships and aircraft, as well as organizational, intermediate, and depot maintenance of
ships and aircraft in the Navy RDT&E inventory.
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
Funding:
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY09 President's Budget
178.651
195.017
201.110
FY10 President's Budget
178.651
194.034
193.353
0.000
-0.983
-7.757
Congressional Adjustments
0.000
-0.303
0.000
SBIR/STTR Transfer
0.000
0.000
0.000
Program adjustment
0.000
-0.680
-3.657
Total Adjustments
(U) Summary of Adjustments
Rate/Misc Adjustments
Total
0.000
0.000
-4.100
0.000
-0.983
-7.757
R-1 Line Item No 148
PAGE 1 of 12
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
COST (In Millions)
Project Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605863N/RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
FY 2008
FY 2009
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0568/A/C FLT Hours
FY 2010
34.670
34.098
32.629
0
0
0
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
RDT&E Aircraft Flight Hours. This non-acquisition project supports direct flight hour costs, including organizational and intermediate level maintenance, as well as
associated consumables, including petroleum, oil, and lubricants (POL). These flight hours are used for post-maintenance test flights, aircrew training, and the
accomplishment of pilot proficiency requirements (approximately 3 hours per pilot per month), in support of Research and Development programs at four Naval Air Systems
Command/Naval Surface Warfare Center/Office of Naval Research (NAVAIR/NSWC/ONR) flight activities.
R-1 Line Item No 148
PAGE 2 of 12
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605863N/RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0568/A/C FLT Hours
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
FY 2008
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
FY 2009
34.670
FY 2010
34.098
RDT&E Articles Quantity
0
0
Providing organizational and intermediate-level maintenance, supply and Petroleum, Oil and Lubricants (POL) in support of RDT&E aircraft operations.
36.850
0
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not Applicable
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable
E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:
NAWCAD Patuxent River, MD: In support of direct flight hours for R&D programs at NAWCAD.
NAWCWD Point Mugu, CA: In support of direct flight hour costs for R&D programs at NAWCWD.
R-1 Line Item No 148
PAGE 3 of 12
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
COST (In Millions)
Project Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605863N/RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
FY 2008
FY 2009
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0569/A/C Support
FY 2010
41.913
45.234
35.850
0
0
0
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
RDT&E Aircraft Support. This continuing project funds costs associated with Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) fixed and rotary wing aircraft which
accommodate test and evaluation of aircraft/weapon systems. Testing aboard these platforms reduces the number of fleet units required to support RDT&E efforts. Included in
these costs are Aviation Depot-Level Repairables (AVDLRs), which are spare and replacement aircraft parts and components to support overhead maintenance related flight
operations, aircrew training, and proficiency flight hours. This project also funds airframe Standard Depot Level Maintenance (SDLM), the Integrated Maintenance Concept
(IMC) and Phased Depot Maintenance (PDM), in-service repairs, emergency repairs, and engine repairs, as well as aircraft material condition and field inspections.
Additionally, it funds Individual Material Readiness List (IMRL) tools and support equipment, and other systems for application to and compatibility with RDT&E requirements.
R-1 Line Item No 148
PAGE 4 of 12
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605863N/RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0569/A/C Support
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
FY 2008
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
FY 2009
40.531
FY 2010
43.548
34.220
RDT&E Articles Quantity
0
0
0
Continuing the transition from ASPA/SDLM/MCAPP to the IMC/PDM program for depot maintenance requirements, while sustaining the following programs: AVDLR/IMRL, engine
repairs, support of aircraft in the RDT&E inventory. Continuing operation and implementation of maintenance and material management programs at Naval Air Warfare Center
activities.
FY 2008
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
FY 2009
1.382
RDT&E Articles Quantity
0
Providing In-Service Repair (ISR) funds for emergent repair requirements to aircraft performing mission critical test and evaluation projects.
FY 2010
1.686
1.630
0
0
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not Applicable
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable
E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:
NAWCAD Patuxent River, MD: Support of aircraft for RDT&E inventory; AVDLR/IMRL support; Operation and implementation of maintenance and material management programs.
NAWCWD Point Mugu, CA: Support of aircraft for RDT&E inventory; AVDLR/IMRL support; Operation and implementation of maintenance and material management programs.
NADEP Jacksonville, FL: Provide aircraft depot maintenance and engine repairs for RDT&E aircraft, and in-service repairs.
NADEP North Island, CA: Provide aircraft depot maintenance for RDT&E aircraft, and in-service repairs.
Hill Air Force Base Hill AFB, UT: Provide aircraft depot maintenance for RDT&E aircraft.
R-1 Line Item No 148
PAGE 5 of 12
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
COST (In Millions)
Project Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605863N/RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
FY 2008
FY 2009
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
2924/SDTS
FY 2010
8.815
9.448
9.114
0
0
0
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
This project provides for the maintenance of Hull Mechanical and Electrical (HM&E) and installed Combat Systems of the Self-Defense Test Ship (SDTS) in support of the Navy
Research, Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) of ship self-defense systems. Testing aboard this ship reduces the number of fleet units required to support RDT&E efforts.
SDTS provides the capability to safely test self-defense weapon systems within their minimum range. A major cost of this project is regularly scheduled ship, combat system
and remote control maintenance. The remainder of the funds are used for purchase of expendable supplies and routine equipment, fuel and petroleum products, repairs and
supporting services. Most costs are fixed and are associated with simply having this platform in the inventory.
R-1 Line Item No 148
PAGE 6 of 12
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605863N/RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
2924/SDTS
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
FY 2008
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
FY 2009
8.815
FY 2010
9.448
9.114
RDT&E Articles Quantity
0
0
2008: SDTS priority consisted of installing multiple configurations, deinstalling unused equipment, modifying top side and below deck equipment to coincide with appropriate
0
elements and Combat Systems, testing of all systems listed in the Air Warfare Ship Self Defense T&E Enterprise TEMP, and executing according to the Enterprise TEMP. SDTS
began the planning, scheduling, and performing of maintenance onboard EDD 964 for HM&E, CS and remote control elements in support of such activities.
2009: NAVSURFWARCENDIV Port Hueneme, CA will plan, schedule, and perform recurring maintenance onboard EDD 964 and continue to support installation of Enterprise Equipment
for multiple ship classes (LHDs/CVNs,DDG 1000, and LCS) PHD will also determine the feasibility of multiple configurations in support of the Navy AAW SSD Enterprise Strategy.
2010: Continue efforts from 2009
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not Applicable
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
This line of accounting is for recurring combat system and ship maintenance.
E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:
NSWC PHD
Northrop Grumman
ATI
R-1 Line Item No 148
PAGE 7 of 12
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
COST (In Millions)
Project Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605863N/RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
FY 2008
FY 2009
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
3186/Air and Missile Defense Radar
FY 2010
93.253
0.000
0.000
0
0
0
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
The T&E Enterprise consolidates all Air Warfare (AW) Ship Self Defense (SSD) at-sea testing to across multiple class ships, beginning with CVN 74, LHD 8, LPD17, LHA 6, DDG
1000, CVN 78, and 2 versions of Littoral Combat Ship (LCS). This consolidated AW SSD test and evaluation approach meets the Probability of Raid Annihilation (PRA) (PRA is
defined as a required surface ship defense against Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles), Self Defense Test Ship (SDTS), and lead/operational ship testing requirements for ESSM TEMP
1471, RAM Blk 2 TEMP 286-1, DDG 1000 TEMP 1560, CVN 78 TEMP 1610, CEC TEMP 1415, SSDS TEMP 1400, LHA 6 TEMP 1697, AN/SPQ-9B TEMP 1463, SEWIP TEMP 1658 (Block 1A),
TEMP 0686, and the LCS TEMP 1695.
LHA 6 acquisition, installation and testing supports all big deck Amphibs and Carriers in the OA configuration as well RAM BLK 2 OPEVAL, SSDS OA with RAM BLK 2, SEWIP and ESSM.
The T&E Enterprise merges common ship, element, and system requirements into the least number of test events while leveraging planned Combat System Ship Qualification Trials
(CSSQTs) to accomplish Developmental Testing (DT) and Operational Testing (OT) requirements. All tests on the SDTS require the sharing of infrastructure, missile range
allocations, execution time and underway time to eliminate duplicative testing. T&E Enterprise preserves "end-to-end" mission Operational Testing in a realistic operational
environment, capitalizing on Probability of Raid Annihilation M&S data validated with results of that Operational Testing, and ensuring a consistent approach across ship
classes. Applicability of all test events are beneficial across multiple ship classes with the same variation under test.
The T&E Enterprise acquires equipment (FY08-10) for installation onboard the SDTS (FY10), conducts test and evaluation on the SDTS and lead/operational ships (FY08-FY10)
and satisfies the Probability of Raid Annihilation (PRA) Testbed Model Development and test execution requirements (FY08-FY10).
FY09 and out funding is in PE 0605863N under PU 3206.
R-1 Line Item No 148
PAGE 8 of 12
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605863N/RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
3186/Air and Missile Defense Radar
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
FY 2008
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
FY 2009
93.253
FY 2010
0.000
0.000
RDT&E Articles Quantity
0
0
2008: This effort initiated Enterprise Acquisition of the LCS SEARAM, and DDG 1000 single MFR array. Efforts focused on the establishment of system engineering planning,
0
components development, Verification and Validation (V&V) Virtual Range Updates, Extensions, Integration and Testbed Verification, Validation and Accreditation (VV&A), and reporting.
Developed/implemented/executed Enterprise Test and Evaluation matrix.
Test and Evaluation includes all range services, use of the SDTS, aircraft, missiles, threats, target and target build up, planning and execution of test event in conjunction
with other Enterprise test events and Navy CSSQT's.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
LHA 6, CVN 78, DDG 1000, LCS
RAM BLK 2, ESSM, SPQ 9B, SSDS, SEARAM
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
DDG 1000 single MFR array, DDG 1000 Mk 41/57 hybrid, and DDG 1000 TSCE through Raytheon.
LCS SEARAM through PEO IWS 3.0 to Raytheon.
The acquisition strategy allows for Enterprise equipment to be developed/built, delivered and installed on the Self Defense Test Ship in time to support FY 2010 testing.
E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:
NSWC PHD
NSWC Point Mugu
NAWC China Lake
Northrop Grumman
NSWC Corona
Department of Interior
NAWCAD Pax River
Raytheon
Applied Physics Lab
PMS 500 and PMS 501
NRL
R-1 Line Item No 148
PAGE 9 of 12
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
COST (In Millions)
Project Cost
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605863N/RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
0.000
105.254
115.760
0
0
0
RDT&E Articles Qty
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
3206/T&E Enterprise
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
The T&E Enterprise consolidates all Air Warfare (AW) Ship Self Defense (SSD) at-sea testing across multiple class ships, beginning with CVN 74, LHD 8, LPD17, LHA 6, DDG
1000, CVN 78, and 2 versions of Littoral Combat Ship (LCS). This consolidated AW SSD test and evaluation approach meets the Probability of Raid Annihilation (PRA) (PRA is
defined as a required surface ship defense against Anti-Ship Cruise Missiles), Self Defense Test Ship (SDTS), and lead/operational ship testing requirements for ESSM TEMP
1471, RAM Blk 2 TEMP 286-1, DDG 1000 TEMP 1560, CVN 78 TEMP 1610, CEC TEMP 1415, SSDS TEMP 1400, LHA 6 TEMP 1697, AN/SPQ-9B TEMP 1463, SEWIP TEMP 1658 (Block 1A),
0686, and the LCS TEMP 1695.
LHA 6 acquisition, installation and testing supports all big deck Amphibs and Carriers in the OA configuration as well RAM BLK 2 OPEVAL, SSDS OA with RAM BLK 2, SEWIP and ESSM.
The T&E Enterprise merges common ship, element, and system requirements into the least number of test events while leveraging planned Combat System Ship Qualification Trials
(CSSQTs) to accomplish Developmental Testing (DT) and Operational Testing (OT) requirements. All tests on the SDTS require the sharing of infrastructure, missile range
allocations, execution time and underway time to eliminate duplicative testing.
T&E Enterprise preserves "end-to-end" mission Operational Testing in a realistic operational environment, capitalizing on Probability of Raid Annihilation M&S data validated
with results of that Operational Testing, and ensuring a consistent approach across ship classes. Applicability of all test events are beneficial across multiple ship classes
with the same variation under test.
The T&E Enterprise acquires equipment (FY08-10) for installation onboard the SDTS (FY10), conducts test and evaluation on the SDTS and lead/operational ships (FY08-FY10)
and satisfies the Probability of Raid Annihilation (PRA) Testbed Model Development and test execution requirements (FY08-FY10).
FY08 funding is in PE 0605863N under PU 3186.
R-1 Line Item No 148
PAGE 10 of 12
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605863N/RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
3206/T&E Enterprise
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
FY 2008
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
FY 2009
0.000
FY 2010
105.254
115.760
RDT&E Articles Quantity
0
0
0
2009: This effort continues acquisition of Enterprise equipment. DDG 1000 Mk 41/57 hybrid, and DDG 1000 TSCE. SSDS MK2 Mod 3b, SPS-48 E, CEC P3I, Mk 53 DLS & NULKA Mod 3,
SEWIP SLQ 32 B (V2), LCS Electro-Optic Directors, LCS CS Modules, LCS EW Suites, LCS 57 Bofors Gun Mount, Enterprise Interfaces/Remote Control System/Mods. Establishing
System Engineering planning, components development, Verification &Validation (V&V) Virtual Range Updates, extensions, Integration and Testbed Verification, Validation and Accreditations
(VV&A). Reporting execution strategies for Probability of Raid Annihilation Testbed development and test execution, and Lead and Operational Ship test and evaluation.
Develop/implement/execute Test and Evaluation matrix. Execute testing and evaluation for LPD 17, CVN 74 and SDTS.
