Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications ISSN: 1821-1291, URL:

advertisement
Bulletin of Mathematical Analysis and Applications
ISSN: 1821-1291, URL: http://www.bmathaa.org
Volume 2, Issue 3(2010), Pages 27-31.
ON LOCAL PROPERTY OF FACTORED FOURIER SERIES
WAAD SULAIMAN
Abstract. In this paper generalization as well as improvement to the Sarigöl’s
result concerning local property of factored Fourier series has been achieved.
1. Introduction
∑
Let
π‘Žπ‘› be a given series with partial sums (𝑠𝑛 ), and let (𝑝𝑛 ) be a sequence of
positive numbers such that
𝑃𝑛 = 𝑝0 + ... + 𝑝𝑛 → ∞ as 𝑛 → ∞.
The sequence to sequence transformation
𝑇𝑛 =
𝑛
1 ∑
𝑝 𝑣 𝑠𝑣
𝑃𝑛 𝑣=0
defines the sequence (𝑇𝑛 ) of the (𝑁 , 𝑝𝑛 ) means
of the sequence (𝑠𝑛 ) generated
by
∑
the sequence of coefficients (𝑝𝑛 ).The series π‘Žπ‘› is said to be summable 𝑁 , 𝑝𝑛 , πœƒπ‘˜ ,
π‘˜ ≥ 1 if (see [8])
∞
∑
π‘˜
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1 βˆ£π‘‡π‘› − 𝑇𝑛−1 ∣ < ∞.
(1.1)
𝑛=1
In the special case when πœƒπ‘› is equal to 𝑃𝑛 /𝑝𝑛 , 𝑛,we obtain 𝑁 , 𝑝𝑛 π‘˜ , βˆ£π‘…, 𝑝𝑛 βˆ£π‘˜ summabilities respectively.
Let 𝑓 be a function with period 2πœ‹, integrable (𝐿) over (−πœ‹, πœ‹). Without loss of
generality, we may assume that the constant term of the Fourier series of 𝑓 is zero,
that is
∫πœ‹
𝑓 (𝑑)𝑑𝑑 = 0,
−πœ‹
𝑓 (𝑑) ≈
∞
∑
(π‘Žπ‘› cos 𝑛𝑑 + 𝑏𝑛 sin 𝑛𝑑) ≡
𝑛=1
∞
∑
𝐢𝑛 (𝑑).
(1.2)
𝑛=1
The sequence (πœ†π‘› ) is said to be convex if Δ2 πœ†π‘› ≥ 0 for every positive integer 𝑛,
where Δπœ†π‘› = πœ†π‘› − πœ†π‘›+1 .
2000 Mathematics Subject Classification. 40G99, 43A24, 42B24.
Key words and phrases. Absolute summability; Fourier series; Local property.
c
⃝2010
Universiteti i Prishtinës, Prishtinë, Kosovë.
Submitted April, 2010. Published Jun, 2010.
27
28
W.T. SULAIMAN
Generalizing the results( [1], [2], [5], [6]), Bor [3] has proved the following result
Theorem 1.1. Let π‘˜ ≥ 1 and (𝑝𝑛 ) be a sequence satisfying the conditions
𝑃𝑛 = 𝑂(𝑛𝑝𝑛 ),
(1.3)
𝑃𝑛 Δ𝑝𝑛 = 𝑂(𝑝𝑛 𝑝𝑛+1 ).
