-
Lambert, Richard D. International Studies and the
on Education, Washington D.C., 1989, p.168.
Under~aduate.
American Council
Leinwand, Gerald. "Without a Nickel: The Challenge of Internationalizing the
Curriculum and the Campus." American Association of State Colleges and
Universities, Washington D.C., 1983, p. 61.
Smuckler, Ralph and Lawrence Sommers. "Internationalizing the Curriculum (Higher
Education Institutions in the United States)." National Forum, Fall 1988, pp. 5-10.
Tonkin, Humphrey. "Positioning Global Education for the 1990s: Higher Education
Strategies Remarks to the Sub-Plenary Session." Paper presented at the Annual
Meeting of the American Forum on Education and International Comptetence, St.
Louis, MI, 1988, p. 5.
Tonkin, Humphrey. "Internationalizing the University: The Arduous Road to Euphoria."
Educational Record, 1990, pp. 14-18.
46
--
-
-
APPENDICES
47
-
APPENDIX A
-
QUESTIONNAIRE
48
Faculty Opinion Survey on
Intemational Education at Ball State University
This survey is being conducted to determine opinions of Boll State Faculty on intemationalization of the university as a senior honors thesis project. Therefore, a major percentage of the
grade depends on your cooperation in completing the questionnaire accurately and fully. You
also will help Ball State to obtain Information that can be utilized by members of intemational
committees and staff of the Center for International Programs.
Your opinion is vefY important! You are a part of a random sampling of faculty. All your
answers will remain anonymous; cocUng Is only for the purpose of follow-up to obtain
responses.
,-
1.
In your opinion, which of the following areas are part of international education?
Yes
No
Foreign exchange programs for faculty
Study abroad programs for students
International courses
International content in other courses
Extracurricular intemational activities
Students from other countries
Foreign language classes
Other (please specify),_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
2.
In your opinion, does Boll State have a policy pertaining to internationalizing education?
__ Yes, definitely
I think so
I don't think so
I don't know
I don't care
In your opinion, should there be one? __ Yes
_ _ No
3.
President Worthen announced internationalization as a university goal. How dedicated
do you feel the university's top leadership is to international education?
_ _ Very dedicated
__ Somewhat dedicated
__ Not dedicated at all
Please give some evidence to support your answer_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
4.
-
Is international education being stressed in your area of teaching?
All of the time
__ Often
__ Sometimes
__ Hardly ever
49
5.
Are faculty working in the following areas:
Very
Respected
Somewhat
Respected
Not at all
Respected
I don't
know
Intemational research
Intemational teaching
Intemational seNice
60. Which of the following International study abroad programs have you heard of before?
6b. Of those programs-of which you are oware--have you encouraged your students to
participate in them?
Encouraged
Heard
Ves
No
Ves
No
ISEP: Inti. Student Exchange Program
london Center
Vienna Center
Westminster College
Other (Please specify),_ _ _ _ _ _ __
70. Which of the following international activities and events offered at Boll State have you
heard of before?
7b. Of those you have heard of. in which of the following have you partiCipated?
Heard
Yes
No
PartiCipated
Ves
No
Friendship (Host) Family Program
Intemational Dinners
Intemational Festival
Foreign language Courses
Intemational Coffee Hours
When Two Cultures Meet
Canada Vear
Europe Year
8.
In your opinion, how important are each of the following benefits that faculty could gain
from intemational involvement?
Very
Somewhat
Not
Not
Important
Important
Important
Relevant
Increased cultural awareness
Increased intI. understanding
Professional development
Acquire/improve foreign language
Personal growth
Academic growth
Travel opportunity
Other
---------------------
50
9.
In your opinion, how important are the following factors in preventing faculty from
participating in intemational activities?
Not
Not
Somewhat
Very
Important
Relevant
Important
Important
Financial Burden
Lack of Time
Lack of Interest
Other Academic Responsibilities
Teaching Load
Lack of Information on programs
Lack of foreign language
Family commitments
C»her,_______________________
-
10.
Are you satisfied with the /ever of intemationalization of the curriculum at Ball State?
__ Very satisfied
__ Fairly satisfied
__ Somewhat satisfied
_ _ Not at all satisfied
__ I have no interest in this area
11.
Should an Intemational component be included in degree requirements?
__ Yes
__ No
12. Of the following strategies. which method or methods do you think should be used to
internationalize the curriculum?
Infusion--to introduce comparative, intemational and cross-cultural dimensions into
pre-existing courses throughout the curriculum
Addition-to odd specialized courses to the curriculum
Major--to add an Intemational major
Foreign Language--to require foreign language competency
Other__
__ ______
__________________________________
Our curriculum is satisfactory os it is.
~~~
~
~~
13. Does Ball State provide faculty with incentives for intemational involvement?
Yes. Could you name a few?_________________________
No
__ I don't know
14. What type of incentives should be provided for intemational involvement? Please rank
the following in order of importance (l-most important to 5-least important)
__ Salary increases
_ _ Promotion/tenure credit
_ _ Bonus/stipend payments
Special travel allowances
I would
not be interested in international involvement even with incentives. ___
_ _ Other
____________________________________________________
51
-
Demographics
15. Did you participate in any study abroad programs as a student?
__ Yes
_ _ No
16. Have you participated in an intemational overseas experience any time in your teaching
career? (Please see question 6)
Yes
No
17.
Please identify your age category?
__ 20-30 years
__ 31-40 years
__ 41-50 years
__ over 51 years
18. Please mark the category of your years of teaching experience
__ 1-5 years
__ 6-10 years
_ _ 11-20 years
__ 21-30 years
__ 31-plus years
19.
Please identify your department?_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
Additional Comments:
Please put questionnaire in envelope and put in campus mail to retum to:
Carol Wagoner
Honors Student
Marketing Department
Thank you very much for your time and cooperation!
52
-
APPENDIXB
--
-
TABLES
53
APPENDIX B, TABLE 1
1"-",y-l1
.11:4~:~
;;'1
by
C~CS~lA~S F:~ :UfSTIC~
~~S~ V'X/VH~ Site
on
tel:)::!
C(lOA
Count
I
=!Ol. Pet IBEIGE
Page 1 of 1
WHITE
Col Pet I
I
1
--------+-----~--+--------.
1
92
72
I
Ql
FGtII EX(to
4!.9.
15.3 I
56.0
15..6
44.0
+--------+--------.
74
94
I
2
SHOY II'AGAt
I
I
3
15.7
...._------+-------.
66
85
4
+--------+--------+
75
59
I
~.:
INlL C[lRSE
I
I. 56.3
I
I~lL CC~lE~l
14.1
14.0
56.0
44.0
12.4
12.5
Sl.E
INll
1?7
I
I
42.4
13 .0
+--------+--------+
92
11
~t.4
l~.~
7
164
15.3
U8
15.6
151
14.0
43.7
113
5
EXCU~fH(
56.1
15.2
134
12.5
144
13.4
10
43.0
15.1
+--------+--------+
78
~O
43.5
12.7
F':.N LAH
+--------+--------+
5
~
13
.:1.5
...
.: c 1 \1m:'!
+--------+--------+
l';::.J
OF
1.80060
P ecu- son
ll.l.>lth •.lcc'
~Cl1
1.78118
i'l
.01317
t",~t for
lirF.r iS30ciltlor
Hc;nte!-Il,o"-'l"l
5.696
~,u
m!,
~,..
)
f
~. 1 5 : 1
n~
~ f) S E r
.. i 1 1 Q n =:
54
C
7
7
1
Sign i fie.llu
.97005
.97068
.9C863
APPENDIX B, TABLE 2
-
--
.... -
CROSS'.IS: QU!S'I~N 2_1 e, COLGa CDlL!'E
SPSS V"X'V"S Site
QR '.URUSII
21-"'y-91
09:111: 51
Q2_1
-.-----..,~
DOES ISU HAVE UTEI 'OLlCY
au
lIy
'.
,
VMS "5.3
COllEGE
'age 1 .t 1
019
Count I
ae. 'et 'COLLEGE ARCHITEC BUSINESS fINE "RT SCIENCE TEACHERS
, HUUNI
10.
Col 'et aOf 'UT TURE
S
COLLE'!
4
3
5 a
4!
1
2
I
a
I
I 'Itll
a
1
2
I 1HINa SO
1
1
CONTlHIU
SO
4
-
I
CONT INOw
,
n.l ,
,
,,
u.o
+--------+--------.--------.--------+--------+--------+
I
I
YES
2
9
22.0
3'.1
7
I
I
4.9
I
I
25.0
1
2.4
1.3
I
16
39.0
23.5
6
14.6
4Cl.0
64
6
21 I
6
I
I
9.4
I
I
I
~."
42.9 I 50.0 I 41.2 I 40.0
.--------.--------.----~---.--------+--------.--------.
1
3
10
3
2
7
10.9
30."
5
7.8
62.5
12
11.8
5.3
12.5
15.1
7
23.3
30.4
.--------.---~-
,
I
1'.'
,
I
15 ••
25.0
I
I
I
..
19
U.3
10.5
13.3
14
3D
46.7
19.5
2
20.6
OF
.--
II
14 OF
154
tec. Cl
15
15
.4"6''-
1
.91330
.19117
'c
Mini.u. Expect.d '~equ.ncy .987
Cells .ith exp.cted Frequency < 5 -
55
14.7
2.
19.51894
.00112
-
52.6
-.--------.--.-----.--------.----~---.
15.06167
Nu.b.r 01 Missing Observationsl
"
20.0
21.4
Value
Pearson
Lik.lihood Ra1io
"antll-H •• nsze1 t.lt 10r
li~,'r Issoeiation
H.'
41.6
24 (
'
58.3~)
APPENDIX B, TABLE 3
14-Mly-'}1
(JCSSTAilS
10:2~:)1l
~rs~
~2_~
S<iCULO
on
VAX/VMS Site
THf.~E
!IE
O~E
by
,,~S
'IURUS:a
COLLEGE
019
'age J of 1
(;19
c.cunt
Roll.
Pc t
C" 1 :>ct
I
Ie eLL EIIE ARCHIl EC
IOF 'StT TURE
1
2
I
I
,
8USINESS FINE ART SCIENCE TEACHERS
$
COLLEGE
HU'UNI
4
f
3
5
I
I
I
I
--------+--------+--------+--------.----.---+--------4--------+
26
10I
8
15
Q2_~
I
5.1
I 100.0
y~c
1.1
90.9
18.6
100.0
':0.
