Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Appendix B
PART I: Demographics
The demographic information tables contain actual percentages except where noted.
Table B1
What is your primary status at UW-Stout? (Question 1)
Primary status
n
%
Administrator
41
2.2
Non-degree-seeking student
30
1.6
Bachelor-degree-seeking student, entered UWStout as a first-year student
787
41.9
Bachelor-degree-seeking student, entered UWStout as a transfer student
322
17.2
Associate’s degree student
16
0.9
Master’s degree student
96
5.1
Doctoral degree student
0
0.0
Professional degree student
5
0.3
Limited term employee (LTE)
31
1.7
Classified staff – represented
118
6.3
Classified staff – non-represented
37
2.0
Instructor
16
0.9
Assistant professor
72
3.8
Associate professor
56
3.0
Professor
64
3.4
Instructional academic staff
46
2.5
Other academic staff
93
5.0
Post-doctoral researcher/fellow
0
0.0
Other
47
2.5
Note: There are no missing data for this question; all respondents were required to select an answer
133
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B2
What is your gender identity? (Question 26)
Gender
n
%
Woman
1086
57.9
Man
770
41.0
Transgender
5
0.3
Other
6
0.3
Missing
10
0.5
134
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B3
What is your race/ethnicity? (Mark all that apply) (Question 27)
Race/ethnicity
n
%
African
13
0.7
African American/Black
(not Latino/Hispanic)
12
0.6
Alaskan Native
2
0.1
Asian
52
2.8
Asian American
31
1.7
Southeast Asian
14
0.7
Caribbean/West Indian
5
0.3
1699
90.5
Indian Subcontinent
6
0.3
Latino(a)/Hispanic
26
1.4
Middle Eastern
5
0.3
Native American Indian
25
1.3
Pacific Islander/Hawaiian Native
7
0.4
Other
26
1.4
Caucasian/White
Note: Percentages may not sum to 100% due to multiple responses.
135
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B4
Which term best describes your sexual orientation?
(Question 28)
Sexual Identity
n
%
Bisexual
55
2.9
Gay
27
1.4
1677
89.3
Lesbian
20
1.1
Queer
5
0.3
Questioning
14
0.7
Other
25
1.3
Missing
54
2.9
Heterosexual
Table B5
What is your age? (Question 29)
Age
n
%
19 or under
330
17.6
20-21
441
23.5
22-25
315
16.8
26-32
186
9.9
33-42
161
8.6
43-51
168
9.0
52-60
198
10.5
61-69
59
3.1
70 and over
1
0.1
Missing
18
1.0
136
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B6
What is your current parental status? (Question 30)
Parental Status
n
%
No children
1308
70.8
Single parent
70
3.7
Pregnant
7
0.4
Co-parent with a partner/spouse
439
23.4
Other
24
1.3
Missing
29
1.5
n
%
Single
878
47.3
Partnered
342
18.4
6
0.3
575
30.6
Separated
7
0.4
Divorced
36
1.9
Remarried
4
0.2
Partner/spouse deceased
10
0.5
Missing
19
1.0
Table B7
What is your current relationship status? (Question 31)
Relationship Status
Partnered, in civil union
Married
137
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B8
Are you active military status or a veteran? (Question 32)
Active military/Veteran
n
%
Yes
96
5.1
No
1758
93.7
23
1.2
Missing
Table B9
Students Only: What is the highest level of education achieved by your parent(s)/legal guardian(s)?
(Question 33)
Parent /Legal
Guardian 1
n
%
Parent/Legal
Guardian 2
n
%
No high school
37
2.9
40
3.1
High school
288
22.5
315
24.6
Some college
169
13.2
176
13.8
Business/Technical
certificate/degree
136
10.6
132
10.3
Associate’s degree
102
8.0
99
7.7
Bachelor’s degree
296
23.1
300
23.5
Some graduate work
27
2.1
19
1.5
Master’s degree
144
11.3
115
9.0
Doctoral degree
31
2.4
14
1.1
Other professional degree
11
0.9
6
0.5
Unknown
4
0.3
9
0.7
Not applicable
7
0.5
16
1.3
Missing
27
2.1
38
3.0
Level of Education
Note: Table includes only those respondents who answered that they were students in Question 1 (n = 1279). 23 respondents
who answered “Other” in Question 1 were re-coded as students; they did not answer this question so are included in the “Missing” row.
138
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B10
Faculty/Staff Only: What is your highest completed level of education? (Question 34)
n
%
Did not complete high school
2
0.3
Completed high school
24
4.0
Some college
34
5.7
Some graduate work
14
2.3
Associate’s degree
20
3.3
Bachelor’s degree
89
14.9
Master’s degree
190
31.8
Doctoral degree/ Terminal
Professional degree
194
32.4
Business/Technical certificate/degree
11
1.8
Other professional certificate
7
1.2
Other
0
0.0
Missing
13
2.2
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were faculty or staff in Question 1 (n = 598)
139
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B11
Faculty/Staff Only: With which academic department/work unit/program are you primarily affiliated at this time?(Q 35)
Academic department/
work unit/program
n
%
Academic department/
work unit/program
n
%
Apparel & Communication
Technologies
Human Resources
2
0.3
12
2.0
Learning and Information Technology
22
3.7
Art & Design
20
3.3
Math, Statistics & Computer Science
19
3.2
ASLS Administration
17
2.8
Military Science
5
0.8
Athletics/Rec Complex/University
Recreation
13
2.2
Operations Management
20
3.3
Biology
12
2.0
Outreach Services and Research
Services
16
2.7
Planning, Assessment, Research and
Quality Office
5
0.8
Physical Education
2
0.3
Business
12
2.0
Physical Plant
19
3.2
Business & Financial Services
8
1.3
Physics
5
0.8
CAHSS Administration
3
0.5
Provost's Office
2
0.3
CEHHS Administration
3
0.5
Psychology
10
1.7
Chancellor's Office Admin
5
0.8
Rehabilitation & Counseling
5
0.8
Chemistry
4
0.7
School of Education
38
6.4
COM Administration
2
0.3
Social Science
7
1.2
Construction
7
1.2
Speech, Communication, Foreign
Language, Theatre & Music
12
2.0
Engineering & Technology
15
2.5
STEM Administration
5
0.8
English & Philosophy
20
3.3
STTI & related outreach
6
1.0
Enrollment Services
11
1.8
Student Life Services
17
2.8
Equal Opportunity & Affirmative
Action
0
0.0
Student Services
40
6.7
Food & Nutrition
8
1.3
SVRI
11
1.8
University Advancement
5
0.8
Graduate College / Honors / Intl.
Education
4
0.7
University Communications
1
0.2
Health, Safety and Risk Management
11
1.8
University Dining Services
7
1.2
Hospitality and Tourism
13
2.2
University Library
9
1.5
Housing & Residence Life
7
1.2
Academic and Student Affairs
Administration
24
4.0
Missing
69
11.5
Human Development & Family
Studies
8
1.3
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were faculty or staff in Question 1 (n = 598)
140
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B12
Students Only: With which academic department/work unit/program are you primarily affiliated at this time? (Question 35)
Academic department/work
unit/program
n
%
Academic department/work
unit/program
n
%
Apparel Design & Development
20
1.6
Information Technology Mgmt.
18
1.4
Applied Mathematics & Comp
Science
Management
39
3.0
21
1.6
Manufacturing Engineering
31
2.4
Applied Psychology
10
0.8
Marketing & Business Education
9
0.7
Applied Science
52
4.1
Marriage & Family Therapy
4
0.3
Applied Social Science
19
1.5
Mental Health Counseling
7
0.5
Art
130
10.2
Packaging
35
2.7
Art Education
12
0.9
Plastics Engineering
3
0.2
Business Administration
119
9.3
Property Management
4
0.3
Career & Technical Education
5
0.4
Psychology
52
4.1
Career, Technical Educ. & Trng
4
0.3
Retail Merchandising & Mgmt.
38
3.0
Cognitive Science
1
0.1
Risk Control
4
0.3
Computer Engineering
6
0.5
School Counseling
5
0.4
Construction
26
2.0
School Psychology
1
0.1
Dietetics
25
2.0
Science Education
11
0.9
Early Childhood Education
45
3.5
Service Management
1
0.1
Education
15
1.2
Special Education
11
0.9
Engineering Technology
63
4.9
Supply Chain Management
3
0.2
Family & Consumer Sciences Educ.
18
1.4
Sustainable Management
1
0.1
Family Studies & Human Dev
11
0.9
Technical Communication
10
0.8
Food & Nutritional Sciences
18
1.4
Food Systems & Technology
11
0.9
Technical & Professional
Communication
5
0.4
Game Design & Development
14
1.1
Technology Education
14
1.1
Golf Enterprise Management
8
0.6
Technology Education
9
0.7
Graphic Communications
Management
Technology Management
1
0.1
31
2.4
Technology & Science Education
2
0.2
Hotel, Restaurant & Tourism Mgmt
72
5.6
Training & Development
13
1.0
Human Devel. & Family Studies
73
5.7
Vocational Rehabilitation
42
3.3
Information & Comm. Tech.
11
0.9
Undecided
26
2.0
Missing
17
1.3
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were students in Question 1 (n = 1279)
141
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B13
Are you full-time or part-time in that primary status? (Question 36)
Gender
n
%
Full-time
1646
87.7
Part-time
204
10.9
Missing
27
1.4
Table B14
Do you have a disability that substantially affects a major life activity? (mark all that apply)
(Question 37)
Disability
n
%
1583
84.3
Mobility impairment
34
1.8
Sensory impairment
19
1.0
Learning disability
48
2.6
Mental health disorder
103
5.5
Chronic health disorder
28
1.5
Other
45
2.4
Missing
17
0.9
No disability
Note: Percentages do not sum to 100% due to multiple responses.