(1.4)
If (πœƒπ‘› ) is any sequence of positive constants such that
)π‘˜−1
π‘š (
∑
πœƒπ‘£ 𝑝 𝑣
1
(πœ†π‘£ )π‘˜ = 𝑂(1),
𝑃
𝑣
𝑣
𝑣=1
)π‘˜−1
π‘š (
∑
πœƒπ‘£ 𝑝 𝑣
𝑃𝑣
𝑣=1
(1.5)
Δπœ†π‘£ = 𝑂(1),
(1.6)
)π‘˜−1
π‘š (
∑
πœƒπ‘£ 𝑝 𝑣
1
(πœ†π‘£+1 )π‘˜ = 𝑂(1),
𝑃
𝑣
𝑣
𝑣=1
and
π‘š+1
∑
𝑛=𝑣+1
(
πœƒπ‘› 𝑝 𝑛
𝑃𝑛
)π‘˜−1
𝑝𝑛
=𝑂
𝑃𝑛 𝑃𝑛−1
((
πœƒπ‘£ 𝑝 𝑣
𝑃𝑣
)π‘˜−1
(1.7)
1
𝑃𝑣
)
,
(1.8)
∞
∑
then the summability 𝑁 , 𝑝𝑛 , πœƒπ‘› π‘˜ of the series
𝐢𝑛 (𝑑)πœ†π‘› 𝑃𝑛 /𝑛𝑝𝑛 at a point can
𝑛=1
∑ −1
be ensured by local property, where (πœ†π‘› ) is convex sequence such that
𝑛 πœ†π‘› is
convergent.
In his roll, SarΔ±göl [7] generalized the above Bor’s result by giving the following
Theorem 1.2. Let π‘˜ ≥ 1 and (𝑝𝑛 ) be a sequence satisfying the conditions
Δ (𝑃𝑛 /𝑛𝑝𝑛 ) = 𝑂(1/𝑛).
(1.9)
∑ −1
Let (πœ†π‘› ) is a convex sequence such that
𝑛 πœ†π‘› is convergent. If (πœƒπ‘› ) is any
sequence of positive constants such that
π‘š
∑
πœƒπ‘£π‘˜−1
𝑣=1
π‘š
∑
𝑣=1
and
π‘š+1
∑
𝑛=𝑣+1
(
πœƒπ‘› 𝑝 𝑛
𝑃𝑛
)π‘˜−1
𝑃𝑣
Δπœ†π‘£ < ∞,
𝑣 π‘˜ 𝑝𝑣
πœƒπ‘£π‘˜−1
(
πœ†π‘£
𝑣
)π‘˜
(1.10)
< ∞,
𝑝𝑛
=𝑂
𝑃𝑛 𝑃𝑛−1
((
πœƒπ‘£ 𝑝 𝑣
𝑃𝑣
(1.11)
)π‘˜−1
1
𝑃𝑣
)
,
(1.12)
∞
∑
then the summability 𝑁 , 𝑝𝑛 , πœƒπ‘› π‘˜ of the series
𝐢𝑛 (𝑑)πœ†π‘› 𝑃𝑛 /𝑛𝑝𝑛 at a point can
be ensured by local property of 𝑓.
𝑛=1
The following Lemmas are needed for our aim
ON LOCAL PROPERTY OF FACTORED FOURIER SERIES
29
Lemma 1.3. [5]. If the sequence (𝑝𝑛 ) satisfies the conditions
𝑃𝑛 = 𝑂(𝑛𝑝𝑛 ),
(1.13)
𝑃𝑛 Δ𝑝𝑛 = 𝑂(𝑝𝑛 𝑝𝑛+1 )
(1.14)
then
Δ (𝑃𝑛 /𝑛𝑝𝑛 ) = 𝑂(1/𝑛).
(1.15)
∑
−1
Lemma 1.4. [4]. If (πœ†π‘› ) is a convex sequence such that
𝑛 πœ†π‘› is convergent,
then (πœ†π‘› ) is non-negative and decreasing and Δπœ†π‘› → 0 as 𝑛 → ∞.