T01.-1
IC.l
10C.D
.--------+--------.---.----.--------.----~---.--------+
2
I.
1
I
1
I
I
50.0
I 25.0
I 2 s.c I
I
I
1.6
I
9.1
I
I
N.)
Celumn
~ati~
.... nt~l-·f.!cn~~~l t,~t for
lirear. 1.,\~OC i.t ~
IH"ilfum E.p~ct~d F,..q".ncy wi't- "'IIP!ct-!d Fr8QUAncy
r. .. 11,
of I'i:'>l";
1.6
18.1
.Lik~lihocd
4
2.8
+--------+--------.--------.--------+--------.--------+
zt,
8
61
11
lot~l
'tu",h .. r
¥5.3
Val ue
DF
S i gni11cance
6.29813
f. 05853
1.89531
5
.21823
.30057
.16860
.
5
1
"
.2·22
<
5 -
{
OI)S<I"viltions:
6 OF
12 (
SO.OU
25
~
56
144
1C C.O
.. ------&.-.
• .. of
••
APPENDIX B, TABLE 4
1 it - '\.?y- '11
C;C~.:TQ1::'
to:~~:31
~FS~
0J
OfJ:ClTrON
YA~/~M~
j~
on TAURUS::
Site
TO INTER GCAl
U~IV
by
COllEGE
'19
Page I
C;19
Count
I
~Olll
Pet Ie ell ~G~
Co 1 Pet 10 F .StT
I
,
.QCHITEC BUSINESS FINE ART SCIENCE
5
TURE
1
I
2
3
e
I
2• 6
10 • 3
I
4
I
TEACHERS
COllEGE
HU.UU
5
"f 1
I
E
Ii".
I TCltel
--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------t
1 I
5
I
1
4
3
19
7
I
U3
0 [ rI r. AT <: J
V ":n
I
12 •
I
20.0
'12.5
14.8
19.G
7.0
87.5
21.0
1. 1
lS.O
4 8. 7
39
11. S I B . 7
29.2
4~.7
I
+--------+--------+--------.--------+--------+--------+
19
7
21
I
9
I
37
I
1
7E.O
77.8
I
I
9.0
I
37.0
I
H.O
I
56.9
I
100
E5.!
l.el
4E.l
.--------+--------.--------+--------+--------+--------+
1
1
2
Cj
1.7
4.0
-
Colum"
Tot .. l
u·s""
"'ln~II'Um
13.8
17.8
42.8
Rati}
t~pect.d
l'o.27203
.17l78
;:~~Ql.etlc)l
:xcect~d
7.7
E.7
152
6~
5.3
12.a~879
~~t~
69.2
+--------+-------.•
--------.---~---.--------.---~----.
12
I!
27
8
P ....
likglih~cd
Cells
15.4
7.4
FreQuency
.684
< 5 -
57
8 OF
S.S
ICC.O
OF
S19t1ificaflce
10
10
1
.23110
.H094
.31936
APPENDIX B, TABLE 5
,
S~
14-1;,..-11
CH
10:~11:)1
SPSS
Q4
T ~" ~
YAX/~MS
on TAURUS::
Site
IS UTER BEING STIlESSEO
by
IIMS
~S.3
INTEREST
COLCR
Page 1 of 1
CCLOR
Count
I
Ro. Pc:t I B£IGE
CoJ Pet I
I
I
.
2
1
--------+--------+--------+
1
H
7
04
ALL THE TIME
6E.l
15.1.
2
OF lEN
)
<;J,.~TI
.-
WHITE
.. FS
4
12.6
+--------+--------+
26
22
I
I
I
I
54.2
I
l~.G
I
I
45. P.
Z·I.1
+--------+--------+
39
21
60
35.9
3~
41.~
•C
4:n.4
36.~
6~
15.1 '
32.4
+--------+--------+
14
H
38
22.8
• .'"
Cni-Squ Ire
167
100.0
Value
P.i'r son
Lik~11hoco
48
28.7
I
I
.--------+--------.
P
21
33.3
9.5
6~.C
HA.OLY oIlER
Ro.
Total
@.64852
8.69283
R~tio
"'an tel-HI' nszll t85t tor
lirlar issociation
3.19315
Numb.r of Mi5!ing Observations:
2
58
OF
3
3
1
Signific:anc:e
.O~435
.03367
.01395
,
,
APPENDIX B, TABLE 6
l .. -'Iay- 11
ll:2E::t~
';;5_1
C~
05:)1
A I:,
on TAURU:;::
5FSS VAX/VMS Site
fACl'l TY DOING IHER RESEARCH
eCLOR
I
Ro. Pc t IBEIGE
.
Col Pct I
Ill'
COLOR
INTEREST
Count
2
51.9
25.3
42.1
22.5
69.2
30.8
--------+--------+--------+
1
22
16
V!: RY iHSPEClED
2
SO"F.WtUT Rt:SPHT
~f)T
-
110.
1
I
Q5_1
WHITE
i,..
3
AT All HSPE
4
I cnln new
ZZ.s
15.0
6.9
25.0
2.8
52
32.9
8
5.1
~
+--------+--------+
23
I.
31
26.4
Total
38
24.1
+--------+--------+
6
2
1
38.3
Colullln
I.
I
I
+--------+--------+
36
16
41.10
I
I
"
Total
EO
3'!.0
61.1
52.1
+--------+--------+
81
71
55.1
1511
100.0
OF
Val ue
Cit i - Squ IIF'e
Pears?n
Lik.liltoQd Ratio
"ante!-H,ensze 1 til st fo,.
lir.,r ,ssoci.tion
12.41339
12.61244
6.54343
MinieulII Ellpect.d Frequency 3.595
C.lls _ith =lIpected Fr.Quency < 5 -
Nu.ber of "is1in9 Obst,.vations:
59
11
51gnif1ca"c.
GQP~09 :::>
3
3
1
2 OF
8 (
.00555
.01053
H.Ot)
APPENDIX B, TABLE 7
14-"e,,- ~ 1
C~C~':.lB~
~PSS
10:l8:33
on TAURUS::
VAC/VMS Site
fAClLTY TEACMIHG INTERNATIONAL
Q5_2
by
COLeR
INTEREST
CCLOR
Count
I
Ro. Pct laEIGE
Col Pct I
tlHITE
2
Total
51.3
48.7
26.8
24.2
--------+--------+--------+
1
20
19
Q5_2
RE5PEC1EO
V=~Y
22.2
R(SF~CT
I
"I
)
~ E~P:
NCIT AT IIll
4
I
[aNT !thC:w
-
39
+--------+--------+
I
H
I
16
l.
sn~~wHAT
Irfo.
1
I
Colu .. n
lota\
73.3
~8.9
I
I
60
37.3
26.1
22.5
+--------+--------+
7
3
10.0
1.B
30.0
4.2
lE.S
21.1
63.5
46.5
55.9
44.1
10
6.2
+--------+--------+
19
33
S2
32.3
+--------+--------+
90
11
"161
100.0
OF
Val ue
H.4483"8
Pear~on
Li~~lihoed
Rati~
Mantel-HiEns,,_l tPit for
lirfar cS'Oci3tion
Minieu," EJlPllcted Fr"q"enc), Cell~
.it~
=JI;l~ctld
freQuency
<
60
lE.82782
3
l
5.20058
1
<:;~
.00071
.02258
4.410
5 -
1 OF
8 (
12.5U
APPENDIX B, TABLE 8
-
•
14-May.. n
10:26:34
C~
OSSUDS
SPSS VAX/VMS Site
F'CULTY DOING INTER SERVICE
~5_3
C[LOR
Count I
Roe Pct I BEIGE
Col Pet I
I
1
V':;/iY
RE~PEC1EO
2
SIH'EWHAl
R~5
HCT
3
t.lJT AT 'LL
(OLOR
Colu.n
Total
I.,
2
5.'!.6
16.9
46.4
18.3
68.2
33.7
31.8
19.7
TE.5
14.~
23.5
5.6
43.1
34.8
56.3
56.3
55.6
44.4
28
17.5
...
27.5
11
10.6
+--------+--------.
40
31
+--------+--------+
89
11
Chi-Squ,r.
71
44.4
160
100.0
Val u.
P"arson
Likelihood Ratio
"'antel-H ... n'izel
t.~t
INTEREST
WHITE
+--------+--------.
4
13
CONT KNOW
Vf'S'I5.3
'il9. 1 of 1
+--------.--------.
14
30
~ESPE
4
-
by
--------+--------+--------.
1
15
13
Q5_3
I
on TAURUS::
fo,.
~.9E774
3
10.22810
3.00670
1
lir4"I" lssociiltion
1.544
(
61
OF
)
Significance
APPENDIX B, TABLE 9
on TAURUS 1:
Q5_Z
FACULTY Tr.ACHING
caun\ I
Q19
COLLEGE
Pige 1 of 1
Q19
Ro. Pc t ICCLUGE
Col Pct 10 F • 5' ,
1
1
.RCHITEC BUSINESS FINE ART SCIENCE
lURE
I
/
S
TEAC HE RS
'HUMUI
Z
I
3
I
4
1
5
12.8
12.8
I
COLLEGE
~
IOu
ITo t. 1
--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
511151
IE
EI39
Q5_Z
1161
RESPEClEO
I 15.4 I
Yi:~Y
Z
S'HEWHAT
RE~PECT
,3
~~,
by
IHTERNITIO~Al
~ESPf
AT ' l l
4
I caNT KIItW
.-
Colnn
, 0 til
I
24.0
1
62.5
I
I
2.6
3.1
I
I
41.7
I
I
41.C
24.2
I
I
15.8
36.0
I
I
3.5
25.0
I
I
]3.3
10.4
I
I
3.5
16.7
I
I
H.!!
31.!
I
I
30.0
12.0
I
I
I
7
15.2
28.0
Z.2
12.5
6
13.0
22.2
I'
5
I 10.9
I 41.7
16 .4
i • 3'
17 • 8
7. '}
I
I
.~.1
1.C
2!.E
I
I
~1.5
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
I
'I
2
I
19 I
2
I
21
I
4 I
I
I
51
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
I
I
!
3
50. Cl
H. C
7.1
+--------+--------.--------t--------+--------+--------.