142
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B15
What is your citizenship status? (Question 38)
Citizenship status
n
%
U.S. born citizen
1759
93.7
U.S. citizen - naturalized
35
1.9
Dual citizenship
9
0.5
Permanent resident (immigrant)
19
1.0
Permanent resident (refugee)
3
0.2
International (F-1, J-1, or H1-B, or other visa)
30
1.6
Other
6
0.3
Missing
16
0.9
143
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B16
What is your religious or spiritual affiliation? (Question 39)
Spiritual Affiliation
n
%
Spiritual Affiliation
n
%
Animist
2
0.1
Native American Traditional
Practitioner
2
0.1
Anabaptist
0
0.0
Nondenominational Christian
144
7.7
Agnostic
84
4.5
Pagan
9
0.5
Atheist
90
4.8
Pentecostal
11
0.6
Baha’i
0
0.0
Presbyterian
18
1.0
Baptist
24
1.3
Quaker
1
0.1
Buddhist
7
0.4
387
20.6
Eastern Orthodox
5
0.3
Seventh Day Adventist
2
0.1
Episcopalian
14
0.7
Shamanist
12
0.6
Hindu
18
1.0
Sikh
0
0.0
Jehovah’s Witness
2
0.1
Unitarian Universalist
10
0.5
Jewish
10
0.5
United Church of Christ
51
2.7
Latter Day Saints (Mormon)
3
0.2
Wiccan
5
0.3
446
23.8
Mennonite
1
0.1
Spiritual, but no religious
affiliation
140
7.6
Methodist
62
3.3
No affiliation
212
11.3
Moravian
0
0.0
Other
58
3.1
Muslim
6
0.3
Missing
41
2.2
Roman Catholic
Lutheran
144
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B17
Faculty/Staff Only: How long have you been employed by UW-Stout? (Question 40)
Time
n
%
1 year or less
64
10.7
2-4 years
144
24.1
5-10 years
147
24.6
11-15 years
72
12.0
16-20 years
41
6.9
21-30 years
84
14.0
31+ years
28
4.7
Missing
18
3.0
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were faculty or staff in Question 1 (n = 598)
Table B18
Faculty/Staff Only: Have you worked at more than one UW System institution/System Administration?
(Question 41)
Worked at more than
one UW Institution
n
%
Yes
96
16.1
No
481
80.4
Missing
21
3.5
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were employees in Question 28 (n = 598).
145
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B19
Faculty/Staff Only: Please indicate where you have worked and for how many years (Question 42)
1-2 years
n
3-4 years
n
5-6 years
n
7-8 years
n
9-10 years
n
UW – Eau Claire
15
8
6
2
6
UW - Green Bay
2
0
0
1
1
UW – La Crosse
2
0
0
0
1
UW - Madison
7
6
2
2
0
UW - Milwaukee
2
2
0
0
1
UW - Oshkosh
1
0
0
0
1
UW - Parkside
1
0
0
0
0
UW - Platteville
1
1
1
0
0
UW - River Falls
4
4
0
0
0
UW - Stevens Point
2
0
1
0
1
UW - Stout
4
9
4
5
23
UW - Superior
0
1
0
0
0
UW - Whitewater
3
0
0
0
1
UW - Colleges
4
2
0
0
2
UW System Administration
1
0
0
0
0
Institution
Note: Table includes only those employees who indicated they have worked at more than one UW System Institution in Question 41.
Note: Due to multiple responses, calculating percentages is not possible and there were no “missing” responses.
146
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B20
Students Only: Where are you in your college career? (Question 43)
Place in college career
n
%
Non-degree seeking student
5
0.4
First year undergraduate student
262
20.5
Second year undergraduate student
235
18.4
Third year undergraduate student
276
21.6
Fourth year undergraduate student
245
19.2
Fifth year undergraduate student
119
9.3
Master’s degree candidate
87
6.8
Doctoral degree student
0
0.0
Professional degree student
2
0.2
Other
19
1.5
Missing
29
2.3
Note: Table includes only those respondents who answered that they were students in Question 1 (n = 1279). 23 respondents
who answered “Other” in Question 1 were re-coded as students; they did not answer this question so are included in the “Missing” row.
147
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B21
Students Only: are you currently dependent (family/guardian is assisting with your living/educational
expenses) or independent (you are the sole provider for your living/educational expenses)?
(Question 44)
Status
n
%
Dependent
779
60.9
Independent
469
36.7
Missing
31
2.4
Note: Table includes only those respondents who answered that they were students in Question 1 (n = 1279). 23 respondents
who answered “Other” in Question 1 were re-coded as students; they did not answer this question so are included in the “Missing” row.
Table B22
Students Only: What is your best estimate of your family’s yearly income (if partnered, married, or a dependent
student) or your yearly income (if single or an independent student)? (Question 45)
Income
n
%
Below $29,999
291
22.8
$30,000-$39, 999
93
7.3
$40,000-$49,999
75
5.9
$50,000-$59,999
98
7.7
$60,000 - $69,999
95
7.4
$70,000-$79,999
85
6.6
$80,000 - $89,999
72
5.6
$90,000 - $99,999
62
4.8
$100,000 - $149,999
135
10.6
$150,000 - $199,999
50
3.9
$200,000 - $249,999
19
1.5
$250,000 and above
17
1.3
Don’t know
151
11.8
Missing
35
2.7
Note: Table includes only those respondents who answered that they were students in Question 1 (n = 1279). 23 respondents
who answered “Other” in Question 1 were re-coded as students; they did not answer this question so are included in the “Missing” row.
148
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B23
Students Only: Where do you live? (Question 46)
Residence
n
%
509
39.8
Private residence hall
4
0.3
University housing apartment
10
0.8
Fraternity/sorority housing
6
0.5
Off-campus apartment/house
560
43.8
With partner/spouse/children
90
7.0
With parent(s)/family/relative(s)
57
4.5
Other
14
1.1
Missing
29
2.3
University housing residence hall
Note: Table includes only those respondents who answered that they were students in Question 1 (n = 1279). 23 respondents
who answered “Other” in Question 1 were re-coded as students; they did not answer this question so are included in the “Missing” row.
Table B24
Students Only: Are you working 20 or more hours per week? (Question 47)
Working more than
20 hrs a week
n
%
Yes
422
33.0
No
827
64.7
Missing
30
2.3
Note: Table includes only those respondents who answered that they were students in Question 1 (n = 1279). 23 respondents
who answered “Other” in Question 1 were re-coded as students; they did not answer this question so are included in the “Missing” row.
149
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B25
In what environment did you grow up? (Question 48)
Environment
n
%
Farm/ranch
221
11.8
Rural, non-farm
311
16.6
Small-town
591
31.5
Suburban
442
23.5
Urban
177
9.4
International
29
1.5
Combination
85
4.5
Other
9
0.5
Missing
12
0.6
150
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
PART II: Findings
**The tables in this section all contain valid percentages except where noted**
Table B26
Overall, how comfortable are you with the climate at UW-Stout? (Question 1)
Comfort
n
%
Very Comfortable
383
20.4
Comfortable
1010
53.9
Neither comfortable nor
uncomfortable
298
15.9
Uncomfortable
146
7.8
Very Uncomfortable
38
2.0
Table B27
Overall, how comfortable are you with the climate in your department/work unit? (Question 2)
Comfort
n
%
Very Comfortable
521
27.9
Comfortable
844
45.2
Neither comfortable nor
uncomfortable
238
12.7
Uncomfortable
112
6.0
Very Uncomfortable
49
2.6
Not applicable
104
5.6
151
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B28
Faculty/Students Only: Overall, how comfortable are you with the climate in your classes? (Question 5)
Comfort
n
%
Very Comfortable
365
24.6
Comfortable
836
56.3
Neither comfortable nor
uncomfortable
202
13.6
Uncomfortable
58
3.9
Very Uncomfortable
10
0.7
Not applicable
13
0.9
Note: Table includes only those respondents who answered that they were faculty or students in Question 1 (n =1491).
Table B29
Faculty/Staff Only: How satisfied are you with…
(Question 5)
Highly Satisfied
n
%
Satisfied
n
%
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
n
%
Dissatisfied
n
%
Highly
dissatisfied
n
%
Your job
146
24.9
295
50.3
59
10.1
71
12.1
16
2.7
The way your career
has progressed
117
20.3
243
42.2
93
16.1
92
16.0
31
5.4
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were faculty/staff in Question 1 (n = 598).
152
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B30
Students Only: how satisfied are you with…
(Question 6)
Highly Satisfied
n
%
Your education
223
17.9
Satisfied
n
%
823
65.9
Neither satisfied
nor dissatisfied
n
%
143
11.5
Dissatisfied
n
%
Highly
dissatisfied
n
%
56
3
4.5
0.2
Note: Table includes only those respondents who answered that they were students in Question 1 (n = 1279). 23 respondents
who answered “Other” in Question 1 were re-coded as students; they did not answer this question so are included in the “Missing” row.
