Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications ISSN: 1821-1291, URL: http://www.bmathaa.org Volume 2, Issue 3(2010), Pages 27-31. ON LOCAL PROPERTY OF FACTORED FOURIER SERIES WAAD SULAIMAN Abstract. In this paper generalization as well as improvement to the SarigoΜl’s result concerning local property of factored Fourier series has been achieved. 1. Introduction ∑ Let ππ be a given series with partial sums (π π ), and let (ππ ) be a sequence of positive numbers such that ππ = π0 + ... + ππ → ∞ as π → ∞. The sequence to sequence transformation ππ = π 1 ∑ π π£ π π£ ππ π£=0 deο¬nes the sequence (ππ ) of the (π , ππ ) means of the sequence (π π ) generated by ∑ the sequence of coeο¬cients (ππ ).The series ππ is said to be summable π , ππ , ππ , π ≥ 1 if (see [8]) ∞ ∑ π πππ−1 β£ππ − ππ−1 β£ < ∞. (1.1) π=1 In the special case when ππ is equal to ππ /ππ , π,we obtain π , ππ π , β£π , ππ β£π summabilities respectively. Let π be a function with period 2π, integrable (πΏ) over (−π, π). Without loss of generality, we may assume that the constant term of the Fourier series of π is zero, that is ∫π π (π‘)ππ‘ = 0, −π π (π‘) ≈ ∞ ∑ (ππ cos ππ‘ + ππ sin ππ‘) ≡ π=1 ∞ ∑ πΆπ (π‘). (1.2) π=1 The sequence (ππ ) is said to be convex if Δ2 ππ ≥ 0 for every positive integer π, where Δππ = ππ − ππ+1 . 2000 Mathematics Subject Classiο¬cation. 40G99, 43A24, 42B24. Key words and phrases. Absolute summability; Fourier series; Local property. c β2010 Universiteti i PrishtineΜs, PrishtineΜ, KosoveΜ. Submitted April, 2010. Published Jun, 2010. 27 28 W.T. SULAIMAN Generalizing the results( [1], [2], [5], [6]), Bor [3] has proved the following result Theorem 1.1. Let π ≥ 1 and (ππ ) be a sequence satisfying the conditions ππ = π(πππ ), (1.3) ππ Δππ = π(ππ ππ+1 ). (1.4) If (ππ ) is any sequence of positive constants such that )π−1 π ( ∑ ππ£ π π£ 1 (ππ£ )π = π(1), π π£ π£ π£=1 )π−1 π ( ∑ ππ£ π π£ ππ£ π£=1 (1.5) Δππ£ = π(1), (1.6) )π−1 π ( ∑ ππ£ π π£ 1 (ππ£+1 )π = π(1), π π£ π£ π£=1 and π+1 ∑ π=π£+1 ( ππ π π ππ )π−1 ππ =π ππ ππ−1 (( ππ£ π π£ ππ£ )π−1 (1.7) 1 ππ£ ) , (1.8) ∞ ∑ then the summability π , ππ , ππ π of the series πΆπ (π‘)ππ ππ /πππ at a point can π=1 ∑ −1 be ensured by local property, where (ππ ) is convex sequence such that π ππ is convergent. In his roll, SarΔ±goΜl [7] generalized the above Bor’s result by giving the following Theorem 1.2. Let π ≥ 1 and (ππ ) be a sequence satisfying the conditions Δ (ππ /πππ ) = π(1/π). (1.9) ∑ −1 Let (ππ ) is a convex sequence such that π ππ is convergent. If (ππ ) is any sequence of positive constants