2010: The primary focus of 2010 for T&E Enterprise is installation of all previously ordered/delivered Enterprise equipment onto the Self Defense Test Ship. Installation
services have been combined into a single window in 2010 to reduce the duplication of multiple staging services (scaffolding, rigging, cabling, power generation,
integration, etc.) PRA Testbed development, virtual range updates, and systems engineering will continue in support of LCS, LHA 6 and developed architecture will be
documented for future support to CVN 78. Implementation and execution of Enterprise test events will continue to effectively leverage resources and support changes in ship
delivery schedules.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
LHA 6, CVN 78, DDG 1000, LCS
RAM BLK 2, ESSM, SPQ 9B, SSDS, SEARAM
DDG Mod and CG MOD
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Acquisition of test equipment assets for Enterprise Ship Classes.
Acquisition of LHA 6 test equipment assets begins in FY09 and continues in FY10.
Acquisition of systems is tailored to each ship class, however applicable and beneficial across multiple ship classes with the same variation being testing.
DDG 1000 test equipment assets will be acquired through a direct contract.
LHA 6 components will be acquired through the applicable PEO MPM. LCS equipment will have some acquisition through the PMS 501 and direct on contract.
R-1 Line Item No 148
PAGE 11 of 12
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION (CONTINUATION)
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605863N/RDT&E SHIP AND AIRCRAFT SUPPORT
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
3206/T&E Enterprise
E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:
NSWC PHD
NSWC Point Mugu
NAWC China Lake
Northrop Grumman
NSWC Corona
Department of Interior
NAWCAD Pax River
Raytheon
Applied Physics Lab
PMS 500 and PMS 501
NRL
R-1 Line Item No 148
PAGE 12 of 12
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY /
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
BA-6
FY 2009
FY 2010
Total PE Cost
334.124
340.890
380.733
0541 AUTEC
53.646
55.082
56.195
3.679
3.826
4.087
0653 NAWC WEAPONS
142.711
145.823
150.710
0654 NAW AIRCRAFT
101.845
103.285
126.574
4.800
5.003
5.140
15.383
15.520
25.474
3029 T&E POLICY SUPPORT
0.671
0.691
0.758
3154 NANOOSE AND DABOB
11.389
11.660
11.795
0566 NAVAIR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPL
2921 PACIFIC MISSILE RANGE FACILITY
2922 MRTFB MAINT AND REPAIR
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program provides institutional maintenance and operations support for: the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Detachment Atlantic
Undersea Test and Evaluation Center (NAVUNSEAWARCEN DET AUTEC), Andros Island, Bahamas; the Environmental Compliance Program; Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division
(NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV), Point Mugu and China Lake, CA; Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAVAIRWARCENACDIV), Patuxent River, MD; T&E related capabilities at the Pacific Missile Range
Facility, Barking Sands, HI; Maintenance and Repair at NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV and NAVAIRWARCENACDIV; and the Naval Undersea Warfare Center Keyport (NAVUNSEAWARCENKEYPORT) Nanoose
and Dabob Bay Ranges. The Test and Evaluation (T&E) activities make up the Navy portion of the Department of Defense's Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB). These activities are chartered to
perform T&E for the development and acquisition of technology advanced weapons systems. Core T&E capabilities and capacity are operated to obtain weapons system performance documentation for
acquisition program milestone decisions to provide operational forces with effective weapons systems. This program provides Navy Acquisition Program Managers required test capabilities; lowers cost of T&E;
removes cost and scheduling impact of providing their own T&E resources; and retains the physical airspace, land space and sea space needed to conduct testing.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
Page 1 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY /
BA-6
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
Funding:
President's Budget 2009:
President's Budget 2010:
Total Adjustments
FY08
329.026
334.124
5.098
FY09
356.254
340.890
-15.364
FY10
356.930
380.733
23.803
Summary of Adjustments
Congressional Rescissions
Congressional Adjustments
SBIR/STTR/FTT Assessments
Program Adjustments
Rate/Misc Adjustments
Subtotal
-14.427
4.598
0.500
5.098
-0.937
-15.364
24.404
-0.601
23.803
Schedule:
Not Applicable.
Technical:
Not Applicable.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.
UNCLASSIFIED
149
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
Page 2 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
FY 2008
53.646
FY 2009
55.082
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0541, AUTEC
FY 2010
56.195
RDT&E Articles Qty "Not Applicable"
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: As a detachment of Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC), Division Newport, the mission of the Atlantic Undersea Test
and Evaluation Center (AUTEC) is to provide the US Navy an underwater range facility for full-spectrum test and evaluation of Undersea Warfare (USW) systems and for Fleet training and
readiness assessment.
The AUTEC Program Office is headquartered at Newport, RI. AUTEC's administrative offices are located at West Palm Beach, Florida. Test facilities are located at Andros Island, Sites 1
through 4, and the Berry Islands in the Bahamas. AUTEC aircraft make scheduled daily flights between West Palm Beach and Andros Town Airport.
AUTEC manages and, under service contract, maintains and operates a 500 square nautical miles deep-water and a 100 square nautical miles shallow-water acoustic tracking range; air-target
tracking capabilities; sonobuoy simulation systems; electronic warfare threat simulation systems; fixed and rotary wing aircraft; aircraft ground support facilities; acoustic targets; torpedo retrieval
and flushing capabilities; open-ocean range craft; marine support facilities; and, data processing and analysis capabilities.
Major test facilities on Andros Island are located at Site 1. The Command Control Building houses the range tracking displays and replay centers, the computer center, operations support
functions, communications center, and the central timing system. The Range Support Facility houses a torpedo post-run workshop, Mark 46 /Mark 50 lightweight torpedo Intermediate
Maintenance Activity (IMA), a Mark 30 undersea target IMA, a Mark 48 heavyweight torpedo R&D Turnaround facility and related technical facilities. The complex includes electrical and physical
calibration labs, a complete electronics maintenance shop, a dive locker, a precision machine shop, and logistics support areas.
AUTEC has a 285-foot concrete pier with a controlling depth of 17 feet (5.2 meters) at mean low tide. An adjacent wharf is approximately 240 feet in length (72 meters) with a controlling depth of
15 feet at mean low tide. Power is available at both locations. Facilities at the pier/marine area include fully equipped machine /fabrication and marine overhaul shops.
Also at Site 1, six Range User Buildings (RUBs) are maintained for assembling test equipment and equipment check-out during test mobilization or dockside periods. These staging areas are
equipped with a variety of power sources, gantry cranes, compressed air and security features. A fully equipped range user hanger for ground maintenance and storage of helicopters is located
at the AUTEC helicopter airstrip. Sites 2, 3, and 4 are small instrumented areas located south of Site 1 used to extend tracking of sonobuoys, communications, and air target track.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 3 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
0541, AUTEC
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Atlantic Undersea Test and Eval Ctr Facility
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
42.596
FY 09
44.032
FY 10
45.145
AUTEC is a Test and Evaluation (T&E) facility for collecting selected underwater, surface and air tracking data on test participants. This project funds the overhead/institutional costs required
to sustain the MRTFB capabilities at AUTEC in accordance with Department of Defense Directive 3200.11. Funds are used to maintain and operate mission essential/core test support
resources, instrumentation systems and marine craft required to meet customer test workload. Funds civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment, supplies, communication, equipment
maintenance, purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any costs necessary to manage and sustain MRTFB operations. Reimburses the Command for General and Administrative
support services.
Bahamian Lease
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
11.050
FY 09
11.050
FY 10
11.050
Provide rental payments to the Bahamian government for use of land and ocean in the Bahamas.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 4 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
0541, AUTEC
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Line Item No. & Name
Not Applicable.
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 5 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
FY 2008
3.679
FY 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0566, NAVAIR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
FY 2010
3.826
4.087
RDT&E Articles Qty "Not Applicable"
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This continuing project supports environmental compliance, conservation and pollution prevention related efforts at the Navy
Major Range and Test Facility Base (MRTFB) located at Patuxent River, MD, China Lake, CA, Point Mugu, CA, and Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center (AUTEC), Bahamas. The
Navy MRTFB environmental projects include ongoing efforts to comply with Federal, State, and local environmental requirements.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.
UNCLASSIFIED
149
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 6 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
0566, NAVAIR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Environmental Compliance
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
3.679
FY 09
3.826
FY 10
4.087
Continues hazardous waste disposal, solid waste disposal, natural and cultural resources programs, environmental permits, and environmental monitoring at AUTEC, Patuxent River,
China Lake and San Nicolas Island. Continue the removal and disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) contaminated items at China Lake. Continued comprehensive air pollution
meteorology studies at Point Mugu. Continue range contamination assessments at impact areas and lay down yards at China Lake.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 7 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Line Item No. & Name
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
0566, NAVAIR ENVIRONMENTAL COMPLIANCE
Not Applicable.
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.
UNCLASSIFIED
149
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 8 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
FY 2008
142.711
FY 2009
145.823
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0653, NAWC WEAPONS
FY 2010
150.710
RDT&E Articles Qty "Not Applicable"
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: Project provides continuing maintenance and operational support for the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division
(NAVAIRWARCENWPNDIV) Test and Evaluation (T&E) capabilities. These capabilities include the Pacific Ranges and Facilities, consisting of China Lake Ranges and the Point Mugu Sea Range, aerial
and surface targets, test instrumentation, and T&E aircraft. The Pacific Ranges use China Lake's 1.1 million acres of land and 17,000 square miles of military restricted (R-2508) airspace together with
Point Mugu's 125,000 square miles of instrumented sea range and 36,000 square miles of controlled overlying airspace, and airfield and test instrumentation at San Nicolas Island to perform its T&E
mission. Included in the China Lake ranges is the Electronic Combat Range (ECR), which provides outdoor free space development and operational testing of airborne electronic warfare (EW) systems
and tactics against shipboard and land based air defense systems. These ranges perform metric radar, multilateration and optical tracking of test objects; command, control, and destruct for range safety
purposes; communications; frequency interference control and analysis; collection processing and display of telemetered data; real-time data processing and display; and the operation of a sub scale
aerial target launch capability. Other test capabilities include an outdoor High Power Microwave (HPM) measurement facility; propulsion, warhead, environmental, rocket motor, and other missile
component test facilities; and gun ranges. This project funds costs that are not chargeable to customers.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 9 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
0653, NAWC WEAPONS
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Pacific Ranges
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
65.947
FY 09
63.333
FY 10
63.942
In accordance with (IAW) Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 3200.11., this project funds the overhead/institutional costs required to sustain the Major Range Test Facility Base
(MRTFB) capabilities at the Pacific Ranges and Facilities located at China Lake and Point Mugu CA. These facilities provide safe, instrumented, controlled open air testing utilizing the Land
Range, Sea Range, Electronic Combat Range, Air Vehicle Modification and Instrumentation, and San Nicholas Island. Funds are used to maintain and operate mission essential/core test
support resources. These resources include test article instrumentation and/or modification for Flight Test Aircraft, Weapons Under Test and Aircraft Engines Undergoing Un-installed test. as
well as, scheduling and control of air, land, sea and associated range operating areas required to meet customer test workload. Funds civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment
supplies, communication, equipment maintenance, purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any costs necessary to manage and sustain MRTFB operations.
Navy Test Wing Pacific
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
23.734
FY 09
24.899
FY 10
25.163
IAW with DoDD 3200.11., this project funds the overhead/institutional costs required to sustain the MRTFB capabilities of the Naval Test Wing Pacific located at China Lake and Point Mugu
CA. These facilities provide the Navy's principal Pacific test activity for Naval Aviation Systems Team aircraft, engaged in or supporting T&E of aircraft, weapons and weapons systems.
Funds are used to maintain and operate mission essential/core test support resources associated with aircraft and related systems and flight test safety required to meet customer test
workload. Funds civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment, supplies, communication, equipment maintenance, purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any costs necessary to
manage and sustain MRTFB operations.
Threat/Target Systems
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
11.368
FY 09
11.835
FY 10
11.964
This project funds the overhead/institutional costs required to sustain the MRTFB capabilities of the Threat/Target Systems facilities IAW DoDD 3200.11. These facilities provide the airborne
and seaborne threats for test and evaluation. Funds are used to maintain and operate mission essential/core test support resources associated with airborne and seaborne targets required
to meet customer test workload. Funds civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment, supplies, communication, equipment maintenance, purchased service contracts, annual utilities and
any costs necessary to manage and sustain MRTFB operations.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 10 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
0653, NAWC WEAPONS
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program (Cont.)
Test and Evaluation Ordnance
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
3.271
FY 09
3.300
FY 10
3.342
This project funds the overhead/institutional costs required to sustain the MRTFB capabilities of the Test and Evaluation Ordnance facilities IAW DoDD 3200.11. These facilities provide test
and evaluation of All-Up live ordnance and components. Funds are used to maintain and operate mission essential/core test support resources associated propulsion, warhead,
environmental, rocket motor, and other missile component test facilities required to meet customer test workload. Funds civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment, supplies,
communication, equipment maintenance, purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any costs necessary to manage and sustain MRTFB operations.
Staff
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
38.391
FY 09
42.456
FY 10
46.299
This project funds the overhead/institutional costs required to sustain the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division (NAWCWD) MRTFB Test and Evaluation capabilities IAW DoDD
3200.11. Reimburses the Command for General and Administrative Support services. Funds civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment, supplies, communication, equipment
maintenance, purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any costs necessary to manage and sustain MRTFB operations.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 11 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
0653, NAWC WEAPONS
BA-6
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Line Item No. & Name
Not Applicable.