Table B31
Have you ever seriously considered leaving UW-Stout? (Question 7)
Considered leaving
n
%
Yes
888
47.6
No
978
52.4
Table B32
Within the past two years, have you personally experienced any exclusionary (e.g., shunned, ignored) intimidating,
offensive, and/or hostile conduct (harassing behavior) that has interfered with your ability to work or learn at UWStout? (Question 8)
Experienced
n
%
Yes
385
20.6
No
1483
79.4
153
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B33
What do you believe this conduct was based upon? (Question 9)
Based on:
n
%
My institutional status
101
26.2
My gender
87
22.6
My age
81
21.0
My educational level
54
14.0
My ethnicity
32
8.3
My physical characteristics
31
8.1
My religious/spiritual status
30
7.8
My political views
27
7.0
My race
26
6.8
My sexual orientation
21
5.5
My country of origin
20
5.2
My psychological disability
19
4.9
My socioeconomic status
19
4.9
My English language proficiency/accent
18
4.7
My gender expression
15
3.9
My gender identity
14
3.6
My parental status (e.g., having children)
12
3.1
My learning disability
9
2.3
My physical disability
8
2.1
My immigrant status
6
1.6
My military/veteran status
3
0.8
151
39.2
Other
Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 385).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
154
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B34
How did you experience this conduct? (Question 10)
Form
n
%
I was deliberately ignored or excluded
177
46.0
Intimidation/bullying
141
36.6
Stares
68
17.7
Target of derogatory remarks
60
15.6
I felt isolated or left out when
working in groups
60
15.6
Derogatory written comments
46
11.9
I received a low performance evaluation
43
11.2
I feared for my physical safety
37
9.6
I felt isolated or left out because of my
identity
35
9.1
Derogatory/unsolicited e-mail, text
message, Facebook post, Twitter post
32
8.3
I feared getting a poor grade because of
hostile classroom environment
28
7.3
Assumption that I was admitted/hired/
promoted due to my identity
19
4.9
I was singled out as the “resident
authority” regarding their identity
16
4.2
Derogatory phone calls
15
3.9
Threats of physical violence
15
3.9
Graffiti/vandalism
11
2.9
Victim of a crime
10
2.6
Target of physical violence
8
2.1
I feared for my family’s safety
8
2.1
Target of racial/ethnic profiling
7
1.8
Other
84
21.8
Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 385).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
155
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B35
Where did this conduct occur? (Question 11)
Location
n
%
While working at a campus job
131
34.0
In a class
102
26.5
In a meeting with a group of people
96
24.9
Campus office
75
19.5
University housing residence hall
54
14.0
In a meeting with one other person
52
13.5
While walking on campus
48
12.5
Faculty office
47
12.2
Public space on campus
42
10.9
Campus event
24
6.2
Other off-campus location
23
6.0
Athletic facilities
14
3.6
Off-campus housing
13
3.4
University dining facility
12
3.1
Private residence hall
7
1.8
Fraternity/sorority house
4
1.0
University housing apartment
2
0.5
Other
34
8.8
Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 385).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
156
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B36
Who was the source of this conduct? (Question 12)
Source
n
%
Faculty member
111
28.8
Undergraduate student
98
25.5
Colleague
96
24.9
Staff member
62
16.1
Administrator
57
14.8
Academic administrator (dean, associate
dean, assistant dean, etc.)
41
10.6
Supervisor
34
8.8
Department chair
29
7.5
Don’t know source
17
4.4
Community member
13
3.4
Campus media
12
3.1
Center director
12
3.1
Campus visitor(s)
11
2.9
Faculty advisor
11
2.9
Person that I supervise
11
2.9
Graduate student
8
2.1
Campus security
6
1.6
Teaching assistant
4
1.0
Research assistant
0
0.0
Other
43
11.2
Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 385).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
157
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B37
Please describe your reactions to experiencing this conduct? (Question 13)
Reactions
Was angry
n
212
%
55.1
Felt embarrassed
149
38.7
Avoided the harasser
141
36.6
Told a friend
137
35.6
Ignored it
103
26.8
Made an official complaint to a campus
employee/official
79
20.5
Was afraid
70
18.2
Didn’t know who to go to
68
17.7
Didn’t report it for fear of retaliation
64
16.6
Confronted the harasser at the time
55
14.3
Did report it but my complaint was not taken
seriously
46
11.9
Felt somehow responsible
44
11.4
Didn’t report it for fear my complaint would not
be taken seriously
42
10.9
Left the situation immediately
36
9.4
Confronted the harasser later
29
7.5
Sought support from counseling/advocacy
services
21
5.5
Didn’t affect me at the time
14
3.6
Other
41
10.6
Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 385).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
158
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B38
I have been touched in a sexual manner that has made me feel uncomfortable or fearful at UW-Stout.
(Question 15)
Touched in a sexual manner
that made me uncomfortable
n
%
Never
1725
92.2
Rarely
113
6.0
Sometimes
28
1.5
Often
4
0.2
Very often
1
0.1
Table B39
There are times when I fear being the object of sexual harassment at UW-Stout.
(Question 16)
Fear being the object of sexual
harassment
n
%
Never
1589
85.0
Rarely
210
11.2
Sometimes
65
3.5
Often
3
0.2
Very often
3
0.2
159
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B40
Who is the source of this fear? (Question 17)
Source
n
%
Student
140
49.8
Stranger
102
36.3
Acquaintance
32
11.4
Friend
29
10.3
Co-worker
23
8.2
Faculty member
18
6.4
Staff member
18
6.4
Administrator
12
4.3
Department chair
5
1.8
Teaching Assistant
4
1.4
Partner/spouse
3
1.1
Supervisor
3
1.1
Academic advisor
2
0.7
Person that I supervise
2
0.7
Faculty advisor
1
0.4
Post-doctoral researcher/fellow
1
0.4
Research assistant
1
0.4
Other
13
4.6
Note: Only answered by respondents who fear sexual harassment (n = 281).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
160
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B41
Have you ever been a victim of sexual assault while at this campus? (Question 18)
Sexually assaulted
n
%
Yes
33
1.8
No
1837
97.9
7
0.4
Missing
161
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B42
Who was the offender(s)? Mark all that apply. (Question 19)
Source
Student
n
14
%
42.4
Stranger
11
33.3
Friend
6
18.2
Acquaintance
5
15.2
Partner/Spouse
2
6.1
Academic Advisor
0
0.0
Administrator
0
0.0
Department Chair
0
0.0
Co-worker
0
0.0
Faculty advisor
0
0.0
Faculty member
0
0.0
Person that I supervise
0
0.0
Post-doctoral researcher/fellow
0
0.0
Research assistant
0
0.0
Staff member
0
0.0
Supervisor
0
0.0
Teaching Assistant
0
0.0
Other
2
6.1
Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced sexual assault (n = 33).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
162
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B43
Where did the incident(s) occur? (Question 20)
Location
n
%
Off-campus
18
54.5
On-campus
10
30.3
Other location
2
6.1
Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced sexual assault (n = 33).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
Table B44
Please describe your response to experiencing the incident(s).
(Question 21)
Response
n
%
Told a friend
20
60.6
Did nothing
9
27.3
Told a family member
7
21.2
Sought support from a campus
resource/counseling center(s)
5
15.2
Sought medical services
5
15.2
Contacted my local law enforcement official
5
15.2
Sought support from off-campus
hotline/advocacy service
3
9.1
Sought support from a faculty member
3
9.1
Sought information on-line
3
9.1
Contacted Campus Police/Security
2
6.1
Sought support from a staff person
2
6.1
Sought support from a spiritual advisor
1
3.0
Contacted my Union
0
0.0
Reported the incident and it was ignored
0
0.0
Other
1
3.0
Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced sexual assault (n = 33).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
163
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B45
Faculty/Staff Only: As a faculty/staff member… (Question 23)
Issues
Strongly agree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Neither agree
nor disagree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly
disagree
n
%
Not applicable
n
%
I am reluctant to bring up issues that concern me for fear that
it will affect my performance evaluation or tenure decision
78
13.2
120
20.3
97
16.4
140
23.7
131
22.2
24
4.1
I am comfortable asking questions about performance
expectations with my supervisor
135
22.8
296
50.1
77
13.0
42
7.1
31
5.2
10
1.7
My colleagues/co-workers expect me to represent “the point
of view” of my identity
26
4.4
92
15.6
227
38.6
91
15.5
78
13.3
74
12.6
My colleagues/co-workers have lower expectations of me
than other faculty/staff
7
1.2
30
5.1
131
22.2
187
31.7
212
25.9
23
3.9
My colleagues/co-workers have higher expectations of me
than other faculty/staff
46
7.8
136
23.2
175
29.8
135
23.0
73
12.4
22
3.7
I constantly feel under scrutiny by my colleagues
43
7.3
85
14.4
136
23.1
186
31.6
123
20.9
16
2.7
My research/professional interests are valued by my
colleagues
46
7.8
212
36.1
128
21.8
72
12.3
37
6.3
92
15.7
I feel pressured to change my research agenda to make
tenure/be promoted
21
3.6
45
7.7
99
16.9
75
12.8
62
10.6
285
48.6
I am reluctant to take leave that I am entitled to for fear that
it may affect my career
18
3.1
78
13.3
110
18.8
131
22.4
109
18.6
139
23.8
I have to work harder than I believe my colleagues do in
order to be perceived as legitimate
56
9.5
111
18.8
129
21.9
149
25.3
122
20.7
23
3.9
I have to work harder than I believe my colleagues do in
order to achieve the same recognition/rewards
69
11.8
109
18.6
106
18.1
157
26.7
117
19.9
29
4.9
164
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Issues
Strongly agree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Neither agree
nor disagree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly
disagree
n
%
Not applicable
n
%
There are many unwritten rules concerning how one is
expected to interact with colleagues in my work unit
82
13.9
131
22.2
140
23.7
132
22.3
82
13.9
24
4.1
Others seem to find it easier that I do to “fit in.”
26
4.4
93
15.7
126
21.3
183
31.0
142
24.0
21
3.6
I feel pressured to change my methods of teaching to achieve
tenure/be promoted
31
5.3
36
6.1
87
14.7
80
13.6
71
12.0
285
48.3
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were faculty or staff in Question 1 (n = 598).
165
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B46
Faculty/Staff Only: As a faculty/staff member… (Question 24)
Issues
Strongly agree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Neither agree
nor disagree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly
disagree
n
%
Not applicable
n
%
I am usually satisfied with the way in which I am able
to balance my professional and personal life
74
12.4
299
50.3
62
10.4
96
16.1
56
9.4
8
1.3
I find that UW-Stout is supportive of my family leave
51
8.7
181
30.7
124
21.1
38
6.5
20
3.4
175
29.7
I have to miss out on important things in my personal
life because of professional commitments
46
7.7
150
25.2
117
19.7
188
31.6
71
11.9
23
3.9
I feel that faculty/staff who have children are
considered less committed to their careers
20
3.4
76
12.9
126
21.3
206
34.9
119
20.1
44
7.4
I feel that faculty/staff who do not have children are
often burdened with work responsibilities
30
5.1
67
11.3
159
26.9
188
31.8
97
16.4
50
8.5
I find that UW-Stout is unfair in providing health
benefits to unmarried, co-parenting families
14
2.4
25
4.2
182
30.8
109
18.5
121
20.5
139
23.6
I have equitable access to domestic partner benefits
33
5.6
69
11.7
107
18.2
8
1.4
11
1.9
361
61.3
I have equitable access to tuition reimbursement
20
3.4
71
12.0
135
22.9
55
9.3
81
13.7
228
38.6
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were faculty or staff in Question 1 (n = 598).