1
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
25
8
21
12
6E
14
43. 4
~
•,
l(
152
C• 0
OF
Chi-Squcra
28.59729
30.01205
.179 56
P ... r'>on
likelihood lIatio
l4ilnte1-H •• n'>zel test for
lir •• r
1!.4
42.9
C:::UI!P
15
15
1
.67115
fssoc1.tjo~
"ini.u .. e.PJc"t'ld Frequency C9115 with ::lCllected Frequency
<
Number of Missing Observltions:
62
.526
5 -
17
14 OF
24 (
5il.H)
APPENDIX B, TABLE 10
-
l .. -'iCy- J 1
10: ze: J",
Q6_~
C~CS:;T~:~
SPSS VAX/VMS Site
IS~P
;NCCURlGEO
by
on lAURU5::
C19
'
Q19
Count
Ro. Pet ICCLLEGE JRCHITEC
Col Pct 10F JStT . TlIRE
I
1 12
•
BUSINES~
FIf;E jilT SClENCE lEACHERS
fa HUMANl
':0.
COLLEGE
3,41
51
6
I Tc181
.S
--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
1
6
5
13
5
2f
Ie
YES
9.2
30.0
z
NO
--
~5.)
CCLLfGf
,
1.
VMS
Ccluwn
20.0
83.3
52.0
7.7
50.0
40.0
45. e
65
50.0
15.4
!!~. ~
+--------.--------4--------+--------.--------.------~-+
14
I
12
5
31
21.5
1.5
18.5
7.7
7e.1l
H.7
48.0
50.0
+----~---+--------+--.-----+--------+--------+--------.
Total
20
6
2S
10
57
12
130
4.6
19.2
7.7
43.B
~.2
lCO.O
Value
p"ar!on
Lik.lihood Ratio
t.~t
65
5 O. 0
15.4
Chi-SQUlre
Mantel-~.En~z.l
7.7
OF
1l.US60
12.50358
2.02029
10r
s
.0~941
r;
1
.02850
.15521
lin.ar association
"in1.ue expected FreQuency C.ll~ wit~ e.~.ct4d FreQuency
<
63
3.000
5 -
2 OF
Signi1ic8llce
12 ( 16.1U
APPENDIX 8, TABLE 11
14-HfV-1~
10:Z(I:3'1
06_5
HEA~D
C J: C~:iT ;.., ~
SPSS VAX/VMS Site
OF VIENNA CEhlER
0"
~1'
by
Q19
Count
I
Roa Pct ICCLL.EGE .RCHIlEC
Col Pet 'OF ASH lURE
I
1
1
2
,....
TAURUS::
COLLEGE
p•
eUSINES~
.,e
1 ef 1
lEACHERS
FINE aRl SCIENCE
S ' HUMINI COLLEGE
3141
Ii
o.
t:
I let.l
12
9.5
I 10C.C
~4.6
51
--------4--------+--------+--------+ ________ 4________ 4--------4
1
I
I
,
16
I
7
12.1,
5.6
69. E
I 100.0
21
16.7
75.0
I
I
30.4
9
1.1
75.0
61
H.4
cH.1l
I
I
13.0
26.1
25.0
9.0
I
I
11.1
4S.0
126
Z,.--------+--------.--------+--------+--------+--------4
. 7 I
1
Ill!!
I
I
W)
130.4
I
Colu.n
lotal
30.4
25.0
15.4
4.7
18.8
V.lue
12.39068
14.54517
1.25208
~at1o
•• nsl.l test fo~
lin •• ,. .ssociation
M~nt.l-~
Minieum Expected F,.equency -
Cell!
.it~
23
'15.4
I
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------4--------+
23
7
28
12
67
12
-.--------Pea,.son
likltlihood
I
I
Expected FreQuency
<
OF
')
S
1
1.081
5 -
Nu_be,. of Missing Obse,.vations:
20
64
5 OF
12 ( 41.H)
8.1
149
ltO.O
Siqnific.nee
-----------.02981
.01249
.OCHS
APPENDIX B, TABLE 12
-
..
'
Cf<O.i:.iTA,)
. 14-'to1'Y- '1
SFSS
10: Z S: 3"
C6_~
;
~~CCURAGED
VAX/VMS
VIEH~A
.
Site
CENTER
'119
I .
Count
ROl Pct rCCUECE
Col Pct IOF AStT
r
1
....
on TALRUS::
by
C19
eUSIHES~
'RCHJTEC
r
COLLEGE
liow
S
Z
I
--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
1
"
"
11
9
3S
I
E
vr:s
5.8
20.0
1
Cclulln
Total
5.8
80.0
15.9
44.0
I
,
25.0
180.0
1.6
120.0
15.0
3.8
r
r
21.9
56.0
18.8
13.949"32
14.71509
E.Z15Z2
test 10r
association
Mini.ulI Expec1.d Fr.quency C.11$ _itt- ElC~.ct.d Freau.ncy
Mi5~in9
1
69
~1.9
E.l
!8.~.1
54.~
I
I
I
1.8
I
4!.~
I
4.1
25.0
H.l
141.1
9.0
45.1
8.3
64
48.1
133
HO.O
DF
Lik~linood OIatio
M~n'el-~z~n~zel
NUMb,r 01
50.1
+--------+--------+--------f--------+--------f--------.
20
5
25
12
6C
11
Pearson
l~~ea,.
13.0
15.0
leUl
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------.
r
16
1
1
r
14 I
3
I
25
1
5
Chi-Squar.
-
lEICHER~
FINE ART SCIENCE
t HUMAN I
COLLEGF
6
314151
TURE' •
<
Obs.rvations:
2.406
5 -
36
.65
2 CF
5
5
.01593
1
.01224
12 ( 16.10
.011E5
APPENDIX B, TABLE 13
___ ·-
------~l
~e~
llo-'1iy-'lJ
12:11:13
06_1 ?
____________
~~
CROSSlA6S: ~UESTICN 6
SPSS VAX/VMS Sit.
HEIRJ EASl
09
by
ASH lOllR
V~S
on U\lRUS::
5.3
COLLEGE
P.;e 1 of 1
Q19
Count
I
Ro. Pet IC(LLHf
Col Pet 10F aSH
1
I
~
JRCHIl~C
TURE
I
2
8USUlfSS F1HE ART SCIENCE
, HUMaN I
S
5
3
I
I
..
I
T EACHE R5
COLLEGE
6
Iiow
I Tehl
--------4--------4--------4--------4--------4--------4--------4
1.00
3 I
2
1
E
4
I
2.00
18.8
1.3."6
I· 12.5
I 33.3
1".7
BE ...
3.1
66.7
I 20.9
I 100.0
7.8
90.9
22
15.2
6
".1
21
18.6
7.6
16
6.3
37.5
25.C
I
9.1
9.2
ll.f
I
H.l
90.E
1.8
71.4
65
..... 8
14
H5
9.1
lCO.O
11.0
+--------+--------.--·.----4--------+--------.--------+
19
.. I
27
10
I"
59
10
NO
I
I
129
B.O
•--------+--------4---_____ 4________ •________ •________ +
Colu.n
lotal
Chi-SQul,..
V.lue
--------------------
-----------
Pearson
Uk OJlihood RaUo
11.18331
12.06130
.14808
M"ntel-til.nsz,1 test fo,.
Ii,.,.,. .ssoc iation
M inilru. E apeeted F,.eqllency -
Cells witt-
Ex~ected
Frec;uency
<
11
DF
5
5
1
.662
5-
66
5 OF
12 (H.H)
.OHS6
.03396
.1C0~7
APPENDIX B, TABLE 14
-.
.14-'4ily-91
12:11:14
C~OSSTA8S: QUESTICN 6
SPSS VAX'WHS Site
Count
I
~19
on TAURUS::
.
Pet ICCLLEGE • IIC" IlEe 8 USJ NE S! "I Ji EARl S C lEN CE HACHf RS
Ii u
Col Pet ·IOF aStT lURE ' S t HUIUHI ·COlLEGE
6
I let.l
I
l
3141
51
1
1
ROl
--------+--------+--------+--------.--------+--------+--------+
1.00 I
2
I
2 1
1· I
1
lEI
2 1
1
I
Z.OO
14.3
9.1
1
14.3
133.3
I
I
I
I
1
H.1
I
I
I
H.~
I
7.1
9.1
1
,
42.9
9.2
3
2.1
+--------+--------+--------.--------+--------+--------+
19
4
I
27
10
59
10 I
ColUMn
lot ill
14.1
86.4
3.1
66.7
22
15.1
4.1
Chi-SQuir.
--------------------
Hinilu. fap.e1ed Frequency C.ll! .i1~ Ea~eetld FreQuency
I
I
6
20.9
96.4
7.8
'J0.9
45. 1
90.E
28
19.2
11
1.5
65
44.5
--- ..-.---W.lue
P.arson
Lik.UhoCd Ra tio
Hilntll-HllnSztl tlst tor
Ii,. •• ,. .ssoeiation
"is5in~
1
14.~
I
33.31
4.5
I
NUMb.r of
14.3
1
3.6
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
l'
I
I
2 I
NO
') .00
I
I
7.1
19.08211
14.2U68
.05000
<
.123
5 -
Obslrvations:
67
24
11 OF
OF
129
8'.4
1.8
1
71.4'
14
146
S.E
lCO.O
-.. ----------
10
10
.0.!923
.Hlll
1
.8BCl
18 ( 61.U)
APPENDIX B, TABLE 15
14-"Iay-H
10:l8:it6
Cl<QSSTAdS
Q7_S
OF
HB RO
on TAURUSZ:
SPss VAX/V"S Si'.
tNT FESTIVAL
by
COLOR
INTEREST
C[LOR
Ceun'
I
Roe Pc t ,aUG!
Col Pct I
Q7_S
WHITE
Ko.
I
2
Totd
I
1
--------+--------.-----~--+
1
YES
2
NO
Celu.n
Total
I
I
,
80
59 .3
88.9
I
I
I
55
40.7
76.4
I
I
37.0
I
I
63.0
23.6
135
83.3
+--------+--------+
10
17
I
I
11.1
+--------+--------+
90
72
55.6
44.4
Chi-SqUir.
27
16.7
162
100.0
Va 1".
Pear 50'"'
C ont inui 1)1 C orr.ct ion
lik.lihoec Ra1ie
Mantel-!i,en5zel test 10r
linear association
4.50000
3.64S00
4.48805
4.47222
.68
OF
1
1
1
1
.03390
.0~624
.0;413
.OH4S
APPENDIX B, TABLE 16
14-'!.y-'H
10:l8:4 .~
C IiCSSTAiiS
SPss VAXnMS
07_9
OF INT COFFEE
HEJAD
CCLOA
Count I
Ao. Pet UfIGE
Col Pct I
'.',
07_9
,.