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 12 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
FY 2008
101.845
FY 2009
103.285
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0654, NAWC AIRCRAFT
FY 2010
126.574
RDT&E Articles Qty "Not Applicable"
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides funds for the maintenance and operations of the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division's
(NAVAIRWARCENACDIV's) Major Range Test Facility Base (MRTFB) capabilities used to conduct test and evaluation for air platforms. NAVAIRWARCENACDIV has extensive airfield, flight
test ranges, aircraft systems test facilities and simulation laboratories to support aircraft Research Development Test and Evaluation (RDT&E). This includes 50,000 square miles of airspace,
39,375 square miles of sea space, and 7,950 acres of land space. Product areas include aircraft systems flight test and evaluation, carrier suitability certification, test article preparation, installed
system test and evaluation, and modeling and simulation support of the acquisition process. The Test and Evaluation (T&E) Group, Patuxent River, performs development and operational test
and evaluation of manned and unmanned air vehicle systems, including mission systems, equipment, subsystems, components, and support systems. This project also provides test and
evaluation facilities for air-breathing propulsion systems and extensive facilities for conducting both installed and uninstalled aircraft engine development and test and evaluation. This project
funds costs that are not chargeable to customers.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 13 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
0654, NAWC AIRCRAFT
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Atlantic Ranges
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
25.209
FY 09
23.957
FY 10
25.105
In accordance with (IAW) Department of Defense Directive (DoDD) 3200.11., this project funds the overhead/institutional costs required to sustain the MRTFB capabilities associated with the
Atlantic Ranges and Facilities and Air Vehicle Modification and Instrumentation . These facilities provide safe, instrumented, controlled flight testing and training in air, sea, and land arenas.
Funds are used to maintain and operate mission essential/core test support resources. These resources include test article instrumentation and/or modification for Flight Test Aircraft and
Weapons Under Test as well as, ground and flight test instrumentation systems, range instrumentation systems and data processing and communication systems required to meet customer
test workload. Funds civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment, supplies, communication, equipment maintenance, purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any costs
necessary to manage and sustain MRTFB operations.
Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E-Cubed)
and Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation
Facility (ACETEF)
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
21.439
FY 09
21.598
FY 10
21.469
In accordance with DoDD 3200.11., this project funds the overhead/institutional costs required to sustain the MRTFB capabilities associated with Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (ECubed) and Air Combat Environment Test and Evaluation Facility . These facilities provide T&E support with integrated, interactive, and repeatable synthetic environments and reduce the
risk and cost for programs with the use of installed systems tests to include simulation and stimulation tools, techniques and technologies. Funds are used to maintain and operate mission
essential/core test support resources required to meet customer test workload. Funds civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment, supplies, communication, equipment maintenance,
purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any costs necessary to manage and sustain MRTFB operations.
Propulsion Systems Test Facility
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
4.500
FY 09
4.545
FY 10
4.589
This project funds the overhead/institutional costs required to sustain the MRTFB capabilities of the Propulsion System Evaluation facility IAW DoDD 3200.11. These facilities perform T&E
of propulsion systems in the laboratories, engine test chambers and component test rigs of the Propulsion Systems Test Facility and the Aircraft T&E Facility. Propulsion Systems consists o
engines, engine components and accessories. Funds are used to maintain and operate mission essential/core test support resources required to meet customer test workload. Funds
civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment, supplies, communication, equipment maintenance, purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any costs necessary to manage and
sustain MRTFB operations.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 14 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
0654, NAWC AIRCRAFT
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program (Cont.)
Threat/Target Systems
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
1.802
FY 09
1.472
FY 10
1.954
This project funds the overhead/institutional costs required to sustain the MRTFB capabilities of the Threat/Target Systems facilities IAW DoDD 3200.11. These facilities provide the airborne
and seaborne threats for test and evaluation. Funds are used to maintain and operate mission essential/core test support resources associated with airborne and seaborne targets required to
meet customer test workload. Funds civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment, supplies, communication, equipment maintenance, purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any
costs necessary to manage and sustain MRTFB operations.
Naval Test Wing Atlantic
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
22.685
FY 09
23.638
FY 10
44.221
IAW with DoDD 3200.11., this project funds the overhead/institutional costs required to sustain the MRTFB capabilities of the Naval Test Wing Atlantic. These facilities provide support for
Naval Aviation Systems Team aircraft, engaged in or supporting T&E of aircraft and aircraft systems. Funds are used to maintain and operate mission essential/core test support resources
associated with aircraft and related systems and flight test safety required to meet customer test workload. Funds civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment, supplies, communication,
equipment maintenance, purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any costs necessary to manage and sustain MRTFB operations. FY10-11 budget increased to support additional
chase and tanker aircraft required to support F/A-18E/F/G and JSF.
Staff
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
26.210
FY 09
28.075
FY 10
29.236
This project funds the overhead/institutional costs required to sustain the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (NAWCAD) MRTFB Test and Evaluation capabilities IAW DoDD 3200.11.
Reimburses the Command for General and Administrative Support services. Funds civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment, supplies, communication, equipment maintenance,
purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any costs necessary to manage and sustain MRTFB operations.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 15 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
0654, NAWC AIRCRAFT
BA-6
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Line Item No. & Name
Not Applicable.
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 16 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
FY 2008
4.800
FY 2009
5.003
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
2921, PACIFIC MISSILE RANGE FACILITY
FY 2010
5.140
RDT&E Articles Qty "Not Applicable"
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program provides continuing maintenance and operations support for Test & Evaluation (T&E) related capabilities at the
Pacific Missile Range Facility (PMRF) located at Barking Sands on Kauai, HI. PMRF's T&E capabilities include precision radar and telemetry assets, the Mobile Aerial Target Support System
(MATSS), and optical tracking systems. These assets support Navy, DOD, and Army Missile Defense Test & Evaluation. This project funds costs not chargeable to customers.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 17 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
2921, PACIFIC MISSILE RANGE FACILITY
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
PMRF Test and Evaluation Assets
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
4.800
FY 09
5.003
FY 10
5.140
This project funds the overhead/institutional costs required to sustain the recognized Major Range Test Facility Base (MRTFB) capabilities at PMRF in accordance with Department of
Defense Directive 3200.11. Funds are used to maintain and operate mission essential/core test support resources including the precision radar and telemetry assets, the Mobile Aerial Targe
Support System (MATSS), the Stabilized High-accuracy Optical Tracking System (SHOTS), and the Telemetry Systems required to meet customer test workload. Funds civilian labor, travel,
transportation, equipment, supplies, communication, equipment maintenance, purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any costs necessary to manage and sustain MRTFB
operations. Reimburses the Command for General and Administrative support services.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 18 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
2921, PACIFIC MISSILE RANGE FACILITY
BA-6
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Line Item No. & Name
Not Applicable.
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 19 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
FY 2008
15.383
FY 2009
15.520
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
2922, MRTFB MAINT AND REPAIR
FY 2010
25.474
RDT&E Articles Qty "Not Applicable"
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides funding for the maintenance and repair of the Major Range Test Facility Base (MRTFB) Real Property
Maintenance Activities (RPMA) at the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division (W0653) and the Naval Air Warfare Center Aircraft Division (0654). Funds mission critical emergency services,
recurring maintenance and repair, and major repair projects. In addition it addresses priority items on the Backlog of Maintenance and Repair (BMAR) list.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 20 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
2922, MRTFB MAINT AND REPAIR
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Facility Maintenance and Repair
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
15.383
FY 09
15.520
FY 10
25.474
Support mission critical emergency services, recurring maintenance and repair, and minor and major repair efforts at the Naval Air Warfare Center Weapons Division, the Naval Air Warfare
Center Aircraft Division, and the Atlantic Undersea Test and Evaluation Center (AUTEC). FY10-11 budget funds MRTFB facility to 90% of DoD sustainment model.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 21 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
2922, MRTFB MAINT AND REPAIR
BA-6
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Line Item No. & Name
Not Applicable.
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 22 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
FY 2008
0.671
FY 2009
0.691
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
3029, T&E POLICY SUPPORT
FY 2010
0.758
RDT&E Articles Qty "Not Applicable"
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides funds to support Test and Evaluation (T&E) policy, transformation, programming, requirements
validation, and T&E dispute arbitration and resolution in an evolutionary acquisition environment. This expertise is also used as required to support the completion of the Navy T&E mission
including oversight of T&E plans for Navy and Joint acquisition programs, liaison with other agencies on T&E matters, development of T&E strategic plans, conduct of T&E studies and
assessments, formulation and validation of T&E capability needs, assessment and support of future testing of formal acquisition programs, and identification of Science and Technologies
required to support T&E of future acquisition programs.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 23 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
3029, T&E POLICY SUPPORT
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
T&E Policy & Requirements Validation Support
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
0.671
FY 09
0.691
FY 10
0.758
Provides funding for labor, material, and travel in support of the Test and Evaluation (T&E) policy and requirements validation.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 24 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
3029, T&E POLICY SUPPORT
BA-6
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Line Item No. & Name
Not Applicable.
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 25 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /
BA-6
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
FY 2008
11.389
FY 2009
11.660
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
3154, NANOOSE AND DABOB
FY 2010
11.795
RDT&E Articles Qty "Not Applicable"
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides maintenance and operations support for the Nanoose and Dabob Bay Ranges along with associated
support systems to provide Test and Evaluation (T&E) and readiness assessment services for acquisition programs and the Fleet. Operates ocean-based environment, measurement and
support systems. Maintains and repairs systems that measure warfare system performance. Oversees test, training, and measurement facilities, equipment, operations and maintenance
processes. Satisfies customer exercise and measurement requirements through the operation of ocean based test and measurement systems. Assures the readiness of systems through the
implementation of calibration, maintenance, repair and life cycle processes. Performs exercise planning, exercise interpretation and development of surrogate environments, measurement and
support systems. Assists in the design, fabrication and testing of systems for Undersea Warfare (USW) warfare environment simulation and performance measurement. Oversees the manning
and maintenance of Naval Undersea Warfare Center (NUWC) Division Keyport range craft and range craft systems.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 26 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
3154, NANOOSE AND DABOB
B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
Undersea Ranges
Accomplishments/Effort/Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity "Not Applicable"
FY 08
11.389
FY 09
11.660
FY 10
11.795
This project funds the overhead/Institutional costs required to sustain the Major Range Test Facility Base (MRTFB) capabilities at the Nanoose and Dabob Bay undersea tracking ranges.
Funds are used to maintain and operate mission essential/core test support resources associated with the unique test environments for test and evaluation of undersea weapons, sensors,
submarines and other undersea systems required to meet customer test workload. Funds civilian labor, travel, transportation, equipment, supplies, communication, equipment maintenance,
purchased service contracts, annual utilities and any costs necessary to manage and sustain MRTFB operations. Reimburses the Command for General and Administrative support services.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 27 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /
0605864N, TEST AND EVALUATION SUPPORT
3154, NANOOSE AND DABOB
BA-6
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Line Item No. & Name
Not Applicable.
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.149
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a, RDTEN Project Justification
Page 28 of 28
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605865N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
Project
Number
& Title
FY 2008
Actual
FY 2009
Estimate
FY 2010
Estimate
Total
PE
12.092
12.162
12.010
0831 OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION FORCE
(OPTEVFOR) SUPPORT
11.644
11.674
11.512
2923 NAVY JT&E SUPPORT
0.448
0.488
0.498
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This program element (PE) provides Commander,
Operational Test and Evaluation Force (COMOPTEVFOR) general support funding for headquarters annual operating
costs and ensures COMOPTEVFOR compliance with Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) and Secretary of the Navy (SECNAV)
directives to conduct independent operational testing and evaluation. Funding supports planning, conducting,
and reporting on the operational effectiveness and suitability of new and improved systems and recommending
fleet usage to the Chief of Naval Operations (CNO). Funding is also used to support ongoing development and
implementation of new requirements relative to integrated testing. The CNO, as well as acquisition executives
and managers at all levels, have a continuing need for expeditious and efficient conduct of Operational Test
and Evaluation (OT&E) by COMOPTEVFOR in support of training and equipping fleet forces. OT&E issues have
direct long term Navy-wide implications on the Fleet’s readiness and war fighting capability. Rapid advances
in technology, changes in fleet tactics, and increased complexity of weapons systems and platforms, combined
with reductions in manpower, force structure, and budgets have created an increased need for technical and
operational analyses that are sophisticated and timely in order to ensure an optimal return on investment of
Navy resources. Funding is also provided for Navy support of the Office of the Secretary of Defense (OSD)
sponsored Joint Test and Evaluation (JT&E) program.
R1 Line Item 150
Page 1 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605865N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
President's Budget 2009
Congressional Program Reductions
Program Adjustments
SBIR/STTR Transfer
President's Budget 2010
FY 2008
12.094
0.000
0.000
-0.002
12.092
FY 2009
12.195
-0.033
0.000
0.000
12.162
FY 2010
12.626
0.000
-0.616
0.000
12.010
PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY EXPLANATION:
Technical: Not applicable.
Schedule: Not applicable.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
E. PERFORMANCE METRICS:
As indicated in section A above, funding within this PE provides for core headquarters operations and support
(O&S) costs related to required operational testing and evaluation (T&E) conducted in support of Navy
acquisition programs. The preponderance of funding, specifically project 0831, provides for the annual O&S
for day to day operations of the staff/headquarters of COMOPTEVFOR, located in Norfolk, Virginia. (Pursuant
to DoD Financial Management Regulations and Navy financial policy guidance, as a T&E activity, COMOPTEVFOR's
annual support costs are funded via RDTEN vice OMN; hence, and unlike most RDT&EN programs, these funds
provide for O&S costs typical of military field commands/activities). Within the 0831 project, over half of
the funding supports salaries of assigned civilian personnel. The remaining funds provide for other routine
support costs such as travel, IT support, supplies, and other overhead/administrative support costs. The
second project within the PE, 2923, supports testing and evaluation of various Joint/multi-service programs in
which the Navy shares responsibilities in support of the acquisition community. The primary metric used
within the program involves support for scheduled Navy acquisition program testing and subsequent analysis and
R1 Line Item 150
Page 2 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2
DATE: May 2009
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605865N
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY
reporting of results of testing to appropriate senior Navy acquisition officials and to the Navy chain of
command directly to the CNO and various OPNAV/SECNAV staff offices. The performance goal is met when all
assigned/scheduled testing and reporting is supported each year. Specific test program success is measured
through analytic results of testing conducted throughout the year and constant interaction with program
offices, acquisition decision makers, OPNAV staff resource sponsor offices, OSD and other service T&E
offices/activities, and miscellaneous other customers/stakeholders. The following metrics relate directly to
the funding provided and are applicable to current operations.