166
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B47
Faculty/Staff Only: Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements about the resources available to you: (Question 25)
Agree
n
%
Neither agree nor
disagree
n
%
Issues
Strongly agree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly disagree
n
%
Don’t know
n
%
Not applicable
n
%
I have colleagues or peers who give me career advice
or guidance when I need it
106
18.1
314
53.6
71
12.1
39
6.7
15
2.6
5
0.9
36
6.1
I have support from decision makers/colleagues who
support my career advancement
94
16.1
255
43.7
89
15.3
63
10.8
31
5.3
12
2.1
39
6.7
I have the equipment and supplies I need to adequately
perform my work
111
18.9
306
52.2
49
8.4
75
12.8
35
6.0
0
0.0
10
1.7
I receive regular maintenance/upgrades of my
equipment compared to my colleagues
83
14.2
226
38.6
140
23.9
67
11.4
35
6.0
8
1.4
27
4.6
I have equitable work space in terms of quantity and
quality as compared to my colleagues
114
19.5
298
50.9
68
11.6
55
9.4
29
5.0
2
0.3
19
3.2
I have equitable laboratory space in terms of quantity
and quality as compared to my colleagues
28
4.8
135
23.0
68
11.6
30
5.1
21
3.6
3
0.5
301
51.4
I have equitable access to shared space as my
colleagues
103
17.6
318
54.3
61
10.4
29
4.9
19
3.2
2
0.3
54
9.2
I have equitable access to shared equipment/technology
for research support as my colleagues
72
12.3
204
34.9
75
12.8
26
4.5
17
2.9
5
0.9
185
31.7
I have equitable teaching support (e.g., materials,
technology, TAs)
39
6.7
166
28.5
61
10.5
37
6.4
24
4.1
3
0.5
252
43.3
I feel that my compensation is equitable to my peers
with a similar level of experience
26
4.5
159
27.4
80
13.8
122
21.0
143
24.6
26
4.5
25
4.3
I have equitable access to health benefits
179
30.9
294
50.7
48
8.3
15
2.6
9
1.6
4
0.7
31
5.3
I feel that my supervisor/manager is receptive to
accommodating a telecommuting arrangement
36
6.2
115
19.7
94
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were faculty or staff in Question 1 (n = 598)
16.1
62
10.6
64
10.9
45
7.7
169
28.9
167
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B48
Within the past two years, have you observed any conduct directed toward a person or group of people on campus
that you believe has created an exclusionary (e.g., shunned, ignored), intimidating, offensive and/or or hostile
(harassing) working or learning environment? (Question 49)
Observed
n
%
Yes
552
29.6
No
1312
70.4
168
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B49
What do you believe were the bases for this conduct? (Question 50)
Based on:
n
%
Sexual orientation
259
46.9
Race
175
31.7
Ethnicity
156
28.3
Gender
147
26.6
Gender expression
115
20.8
Gender identity
103
18.7
Age
85
15.4
Country of origin
82
14.9
Educational level
72
13.0
Political views
69
12.5
Religion/spiritual status
69
12.5
Physical characteristics
64
11.6
English language proficiency/accent
58
10.5
Institutional status
54
9.8
Learning disability
48
8.7
Physical disability
47
8.5
Psychological disability (e.g. posttraumatic stress disorder, depression,
anxiety)
46
8.3
Immigrant status
39
7.1
Socioeconomic status
38
6.9
Parental status (e.g., having children)
28
5.1
Military/veteran status
12
2.2
Other
86
15.6
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed harassment (n = 552).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
169
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B50
What forms of conduct have you observed or personally been made aware of? (Question 51)
Form
n
%
Derogatory remarks
183
33.2
Deliberately ignored or excluded
167
30.3
Racial/ethnic profiling
141
25.5
Stares
141
25.5
Intimidation/bullying
140
25.4
Derogatory written comments
136
24.6
Someone isolated or left out because of
their identity
107
19.4
Graffiti
101
18.3
Threats of physical violence
92
16.7
Someone receiving a low performance
evaluation
81
14.7
Derogatory/unsolicited e-mails, text
message, Facebook post, Twitter post
75
13.6
Someone fearing for their physical safety
66
12.0
Someone isolated or left out when
working in groups
65
11.8
Assumption that someone was admitted
or hired because of their identity
59
10.7
Physical violence
56
10.1
Someone singled out as the “resident
authority” regarding their identity
51
9.2
Derogatory phone calls
43
7.8
Someone receiving a poor grade because
of hostile classroom environment
40
7.2
Victim of a crime
37
6.7
Someone isolated or left out because of
their socioeconomic status
32
5.8
Someone fearing for their family’s safety
7
1.3
Other
39
7.1
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed harassment (n = 552).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
170
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B51
Referring to your answer, "Someone being racially/ethnically profiled" in question #51, where did this conduct
occur? (Question 51a)
Location
n
%
While walking on campus
65
46.1
Public space on campus
48
34.0
In a class
43
30.5
University housing residence hall
42
29.8
Off- campus location
36
25.5
While working at a campus job
26
18.4
Off-campus housing
16
11.3
Campus event
15
10.6
In a meeting with a group of people
15
10.6
Athletic facilities
13
9.2
University dining facility
10
7.1
Private residence hall
9
6.4
Campus office
9
6.4
Fraternity/sorority house
7
5.0
Faculty office
7
5.0
In a meeting with one other person
7
5.0
University housing apartment
5
3.5
Other
5
3.5
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone being racially/ethnically profiled (n = 141).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
171
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B52
Referring to your answer, "Graffiti (e.g., event advertisements removed or defaced)" in question #51, where did this
conduct occur? (Question 51b)
Location
n
%
University housing residence hall
54
53.5
Public space on campus
29
28.7
While walking on campus
25
24.8
Off- campus location
20
19.8
University dining facility
11
10.9
In a class
10
9.9
While working at a campus job
8
7.9
University housing apartment
6
5.9
Campus event
6
5.9
Off-campus housing
6
5.9
Fraternity/sorority house
4
4.0
Faculty office
4
4.0
Athletic facilities
4
4.0
Private residence hall
3
3.0
In a meeting with one other person
3
3.0
Campus office
2
2.0
In a meeting with a group of people
2
2.0
Other
5
5.0
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of graffiti (n = 101).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
172
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B53
Referring to your answer, "Someone receiving derogatory written comments because of his/her identity" in question
#51, where did this conduct occur? (Question 51c)
Location
n
%
University housing residence hall
72
52.9
While walking on campus
27
19.9
Public space on campus
26
19.1
Off- campus location
24
17.6
While working at a campus job
22
16.2
In a class
17
12.5
Campus event
14
10.3
In a meeting with a group of people
14
10.3
Private residence hall
11
8.1
University dining facility
11
8.1
Fraternity/sorority house
10
7.4
University housing apartment
9
6.6
Off-campus housing
9
6.6
In a meeting with one other person
8
5.9
Athletic facilities
7
5.1
Campus office
6
4.4
Faculty office
6
4.4
Other
12
8.8
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone receiving derogatory written comments (n = 136).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
173
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B54
Referring to your answer, "Someone receiving derogatory phone calls because of his/her identity" in question #51,
where did this conduct occur? (Question 51d)
Location
n
%
University housing residence hall
16
37.2
Off- campus location
8
18.6
In a meeting with a group of people
7
16.3
While working at a campus job
6
14.0
In a class
5
11.6
While walking on campus
5
11.6
In a meeting with one other person
5
11.6
Off-campus housing
5
11.6
University housing apartment
4
9.3
Campus office
4
9.3
Campus event
4
9.3
Public space on campus
4
9.3
Private residence hall
3
7.0
University dining facility
3
7.0
Faculty office
3
7.0
Fraternity/sorority house
2
4.7
Athletic facilities
1
2.3
Other
3
7.0
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone receiving derogatory phone calls (n = 43).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
174
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B55
Referring to your answer, "Someone receiving threats of physical violence" in question #51, where did this conduct
occur? (Question 51e)
Location
n
%
University housing residence hall
35
38.0
While walking on campus
26
28.3
Off- campus location
24
26.1
Public space on campus
16
17.4
While working at a campus job
10
10.9
Campus event
7
7.6
Private residence hall
5
5.4
University housing apartment
5
5.4
Fraternity/sorority house
5
5.4
Off-campus housing
5
5.4
Athletic facilities
5
5.4
In a class
4
4.3
Campus office
4
4.3
In a meeting with one other person
4
4.3
In a meeting with a group of people
4
4.3
University dining facility
3
3.3
Faculty office
0
0.0
Other
7
7.6
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone receiving threats of physical violence (n = 92).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
175
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B56
Referring to your answer, "Someone receiving derogatory/unsolicited e-mails, text messages, Facebook posts,
Twitter posts because of his/her identity" in question #51, where did this conduct occur? (Question 51f)
Location
n
%
University housing residence hall
28
37.3
In a class
15
20.0
While working at a campus job
15
20.0
Public space on campus
13
17.3
Off- campus location
12
16.0
Campus office
10
13.3
While walking on campus
9
12.0
Faculty office
7
9.3
Campus event
5
6.7
Private residence hall
4
5.3
In a meeting with a group of people
4
5.3
Off-campus housing
4
5.3
University housing apartment
3
4.0
Fraternity/sorority house
3
4.0
University dining facility
3
4.0
In a meeting with one other person
3
4.0
Athletic facilities
1
1.3
Other
12
16.0
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone receiving derogatory/unsolicited emails (n = 75).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
176
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B57
Referring to your answer, "Someone being the target of physical violence because of his/her identity" in question
#51, where did this conduct occur? (Question 51g)
Location
n
%
Off- campus location
27
48.2
University housing residence hall
18
32.1
While walking on campus
10
17.9
Public space on campus
8
14.3
While working at a campus job
6
10.7
Off-campus housing
6
10.7
University housing apartment
5
8.9
Campus event
5
8.9
University dining facility
4