YES
on 'AIJIR us: I
Si te
INTEREST
COLOR
by
VMS 115.3
'aile I of 1
WHITE
I
Ro.
·1
2
Total
I
--------.--~-----+--------.
1
2
NO
38
37.3
53.5
40.0
25.6
60.0
46.5
54.8
45.2
102
65.0
+--------+--------+
22
33
I
I
I
J
Colu.n
ToUI
64
62.1
14.4
J
I
+--------+--------+
8t:
71
55
35.0
151
100.0
OF
--
Plla,. son
Continuity Correction
likeIi'l0cc Ratio
Hantel-H,.nszel test for
lin.ar association
7.46245
6.57251
1.48076
7.41492
69
1
1
1
1
.00 630
.0IO!6
.OC6H
.OC641
APPENDIX B, TABLE 17
llo-May-'H
C'<QSSTA:lS
lO:.:!S:!>U
SFSS VAX/VMS Site
C7_11
HEARD CF
~HE"
on
lWC CULT MEET
by
Q19
TAURUS::
COLLEGE
019
I
Ro. Pct ,C(LLEGE
Count
Col Pct • OF
-sn
'RCHIlEC BUSHESS FINE UT SCIENCE TEACHERS
TURE i
S
f. HUMANI
CO\LEGE
Ii n
6
• htd
•
2
3 I
4,
5'
•
1
--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------.--------.
1 I
1 . I
6
21
E
Z
NO
I
15.2
I
13.0
23.1
58.1
I
30.4
•
I
16.2
1
6.1
I
20.2
I
11.1
I
39.4
I
1.1
•
•
U.6
• 100.0
I
16.9
• 100.0
•
59.1
I
5~.~
•
15.9
4.1
11.9
7.6
46
13.0
4E.2
40.9
31.1
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------.--------+
I
16 I
6
I
20,
11
1
39
I
1
I
+--------+--------.--------.--------+--------.--------+
23
6
26
66
13
11
Chi-Square
Value
-----------
Pe~rlion
12.63454
11.58003
3.44813
Lik .. lihood RaHo
Mantel-Haenszel test for
li~ear associatlon
Hini.u. E.pec1ed Freq~e~cy 1.903
Cells .it~ E.~.ct.d Freouency ( 5 -
70
45 • .,
145
lCO.O
Df
5
5
1
4 OF
<;.0
99
tl.3
12 ( 33.3t)
.02706
.0(352
.OOH
APPENDIX B, TABLE 18
,lIt-"1c:y- 11
C~C:;:;T
10:Z~:"'4
SPSS
YES
--------.--------.--------.---~----.--------.--------.--------+
10
2
13
1
1
1
tl
I
I
2.4
19.5
4.9
31.1
24 .4
11.1
6t.7
29.6
16.1
21. ~
20.0
I 31.8
,,
----+--------+
,--.------+--------+--------+--------a
, ,
,
+--------+--------.--·-----t--------+--------t-----·--.
,
+----
2
NO
1
1
15
I
14.9
1
4
4.0
68.2
80.0
22
5
3.5
15.5
-
ViliS VS.3
on TAURUS::
Site
P.ge 1 c f 1
Q19
Count I
Ra. Pet 'C[LlEGE ARCHITEC BUSINESS FlJiE ART SCIENCE TEACHERS
S
(. HUMUI COLLEGE
!'ow
Col Pet lOF ASH TORE .
,
1
E I Tchl
1
2
314151
......
.'
.. ,::.
VA~'VMS
I
I
19
18 .8
10.4
10
9.9
83.3
21
12
8. i
19.0
1
I·
1
41
28.9
+
5
48
41.5
78.7
5.
3~.3
61
H.O
10.6
15
1
1
101
71.1
142
lCO.O
OF
Pearson
Likeli.hood Ratio
M.ntel-H,.nszel test for
lin •• r .ssoci.tion
5
5
1
13.29386
12.23501
.39562
Mini.u. E_pected Frequencr 1.444
Cells _itt' e_s:ect.d Freauene" ( 5 -
Nu.ber of Missing Observltians:
71
21
4
OF
12 ( B.H)
.020B
.{)~1l1
.5t9~6
APPENDIX B, TABLE 19
14-I1C'y-~1
C'C:;ST4JS
1O::?8: .. :>
5FSS VAX/VMS Site
on TAURUS::
VMS V5.3
Q19
taunt I
.
Roe Pet ICCUEGE
Col Pet 10f ASn
1
,
Q7_4
YES
ARCHITEC BUSINESS FINE A.T SCIENCE HACHE liS
Ii n
TURE
I S " t4UMANI COLLEGE
6
,Tchl
,
2'
3
I
4
I
5 I
--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
1 I
11
1
8
3
31
10
I
I
I
Z
11.2
50.0
,
I
1.6
20.0
12.5
29.6
4.7
25.0
48.4
50.0
15.6
1E.9
5.2
80.0
24.7
70.4
11.7
15.0
40.3
50.0
3.9
23.1
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
4
9
11
19
31
3
14.3
50.0
U
45.4
11
54.6
Colu.n +--------+--------+--------~--------+--------+--------+
22
5
27
12
62
13
141
Totill
15.6
3.5
19.1
8.5
H.O
9.2
1CO.O
-
OF
Pea .. son
Likelihood lIa1io
Mant.l-H,.nsz.l test fo ..
lir. .... assoei.tJon
Minieu_ Expee1ed Frequency Cells .i1~ Ex~.cted FreQu.ncy
11.95314
12.45768
2.45716
5
5
.03543
.02903
1
.11695
2.270
< 5 -
Hueb.r of Missing Obs.r".t.1ons:
72
28
2 OF
12 ( 16.U)
APPENDIX B, TABLE 20
-14-MC;V-'l1
'ROS~TAa~
10:28:"B
SPSS VAX/VMS Site
Ql_6
ENCCURAGED FOR
lA~G
on TAURUS::
CLASSES
br
Q19
VMS V5.3
tCLLEGE
Ql9
Pig. 1 of 1
Count I
10. Pct ICCll ECiE ".RCHI Tet BUSINESS FINE ART SCIENCE ' . 1 EACHERS
HUM .... I COLLEGE
Ro.
S
Col Pet Iii F HtT TURE
4
2
5 I
6
1
3
I Total
I
I
I
I
,
I ....
.-
Ql_8
--------+--------+----.---+--------+--------+-_._--._+--------+
18
1
1
2
1
3
E
YES
2
NO
Colu.n
, Total
3.• 2
4. '3
6.5
28.6
9.1
11.1
3.2
9.1
58.1
21.1
lS.4
42.9
19.0
95.1
4.3
11.4
20.1
18.'
8.6
90.9
40.5
12. :3
6.9
51.1
15.6
4.8
18.4
1.5
44.2
9.5
+--------+--------f-------·.--------.--------.-----·--t
5
41
22
24
10
S
+--------+--------+-_.---.-+--------+--------+--------+
23
1
14
27
11
65
Chi-SQUire
-
31
21.1
12.36555
U.4S091
1.71284
5
5
1
1in.a .. Ilsoci.tlon
Mini.u. Expected Fr'QuenCr 1.416
C.l1, _itt ex~.et.d Fr'Qu.ncr ( 5 -
Nu.b.r of Missing Ob ...... tions:
-73
22
141
100.0
OF
Value
Pearson
Likelihood Ratio
M.nt.I-HI.n,z.l t.st for
116
11.9
4 OF
12 ( 33.31)
.03011
.01927
.OCll6
APPENDIX B, TABLE 21
--'''-
---
....
.- -------
14-,'1ay- ) l
C~OSSTA'.>:;
10:':!9:01
5PS5 VAX/VMS 5 ite
01_3
LAC It OF INT
I"'CR
by
on TAURUS: :
'age I of 1
Count
I
Ro. Pet UfIGE
Cal Pet I
I
I. ~.
YERY
WHITE
I
1
Ro.
2
--------+--------+--------.
1
26 I
16
I
09_3
"
HI TE AE 5T
COLOR
C[LDR
I"PDRl ANT
61.9
32.9
I
I
38.1
24.6
I
I
61.2
51.9
I
I
38.8
40.0
I
Totd
42
29.2
+-.------+--------+
41
26
I
I
2
I
SO"EWHn IMPORU I
I
3
NOT IHHRTAfIT
Coluan
Total
-
VMS "5.3
67
46.5
I
+--------+------_
.•
12
23
15.2
65.7
35.4
54.9
45.1
34. :3
+-·------+--------t
79
~5
35
24.3
144
100.0
OF
Pearson
1.90996
Z
Lik~lihood
Ratio
"antel-H,ens,el test tor
lineer association
1.94399
'.39951
2
1
Nu.ber 01 Missing Dbserw,tions:
25
74
.01916
.01884
.02014
APPENDIX B, TABLE 22
----- ---
----~-
--------
,ylO:Z9:04
~
14-11
09_6
1
CROSSTA:!;
on
SPSS YAX/VMS Site
LAO: OF INFO ON PROGRAMS IMPOR
09_6
1t1
2
3
NOl HH(RlUT
Colu.n
Totd
Ro.
Total
34
22.5
41.2
21.2
58.8
23.5
SOI'EWHn 1M' aRT A
INTEREST
WHIT E
--------+--------+--------.
14
1
20
Z
COlCi
'.ge 1 of 1
Cl:lOR
Count I
Ro. Pct 18fIGE
Col Pct I
1
I
YERY IIIFORlUiT
TAURUS::
+--------+--------+
zg
54
I
I
I
83
55.0
I 65.1 I 34.9 I
I 63.5 I 43.9 I
+--------+-----~--+
11
Z3
I
32.4 I
67.6
12.9
I 34.8
+--------+--------+
85
66
43.7
56.3
34
22.5
151
100.0
Val ue
P ell .. son
likelihood Ratio
Mant.l-HI.nsz.l test 10r
lir .... ",oc1~tjon
Mini .u. Expec ted Frequency -
NUMb, .. of Mis.ing Db.trvlt10n,:
75
OF
10.60136
lCl.64355
2
2
~.80930
1
14.861
18
.OC499
.00488
.02831
APPENDIX B, TABLE 23
___________________________
lo:z,:oi
OOSSTA'l.)
SFSS YAX/~~S Site
Qg_~
ACADE"IC
14- M ty-'n
OT~EA
~ESP
~~
_ _ _ 6- _ _
~.
