Gen. Math. Notes, Vol. 6, No. 2, October 2011, pp. 24-32 ISSN 2219-7184; Copyright © ICSRS Publication, 2011 www.i-csrs.org Available free online at http://www.geman.in On Degree of Approximation by Product Means (E, q )(N , p ) of Fourier n Series Mahendra Misra1, U.K. Misra2, B.P. Padhy3 and M.K. Muduli4 1 Principal, Government Science College Mlkangiri, Orissa E-mail: mahendramisra@2007.gmail.com 2 Department of Mathematics, Berhampur University Berhampur–760007, Orissa, India E-mail: umakanta_misra@yahoo.com 3 Roland Institute of Technology, Golanthara-760008, Odisha, India E-mail: iraady@gmail.com 4 Roland Institute of Technology, Golanthara-760008, Odisha, India E-mail: malayamudulimath@gmail.com (Received: 7-7-11/ Accepted: 14-10-11) Abstract In this paper a theorem on degree of Approximation of a function f ∈ Lip α by product summability (E , q )(N , p n ) of Fourier series associated with f . Keywords: Degree of Approximation, f ∈ Lip α class of function, (E, q ) mean, (N , p n ) mean, (E , q )(N , p n ) product mean, Fourier series, Lebesgue integral On Degree of Approximation… 1 Let 25 Introduction ∑a n be a given infinite series with the sequence of partial sums {p n } be a sequence of positive real numbers such that n Pn = ∑ pυ → ∞ (1.1) {s n } . Let as n → ∞ , ( P−i = p −i = 0 , i ≥ 0 ) υ =0 The sequence –to-sequence transformation 1 tn = Pn (1.2) n ∑p υ =0 s n −υ υ {t n } of the (N , p n ) -mean of the sequence {s n } generated by sequence of coefficient {p n }. If defines the sequence by the t n → s , as n → ∞ , (1.3) then the series ∑a n is said to be ( N , p n ) summable to s . The conditions for regularity of Nörlund summability ( N , p n ) are easily seen to p be (i) n → 0 as n → ∞ Pn n (ii) ∑p k =0 k = O ( Pn ) as n → ∞ The sequence –to-sequence transformation, [1] Tn = (1.4) n 1 n q (1 + q ) υ∑ υ n =0 n −υ sυ . defines the sequence {Tn } of the (E, q ) mean of the sequence {s n } . If (1.5) Tn → s as n → ∞ then the series ∑a n is said to be (E, q ) summable to s . Clearly (E, q ) method is regular. Further, the (E, q ) transform of the (N , p n ) transform of {s n } is defined by 26 Mahendra Misra et al. τn = (1.6) = If (1.7) then n 1 n q (1 + q ) ∑ k n n−k k =0 n n−k q ∑ k =0 k n 1 (1 + q )n Tk 1 Pk k ∑p υ =0 s k −υ υ τ n → s as n → ∞ ∑a n is said to be (E , q )(N , p n ) -summable to s . Let f (t ) be a periodic function with period 2π, L-integrable over (-π,π), The Fourier series associated with f at any point x is defined by (1.8) ∞ ∞ a0 f ( x) ~ + ∑ (a n cos nx + bn sin nx ) ≡ ∑ An ( x) 2 n =1 n =0 Let s n ( f ; x ) be the n-th partial sum of (1.8). The L∞ -norm of a function f : R → R is defined by (1.9) f ∞ = sup{ f ( x) : x ∈ R } and the Lυ -norm is defined by 1 (1.10) f υ υ 2π υ = ∫ f ( x ) 0 , υ ≥1 f : R → R by a trigonometric The degree of approximation of a function polynomial Pn ( x) of degree n under norm (1.11) Pn − f ∞ . ∞ is defined by [4]. = sup{ p n ( x) − f ( x) : x ∈ R } and the degree of approximation E n ( f ) of a function f ∈ Lυ is given by (1.12) E n ( f ) = min Pn − f Pn υ On Degree of Approximation… 27 This method of approximation is called Trigonometric Fourier approximation. A function f ∈ Lipα if (1.13) ( ) ,0 < α ≤ 1 f ( x + t ) − f ( x) = O t α We use the following notation throughout this paper : (1.14) φ (t ) = f ( x + t ) + f ( x − t ) − 2 f ( x), and (1.15) K n (t ) = 1 n 2π (1 + q ) n n k =0 ∑ k 1 q n −k Pk k ∑p υ =0 k −υ 1 sin υ + t 2 . t sin 2 Further, the method (E , q )(N , p n ) is assumed to be regular and this case is supposed through out the paper. 