Number of Tests Conducted
Number of Programs Supported
FY08
122
604
FY09
134
604
FY10
143
604
R1 Line Item 150
Page 3 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605865N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0831
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY
PROJECT TITLE: OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION FORCE (OPTEVFOR) SUPPORT
COST: (Dollars in Millions)
Project FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
Number
Actual
Estimate Estimate
& Title
0831 OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION
FORCE (OPTEVFOR) SUPPORT
11.644
11.674
11.512
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This PE provides COMOPTEVFOR general support funding
for headquarters annual operating costs and ensures COMOPTEVFOR compliance with SECDEF and SECNAV directives
to conduct independent operational testing and evaluation as well as emerging requirements associated with
establishing and maintaining compliance with the Department of the Navy’s Continuity of Operation (COOP)
Program. Funding supports planning, conducting, and reporting on the operational effectiveness and
suitability of new and improved systems and recommending fleet usage to the CNO. Funding is also used to
support ongoing development and implementation of new requirements relative to integrated testing. The CNO
has a continuing need for expeditious and efficient conduct of OT&E by COMOPTEVFOR in support of training and
equipping fleet forces. OT&E issues have direct long term Navy-wide implications on the Fleet’s readiness and
war fighting capability. Rapid advances in technology, changes in fleet tactics, and increased complexity of
weapons systems and platforms, combined with reductions in manpower, force structure, and budgets have created
an increased need for technical and operational analyses that are sophisticated and timely to ensure an
optimal return on investment of Navy resources.
B.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
OPTEVFOR SUPPORT
FY 2008
11.644
FY 2009
11.674
FY 2010
11.512
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Continued to operationally test and evaluate CNO projects commensurate with authorized funding level.
- Continued to maintain level of effort associated with the DoD 5000-acquisition guidance, which requires
increased COMOPTEVFOR involvement in early operational assessments, developmental testing, advanced concept
R1 Line Item 150
Page 4 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605865N
PROJECT NUMBER: 0831
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY
PROJECT TITLE: OPERATIONAL TEST & EVALUATION FORCE (OPTEVFOR) SUPPORT
technology demonstrations, and advanced technology demonstrations.
- Continued to support the CNO's Sea Power 21 initiatives through continuous participation in Sea Trial and
Sea Enterprise efforts.
FY 2009 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY08.
FY 2010 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NON-NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R1 Line Item 150
Page 5 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605865N
PROJECT NUMBER: 2923
Project FY 2008
FY 2009
Number
Actual
Estimate
& Title
2923 NAVY JT&E SUPPORT
0.448
0.488
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY
PROJECT TITLE: NAVY JT&E SUPPORT
FY 2010
Estimate
0.498
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: This project provides funding for Navy support of the
OSD-sponsored JT&E program. This funding covers cost associated with facilities, personnel, and
administrative support for T&E-focused Navy-led Joint Feasibility Studies and Joint Tests to ensure Navy
compliance with requirements established by directive from the SECDEF to carry out the JT&E program. The
funding is used for planning, conducting, and reporting the results of T&E-focused JT&E projects to assess the
interoperability of recommendations on improvements in joint technical and operational concepts, to evaluate
and validate testing methodologies having multi-service application, to assess technical or operational
performance of interrelated and/or interacting systems under realistic joint operational conditions, and to
provide data from joint field tests and exercises with which to validate models, simulations, and test beds.
This funding is essential for Navy participation with the other services in these critical joint areas.
B.
ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
JOINT TEST & EVALUATION
FY 2008
0.448
FY 2009
0.488
FY 2008 Accomplishments:
- Continued to support JT&E projects as directed by the JT&E Senior Advisory Council.
FY 2009 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY08
FY 2010 Plans:
- Continue all efforts of FY09.
R1 Line Item 150
Page 6 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010
0.498
UNCLASSIFIED
FY 2010 RDT&E,N BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION SHEET
Exhibit R-2a
BUDGET ACTIVITY: 06
PROGRAM ELEMENT: 0605865N
PROJECT NUMBER: 2923
DATE: May 2009
PROGRAM ELEMENT TITLE: OPERATIONAL TEST AND EVALUATION CAPABILITY
PROJECT TITLE: NAVY JT&E SUPPORT
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY - NON-NAVY RELATED RDT&E:
Not applicable.
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not applicable.
R1 Line Item 150
Page 7 of 7
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
DATE
May 2009
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
0605866N/NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW)
SUPPORT
RDTEN/BA 6
COST (In Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
Total PE Cost
2.366
2.698
2.703
0706 / EMC & RF Mgmt
1.617
2.018
2.089
0739 / NAVY C4 TOP LEVEL RQMTS
0.749
0.680
0.614
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION:
Project 0706, Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Reduction and Radio Frequency (RF) Management - Develops advanced technology to identify and reduce EMI sources from Navy systems
and platforms. Funding supports the FY2009 start of the Nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Survivability Program and a programmatic adjustment in FY2010 of Shipboard
Electromagnetic Compatibility Improvement Program (SEMCIP), an element of the Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Systems Engineering Program.
Project 0739, Navy Command, Control, Communications, Computers, and Intelligence (C4I) Top Level Requirements -This project provides analysis of both Fleet requirements and
research and development technology to develop top-level plans and space systems in the Space and Electronic Warfare (SEW) mission area. The Space and Electronic Warfare Studies
and Analysis Program (SEWSAP) supports analyses of Fleet requirements and research and development technology to develop top-level plans for operating Navy Command, Control,
Communications, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) and space systems in the SEW mission area.
JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY:
This program is funded under RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT because it supports the operations and installations required for general research and development use.
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
Funding:
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY09 President's Budget
2.386
2.708
FY10 President's Budget
2.366
2.698
2.703
(0.020)
(0.010)
(0.159)
0.000
Total Adjustments
2.862
(U) Summary of Adjustments
Congressional Adjustments
0.000
(0.007)
SBIR/STTS/FTT Assessment
(0.018)
0.000
0.000
Program Adjustments
(0.002)
(0.001)
(0.146)
0.000
(0.002)
(0.013)
(0.020)
(0.010)
(0.159)
Rate/Misc Adjustments
Total
R-1 Line Item No 151
PAGE 1 of 6
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2
RDT&E BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605866N/NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW)
SUPPORT
RDTEN/BA 6
COST (In Millions)
Project Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
FY 2008
FY 2009
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0706/EMC & RF Mgmt
FY 2010
1.617
2.018
2.089
0
0
0
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Reduction and Radio Frequency (RF) Management. This project develops tools, processes, and algorithms to identify and reduce EMI sources
for Navy systems and platforms.
(a) Automated spectrum capabilities will be enhanced that reflect current Fleet Operational Requirements and streamline Strike Force frequency management processes. Provide
automated Spectrum Management (SM) Tools for development of Operational Task Communication and Radar/Weapon plans to support Fleet deployments, Exercises, and Contingency
Operations. Provides identification and mitigation of EMI in Navy, NATO, Allied, Ashore and Joint Combat Operations.
(b) Supports the Shipboard Electromagnetic Compatibility Improvement Program (SEMCIP), an element of the Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Systems Engineering Program to
identify, engineer, and evaluate effectiveness of potential EMI corrections.
(c) Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Survivability Program provides for the Navy response to Secretary of Defense (SECDEF) tasking to assess the EMP survivability of all mission
critical systems and to develop a hardness assurance and maintenance program. Develops improved modeling capability to reduce hardness validation costs at delivery and over
the lifetime of the system/platform. Provides design criteria, test methodology, test limits, and survivability validation procedures for all Navy systems, ships, submarines
and shore facilities.
(d) Advanced Technology: Investigates below deck electromagnetic environmental effects and develops the capability to perform remote spectrum monitoring and electromagnetic
noise monitoring. Also, develops the tools and technologies for innovative and efficient spectrum use, and continues the development of relationships between measured EMI and
system performance for selected communications systems.
R-1 Line Item No 151
PAGE 2 of 6
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605866N/NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW)
SUPPORT
0706/EMC & RF Mgmt
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
FY 2008
AESOP (Integrated CPM and EMCAP)
FY 2009
0.855
FY 2010
0.879
0.761
RDT&E Articles Quantity
0
0
0
FY 2008 Accomplishments - Developed interfaces for AESOP (Afloat Electromagnetic Spectrum Operations Program), and other automated tools to interface with evolving network
protocols and to ensure currency for web based applications. Developed new algorithms for automated tools for new Navy Command, Control, Communications, Computers,
Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) systems for both government and commercial communication systems being used by the Navy.
FY 2009 - Continuing development of interfaces for AESOP, and other automated tools to interface with evolving network protocols and to ensure currency for web based
applications. Develop new algorithms for automated tools for new Navy C4ISR systems for both government and commercial communication systems being used by the Navy. Implement
a set of web-based capabilities utilizing latest technologies (XML) and other data standards to optimize information exchange/usability. Institutionalize frequency management
process for operational fleet by developing procedures that can be utilized by all Navy Strike Groups. Make recommendations to update existing combatant commands, and
numbered fleets directives regarding spectrum use in their areas of responsibility. Coordinate with ranges regarding impacts of spectrum relocation for systems used during
tests, such as telemetry and data collection. Update the AESOP with the new radiation restrictions that reflect current legal requirements that result from spectrum
relocation worldwide.
FY 2008
EMP Survivability
FY 2009
0.005
FY 2010
0.928
1.000
RDT&E Articles Quantity
0
0
0
FY 2008 Accomplishments - Completed and delivered a technical summary report titled "Pulse Current Injection (PCI) Technique Applied to US Navy Ships for Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP)
hardness Assurance; an Investigation and Historical Summary", dated 10 June 2008.
FY 2009 -2010 PLANS - Prepare EMP Survivability Assessment and EMP Hardness Maintenance Plans. Prepare updates to OPNAVINST/NAVSEAINST for EMP Survivability based on
the requirements of the new DODI 3150.9. Develop computational electromagnetic modeling and simulation capabilities and alternative techniques to reduce hardness validation
costs at delivery. Support Navy and DTRA in the development of a Maritime EMP Standard in accordance with ATSD/NCB memo 7 Apr 2007. This includes conducting a baseline
EMP assessment of an LCAC in support of the Maritime Standard development.
FY 2008
Advanced Technology
FY 2009
0.757
FY 2010
0.211
0.328
RDT&E Articles Quantity
0
0
0
FY 2008 Accomplishments - Completed initial below decks Electromagnetic Environmental Effects (E3) characterization. Selected spaces to date assessed aboard USS KEARSARGE
(LHD 3) and USNS SACAGAWEA (TAKE 2); USS BATAAN (LHD 5), and USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (CVN 72).
FY 2009 - 2010 PLANS - Continue below decks characterization; investigate availability of predictive software applications, and
develop tools/technologies for managing the below decks electromagnetic environment (EME).
R-1 Line Item No 151
PAGE 3 of 6
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION (CONTINUATION)
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605866N/NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE
(SEW) SUPPORT
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0706/EMC & RF Mgmt
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not Applicable
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable
R-1 Line Item No 151
PAGE 4 of 6
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605866N/NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE (SEW)
SUPPORT
RDTEN/BA 6
COST (In Millions)
Project Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
FY 2008
FY 2009
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
0739/NAVY C4 TOP LEVEL RQMTS
FY 2010
0.749
0.680
0.614
0
0
0
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
This project provides analysis of both Fleet requirements and research and development technology, to develop top-level plans and space systems in the Space and Electronic
Warfare (SEW) mission area. The Space and Electronic Warfare Studies and Analysis Program (SEWSAP) supports analyses of Fleet requirements and research and development
technology to develop top-level plans for operating Navy Command, Control, Communications, Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) and space systems in the SEW
mission area.
Performance Metrics:
Conduct and report upon studies, plans and analysis of Fleet requirements for operating Navy C4ISR and space systems in the SEW mission area.
R-1 Line Item No 151
PAGE 5 of 6
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
DATE
May 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDTEN/BA 6
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605866N/NAVY SPACE AND ELECTRONIC WARFARE
(SEW) SUPPORT
0739/NAVY C4 TOP LEVEL RQMTS
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
FY 2008
NAVY C41 TOP LEVEL REQUIREMENTS
FY 2009
0.749
FY 2010
0.680
0.614
RDT&E Articles Quantity
0
0
0
FY 2008 ACCOMPLISHMENTS: Initiated and completed studies supporting resource and requirement decisions in the Planning, Programming, and Budgeting Executing (PPBE) System;
FORCEnet Fleet experiments; FORCEnet Architecture selection; evaluation of Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTP); alignment of Science and Technology (S&T) and Research
and Development, Test and Evaluation (RDT&E) efforts with FORCEnet requirements; evaluation and selection of Modeling and Simulation (M&S) tools and scenarios.
SEWSAP (1) applied previously-developed models and analytical methods to identify areas of highest sensitivity in Command, Control, Communications (C3) performance, (2)
extend previous architectural work on Naval operational functions and networks to detailed analyses of C3 and network requirements and, (3) extend previous system engineering
results to newly emerging implementation issues.