.0_. -
on TAURUS::
INPCR
by
019
VIIS \15.3
COLLEGE
019
Count
Plge 1 of 1
I
,
Ro. Pct ICOLLEGE
Col Pct
IReHITEC BUSINESS FINE ART SCIENCE TEACHERS
IOF "S'T TURE ' S , f'U'UU COLLEGE
h.
I
1
I
,Z
3,
4
I
5
I
6
I Tc t d
--------+--------+----~---+--------+---~---+---------+--------+
1
12
a 1
19
a I
39
e
09_4
VEn IftFCRHfIIT
SO~EWH'"
2 I
INFORl. I
I
:3
NOl
-
IMF(RTA~l
12.8
8.5
48.0
100.0
I
I
20.2
8.5
70.4
66.7
10
1
:3
20.4
40.0
14.3
25.9
6.1
25.0
I
I
41.5
E.!
57.4
51.1
23
46. S
33.e
94
fl.C
E
12.2
42.S
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------.--------.
I
:3
1
1
I .27.3
I 12.0
B.l
B.8
U
44.2
8
2T
12
5.2
17.5
7.8
Chi-.iqu~"e
Pea,. son
likelihood Ra1io
Nantel-Hlenszel test fo,.
Il!ini.u. f.pec1ed F,.equeFlcy -
14
154
HC.O
OF
S ig" i fic.llce
10.61 CJBB
10
1~.32S63
10
1
.3E189
.15865
.9S097
Vil ue
.00013
lirE',. issociatjon
CeUs .i1h Expected Frequency (
11
1.1
9.1
.571
5 -
76
JO OF
18
<
55.n)
APPENDIX B, TABLE 24
-14-MiI),-91
10:;:~:08
Q10
..
CROSSTlSS
SFSS V.X/'"S Sit.
-
on UURUS::
SATIS WITH INTERNATIONALIZATION
by
Ql'
,"S '5.3
COLLEGE
Gl'
Pig. 1 ef 1
I
'.
Ro. Pet ICOLLEGE
Col Pet 10f un
Count
'RC"ITEC 8USINESS fINE ART SCIENCE TEA~HERS
lie.
TURE I i ' MU'''''I COLLEGE
111,21
314151
6 1 Teta1
010
--------+--------+----~---+-----~-+--------+--------.--------+
1 I
2 I
I
,3 J I
1
I
4'" 1
1
1
VERY SnISFJEO
I
2
I.
I
3~,0"'
'.0
I
1
11.1· I
16. a
I
I
I
I
ztt.o
20.0
I
10.0
9.1
I
I
40.0
6.1
I
I
I
I
10
~.6
+--------.--------4--------.--------+--------4--------+
6
10 I
20
8 I
2 I
4
I
I
I·
I
50
H.I
I
n.o
I 30.3 I
!l.'
+----.---+--------.--------.--------.--------.----~---+
s
3 I
10
6
5
31
1.1
SO'EWH'l SA1ISfI 1 15.4
9.·2.
I 40.0,
75.0
F AJIll' ! ATI S F IE 0
4
1
NOl AT All HTIS I
-
5
NO INTBEST
Colu.n
10ta1
I
3
14.3
12.0
I
I
40.0
I
8.0
4 .. 0
25.0
8.0
36.4
I
40.C
65
4:!.C
4
1
11:
3
21
19·9
4.8
41.6
15.2
14.3
21.4
I:!.C;
16.8
9.1
.--------+--------.--------+-----~--+--------+--------+
2
2
1
40.0
7.4
'.
5
20.0
1.5
3.3
43.7
J( C. C
+--------t--------.--------+--------+--------.---·----.
14
27
H
25
8
11
16.6
Chi-SQUire
--------------------
7.3
151
OF
Value
-----------
P.1'Irson
lik.lihood RiJ1io
'hnt.1-H •• nsul te 5t for
lir.l.r Issoe iat jo"
''linieu. Expected Fr,q",,,cy CeUs w1t" EJCp,ct,d FreQu,ncy
17.9
5.3
13.66074
16.21922
.OOU3
<
HUlaber of 'h551n9 Obslr"ation.:
.265
5 -
18
77
22 OF
20
20
1
30 ( 73.3U
• 847 27
.70293
.H69l
APPENDIX B, TABLE 2S
20-M 'v-'1
15: 33:50
Q12
1t1
CROSST.as fOI GUESTIOI 12
SPSS YAX'YNS Slto
COLOI
'.g.
COLO.
.
Count I
Roo Pet lUlU
Col Pet
•I
Q12
INfUSIU
1
•
•
IOOITIC ..
'.
MAJOR
4
fOREIG" UN'
5
OTHER
I
2
61.T
11.3
4t
5'.6
25.4
•
•
11.3
35.7
I
I
42.4
27.9
25
51.1
13.0
I
I
I
11
43
41.9
14.0
13.4
12.
.
n.1
26.4
..------..--------.
+--------+--------.
26
37
I
U
41.3
51.' 20.2
•I 19.2
+-------+-----•
3
•
72.7
4.1
Colu.n
Total
10.
Totd
I
+--------+--------.
36
I
I
I
I
3
of 1
"HITE
--------+--------+--------.
46
1 I
14 I
2
--
on TAUIUSIa
•
I
I
19.6
11
3.4
27.3
2.3
+--------+--------+
193
129
40.1
59.9
Chi-SQUire
HZ
100.0
Ydue
Pearlon
Likelihood I.tio
".ntel-H.onlzol test for
li~o.r ,lloci.tion
OF
J.1I061
1.21782
.00019
Minioue Expected frequonc, 4.40J
Celli .1th Expected FroQuenc, ( 5 -
78
"4
1
1 Of
10 ( 1O.0t>
Significonco
.IU21
.87516
.919119
APPENDIX B, TABLE 26
Zo-".y-91
CIOSSTA8S
15:34:20
SPSS 'A.,'"$ Site
012
by
QUESTID. 12
f~R
.n
TA'URUS: I
cn
Cl19
t ....
•
1
JNFUSICIII
l
ADUlICtl
3
.. AJOR
4
fOREIG. Ln'
-
hOI 1 af I
Ceunt 1
••• 'ct tASn
C.1 'ct I
5
•
I
I
1
15
13.2
42.'
I
1
1.1
20.0
7
6.1
21.0
1
11
14.9
32.7
I
I
I
10
1.1
]5.7
I
10.0
l2.1
I ll.3
1 32.1
I
I
1.5
21.4
I
I
42.5
24.3
t.l
16.0
25.6
21.l
I
I
i.o
I
I
41.'
Jl.'
1.2
11.5
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
114
12
lC.5
41.4
1
I
H.'
I 1G.G
I
10
25.'
53
46.!
]1.'
I
•
I
11.6
14.]
I
U.l
I
21.6
I
+--------.--------.--------+--------+--------.--------.
•
5
I
411
I
3
1
u
2
I
I
10.1
4l
4.1
6.'
13.'
1.2
19.1
+--------+----...
-.--------.--------+--------+----.---.
I
I
I'
5
1
I
6
3C
I
I
9.1
21.4
49.2
1
61
1 22.. I ao.o
Il.5 I
21.4, 11.2
+.----·
.
--+---.
••
--4--------+------..
--------t--------+
1
I
1
•
!
3
27.3
10.1
.,
u
Ch1-Squne
-------------------•• t10
",nte1-H,.n.zel i •• t to,.
11".,,. •••• c1.tjo~
Llke11ho.~
U.J
l.6
14C1
21
45.3
U.446OZ
zo
.61860
1 •• 02119
ZQ
1
.10071
.'90
< 5·
79
3011
HCI.C
S1o"tUc."ce
.onn
-
2.
~.4
3.~
DF
'due
, ••,..on
M1niou. e.pected F,.equ.ncr Cell • • 1t~ E.,ected freQuenc1
52
16.1
'.1
I
11
t
I
I
I
+--------t-··-----·--------+--------+--·-----+--------+
I
Coluon
lotd
I
+--------.--------+--------+._------.--------+--------.
I
1
I
I
11 I
6 I
34 I
• I
1
OTHER
A,'ICHITEC IUSINESS fINE AIT SCIENCE TUCHUS
TURe
S , lIuun COLlEGE
508
f
I leta)
12
II
4,5'
11 Of
30 ( 36.7U
.51597
APPENDIX B, TABLE 27
J
....
.
~..., ~J' ~,
~
--
on TAURUS::
lO:Z~:SIt
08_2
FAC USE
I~CREASE
INT UNDERSTANDING
CCLDR
WHITE
2
1
i
Ro.
I Tot.!
--------+--------+--------+
1
Sf
n I
08_2
VEAY I"FORTINT
I
J
39.6
33.3'
7.4 I
66.7
19.7
60.4
92.6
144
'7.3
!!IO.3
+--------+-----._-+
21
"
14
SO"EWH.l IHFORTA I
I
INTE~EST
COLOR
'lige 1 of 1
Count I
Ro. Pet I !!lUGE
Col Pet I
I
br
VMS V5.3
11
12.T
+--------+--------.
71
43.0
165
100.0
Valu.
Pearson
5.48383
Corrpction
Likelihocc Ra1io
Mant.l-Haensz.l test 10r
li"~ar association
4.434 61
Nu~b.r
4
Continuit~
~.45809
~.45059
of Hissing Observations:
80
OF
1
1
1
1
.01919
.03522
.0194 '3
.01956
APPENDIX B, TABLE 28
--- -14-'1
iY-·~
1
"- ---...,.-.-. -
'-~---'
--
OOSSlA3S
SPSS VAK/VMS Site
10: 2 e:
51)
Q8_5
FAC USE PERSONAL GRCWTH
--
-
on TAURUS
by
019
a:
COLLEGE
Pigi 1 01 1
019
Count
I
TfAC Hf RS
Ro. Pc t ICOllEGE ,RCHITEC BuSINESS fINE ART SCIENCE
Col Pet 10 F • St T TURf!
5n
S , hU'UNI COllEGE
I
1
6
I Tete 1
I
2
3141
51
,.":.
--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
1
16
6
10
9
43
11
08_5
Y::RY UOFCRTUIT
16.8
64.0
6.3
75.0
10.5
3B.5
11.5
24.0
3.8
25.Q
30.8
61.5
9.5
15.0
45.3
64.2
lJ.t
84.6
5.8
25.0
44.2
34.3
:!.e
15.4
95
t2.'.i
+--------+--------.--------.--------+--------+--------.
6
2
16
1
3
2:!
2
SO~EWHAT
2 I
IHFORTA I
I
3
NOT I"'HRTUT
Colu.n
Tote1
•
52
:!4.4
+--------.--------.--------.--------+--------+--------.