7.1
Athletic facilities
4
7.1
In a class
3
5.4
Private residence hall
3
5.4
Fraternity/sorority house
2
3.6
Campus office
1
1.8
Faculty office
1
1.8
In a meeting with one other person
1
1.8
In a meeting with a group of people
1
1.8
Other
1
1.8
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone being a target of physical violence (n = 56).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
177
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B58
Referring to your answer, "Someone being stared at because of his/her identity" in question #51, where did this
conduct occur? (Question 51h)
Location
n
%
While walking on campus
76
53.9
In a class
69
48.9
Public space on campus
47
33.3
University housing residence hall
41
29.1
Off- campus location
37
26.2
University dining facility
36
25.5
Campus event
32
22.7
While working at a campus job
22
15.6
Athletic facilities
19
13.5
In a meeting with a group of people
17
12.1
Campus office
15
10.6
Fraternity/sorority house
10
7.1
Faculty office
9
6.4
In a meeting with one other person
9
6.4
Private residence hall
8
5.7
University housing apartment
8
5.7
Off-campus housing
7
5.0
Other
5
3.5
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone being stared at (n = 141).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
178
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B59
Referring to your answer, "Someone being deliberately ignored or excluded because of his/her identity" in question
#51, where did this conduct occur? (Question 51i)
Location
n
%
In a class
66
39.5
While working at a campus job
45
26.9
In a meeting with a group of people
38
22.8
Off- campus location
36
21.6
University housing residence hall
34
20.4
While walking on campus
32
19.2
Public space on campus
26
15.6
Campus office
25
15.0
Campus event
22
13.2
University dining facility
15
9.0
In a meeting with one other person
14
8.4
Faculty office
13
7.8
Off-campus housing
10
6.0
Athletic facilities
10
6.0
Private residence hall
7
4.2
Fraternity/sorority house
7
4.2
University housing apartment
4
2.4
Other
3
1.8
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone being deliberately ignored or excluded (n = 167).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
179
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B60
Referring to your answer, "Someone being the target of derogatory remarks because of his/her identity" in question
#51, where did this conduct occur? (Question 51j)
Location
n
%
University housing residence hall
60
52.8
While walking on campus
52
28.4
In a class
46
25.1
Off- campus location
45
25.6
Public space on campus
40
21.9
While working at a campus job
33
18.0
Campus office
24
13.1
Campus event
24
13.1
In a meeting with a group of people
21
11.5
University dining facility
14
7.7
Faculty office
13
7.1
Off-campus housing
13
7.1
In a meeting with one other person
11
6.0
Athletic facilities
9
4.9
Private residence hall
5
2.7
University housing apartment
4
2.2
Fraternity/sorority house
4
2.2
Other
7
3.8
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone being the target of derogatory remarks (n = 183).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
180
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B61
Referring to your answer, "Someone being intimidated/bullied because of his/her identity" in question #51, where
did this conduct occur? (Question 51k)
Location
n
%
University housing residence hall
48
34.3
Off- campus location
39
27.9
While working at a campus job
35
25.0
While walking on campus
31
22.1
In a class
29
20.7
Public space on campus
28
20.0
Campus office
20
14.3
In a meeting with a group of people
19
13.6
Campus event
15
10.7
Faculty office
13
9.3
In a meeting with one other person
11
7.9
Off-campus housing
9
6.4
Athletic facilities
7
5.0
University dining facility
6
4.3
Fraternity/sorority house
5
3.6
Private residence hall
4
2.9
University housing apartment
1
0.7
Other
3
2.1
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone being intimidated or bullied (n = 140).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
181
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B62
Referring to your answer, "Someone fearing for their physical safety because of his/her identity" in question #51,
where did this conduct occur? (Question 51l)
Location
n
%
University housing residence hall
26
39.4
While walking on campus
23
34.8
Off- campus location
23
34.8
While working at a campus job
9
13.6
Off-campus housing
9
13.6
Public space on campus
8
12.1
Campus event
7
10.6
In a class
6
9.1
Private residence hall
4
6.1
University dining facility
4
6.1
Faculty office
4
6.1
University housing apartment
3
4.5
Campus office
3
4.5
In a meeting with a group of people
3
4.5
Athletic facilities
2
3.0
Fraternity/sorority house
1
1.5
In a meeting with one other person
1
1.5
Other
2
3.0
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone fearing for their safety (n = 66).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
182
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B63
Referring to your answer, "Someone fearing for their family’s safety because of his/her identity" in question #51,
where did this conduct occur? (Question 51m)
Location
n
%
While working at a campus job
2
28.6
While walking on campus
2
28.6
In a class
1
14.3
University housing residence hall
1
14.3
Campus office
1
14.3
In a meeting with one other person
1
14.3
Off- campus location
1
14.3
Private residence hall
0
0.0
University housing apartment
0
0.0
Fraternity/sorority house
0
0.0
University dining facility
0
0.0
Campus event
0
0.0
Faculty office
0
0.0
Public space on campus
0
0.0
In a meeting with a group of people
0
0.0
Off-campus housing
0
0.0
Athletic facilities
0
0.0
Other
0
0.0
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone fearing for their family’s safety (n = 7).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
183
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B64
Referring to your answer, "The assumption that someone was admitted or hired because of his/her identity" in
question #51, where did this conduct occur? (Question 51n)
Location
n
%
While working at a campus job
28
47.5
Campus office
12
20.3
In a meeting with a group of people
10
16.9
In a class
9
15.3
Faculty office
8
13.6
In a meeting with one other person
6
10.2
Off- campus location
5
8.5
University housing residence hall
4
6.8
Campus event
4
6.8
Public space on campus
4
6.8
While walking on campus
3
5.1
University dining facility
2
3.4
Private residence hall
1
1.7
University housing apartment
1
1.7
Athletic facilities
1
1.7
Fraternity/sorority house
0
0.0
Off-campus housing
0
0.0
Other
2
3.4
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of the assumption that someone was admitted or
hired because of their identity (n = 59). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
184
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B65
Referring to your answer, "Someone being the victim of a crime because of his/her identity" in question #51, where
did this conduct occur? (Question 51o)
Location
n
%
Off- campus location
17
45.9
While walking on campus
9
24.3
University housing residence hall
9
24.3
While working at a campus job
5
13.5
Public space on campus
5
13.5
Off-campus housing
5
13.5
In a class
2
5.4
Private residence hall
2
5.4
Campus event
2
5.4
Campus office
1
2.7
Faculty office
1
2.7
In a meeting with one other person
1
2.7
In a meeting with a group of people
1
2.7
Athletic facilities
1
2.7
University housing apartment
0
0.0
Fraternity/sorority house
0
0.0
University dining facility
0
0.0
Other
1
2.7
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone being the victim of a crime (n = 37).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
185
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B66
Referring to your answer, "Someone receiving a poor grade because of a hostile classroom environment" in question
#51, where did this conduct occur? (Question 51p)
Location
n
%
In a class
29
72.5
While walking on campus
4
10.0
Faculty office
4
10.0
Off- campus location
4
10.0
While working at a campus job
3
7.5
Campus office
3
7.5
In a meeting with a group of people
3
7.5
University housing residence hall
2
5.0
In a meeting with one other person
2
5.0
Campus event
1
2.5
Private residence hall
0
0.0
University housing apartment
0
0.0
Fraternity/sorority house
0
0.0
University dining facility
0
0.0
Public space on campus
0
0.0
Off-campus housing
0
0.0
Athletic facilities
0
0.0
Other
0
0.0
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone receiving a poor grade (n = 40).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
186
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B67
Referring to your answer, "Someone receiving a low performance evaluation" in question #51, where did this
conduct occur? (Question 51q)
Location
n
%
While working at a campus job
36
44.4
In a class
21
25.9
Campus office
16
19.8
In a meeting with a group of people
14
17.3
Faculty office
12
14.8
In a meeting with one other person
11
13.6
Off- campus location
3
3.7
While walking on campus
2
2.5
Public space on campus
2
2.5
University housing residence hall
1
1.2
Fraternity/sorority house
1
1.2
Campus event
1
1.2
Private residence hall
0
0.0
University housing apartment
0
0.0
University dining facility
0
0.0
Off-campus housing
0
0.0
Athletic facilities
0
0.0
Other
4
4.9
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone receiving a low performance evaluation (n = 81).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
187
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B68
Referring to your answer, "Someone singled out as the 'resident authority' due to his/her identity" in question #51,
where did this conduct occur? (Question 51r)
Location
n
%
While working at a campus job
23
45.1
In a class
18
35.3
In a meeting with a group of people
16
31.4
University housing residence hall
13
25.5
While walking on campus
9
17.6
Campus office
7
13.7
Campus event
7
13.7
Public space on campus
7
13.7
Off- campus location
7
13.7
Faculty office
5
9.8
University dining facility
4
7.8
In a meeting with one other person
4
7.8
Athletic facilities
3
5.9
University housing apartment
2
3.9
Off-campus housing
2
3.9
Private residence hall
1
2.0
Fraternity/sorority house
1
2.0
Other
1
2.0
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone singled out as the “resident authority” (n = 51).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
188
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B69
Referring to your answer, "Someone isolated or left out when work was required in groups because of his/her