2 Known Theorem Dealing with The degree of approximation by the product (E , q ) (c,1) -mean of Fourier series, Nigam [2] proved the following theorem: Theorem 2.1 If a function f ,2π - periodic, belonging to class Lipα , then its degree of approximation by (E , q ) (c,1) summability mean on its Fourier series ∞ ∑ An (t ) is given by E n cn − f q 1 n =0 where Enq c1n represents the 3 ∞ (E, q ) 1 = o α (n + 1) ,0 < α < 1 , transform of (c,1) transform of s n ( f ; x ) . Main Theorem In this paper, we have proved a theorem on degree of approximation by the product mean (E , q )(N , p n ) of Fourier series (1.8) .we prove Theorem 3.1 If f is a 2π − Periodic function of class Lipα , then degree of approximation by the product (E , q )(N , p n ) summability means on its Fourier series (1.8) is given by 28 Mahendra Misra et al. τn − f 4 ∞ 1 = O α (n + 1) ,0 < α < 1 where τ n on defined in (1.6) . Required Lemmas We require the following Lemmas to prove the theorem. Lemma 4.1 K n (t ) = O(n) 1 n +1 ,0 ≤ t ≤ Proof: For 0 ≤ t ≤ 1 , we have sinnt ≤ nsint then n +1 K n (t ) = ≤ ≤ n ∑ k =0 k n 1 n 2π (1 + q ) n n − k 1 q ∑ k =0 k Pk n 1 2π (1 + q ) n−k 1 q Pk n 2π (1 + q ) n ∑p υ =0 =0 ( 2n + 1) n n n − k q ≤ n ∑ 2π (1 + q ) k =0 k =O(n). This proves the lemma. Lemma 4.2 1 1 K n (t ) = O , for ≤t ≤π . n +1 t 1 sin υ + t 2 t sin 2 (2υ + 1)sin t k ∑p υ k −υ k −υ 1 n n−k q (2k + 1) ∑ k =0 k Pk n 1 k 2 t sin 2 k p ∑ υ =0 k −υ On Degree of Approximation… 29 Proof: For Then 1 t t ≤ t ≤ π , we have by Jordan’s lemma, sin ≥ , sin nt ≤ 1 n +1 2 π K n (t ) = ≤ n n −k 1 q ∑ k =0 k Pk n 1 n 2π (1 + q ) n n−k 1 q ∑ k =0 k Pk n 1 2π (1 + q ) n n n −k 1 q = ∑ n 2 (1 + q ) t k =0 k Pk n 1 k p ∑ υ k ∑ υ =0 π p k −υ t =0 k p ∑ υ =0 k −υ 1 sin υ + t 2 t sin 2 k −υ . n n−k = ∑ q n 2 (1 + q ) t k =0 k 1 n 1 = O . t This proves the lemma. 5 Proof of Theorem 3.1 Using Riemann –Lebesgue theorem, we have for the n-th partial sum s n ( f ; x ) of the Fourier series (1.8) of f (x) , 1 sin n + t 1 2 s n ( f ; x ) − f ( x) = φ (t ) dt , ∫ 2π 0 t sin 2 π following Titechmarch [3],the (N , p n ) transform of s n ( f ; x ) using (1.2) is given by 1 sin n + t π n 1 2 t n − f ( x) = φ (t )∑ p n − k dt , ∫ 2π Pn 0 t k =0 sin 2 30 Mahendra Misra et al. Directing the τn − f = (E , q )(N , p n ) transform of s n ( f ; x ) by τ n , we have n n−k 1 q ∫0 φ (t )∑ k =0 k Pk π 1 n 2π (1 + q ) n k −υ 1 sin υ + t 2 dt t sin 2 k −υ 1 sin υ + t 2 dt t sin 2 k ∑p υ =0 π = ∫ φ (t ) K n (t ) dt 0 n1+1 π = ∫ + ∫ φ (t ) K n (t ) dt 1 0 n +1 = I 1 + I 2 , say (5.1) Now 1 I1 = 1 2π (1 + q ) n n +1 ∫ n k =0 k n φ (t )∑ 0 ≤ O (n) 1 n +1 1 q n −k Pk φ ( t ) dt ∫ 0 1 n +1 = O ( n) ∫ t α dt 0 α +1 1 n +1 t = O ( n) α + 1 0 1 = O ( n) α +1 . (α + 1)(n + 1) k ∑p υ =0 , using Lemma 4.1 On Degree of Approximation… 31 1 = O α +1 (n + 1) (5.2) Next I2 ≤ π ∫ φ ( t ) K n ( t ) dt 1 n +1 π ∫ = 1 n +1 1 φ (t ) O dt , using Lemma 4.2 t π ∫ = 1 n +1 π ∫ = t 1 t α O dt t α −1 dt 1 n +1 (5.3) ( ) n + 1 1 = O α Then from (5.2) and (5.3) , we have 1 τ n − f ( x ) = O α , for 0 < α < 1 ( n + 1 ) τ n − f (x ) ∞ = sup τ n − f (x ) = O −π < x <π 1 α (n + 1) ,0 < α < 1 This completes the proof of the theorem. 6 Corollaries The following corollaries can be derived from our main theorem. Corollary 6.1 If p n = 1 , ∀ n ∈ N , theorem 2.1 follows from theorem 3.1. . 32 Mahendra Misra et al. Corollary 6.2 If p n = 1 , ∀ n and q = 1 then the theorem 3.1 reduces to degree of approximation for (E,1) (C,1) method of Fourier series. References [1] [2] [3] [4] G.H. Hardy, Divergent Series (1st edition), Oxford University Press, (1970). H.K. Nigam and K. Sharma, The degree of approximation by product means, Ultra Scientist, 22(3) (2010), 889-894. E.C. Titechmalch, The Theory of Functions, Oxford University Press, (1939). A. Zggmund, Trigonometric Series (2nd Edition, Vol. I), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1959).