such that π ∑ ππ£π−1 π£=1 π ∑ π£=1 and π+1 ∑ π=π£+1 ( ππ π π ππ )π−1 ππ£ Δππ£ < ∞, π£ π ππ£ ππ£π−1 ( ππ£ π£ )π (1.10) < ∞, ππ =π ππ ππ−1 (( ππ£ π π£ ππ£ (1.11) )π−1 1 ππ£ ) , (1.12) ∞ ∑ then the summability π , ππ , ππ π of the series πΆπ (π‘)ππ ππ /πππ at a point can be ensured by local property of π. π=1 The following Lemmas are needed for our aim ON LOCAL PROPERTY OF FACTORED FOURIER SERIES 29 Lemma 1.3. [5]. If the sequence (ππ ) satisο¬es the conditions ππ = π(πππ ), (1.13) ππ Δππ = π(ππ ππ+1 ) (1.14) then Δ (ππ /πππ ) = π(1/π). (1.15) ∑ −1 Lemma 1.4. [4]. If (ππ ) is a convex sequence such that π ππ is convergent, then (ππ ) is non-negative and decreasing and Δππ → 0 as π → ∞. 2. Main Results The coming result covers all the results mentioned in the references Theorem 2.1. Let π ≥ 1, and let the sequences (ππ ), (ππ ), (ππ ) and (ππ ) where ππ > 0, are all satisfying β£ππ+1 β£ = π (β£ππ β£) , (2.1) ( ) ∞ π ∑ ππ πππ−1 β£ππ β£π β£ππ β£π < ∞, (2.2) π π π=1 ∞ ∑ π π πππ−1 β£ππ β£ β£Δππ β£ < ∞, (2.3) π=1 π−1 ∑ ππ£1−1/π β£ππ£ β£ π£=1 and π+1 ∑ π=π£+1 ( ππ π π ππ )π−1 ( ππ£ ππ£ )(1/π)−1 ππ =π ππ ππ−1 β£Δππ£ β£ < ∞, (( ππ£ π π£ ππ£ )π−1 (2.4) 1 ππ£ ) , (2.5) ∞ ∑ then the summability π , ππ , ππ π of the series πΆπ (π‘)ππ ππ at a point can be π=1 ensured by local property of f. Proof. Let (ππ ) denote the (π , ππ ) mean of the series πΆπ (π‘)ππ ππ . Then, we π=1 have ππ − ππ−1 ∞ ∑ = = = = π ∑ ππ ππ£−1 ππ£ ππ£ ππ£ ππ ππ−1 π£=1 ( π£ ) ( π ) π−1 ∑ ∑ ∑ ππ ππ ππ£ Δ (ππ£−1 ππ£ ππ£ ) + ππ£ ππ ππ ππ ππ−1 π£=1 π=1 π π π£=1 π−1 ∑ ππ ππ (−π π£ ππ£ ππ£ ππ£ + π π£ ππ£ Δππ£ ππ£ + π π£ ππ£ ππ£+1 Δππ£ ) + π π ππ ππ ππ ππ−1 π£=1 ππ ππ1 + ππ2 + ππ3 + ππ4 . In order to complete the proof, by Minkowski′ s inequality, it is suο¬cient to show that ∞ ∑ π < ∞, πππ−1 πππ π = 1, 2, 3, 4. π=1 30 W.T. SULAIMAN Applying Holder’s inequality, π+1 ∑ π=2 πππ−1 β£ππ1 β£ π = π+1 ∑ π=2 π+1 ∑ πππ−1 β£π π£ ππ£ ππ£ ππ£ β£ π (π−1 ) ∑ ππ£ π−1 π π π β£π β£ π β£π β£ β£π β£ π£ π£ π£ π£ ππ−1 ππ−1 π=2 π£=1 π£=1 ( )π π π+1 ∑ ∑ π π 1 = π(1) ππ£ β£ππ£ β£ β£ππ£ β£ πππ−1 ππππ ππ−1 π£=1 π=π£+1 ( )π−1 π ∑ 1 = π(1) ππ£ β£ππ£ β£π β£ππ£ β£π πππ£ ππ£π£ ππ£ π£=1 ( )π π ∑ π π = π(1) ππ£π−1 πππ£π£ β£ππ£ β£ β£ππ£ β£ = π(1). ≤ πππ−1 ( ππ ππ )π π−1 ∑ 1 π£=1 π+1 ∑ π πππ−1 β£ππ2 β£ = π=2 π+1 ∑ πππ−1 β£π π£ ππ£ Δππ£ ππ£ β£ π π=2 ≤ π+1 ∑ πππ−1 π=2 × (π−1 ∑ ( ππ ππ ππ−1 ππ£1−1/π β£ππ£ β£ π£=1 π ∑ ( )π π−1 ∑ β£π π£ β£ π ππ£π β£Δππ£ β£ β£ππ£ β£ ππ£(1−1/π)(1−π) π£=1 ππ£ ππ£ )(1/π)−1 β£Δππ£ β£ ( ππ£ ππ£ )(π−1)(1−1/π) )π−1 )(π−1)(1−1/π) π+1 ∑ )π ππ = π(1) ππ ππ−1 π£=1 π=π£+1 ( )(π−1)(1−1/π) π+1 ( )π π ∑ ∑ ππ 1 ππ£ = π(1) ππ£ β£Δππ£ β£ β£ππ£ β£ ππ£(1−1/π)(1−π) πππ−1 π π π π£ π π−1 π£=1 π=π£+1 ( ) ( )π−1 π (π−1)(1−1/π) ∑ ππ£ ππ£ π π£ = π(1) β£Δππ£ β£ β£ππ£ β£ ππ£(1−1/π)(1−π) ππ£ ππ£ π£=1 ( ) π (1/π)−1 ∑ ππ£ = π(1) ππ£1−1/π β£ππ£ β£ β£Δππ£ β£ = π(1). ππ£ π£=1 π+1 ∑ π πππ−1 β£ππ3 β£ = π=2 π+1 ∑ ππ£π β£Δππ£ β£ β£ππ£ β£ ππ£(1−1/π)(1−π) πππ−1 β£π π£ ππ£ ππ£+1 Δππ£ β£ ( ππ£ ππ£ πππ−1 ( π π=2 ≤ π+1 ∑ πππ−1 π=2 = π(1) ( ππ ππ π ∑ ππ£π ππ−1 π£=1 π£ π ∑ ππ£π = π(1) ππ−1 π£=1 π£ = π(1) π ∑ π£=1 (π−1 )π−1 ∑ ππ£ ππ£π π π β£π π£ β£ π−1 β£ππ£+1 β£ β£Δππ£ β£ ππ−1 π£=1 π ππ£ π£=1 π−1 ( ) π+1 π ∑ ππ 1 β£ππ£+1 β£π β£Δππ£ β£π πππ−1 ππ ππ−1 π=π£+1 ( )π−1 ππ£ π π£ 1 π π β£ππ£ β£ β£Δππ£ β£ ππ£ ππ£ )π 1 π π−1 ∑ π π ππ£π−1 β£ππ£ β£ β£Δππ£ β£ = π(1). ON LOCAL PROPERTY OF FACTORED FOURIER SERIES π+1 ∑ πππ−1 π β£ππ4 β£ = π=2 = π+1 ∑ π=2 π+1 ∑ π=2 πππ−1 πππ−1 π ππ π π ππ ππ ππ ( ππ ππ )π π 31 π β£ππ β£ β£ππ β£ = π(1). Since the behavior of the Fourier series concerns the convergence for a particular value of π₯ depends on the behavior on the function in the immediate neighborhood of this point only, this justiο¬es (1.2) and valid. This completes the proof. β‘ Remark. The result of [7] follows from theorem 2.1 by putting ππ = ππ /πππ , Δππ = π(1/π). Acknowledgments. The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for his/her comments that helped us improve this article. References [1] S. N. Bhatt, An aspect of local property of β£π , log π, 1β£ summability of the factored Fourier series, Proc. Nat. Inst. India 26 (1968) 69–73. [2] H. Bor, Local property of β£π, ππ β£π summability of the factored Fourier series, Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica. 17 (1980) 165–170. [3] H. Bor, On the local property of Fourier series. Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 1 (2009), 15–21. [4] H. C. Chow, On the summability factors of inο¬nite series, J. London Math. Soc. 16 (1941) 215-220. [5] K. Matsumoto, Local property of the summability β£π , ππ , 1β£ , Thoku Math. J. 2 (8) (1956) 114-124. [6] K. N. Mishra, Multipliers for π , ππ summability of Fourier series, Bull. Inst. Math. Acad. Sinica. 14 (1986) 431-438. [7] M.A. SarigoΜl, On the local property of the factored Fourier series, Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 1 (2009), 49-54. [8] W. T. Sulaiman, On some summability factors of inο¬nite series, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 115 (1992) 313-317. waad Sulaiman, Department of Computer Engineering, College of engineering, University of Mosul, Iraq E-mail address: waadsulaiman@hotmail.com