identity" in question #51, where did this conduct occur? (Question 51s)
Location
n
%
In a class
32
49.2
In a meeting with a group of people
28
43.1
While working at a campus job
21
32.3
Public space on campus
13
20.0
Campus event
11
16.9
Off- campus location
11
16.9
Campus office
10
15.4
While walking on campus
9
13.8
University housing residence hall
9
13.8
Faculty office
8
12.3
In a meeting with one other person
5
7.7
Off-campus housing
4
6.2
Private residence hall
3
4.6
Fraternity/sorority house
3
4.6
University dining facility
3
4.6
University housing apartment
2
3.1
Athletic facilities
2
3.1
Other
0
0.0
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone isolated or left out when
work was required in groups (n = 65). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
189
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B70
Referring to your answer, "Someone isolated or left out because of his/her identity" in question #51, where did this
conduct occur? (Question 51t)
Location
n
%
In a class
37
34.6
In a meeting with a group of people
31
29.0
While working at a campus job
25
23.4
University housing residence hall
24
22.4
Public space on campus
18
16.8
Off- campus location
16
15.0
While walking on campus
14
13.1
Campus office
13
12.1
Campus event
12
11.2
University dining facility
7
6.5
In a meeting with one other person
7
6.5
Faculty office
5
4.7
Off-campus housing
5
4.7
Athletic facilities
3
2.8
Fraternity/sorority house
2
1.9
Private residence hall
1
0.9
University housing apartment
1
0.9
Other
2
1.9
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone isolated or left out (n = 107).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
190
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B71
Referring to your answer, "Someone isolated or left out because of his/her socioeconomic status" in question #51,
where did this conduct occur? (Question 51u)
Location
n
%
In a class
10
32.0
While walking on campus
9
28.1
Public space on campus
8
25.0
In a meeting with a group of people
8
25.0
Off- campus location
8
25.0
University housing residence hall
7
21.9
While working at a campus job
5
15.6
Campus office
5
15.6
Campus event
3
9.4
Off-campus housing
3
9.4
Fraternity/sorority house
2
6.3
University dining facility
2
6.3
Faculty office
2
6.3
In a meeting with one other person
2
6.3
Private residence hall
1
3.1
Athletic facilities
1
3.1
University housing apartment
0
0.0
Other
0
0.0
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of someone isolated or left out because of their
socioeconomic status (n = 32). Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
191
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B72
Referring to your answer, "Other - Specified" in question #51, where did this conduct occur? (Question 51v)
Location
n
%
While working at a campus job
11
28.2
In a meeting with a group of people
10
25.6
Campus office
9
23.1
In a class
6
15.4
While walking on campus
5
12.8
Campus event
4
10.3
Public space on campus
4
10.3
In a meeting with one other person
4
10.3
University housing apartment
1
2.6
University dining facility
1
2.6
Faculty office
1
2.6
Athletic facilities
1
2.6
Off- campus location
1
2.6
University housing residence hall
0
0.0
Private residence hall
0
0.0
Fraternity/sorority house
0
0.0
Off-campus housing
0
0.0
Other
8
20.5
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed or were aware of “Other” (n = 39).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
192
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B73
Who was the source of this conduct? (Question 53)
Target
n
%
Undergraduate student
247
44.7
Don’t know source
97
17.6
Faculty member
90
16.3
Colleague
83
15.0
Staff member
63
11.4
Administrator
55
10.0
Academic administrator
36
6.5
Supervisor
31
5.6
Community member
24
4.3
Department chair
23
4.2
Campus visitor(s)
20
3.6
Campus media
14
2.5
Graduate student
14
2.5
Center director
12
2.2
Faculty advisor
12
2.2
Campus security
10
1.8
Person that I supervise
7
1.3
Teaching Assistant
4
0.7
Post-doctoral researcher/fellow
0
0.0
Research assistant
0
0.0
Other
37
6.7
Note: Only answered by respondents who observed harassment (n = 552).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
193
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B74
Please describe your reactions to experiencing this conduct? (Question 54)
Reactions
n
%
Was angry
204
37.0
Felt embarrassed
173
31.3
Told a friend
130
23.6
Avoided the person who engaged in the
inappropriate conduct
101
18.3
Ignored it
94
17.0
Confronted the person who engaged in the
inappropriate conduct at the time
79
14.3
Didn’t know who to go to
56
10.1
Made a complaint to a campus employee/official
53
9.6
Left the situation immediately
52
9.4
Didn’t affect me at the time
49
8.9
Was afraid
48
8.7
Didn’t report it for fear of retaliation
43
7.8
Didn’t report it for fear my complaint would not
be taken seriously
41
7.4
Confronted the person who engaged in the
inappropriate conduct later
40
10.7
Felt somehow responsible
29
5.3
Sought support from counseling/advocacy
services
9
1.6
Other
57
10.3
Note: Only answered by respondents who experienced harassment (n = 552).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
194
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B75
Faculty/Staff only: I have observed unfair and unjust hiring practices at UW-Stout (e.g., hiring supervisor bias,
search committee bias, limited recruiting pool, lack of effort in diversifying recruiting pool). (Question 56)
Perceived
unfair/unjust hiring
n
%
Yes
156
26.8
No
426
73.2
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were faculty or staff in Question 1 (n = 598).
195
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B76
Employees only: I believe that the unfair and unjust hiring practice was based upon: (Question 57)
Based on:
n
%
Gender
36
23.1
Age
22
14.1
Ethnicity
22
14.1
Race
18
11.5
Country of origin
17
10.9
Institutional status
17
10.9
Educational level
15
9.6
Advanced experience level of the job
candidate
14
9.0
Physical characteristics
10
6.4
English language proficiency/accent
9
5.8
Gender identity
9
5.8
Political views
9
5.8
Marital/partner status
8
5.1
Physical disability
6
3.8
Immigrant status
5
3.2
Sexual orientation
5
3.2
Gender expression
3
1.9
Socioeconomic status
3
1.9
Learning disability
2
1.3
Military/veteran status
1
0.6
Psychological disability
1
0.6
Parental status (e.g., having children)
0
0.0
Religious/spiritual views
0
0.0
Other
46
29.5
Note: Only answered by employees who observed discriminatory practices (n = 156).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
196
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B77
Faculty/Staff only: I have observed unfair or unjust employment-related disciplinary actions up to and including
dismissal at UW-Stout. (Question 59)
Perceived unfair/unjust
disciplinary actions
n
%
Yes
102
17.3
No
487
82.7
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were faculty or staff in Question 1 (n = 598).
197
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B78
Faculty/Staff Only: I believe that the unfair or unjust, employment-related disciplinary actions were based upon:
(Question 60)
Based on:
n
%
Gender
20
19.6
Ethnicity
18
17.6
Educational level
12
11.8
Race
12
11.8
Age
11
10.8
Country of origin
11
10.8
Advanced experience level of the job
candidate
9
8.9
Political views
9
8.8
Physical characteristics
7
6.9
English language proficiency/accent
6
5.9
Institutional status
5
4.9
Gender identity
4
3.9
Immigrant status
4
3.9
Sexual orientation
4
3.9
Psychological disability
3
2.9
Physical disability
3
2.9
Socioeconomic status
3
2.9
Gender expression
2
2.0
Parental status (e.g., having children)
2
2.0
Religious/spiritual views
2
2.0
Learning disability
1
1.0
Marital/partner status
0
0.0
Military/veteran status
0
0.0
Other
32
31.4
Note: Only answered by employees who observed discriminatory practices (n = 102).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
198
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B79
Faculty/Staff only: I have observed unfair or unjust behavior, procedures, or employment practices related to
promotion at UW-Stout. (Question 62)
Perceived unfair/unjust
promotion
n
%
Yes
146
25.0
No
439
75.0
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were faculty or staff in Question 1 (n = 598).
199
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B80
Faculty/Staff Only: I believe that the unfair or unjust behavior, procedures, or employment practices related to
promotion/tenure/reappointment/reclassification were based upon: (Question 63)
Based on:
n
%
Gender
40
27.4
Educational level
23
15.8
Age
20
13.7
Race
18
12.3
Advanced experience level of the job
candidate
15
10.3
Ethnicity
14
9.6
Institutional status
13
8.9
Political views
12
8.2
Country of origin
10
6.8
Physical characteristics
10
6.8
Sexual orientation
7
4.8
Gender identity
6
4.1
English language proficiency/accent
4
2.7
Immigrant status
4
2.7
Learning disability
4
2.7
Gender expression
3
2.1
Parental status (e.g., having children)
3
2.1
Psychological disability
3
2.1
Physical disability
3
2.1
Religious/spiritual views
3
2.1
Socioeconomic status
3
2.1
Marital/partner status
2
1.4
Military/veteran status
1
0.7
Other
47
32.2
Note: Only answered by employees who observed discriminatory practices (n = 146).
Percentages do not sum to 100 due to multiple responses.
200
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B81
Using a scale of 1-5, please rate the overall climate on campus on the following dimensions: (Questions 65-66)
1
2
3
4
5
Standard
Deviation
n
n
%
n
%
n
%
n
%
n
%
Mean
n
Friendly/Hostile
678
36.7
811
43.9
285
15.4
65
3.5
8
0.4
1.9
0.8
Concerned/Indifferent
288
15.7
659
35.8
638
34.7
196
10.7
58
3.2
2.5
1.0
Cooperative/Uncooperative
401
21.8
881
47.8
411
22.3
131
7.1
19
1.0
2.2
0.9
Improving/Regressing
350
19.0
753
40.9
534
29.0
156
8.5
48
2.6
2.3
1.0
Accessible for persons with
disabilities/Inaccessible for
persons with disabilities
522
28.5
756
41.3
401
21.9
131
7.2
20
1.1
2.1
0.9
Positive for people who identify
as lesbian, gay, bisexual or
transgender/Negative
321
17.6
688
37.7
613
33.6
175
9.6
29
1.6
2.4
0.9
Positive for people of my
faith/Negative
394
21.5
639
34.9
663
36.2
105
5.7
32
1.7
2.3
0.9
Positive for non-native English
speakers/Negative
256
14.0
600
32.8
717
39.2
218
11.9
40
2.2
2.6
0.9
Positive for people who are
immigrants/Negative
280
15.4
610
33.4
737
40.4
171
9.4
26
1.4
2.5
0.9
Positive for International people
/Negative
359
19.6
760
41.6
564
30.8
119
6.5
27
1.5
2.3
0.9
Dimension
201
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B81cont.