I
3
I
J
1 75.0
I 12.0
4
,25.0
I
1.5
2.6
+--------+--------.--------.--------.--------+--------+
25
8
26·
12
61
13
5.3
16.6
Chi-Squire
..-
I
I
17.2
Ve1ue
Pee,.son
Likelihood h t 10
Men til-He. nszel te st fo,.
Ii,. •• ,. Issociat10"
22.30758
. 19.79889
2.60168
Minieull Expected F,.equency .212
CeUs _it .. Expected Frequency ( 5 -
NUllb,,. of Missing Ob .. ,.utions:
81
18
, OF
7.9
44.4
E.E
151
1((.C
OF
S i ;n 1 fie en c e
10
10
1
.01561
18 ( 50.0t)
.03121
.10615
APPENDIX B, TABLE 29
14-'1ay-~1
C;;OS.STltl~
10:29:10
5FSS
Q13
~AX/V"S
on U URUS::
Site
SSU PROVIDE FloC INCENTIVES
by
Q19
YMS
COLLEGE
•
Pig- 1 af 1
Q29
Caunt
I
Ro. Pet IC CLLEGE
Col Pet 10F Hn
Q13
I
1
I
I
17.9
TEACHERS
AReHITEC BUSINESS fIN! ART SCIENCE
~n
T UR E S
, to UM "" I COLLEGE
12
314151
E 1 latal
--------+---_._--+--------.--------.--------+--------.--------+
24
1
6
1 I
10
6
3
TES
Z
NO
3
I CONT "hel/
Ccluen
latal
10.1
75.0
40.0
10.7
21.4
5.4
25.0
56
!E.l
12.5
50.0
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
t
5 I
2 I
11
I
6
I
25
I
4
I
I
I
9.4
I
20.0
I
1
21.1
I
3.8
25.0
I
I
20.8
39.3
I
I
11.3
50.0
I
I
47.2
36.8
I
I
1.5
I
ZS.t
I
41.3
I
~.!
I
53
:4.2
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
I
10 1
1
11
I
3
1'J
I
!
1
I
-
~5.3
4C.0
I
I
23.9
139.3
'6.5
I 25.0
27.9
121.4
18.1
7.7
43.9
S.C
46
'S.l
I
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
25
8
28
12
U
14
1E.l
5.2
Chi-SqUire
OF
Pearson
Likelihocd Ratio
"antel-Hi!&!n'izcl test for
lirEEr cssociatio~
"inltuM E.pected Freque~cy Cells wit~ EKpected Frequency
1S5
lCC.C
<
82
2.314
5 -
.11592
10
13.9H27
15.80200
.20982
B OF
18
10
.lC544
1
.64691
<
44.H)
APPENDIX B, TABLE 30
-
--'0-,.. ,,-91
U:1 7:23
QUESTION '4
S'SS
v,.'Y"5
on TAURUSn
51t.
• • •* • • • • • • • • • • • • • , •
I L , 5 I 5
a ,
ColI ~oen. ond Stonder. O•• lotlon.
Variabl ••• Q14_1
Sll •• Y INCRE'SE IMPOR
FICTOR
caae
"oon St ••
019
011
Q19
011
Q19
~19
e
I • • • • • • • • • • • • •
•
.5 percent Conf. Intor"fl
•
19
2
19
:I.UO
1.129
.000
1.177
1.035
.1".2
.1.500
1.128
1.ll.
]I
J.U'
1.Ul
U
2.94'
•• 000
3.05'
~. 157
l.e5]
3.472
4.141
3.290
3.939
3.216
2.664
-4.153
2.318
U
N
2
19
•
2.EO 9
6
2.49 ~
2.0'> 1
92
2.1-00
38
95 ,.rcent Cant. Int.rwf)
J .492
4.000
J.620
2.403
•• 000
2 •• '5
2.)8 ,
2.47 J
1.053
,•
4.115
~. 413
J.'4J
2.11 ~
J.180
10NU S I "'ORT ANT
CODe
Q19
COllE"
Q19
'.C~I'EC
Q19
8USINESS
FINE liT
Q19
Olq
SCIENCE
019
TeACHERS
For entire .Iople
Vori.ble •• 014_4
FACTOq
CODE
019
a•••
I
Std. D•••
I.,
019
J
TENURE IM'ORTANl
".on
011
COLLE'!
Q19
,.CHITEC
Q19
IUSINESS
019
fINE
Ql.
SCIENe!
019
TEICHERS
For .ntire .oople
Variobl ••• Q14_1
FACTDR
•
l •• 7.
l.lll
1.500
l.195
].ll5
2.195
].000
CODE
I
1.ll4
.707
1.197
•• 16
1. lO'J
.194
1.14'
COlLE'1
ARCNITEe
SUSINESS
FINE •• ,
SCIENCE
TEACHERS
For .ntiro •• opl.
Yorioble •• C14_2
FA CTO;f
,
N
2.263
].000
l.526
l.UO
l.553
l.333
l.SZ2
SPECIAL TUVEL IUDII
II.on
CDlLEGE
"'CHIlEt
.933
.000
1.l6.
1.165
1.005
1.033
1.064
st..
19
1.813
2
3.GO~
19
•
1.917
1.216
]I
2.222
2.eel
6
2.2 ••
2.301
2.142
92
•
D.".
.96.
2.113
3.(00
95
~ercont
3.0S
3.224
4.411
Conf. Inter".1
I. S 38
1.853
11
2
.707
EFFECT •• Q19
Hulti"ori.to To.t. of Sltnlflconc. (S • 4. " • 0, N • 40 1'2)
Tost Nae.
Pl.lhh
Hotellin!!.
.18995
.20430
.I2U6
.097H
Wilks
Ro"s
,
""po t"~ Of
Errcr OF
.15150
.132H
. . . . 16
28.00
20.00
20.00
3 ••• 00
326.00
216.23
I,"ro ••
Vol".
Si<;. Clf f
EFFECT •• 01~ (Cant.)
Uniwori.te F-tosts .it~ (5.'6) D. F.
Variable
<:.14_1
014_2
014_3
014_4
Hypctll. 55
Error SS
"),poth. "·S
1.05521
4.78089
E.!0T40
1.91159
112. '0 132
111.94737
96.64912
100.57675
1.41104
.95618
1.2614.
.39552
CoIl Mo.ns ond Sto"derd O•• latto". (Cont.)
V_riabl ••• ~14_4
SPfCIIL TRIVEl 'LlOIl
FA'10R
CaDE
II.on It.. 0 ....
~19
IUSlNfSS
FINE H1
019
SCIENCE
011
TEACHEIS
For ent,ir • •• opll
1.19'
1.U5
1.612
1.ln
Qli
-
1. Ul
1.ln
.74.
1.125
1.169
1.062
Error "S 51<;. Clf f
F
.~e(
.CHf~
1.312fl
1.30111
1.lll'3
1.16~50
II
19
,."•
6
92
.6DC .73455
.355 .12249
.£Pi .33IH
95 perclnt Conf. Inter •• l
1.31 f
1.C03
1.262
.607
1.44 J
2.472
2.241
2.COl
1.060
1. f83
-
83
- --
APPENDIX B, TABLE 31
------_._---- ------14-luy-H
H:Z~:l1
~16
OCSST A:jS
SPss
OYE'SEAS TEACHIN'
by
w.. s
on TAURUS::
YAX/'"S Site
019
~5.3
COLLEGE
019
Page 1 of 1
Count I
Roe Pe1 ICCLlEGE UCHITEC BUSINESS fItif ART SCIENCE HICHE!!!
S
, HUMINI (OllEGE
Col Pet 10F Isn TURE ;
6
I TClhI
I
2
3 I
4
I
5 I
I
1
.0.
016
YES
--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
1 I
12
6 I
1
6
31 I
12
I
I
I
Z
NO
Co lu.n
Total
15.0
48.0
1.5
15.0
.17.1
I
I
I
I
8.8
25.0
1.5
50.0
46.3
54.4
2.6
21.6
1.9
40.8
3.9
52.0
25.0
15.0
50.0
45.E
2C.C
16.0
5.1
11.9
1.7
43. t
9.6
15.0
ec.c
80
!1.3
I
I
+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+--------+
13
2
21
6
31
3
16
48.7
+--------+--------.--------.--------+--------f--------.
25
8
28
12
68
15
Chi-SQu.re
Val"e
--------------------
------ .. ----
Pearson
Likelihood RaHo
Mantel-HlenSZll test for
lir.ar association
14.81663
2.72654
Mini.u. expected FreQuency 3.891
C.lls _itt- e.~ected FreQuency ( 5 -
Nu.ber of Missing Obs.rwations:
84
13
OF
5
5
1
1!.EE835
2 OF
156
lCO.O
12 C 16.n)
.01090
.oel7U
.OS8E9
APPENDIX C
EXHIBITS
-
85
APPENDIX C, EXHIBIT 1
QUESTION 1: OTHER CATEGORY
1. In your opinion, which of the following areas are part of international education?
area studies
art, music, drama
Audiovisual and book materials; student and faculty recreational travel to foreign locations; pcnpals; international conferences
exchange program - Korean
facility, lectures series, special events, English lang. program, visiting foreign professors, grants, etc.
guest lectures
interacting with foreign/student faculty
international settings and exhibitions at BSU
International Travel, without formal educational objectives
meetings, conferences w/ international theme
-
most anthropology classes
required multi<ultural courses
social activities (dinners) etc.
special events
study of immigrant groups in the U.S.
travel abroad, reading about
Travel opportunities - e.g. Polyark, etc.
visiting foreign scholars
visiting faculty give insight
-
86
-
APPENDIX C, EXHIBIT 2
QUESTION 3: EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT ANSWER
3. President Worthen announced internationalization as a university goal. How
dedicated do you feel the university's top leadership is to international education? vd =
very dedicated, sd = somewhat dedicated, or nd = not dedicated at all. Give some
evidence to support your answer.
nd
our dean is afraid of other cultures
nd
anthropology ignored as integrating discipline, foreign students not given fmandal support from BSU (only the rich can come)
Worthen has bistory of PR approach - i.e. assert, but do not support
nd
budget
nd
Amount of resources allocated for this purpose are insignificant compared to expenditures made to some other purposes.
nd
People of Indiana do not want it! They do not want their tax dollars spent for it. They are very concerned about local & state
events.
nd
lip service means little
nd
I'm just a cynic.
nd
I have not heard President Worthen's announcement re:
nd
no commitment-We need to "put some money where our mouth is." Instead of continually building new sport centers, we should
build an international center to house all international functions, students, and students of foreign languages. We need a center!