FY 2009 - 2010 PLANS: Continue initiating and completing studies supporting resource and requirement decisions in the Planning, Programming, Budgeting and Execution (PPBE)
System; FORCEnet Fleet experiments; FORCEnet Architecture selection; evaluation of Tactics, Techniques, and development, Test, and Evaluation (RDT&E) efforts with FORCEnet
requirements; evaluation and selection of Modeling and Simulation (M&S) tools and scenarios.
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
Not Applicable
D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY:
Not Applicable
E. MAJOR PERFORMERS:
R-1 Line Item No 151
PAGE 6 of 6
CLASSIFICATION:
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a
RDT&E PROJECT JUSTIFICATION
UNCLASSIFIED
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E,N, BA 6
Cost ($ in Millions)
Project 1034
Quantity of RDT&E,N Articles
Exhibit R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
Date: May 2009
R-1 Item Nomenclature - Space & Electronic Warfare Surveillance/Reconnaissance Support
0605867N, Link Crimson
FY08
FY09
FY10
23.915
25.270
20.921
N/A
N/A
N/A
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Link Crimson program was congressionally chartered in 1977 (updated in 1980) to oversee the
tactical use of reconnaissance satellites. The program rapidly develops (1-2 years) prototype systems, sensors, and software that exploit space systems to support tactical Fleet
problems. Additionally, Link Crimson focuses on elements of National ISR systems and National-Tactical Integration operations to rapidly fill tactical capability gaps via improved,
fused, all-source products at multiple security levels. Link Crimson also supports and participates in fleet exercises, which provide the venue for testing and demonstrating new
prototype capabilities and enhancements to existing programs into which R&D efforts transition.
(U) The current baseline will be used to conduct an analysis of alternative options to improve MDA through development of auto-correlation, auto-tracking and data mining tools, to
fuse multi-INT data for both the timely creation of tracks and the predictive analysis of merchant vessel behavior. Baseline will also address analysis into potential BMD threats
and cross domain solutions. Additional detailed information is available at a higher level of classification. This program is funded under Budget Activity 6 because it supports the
operations and installations required for general research and development use.
B. (U) PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
PB09
PB10
Total Adjustments
FY08
23.915
23.915
0.000
FY09
25.358
25.270
(0.088)
FY10
24.224
20.921
(3.303)
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
O&M,N/1C3C
FY08
0.223
FY09
0.230
FY10
0.232
D. (U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not Applicable
E. (U) PERFORMANCE METRICS: Not Applicable
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDTE Budget Item Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 152
Page 1 of 2
UNCLASSIFIED
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E,N, BA 6
Cost ($ in Millions)
Link Crimson/Z1034
Quantity of RDT&E,N Articles
Date: May 2009
Exhibit R-2a, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
R-1 Item Nomenclature - Space & Electronic Warfare Surveillance/Reconnaissance Support
0605867N, Link Crimson
FY08
FY09
FY10
23.915
25.270
20.921
N/A
N/A
N/A
A. (U) MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION: The Link Crimson program was congressionally chartered in 1977 (updated in 1980) to oversee the tactical
use of reconnaissance satellites. The program rapidly develops (1-2 years) prototype systems, sensors, and software that exploit space systems to support tactical Fleet problems.
Additionally, Link Crimson focuses on elements of National ISR systems and National-Tactical Integration operations to rapidly fill tactical capability gaps via improved, fused, all-source
products at multiple security levels. Link Crimson also supports and participates in fleet exercises, which provide the venue for testing and demonstrating new prototype capabilities
and enhancements to existing programs into which R&D efforts transition.
(U) The current baseline will be used to conduct an analysis of alternative options to improve MDA through development of auto-correlation, auto-tracking and data mining tools, to fuse
multi-INT data for both the timely creation of tracks and the predictive analysis of merchant vessel behavior. Baseline will also address analysis into potential BMD threats and cross
domain solutions. Additional detailed information is available at a higher level of classification. This program is funded under Budget Activity 6 because it supports the operations and
installations required for general research and development use.
(U) Z1034: Established to exploit all National and Service sensor systems to improve tactical support to fleet operational commanders. Project also supports fleet exercises, which
provide the venue for testing modifications to existing programs and being
B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
Accomplishment/Effort
Joint Exercise/Training
Precision Strike/Mission Planning
ASW/USW
Improved Information Management (Data Dissemination/Exploitation/Analysis)
Battlespace and Maritime Domain Awareness (ASuW)
Assured Navigation & Support to Mine/Littoral/Expeditionary Warfare
Information Operations/GWOT
FY08
1.000
0.900
5.700
2.000
11.315
1.000
2.000
23.915
FY09
0.900
1.400
5.000
5.000
9.970
1.000
2.000
25.270
FY10
0.900
2.000
4.000
2.800
8.021
1.000
2.200
20.921
C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
O&M,N/1C3C
FY08
0.223
FY09
0.230
FY10
0.232
D. (U) ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not Applicable
E. (U) MAJOR PERFORMERS: Not Applicable
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2, RDTE Budget Item Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 152
Page 2 of 2
UNCLASSIFIED
Date: May 2009
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /BA-6 Management Support
0605873M Marine Corps Program Wide Support
COST ($ in Millions)
Total PE Cost
C0030 Marine Corps Studies and Analyses
C0033 Marine Corps Operational Testing & Evaluation Activity
C2330 Family of Incident Response Systems (FIRS)
C2930 Phase A Activities
C9999 Congressional Adds
Quantity of RDT&E Articles
FY08
22.113
6.224
0.000
1.822
7.029
7.038
FY09
30.167
6.631
3.918
4.028
10.005
5.585
FY10
19.004
6.556
3.955
4.25
4.243
0.000
FY10 OCO FY10 Total
0.000
19.004
0.000
6.556
0.000
3.955
0.000
4.250
0.000
4.243
0.000
0.000
A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
This program element (PE) provides the analytical foundation for the Marine Corps Studies System (MCSS), including mandated Mission Area Analyses and Cost
and Operational Effectiveness Analyses. The MCSS is the front end of the Marine Corps’ acquisition system.
This program is funded under RDT&E MANAGEMENT SUPPORT because it supports the operations and installation required for general research and
development use.
B. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY
Funding:
FY 2009 President's Budget:
FY 2010 President's Budget:
Total Adjustments:
Summary of Adjustments:
a. SBIR/STTR Transfer:
b. Program Adjustments:
c. Congressional Adjustments:
d. Rate/Misc Adjustment:
Subtotal
FY2008 FY2009
FY2010
27.039
22.113
-4.926
24.687
30.167
5.480
25.417
19.004
-6.413
-0.120
5.600
______
5.480
-5.816
-0.317
-0.280
-6.413
-0.315
-4.611
______
-4.926
R-1 Item No. 153
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2
Page 1 of 11
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY:
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
0605873M
Marine Corps Program Wide Support
C0030 Marine Corps Studies and Analysis
RDT&E, N /BA-6 Management Support
FY 2010OCO FY 2010 Total
FY 2008
FY 2010
FY 2009
COST ($ in Millions)
0.000
6.717
6.224
6.631
Project Costs
6.717
0
1
1
1
1
RDT&E Articles Qty
(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
Project funds the general studies and analysis portion of the Marine Corps Studies System (MCSS) and provides the analytical underpinnings and foundation for the MCSS. Funds a
variety of studies and analyses approved for execution in the annual Marine Corps Studies System Master Plan (MCSSMP) including mandated Mission Area Analyses (MAAs),
Milestone A, and Pre-Milestone A (Conceptual) Analysis of Alternatives (AoAs), technology assessments, force structure analysis, weapons systems analysis, concept development
and analysis, logistics analysis, cost benefit analysis, training assessments, feasibility analysis, scenario development, and other analyses in support of the Program Objective
Memorandum (POM) initiatives and the Marine Corps, as a whole. The MCSS also supports the Marine Corps' acquisition system, the Expeditionary Force Development System
(EFDS), and the Combat Development Process (CDP). The Mission Area Analyses (MAA) process provides quantitative and qualitative information to decision makers for basing
decisions effecting improvements in operational concepts, doctrine, force structure, education, training, and procurement.
MCSS provides analytical support to decision makers for resolution of current problems and issues identified by the operating forces and utilizes Marine Corps Research University to
conduct studies and analysis projects in basic and applied research and Advanced Technology Development. Funds were provided to the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA)
for direct support, technical, analyses, and liaison services to assure a sound bridge between the Marine Corps' role in defining Expeditionary Warfare Specialist (EXW)/Seabasing
requirements and the SEA 05 role for Future Concepts and Ships Designs for amphibious ships/aircraft. Maritime Prepositioning Force (Future), (MPF (F)), High Speed Connectors,
Sea based operations and related systems. SPAWAR was funded to support Naval Assessment Program to modify and upgrade all DoN war fighting, crisis response and support
capabilities and vulnerabilities to provide baseline of future capabilities for further analysis. Baseline analysis supports Mission Capability Packages (MCPs), Investment Strategy, Joint
Capability Areas (JCAs), and the Naval Strategic Plan to provide the DoN with the assessments necessary for future force development.
The MCSS also makes use of the Marine Corps Research University to conduct studies and analysis projects in the areas of basic and applied research and Advanced Technology
Development. Funds were provided to the Naval Sea Systems Command (NAVSEA) to provide direct support, technical, analyses, and liaison services that will assure a sound bridge
between the Marine Corps' role in defining Expeditionary Warfare Specialist (EXW)/Seabasing requirements and the SEA 05 role in executing Future Concepts and Ships Designs for
amphibious ships/aircraft. Maritime Prepositioning Force (Future), (MPF (F)), High Speed Connectors, Sea based operations and related systems. SPAWAR was provided funding to
support the Naval Assessment Program to modify and upgrade all DoN war fighting, crisis response and support capabilities and vulnerabilities in order to provide a baseline of future
capabilities for further analysis. This baseline analysis supports Mission Capability Packages (MCPs), Investment Strategy, Joint Capability Areas (JCAs), and the Naval Strategic
Plan that will provide the DoN with the assessments necessary to support future force development.
(U) B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
COST ($ in Millions)
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
FY 2008
6.224
FY 2009
6.631
FY 2010
6.717
FY 2010 OCO
0.000
RDT&E Articles Qty
1
1
1
0
FY09: continue and complete the following FY 08 efforts: Pythagoras Counterinsurgency; Marine Aviation Logistics Support Program (MALS III) Lift Capability Optimization Model
(MALCOM); Engineer Equipment Petroleum Equipment Institute (PEI)-to-Maintainer Ratios; MAGTF Bulk Fuel; Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF)Depot Capacity for Joint
Materials; MAGTF Distribution Center Update Study and the . Mobile Electric Power (MEP) and Environmental Control Requirements Study.
R-1 Item No. 153
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a
Page 2 of 11
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY:
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER
0605873M
Marine Corps Program Wide Support
C0030 Marine Corps Studies and Analysis
RDT&E, N /BA-6 Management Support
FY09: initiate following efforts: Marine Air Ground Task Force (MAGTF) Command and Control (C2) Systems and Emergency Situations Study: analyze training and education on C2
systems and Marine Corps capabilities to provide responding Joint Task Force (JTF) headquarters in emergency situations. Bandwidth Requirements Study: determine amount of
communication bandwidth required throughout entire Marine Corps Intelligence Surveillance Reconnaissance - Enterprise (MCISR-E) architecture for current and future operations;
and assess bandwidth requirement against current and future Marine Corps capabilities (programs of record, etc) and determine the corresponding shortfalls and/or surpluses.
Explosive Hazard Capability Study (EOD): to determine a more effective way of supporting the explosive hazard reduction requirements for mobility operations within the MAGTF and
identify the most appropriate placement of EOD assets within Marine Corps Forces.
Expanded Fleet Mobility and Support Teams (FMAST) III - Follow-on study to FMAST: capture all the Marine Corps' Type 1 equipment in FMAST vice all vehicles and rolling stock
and generate the following Measures of Effectiveness (MOEs) for various MAGTFs. Combine information gathered in Tasks 1 and 2 Strategic Mobility, Aggregate footprint (weight,
area, and volume) relative to available strategic lift and Tactical Mobility.
Maritime Prepositioned Ships Squadron/Maritime Prepositioned Forces (MPSRON/MPF(F) Excursion Study Mission Analysis: identify programmatic and warfighting risks and benefits,
and recommend alternatives/adjustments to the current geographic prepositioning, legacy MPF, and MPF(F) programs of record. Time Domain Analysis for Airspace C2 Study: to
define Marine Aviation C2 Time Domain (TD) in quantifiable and measurable terms for: Real-Time (RT), Near-Real-Time (NRT), and Non-Real-Time (Non-RT) and define Marine
Aviation C2 Data Fusion (DF) requirements in quantifiable and measurable terms. Future (PP&O); MPS Loadout Study (II Marine Expeditionary Force MEF); MAGTF Core
Competencies (II MEF) Naval Expeditionary Warfare (NEXW) Assessment : Baseline assessment of amphibious warfare capabilities and proficiency (PP&O); enabling capabilities
needed to support smaller scale MAGTF operations in the future (PP&O); MPS Loadout Study (II MEF); MAGTF Core Competencies (II MEF). Marine Corps Training and Advisory
Group (MCTAG) Deployment Analysis Study: study will examine the operational drivers that affect the deployments and their implications for MCTAG in coordinating, forming, training
Anti-Armor Study: identify the overall anti-armor requirements for a Marine Air-Ground Task Force (MAGTF),develop and evaluate various weapons systems (force) mixes for the
MAGTF and document the range of densities and distributions on current or alternative organizational locations. Initiate the high priority studies and analyses projects approved in the
FY2009 - FY2010 Marine Corps Studies System Master Plan (MCSSMP).
FY 2008
6.224
(U) Total $
FY 2009
6.631
FY 2010
6.717
FY 2010 OCO
0.000
(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not Applicable.