Using a scale of 1-5, please rate the overall climate on campus on the following dimensions: (Questions 65-66)
1
3
2
4
5
n
%
n
%
n
n
%
%
n
%
Mean
Standard
Deviation
Welcoming/Non-welcoming
588
32.0
842
45.8
294
16.0
101
5.5
14
0.8
2.0
0.9
Respectful/Disrespectful
469
25.6
836
45.6
368
20.1
134
7.3
28
1.5
2.1
0.9
Positive for people who are
raising children/Negative for
people who are raising
children
409
22.3
710
38.8
574
31.3
115
6.3
23
1.3
2.3
0.9
Positive for people of low
socioeconomic status/Negative
324
17.7
672
36.8
675
36.9
126
6.9
31
1.7
2.4
0.9
Non-racist/Racist
464
25.1
670
36.3
427
23.1
259
14.0
28
1.5
2.3
1.0
Non-sexist/Sexist
480
26.0
672
36.4
450
24.4
211
11.4
34
1.8
2.3
1.0
Non-homophobic/
Homophobic
365
19.9
602
32.8
520
28.3
282
15.4
67
3.6
2.5
1.1
Not age biased/Age biased
515
28.0
603
32.7
499
27.1
194
10.5
31
1.7
2.3
1.0
Not classist (socioeconomic
status)/ Classist
471
25.6
618
33.6
574
31.2
147
8.0
28
1.5
2.3
1.0
Not classist (position)/Classist
485
26.5
569
31.0
546
29.8
171
9.3
62
3.4
2.3
1.1
Dimension
202
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B82
Faculty/Students Only: The classroom climate is welcoming for students based on their: (Question 67)
Characteristic
Strongly agree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Neither agree nor
disagree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly disagree
n
%
Don’t Know
n
%
Age
506
34.7
628
43.1
208
14.3
62
4.3
13
0.9
40
2.7
Country of origin
392
26.9
630
43.3
290
19.9
63
4.3
14
1.0
67
4.6
Ethnicity
392
26.9
617
42.4
306
21.0
71
4.9
18
1.2
52
3.6
Mental health status
290
20.0
514
35.5
418
28.9
102
7.0
25
1.7
98
6.8
Gender
492
34.0
631
43.5
219
15.1
48
3.3
14
1.0
45
3.1
Gender identity
332
22.9
580
40.0
334
23.0
93
6.4
27
1.9
84
5.8
Gender expression
318
21.9
554
38.2
356
24.5
105
7.2
32
2.2
86
5.9
Immigrant status
337
23.3
546
37.7
382
26.4
68
4.7
10
0.7
104
7.2
Learning disability status
368
25.4
592
40.9
310
21.4
68
4.7
21
1.5
88
6.1
Marital/partner status
456
31.5
590
40.7
287
19.8
31
2.1
11
0.8
74
5.1
Parental status
439
30.3
597
41.3
281
19.4
46
3.2
14
1.0
70
4.8
Physical characteristics
376
26.0
591
40.8
317
21.9
86
5.9
18
1.2
60
4.1
Physical disability status
360
24.8
591
40.8
344
23.7
61
4.2
21
1.4
72
5.0
Political views
350
24.2
550
38.1
351
34.3
88
6.1
31
2.1
74
5.1
Race
384
26.6
592
41.0
295
20.4
97
6.7
22
1.5
55
3.8
Religious/spiritual views
370
25.6
576
39.9
340
23.5
67
4.6
23
1.6
68
4.7
Sexual orientation
321
22.3
574
39.8
322
22.3
110
7.6
40
2.8
74
5.1
Socioeconomic status
370
25.7
601
41.7
328
22.8
52
3.6
21
1.5
68
4.7
Military/veteran status
522
36.1
579
40.1
238
16.5
27
1.9
11
0.8
67
4.6
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were faculty or students in Question 1 (n =1491).
203
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B83
Faculty/Staff Only: The workplace climate is welcoming for faculty/staff based on their: (Question 68)
Characteristic
Strongly agree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Neither agree nor
disagree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly disagree
n
%
Don’t Know
n
%
Age
100
17.6
284
49.9
109
19.2
53
9.3
10
1.8
13
2.3
Country of origin
93
16.3
265
46.5
139
24.4
31
5.4
6
1.1
36
6.3
Ethnicity
98
17.2
264
46.3
136
23.9
42
7.4
7
1.2
23
4.0
Mental health status
60
10.6
173
30.5
195
34.3
51
9.0
12
2.1
77
13.6
Gender
105
18.5
261
46.0
128
22.5
38
6.7
16
2.8
20
3.5
Gender identity
84
14.8
208
36.7
155
27.3
39
6.9
9
1.6
72
12.7
Gender expression
80
14.1
201
35.5
159
28.1
38
6.7
12
2.1
76
13.4
Immigrant status
82
14.4
225
39.5
148
26.0
33
5.8
6
1.1
75
13.2
Learning disability status
81
14.3
194
34.3
167
29.6
29
5.1
7
1.2
87
15.4
Marital/partner status
100
17.7
255
45.1
148
26.1
20
3.5
8
1.4
35
6.2
Parental status
100
17.7
262
46.3
142
25.1
24
4.2
11
1.9
27
4.8
Physical characteristics
91
16.1
244
43.1
157
27.7
31
5.5
9
1.6
34
6.0
Physical disability status
86
15.2
235
41.7
162
28.7
28
5.0
3
0.5
50
8.9
Political views
73
12.9
207
36.6
176
31.2
49
8.7
21
3.7
39
6.9
Race
97
17.2
252
44.6
134
23.7
47
8.3
11
1.9
24
4.2
Religious/spiritual views
81
14.3
228
40.3
167
29.5
41
7.2
9
1.6
40
7.1
Sexual orientation
86
15.2
224
39.5
146
25.7
45
7.9
8
1.4
58
10.2
Socioeconomic status
88
15.5
229
40.3
157
27.6
36
6.3
12
2.1
46
8.1
Military/veteran status
112
20.0
248
44.3
131
23.4
12
2.1
3
0.5
54
9.6
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were faculty or staff in Question 1 (n = 598).
204
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B84
How would you rate the accessibility on campus for people with physical, learning, psychological, or medical disabilities? (Question 69)
Fully
Accessible
Accessible with assistance
or intervention
n
%
n
%
Bathroom in general
81
45.3
602
Doors and entrances
867
48.5
Elevators
1084
Footbridge
Not
Accessible
Don’t Know
n
%
n
%
33.7
78
4.4
297
16.6
589
32.9
73
4.1
259
14.5
60.6
379
21.2
61
3.4
264
14.8
837
47.2
312
17.6
44
2.5
581
32.8
Parking
852
48.0
471
26.5
105
5.9
347
19.5
Walkways and pedestrian paths
919
51.9
474
26.8
77
4.3
301
17.0
Classroom labs and studios
686
38.7
508
28.7
75
4.2
502
28.3
Computer labs
730
41.2
393
22.2
51
2.9
596
33.7
D2L
1015
57.1
273
15.4
17
1.0
472
26.6
In-class instruction
935
52.9
366
20.7
23
1.3
442
25.0
Online and hybrid courses
932
52.6
299
46.9
19
1.1
521
29.4
1015
57.5
282
16.0
34
1.9
433
24.5
Physical Accessibility
Course instruction/materials
GVSU Website
UW-Stout Website
205
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B85
Students Only: Before I enrolled, I expected the campus climate would be welcoming for people who are: (Question 71)
Group
Strongly agree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Neither agree nor
disagree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly disagree
n
%
From religious affiliations other than
Christian
411
35.3
505
43.3
220
18.9
25
2.1
4
0.3
From Christian affiliations
478
41.2
478
41.2
188
16.2
13
1.1
2
0.2
Gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender
340
29.3
478
41.2
288
24.8
45
3.9
8
0.7
Immigrants
342
29.5
511
44.1
271
23.4
31
2.7
5
0.4
International students, staff, or faculty
398
34.3
522
45.0
216
18.6
21
1.8
4
0.3
Learning disabled
384
33.1
516
44.5
244
21.0
13
1.1
3
0.3
Men
519
44.6
470
40.4
166
14.3
4
0.3
5
0.4
Affected by mental health disorder
350
30.4
517
44.8
260
22.5
22
1.9
4
0.3
Non-native English speakers
334
28.8
497
42.8
286
24.6
38
3.3
6
0.5
People with children
390
33.7
506
43.7
243
21.0
15
1.3
4
0.3
People who provide care for other than
a child
392
33.8
488
42.1
264
22.8
9
0.8
6
0.5
Physically challenged
376
32.4
533
46.0
231
19.9
15
1.3
4
0.3
Racial/ethnic minority
397
34.3
496
42.8
234
20.2
26
2.2
6
0.5
Returning/non-traditional students
428
36.9
507
43.7
200
17.2
20
1.7
5
0.4
206
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B85 (cont’)
Strongly agree
n
%
Neither agree nor
disagree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly disagree
n
%
Socioeconomically disadvantaged
392
33.9
520
45.0
228
19.7
11
1.0
5
0.4
Women
506
43.7
476
41.1
166
14.3
7
0.6
4
0.3
Veterans/active military
497
42.9
473
40.8
80
15.5
5
0.4
4
0.3
Other
153
30.2
192
37.9
152
30.0
2
0.4
7
1.4
Table B86
Students Only: My access to college is being compromised by: (Question 72)
Group
Strongly agree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Do not agree nor
disagree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly disagree
n
%
Lack of available financial aid
235
19.4
254
21.0
347
28.6
239
19.7
137
11.3
Concerns regarding financial debt upon
graduation
296
24.5
340
28.2
281
23.3
178
14.8
111
9.2
Tuition increases that are not met by
corresponding increases in financial aid
309
25.5
333
27.4
336
27.7
147
12.1
89
7.3
Other
76
30.4
33
13.2
114
45.6
9
3.6
18
7.2
207
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B87
How would you rate the climate on campus for persons from the following racial/ethnic backgrounds? (Question 73)
Very
Respectful
Moderately respectful
n
%
Somewhat respectful
n
%
Group
n
%
African
544
31.6
557
32.3
216
African American/Black
545
31.7
573
33.4
Alaskan Native
527
30.7
465
Asian American
589
34.3
Asian
570
Southeast Asian
Not at all
respectful
Don’t know
%
n
%
n
12.5
41
2.4
364
21.1
212
12.3
54
3.1
334
19.4
27.1
134
7.8
10
0.6
580
33.8
579
33.8
195
11.4
20
1.2
332
19.4
33.2
583
33.9
212
12.3
27
1.6
326
19.0
541
31.7
560
32.8
198
11.6
24
1.4
384
22.5
Caribbean/West Indian
523
30.7
507
29.8
160
9.4
17
1.0
496
29.1
Caucasian/White
898
52.4
482
28.1
91
5.3
16
0.9
226
13.2
Indian subcontinent
525
30.7
532
31.1
173
10.1
23
1.3
457
26.7
Latino(a)/Hispanic
539
31.5
560
32.8
204
11.9
26
1.5
380
22.2
Middle Eastern
479
28.0