2. Main Results
The coming result covers all the results mentioned in the references
Theorem 2.1. Let π‘˜ ≥ 1, and let the sequences (𝑝𝑛 ), (πœƒπ‘› ), (πœ†π‘› ) and (πœ‘π‘› ) where
πœƒπ‘› > 0, are all satisfying
βˆ£πœ†π‘›+1 ∣ = 𝑂 (βˆ£πœ†π‘› ∣) ,
(2.1)
(
)
∞
π‘˜
∑
𝑝𝑛
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1
βˆ£πœ†π‘› βˆ£π‘˜ βˆ£πœ‘π‘› βˆ£π‘˜ < ∞,
(2.2)
𝑃
𝑛
𝑛=1
∞
∑
π‘˜
π‘˜
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1 βˆ£πœ†π‘› ∣ ∣Δπœ‘π‘› ∣ < ∞,
(2.3)
𝑛=1
𝑛−1
∑
πœƒπ‘£1−1/π‘˜ βˆ£πœ‘π‘£ ∣
𝑣=1
and
π‘š+1
∑
𝑛=𝑣+1
(
πœƒπ‘› 𝑝 𝑛
𝑃𝑛
)π‘˜−1
(
𝑃𝑣
𝑝𝑣
)(1/π‘˜)−1
𝑝𝑛
=𝑂
𝑃𝑛 𝑃𝑛−1
∣Δπœ†π‘£ ∣ < ∞,
((
πœƒπ‘£ 𝑝 𝑣
𝑃𝑣
)π‘˜−1
(2.4)
1
𝑃𝑣
)
,
(2.5)
∞
∑
then the summability 𝑁 , 𝑝𝑛 , πœƒπ‘› π‘˜ of the series
𝐢𝑛 (𝑑)πœ†π‘› πœ‘π‘› at a point can be
𝑛=1
ensured by local property of f.
Proof. Let (𝑇𝑛 ) denote the (𝑁 , 𝑝𝑛 ) mean of the series
𝐢𝑛 (𝑑)πœ†π‘› πœ‘π‘› . Then, we
𝑛=1
have
𝑇𝑛 − 𝑇𝑛−1
∞
∑
=
=
=
=
𝑛
∑
𝑝𝑛
𝑃𝑣−1 πœ†π‘£ πœ‘π‘£ π‘Žπ‘£
𝑃𝑛 𝑃𝑛−1 𝑣=1
( 𝑣
)
( 𝑛
)
𝑛−1
∑ ∑
∑
𝑝𝑛
𝑝𝑛
π‘Žπ‘£ Δ (𝑃𝑣−1 πœ†π‘£ πœ‘π‘£ ) +
π‘Žπ‘£
πœ†π‘› πœ‘π‘›
𝑃𝑛 𝑃𝑛−1 𝑣=1 π‘Ÿ=1
𝑃
𝑛
𝑣=1
𝑛−1
∑
𝑝𝑛
𝑝𝑛
(−𝑠𝑣 𝑝𝑣 πœ†π‘£ πœ‘π‘£ + 𝑠𝑣 𝑃𝑣 Δπœ†π‘£ πœ‘π‘£ + 𝑠𝑣 𝑃𝑣 πœ†π‘£+1 Δπœ‘π‘£ ) + 𝑠𝑛 πœ†π‘› πœ‘π‘›
𝑃𝑛 𝑃𝑛−1 𝑣=1
𝑃𝑛
𝑇𝑛1 + 𝑇𝑛2 + 𝑇𝑛3 + 𝑇𝑛4 .
In order to complete the proof, by Minkowski′ s inequality, it is sufficient to show
that
∞
∑
π‘˜
< ∞,
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1 π‘‡π‘›π‘Ÿ
π‘Ÿ = 1, 2, 3, 4.
𝑛=1
30
W.T. SULAIMAN
Applying Holder’s inequality,
π‘š+1
∑
𝑛=2
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1 βˆ£π‘‡π‘›1 ∣
π‘˜
=
π‘š+1
∑
𝑛=2
π‘š+1
∑
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1 βˆ£π‘ π‘£ 𝑝𝑣 πœ†π‘£ πœ‘π‘£ ∣
π‘˜
(𝑛−1
)
∑ 𝑝𝑣 π‘˜−1
π‘˜
π‘˜
π‘˜
βˆ£π‘ 
∣
𝑝
βˆ£πœ†
∣
βˆ£πœ‘
∣
𝑣
𝑣
𝑣
𝑣
𝑃𝑛−1
𝑃𝑛−1
𝑛=2
𝑣=1
𝑣=1
( )π‘˜
π‘š
π‘š+1
∑
∑
π‘˜
π‘˜
1
= 𝑂(1)
𝑝𝑣 βˆ£πœ†π‘£ ∣ βˆ£πœ‘π‘£ ∣
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1 𝑃𝑝𝑛𝑛
𝑃𝑛−1
𝑣=1
𝑛=𝑣+1
(
)π‘˜−1
π‘š
∑
1
= 𝑂(1)
𝑝𝑣 βˆ£πœ†π‘£ βˆ£π‘˜ βˆ£πœ‘π‘£ βˆ£π‘˜ πœƒπ‘ƒπ‘£ 𝑝𝑣𝑣
𝑃𝑣
𝑣=1
( )π‘˜
π‘š
∑
π‘˜
π‘˜
= 𝑂(1)
πœƒπ‘£π‘˜−1 𝑃𝑝𝑣𝑣 βˆ£πœ†π‘£ ∣ βˆ£πœ‘π‘£ ∣ = 𝑂(1).