(U) Related RDT&E: PE 0605154N (Center for Naval Analysis (CNA), Project C0031 (Marine Corps Operations Analysis Group)
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not Required.
(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS: Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity contracts as follows:
FY05 - FY10
FY06 - FY10
FY06 - FY10
FY06 - FY10
Academia Analytical Support Services Contract.
Northrop Grumman Mission Systems (NGMS), Fairfax, VA for Military Modeling, Simulation, Analytical, and Support Services. May 06
Northrop Grumman Mission Systems (NGMS), Fairfax, VA for Logistics Modeling, Simulation, Analytical, and Support Services Contract. Sep 06
Group W Professional Services Support Contract, Fairfax, VA for Professional Services and Research. Sep 06
(U) SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not Applicable
R-1 Item No. 153
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R-2a
Page 3 of 11
UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
MAY 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /BA-6 Management Support
C0033 Marine Corps OT&E Activity
0605873M Marine Corps Program Wide Support
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY2010 FY2010 0C0 Total FY2010
0
3.918
3.955
0
3.955
Project Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
The Marine Corps Operational Test and Evaluation Activity (MCOTEA) supports the material acquisition process by managing the Marine Corps Operational Test (OT)
programs for Acquisition Categories (ACAT) I through ACAT IV (less OT of manned aircraft) and performs other functions that may be directed by the Commandant of the
Marine Corps. The primary purpose of Operational Test and Evaluation (OT&E) is to provide information to the Milestone Decision Authority (MDA) regarding the Operational
Effectiveness (OE) and Operational Suitability (OS) of the system addressed at a decision point. MCOTEA must ensure that the Marines in the Operating Forces receive the
very best possible equipment and support. MCOTEA must also ensure each system proposed for acquisition is tested adequately, evaluated objectively and reported
independently. This funding supported salaries of MCOTEA mission employees and physical overhead.
(U) B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY2010 OCO
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
0.000
3.918
3.955
0.000
RDT&E Articles Qty
MCOTEA:
0.000
3.918
3.955
0.000
(U) Total $
(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
(U) Related RDT&E: Not Applicable.
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGNot Required.
(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS: Not Applicable.
Not Applicable
R-1 Item No. 153
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R2a
Page 4 of 11
UNCLASSIFIED
DATE:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT:
RDT&E, N /BA-6 Management Support
0605873M Marine Corps Program Wide Support
C2330 Family of Incident
Response Systems (FIRS)
COST ($ in Millions)
FY2008
1.822
FY2009
4.028
FY2010
4.250
FY2010
OCO
0.000
FY2010
Total
4.250
Project Cost
(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
The Family of Incident Response Systems (FIRS) consists of equipment, systems, and services designed to provide weapons of mass destruction (WMD) incident
response forces the capabilities needed to respond to a terrorist attack using Chemical, Biological, Radiological, Nuclear, and High-Yield Explosives (CBRNE). The
Family of Incident Response Systems meets the mission requirements for the detection; mass casualty decontamination; force protection; responder inter-agency
interoperability; C4I; urban search and rescue; medical and general support requirements needed by these forces to mitigate the effects of a CBRNE terrorist attack.
The Family of Incident Response Systems relies primarily on Commercial Off-The-Shelf/Non-Developmental Items (COTS/NDI) equipment and systems that meet
the particular mission requirements of Consequence Management (CM). Nuclear, Biological, and Chemical (NBC) systems are adopted if they meet the CM
mission requirements. The Family of Incident Response Systems (FIRS) R&D effort allows the program to keep abreast of emerging technologies in the commercial
sector and address operational capability gaps that cannot be met by commercial items.
(U) B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2010 OCO
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
0.923
2.116
2.002
0.000
RDT&E Articles Qty
)
g g
g
j
with the Department of Homeland Security and the Technical Support Working Group (TSWG) 2) assessment of Hand-Held Biological Detection Systems 3)
transition of a Field Chemical Analytical Tool (GC/MS) 4) testing and evaluation of a portable bio-aerosol sampler 5) evaluation and testing of an arsenic detector 6)
development and testing of the Chemical Biological Incident Response Force (CBIRF) Standoff Chemical Agent Detector in conjunction with the TSWG.
Incorporates previous CBIRF RDT&E activities.
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2010 OCO
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
0.100
0.150
0.300
0.000
RDT&E Articles Qty
FIRS: Search and Rescue (SAR) Mission Area. Includes 1) assessment of emerging technologies to locate viable casualties through debris of a collapsed building
or through standing structures, such as walls and doors 2) evaluation of SAR HazMat boots that can be decontaminated 3) evaluation of Commercial Off the Shelf
(COTS) and emerging SAR tools. Incorporates previous CBIRF RDT&E activities.
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2010 OCO
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
0.100
0.350
0.300
0.000
RDT&E Articles Qty
FIRS: Decontamination Mission Area includes 1) assessment of the effectiveness of packetized liquid decon solutions in civilian mass casualty events 2)
development and evaluation improved mass casualty decon equipment (flash heaters) and procedures. Incorporates previous CBIRF RDT&E activities.
R-1 Item No. 153
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R2a
Page 5 of 11
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
May 2009
PROJECT:
RDT&E, N /BA-6 Management Support
0605873M Marine Corps Program Wide Support
C2330 Family of Incident
Response Systems (FIRS)
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2010 OCO
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
0.100
0.150
0.000
0.150
RDT&E Articles Qty
FIRS: C4I Mission Area includes 1) technology assessments 2) field user evaluations 3) prototypes.
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2010 OCO
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
0.299
0.762
0.698
0.000
RDT&E Articles Qty
FIRS: Force Protection Mission Area Includes the 1) transition of the Improved Level A Protective Ensemble developed in concert with Technical Support Working
Group (TSWG) 2) radiation hardness survey and assessment of COTS CM equipment 3) development and validation of an electronic filter matrix from military and
commercial filter testing data. 4) testing and evaluation of a hydration system in conjunction with the Army. 5) testing and evaluation of the M-53 mask as a system
with Commercial Self Contained Breathing Apparatus and Powered Air Purifying Respirators. Incorporates previous CBIRF RDT&E activities.
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2010 OCO
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
0.100
0.100
0.300
0.000
RDT&E Articles Qty
FIRS: Medical Mission Area Includes 1) development and decontamination testing of cumulative dose dosimeter 2) evaluation of patient tracking systems 3)
development of a Standoff patient triage tool. 4) development and testing of gloves with increased dexterity.
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY 2010 OCO
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
0.200
0.400
0.500
0.000
RDT&E Articles Qty
FIRS: General Support Mission Area Includes 1) Prototyping and testing of modified COTS and GOTS vehicles for the deployment of incident response equipment
(EOD, SAR).
TOTAL
1.822
4.028
4.250
0.000
(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY:
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY 2010
Line Item No. & Name
(U) PMC Line (BLI# 652200)
28.203
29.037
6.811
Field Medical Equipment
(U) Related RDT&E: Not Applicable.
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not Required.
(U) D. SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not Applicable.
R-1 Item No. 153
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R2a
Page 6 of 11
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /BA-6 Management Support
COST ($ in Millions)
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605873M Marine Corps Program Wide Support
FY 2008
7.029
FY 2009 FY 2010
10.005
4.243
MAY 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
C2930 Phase A Activities
FY2010 0C0 FY2010 TOTAL
0
4.243
RDT&E Articles Qty
(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
Pre-Phase A Activities include assessments, surveys, and planning activities in support of the requirements generation system to mature, limit, clarify and define
requirements before competition for resources in the POM process and transition to acquisition management. This effort will complement the currently funded Marine Corps
Systems Command (MCSC) Phase A Activities line to pursue a limited range of items on a priority basis, examining critical issues and alternatives. Examples of activities
include but are not limited to (1) development of Operational Mode Summaries, Mission Profiles, Concepts of Employment and Acquisition Objectives, (2) mapping between
legacy systems and replacements, (3) examining integration and family of systems architectural issues, (4) performing Doctrine, Organization, Training, Equipment, Support,
Facilities (DOTESF) assessments and
providing other key support for the Universal Needs Statement (UNS) process, (5) base-lining POM initiatives, (6) planning requirements support of evolutionary acquisition,
(7) facilitating user/advocate interaction to better understand what is needed and how it will be used, and (8) supporting the Marine Requirements Oversight Council (MROC)directed tailoring Authorized Acquisition Objective process.
Marine Corps Combat Development Command (MCCDC) averages approximately 62 UNS requests per year addressing new requirements, of which approximately 20%
require expedited processing. Quick reaction assessment and planning is likely to support requirements emerging from current real world operations. Clear Facilities, a
Command Element (CE) Army Research Laboratory (ARL) item (supported by the Marine Corps Ground Combat Element (GCE)) requiring a continuum of materiel solutions
(family of systems) to enable lethal clearing of a broad range of man-made structures in multiple environments/tactical situations typifies a requirement needing pre-Phase A
support. Supporting activities have centered around decomposition of the mission into 460 specific tasks accompanied by development of an operational concept, objectives
and key performance parameters, and warfighter prioritization. The end product will be a requirements road map. The end state will be a process and product to guide both
POM and acquisition activities.
These activities do not overlap/conflict with Mission Area Analysis and Analysis of Alternatives funded within the MCCDC Studies and Analysis (S&A) program, MCSC Phase
A Activities, Marine Corps Warfighting Lab (MCWL) warfighting experimentation or Science and Technology (S&T) activities. Pre-phase A Activities allow high priority
requirements to move ahead in advance of funding decisions for specific programs, provide a better capability to react to emerging requirements and improve the quality of
initiatives brought to the POM process. Through front-end assessment, relatively modest funding can be leveraged into significant cost and schedule savings, bringing
needed capabilities to the operating forces sooner and cheaper. Each POM cycle provides examples of initiatives that are unfunded or delayed by an immature requirement
or understanding of alternatives. In other cases the initiative is funded but the acquisition cycle stretches out until the requirement is better understood. Pre Phase A
facilitates a timely and more efficient process.
Phase A Activities consist of a series of interrelated activities in Phase A (previously known as Phase 0) of the acquisition process designed to investigate potential material
solutions to validate needs, estimate program costs, support sound business decisions, correct inherent disconnects between the Programming, Planning, Budgeting and
Execution (PPBE) cycle, the Combat Development and Acquisition Management Systems, and prevent undue delays in pursuing priority requirements. The process
supports Commanding General (CG), MCCDC and Commander, Marine Corps Systems Command (COMMARCORSYSCOM) by providing funding to priority programs, thus
allowing for the examination of concepts and alternatives to support an orderly transition from requirements to initiatives and initiatives to funded programs. This will permit
the POM process to focus on activities of evaluating, prioritizing and integrating rather than defining and resolving raw, immature requirements. Phase A activities literally
“jump start” high priority programs of the acquisition process. Furthermore, since 70% of a program's life cycle cost is determined during Phase A, this initiative will put
resources to work where the return on investment
R-1 Item No. 153
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R2a
Page 7 of 11
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
MAY 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N /BA-6 Management Support
0605873M Marine Corps Program Wide Support
C2930 Phase A Activities
(payoff) is the greatest. Typical studies conducted Phase A activities include, but are not limited to Market Surveys, Business Case Analysis (BCA), Cost as an Independent
Variable (CAIV) analysis, Life Cycle Cost Estimates, Cost Comparison Analysis, Acquisition Strategies, Trade-off Analysis in lieu of an Analysis of Alternatives.
To satisfy the emerging requirements, the Deputy Commandant for Combat Development is leading the MEFFV effort to conduct Joint Capability Integration and
Development System analysis to establish a capabilities framework specifically tailored to assess technologies for transition to the MAGTF. During the timeframe (20042010) MEFFV efforts are directed at capability refinement and integration, analysis of multiple concepts, determining technology objectives, and continued development of
Initial Capabilities Documents (ICDs) and Capabilities Development Documents supporting Spin Out technology transitions. This budget item supports combat development
activities supporting the three MROC priorities in compliance with JROC and USD AT&L guidance to participate in a Joint Program with the Army’s Future Combat Systems
Program.
(U) ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
COST ($ in Millions)
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
FY 2008
2.085
FY 2009
4.315
FY 2010
4.243
FY2010 0C0
0.000
Phase A Activities - Initiate, assist and complete Phase A activities of high priority programs during their concept refinement and in some cases their technology
development phases in the areas of Business Case Analysis, Trade Studies, Economic Analysis, Life Cycle Cost Estimates and Market Research Studies in support of the
following efforts: Electronic Records Management, Net Enabled Command Capability, Target Processing, Ground Based Air Defense, Ground Based Operational
Surveillance, Optical Systems, Route Reconnaissance and Clearance, Mortar Fire Control and Indirect Fire, Ground Radio and Maintenance and the Squad Immersive
Training Environment.
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY2010 0C0
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
3.771
4.229
0.000
0.000
RDT&E Articles Qty
Pre-Phase A Activities - Provides for the conduct of high priority Pre-Phase A Activities for Reconnaissance Surveillance Target Acquisition, Joint Tactical Radio System,
Assault Breacher Vehicle, Follow-On Shoulder Launcher Weapon System (Analysis of Alternative/Op Mode Summary/Mission Profile) War Reserve Materiel Requirement
Development, Tier II UAV concept of employment & Initial Capabilities Document, Force Protection concepts and and requirements assessments, establish alternatives for
the Joint Light Tactical Vehicle, traceability findings for seabasing capabilities of the future, provide for integration of concepts for the Joint command and control arena, and
examine engineering initial capabilities concepts.
Systematically improves the requirements and capabilities determination process by supporting the mechanisms and tools required for initial setup and continuing
development of the Joint Capabilities Integration and Development System (JCIDS) process; support tools, collaboration, and mechanisms that continue the refinement and
enhancement of both the Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare Capabilities List (ECL) and Expeditionary Forces Development System (EFDS) ensuring the identification and
prioritization of clearly defined capability gaps.