525
30.7
231
13.5
61
3.6
414
24.2
Multiracial, multiethnic, or
multicultural persons
533
31.2
561
32.9
177
10.4
18
1.1
418
24.5
Native American Indian
525
30.8
543
31.8
172
10.1
25
1.5
440
25.8
Pacific Islanders/Hawaiian Natives
538
31.5
503
29.5
147
8.6
14
0.8
504
29.5
Other
133
20.6
148
22.9
54
8.4
5
0.8
305
47.3
208
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B88
How would you rate the overall climate on campus for people who are: (Question 74)
Very
Respectful
Group
n
%
Moderately respectful
n
%
Somewhat respectful
n
%
Not at all
respectful
n
%
Don’t know
n
%
From religious affiliations other than
Christian
527
31.4
566
33.8
219
13.1
40
2.4
325
19.4
From Christian affiliations
732
43.8
517
30.9
131
7.8
21
1.3
270
16.2
Gay, lesbian, bisexual, transgender
411
24.5
565
33.7
344
20.5
69
4.1
287
17.1
Immigrants
462
27.7
535
32.1
260
15.6
37
2.2
373
22.4
International students, staff, or faculty
553
33.1
575
34.4
241
14.4
29
1.7
272
16.3
Learning disabled
530
31.8
573
34.4
223
13.4
26
1.6
316
18.9
Men
806
48.2
512
30.6
117
7.0
16
1.0
221
13.2
Affected by mental health disorder
460
27.5
555
33.2
226
13.5
48
2.9
384
23.0
Non-native English speakers
452
27.1
524
31.4
296
17.7
81
4.9
315
18.9
People with children
618
37.0
595
35.7
155
9.3
13
0.8
288
17.3
People who provide care for other than a
child
872
34.3
531
31.8
148
8.9
20
1.2
398
23.8
Physically disabled
544
32.6
575
34.4
229
13.7
22
1.3
300
18.0
Returning/non-traditional students
636
38.0
587
35.0
183
10.9
20
1.2
249
14.9
Socioeconomically disadvantaged
515
30.9
588
35.3
212
12.7
32
1.9
318
19.1
Women
673
40.3
605
36.2
178
10.7
18
1.1
197
11.8
Veterans/active military
765
45.8
506
30.3
119
7.1
9
0.5
270
16.2
Other
125
23.7
131
24.9
54
10.2
7
1.3
210
39.8
209
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B89
There is visible leadership to foster diversity/inclusion on campus from: (Question 75)
Strongly agree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Neither agree nor
disagree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly disagree
n
%
Don’t Know
n
%
Faculty
538
30.3
725
40.9
254
14.3
77
4.3
25
1.4
154
8.7
Senior administration
459
25.9
617
34.9
309
17.5
109
6.2
61
3.4
214
12.1
Students
383
21.6
664
37.5
392
22.1
128
7.2
29
1.6
175
9.9
Support staff
407
23.1
635
36.1
380
21.6
76
4.3
26
1.5
237
13.5
UW System
443
25.2
645
36.7
334
19.0
75
4.3
38
2.2
224
12.7
210
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B90
The courses I have taken or have taught at the UW-Parkside campus include materials, perspectives, and/or experiences of people based on their: (Question 76)
Characteristic
Strongly agree
n
%
Neither agree or
disagree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly disagree
n
%
Don’t Know
n
%
Country of origin
320
24.8
496
38.5
246
19.1
60
4.7
26
2.0
140
10.9
Culture
348
27.0
536
41.6
213
16.5
41
3.2
22
1.7
129
10.0
Ethnicity
328
25.5
494
38.4
252
19.6
54
4.2
23
1.8
136
10.6
Mental health status
250
19.5
376
29.4
339
26.5
104
8.1
42
3.3
169
13.2
Gender
319
24.9
489
38.1
248
19.3
59
4.6
29
2.3
138
10.8
Gender identity
274
21.4
371
29.0
319
25.0
100
7.8
45
3.5
169
13.2
Gender expression
265
20.7
379
29.6
316
24.7
105
8.2
48
3.7
168
13.1
Immigrant status
241
18.9
411
32.2
318
24.9
94
7.4
43
3.4
171
13.4
Learning disability status
255
20.0
378
29.7
325
25.5
106
8.3
41
3.2
169
13.3
Physical characteristics
250
19.6
398
31.1
335
26.2
89
7.0
37
2.9
169
13.2
Physical disability status
257
20.1
397
31.1
320
25.1
93
7.3
41
3.2
169
13.2
Race
307
24.1
471
36.9
255
20.0
64
5.0
27
2.1
152
11.9
Religion/spiritual status
269
21.1
423
33.1
294
23.0
83
6.5
42
3.3
166
13.0
Sexual orientation
252
19.8
374
29.4
324
25.4
102
8.0
48
3.8
174
13.7
Socioeconomic status
274
21.5
438
34.3
301
23.6
69
5.4
37
2.9
157
12.3
Veterans/active military status
239
18.9
397
31.4
314
24.8
101
8.0
48
3.8
167
13.2
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were students or faculty in Question 28 (n = 1491).
211
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B91
The following factors influence my attendance at diversity initiatives (e.g., cultural training, presentations, and performances).
(Question 77)
Neither agree or
disagree
n
%
Factor
Strongly agree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly disagree
n
%
Diversity initiatives are relevant to my work.
358
22.0
558
34.3
524
32.2
120
7.4
67
4.1
Diversity events are well advertised.
262
16.1
626
38.5
521
32.1
167
10.3
49
3.0
Diversity events fit into my schedule.
256
15.8
412
25.4
636
39.2
250
15.4
70
4.3
I am expected to attend these events.
212
13.1
328
20.2
577
35.6
365
22.5
139
8.6
I feel that I am welcome at these events.
350
21.5
585
36.0
554
34.1
93
5.7
43
2.6
I learn from these events.
315
19.5
550
34.0
641
39.6
64
4.0
49
3.0
My work/school load prevents me from attending.
312
19.3
561
34.6
536
33.1
156
9.6
55
3.4
Personal invitation from institutional leadership
234
14.5
520
32.2
580
35.9
197
12.2
86
5.3
Diversity initiatives are not relevant to my role on
campus
163
10.1
300
18.6
577
35.7
339
21.0
236
14.6
Other
55
15.4
66
18.4
205
57.3
3
0.8
29
8.1
212
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B92
Employees Only: In your judgment, how strongly would you agree that each of the following positively affect the climate at UW-Stout? (Question 78)
Strongly
Agree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Neither Agree Nor
Disagree
n
%
Strongly
Disagree
Disagree
n
%
n
%
Don’t Know
n
%
Providing tenure clock options with more flexibility
for promotion/tenure for faculty/staff with families
88
15.8
137
24.6
94
16.9
19
3.4
12
2.2
207
37.2
Providing recognition and rewards for including
diversity in course objectives across the curriculum.
65
11.7
156
28.1
122
21.9
55
9.9
29
5.2
129
23.2
Requiring all writing emphasis classes to involve at
least one assignment that focuses on issues, research
and perspective that involve diverse populations.
68
12.3
153
27.7
109
19.7
62
11.2
31
5.6
129
23.4
Training mentors and leaders within departments to
model positive climate behavior.
151
27.3
226
40.8
94
17.0
21
3.8
12
2.2
50
9.0
Offering diversity training/programs as community
outreach for members of the public/community.
91
16.5
213
38.7
132
24.0
31
5.6
20
3.6
63
11.5
Rewarding research efforts that evaluate outcomes of
diversity training.
67
12.3
141
25.8
157
28.8
49
9.0
33
6.0
99
18.1
Providing immersion experiences for
faculty/staff/students to learn a second language.
105
19.1
183
33.3
136
24.7
34
6.2
22
4.0
70
12.7
Providing immersion experiences for
faculty/staff/students in service learning projects with
lower socioeconomic populations.
102
18.6
192
35.0
141
25.7
24
4.4
14
2.6
75
13.7
Providing immersion experiences for
faculty/staff/students with
underrepresented/underserved populations.
105
19.3
183
33.6
149
27.3
20
3.7
18
3.3
70
12.8
Providing on-campus child-care services.
150
27.2
214
38.8
89
16.2
12
2.2
18
3.3
68
12.3
Providing gender neutral/family friendly facilities.
110
20.0
179
32.6
146
26.6
14
2.6
17
3.1
83
15.1
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were employees in Question 28 (n = 598)
213
Rankin & Associates Consulting
Wisconsin System Climate Assessment Project
UW-Stout Final Report - July 2011
Table B92cont.
Employees Only: In your judgment, how strongly would you agree that each of the following positively affect the climate at UW-Stout? (Question 78)
Strongly
Agree
n
%
Agree
n
%
Do not Agree or
Disagree
n
%
Disagree
n
%
Strongly
Disagree
n
%
Don’t Know
n
%
Provide, promote and improve access to
quality counseling available to
faculty/staff/students who experience sexual
abuse on campus or in the community
169
30.9
217
39.7
82
15.0
7
1.3
9
1.6
63
11.5
Provide mentors for minority
faculty/staff/students new to campus
165
30.3
225
41.4
79
14.5
10
1.8
11
2.0
54
9.9
Providing a clear protocol for responding to
hate/hostile incidents process on campus
243
44.3
201
36.7
50
9.1
7
1.3
9
1.6
38
6.9
Providing a clear protocol for responding to
hate/hostile incidents process at the
departmental level.
236
43.2
197
36.1
60
11.0
7
1.3
8
1.5
38
7.0
Reallocating resources to support inclusive
climate changes on campus
98
18.0
150
27.6
156
28.7
40
7.4
35
6.4
64
11.8
Including diversity related activities as one of
the criteria for hiring and/or evaluation of
staff/faculty and administrators.
75
13.8
102
18.8
166
30.6
66
12.2
75
13.8
58
10.7
Requiring diversity and equity training to
every search and screen committee including
faculty, staff, and administrators.
81
14.9
166
30.5
146
26.8
46
8.4
54
9.9
52
9.5
Note: Table includes only those respondents who indicated they were employees in Question 28 (n = 598)
214