Also, we need to establish a foreign language requirement for all students (2 yrs.), such as all good universities have, i.e. Purdue,
Indiana, DePauw, Wabash, U1inois, Michigan, etc...
nd
no support for an intI. student exchange program with which I was involved.
nd
lack of university fmancial support. Foreign study classes which "make or break" based on enrollment is not the norm for real
universities.
sd
a leading question as it is written. They provided funding for me to go to an international conference.
sd
Worthen's public statement
sd
at the moment it seems largely a slogan
sd
dedicated to select areas and "favorite people."
sd
international component in general studies
sci
It is not clear from Dr. Worthen's rhetoric what he means by internationalizing BSU.
5d
Canada year
5d
do not see a big push in this area
sci
CanadafEurope yr.
sd
have offices denoted to area
87
-
-
-
sd
some campU&-wide program
sd
if President Worthen is talking about it it must be on the President's agenda
sd
I'm more aware of the inti. thrust within our College which is considerable due to next year's emphasis on Europe.
sd
focus years
sd
they do not publicly state this goal sufficiently
sd
recent budgeting problems have decreased dedication. I am a member of the Provost appointed committee to internationalize
BSU
sd
various international programs and exchange programs
sd
Exchange programs
sd
There is little evidence to SUPPOlt th.:ir dedsions
sd
office at intI. Programs - Limbird
sd
Committees are set up to study subject// People are brought in//studying programs abroad//Martin Limbird on board//Canada
yr. -Europe 92 year.
sd
lack of financial support
sd
just saying something doesn't make it so. However, Dona Holman and her staff do a great job.
sd
I see no evidence to support dedication
sd
Policy does not make it easy for faculty member to do an exchange
sd
BSU has a center for inti. programs, and London Center, Vienna Center, Westminster College - and an Asia (Chinese, Japanese,
Korean) program, and Ctr. for Transnational Business
sd
not much visible support, fmancial or verbal, is in evidence
sd
in word only
sd
the SANNO project is one manifestation
sd
they are pursuing through the "years of" type of activities
sd
many other issues are also priority items - some more of a priority
sd
just a feeling, no evidence for any answer
sd
we do have several events pertaining to inti. educ.
sd
hosting dinners together with faculty wives, opening their house to foreign students/wives.
sd
They don't allocate necessary $$, either at university or college level
sd
it would benefit the university; but it is not a primary mission
sd
Europe year $, but fac. development $ to re-structure EUro-<lriented courses is lacking. Commitment
sd
center for inti. programs, agreements with universities in other countries
sd
The are insufficient funds available to support visitors from other countries
sd
little support for faculty to be involved overseas unless very high up in the hierarchy
88
= $!
-
-
sci
Supporting Canada -BSU- Europe years, et-c.; Faculty exchange- Student Exchange Programs
sci
Ideas without bucks as usual Read the newspapers - this is a desirable fate, but we will be struggling to maintain "national"
content in the coming years.
sci
Asia Exchange prgm. I house etc. But I don't see a strong dedication to involve everybody
sci
We have foreign students and we have a "Canada" year etc., and a West Civ. course but need heavy stuff here to overcome
"Indiana Provencialism."
sci
Canada year, european year, london center
sci
3 hr. req. in General studies, no foreign language requirement, no regional geography required-international studies requirements
are pretty soft
sci
we hear it discussed, but there is limited opportunity for participation, and only minimal financial support
sci
The thrust is now to bring capita1ist projects to other countries. To decrease ethnocentrism is not a goal. It should be
sci
junk mail to faculty
sci
Europe year
sci
Distribution of classes with international content
sci
much is announced, little is followed up
sci
he directed the Provost to protiuce a plan for internationalization of the curriculum
sci
participated in Westminster Exchange, International Coffees.
sci
I've heard intI. educ. mentioned by President Worthen. Nothing other than that.
sci
London Center
sci
have been hearing a lot more about it lately
sci
all I see is "lip service"
sci
my answer is an opinion, I'm not sure I have evidence. It is more of a feeling or impression.
sci
study abroad programs, but no language requirement
sci
I know nothing more than the above statement
sci
I've been a senior Fulbright prof. twice; I got support, etc.
sci
Europe focus year
sci
The tight economic situation is preventing BSU's ability to put many of its intentions into practice
sci
news reports have publicized attention to Canada year and Europe year, etc...
sci
my dept. doesn't show much, but I have seen people from other countries giving talks or the international dinners.
sci
Centers such as the European study center
sci
Europe yr. Canada yr.,
sci
support for international faculty travel
sci
Not required for an "opinion"
89
-
-
sd
we get an occasional memo
sd
existence of inti. committee in college of business
sd
other than the one shot at Europe year little seems to be done.
sd
Canada year and Europe year projects; London center
sd
There are foreign students here. Many students/faculty study in England
sd
Faculty exchange; years dedicated to relationship with certain countries
vd
Planned Europe Year activities; visiting profs from other countries; foreign films shown by University FIlm Committee;
Sabbatical Prc'grams for faculty; London Center; Vienna Center; trips to Greece for students
vd
General comments made and actual fISCal support given
vd
University committee, position
vd
a blue ribbon panel was formed to develop a formal proposal for changes to reach the mission statement goal
vd
Global Inti. Studies Faculty and center for intI. programs, several intI. speakers on campus this semester
vd
International Programs, our overseas centers, exchanges. The answer/evidence is so obvious I cannot believe you asked such a
stupid question.
vd
London/Vienna programs
vd
Faculty & student exchange
vd
London Centre; other study abroad programs, Europe Focus Year, Foreign Exchange
vd
By the support given Dr. M.H. Limbird dir. IntI.
vd
increasing number of opportunities (sites) for students to study abroad; more international speakers on campus; opportunities for
faculty travel by study abroad
vd
audiovisual and book materials; student and faculty recreational travel to foreign locations; penpals; international conferences.
The numbers of special speakers from abroad who come to BSU each year.
vd
Some have been allocated; The International Europe yr. is receiving great emphasis; exchange faculty programs have increased;
no. of international students has increased
vd
Programs developed - support in both word and deed
vd
memorandum; interoffice leaflets
vd
Europe year
vd
support of Canada year, European year, support of speakers from abroad, BSU-study abroad programs, invitations to other
foreign universities to set up exchanges
vd
increasing faculty exchange activities and foreign professors and students
vd
publicity, exchange agreements, guest lecturers, foreign students, International House
vd
"global studies" requirement of general studies; Canada Year; International Year
vd
establishment of blue ribbon panel on internationa!izjng curriculum; appointment of Limbird
vd
London Center/ Vienna, Canada yr. etc.
•
90
-
vd
Canada yr. Europe yr.
vd
comments from others
vd
The ongoing study abroad programs for students at the London Center, with faculty support provided for the program.
vd
Expansion of inti. programs staff; addition of Vienna program; new E. European studies a lot in Pol Sci.; Canada Year- Europe
year program.~; faculty development grant for my language study abroad
vd
I have seen and heard numerous promotions for international content and programs
vd
support of initiatives such as Canada yr. and Europe yr.; university support of faculty/student exchanges
vd
Formation of intI. programs - Director
vd
Europe yr, Canada yr. Student exchange program
vd
The current effort in the school of business to develop a major in international business
vd
Far East Student and Faculty Exchange Program; Sister University Programs with International Universities, etc...
vd
Canada year 90/91; Europe year 91/92
vd
strong support of international programs office and international house
vd
Europe year; IntI. speakers; IntI. exchanges; Global studies requirement
vd
various programs that already exist that support intI. educ.
vd
inti. yr. activities - e.g. Canada, Europe
-
-
91
APPENDIX C, EXHIBIT 3
QUESTION 6: OTHER CATEGORY
6. Which of the following international programs have you heard of before? Of those
programs--of which you are aware--have you encouraged your students to participate in
them?
Asia summer tour/teaching abroad
Asia
Asian Exchange
Ball State-Munster Student Exchange Program//Fulbright Program
Cameroon
Chichester exchange
Chichester
Chichester exchange
-
Chichester
China Travel
China/Korea exchange
China
China trip
ChinafFar East Asian Exchange Trip
China Exchange//Korea Exchange
Chinese/other//asian tours
CIEE
Classics field study, polyark, etc..
Costa Rica field study
Costa Rica, Canada Field Study
E. Asia Tour
East Asia Study Exchange
East Asian Exchange
-
EDEL-O
92
,-
\
EDEL-O
Educational tours, Study in Hungary (Hungarian govt. program)
Elem. Ed Overseas prgm.
Excel program - (the oldest in the university)
Exchange with various Korean universities
Faculty exchange two leaves/took a student to go (West Africa)
Far East Exchange
Field trips and study abroad programs of college of AJchitecture and Planning
Fulbright
Jamaica/British Columbia
Japan studies abroad
Korea, China, Brazil
Korean Exchange
Korean
Korean Exchange
-
New program at Crenenzen, Keele (1993)
Nursing Exchange in England; Grad. Student from Egypt
Partners of the American
Polyark
Polyark/Archiba
Polyark
Polyark
Polytechnic in London exchange with nursing
School of Nursing Community Health, Polutechnique of South Bank - London// African Exchange Faculty/ /Partners of America
Study in Spain and Latin America (foreign lang.)
Summer Field Study (Europe)/Asia
T-nat. Business trips
Trips to China
Turkish Exchange
Turkish Program, just developing/SANNO Japanese
-
93
APPENDIX C, EXHIBIT 4
QUESTION 9: OTHER PREVENTIVE FACTORS
9. In your opinion, how important are the following factors in preventing faculty from
participating in international activities?
bealtb problems
bousing in foreign land
laziness-fear of unknown-too mucb trouble
no sense of cultural awareness
otber commitments
univ. makes it too difficult to participate
-
94
APPENDIX C, EXHIBIT 5
QUESTION 12: OTHER STRATEGIES FOR INTERNATIONALIZATION OF THE
CURRICULUM
12. Of the following strategies, which method or methods do you think: should be used
to internationalize the curriculum?
add inti. courses/experiences to some major area requirements
build an international center to demonstrate importance and commitment
commit real flnancial resources to a program
create international courses as elcctives
encourage more international student enrollment
encourage foreign language competency
identified as a strategic interest area in the university wide planning document
more international speakers in classes
more overseas study
-.
more study aborad structured in at least cost to students
non euro-american curricula should be introduced
offer student fmancing plan; offer
department~
replacement $
respect foreigners more
95
APPENDIX C, EXHIBIT 6
QUESTION 8: OTHER BENEFITS TO INTERNATIONAL INVOLVEMENT
8. In your opinion, how important are each of the following benefits that faculty could
gain from international involvement?
financial support
Increased recognition for Ball State
knowledge of one's own culture
new friends
research opportunities
understanding of one's own culture
Value for one's students through the experiences
-
96
APPENDIX C, EXHIBIT 7
QUESTION 13: OTHER INCENTIVES FOR INTERNATIONAL INVOLVEMENT
13. Does Ball State provide faculty with incentives for international involvement? Could
you name a few?
academic leaves are granted
Alumni assoc. travel awards, exchange program Westminster College
Asia tour with students
Asian exchange - quite affordable - Alumni Grant - although that
78b
Asian tour
Canada, Europe, Trans natl. business
China trip, London center, on campus programs, etc.