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY2010 0C0
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
1.173
1.461
0.000
0.000
RDT&E Articles Qty
R-1 Item No. 153
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R2a
Page 8 of 11
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /BA-6 Management Support
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605873M Marine Corps Program Wide Support
MAY 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
C2930 Phase A Activities
Pre-Phase A - Future Combat Vehicle - Force Design Trades: Employ the Joint Capability Integration and Development System to derive roles, capability needs and
attributes of MAGTF armor units performing in future service and joint operational concepts. Complete Functional Solution Analysis (FSA) and Concept Decision for MAGTF
needs potentially addressed by FCS systems, components or Spin Out products. Develop Expeditionary Armored Forces (EAF) mission profiles and operational mode
summary. Develop an Operations and Organization documents for FCS Spin Out products potentially meeting MAGTF needs. Conduct an EAF Evaluation Strategy,
providing metrics or the needed capabilities. Provide personnel and travel necessary to participate in FCS and Unit of Action IPTs and planning for FCS Spin Out products.
Technology Assessments: To support MCCDC JCIDS assessments of Army FCS capabilities. Technology assessments will be conducted to define technology
maturity/readiness and issues for potential USMC adoption. Technology assessments, technology development strategy and consideration of technology issues shall be
used to evaulate FCS technologies, including Spin Outs, and platforms (combat vehicles, UAVs, Unmanned Ground Vehicles, unattended sensors, and unattended
munitions) of interest, based on developing MCCDC Inital Capabilities Documents (ICD) and Capability Development Documents (CDD). This shall include market research
to determine alternate sources of technology. In support of MROC directed C4I integration (now called Systems Engineering, Interoperability Architectures and Technology
(SIAT)) with FCS, assess architecture commonality, and assess/resolve technology barriers to C4I interoperability/integration (SIAT). Such technology assessment activities
shall be coordinated with the Office of Naval Research, including monitoring Functional Naval Capabilities (FNC) developments for component commonality opportunities
and participating in joint ONR/FCS technology initiatives. In support of FCS assessment, explore survivability initiatives through service and joint wargames and experiments
Systems Integration Plan: Develop the architecture based Systems Engineering Plan to support development and integration in preparation for Systems Development and
Demonstration tasks. Establish a database compatible with both the Expeditionary Force Development System for DOTMLPF Integration and the Army’s FCS Systems
Integration methodologies for current and future MAGTF systems design integration. Develop modeling and simulation approach and determine feasibility of FCS
components on MAGTF systems. Populate EFDC system integration databases, based on capability options for meeting Expeditionary Maneuver Warfare (EMW) capability
needs. Evaluate design excursions. Examine risk mitigation methodologies. Build business technology evaluation plan and strategy for measuring progress.
Office and Acquisition Analysis: Fund capabilities, acquisition and technology team documentation development and coordinate successive integration of activities.
Administrative support, (Systems Engineering and Technical Assistance (SETA))/contractor support. Project office travel, training and office materials.
(U) Total $
(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: Not Applicable
(U) Related RDT&E: Not Applicable.
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: Not Required.
(U) D. SCHEDULE PROFILE: Not Applicable.
7.029
R-1 Item No. 153
UNCLASSIFIED
10.005
4.243
0.000
Exhibit R2a
Page 9 of 11
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /BA-6 Management Support
DATE:
MAY 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
C9999 Congressional Adds
FY2010 FY2010
FY 2008 FY 2009 FY2010 OCO
TOTAL
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605873M Marine Corps Program Wide Support
COST ($ in Millions)
Project Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
7.038
5.585
0.000
0.000
0.000
(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
(U) B. ACCOMPLISHMENTS/PLANNED PROGRAM:
FY 2008
FY 2010
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2009
FY2010 OCO
0.000
0.000
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
0.771
0.000
RDT&E Articles Qty
C9A64A - Individual Chemical Alert System - The ChemAlert™ detector, manufactured by Smith’s Detection, Inc., is a hand-held electronic detector, designed for
portability and rapid detection of chemical vapors. ICAS is a low cost and highly sensitive small lightweight chemical detector capable of monitoring both Chemical Warfare
Agents (CWAs) and Toxic Industrial Chemical (TICs) and is suitable for multiple environments.
FY2010 OCO
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
0.000
0.000
0.000
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
2.699
RDT&E Articles Qty
C9C44A - Automated Identification and Data Capture (AIDC) Solutions Center - To develop an implementation plan for the adoption of AIDC technology to streamline
and automate the Marine Corps Logistics Command’s (MCLC) equipment accountability processes for wholesale level inventory. The plan will address storage operations
of the warehouses and open lot storage for Albany, GA and Barstow, CA, as well as supporting broader Enterprise Distribution Department requirements in serving as the
Distribution Process Owner for the Marine Corps.
COST ($ in Millions)
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
FY 2008
2.411
FY 2009
0.000
FY 2010
0.000
FY2010 OCO
0.000
RDT&E Articles Qty
C9C45A - Chameleon Chemical Detection Armband - Morphix Technologies has developed a hands-free passive chemical detection system named Chameleon for
gases and vapors in the air. Chameleon is a system for real time detection of low level chemical exposures to select Toxic Industrial Chemicals (TICs) for U.S. Forces. The
Chameleon easily attaches to the forearm for hands-free detection of gases and vapors in the air - no need for a liquid sample. The design also eliminates interferences
from smoke or particulates. The Chameleon armband is field-configurable, allowing you to decide which chemical threats you need to detect. The Chameleon armband is
designed for easy on/off to fit any forearm; even over turn-out gear. It can be used for one cassette or as many as ten.
R-1 Item No. 153
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R2a
Page 10 of 11
UNCLASSIFIED
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RDT&E, N /BA-6 Management Support
COST ($ in Millions)
DATE:
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
0605873M Marine Corps Program Wide Support
FY 2008
MAY 2009
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
C9999 Congressional Adds
FY 2010
FY 2009
FY2010 OCO
0.000
1.596
0.000
0.000
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
C9E06A - Logistics Technology Improvements - funding will be used to update technology that allows for hands free update of inventory files via various automatic
identification (AIT) Active Radio Frequency Identification (AFRID), providing Logistics Command with similar warehousing efforts found commercially.
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
FY2010 OCO
COST ($ in Millions)
0.000
1.596
0.000
0.000
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
C9E07A - Global Supply Chain Management - funding is intended to establish a Center for Advanced Logistics Management in Albany, Georgia to facilitate collaboration
and assist in fulfilling the needs of military logistical organizations, providing real world knowledge of managing supply chains and logistics in a highly competitive, global
i
t
FY 2009
FY2010 OCO
COST ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2010
1.157
2.393
0.000
0.000
Accomplishment/Effort Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Qty
C9C46A - USMC Logistics Analysis & Optimization - Design and Prototype of IT enablers, for capabilities enhancement and to test solutions prior to infusing technology
or replacing USMC logistics tools.
(U) Total $
7.038
5.585
0.000
0.000
(U) C. OTHER PROGRAM FUNDING SUMMARY: N/A
(U) Related RDT&E: N/A
(U) D. ACQUISITION STRATEGY: N/A
(U) E. MAJOR PERFORMERS: N/A
R-1 Item No. 153
UNCLASSIFIED
Exhibit R2a
Page 11 of 11
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
RESEARCH DEVELOPMENT TEST & EVALUATION, NAVY /
COST ($ in Millions)
Total PE Cost 0305885N
0037 Tact Combat Oper Sys
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
0305885N - Tactical Cryptologic Activities
BA-06
FY 2008
1.498
FY 2009
1.993
May 2009
FY 2010
2.464
Quantity of RDT&E Articles
(U) A. MISSION DESCRIPTION AND BUDGET ITEM JUSTIFICATION:
This is a continuing program that will provide advanced technologies and capabilities to current Electronic Warfare/Electronic Intelligence system programs of record (POR) by developing concepts of data/information
exchange within the Global Information Grid (GIG) as envisioned by Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) and outlined within the FORCEnet concept. To comply with the intent of the GIG, this program will address
compression, transmission, de-compression, re-compression and long term storage of targeted data/information without degradation. This program will become an enabler for future capabilities such as remote operation
of surface, subsurface, and air EW/ELINT open architecture PORs. A holistic approach to data/information format, processing, transmission, and storage will require developments in antenna technology, communications
capabilities, operational concepts, and software development.
(U) JUSTIFICATION FOR BUDGET ACTIVITY:
This project support the Chief of Naval Operations vision for implementation of FORCEnet.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No.
PRESBUD 2010
Page 1 of 3
154
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-06
0305885N - Tactical Cryptologic Activities
0037 Tactical Combat Oper Sys
May 2009
(U) B. Accomplishments/Planned Program
JIIOR Management
RDT&E Articles Quantity
FY 08
1.498
FY 09
1.993
FY 10
2.464
FY08 PLAN:
- System development for the collection of Advanced Electronically Scanning Array (AESA) radars.
- Antenna Technology Development and Advances: To continue to meet changing environmental and technology requirements, NNWC will continue to invest in advanced antenna technology in
partnership with NRL, CNO, ONI, DNR, Combatant Fleet Commanders, and National partners.
FY09 PLAN:
Continue development as outlined for FY08.
FY10 PLAN:
Continue development as outlined for FY08.
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 154
PRESBUD 2010
Page 2 of 3
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER AND NAME
PROJECT NUMBER AND NAME
RDT&E, N / BA-6
0305885N - Tactical Cryptologic Activities
0037 Tactical Combat Oper Sys
May 2009
(U) C. PROGRAM CHANGE SUMMARY:
(U) Funding:
PresBud 09
PresBud 10
Total Adjustments
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
1.498
1.498
0.000
1.998
1.993
(0.005)
2.500
2.464
(0.036)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
(0.005)
0.000
(0.005)
0.000
(0.036)
(0.036)
Summary of Adjustments:
Congressional Adjustments
Rate/Misc. Adjustments
Total Adjustments
0.000
0.000
0.000
(U) Schedule:
Not Applicable
(U) Technical:
Not Applicable
R-1 SHOPPING LIST - Item No. 154
PRESBUD 2010
Page 3 of 3
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY2009 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET ESTIMATES
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
DATE:
May 2009
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Service Support To JFCOM, JNTC - 0804758N
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
Research Development Test & Evaluation, Navy
Cost ($ in Millions)
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
Total PE Cost
4.932
5.134
4.197
Project 3152 Service Support to JFCOM, JNTC
4.932
5.134
4.197
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:
In accordance with the FY 2005 National Defense Authorization Act, in FY 2008, JNTC RDT&E managed by Joint Forces Command (JFCOM)
transfered from Navy P/E 0804758N to Defense-Wide P/E 0804758D. To maintain execution control, Navy maintained it's JNTC RDT&E for
Service Support to JFCOM in P/E 0804758N. This management change reflects the decentralized execution of JNTC RDT&E from JFCOM to
Navy. In FY 2009, these funds will continue to be managed and executed by United States Fleet Forces Command (USFF) Fleet Training and
Technology Branch.
The Navy continues to develop joint training technologies that will play a crucial role in its ability to address current and future joint operational
training requirements. Navy program activities include conducting research, development, test and evaluation and cross-service architecture
certification on Navy capable systems, developing architectures and roadmaps to ensure that service instrumentation follows a common
standard, and researching and assessing Navy mission rehearsal, Joint Semi-Automated Forces (JSAF), JNTC JLVC FOM Interoperabilities,
Remote Interface Control, Virtual Communications Multi-Modal Interface, and Coalition / Inter-Agency integration requirements.
The Navy will further develop capabilities that integrate live, virtual, and constructive elements into a seamless joint training environment. Using
a scientific and phased approach, Navy will leverage and research new technologies and methods, based upon focused joint operational training
requirements, that provide a crucial technology-based foundation supporting all current and "to be" Navy joint training capabilities. Available
commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) and government -off-the-shelf (GOTS) networked information technologies and collaborative planning tools will
be leveraged to provide improved net-centric joint training capability. Navy will lead the collaboration process to identify, collect and validate the
requirements in order to design and develop the modeling and simulation capabilities that address the shortfalls in current abilities to support
Joint Task training to standards.
The Navy JNTC RDT&E Program efforts directly support the Unified Command Plan (UCP) series and is aligned with the DoD Information
Operations (IO) Roadmap
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 155
1 of 9
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY2009 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET ESTIMATES
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
DATE:
May 2009
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
Research Development Test & Evaluation, Navy
Project 3152 Service Support to JFCOM
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
BA 6
(U) B. Program Change Summary:
(U) Funding:
Previous PRESBUD 09
Current PREBUD Budget / PPBS Baseline PB09
Total Adjustments
Summary of Adjustments
Congressional Adjustments
Program Adjustments
Rate/Misc. Adjustments
$
$
$
Service Support To JFCOM, JNTC - 0804758N
FY 2008
FY 2009
FY 2010
4.970 $
5.148 $
5.258
4.932 $
5.134 $
4.197
0.038 $
0.014 $
1.061
($0.014)
($0.038)
$4.932
$0.000
$5.134
($1.000)
($0.061)
$4.197
Schedule: N/A
Technical:
N/A
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary:
(U) D. Acquisition Strategy:
N/A
N/A
(U) E. Performance Metrics:
1) Provide Joint Semi-Automated Forces (JSAF) software with a focus on stability and robustness improvements to JSAF as well as interfaces to other Live-VirtualConstructive components. Support Mitigation of Training Program shortfalls through architectural and model development targeting identified enhancements that support
training at unit, strike force and staff levels. Support Architecture and Data Standards development through collaborative engineering between Navy, service and joint
training activities for common LVC architecture and data standards. Research Multilevel Security (MLS) and Multinational Information Sharing (MNIS) solutions through
architectural development to identify cost-effective MLS and MNIS solutions through extending existing NCTE interfaces, including Radiant Mercury Guard. Support Joint
Training Environment Network (JTEN) Expansion and Migration through architectural development to the expansion and migration of the NCTE and JTEN by improving
the use of wide area networking resources through reductions in bandwidth and throughput required to support simulation interest management.