≤
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1
(
𝑝𝑛
𝑃𝑛
)π‘˜
𝑛−1
∑
1
𝑣=1
π‘š+1
∑
π‘˜
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1 βˆ£π‘‡π‘›2 ∣ =
𝑛=2
π‘š+1
∑
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1 βˆ£π‘ π‘£ 𝑃𝑣 Δπœ†π‘£ πœ‘π‘£ ∣
π‘˜
𝑛=2
≤
π‘š+1
∑
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1
𝑛=2
×
(𝑛−1
∑
(
𝑝𝑛
𝑃𝑛 𝑃𝑛−1
πœƒπ‘£1−1/π‘˜
βˆ£πœ‘π‘£ ∣
𝑣=1
π‘š
∑
(
)π‘˜ 𝑛−1
∑
βˆ£π‘ π‘£ ∣
π‘˜
π‘ƒπ‘£π‘˜
∣Δπœ†π‘£ ∣ βˆ£πœ‘π‘£ ∣ πœƒπ‘£(1−1/π‘˜)(1−π‘˜)
𝑣=1
𝑃𝑣
𝑝𝑣
)(1/π‘˜)−1
∣Δπœ†π‘£ ∣
(
𝑃𝑣
𝑝𝑣
)(π‘˜−1)(1−1/π‘˜)
)π‘˜−1
)(π‘˜−1)(1−1/π‘˜) π‘š+1
∑
)π‘˜
𝑝𝑛
= 𝑂(1)
𝑃𝑛 𝑃𝑛−1
𝑣=1
𝑛=𝑣+1
( )(π‘˜−1)(1−1/π‘˜) π‘š+1
( )π‘˜
π‘š
∑
∑
𝑝𝑛
1
𝑃𝑣
= 𝑂(1)
𝑃𝑣 ∣Δπœ†π‘£ ∣ βˆ£πœ‘π‘£ ∣ πœƒπ‘£(1−1/π‘˜)(1−π‘˜)
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1
𝑝
𝑃
𝑃
𝑣
𝑛
𝑛−1
𝑣=1
𝑛=𝑣+1
(
)
(
)π‘˜−1
π‘š
(π‘˜−1)(1−1/π‘˜)
∑
𝑃𝑣
πœƒπ‘£ 𝑝 𝑣
= 𝑂(1)
∣Δπœ†π‘£ ∣ βˆ£πœ‘π‘£ ∣ πœƒπ‘£(1−1/π‘˜)(1−π‘˜)
𝑝𝑣
𝑃𝑣
𝑣=1
(
)
π‘š
(1/π‘˜)−1
∑
𝑃𝑣
= 𝑂(1)
πœƒπ‘£1−1/π‘˜ βˆ£πœ‘π‘£ ∣
∣Δπœ†π‘£ ∣ = 𝑂(1).