Dr. Kay Wagoner
enrichment, learning, assistance
-
exchange programs
exchanges, etc..
Exchanges
faculty development grants, released time, can influence merit pay
Faculty exchange programs with pay
Faculty exchange with Poland, teach at Vienna center
Far East Study group
Foreign faculty exchanges
Fulbright fellowships, far east trip in May, all of the international programs etc. on campus
funding time (e.g. off of regular load)
Funding - China trip, Exchange program to England
funds, time
grant money to help researeh, teaChing abroad
Grants (study abroad)
host family programs; limited trips abroad; cooperating on sabbaticals
leave/release time
97
-
living arrangements
011
exchanges
London, Vienna center, are desirable opportunities
London center, Travel Abroad grants (alumni), Vienna center
London center
my dept. did, my college did not
None should be needed. Incentive should come from the faculty desiring to go.
nursing exchange, faculty exchange
Polyark, Fulbright, Lc:mdon, Vienna Centers
possibility for being at London or Vienna Centers, alumni travel grant
promotion and tenure weight
provides some $ supportj travel support, educational leaves
released time and travel support
research office-balances Fulbright funding
sabbatical leave
salary while abroad?
scheduling trips and exchange opportunities
-
some - some travel support
some travel $ for presentations & projects
some assistance in travel funds but that is all I'm aware of & that isn't enough. Requires great deal of own personal funds
sometimes. by providing occasionally limited travel funds
subsidized trips to England, Vienna
support for exchange programs and recognition of international achievements
The bureaucracy hinders rather than helps (Business office, etc.)
The ones they provide involve such a financial sacrifice that they are not popular. Others require such language and involved
preparation (unpaid) that is not cost efficient for faculty. They would be better off spending the time on more rewarding endeavors.
to a limited few
travel
travel opportunities, recognition
travel grants
travel opportunity to teach & do research, bringing in scholars for cross fertilization
travel to Korea & China for comparisons and presentations, also Canada
-
Westminster, Vienna Center, Lc:mdon Center
Westminster College Exchange, Study abroad grants
98
r
APPENDIX C, HXHIBfr 8
QUESllQN 14: 0'I1IER TYPES QP INawI1VES WlUCU SHQUID BE PR.oVIDFD
FOR INIERNA'I1QNAL INVQLVEMENT
14. What type of incentives should be provided for international involvement?
ability to teach and l'eSC8rch in the field
assist in the organization of faculty lead student travel for credit
assisting students to pay for study abroad
course load reduction
establishment of an international faculty, such as teacher training faculty or honors college faculty.
faculty leaves, faculty exchange (these should be granted when requested)
funds to hire replacement while faculty member is away.
housing available at sites preferably with accommodations for families if needed.
recognition
release time
released time to work on international research projects and international conference presentations
remove statement requiring dept. chair to ".oK" exchanges
replacement $ to departments
should be based on what you do later with experiences (special travel allowances)
staying "in touch" with dept. & college and university events while overseas
-
99
APPENDIX C, EXHIBIT 9
QUESTION 19: ADDITIONAL COMMENTS
I judge our international education efforts on campus to be crucial for the future of our institution, state, and nation. More students
and faculty should explore these opportunities.
Science is an international activity. Students in &cience travel when the research opportunities they need are outside the U.S. The
business community in the U.S. would serve the common good if they were: a) able to use several foreign languages
b) thought in an unprejudging - extra cultural manner
c) were xenoculturaphilie
I was awarded a paid leave to develop a cross-cultural syllabus for my area Bur no one is interested. I'm glad you are researching
this topic, Carol.
I teach insurance. 1Wo facts are relevant to that statement:
1) We have 1.3 faculty trying to handle our insurance major. I am SWAMPED!
2) Insurance in the U.S. is quite different from insurance abroad. I don't have the time to stay current on the differences.
suggested the above should disqualify me from the questionnaire but the student who brought it to me insisted.
The President and the Provost should be agreed to act aggressively on the "Blue Ribbon Panel" recommendations for
internationalizing BSU.
Would like to see final report
Use international courses to replace out of date general studies requirements - BSU's general studies is patterned after the 1840's
We live in a global society - a pro active stance for increasing understanding across cultures is for the University to help subsidize
opportunities to do so. Focus initially needs to be given to informing the Ball State Community of programs and opportunities. A
commitment from sc:nior level personnel must then be made to help defray costs and to develop a plan by which a purpose is
identified. The expc:rience needs to be a two-way street, i.e. both constituencies need to win - the faculty members and the university.
Furthermore once the experience is completed, the participant should be required in some fashion to use or share those experiences
with students throu~;h the curriculum or through other kinds of academic experiences. Additionally, what ever is proposed should be
written with in the mission of the university and identified in specific objectives consistent with what we are trying to achieve.
We do not take advantage of our international students. They are isolated in the dormitories. Insufficient interaction is facilitated.
Ball State's only int.:rest in International Education is as a means to make money. My exchange professorship at the university of
Yaounde, Camerooll, West Africa, was viewed of less worth than the activities of all other faculty in my department even though I
chaired doctoral co[nmittees and produced substantial published research from my stay. Indeed six years later I have yet to
professionally recover. I would not encourage any faculty to accept overseas assignments.
Aren't you sorry yo'u got my name from your random list!
Need more diverse student body as a primary way of increasing international awareness!
Most of students are not interested in events and people outside Indiana. I am a foreign professor and I try not to talk about the
culture of my natM: country in my classes in order to minimize resentment toward foreign elements.
This topic is most important for all student majors and all faculty regardless the department. We need to continue to publicize
opportunities and to make it possible for students and faculty to take advantage of these opportunities.
By far the most important way of internationalizing the campus is student programs abroad and having foreign students here. The
goals announced as internationalization seem good, but much less money is spent on this than on computers or on sports, so how
seriously can we take the talk?
-
It's all very well to ask about faculty incentives but how about student incentives? This must be the 1st priority. There needs to be
scholarships for students particularly for the Field Studies programs. Until Worthen starts to say" I think an International experience
is important for students and I'm going to get money for student scholarships." his internationalization of BSU is w/o substance.
100
1"'-'·,
Ball State in many WllIYS is still living in the past as a typical, isolationist mid-western university. The majority of its professors and
administrators have never studied foreign languages or cultures and have no feeling or appreciation for the importance of such study.
For example, the "travel and tourism" curriculum offered by the dept. of Geography does not even require a foreign language or
culture course of its Inajors. How can one function efficiently in this occupational area without a knowledge of foreign language
and/or cultures? Or how would it be possible to market American made goods in Europe or any where else without a knowledge of
European tastes or advertising techniques! We're Amply missing the boat.
This could have been done on 2 sheets w/ back to back copying and narrow margins
Please make results available to those that may be interested.
I strongly support th.: (inevitable) move towards a more international focus. How to teach "cultural diversity" (="relativism") is a
difficult task, but think 1) it's worth it & 2) there are no viable options!
Ball State's administration must get SOlidly behind the push to internationalize the curriculum, or it won't go very far. So far there are
nice words but little substance.
The university & colleges allocate necessary $$ to international activities/research. Promotion & tenure documents should include
reference to international activities/research.
I've taught in Germany for the University of Maryland and Ball State when we offered degree programs for the air force. In Ras
Tanura, Saudi Arabia I taught at the ARAMCO facility for Indiana University. I'm on our departmental committee for International
Programs.
In an ideal university one might believe that any program that increases knowledge is good and should be present (this would include
International StudiCli). However, all universities including BSU are restructured by fiscal parameter. If the university is underfunded,
I don't feel that increasing the number of programs would be beneficial as it would necessitate lowering funding in other programs.
Much of what is asked here would be nice to have but I feel BSU cannot afford it. There are too many other needs.
I am a great believer in international experience. I just don't think that the commission in Higher Education or the citizens of E.C.
Indiana care about it re:BSU.
Courses in psychological science because of their content areas are difficult to relate internationally. However, more could be done in
some courses but tbjs would depend upon the individual professor.
BSU does encourage and support international educ. more needs to-be done - increased funding, admin. support (espec. at dept. &
college level) and p:rovisions to make profs feel they are not penalized in any way for participating.
I think international travel and study in the ideal way to increase the general level of understanding of cultural differences on a person
to person basis. M-~ch can be learned in the classroom via media language, reading, foreign guests, etc. To that extent all students
should learn anothe:r language is debatable. I have talked to a number of high school student who have already studied Spanish and
are interested in a Spanish minor, with nursing major. Perhaps there is more interest in current, oncoming students than in the past in
languages and a teCluirement would not bother them.
At least 1 year of foreign language would truly benefit our students. They will not all live in Indiana their entire lives. We need to
integrate them to other cultures and expose them to as many learning experiences as possible.
It seems that the fa.culty international visitors and scholars, Fulbrights, etc., are circulated among Senior Faculty and Administrators.
Seems a little "clique-y" to me.
Another infusion approach would be to encourage student clubs to design some of their programs in this area.
I hope that you share your results with:
Martin Umbird, Center for International Programs
Judith Roepke, AsI;ociate Provost
Warren Vanderhill, Provost
I'd love to see more trips like the Far East Asian Exchange organized and underwritten by the University.
I have lived in Germany for a year and traveled much of Europe and Scandinavia. We were a host family to an AFS student for a year
and we have gone back and forth several times. I now have a daughter living in Germany.
I would love for an international aspect to be added - emphasized - encouraged within the dept. and throughout the university I think
widespread interna.tional opportunities should be available, but optional.
101