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 155
2 of 9
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY2009 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET ESTIMATES
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2, RDT&E Budget Item Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
Research Development Test & Evaluation, Navy
BA 6
DATE:
May 2009
R-1 ITEM NOMENCLATURE
Service Support To JFCOM, JNTC - 0804758N
(U) E. Performance Metrics:
2) Facilitate integration by providing dedicated support to the effort, improving the quality of participation and documentation of Navy efforts in the JNTC.
Refine and mature the Navy Training Federation Object Model (NTF), it is improving interoperability and integration with other services and the Joint community.
Provides a standardized Federation Object Model (FOM) for integration across the Navy training simulations.
3) The multi-tiered technology approach currently implemented in Joint distributed exercises presents challenges to asset control and monitoring. collective
system control is sparse at best. Emerging research in the area of global control architectures and mechanisms is advancing the state of the art in
communication network/system control. A current advanced research initiative, Remote Interface Control (RIC), has established an architecture capable of
controlling the five layers of the communications network infrastructure that must be addressed as Joint and multi-national events continue to expand: (1) live
and virtual radio control, (2) Internet Protocol network control, (3) security administration and control, (4) system health, and (5) support services.
4) Current Joint Live-Virtual-Constructive (JLVC) and other federation simulation distribution is accomplished by tying simulation data to multicast groups. This
is neither a scalable solution nor is it an effective one as federates are not able to publish and subscribe with fine enough precision. The Simulation Aware
Software Router will address this shortcoming, and additionally provide a flexible solution for federating heterogeneous networks and on-the-wire protocols
without forcing all federates onto a single, uniform, lowest common denominator solution for each training event. Ultimately, a simulation aware router will allow
simulation users to optimize the network for both simulation scalable traffic and for voice and Command, Control, Communications, (Computers), Intelligence
(C4I) traffic.
5) Naval aviation training components will require the ability to transport multi-modal (e.g. secure, non-secure, coalition, etc.) voice communication
simultaneously on the Navy Continuous Training Environment (NCTE) and other networks during Joint fleet exercises. As the Navy Aviation Simulation Master
Plan (NASMP) integrates within the NCTE and other Joint training environments, multi-modal virtual communication technology is required for Naval aviation
components to participate in multi-national, multi-service, and fleet coalition training events.
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 155
3 of 9
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY2009 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET ESTIMATES
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
Project Name and Number
JSAF Improvement Program (JIP)
Project 3152 Service Support to JFCOM
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
Research Development Test & Evaluation, Navy
Cost ($ in Millions)
JSAF Improvement Program
RDT&E Articles Quantity
FY 2008
$
2.678
n/a
FY 2009
$
2.787
n/a
FY 2010
$
2.364
n/a
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:
Navy Warfare Development Command (NWDC) provided dedicated software development, configuration management, verification and validation and
engineering management support to ensure that Fleet and Joint requirements were incorporated into Joint Semi-Automated Forces (JSAF) software through
the JSAF configuration management and requirements process managed by the Navy. NWDC managed evolving requirements submitted by Joint and Fleet
representatives to develop new capabilities and improve reliability and maintainability of the JSAF software simulation. NWDC defined, developed and
chaired the JSAF Users Group to work on technical issues related to JSAF such as identifying root-causes and recommending and applying corrective
actions to multiple issues. NWDC managed and performed regression testing for and accomplished mulitple releases / updates to JSAF. In FY 2008, NWDC
supported user acceptance testing and opchecks in seven major Navy Carrier / Expeditionary Strike Group exercises (FST-J 08-1, 08-2, 08-3, 08-4, 08-5,
RIMPAC and PC-FST).
FY 2009 Plan: The Navy focus is to ensure that Fleet and Joint requirements for maintenance and stability are incorporated into JSAF software through the
JSAF configuration management and requirements process managed by the Navy. The NWDC team will manage evolving requirements submitted by Joint
and Fleet representatives to develop new capabilities and improve reliability and maintainability of the software simulation. Continue in the development,
configuration management, and operational support of the JSAF Modeling and Simulation (M&S) application, used for training purposes, which currently
servers as the primary modeling and simulation engine for the Naval Continuous Training Environment (NCTE). NWDC NCTE activities for FY 2009 include
two JSAF software releases and coordination and facilitation of Navy JSAF Users Group Meetings during the year. In FY 2009, NWDC plans to support user
acceptance testing and opchecks in ten major Navy Carrier / Expeditionary Strike Group exercises (FST-J 09-1, 09-2, 09-3, 09-6, 09-71, 09-72, 09-8, PC-FST,
FST-GC BAT, and FST-GC HST).
FY 2010 Plan: In FY 2010, funding for the maintenance of established JSAF baseline efforts migrates to the FST/NCTE P/E 0204219N. In FY 2010, the
JSAF RDT&E development effort focus incorporates changes required to begin incorporating the program of records that the JNTC/Navy Training FOM effort
below has focused upon. FY 2010 sees major federations efforts, and therefore change, with JSAF and the high level testing required to ensure interoperable
systems that yield validated results in a sophisticated and distributed Navy & Joint Training system.
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 155
4 of 9
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY2009 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET ESTIMATES
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
Research Development Test & Evaluation, Navy
(U) B. Accomplishments / Planned Program:
Accomplishment / Effort / Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity - N/A
DATE:
May 2009
Project Name and Number
JSAF Improvement Program (JIP)
Project 3152 Service Support to JFCOM
BA 6
$
FY 2008
2.678
n/a
$
FY 2009
2.787
n/a
$
FY 2010
2.364
n/a
Accomplishments include the stability and robustness improvements to support Fleet Synthetic Training. Improved capability of Automated Status Boards and
Link 16 Information Display for the Tactical Training Group Schoolhouses. Improved capability of Class III and V Logistics, TBMCS mission support interface,
and Intel fidelity (ELINT) in support of JNTC and NTF/PACOM requirements. Improved capability in support of virtual and constructive users such as: Manned
Flight Systems’ H-60R and H-60S trainers, JLVC, and NWDC.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary:
P1 Procurement Line: N/A
C-1 MILCON Project Number: N/A
Related RDT&E: N/A
(U) D. Acquisition Strategy:
N/A
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 155
5 of 9
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY2009 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET ESTIMATES
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
DATE:
May 2009
Project Name and Number
JNTC/JLVC Navy Training FOM Support
Project 3152 Service Support to JFCOM
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
Research Development Test & Evaluation, Navy
Cost ($ in Millions)
JNTC/JLVC Navy Training FOM Support
RDT&E Articles Quantity
FY 2008
$
1.098
n/a
FY 2009
$
1.582
n/a
FY 2010
$
1.353
n/a
(U) A. Mission Description and Budget Item Justification:
Naval Warfare Development Command (NWDC) continued to support the development of standards in networking, simulation federation, and tactical
system interfaces for Fleet Synthetic Training interoperability to meet training objectives. NWDC managed collaborative engineering of new and existing
Navy Continuous Training Environment (NCTE) federates to meet training objectives and NCTE engineering standards. NWDC drafted and released
Navy Training Federation Object Model (NTF) releases in conjunction with Navy Aviation Simulation Master Plan (NASMP), Joint Live Virtual and
Constructive (JLVC), and Submarine Multi-Mission Tactical Trainer (SMMTT) inputs. The NCTE Interoperability Guide was published and distributed to
the NCTE Integrated Product Team (IPT) members.
NWDC conducted several NCTE Interoperability Working Group meetings which focused on immediate interoperability issues as well as long-term
architectural standards development and accomplished the enhancments of team training capabilities. These new capabilities included Air Warfare team
training between pierside ships, virtual United States Air Force Airborne Warning and Control System (AWACS) trainer, the E-2C Deployable Readiness
Trainer, and F/A-18C cockpit trainers, facilitated by simulation role players using tactical system interfaces. Additionally, Anti-Submarine Warfare (ASW)
team training capabilities were enhanced by the additon of Mission Readiness Tactical Team Trainer (MRT3) based SH-60B and SH-60F deployable
trainers used in concert with pierside ships and simulation role-players. This dedicated support improved the quality of participation and documentation of
the Navy efforts in the Joint National Training Capability (JNTC), specifically improving Navy Training integration in the Joint Live-Virtual-Constructive
(JLVC).
FY 2009 JNTC-JLVC/NAVY Training FOM Plan: NWDC will continue to provide Navy/NCTE software developer and systems engineering,
interoperability support and architectural development support of the Navy Training Federation Object Model (FOM) and NCTE specifically focusing on the
JNTC LVC Federation. Specific goals for FY 2009 include the addition of team training capabilities in ASW and Undersea Warfare (USW) trainers (MH60R trainer, P-3C TORT, SH-60B/F WST) and AAW/MI (E-2C WST, EA-6B).
FY 2010 JNTC-JLVC/NAVY TRAINING FOM Plan: FY 2010 work continues across the warfighting spectrum of simulator integration into NCTE and
JSAF. Naval Aviation assets begin significant integration test and validation efforts as well as the test of significant enhancements to ASW integrated
training capabilities as a result of the foundation work accomplished from FY 2008 and the maturation of the process beginning in FY 2009.
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 155
6 of 9
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY2009 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET ESTIMATES
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-2a, RDT&E Project Justification
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
Research Development Test & Evaluation, Navy
(U) B. Accomplishments / Planned Program:
Accomplishment / Effort / Subtotal Cost
RDT&E Articles Quantity -
DATE:
May 2009
Project Name and Number
JNTC/JLVC Navy Training FOM Support
Project Service Support to JFCOM
BA 6
FY 2008
$
1.098
n/a
FY 2009
$
1.582
n/a
FY 2010
$
1.353
n/a
Accomplishments include the management of the Federation Object Model (FOM) to synchronize the following programs such as: JNTC/JLVC, NASMP, and
Virtual ASTAC. Maintained and enhanced system and model interoperability with legacy trainers such as: BMD flyouts for USA Patriot (FMS-D), EW support
for non-BFTT ships via BEWT/SLQ-32a, new AEGIS baseline 7.1.1.1; UK, German and Australian interfaces; MAST EP-3E, and SQQ-89 OBT interface
development (ILAU). Added or enhanced system and model interoperability with the following programs such as: Navy: MRT3 SH-60B/SH-60F, Virtual
ASTAC, F/A-18C Distributed Mission Trainer, E-2 Deployable Readiness Trainer, SMMTT and the Joint Arena such as JACTS, AWSIM, NWARGS-NG, JDLM,
JLOD, ACE-IOS and TACSIM.
(U) C. Other Program Funding Summary:
P1 Procurement Line: N/A
C-1 MILCON Project Number: N/A
Related RDT&E: N/A
(U) D. Acquisition Strategy:
N/A
Exhibit R-2, RDTEN Budget Item Justification
R-1 Line Item No. 155
7 of 9
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY2009 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET ESTIMATES
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-3, RDT&E Project Cost Analysis
DATE:
May 2009
Project Name and Number
Project 3152 Service Support to JFCOM
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
Research Development Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6
Cost Categories
Contract
Performing
FY 2009
(Taylor to WBS, or System/Item
Method &
Activity &
Award
Type
Location
Requirements)
FY 2009
FY 2010
Award
Date
FY 2010
Date
Product Development
Primary Hardware Development
$
-
$
-
Ancillary Hardware Development
$
-
$
-
Systems Engineering *
Various
Various
$
5.134
Oct-08
$
4.197
Licenses
$
-
$
-
Tooling
$
-
$
-
GFE
Award Fees
$
$
-
$
$
-
Sub-Total:
$
5.134
$
Oct-09
4.197
Remarks
* Training Systems Integration
** Continuing in FY2009 and beyond, United States Fleet Forces (USFF) Command Code N71 manages the execution of Navy JNTC RDT&E funding.
Support
Development Support
$
-
$
-
Software Development
$
-
$
-
Training Development
$
-
$
-
Integrated Logistics Support
$
-
$
-
Configuration Management
$
-
$
-
Technical Data
GFE
$
$
-
$
$
-
$
-
$
-
Sub-Total:
Remarks
Exhibit R-3, RDTEN Project Cost Analysis
R-1 Line Item No. 155
8 of 9
UNCLASSIFIED
UNCLASSIFIED
FY2009 PRESIDENT'S BUDGET ESTIMATES
CLASSIFICATION:
EXHIBIT R-3, RDT&E Project Cost Analysis
DATE:
May 2009
Project Name and Number
Project 3152 Service Support to JFCOM
APPROPRIATION/BUDGET ACTIVITY
Research Development Test & Evaluation, Navy / BA 6
Cost Categories
Contract
Performing
FY 2009
(Taylor to WBS, or System/Item
Method &
Activity &
Award
Type
Location
Requirements)
FY 2009
FY 2010
Award
Date
FY 2010
Date
Test and Evaluation
Developmental Test & Evaluation
$
-
$
-
Operational Test & Evaluation
$
-
$
-
Tooling
$
-
$
-
GFE
$
-
$
-
$
-
$
-
Contractor Engineering Services
$
-
$
-
Government Engineering Services
$
-
$
-
Program Management Support
$
-
$
-
Program Management Personnel
$
-
$
-
Travel
$
-
$
-
Labor (Research Personnel)
Overhead
$
$
-
$
$
-
Sub-Total:
$
-
$
-
Grand Total:
$
Sub-Total:
Remarks
Management Services
Remarks
Total Cost
5.134
Oct-08
$
4.197
Oct-09
Remarks
Exhibit R-3, RDTEN Project Cost Analysis
R-1 Line Item No. 155
9 of 9
UNCLASSIFIED