𝑝𝑣
𝑣=1
π‘š+1
∑
π‘˜
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1 βˆ£π‘‡π‘›3 ∣ =
𝑛=2
π‘š+1
∑
π‘ƒπ‘£π‘˜
∣Δπœ†π‘£ ∣ βˆ£πœ‘π‘£ ∣ πœƒπ‘£(1−1/π‘˜)(1−π‘˜)
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1 βˆ£π‘ π‘£ 𝑃𝑣 πœ†π‘£+1 Δπœ‘π‘£ ∣
(
𝑃𝑣
𝑝𝑣
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1
(
π‘˜
𝑛=2
≤
π‘š+1
∑
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1
𝑛=2
= 𝑂(1)
(
𝑝𝑛
𝑃𝑛
π‘š
∑
π‘ƒπ‘£π‘˜
π‘π‘˜−1
𝑣=1 𝑣
π‘š
∑
π‘ƒπ‘£π‘˜
= 𝑂(1)
π‘π‘˜−1
𝑣=1 𝑣
= 𝑂(1)
π‘š
∑
𝑣=1
(𝑛−1
)π‘˜−1
∑ 𝑝𝑣
π‘ƒπ‘£π‘˜
π‘˜
π‘˜
βˆ£π‘ π‘£ ∣ π‘˜−1 βˆ£πœ†π‘£+1 ∣ ∣Δπœ‘π‘£ ∣
𝑃𝑛−1 𝑣=1
𝑃
𝑝𝑣
𝑣=1 𝑛−1
(
)
π‘š+1
π‘˜
∑
𝑝𝑛
1
βˆ£πœ†π‘£+1 βˆ£π‘˜ ∣Δπœ‘π‘£ βˆ£π‘˜
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1
𝑃𝑛
𝑃𝑛−1
𝑛=𝑣+1
(
)π‘˜−1
πœƒπ‘£ 𝑝 𝑣
1
π‘˜
π‘˜
βˆ£πœ†π‘£ ∣ ∣Δπœ‘π‘£ ∣
𝑃𝑣
𝑃𝑣
)π‘˜
1
π‘˜
𝑛−1
∑
π‘˜
π‘˜
πœƒπ‘£π‘˜−1 βˆ£πœ†π‘£ ∣ ∣Δπœ‘π‘£ ∣ = 𝑂(1).
ON LOCAL PROPERTY OF FACTORED FOURIER SERIES
π‘š+1
∑
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1
π‘˜
βˆ£π‘‡π‘›4 ∣ =
𝑛=2
=
π‘š+1
∑
𝑛=2
π‘š+1
∑
𝑛=2
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1
πœƒπ‘›π‘˜−1
π‘˜
𝑝𝑛
𝑠𝑛 πœ†π‘› πœ‘π‘› 𝑃𝑛
(
𝑝𝑛
𝑃𝑛
)π‘˜
π‘˜
31
π‘˜
βˆ£πœ†π‘› ∣ βˆ£πœ‘π‘› ∣ = 𝑂(1).
Since the behavior of the Fourier series concerns the convergence for a particular
value of π‘₯ depends on the behavior on the function in the immediate neighborhood
of this point only, this justifies (1.2) and valid. This completes the proof.
β–‘
Remark. The result of [7] follows from theorem 2.1 by putting
πœ‘π‘› = 𝑃𝑛 /𝑛𝑝𝑛 ,
Δπœ‘π‘› = 𝑂(1/𝑛).
Acknowledgments. The authors would like to thank the anonymous referee for
his/her comments that helped us improve this article.
References
[1] S. N. Bhatt, An aspect of local property of βˆ£π‘…, log 𝑛, 1∣ summability of the factored Fourier
series, Proc. Nat. Inst. India 26 (1968) 69–73.
[2] H. Bor, Local property of βˆ£π‘, 𝑝𝑛 βˆ£π‘˜ summability of the factored Fourier series, Bull. Inst. Math.
Acad. Sinica. 17 (1980) 165–170.
[3] H. Bor, On the local property of Fourier series. Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 1 (2009), 15–21.
[4] H. C. Chow, On the summability factors of infinite series, J. London Math. Soc. 16 (1941)
215-220.
[5] K. Matsumoto, Local property of the summability βˆ£π‘…, πœ†π‘› , 1∣ , Thoku Math. J. 2 (8) (1956)
114-124.
[6] K. N. Mishra, Multipliers for 𝑁 , 𝑝𝑛 summability of Fourier series, Bull. Inst. Math. Acad.
Sinica. 14 (1986) 431-438.
[7] M.A. Sarigöl, On the local property of the factored Fourier series, Bull. Math. Anal. Appl. 1
(2009), 49-54.
[8] W. T. Sulaiman, On some summability factors of infinite series, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. 115
(1992) 313-317.
waad Sulaiman, Department of Computer Engineering, College of engineering, University of Mosul, Iraq
E-mail address: waadsulaiman@hotmail.com
Download